Carthage Punic Ports

Last updated

Location of Punic ports. Karta Karthago fr.png
Location of Punic ports.

The Carthage Punic Ports were the old ports of the city of Carthage that were in operation during ancient times. Carthage was first and foremost a thalassocracy, [1] that is, a power that was referred to as an Empire of the Seas, whose primary force was based on the scale of its trade. The Carthaginians, however, were not the only ones to follow that policy of control over the seas, since several of the people in those times "lived by and for the sea".

Contents

Carthage, or Qart Hadasht (New City), was a product of eastern colonization, having its origin in Dido, the daughter of the king of Tyre. According to her legend recorded in the Aeneid , this Tyrian princess was the founder and first queen of the city in 814 B.C. (the most widely accepted date).

Since Utica was founded around 1100 BC, Carthage is not considered the first Phoenician colony on the North African coast. Beyond its origin, the city largely controlled the entire western basin of the Mediterranean Sea and developed its African hinterland, only reaching its end when it had to face the Roman Republic, an emerging power that caused its ultimate downfall.

Due to its identity, Carthage was an anchor point between the two basins of the Mediterranean; the eastern part, known as the cradle of Phoenicia, and the western part, which was the place of its expansion and downfall.

The ports of such a city, which were the most important point of communication with the outside world, are therefore of fundamental importance in the history of Carthage in this context. Their history was documented by an important source; Appian, a historian of Ancient Greece who lived in the 2nd century BC Despite his description, the location of the ports was the work of archaeological excavations begun in the 1970s.

Sources and location issues

Ports location in Phoenician cities

Current shore of Carthage Panorama portPunic Abril 07.jpg
Current shore of Carthage

The Phoenicians did not entrust to luck the choice of a new colony in a particular place. The location of the new settlement had to respond to a series of peculiar requirements, related to its defence and above all to its port characteristics. It was necessary that cargo ships could easily enter the port and that the opposing wind did not make access to the port impossible. To this end, the choice of the cape was particularly important. [2] In addition, the location of the port, due to its physical characteristics, had to offer an easy defence so the settlers only had to increase the natural defences to ensure security.

The location of the New City responded particularly well to the two requirements. The embarkation area was formidably protected thanks to the opportune location of the Sidi Bou Saïd promontory, the city itself in stricto sensu . It was located on the outside of the seafront, between two stretches of water (today's Lake of Tunis and Sebkha Ariana), and the interior was intercepted by a succession of hills, which formed a natural defensive line.

Ports location in Carthage

The matter of the Carthage ports' location has been one of the most discussed in Punic historiography. By observation alone, the two present-day lagoons —one circular and the other rectangular— both joined by a thin string and identified as the ports of Carthage at the beginning of the 19th century by Chateaubriand, could not be the ports that had harboured the fleet of "Rome's greatest enemy" in the historians' minds.

The recent excavations carried out in the sector during the UNESCO international campaign (a series of American excavations carried out near the rectangular lagoon and English excavations carried out in the circular lagoon) confirmed the Punic origin of the lagoons, dating them to the 2nd century BC [3] This dating was possible thanks to the discovery of ceramic remains, particularly in the excavations carried out in the carena coves.

However, the original port that was used during the first five centuries of the Punic history of the North African city has yet to be located, and it is not even known whether or not this port was located on the site of the lagoons. In the first two centuries of its existence, Carthage had no more port facilities than any other colony in the Mediterranean, as it merely had a place from which ships were to be launched. [4] No visible traces of such places have remained, since they have been eliminated by later installations or by radical changes in the local topography.

The matter of the Carthage ports' location has been linked to the history and topography of the place. It is known that the location of the city concerning the shore evolved a lot over the centuries and that during ancient times a process of polderization took place, consisting of a human action that was coupled to the transport of sediments from the Bagradas river, moved there due to ocean currents.

American excavations have shown that the Salambó tofet was probably unhealthy at that time, which suggests that the primitive port sector was probably located in that area.

