Chrysler Chapter 11 reorganization

Last updated

Chrysler Chapter 11 reorganization was the petition for bankruptcy on April 30, 2009 of Chrysler car company and 24 of its affiliated subsidiaries with the federal bankruptcy court in New York. [1] [2] The court filing occurred upon failure of the company to come to an agreement with its creditors for an outside-of-bankruptcy restructuring plan, by the April 30 deadline mandated by the federal government.

Contents

Chrysler was impacted by the automotive industry crisis of 2008–2010 which had contributed the Chapter 11 reorganisation. At the time, Chrysler was controlled by the private investment company, Cerberus Capital Management, which, along with other investors, purchased a majority stake in 2007. [3]

Initial court proceedings

On Sunday, May 31, 2009, bankruptcy judge Arthur J. Gonzalez approved a proposed government restructuring plan and sale of Chrysler's assets. The sale allows most of the assets of Chrysler to be purchased by a new entity in which Fiat would own 20%, and the autoworker's union retirement health care trust (voluntary benefit association "VEBA") 55%, with the U.S. and Canadian government as minority stakeholders. Secured bondholders would receive 29 cents on the dollar for their claims. [4] The sale was appealed to the New York circuit court, which affirmed the sale on June 5, 2009. The dissident Indiana pension plan bondholders appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court to block the sale. The U.S. 2nd circuit appeals court stayed its decision, pending a response from the Supreme Court, until 4 pm, June 8, 2009. [4] [5]

On June 8, 2009, Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who handled emergency motions arising from the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit, in a one-sentence order, temporarily stayed the orders of the bankruptcy judge allowing the sale, pending further order by Justice Ginsburg or the Supreme Court. [6]

On June 9, 2009, the Supreme Court published its denial of the applications for a stay of the sale from the three Indiana funds, allowing the sale of assets to "New Chrysler" to proceed. [7] [8]

According to the two-page decision and order, the Indiana funds "have not carried the burden" of demonstrating that the Supreme Court needed to intervene. [7] The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a statement saying: "We are gratified that not a single court that reviewed this matter, including the U.S. Supreme, found any fault whatsoever with the handling of this matter by either Chrysler or the U.S. government." [7] The proposed sale of assets is scheduled to close on June 10, 2009, when the money to finance the deal is wired by the government. Fiat will receive equity in the New Chrysler through its contribution of automobile platforms as a base for a new line of Chrysler cars. [7]

On June 10, 2009, the sale of most of Chrysler assets to "New Chrysler", formally known as Chrysler Group LLC was completed. The federal government financed the deal with US$6.6 billion in financing, paid to the "Old Chrysler", formerly known as Chrysler LLC and currently named Old Carco LLC.

The transfer did not include eight manufacturing locations, nor many parcels of real estate, nor equipment leases. Contracts with 789 U.S. auto dealerships, that were being dropped, were not transferred. [9] [10]

Pre-bankruptcy negotiations with Fiat

On January 20, 2009, Fiat S.p.A. and Chrysler LLC announced that they had a non-binding term sheet to form a global alliance. Under the terms of the potential agreement, Fiat could take a 35% stake in Chrysler and gain access to its North American dealer network in exchange for providing Chrysler with the platform to build smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles in the U.S. and a reciprocal access to Fiat's global distribution network. [11]

Agreement with labor unions

By mid-April, as talks intensified between the two automakers to reach an agreement by a government-imposed deadline of April 30, Fiat's proposed initial stake was reported to be 20% with some influence on the structure of top management of the company. [12]

However, Fiat had warned that there would be no agreement if Chrysler failed to reach an agreement with the UAW and the Canadian Auto Workers' Union. On April 26, 2009, it appeared as if Chrysler had reached a deal with the unions which would meet federal requirements, though details were not made available. Chrysler said the union agreement "provides the framework needed to ensure manufacturing competitiveness and helps to meet the guidelines set forth by the U.S. Treasury Department." [13]

Bankruptcy filing

Chrysler filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection at the Federal Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York, on April 30, 2009, and announced an alliance with Fiat. [1] [14] [2] [15]

