Christopher Marte (born April 26,1989)[citation needed] is an American politician who is a member of the New York City Council for the 1st district,elected in November 2021.[1][2] He is a member of the Democratic Party.[3]
After graduating from college,Marte worked in finance for IBM. He then joined Arena,a Democratic-affiliated political action committee that trains candidates and campaign staffers. He later co-founded Neighbors United Below Canal,a non-profit organization.[7]
New York City Council
Marte ran for City Council in 2017,losing narrowly to incumbent Margaret Chin. He ran again in the 2021 Council elections,which were the first New York City elections to use ranked-choice voting. In the Democratic primary,Marte won 34.9% of the votes in the first round of voting and 60.5% of the votes in the final round.[8] Marte won 72.1% of the vote in the general election.
In 2023,Marte voted against a proposal to allow outdoor dining structures created during the COVID-19 pandemic to become permanent.[9]
In 2025,Marte's campaign website allegedly falsely claimed that he was endorsed by groups that had not officially endorsed his campaign.[10] The same year,Marte was criticized after video footage allegedly depicted Marte removing an opponent’s flyer from in front of an apartment.[11] Later that same year,Marte won the Democratic nomination during the primary for the 2025 New York City Council election.[12]
Housing
During his campaign for the City Council,Marte criticized incumbent council member Chin for voting to upzone NoHo and SoHo to permit 3,500 additional apartments,including 900 affordable housing units.[13]
In 2022,Marte filed a lawsuit to prevent the construction of four tower developments in Downtown Manhattan.[14][15]
In December 2024,Marte voted against City of Yes,legislation to rezone parts of New York City to allow for the conversion and construction of 80,000 new housing units across the city over a 15-year period.[16][17] Marte was the only councilmember representing a district in Manhattan to do so. He argued that the proposal was lacking a meaningful guarantee of new affordable housing,relying instead on incentives which do little historically to increase the affordable housing stock. [18][19][20]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
