Childcare in Francoist Spain and the democratic transition

Last updated

Childcare in Francoist Spain and the democratic transition was not about the needs of the mother, but about the needs of the state to educate children. While childcare centers had been provided by Republican aligned unions in the Spanish Civil Wars, with the start of the Franco period women were discouraged from participating in the workforce. Instead, they were expected to tend to their children in the home. The 1942 Ley de Sanidad Infantil y Maternal provided some assistance to working mothers, including maternity leave, economic incentives to breastfeed and infant childcare. By 1955, the Franco government offered educational programming for children aged three to five, but this was focused less on the needs of mothers for childcare and more on the desire to provide children with skills and abilities to succeed in later mandatory schooling. By 1970, children aged two to five were officially considered part of the educational system, even if attendance was not mandatory.

Contents

Childcare was an aspect of women's rights taken up during the democratic transition period, but it was only a very small aspect with inconsistent demands and little mobilization around the issue.  State policies of the past were continued, with increased efforts to provide more pre-school opportunities to support later school success but without considering the needs of working parents. Political parties and unions were generally unconcerned with the needs of working mothers and providing them with state-supported childcare services.  Reforms in the area of childcare were still needed after Spain finished its democratic transition.

History

Francoist period (1939 - 1975)

During the Spanish Civil War, Republican workers unions provided a number of services to assist in the war efforts.  One of these was child care services for women working to help their cause. [1] Auxilio Social, a mixed gendered Nationalist organization, also provided childcare services. [2] In the immediate post-war period, the regime put tremendous pressure on women to leave the workforce, take care of their children in their own homes and breastfeed their babies, irrespective of any subsistence level survival actions taken by women. [3]

One of the most important female labor activities in the Francoist period, especially between 1940 and 1970, was childcare. [4] The regime used Sección Femenina and Acción Católica to impose its pro-nationalist policies on Spain through the concept of traditional womanhood, that demanded among other things that women tend to the home and be primary caregivers to their children. [3] [4] This was expected of women, even if they were required to take on extra work inside the home or were able to pay someone to do basic domestic tasks. Men were expected to be in the workforce, providing a steady income that would cover the costs of running the household. There was no differentiation in this period between paid and domestic work for women.  Both were viewed as two parts of the same cause for women serving Spanish society. [4]

Working pregnant women had some Government support when it came to childcare as a result of the 1942 Ley de Sanidad Infantil y Maternal. They were given six weeks of "paid rest" after the birth of their child, a cash prize from the Government if they made the choice to breastfeed their child, and a year of childcare services. [3] [4] [5] [6] Despite this, women were not encouraged to work outside the home as it was considered detrimental to the health of their children, with a mortality rate of 63 per 1000 births for housewives compared with 74 for women who worked in the home, and 162 for women who worked outside the home. [4] [5] Women who did breastfeed their babies and who worked outside the home were strongly condemned. The only general exception was widows. [4]

Sección Feminina and Falange provided childcare services during the 1950s and 1960s to women working in the agriculture. Official women's participation in this sector was around 5.5%, but informal participation was much higher, resulting in the need for childcare. [7]

Starting around 1955, the Government created a childcare policy for children aged three to five, with the goal of developing skills and abilities that would enable them to do better in schools.  These programs were not identified as childcare in that they were not primarily about relieving mothers of childcare responsibilities so they could participate in the workforce. [8] There were a number of reasons that childcare in the Francoist period was not centered around the needs of working mothers.  These included low levels of female participation in the workforce, societal and cultural views that children under the age of three are best taken care of by their mothers, and the dictatorship imposing its concepts of womanhood on the broader population. [8]

The United Nations General Assembly created the Rights of Children document in 1959.  This was part of an effort to criminalize neglect of children and those who intentionally endangered children. [9] The 1969 World Congress of Children debated the protection of minors. [9]

The Ley 14/1970 required for the first time that children aged two to six be considered part of the education system, and effectively created educational preschool for two and three year olds, and nursery school for four and five year olds. These programs were not built around the hours that mothers would likely be at work. [8]

Democratic transition period (1975 - 1986)

Childcare was an aspect of women's rights taken up during the democratic transition period.  Starting in 1975, state policy switched to offering more opportunities for children to be enrolled in free state-run educational preschool programs.  These classes were for children aged three to five, the three years before the state mandated age of six to start attending school. [8] [10] The childcare programs that the Government focused on had two distinct features.  One was that programs for four and five year olds be educational.  Many of these programs were run through the Ministry of Education and Culture. There were few comparable programs for children aged three and under.  Second was that private childcare facilities had to be approved and regulated by the Government.  This, unlike in other western countries, included attempts to regulate private daycare run by people from their homes. [8] None of these programs were focused on the needs of working parents. This was because of a widespread belief that mothers were the best caregivers of their children. [8] [10] [11] [12] [13]