Both the White House and Chrysler expressed hope for a "surgical" bankruptcy lasting 30 to 60 days, with the result of reducing the company's liabilities and post-bankruptcy emergence in stronger financial shape. The submitted court documents indicated that there would be a reorganization plan presented to the court in 120 days, on August 28, 2009. A White House official indicated that the government would provide debtor-in-possession financing for between US$3 billion to US$3.5 billion, and upon a completion of Chrysler bankruptcy restructuring and court proceedings, the company would be eligible to receive up to US$4.5 billion in financing to resume operations, for total of US$8 billion of government support. Prior to the bankruptcy filing, Chrysler had received US$4.5 billion in financing from the U.S. government, under a George W. Bush administration plan, in December 2008, after Congress declined to approve legislation to provide federal loans. [2] [16] Between 2007 and 2012, Chrysler benefitted from $1.39 billion in local tax incentives. [17] [18]

A new company will be formed to acquire the assets of Chrysler, which will be known as New CarCo Acquisition LLC. [2]

Plant operations suspended

Chrysler announced on the day of the bankruptcy filing that during the restructuring it would cease most manufacturing operations on May 4, 2009, and resume production "when the transaction is completed, which is anticipated within 30 to 60 days." [2] [16]

On May 1, the two assembly plants in Canada, Brampton Assembly and Windsor Assembly, both located in Ontario, were shut down indefinitely. The shut downs affected about 2,700 and 4,400 employees respectively. A Chrysler parts plant in Etobicoke, Toronto operated until May 10, 2009, when it was shut down, affecting 300 employees.

Chrysler attorneys said eight of the company's factories, including five with a total of 4800 employees closing in 2010, would not be part of the Fiat deal. The company also announced the retirement of president and vice chairman Tom LaSorda.

Documents showed that the Sterling Heights, Michigan plant, the Detroit Conner Avenue plant and the St. Louis North plant would close, along with the Twinsburg, Ohio parts-stamping plant and the Kenosha, Wisconsin engine plant.

The St. Louis South plant and a Newark, Delaware plant were already closed and should not be sold to Fiat. Work from the Detroit axle plant, also not part of the Fiat deal, was moving to Port Huron, Michigan. The eight plants would be leased by "new Chrysler" and then closed in 2010. As many employees as possible would be offered jobs at other Chrysler plants. [19]

Initially approved motions

Federal bankruptcy judge Arthur J. Gonzalez approved six motions at a May 1 hearing. At the next hearing on May 4, attorneys were expected to ask Gonzalez for permission to use the $4.5 billion the company had already received from the U.S. and Canadian governments to let the company continue operations. Also expected at the same hearing was a request for a date to sell assets to "new Chrysler." No other bids were expected, but documents showed attempts at deals with dozens of companies, including Renault–Nissan, Toyota, Honda, Volkswagen and General Motors. Banks possessing 70 percent of Chrysler debt agreed to be paid 29 cents on the dollar. But some hedge funds and other creditors that failed to agree with proposed pre-bankruptcy restructuring of debt have yet to approve of the debt restructuring proposed in initial court bankruptcy motions. [19] A health care trust fund owned by the United Auto Workers is proposed to own a 55% stake in the new Chrysler. [20]

Procedure to sell assets approved

In a setback to the arguments of hold-out creditors, primarily made up of investment firms, Judge Gonzalez on May 5, 2009 approved proposed bidding procedures that would likely lead to Chrysler's sale of assets to an entity in which Fiat is a major owner. The lawyer for the dissident creditors holding US$300 million of a total US$6.9 billion of secured debt in Chrysler argued that proposed sale procedures preclude other potential bidders. The plan is for several major Chrysler assets to be sold to a new entity jointly owned by the United Automobile Workers Union health care trust fund, Fiat, and the United States and Canadian governments. [21] [22]

Dealership closures

On May 14, 2009 Chrysler filed with the bankruptcy court to terminate the dealership agreements of 789, or about 25% of its dealerships. [23]

Sale to "New Chrysler"

On Sunday, May 31, 2009, bankruptcy Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez approved a proposed plan, rejecting more than 300 filed objections to the sale. The sale allows of most of the assets of Chrysler to be purchased by new entity in which Fiat would own 20%, the autoworker's union retirement health care trust (voluntary benefit association "VEBA") 55%; the U.S. Government and Canadian government would be minority stakeholders. Secured bondholders would receive 29 cents on the dollar for their claims. [4] [5]

