International Quantum Communication Award (2010) Fellow of the American Physical Society (2012) Chancellor's Award for Distinguished Scholarship, UMass Boston (2021)
Christopher Alan Fuchs (born in Cuero, Texas) is an American theoretical physicist whose work focuses on quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics. He is a professor of physics at the University of Massachusetts Boston.[1][2] Fuchs is known for technical work in quantum information theory and for co-developing QBism,[3][4][5] an interpretation of quantum mechanics that radically departs from conventional approaches by treating quantum states as personal probability assignments an agent uses to calculate expectations about the outcomes of their own experimental interventions.
Fuchs' current work includes research into symmetric informationally complete measurements (SIC-POVMs), which QBism uses to represent quantum states as probability distributions in a framework where the Born rule appears as a modification of the classical law of total probability.
Since 2015 he has been a professor of physics at the University of Massachusetts Boston, where he leads a research group dedicated to quantum foundations and quantum information theory. The group works on the development and study of QBism and on the analysis of related mathematical structures, such as SIC-POVMs, used in probabilistic formulations of quantum mechanics.[1][14][15]
Early contributions to quantum information
In the field of quantum information theory, Fuchs has worked on measures of fidelity and distinguishability for quantum states, bounds on accessible information, and relations between disturbance and information in quantum measurements. Some of these results appear in his doctoral thesis and in later work on quantum cryptography and quantum communication.[16][17]
Fuchs and Jeroen van de Graaf introduced two-sided bounds connecting trace distance and fidelity, now called the Fuchs–van de Graaf inequalities. They are widely used in literature for converting error and fidelity bounds in the analysis of quantum protocols.[18][19]
In May 2000, when Fuchs was a postdoc at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, his home and most of his family's possessions were destroyed in the Cerro Grande Fire.[28] Fuchs had been actively corresponding over email with many prominent figures in the then-nascent field of quantum information. In an example of what he called "backing up my hard drive", he posted an edited collection of this correspondence to the arXiv preprint server, with a foreword by N. David Mermin. Later, Växjö University Press printed a limited edition of this collection, and in 2011, Cambridge University Press printed it (with a new introduction) under the title Coming of Age with Quantum Information.[29][30][31]
QBism is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that regards the theory as a tool for each agent to evaluate and update their expectations about the outcomes of their own actions on the world.[32][33][34] In this view, the quantum state is not understood as an objective property of a system, but as a mathematical expression of an agent’s beliefs about that system. From this perspective, quantum mechanics does not describe a reality independent of the observer; instead, it provides a normative framework for decision-making. In QBism, measurement is conceived as an action carried out by an agent upon the external world, with the outcome identified as the experience that action elicits for that agent. The outcome is not regarded as the disclosure of a pre-existing, observer-independent value, but as the product of a particular interaction between the agent and the system.[35][36][37] Within QBism, probability is treated in a subjectivist, personalist sense, in the tradition of de Finetti, with Dutch-book coherence used as a criterion of rationality. Coherence justifies the standard rules of probability as normative constraints on an agent's gambling commitments, while quantum theory adds further normative structure tailored to a quantum world.[38]
From the QBist point of view, a formalism was developed that allows standard quantum states to be replaced by the distributions associated with the outcomes of reference devices defined by informationally complete measurements.[39] Under this approach, quantum states are interpreted as expressions of belief. Within this framework, the Born rule is not interpreted as a law of nature that determines which outcomes occur, but as a normative rule: a constraint that an agent adopts in order to maintain internal coherence among their personal probability assignments. The rule links an agent's probability assignments for the outcomes of an informationally complete reference measurement with their assignments for the outcomes of any other possible measurement.[40][41][42]
This constraint takes its simplest form when the reference measurement is a symmetric informationally complete measurement (SIC-POVM),[43] a type of POVM first studied by Gerhard Zauner.[44] This makes SIC-POVMs of interest to the QBist program.[45][46][47]
Honors and awards
Fellow of the American Physical Society (2012), "for powerful theorems and lucid expositions" culminating in the vision of quantum theory known as QBism.[6]
QCMC International Quantum Communication Award (2010)[48][49][50]
The article "Unconditional Quantum Teleportation", co-authored with the group of H. J. Kimble,[51] was listed among the "Top Ten Breakthroughs of 1998" by the editors of Science.[52]
Chancellor's Award for Distinguished Scholarship, University of Massachusetts Boston, November 2021.[53]
↑Fuchs, Christopher A. (1995). Distinguishability and Accessible Information in Quantum Theory (PhD thesis). University of New Mexico. arXiv:quant-ph/9601020.
↑Bennett, C. H.; Fuchs, C. A.; Smolin, J. A. (1997). "Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication on a Noisy Quantum Channel". In Hirota, O.; Holevo, A. S.; Caves, C. M. (eds.). Quantum Communication, Computing and Measurement. Plenum Press. pp.79–88. arXiv:quant-ph/9611006.
↑Matsumoto, Keiji; Shimono, Toshiyuki; Winter, Andreas (2004). "Remarks on additivity of the Holevo channel capacity and of the entanglement of formation". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 246 (3): 427–442. doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0919-0.
↑Fuchs, Christopher A. (2011). Coming of Age with Quantum Information: Notes on a Paulian Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-19926-1.
↑Fuchs, Christopher A. (2023). "QBism, Where Next?". In Berghofer, Philipp; Wiltsche, Harald A. (eds.). Phenomenology and QBism: New Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Routledge. arXiv:2303.01446. doi:10.4324/9781003259008-4. ISBN9781003259008.
↑Fuchs, Christopher A. (2023). "Letters for Andrei: QBism and the Unfinished Nature of Nature". In Plotnitsky, Arkady; Haven, Emmanuel (eds.). The Quantum-Like Revolution: A Festschrift for Andrei Khrennikov. Springer. pp.61–90. arXiv:2109.08153. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12986-5_3. ISBN978-3-031-12986-5.
↑Fuchs, Christopher A.; Olshanii, Maxim; Weiss, Matthew B. (2021-12-01). "Quantum mechanics? It's all fun and games until someone loses an i". Asian Journal of Physics. 30 (12): 1701–1726. arXiv:2206.15343.
↑Weiss, Matthew B. (May 8, 2025). "Characterizing quantum state-space with a single quantum measurement". Physical Review A. 111 052205. arXiv:2412.13505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.052205.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.