Archaeological excavations have uncovered the traces of a canal that suggest that it functioned until its filling in the 4th century BC. The canal in question can be followed archaeologically for about 400 m, having been built on natural terrain. Some historians have suggested that there is a link with the Lake of Tunis due to the nature of the sediments found. [5] Serge Lancel has also documented that the level of Lake Tunis was significantly higher than in the ancient period of the city, and mentions its shores as a probable place of refuge. [6] According to this theory, the canal was a "line of penetration" into the interior of the city. It is also assumed that there could have been a second canal parallel to the first. On the edges of these facilities would have been the naval dockyards. The hangars, stores and temples would be erected nearby, constituting the "emporium". It is important to note that, due to the nature of the Punic civilization, its relationship with the sea was fundamental and that the centre of the city, the agora, shouldn't have been located far from its economic centre. Experts have theorized that the canal was not used for navigation, but for landing in an area particularly hostile to human presence. [7] The location of the Tofet of Salambo, in the vicinity of the centre of the original Phoenician colony, is a clear sign of this possible hostility according to the sections that have been discovered, dating from the 8th century BC.

There have been many discrepancies among the experts about the location of the primitive ports of Carthage. By analogy with other places, and taking into account the need to avoid unfavourable winds, the possible location of one of the ports is placed in the vicinity of the area of the Baths of Antoninus, towards the north of the site, [note 1] that is, towards the southern area of Le Kram. [4] The discoveries made at the site suggest that this first location is very likely since the Roman baths used to be located on land reclaimed from the sea. Therefore, in this area could have been located one of the primitive ports of the city. Certain historians believe, however, that the site of the primitive port was in the vicinity of the village of Sidi Bou Saïd, because of its location near a cape, which gave it a privileged geographical position so important in the eyes of the Phoenicians. Other experts, including Serge Lancel, placed the position of the ports along the Lake of Tunis, less assembled in ancient times than nowadays. Lancel places the position of the port on the beaches of Marsa, at a relative distance from the city (about 3 km approximately), but close enough to the neighbourhood of Megara. [8]

Regardless, it becomes essential to focus on the observation of the structures of which traces are preserved to see if it is possible to contrast their existence with ancient sources and thus obtain an approximate date of their construction.

Military and commercial port

Description of Appian

Appian, an author of the 2nd century AD., was based on the work of Polybius, who witnessed the downfall of the city of Dido, and whose text has been lost. His description is very important, even if it sometimes raises more questions than answers. It is a text that deals with specific topics of ancient history.

View of the ports (1958). Carthage-1958-PortsPuniques.jpg
View of the ports (1958).

The ports of Carthage were arranged in such a way that ships could pass from one to the other; they were accessed from the sea through an entrance about 21 m wide, which was closed with an iron chain. The first port, reserved for merchant ships, was provided with numerous and varied moorings. In the middle of the inner harbour was an island. The island and the harbour were bordered by large ports. Along these ports were hangars, which could accommodate 220 warships, and above the hangars were erected warehouses for the rigging. In front of each hangar rose two Ionic columns, which gave the circumference of the harbor and the island the appearance of a portico. A pavilion was built on the island for the admiral, and from this building, the trumpet signals and herald calls were made. From there, the admiral exercised his vigilance. The island was located in front of the entrance and was at a higher altitude: thus the admiral could see what was happening at sea, while those arriving from beyond could not clearly distinguish the interior of the port. The arsenals were invisible even to merchant ships: they were surrounded by a double wall and equipped with gates, which allowed merchant ships to pass from the first port to the city without being able to pass through the arsenals. [note 2]

In addition to the two dársenas [note 3] surrounded by fortifications, Appian also mentions a large breakwater and a large foreshore.

The present site of the circular lagoon has an area of about eight hectares, the other lagoon is about twice as large. [note 4] The commercial port was connected to the sea by a canal, which must have flowed into the present-day Kram Bay, of which no remains exist.