A group of dissident Indiana pension fund secured bondholders immediately appealed Gonzalez's decision, to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York; the appeal is known as Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler. The plaintiffs claimed that the Department of the Treasury treated Chrysler's secured creditors in a manner that is contrary to that called for under U.S. bankruptcy law, that it is the first time in the history of more than 150 years of American bankruptcy law when secured creditors received less than unsecured creditors, and that it violated the Fifth Amendment's clause that private property cannot be taken without due process of law. [24] The funds include teachers and police officers funds, holding about $42.5 million in face value of Chrysler's $6.9 billion (~$9.53 billion in 2023) in secured debt; the secured debt has priority for repayment. Holders of 92 percent of that class of debt agreed to a proposed government that would exchange debt for a value of 29 cents on the dollar. The Indiana funds obtained their bonds in July 2008 at 43 cents per the dollar of face value. [4] [5]

The federal appeals court on June 5, 2009 affirmed the decision to approve the sale of its assets, and gave objecting bondholders until Monday June 8, 2009 to obtain a stay of the re-affirmed decision permitting the sale to be completed. [4] [5]

On June 8, 2009, Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is assigned to emergency motions arising from the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit, in a one-sentence order, stayed the orders of the bankruptcy judge allowing the sale, pending further order by Justice Ginsburg or the Supreme Court. [6] Fiat had the right to withdraw from the deal if it does not close by June 15; however, the head of Fiat said it "would never walk away" from the Chrysler deal, even if it did not close by June 15. [25] According to U.S. government lawyers, Fiat walking away would leave Chrysler without a viable purchase plan and result in a likely liquidation. [6]

On June 9, 2009, the Supreme Court published its denial of the applications for a stay of the sale from the three Indiana funds, allowing the sale of assets to "New Chrysler" to proceed. [7] [8]

According to the two-page decision and order, the Indiana funds "have not carried the burden" of demonstrating that the Supreme Court needed to intervene. [7] The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a statement saying: "We are gratified that not a single court that reviewed this matter, including the U.S. Supreme, found any fault whatsoever with the handling of this matter by either Chrysler or the U.S. government." [7] The proposed sale of assets is scheduled to close on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, when the money to finance the deal is wired by the government. Fiat will receive equity in the New Chrysler through its contribution of automobile platforms as a base for a new line of Chrysler cars. [7]

On June 10, 2009, the sale of most of Chrysler assets to "New Chrysler", formally known as Chrysler Group LLC was completed. The federal government financed the deal with US$6.6 billion in financing, paid to the "Old Chrysler", formerly named Chrysler LLC and now currently named Old Carco LLC.

The transfer does not include eight manufacturing locations, nor many parcels of real estate, nor equipment leases. Contracts with 789 U.S. auto dealerships, which are being dropped, were not transferred. [9] [10]

Initial equity structure

Initially, the percentages of equity ownership in Fiat Chrysler Automobiles are: Fiat, 20 percent; U.S. government, 9.85 percent; Canadian government, 2.46 percent; and the UAW retiree medical fund 67.69 percent, according to bankruptcy court documents. [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

Fiat S.p.A., or Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino, was an Italian holding company whose original and core activities were in the automotive industry, and that was succeeded by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (FCA). The Fiat Group contained many brands such as Ferrari, Maserati, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, the Chrysler Group, and many more. On 29 January 2014, it was announced that Fiat S.p.A. was to be merged into a new Netherlands-based holding company Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (FCA), taking place before the end of 2014. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles became the new owner of Fiat Group. On 1 August 2014, Fiat S.p.A. received necessary shareholder approval to proceed with the merger. The merger became effective 12 October 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avaya</span> American technology company

Avaya LLC, often shortened to Avaya and formerly Avaya Inc., is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Morristown, New Jersey, that provides cloud communications and workstream collaboration services. The company's platform includes unified communications and contact center services. In 2019, the company provided services to 220,000 customer locations in 190 countries.

Debt restructuring is a process that allows a private or public company or a sovereign entity facing cash flow problems and financial distress to reduce and renegotiate its delinquent debts to improve or restore liquidity so that it can continue its operations.

