Discipline | Philosophy of science |
---|---|
Language | English |
Edited by |
|
Publication details | |
History | 1950–present |
Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Frequency | Quarterly [2] |
3.282 (2021) | |
Standard abbreviations | |
ISO 4 | Br. J. Philos. Sci. |
MathSciNet | British J. Philos. Sci. |
Indexing | |
CODEN | BJPIA5 |
ISSN | 0007-0882 (print) 1464-3537 (web) |
OCLC no. | 01537267 |
Links | |
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (BJPS) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal of philosophy, owned by the British Society for the Philosophy of Science (BSPS) and published by University of Chicago Press. [1] The journal publishes work that uses philosophical methods in addressing issues raised in the natural and human sciences.
The leading international journal in the field, [3] BJPS publishes outstanding new work on a variety of traditional and 'cutting edge' topics, from issues of explanation and realism to the applicability of mathematics, from the metaphysics of science to the nature of models and simulations, as well as foundational issues in the physical, life, and social sciences. Recent topics covered in the journal include the epistemology of measurement, mathematical non-causal explanations, signalling games, the nature of biochemical kinds, and approaches to human cognitive development, among many others. The journal seeks to advance the field by publishing innovative and thought-provoking papers, discussion notes and book reviews that open up new directions or shed new light on well-known issues. [4]
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science operates a triple-anonymized peer review process and receives over 600 submissions a year. [3] It is fully compliant with the RCUK open access policy, [5] and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). [6]
In 2016, book reviews were moved to online-only publication in the BJPS Review of Books. [7]
The journal also runs a blog, Auxiliary Hypotheses. [8]
Past editors include J. O. Wisdom, [9] Alexander Bird, Peter Clark, Mary Hesse, James Ladyman, Imre Lakatos, and David Papineau. [1]
Professor Robert D. Rupert (University of Colorado Boulder) and Professor Wendy Parker (Virginia Tech) [10]
Dr Elizabeth Hannon (LSE)
Steven French | 2011-2020 |
Michela Massimi | 2011-2017 |
Alexander Bird & James Ladyman | 2005-2011 |
Peter Clark | 1999-2004 |
David Papineau | 1993-1998 |
G M K Hunt | 1986-1993 |
Donald A. Gillies | 1983-1985 |
John Worrall | 1980-1981 |
John W. N. Watkins & John Worrall | 1974-1979 |
Imre Lakatos | 1971-1973 |
David Hugh Mellor | 1969-1971 |
Mary Hesse & David Hugh Mellor | 1969 |
Mary Hesse | 1965-1969 |
John Oulton Wisdom | 1956-1964 |
Alistair Cameron Crombie | 1950-1955 |
The prize is awarded to the best paper appearing in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science as determined by the Editors-in-Chief and the BSPS Committee. The prize includes a £500 award to the winner(s). [12]
The Sir Karl Popper Essay Prize was originally established at the wish of the late Dr Laurence B. Briskman, formerly of the Department of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, who died on 8 May 2002, having endowed an essay prize fund to encourage work in any area falling under the general description of the critical rationalist philosophy of Karl Popper. Briskman was greatly influenced by Popper, who remained the dominant intellectual influence on his philosophical outlook throughout his career. While originally open for submissions, since 2011 the prize is only awarded to papers having appeared in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. [12] The endowment ended in 2017, at which point the BSPS took over funding the prize. The decision was also taken to widen the prize's remit, to include all papers published in the BJPS and not just those concerned with Popper's work. At the same time, the prize's name was changed to the BJPS Popper Prize. [13]
Year | Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2022 | Zina B. Ward | 'Registration Pluralism and the Cartographic Approach to Data Aggregation across Brains' |
2021 | Eddy Keming Chen | 'Quantum Mechanics in a Time-Asymmetric Universe: On the Nature of the Initial Quantum State' |
2020 | Jessica Laimann | 'Capricious Kinds' |
2019 | Carlos Santana | 'Waiting for the Anthropocene' |
2018 | Jonah N. Schupbach | 'Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning' |
2017 | Grant Ramsey and Andreas de Block | 'Is Cultural Fitness Hopelessly Confused?' |
2016 | Co-winner: Elizabeth Irvine | 'Model-Based Theorizing in Cognitive Neuroscience' |
2016 | Co-winner: Eran Tal | 'Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement' |
2015 | Matthew Slater | 'Natural Kindness' |
2014 | Rachael L. Brown | 'What Evolvability Really Is' |
2013 | Charles Pence and Grant Ramsey | 'A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness' |
2012 | Elliott Wagner | 'Deterministic Chaos and the Evolution of Meaning' |
2011 | No award made | N/A |
2010 | Daniel Greco | 'Significance Testing in Theory and Practice' |
2009 | Sebastian Lutz | 'Criteria of Empirical Significance: a Success Story' |
2008 | Antoni Diller | 'On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism' |
2007 | No award made | N/A |
2006 | Maria Kronfeldner | 'Darwinian Hypothesis Formation Revisited' |
2005 | No award made | N/A |
2004 | Benjamin Elliott | 'Falsifiable Statements in Theology: Karl Popper and Christian Thought' |
The 2021 impact factor for BJPS was 3.282, while its five-year impact factor was 3.144, making it the leading philosophy of science journal, 3rd in the Science Citation Index, and 4th in the Social Sciences Citation Index. [3]
Year | Impact Factor |
---|---|
2021 | 3.282 |
2020 | 3.978 |
2019 | 2.605 |
2018 | 1.768 |
2017 | 2.053 |
2016 | 1.985 |
2015 | 1.738 |
2014 | 1.281 |
2013 | 1.017 |
2012 | 0.919 |
2011 | 1.097 |
2010 | 1.048 |
2009 | 1.109 |
2008 | 0.867 |
2007 | 0.884 |
2006 | 0.689 |
Falsifiability is a deductive standard of evaluation of scientific theories and hypotheses, introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in his book The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934). A theory or hypothesis is falsifiable if it can be logically contradicted by an empirical test.
