British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Last updated

Overview

The leading international journal in the field, [3] BJPS publishes outstanding new work on a variety of traditional and 'cutting edge' topics, from issues of explanation and realism to the applicability of mathematics, from the metaphysics of science to the nature of models and simulations, as well as foundational issues in the physical, life, and social sciences. Recent topics covered in the journal include the epistemology of measurement, mathematical non-causal explanations, signalling games, the nature of biochemical kinds, and approaches to human cognitive development, among many others. The journal seeks to advance the field by publishing innovative and thought-provoking papers, discussion notes and book reviews that open up new directions or shed new light on well-known issues. [4]

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science operates a triple-anonymized peer review process and receives over 600 submissions a year. [3] It is fully compliant with the RCUK open access policy, [5] and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). [6]

In 2016, book reviews were moved to online-only publication in the BJPS Review of Books. [7]

In 2021, the journal launched BJPS Short Reads, essays and a podcast featuring introductions to their published articles. [8]

The journal also runs a blog, Auxiliary Hypotheses. [9]

Editorial board

Past editors include J. O. Wisdom, [10] Alexander Bird, Peter Clark, Mary Hesse, James Ladyman, Imre Lakatos, and David Papineau. [1]

Editors-in-Chief

Professor Tim Lewens (University of Cambridge) and Professor Robert D. Rupert (University of Colorado Boulder) [11]

Deputy Editor

Dr Elizabeth Hannon (LSE)

Associate Editors


Past Editors-in-Chief
Wendy Parker2017-2024
Steven French2011-2020
Michela Massimi 2011-2017
Alexander Bird & James Ladyman2005-2011
Peter Clark1999-2004
David Papineau 1993-1998
G M K Hunt1986-1993
Donald A. Gillies 1983-1985
John Worrall 1980-1981
John W. N. Watkins & John Worrall 1974-1979
Imre Lakatos 1971-1973
David Hugh Mellor 1969-1971
Mary Hesse & David Hugh Mellor 1969
Mary Hesse 1965-1969
John Oulton Wisdom 1956-1964
Alistair Cameron Crombie 1950-1955

The BJPS Popper Prize

The prize is awarded to the best paper appearing in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science as determined by the Editors-in-Chief and the BSPS Committee. The prize includes a £500 award to the winner(s). [13]

History of the prize

The Sir Karl Popper Essay Prize was originally established at the wish of the late Dr Laurence B. Briskman, formerly of the Department of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, who died on 8 May 2002, having endowed an essay prize fund to encourage work in any area falling under the general description of the critical rationalist philosophy of Karl Popper. Briskman was greatly influenced by Popper, who remained the dominant intellectual influence on his philosophical outlook throughout his career. While originally open for submissions, since 2011 the prize is only awarded to papers having appeared in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. [13] The endowment ended in 2017, at which point the BSPS took over funding the prize. The decision was also taken to widen the prize's remit, to include all papers published in the BJPS and not just those concerned with Popper's work. At the same time, the prize's name was changed to the BJPS Popper Prize. [14]

Previous winners

YearAuthorTitle
2023James DiFrisco'Toward a Theory of Homology: Development and the De-coupling of Morphological and Molecular Evolution'
2022Zina B. Ward'Registration Pluralism and the Cartographic Approach to Data Aggregation across Brains'
2021Eddy Keming Chen'Quantum Mechanics in a Time-Asymmetric Universe: On the Nature of the Initial Quantum State'
2020Jessica Laimann'Capricious Kinds'
2019Carlos Santana'Waiting for the Anthropocene'
2018Jonah N. Schupbach'Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning'
2017Grant Ramsey and Andreas de Block'Is Cultural Fitness Hopelessly Confused?'
2016Co-winner: Elizabeth Irvine'Model-Based Theorizing in Cognitive Neuroscience'
2016Co-winner: Eran Tal'Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement'
2015Matthew Slater'Natural Kindness'
2014Rachael L. Brown'What Evolvability Really Is'
2013Charles Pence and Grant Ramsey'A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness'
2012Elliott Wagner'Deterministic Chaos and the Evolution of Meaning'
2011No award madeN/A
2010Daniel Greco'Significance Testing in Theory and Practice'
2009Sebastian Lutz'Criteria of Empirical Significance: a Success Story'
2008Antoni Diller'On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism'
2007No award madeN/A
2006Maria Kronfeldner'Darwinian Hypothesis Formation Revisited'
2005No award madeN/A
2004Benjamin Elliott'Falsifiable Statements in Theology: Karl Popper and Christian Thought'

Impact factor

The 2023 impact factor for BJPS was 3.2, while its five-year impact factor was 2.92, making it the leading philosophy of science journal and 5th in the history and philosophy of science category. [3]

YearImpact Factor
20233.2
20223.4
20213.282
20203.978
20192.605
20181.768
20172.053
20161.985
20151.738
20141.281
20131.017
20120.919
20111.097
20101.048
20091.109
20080.867
20070.884
20060.689

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Falsifiability</span> Property of a statement that can be logically contradicted

Falsifiability is a deductive standard of evaluation of scientific theories and hypotheses, introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in his book The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934). A theory or hypothesis is falsifiable if it can be logically contradicted by an empirical test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Popper</span> Austrian–British philosopher of science (1902–1994)

Sir Karl Raimund Popper was an Austrian–British philosopher, academic and social commentator. One of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can be scrutinised with decisive experiments. Popper was opposed to the classical justificationist account of knowledge, which he replaced with critical rationalism, namely "the first non-justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imre Lakatos</span> Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science

Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its "methodology of proofs and refutations" in its pre-axiomatic stages of development, and also for introducing the concept of the "research programme" in his methodology of scientific research programmes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Feyerabend</span> Austrian philosopher of science (1924–1994)