Appian cites the term " cothon " to designate the ports, a word of Semitic origin that designates an artificial dársena created by men. [9] Such spaces are relatively well known in other Punic cities, such as Motya, in Sicily, or Mahdia, in Tunisia. Strabo also provides data on the distance from the Carthage Ports to Cape Lillibaeus, [note 5] a promontory southeast of Sicily, which he estimates at 1500 stadia (277.5 km). [note 6] The literary tradition has been verified by archaeology. Archaeologists have made models reconstructing the archaeological site in the different epochs of the city's history. These models are exhibited in the small museum of the Admiralty Islet.

Admiralty Islet

Darsena levees. Tunisie Carthage Port 01.JPG
Dársena levees.

At first glance, it is difficult to identify the circular lagoon as the circular port of ancient Carthage in which a fleet that shook the western Mediterranean basin was sheltered.

A priori it is difficult to see how they could have had 220 ships there, such as the quinqueremes, ships with five oarsmen divided into three rows. However, British excavations have revealed that the circular lagoon was the military port and that the navarch's flag must have been on the islet. Punic ports have been found, particularly the ramps of the dársena levees or dry docks for wintering. The ramps had a slightly sloping beaten earth floor. [10] These dársenas were undoubtedly the warehouses fitted out to accommodate the ships mentioned by Strabo.

The archaeological remains uncovered made it possible to extrapolate the site's reception capacity: 30 levees on the circular islet and 135 to 140 levees around the perimeter. In total, 160 to 170 levees could accommodate as many warships as have been identified. [11] [12] Below the dársena levees were located the storage spaces. It has been assumed that each levee could accommodate two rows of ships. In the middle of the circular islet was an open space, next to which stood a tower, which is likely to be the tower of the navarch mentioned by Appian.

It has been pointed out that the levees could have served mainly as a naval shipyard, and that all the ships did not need to be operated at the same time. On the other hand, agglomerations should only take place during winter. [13]

Commercial port

The two ports were connected by a canal, at the entrance of which, according to another text by Appian, an esplanade was used to store goods. An American mission proceeded to carry out a series of excavations in that area and found the remains of part of a dock [14] dating from the second half of the 3rd century BC. The excavations also revealed a series of port facilities: docks and hangars, which were in the vicinity of the commercial port.

A channel led from the port to the sea and ended near the foreshore, called "Falbe's quadrilateral", after the name of the 19th century Danish archaeologist who was the first to study it. [15] The foreshore communicated with the maritime wall of the 2nd century BC. A careful study led to classify this space as an embankment or "chôma". [16] In connection with the text of Appian, one can certainly recognize, in this embankment, the space for manoeuvring, unloading and storage that protected the entrance from the prevailing winds. [17] It was perhaps in these places where the Roman army set foot during the Third Punic War, constituting the bridgehead from which the final assault started.

Conclusion

Role of ports during the downfall of Carthage

The organization of the Carthage Punic Ports in its last epoch was arranged in such a costly way and directed with an ambition based on a renewed force that violated the peace signed in 201 BC, provoking the Roman Senate to use force against the Carthaginians. [3] [18]

Located at the southern end of the city, the ports of the city were protected by a device of walls notably lighter than the one protecting the isthmus, since the Carthaginians were confident of their naval superiority. Carthage thought it was impossible for them to receive an attack from the sea, as they were prepared to repel any incursion. The final assault led by the Roman general Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus came, however, from the harbour quarter (146 BC). [19] Setting fire to the levees in the eastern part of the commercial port, Scipio seized the military port threatening the agora. This attack occurred in the final assault on the hill of Byrsa. [20] [21] The situation of the ports suffered the same fate as the rest of the city after its fall and were subsequently used during the Roman domination.

Ports location in Roman times

Admiralty islet in Roman times. Port militaire romain 3.jpg
Admiralty islet in Roman times.