Despite increased feminist interests in childcare as a component of women's rights in the democratic period, feminists were not consistent in their demands and were unable to mobilize around the issue. [8] Feminist groups, feminists inside state institutions and women's sections of Spanish unions differed from their European peers in that they infrequently drove needs for a wide range of childcare services to be offered by the state and did not act as primary supporters of the needs of mothers.  When they were working as actors in this area, it was generally on behalf of children and focused on the educational needs of children under the age of six.  Major complaints cited the lack of Government-run educational opportunities for children in this age group. [8]

Spanish feminists may have been hesitant to address the issue of motherhood and the needs of mothers for various reasons, the first being that during the dictatorship there was no opportunity for the creation of detailed feminist thinking in a Spanish-specific context.  This development of a feminist ideology would only take place during the transition, as feminists developed specific goals that they hoped to see enacted in a new democratic Spain.  Second, much of the feminist thinking at the time was inspired by reading the philosophies of feminists from other countries.  International feminists in the mid-1970s were largely unconcerned with the concept of motherhood or the care of minor children.  Consequently, this did not percolate through internationally influenced Spanish feminist thought. [8] [14] [15] Lastly, Spain was in a dictatorship, where definitions of male and female sexuality were rigidly imposed by the state. Goals in responding specifically to the end of the dictatorship were often about achieving political equality, and less concerned with specific economic issues for women. At the same time, not discussing motherhood was viewed by some as rejecting the dictatorship's definition of womanhood that exclusively defined women in that context. [8] [16]

Some parties on the right like Alianza Popular (now Partido Popular) were open to talking about educational opportunities for young children but were reticent to discuss childcare as a result of their own beliefs in traditional Spanish motherhood, where women were not allowed to participate in the labor market. Centrist parties were also hesitant to discuss the issue, lest they lose their broad base of support. Union of the Democratic Center (UCD) made no reference to childcare in their 1977 electoral campaign. [8] [17] PSOE supported educational programs for children under six in their campaign propaganda, but this was largely part of their program to try to reduce class inequality through education; it was not out of concern for the childcare needs of working mothers. [8]

Unions also generally failed to address the needs of working parents in the transition period.  They did not create their own childcare centers.  They did not make issues around childcare needs part of any collective bargaining agreements. They did not encourage companies to create their own childcare centers, nor did they encourage them to provide monetary assistance to working parents to pay for private childcare. [8]

While many important reforms were made in the democratic transition, there were areas that still needed work.  These included child care, elderly care and higher rates of female unemployment. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sección Femenina</span> Womens branch of the Spanish political party Falange

The Sección Femenina was the women's branch of the Falange political movement in Spain. Founded in July 1934 as part of the Sindicato Español Universitario (SEU) of the Falange Española de las JONS, and fully incorporated to FE de las JONS later in the year, it remained as part of the FET y de las JONS following the 1937 Unification Decree, subsequently becoming an official institution of the single-party of the Francoist dictatorship. Following General Franco's death and the beginning of the transition to democracy it was disbanded on 1 April 1977 together with all Movimiento Nacional institutions. Sección Femenina was led throughout its history by Pilar Primo de Rivera, the younger sister of Falange Española founder José Antonio Primo de Rivera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminists and the Spanish Civil War</span> Feminism in the spanish civil war

Feminists were involved in the Spanish Civil War, although the conditions underlying their involvement pre-dated the Second Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motherhood in the Spanish Civil War</span>

Motherhood in the Spanish Civil War period was a political concept around the idea of women's involvement in support of the state. The blending of definitions of motherhood and womanhood had been occurring in Spain long before this though, with a woman's role being defined as being in the house part of a biological determinism perspective supported by male run institutions in Spain, including the Government and the Catholic Church.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Francoist Spain</span>

Women in Francoist Spain (1939–1978) were the last generation of women to not be afforded full equality under the 1978 Spanish Constitution. Women during this period found traditional Catholic Spanish gender roles being imposed on them, in terms of their employment opportunities and role in the family. For Republican women, Francoist Spain was a double loss, as the new regime first took away the limited political power and identities as women which they had won during the Second Spanish Republic (1931–1939), and it secondly forced them back into the confines of their homes. Motherhood would become the primary social function of women in Francoist Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's media in Francoist Spain</span>

Women's media in Francoist Spain suffered as a result of Francoist Spain policy. Many writers, translators and others were forced into exile, or faced stifling censorship and harassment if they remained. Spanish restrictions meant writing became one of the few acceptable occupations for women, and literate women with few other outlets for participation in Spanish society became voracious readers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in the workforce in Francoist Spain</span>

Women in the workforce in Francoist Spain faced high levels of discrimination. The end of the Spanish Civil War saw a return of traditional gender roles in the country. These were enforced by the regime through laws that regulated women's labor outside the home and the return of the Civil Code of 1889 and the former Law Procedure Criminal, which treated women as legally inferior to men. During the 1940s, women faced many obstacles to entering the workforce, including financial penalties for working outside the home, job loss upon marriage and few legally available occupations.