Digicel is a Jamaican-based Caribbean mobile phone network and home entertainment provider operating in 25 markets worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trump Entertainment Resorts</span> Defunct gaming and hospitality company

Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. was a gambling and hospitality company. The company previously owned and operated the now-demolished Trump Plaza and Trump World's Fair, the now-closed Trump Marina, Trump Casino & Hotel in Gary, Indiana, Trump 29 in Coachella, California, and Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. It was founded in 1995 as Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts by Donald Trump, who after 2004 held only a minority ownership. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2004, 2009 and 2014. It became a subsidiary of Icahn Enterprises in 2016. Since then, all of the company's properties have been closed and sold.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dynegy</span> Electricity company based in Houston, Texas

Dynegy Inc. is an electric company based in Houston, Texas. It owns and operates a number of power stations in the U.S., all of which are natural gas-fueled or coal-fueled. Dynegy was acquired by Vistra Corp on April 9, 2018. The company is located at 601 Travis Street in Downtown Houston. The company was founded in 1984 as Natural Gas Clearinghouse. It was originally an energy brokerage, buying and selling natural gas supplies. It changed its name to NGC Corporation in 1995 after entering the electrical power generation business.

A bailout is the provision of financial help to a corporation or country which otherwise would be on the brink of bankruptcy. A bailout differs from the term bail-in under which the bondholders or depositors of global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFIs) are forced to participate in the recapitalization process but taxpayers are not. Some governments also have the power to participate in the insolvency process; for instance, the U.S. government intervened in the General Motors bailout of 2009–2013. A bailout can, but does not necessarily, avoid an insolvency process. The term bailout is maritime in origin and describes the act of removing water from a sinking vessel using a bucket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Argentine debt restructuring</span> Process following Argentinas Great Depression

The Argentine debt restructuring is a process of debt restructuring by Argentina that began on January 14, 2005, and allowed it to resume payment on 76% of the US$82 billion in sovereign bonds that defaulted in 2001 at the depth of the worst economic crisis in the nation's history. A second debt restructuring in 2010 brought the percentage of bonds under some form of repayment to 93%, though ongoing disputes with holdouts remained. Bondholders who participated in the restructuring settled for repayments of around 30% of face value and deferred payment terms, as well as warrants that paid investors based on annual economic growth as part of the same offer, and began to be paid punctually; the value of their nearly worthless bonds also began to rise. The remaining 7% of bondholders were later repaid 25% less than they were demanding, after centre-right and US-aligned leader Mauricio Macri came to power in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cerberus Capital Management</span> U.S. investment management company

Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. is an American global alternative investment firm with assets across credit, private equity, and real estate strategies. The firm is based in New York City, and run by Steve Feinberg, who co-founded Cerberus in 1992, with William L. Richter, who serves as a senior managing director. The firm has affiliate and advisory offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monaco Coach Corporation</span> Recreational vehicle (RV) brand

Monaco is a recreational vehicle (RV) brand, manufactured in Decatur, Indiana, and wholly owned by REV Recreation Group. Monaco holds a portfolio of Class A diesel motorhomes. REV Recreation Group is a subsidiary of REV Group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Effects of the 2008–2010 automotive industry crisis on the United States</span>

Beginning in the latter half of 2008, a global-scale recession adversely affected the economy of the United States. A combination of several years of declining automobile sales and scarce availability of credit led to a more widespread crisis in the United States auto industry in the years of 2008 and 2009.

The 2009 General Motors Chapter 11 sale of the assets of automobile manufacturer General Motors and some of its subsidiaries was implemented through Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code in the United States bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York. The United States government-endorsed sale enabled the NGMCO Inc. to purchase the continuing operational assets of the old GM. Normal operations, including employee compensation, warranties, and other customer services were uninterrupted during the bankruptcy proceedings. Operations outside of the United States were not included in the court filing.

Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLC was a lawsuit brought in United States federal court June 2009 by several pension funds against Chrysler LLC and the United States Department of the Treasury, to block the planned sale of Chrysler LLC assets to a "New Chrysler" entity in the Chrysler bankruptcy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Chrysler</span>

The history of Chrysler involves engineering innovations, high finance, wide alternations of profits and losses, various mergers and acquisitions, and multinationalization. Chrysler, a large automobile manufacturer, was founded in the 1920s and continues under the name Stellantis North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motors Liquidation Company</span> American automotive company

Motors Liquidation Company (MLC), formerly General Motors Corporation, was the company left to settle past liability claims from Chapter 11 reorganization of American car manufacturer General Motors. It exited bankruptcy on March 31, 2011, only to be carved into four trusts; the first to settle the claims of unsecured creditors, the second to handle environmental response for MLC's remaining assets, a third to handle present and future asbestos-related claims, and a fourth for litigation claims.