The Admiralty Islet during Roman rule was occupied by a public square enclosed by columns. On it were erected a temple and an octagonal building, whose use is unknown. The mercantile activities that took place in the Carthage commercial port during Roman control were fundamental for the provisioning of Rome. [22]

In 306 the city suffered an earthquake that severely devastated the littoral zone. This earthquake was so strong that it took a long time for the city to recover from the disaster. Although port activities continued, the topography of the site had changed extensively.

What happened to the ports

The complexity of this issue has been clarified, although many areas remain obscure. Serge Lancel quotes Cicero, who speaks of the destruction of Carthage in this way in his work (De lege agraria, II, 32, 87), despite the fact that "it had strong walls and was surrounded by ports". [23]

The places where ports should be located depends on their orientation to the winds, which would notably influence their use. The places recognized as the possible locations of the ports are the following:

The vast beaches of La Marsa could also represent the merchant landing sites that were so characteristic of the daily life of the Punic capital. On this shore, still battered by the African winds, one can imagine the arrival of the ships owned by the proud merchants from the East.

Notes

  1. ↑ According to a hypothesis formulated by Dr Carton in 1911 and cited by Lancel (2000 , p. 242)
  2. ↑ Lybica (96) quoted by Decret (1977, p. 65)
  3. ↑ A structure built in a convenient direction, on the shore of the sea or of a navigable river, and used to facilitate the loading and unloading of goods and people and even, sometimes, for sheltering ships.
  4. ↑ Measurements carried out by Charles Ernest Beulé and collected by  Fantar (1993 , p. 128)
  5. ↑ Cape Lilibeo, together with Pachinus and Celorias, were the three promontories, from which arose Trinacria, the ancient name of Sicily (from Ancient Greek tria-"three" / ákra "cape, promontory"). Cf. Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War , vi.2.2; Ephorus of Cyme in FGrH 70 F 137b.
  6. ↑ Strabo, Geography of Strabo vi. 2.1.
  7. ↑ Based on the work of St. Augustine, Confessions, V, 8, 15 quoted by Lancel (2000 , p. 263)
  8. ↑ Dr. Carton's hypothesis reported by Lancel (2000 , p. 264)
  9. ↑ Also based on a hypothesis by Dr Carton, which was reported by Lancel (2000 , pp. 264–265)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carthage</span> Archaeological site in Tunisia

Carthage was an ancient city in Northern Africa, on the eastern side of the Lake of Tunis in what is now Tunisia. Carthage was one of the most important trading hubs of the Ancient Mediterranean and one of the most affluent cities of the classical world. It became the capital city of the civilisation of Ancient Carthage and later Roman Carthage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hannibal</span> Carthaginian general and statesman (247–183/181 BC)

Hannibal was a Carthaginian general and statesman who commanded the forces of Carthage in their battle against the Roman Republic during the Second Punic War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marsala</span> Comune in Sicily, Italy

Marsala is an Italian comune located in the Province of Trapani in the westernmost part of Sicily. Marsala is the most populated town in its province and the fifth in Sicily.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third Punic War</span> War between the Rome and Carthage 149–146 BC

The Third Punic War was the third and last of the Punic Wars fought between Carthage and Rome. The war was fought entirely within Carthaginian territory, in what is now northern Tunisia. When the Second Punic War ended in 201 BC one of the terms of the peace treaty prohibited Carthage from waging war without Rome's permission. Rome's ally, King Masinissa of Numidia, exploited this to repeatedly raid and seize Carthaginian territory with impunity. In 149 BC Carthage sent an army, under Hasdrubal, against Masinissa, the treaty notwithstanding. The campaign ended in disaster as the Battle of Oroscopa ended with a Carthaginian defeat and the surrender of the Carthaginian army. Anti-Carthaginian factions in Rome used the illicit military action as a pretext to prepare a punitive expedition.