Motherhood in Francoist Spain was the definition of being a woman. Motherhood was important to the state because Hispanic eugenics saw women's bodies as state property. They were needed to rebuild Spain by creating a race of people aligned with the prevailing Catholic morality of the period. The regime then created numerous laws to enforce its vision of motherhood. These would not begin to relax until the late 1950s, and only face radical changes in the post-Franco period.

Feminism in Francoist Spain and the democratic transition period took place in a specific socio-historical context. Spanish feminism went through several waves in the Francoist period. Broadly speaking, they are first-wave feminism taking place from the mid-nineteenth century to 1965, second-wave feminism taking place from 1965 to 1975, and third-wave feminism taking place from 1975 to 2012.

Women in Partido Comunista de España in Francoist Spain faced many challenges. Partido Comunista de España (PCE) had been made illegal by the new regime, which banned all political parties and trade unions. In the final days of the Civil War and during the first days of Francoist Spain, women were imprisoned just for being related to "reds". They were also investigated, harassed, imprisoned and executed for expressing sympathy for Republicans or belonging to any leftist organization. Many women in PCE were caught up in this. PCE women's organization Agrupación de Mujeres Antifascistas survived the war, and shifted their priorities to assisting political prisoners in Francost jails.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's education in Francoist Spain</span> Overview of the education of women in Francoist Spain

Women's education in Francoist Spain was based around the belief that women lacked the same intellectual abilities as men and that education should prepare women for lives in the home as wives and mothers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prostitution in Francoist Spain</span>

Prostitution in Francoist Spain (1936–1975) presented the government with a problem. The Nationalist faction in the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) tolerated the practice, but prostitution was actively opposed by the Catholic Church. During the 1940s, state policy was more tolerant of it, and allowed officially sanctioned brothels to serve the "needs" of men and prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, clandestine prostitution was actively suppressed, while its economic causes, which largely involved war orphans and women in dire economic situations, were ignored.

Women in Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) in Francoist Spain played important roles in the union dating back to the Second Republic period, even as their specific needs like maternity leave, childcare provisions and equal pay were subverted for the improvement of better overall working conditions. Women UGT leaders in the Civil War period included María Lacrampe and Claudina García Perez.

Abortion in Francoist Spain and the transition period was illegal. Francoists opposed abortion because it interfered with Spanish population growth. Feminists in the early Francoist period and until the mid-1960s largely did not connect abortion with women's rights. Abortion was only briefly legal in Spain in this period in Catalonia in the final days of the Spanish Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guardianship in Francoist Spain and the democratic transition</span>

Guardianship in Francoist Spain (1939-1975) and the democratic transition (1975-1985) was a system which provided husbands and fathers with tremendous legal control over women. Male members of the family were able to transfer legal control of their daughters over to the state. One of the developments after the Civil War was the restoration of the Civil Code of 1889 by the Franco regime. This made women dependents of their husbands and fathers with men controlling not only the custody of their children, but their bank accounts, contracts, nationality and residency. Women did not reach the age of majority until 21, 25 if they were unmarried or not in a convent. Before 1963, husbands and fathers who killed their wives and daughters whom they discovered committing adultery or having sex outside marriage incurred only the symbolic punishment of destierro. Before the 1970s, women were banned from many professions. Until 1970, the husband could give a family's child to adoption without the consent of his wife.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sex education in Francoist Spain and the democratic transition</span>

Sex education in Francoist Spain (1939–1975) and the democratic transition (1975–1982) was prohibited by law to be taught in schools. When it was addressed, it was originally done so from a moralistic point of view, highlighting concepts like the need for chastity. During the mid-1950s, this practice began to change, and after formal government approval sex education incorporated more elements of psychology and biology. Despite a lack of government-sanctioned sex education, people were taught informally. Middle-class women could learn from marriage guides. More generally, as women approached the age to marry, they received more sexual education from friends, mothers, sisters, and future in-laws. Upper-class men learned by having sex with prostitutes and maids employed by their households.