<i>Companies Creditors Arrangement Act</i> Canadian Act of Parliament

The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act is a statute of the Parliament of Canada that allows insolvent corporations owing their creditors in excess of $5 million to restructure their businesses and financial affairs.

<i>Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v United Steelworkers</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v United Steelworkers, 2013 SCC 6, arising from the Ontario courts as Re Indalex Limited, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that deals with the question of priorities of claims in proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, and how they intersect with the fiduciary duties employers have as administrators of pension plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Detroit bankruptcy</span> 2013 municipal bankruptcy filing by the City of Detroit, Michigan, United States

The city of Detroit, Michigan, filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy on July 18, 2013. It is the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in U.S. history by debt, estimated at $18–20 billion, exceeding Jefferson County, Alabama's $4-billion filing in 2011. Detroit is also the largest city by population in U.S. history to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy, more than twice as large as Stockton, California, which filed in 2012. While Detroit's population had declined from a peak of 1.8 million in 1950, its July 2013 population was reported by The New York Times as a city of 700,000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greylock Capital Management</span>

Greylock Capital Management, LLC is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registered alternative investment adviser that invests globally in high yield, undervalued, and distressed assets worldwide, particularly in emerging and frontier markets. The firm was founded in 2004 by Hans Humes from a portfolio of emerging market assets managed by Humes while at Van Eck Global. AJ Mediratta joined the firm in 2008 from Bear Stearns and serves as its president.

Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that appointments to the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico are not subject to the restrictions in the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that all officers of the United States are subject to the Appointments Clause even if their duties relate to Puerto Rico. However, the power they exercise must be primarily federal in nature for the Clause to apply. If the officer exercises powers primarily of a local nature, even if created by federal law, then the officer is not "of the United States" and is exempt from compliance with the Clause. As members of the Board are primarily concerned with the governance of Puerto Rico, even though their decisions have potentially nationwide consequences, their powers are primarily local in nature and need not be appointed in compliance with the Clause.