Hamilcar Barca or Barcas was a Carthaginian general and statesman, leader of the Barcid family, and father of Hannibal, Hasdrubal and Mago. He was also father-in-law to Hasdrubal the Fair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Carthage (Third Punic War)</span> Main engagement of the Third Punic War

The siege of Carthage was the main engagement of the Third Punic War fought between Carthage and Rome. It consisted of the nearly-three-year siege of the Carthaginian capital, Carthage. In 149 BC, a large Roman army landed at Utica in North Africa. The Carthaginians hoped to appease the Romans, but despite the Carthaginians surrendering all of their weapons, the Romans pressed on to besiege the city of Carthage. The Roman campaign suffered repeated setbacks through 149 BC, only alleviated by Scipio Aemilianus, a middle-ranking officer, distinguishing himself several times. A new Roman commander took over in 148 BC, and fared equally badly. At the annual election of Roman magistrates in early 147 BC, the public support for Scipio was so great that the usual age restrictions were lifted to allow him to be appointed commander in Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motya</span> Island and ancient city

Motya was an ancient and powerful city on San Pantaleo Island off the west coast of Sicily, in the Stagnone Lagoon between Drepanum and Lilybaeum. It is within the present-day commune of Marsala, Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battles of Kroton</span>

The Battles of Kroton in 204 and 203 BC were, as well as the raid in Cisalpine Gaul, the last larger scale engagements between the Romans and the Carthaginians in Italy during the Second Punic War. After Hannibal’s retreat to Bruttium due to the Metaurus debacle, the Romans continuously tried to block his forces from gaining access to the Ionian Sea and cut his eventual escape to Carthage by capturing Kroton, the last port which had remained in his hands after years of fighting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cothon</span> Artificial harbour in antiquity

A cothon is an artificial, protected inner harbour such as that in Carthage during the Punic Wars c. 200 BC.

The military of Carthage was one of the largest military forces in the ancient world. Although Carthage's navy was always its main military force, the army acquired a key role in the spread of Carthaginian power over the native peoples of northern Africa and southern Iberian Peninsula from the 6th century BC and the 3rd century BC. Carthage's military also allowed it to expand into Sardinia and the Balearic Islands. This expansion transformed the military from a body of citizen-soldiers into a multinational force composed of a combination of allies, citizens and foreign mercenary units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Lilybaeum</span> First naval clash between the navies of Carthage and Rome during the Second Punic War

The Battle of Lilybaeum was the first clash between the navies of Carthage and Rome in 218 BC during the Second Punic War. The Carthaginians had sent 35 quinqueremes to raid Sicily, starting with Lilybaeum. The Romans, warned by Hiero of Syracuse of the coming raid, had time to intercept the Carthaginian contingent with a fleet of 20 quinqueremes and managed to capture several Carthaginian ships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Carthage</span>

The city of Carthage was founded in the 9th century BC on the coast of Northwest Africa, in what is now Tunisia, as one of a number of Phoenician settlements in the western Mediterranean created to facilitate trade from the city of Tyre on the coast of what is now Lebanon. The name of both the city and the wider republic that grew out of it, Carthage developed into a significant trading empire throughout the Mediterranean. The date from which Carthage can be counted as an independent power cannot exactly be determined, and probably nothing distinguished Carthage from the other Phoenician colonies in Northwest Africa and the Mediterranean during 800–700 BC. By the end of the 7th century BC, Carthage was becoming one of the leading commercial centres of the West Mediterranean region. After a long conflict with the emerging Roman Republic, known as the Punic Wars, Rome finally destroyed Carthage in 146 BC. A Roman Carthage was established on the ruins of the first. Roman Carthage was eventually destroyed—its walls torn down, its water supply cut off, and its harbours made unusable—following its conquest by Arab invaders at the close of the 7th century. It was replaced by Tunis as the major regional centre, which has spread to include the ancient site of Carthage in a modern suburb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Catana (397 BC)</span> Naval battle of the Sicilian War