Paul Karl Feyerabend was an Austrian philosopher best known for his work in the philosophy of science. He started his academic career as lecturer in the philosophy of science at the University of Bristol (1955–1958); afterwards, he moved to the University of California, Berkeley, where he taught for three decades (1958–1989). At various points in his life, he held joint appointments at the University College London (1967–1970), the London School of Economics (1967), the FU Berlin (1968), Yale University (1969), the University of Auckland, the University of Sussex (1974), and, finally, the ETH Zurich (1980–1990). He gave lectures and lecture series at the University of Minnesota (1958–1962), Stanford University (1967), the University of Kassel (1977) and the University of Trento (1992).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ernst Gombrich</span> Austrian-British art historian (1909–2001)

Sir Ernst Hans Josef Gombrich was an Austrian-born art historian who, after settling in England in 1936, became a naturalised British citizen in 1947 and spent most of his working life in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Albert</span> German philosopher (1921–2023)

Hans Albert was a German philosopher. He was professor of social sciences at the University of Mannheim from 1963, and remained at the university until 1989. His fields of research were social sciences and general studies of methods. He was a critical rationalist, paying special attention to rational heuristics. Albert was a strong critic of the continental hermeneutic tradition coming from Heidegger and Gadamer.

In philosophy, verisimilitude is the notion that some propositions are closer to being true than other propositions. The problem of verisimilitude is the problem of articulating what it takes for one false theory to be closer to the truth than another false theory.

Testability is a primary aspect of science and the scientific method. There are two components to testability:

  1. Falsifiability or defeasibility, which means that counterexamples to the hypothesis are logically possible.
  2. The practical feasibility of observing a reproducible series of such counterexamples if they do exist.

Jeremy Shearmur is a British former reader in philosophy in the School of Philosophy at the Australian National University, who retired at the end of 2013. He is currently an emeritus fellow, lives in Dumfries, Scotland, and is undertaking research and a limited amount of lecturing and Ph.D. supervision. He was educated at the London School of Economics.

David Robert Loy is an American scholar and author, and teacher in the Sanbo Zen lineage of Japanese Zen Buddhism.

Nicholas Maxwell is a British philosopher.

The propensity theory of probability is a probability interpretation in which the probability is thought of as a physical propensity, disposition, or tendency of a given type of situation to yield an outcome of a certain kind, or to yield a long-run relative frequency of such an outcome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Worrall (philosopher)</span> Philosopher (born 1946)

John Worrall was a professor of philosophy of science at the London School of Economics until his retirement in 2019, when he became Emeritus Professor. He was also associated with the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science at the same institution.

<i>Kuhn vs. Popper</i> 2003 book by Steve Fuller

Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science is a 2003 book by the sociologist Steve Fuller, in which the author discusses and criticizes the philosophers of science Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The book was published by Columbia University Press.

Donald Angus Gillies is a British philosopher and historian of science and mathematics. He is an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at University College London.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Henry Woodger</span>

Joseph Henry Woodger was a British theoretical biologist and philosopher of biology whose attempts to make biological sciences more rigorous and empirical was significantly influential to the philosophy of biology in the twentieth century. Karl Popper, the prominent philosopher of science, claimed "Woodger... influenced and stimulated the evolution of the philosophy of science in Britain and in the United States as hardly anybody else".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cambridge University Moral Sciences Club</span> Philosophical discussion group

The Cambridge University Moral Sciences Club, founded in October 1878, is a philosophy discussion group that meets weekly at the University of Cambridge during term time. Speakers are invited to present a paper with a strict upper time limit of 45 minutes, after which there is discussion for an hour. Several Colleges have hosted the Club: Trinity College, King's College, Clare College, Darwin College, St John's College, and from 2014 Newnham College.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John W. N. Watkins</span> Philosopher and professor (1924–1999)

John William Nevill Watkins was an English philosopher, a professor at the London School of Economics from 1966 until his retirement in 1989 and a prominent proponent of critical rationalism.

Lisa Bortolotti is an Italian philosopher who is currently professor of philosophy in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Her work is in the philosophy of the cognitive sciences, including philosophy of psychology and philosophy of psychiatry, as well as bioethics and medical ethics. She was educated at the University of Bologna, King's College London, University of Oxford and the Australian National University, and worked briefly at the University of Manchester before beginning at Birmingham, where she has been a lecturer, senior lecturer, reader and now professor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Society for Phenomenology</span>

The British Society for Phenomenology (BSP) is an organisation whose purpose is to pursue and exchange philosophical ideas inspired by phenomenology. It was established in 1967 by Wolfe Mays. The current president of the BSP is Dr Keith Crome. The society accomplishes its aims through a journal, an annual conference (as well as other events), and a podcast.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science".
  2. "The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science". NLM Catalog. NCBI. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Editorial Statistics".
  4. "The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 73, No 2".
  5. Open Access at Chicago.
  6. "The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science". Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  7. "BJPS Short Reads". BJPS Short Reads.
  8. "BJPS Review of Books". BJPS Review of Books.
  9. "Auxiliary Hypotheses". Auxiliary Hypotheses.
  10. "Obituary: J. O. Wisdom". The Independent. 4 March 1993. Retrieved 1 February 2019. John Oulton Wisdom, philosopher, born Dublin 29 December 1908.. editor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1952–63 transforming it from a newcomer into a world-class journal..
  11. "Editorial Board".
  12. "BJPS History".
  13. 1 2 "The Sir Karl Popper Essay Prize". British Society for the Philosophy of Science. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  14. "BJPS Popper Prize 2017". Auxiliary Hypotheses. 8 January 2018.