Sir Karl Raimund Popper was an Austrian–British philosopher, academic and social commentator. One of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can be scrutinised with decisive experiments. Popper was opposed to the classical justificationist account of knowledge, which he replaced with critical rationalism, namely "the first non-justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy".
Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its "methodology of proofs and refutations" in its pre-axiomatic stages of development, and also for introducing the concept of the "research programme" in his methodology of scientific research programmes.
Paul Karl Feyerabend was an Austrian philosopher best known for his work in the philosophy of science. He started his academic career as lecturer in the philosophy of science at the University of Bristol (1955–1958); afterwards, he moved to the University of California, Berkeley, where he taught for three decades (1958–1989). At various points in his life, he held joint appointments at the University College London (1967–1970), the London School of Economics (1967), the FU Berlin (1968), Yale University (1969), the University of Auckland, the University of Sussex (1974), and, finally, the ETH Zurich (1980–1990). He gave lectures and lecture series at the University of Minnesota (1958-1962), Stanford University (1967), the University of Kassel (1977) and the University of Trento (1992).
Sir Ernst Hans Josef Gombrich was an Austrian-born art historian who, after settling in England in 1936, became a naturalised British citizen in 1947 and spent most of his working life in the United Kingdom.
David Charles Stove was an Australian philosopher whose writings often challenged prevailing academic orthodoxy. He was known for his critiques of postmodernism, feminism, and multiculturalism.
Sir Herbert Butterfield was an English historian and philosopher of history, who was Regius Professor of Modern History and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge. He is remembered chiefly for a short volume early in his career entitled The Whig Interpretation of History (1931) and for his Origins of Modern Science (1949). Butterfield turned increasingly to historiography and man's developing view of the past. Butterfield was a devout Christian and reflected at length on Christian influences in historical perspectives.
William Warren Bartley III, known as W. W. Bartley III, was an American philosopher specializing in 20th century philosophy, language and logic, and the Vienna Circle.
In philosophy, verisimilitude is the notion that some propositions are closer to being true than other propositions. The problem of verisimilitude is the problem of articulating what it takes for one false theory to be closer to the truth than another false theory.
Testability is a primary aspect of science and the scientific method. There are two components to testability:
Jeremy Shearmur is a British former reader in philosophy in the School of Philosophy at the Australian National University, who retired at the end of 2013. He is currently an emeritus fellow, lives in Dumfries, Scotland, and is undertaking research and a limited amount of lecturing and Ph.D. supervision. He was educated at the London School of Economics.
David Robert Loy is an American scholar and author, and teacher in the Sanbo Zen lineage of Japanese Zen Buddhism.
Nicholas Maxwell is a British philosopher.
The propensity theory of probability is a probability interpretation in which the probability is thought of as a physical propensity, disposition, or tendency of a given type of situation to yield an outcome of a certain kind, or to yield a long-run relative frequency of such an outcome.
John Worrall was a professor of philosophy of science at the London School of Economics until his retirement in 2019, when he became Emeritus Professor. He was also associated with the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science at the same institution.
Hans-Joachim Niemann, is a German philosopher and PhD chemist, who has become known especially as a translator and editor of works by Karl Popper, including first editions and first translations. As a scholarly writer, he first published scientific papers, then many essays and several books on Karl Popper's philosophy and Critical Rationalism, including a 400-page Lexicon of Critical Rationalism. His Popper studies helped to establish Karl Popper as a major ethicist and as an important biophilosopher.
Donald Angus Gillies is a British philosopher and historian of science and mathematics. He is an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at University College London.
Joseph Henry Woodger was a British theoretical biologist and philosopher of biology whose attempts to make biological sciences more rigorous and empirical was significantly influential to the philosophy of biology in the twentieth century. Karl Popper, the prominent philosopher of science, claimed "Woodger... influenced and stimulated the evolution of the philosophy of science in Britain and in the United States as hardly anybody else".
John William Nevill Watkins was an English philosopher, a professor at the London School of Economics from 1966 until his retirement in 1989 and a prominent proponent of critical rationalism.
The British Society for Phenomenology (BSP) is an organization whose purpose is to pursue and exchange philosophical ideas inspired by phenomenology. It was established in 1967 by Wolfe Mays. The society accomplishes its aims through a journal, an annual conference (as well as other events), and a podcast.
John Oulton Wisdom, philosopher, born Dublin 29 December 1908.. editor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1952–63 transforming it from a newcomer into a world-class journal..