The Battle of Catana took place in the summer of 397 BC. The Greek fleet under Leptines, the brother of Dionysius I of Syracuse, engaged the Carthaginian fleet under Mago near the city of Catana in Sicily. While the Greek army under Dionysius was present near the city of Catana during the battle, the Carthaginian army under Himilco was away in the interior of Sicily, making a detour around the erupting Mount Etna. The Carthaginian fleet crushed the Greek fleet in the battle, leading to the Carthaginian siege of Syracuse later in 397 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Carthage</span> Phoenician city-state and empire

Ancient Carthage was an ancient Semitic civilisation based in North Africa. Initially a settlement in present-day Tunisia, it later became a city-state and then an empire. Founded by the Phoenicians in the ninth century BC, Carthage reached its height in the fourth century BC as one of the largest metropoleis in the world. It was the centre of the Carthaginian Empire, a major power led by the Punic people who dominated the ancient western and central Mediterranean Sea. Following the Punic Wars, Carthage was destroyed by the Romans in 146 BC, who later rebuilt the city lavishly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phoenicians and wine</span> Relationship between Phoenician culture and wine

The culture of the ancient Phoenicians was one of the first to have had a significant effect on the history of wine. Phoenicia was a civilization centered in current day Lebanon. Between 1550 BC and 300 BC, the Phoenicians developed a maritime trading culture that expanded their influence from the Levant to North Africa, the Greek Isles, Sicily, and the Iberian Peninsula. Through contact and trade, they spread not only their alphabet but also their knowledge of viticulture and winemaking, including the propagation of several ancestral varieties of the Vitis vinifera species of wine grapes.

The Battle of the Port of Carthage was a naval battle of the Third Punic War fought in 147 BC between the Carthaginians and the Roman Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ksour Essef cuirass</span> Ancient Greek cuirass at the Bardo National Museum

The Ksour Essef cuirass is an ancient triple-disc cuirass found in a Punic tomb in 1909 not far from Ksour Essef, Tunisia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carthage Administration Inscription</span>

The Carthage Administration Inscription is an inscription in the Punic language, using the Phoenician alphabet, discovered on the archaeological site of Carthage in the 1960s and preserved in the National Museum of Carthage. It is known as KAI 303.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marsala Punic shipwreck</span> 3rd century BC shipwreck off Sicily

The Marsala Punic shipwreck is a third-century-BC shipwreck of two Punic ships. The wreck was discovered in 1969, off the shore of Isola Lunga, not far from Marsala on the western coast of Sicily. It was excavated from 1971 onwards. The excavation, led by Honor Frost and her team, lasted four years and revealed a substantial portion of the hull structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carthage tophet</span> Ancient sacred area in Tunisia

The Carthage tophet, is an ancient sacred area dedicated to the Phoenician deities Tanit and Baal, located in the Carthaginian district of Salammbô, Tunisia, near the Punic ports. This tophet, a "hybrid of sanctuary and necropolis", contains a large number of children's tombs which, according to some interpretations, were sacrificed or buried here after their untimely death. The area is part of the Carthage archaeological site, a UNESCO World Heritage site.

References

  1. ↑ Decret (1977)
  2. ↑ Fantar (1993 , pp. 123–124)
  3. 1 2 3 Slim & Fauqué (2001 , p. 44)
  4. 1 2 Gras, Rouillard & Teixidor (1994 , p. 210)
  5. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 252)
  6. ↑ Lancel (2000 , pp. 258–259)
  7. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 253)
  8. ↑ Lancel (2000 , pp. 265–266)
  9. ↑ Fantar (1993 , pp. 125–126)
  10. ↑ Fantar (1997 , p. 210)
  11. ↑ Beschaouch (1993 , p. 68)
  12. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 245)
  13. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 250)
  14. ↑ Ennabli & Slim (1993 , p. 36)
  15. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 247)
  16. ↑ Fantar (1993 , pp. 126–127)
  17. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 249)
  18. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 251)
  19. ↑ Fantar (1993 , p. 127)
  20. ↑ Decret (1977 , p. 65)
  21. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 241)
  22. ↑ Golvin (2003 , p. 98)
  23. ↑ Lancel (2000 , p. 263)

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.