Women's sexuality in Francoist Spain was defined by the Church and by the State. The purpose in doing so was to have women serve the state exclusively through reproduction and guarding the morality of the state. Women's sexuality could only be understood through the prism of reproduction and motherhood. Defying this could have tremendous negative consequences for women, including being labeled a prostitute, being removed from her family home, being sent to a concentration camp, a Catholic run institution or to a prison. It was only after the death of Franco in 1975 that women in Spain were finally allowed to define their own sexuality. Understanding Francoist imposed definitions of female sexuality is critical to understanding modern Spanish female sexuality, especially as it relates to macho behavior and women's expected responses to it.

Women in 1940s Spain were mainly recognised as mothers.

Women in 1950s Spain were mainly involved in childcare.

Women in 1960s Spain were facing a period of transition.

Women in the Spanish democratic transition period (1975–1982) were able to legally organise as feminist groups. The adultery law was repealed in 1978. Abortion was not legalized during the transition, but was in some circumstances shortly afterwards in 1985.

References

  1. ↑ "La Guerra Civil Española". socialistworker.org. Retrieved 2019-04-06.
  2. ↑ Preston, Paul; Scott-Ellis, Priscilla; Green, Nan; Sanz Bachiller, Mercedes; Nelken, Margarita (2002). Doves of war: four women of the Spanish Civil War. London: HarperCollins. ISBN   9780002556330. OCLC   317810255.
  3. 1 2 3 Sánchez, María Eugenia Galiana; Salas, Encarnación Ramos; Mestre, Josep Bernabeu; Agulló, Modesta Salazar (2010-12-01). "Madres y enfermeras: el modelo de cuidados a la infancia en la colección "Al servicio de España y del niño español" (1938-1964)". Revista Científica de Enfermería (in Spanish) (1). doi: 10.14198/recien.2010.01.03 . hdl: 10045/20315 . ISSN   1989-6409.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Muñoz, María Remedios García (2012). "Memoria y vida cotidiana. Las amas de casa de Almogía durante el Franquismo". Baética: Estudios de arte, geografía e historia (34): 451–472. ISSN   0212-5099.
  5. 1 2 Salazar Agulló M, Bernabeu-Mestre J, Martínez Marco EA, Ramos-Salas E (2008). "Salud materna y perspectiva de género en el primer franquismo. La colección "Al Servicio de España y del Niño Español"". Matronas Profesional (in Spanish) (4 ed.). 9: 28–33.
  6. ↑ "LEY DE 12 DE JULIO DE 1941 de Sanidad Infantil y Maternal" (PDF). BOE (in Spanish). Madrid. 12 July 1941.
  7. ↑ "LA MUJER DURANTE EL FRANQUISMO". Biblioteca Gonzalo de Berceo (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Valiente Fernández, Celia (1997). "Las políticas de cuidado de los niños a nivel nacional en España (1975-1996)". Papers. Revista de Sociologia. 53: 101–136. doi: 10.5565/rev/papers.1898 . ISSN   0210-2862.
  9. 1 2 Herrera López, Sergio; López Fraile, Pilar (March 2013). "Infancia y salud mental pública en España: siglo XX y actualidad". Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría. 33 (117): 95–111. doi:10.4321/S0211-57352013000100007 (inactive 31 January 2024). ISSN   0211-5735.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)
  10. 1 2 Roth, Silke (2008-09-01). Gender Politics in the Expanding European Union: Mobilization, Inclusion, Exclusion. Berghahn Books. ISBN   9780857450708.
  11. ↑ Aguinaga Roustán, Josune and Domingo Comas Arnau, (1991). Infancia y adolescencia: la mirada de los adultos. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.
  12. ↑ de Pablo Masa, Antonio (1976). "La familia española en cambio." In Estudios sociológicos sobre la situación social de España. Ed. por Fundación Foessa, p. 345-405. Madrid: Euramérica.
  13. ↑ Iglesias de Ussel, Julio (1984). "La relación infancia y familia en España". Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, n. 27 (July–September): pp. 7-39.
  14. ↑ Franzway, Suzanne; Court, Dianne; Connell, R.W. (1989). Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. ↑ Threfall, Monica (1985). "The Women’s Movement in Spain". New Left Review. n. 151: 44-73
  16. ↑ Nash, Mary (1991). "Pronatalism and Mothehood in Franco’s Spain". In Maternity and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880s-1950s. Ed. Gisela Bock and Pat Thane, p. 160-177. London: Routledge.
  17. ↑ UCD (Unión de Centro Democrático) (1977, 1979). Elecciones generales, programas electorales.
  18. ↑ "Cambio en el rol de la mujer desde 1945" (in Spanish). 20 April 2015. Retrieved 2019-04-06.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.