References

  1. 1 2 Epiq Systems – Chrysler Restructuring Archived January 19, 2013, at archive.today (Access to Chrysler LLC press releases and court filings. The original bankruptcy filing papers indicate Chrysler is a client of Epiq systems, which is apparently managing the bankruptcy documents process.)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Chrysler Bankruptcy Filing" (PDF). The New York Times. April 30, 2009. Retrieved May 1, 2009. The bankruptcy filing and related documents submitted by Chrysler to the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York. On page 4 and 5 of the bankruptcy petition, the list of subsidiaries was included with the consolidated petition:
    Chrysler LLC Case No.: 09-50002
    Related Debtors:
    Chrysler Aviation Inc. Case No.: 09-50003
    Chrysler Dutch Holding LLC Case No.: 09-50004
    Chrysler Dutch Investment LLC Case No.: 09-50005
    Chrysler Dutch Operating Group LLC Case No.: 09-50006
    Chrysler Institute of Engineering Case No.: 09-50007
    Chrysler International Corporation Case No.: 09-50008
    Chrysler International Limited, LLC Case No.: 09-50009
    Chrysler International Services, S.A. Case No.: 09-50010
    Chrysler Motors LLC Case No.: 09-50011
    Chrysler Realty Company LLC Case No.: 09-50000
    Chrysler Service Contracts Inc. Case No.: 09-50013
    Chrysler Service Contracts Florida, Inc. Case No.: 09-50012
    Chrysler Technologies Middle East Ltd. Case No.: 09-50014
    Chrysler Transport Inc. Case No.: 09-50015
    Chrysler Vans LLC Case No.: 09-50016
    DCC 929, Inc. Case No.: 09-50017
    Dealer Capital, Inc. Case No.: 09-50018
    Global Electric Motorcars, LLC Case No.: 09-50019
    NEV Mobile Service, LLC Case No.: 09-50020
    NEV Service, LLC Case No.: 09-50021
    Peapod Mobility LLC Case No.: 09-50001
    TPF Asset, LLC Case No.: 09-50022
    TPF Note, LLC Case No.: 09-50023
    Utility Assets LLC Case No.: 09-50024
  3. ↑ Story, Louise (December 5, 2008). "Chrysler's friends in high places". The New York Times. Retrieved May 3, 2009.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 de la MERCED, Michael J (June 5, 2009). "Appeals Court Refuses to Block Chrysler's Sale". The New York Times. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Supreme Court Asked to Block Chrysler Deal". The New York Times. Associated Press. June 6, 2009. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
  6. 1 2 3 de la MERCED, Michael J (June 8, 2009). "Supreme Court Delays Sale of Chrysler to Fiat". The New York Times. Retrieved June 8, 2009.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 de la Merced, Michael J. (June 9, 2009). "Supreme Court Clears Way for the Sale of Chrysler to Fiat". The New York Times. Retrieved June 9, 2009.
  8. 1 2 per Curiam (June 9, 2009). "Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al, v Chrysler LLC, et al, On Applications for Stay" (PDF). Slip Opinion. Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court (via New York Times). Retrieved June 9, 2009.
  9. 1 2 de la Mercel, Michael; Micheline Maynard (June 10, 2009). "Swift Overhaul Moves Ahead as Fiat Acquires Chrysler Assets". The New York Times. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  10. 1 2 Forden, Sara Gay; Mike Ramsey (June 10, 2009). "Fiat Said to Buy Chrysler Assets Today to Form New Automaker". Bloomberg. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  11. ↑ Krisher, Tom (January 20, 2009). "Fiat deal could give Chrysler small-car technology". Associated Press. Archived from the original (URL) on February 15, 2009. Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  12. ↑ Kim, Soyoung (April 13, 2009). "Chrysler, Fiat discuss new management and board: report". Reuters. Retrieved April 30, 2009.
  13. ↑ Chrysler and Union Agree to Deal Before Federal Deadline. The New York Times, April 26, 2009. Retrieved April 27, 2009.
  14. ↑ Gupta, Poornima (February 9, 2009). "WRAPUP 12-Chrysler files for bankruptcy; inks Fiat deal". Reuters. Archived from the original on May 3, 2009. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  15. ↑ Office of the Press Secretary (April 30, 2009). "Obama Administration Auto Restructuring Initiative; Chrysler-Fiat Alliance". whitehouse.gov . Retrieved May 5, 2009– via National Archives.
  16. 1 2 Maynard, Micheline (May 1, 2009). "'Surgical' Bankruptcy Is Set for Chrysler". The New York Times. Retrieved May 1, 2009.
  17. ↑ "As Companies Seek Tax Deals, Governments Pay High Price". The New York Times . December 1, 2012. Retrieved May 29, 2016.
  18. ↑ "UNITED STATES OF SUBSIDIES, Chrysler". The New York Times . December 1, 2012. Retrieved May 29, 2016.
  19. 1 2 "Deal's first steps begin – Chrysler will sell its assets to Fiat; five plants to close". May 2, 2009. Archived from the original on December 2, 2014. Retrieved May 2, 2009.
  20. ↑ de la Merced, Michael J. (April 30, 2009). "Dealbook: A Road Map to a Chrysler Bankruptcy". The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  21. ↑ de la Merced, Michael; Jonathan D. Glater (May 5, 2009). "Plan to Sell Chrysler to Fiat Clears Bar". The New York Times. Retrieved May 6, 2009.
  22. ↑ Sorkin, Andrew Ross, ed. (May 6, 2009). "Meet the Chrysler Holdouts". The New York Times. Retrieved May 6, 2009.
  23. ↑ Valdes-Dapena, Peter (May 14, 2009). "Chrysler closing 789 dealerships". CNN Money. Retrieved May 16, 2009.
  24. ↑ Interview With Richard Mourdock Archived January 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , Human Events, June 1, 2009
  25. ↑ Savage, David G.; Jim Puzzanghera (June 8, 2009). "Chrysler sale to Fiat stalled by Supreme Court". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved June 9, 2009.[ permanent dead link ]
  26. ↑ Globe Wire Services (June 11, 2009). "Fiat seals deal for Chrysler stake". Boston Globe. Retrieved June 11, 2009.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.