Constitutional history

Last updated

Constitutional history is the area of historical study covering both written constitutions and uncodified constitutions, and became an academic discipline during the 19th century. The Oxford Companion to Law (1980) defined it as the study of the "origins, evolution and historical development" of the constitution of a community. [1]

Contents

The English term is attributed to Henry Hallam, in his 1827 work The Constitutional History of England. [2] It overlaps legal history and political history. For uncodified constitutions, the status of documents seen as contributing to the formation of a constitution has an aspect of diplomatics.

By the beginning of the 20th century, constitutional history, associated strongly with the "Victorian manner" in historiography, had come under criticism that questioned its relevance. [3] Both before and after the period of so-called "traditional constitutional history" in the English-speaking world, its themes in political history have been seriously contested.

See Category:Constitutional history.

Overview of national constitutional histories

European background

In the European tradition, Pocock in his book on the ancient constitution of England argued a common pattern, seen in François Hotman, a French lawyer of the 16th century, of valuing customary law, in tension with a code of law, and taking support for the customary to the point of creating a "historical myth" around it. Historical priority had political consequences for monarchy. [4]

The status of monarchy in Europe played a large part in its constitutional history until the end of World War I. Shortly after 1918, the surviving European monarchies, diminished in numbers, were all examples of the constitutional monarchy, and the constitutions involved were all written, with the exception of the British monarchy which is part of an uncodified constitution. [5] Mark Mazower states that "Most of the new constitutions began by stressing their democratic, national and republican character." [6]

Category:Constitutional history of Austria

North American constitutions

The constitution of the United States, as a historical research area, was considered to be in decline by Menard in 1971, citing also George Athan Billias and Eric Cantor. [7] Harry N. Scheiber in 1981 noted that some historians in the field saw a "genuine crisis", which he reported was widely attributed to competition from newer approaches in legal history to the behaviour of law courts. [8] At this time there was a view that constitutional history was linked to liberalism and individual rights, and in tension with critical legal studies and its approach to legal history. [9] Lewis Henry LaRue, from the side of critical legal studies, in 1987 defended the proposition that constitutional law should be studied in the context of constitutional history. [10]

Category:Constitutional history of the United States

Constitutional courts

Many nations have a constitutional court deciding matters of constitutional law. The force of judgements in such a court may be erga omnes , in other words applying broadly, rather than just to the case in question. [11] Theodore Y. Blumoff writing of the Supreme Court of the United States stated that "Through its decisions and resulting precedents, the Court makes history as it decides it." [12]

Ancient Greece and Rome

The political history of Athens after the Peisistratids (from about 510 BCE onwards) is amply documented in literary sources, and has traditionally been cast as an evolution away from the tyrant (absolute ruler). [13] John Robert Seeley in the 19th century took the major difference constitutionally between ancient Athens of that period and the Roman Republic to be that the Roman Senate, controlled by the patricians, was a deliberative assembly, while the assemblies of the plebeians were not. [14]

De re publica , a partially-recovered work by Cicero, contains some political and constitutional history of the Roman Republic about three decades before its end. It used the concept of a mixed constitution going back to Aristotle, and its evolution. [15] In Cicero's view an "ancestral constitution", an organic development based on the mos maiorum , had been ruptured some eighty years before, by the Gracchi and their reforms. [16]

Category:Ancient Greek constitutions

Medieval Christendom

From the High Middle Ages in Western Europe, the effective diplomacy of the Papacy, itself regulated by canon law, played a large part in the constitution of Latin Christendom as a polity, for example in the Crusades. The secular constitution of the Holy Roman Empire was uncodified. Its background was studied in depth in the 19th century by Georg Waitz, considered the effective founder of the German Verfassungsgeschichte, as part of legal history. His eight-volume work Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte covered the period from the 9th to 12th centuries. The school of Waitz and Heinrich Brunner was later challenged by the "new constitutional history" of Theodor Mayer (de:Theodor Mayer (Historiker)), Otto Brunner and Walter Schlesinger. [17]

The three-volume Constitutional History of England (1874–78) by William Stubbs was influenced by German scholars, particularly Waitz and Georg Ludwig von Maurer. [18] The history of Anglo-Saxon England had standing in the Victorian period, to substantiate claims that the Westminster parliament descended from the witangemot and free assemblies. [19]

Karl Leyser in the 1980s criticised the type of institutional history given of the Ottonian period Empire, on the grounds that it assumed without sufficient justification that such institutions existed in an operational sense. [20] He also argued that parallels drawn between Germany and Anglo-Saxon England of the tenth century were ultimately quite misleading. [21] Timothy Reuter in 2002 stated in this context that "constitutional history in the old style has clearly gone out of fashion." [22]

Whig history and constitutional history in the university

According to the final volume of The Cambridge Modern History (1910), Hallam's Constitutional History of England of 1827 contains the "authoritative Whig presentation of modern English history", and it "immediately took its place as a textbook in the Universities". The context is a contrast with the conservative History of Europe of Archibald Alison, which pointed to the French Revolution and the dangers of political change. [23]

From the 1860s there were in the English-speaking world professors of constitutional history, with Cosmo Innes at Edinburgh becoming one, by change of official title, in 1862. [24] Francis Lieber was Professor of Constitutional History at Columbia College Law School in the US from 1865. [25] He lectured on The Rise of Our Constitution. He recommended reading for the Bill of Rights 1689, which he took to be foundational for the US Constitution, from Edward Shepherd Creasy's Rise and Progress of the English Constitution, then Hallam's book, then from an annotated edition of Jean-Louis de Lolme's work on the English constitution, before the legal works of William Blackstone and others. [26]

With the work of Stubbs, succeeded by Samuel Rawson Gardiner as an author of British constitutional history derived from close reading of documents (traditional diplomatics), it played a central role in British historiography. [27] During this period of "traditional constitutional history", the Second British Empire expanded, but its history initially was kept separate. The Whigs of the 18th century had often been supporters of American independence. Radicals of the 19th century distrusted imperial thinking. [28]

In the twentieth century, Gardiner's approach was attacked by Roland Greene Usher (1880–1957), and both Herbert Butterfield and Lewis Namier rejected the tradition. [27] The interwar period was, however, still a time when the history of the British Empire was very largely taught through constitutional history. A representative figure is the historian Kenneth Wheare. [29] Butterfield, who coined the term "Whig history" as a criticism, by the period of World War II saw the imperial or "Tory" history as inseparable from it. [28]

Notes

  1. ↑ Walker, David Maxwell (1980). The Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford University Press. p. 279. ISBN   978-0-19-866110-8.
  2. ↑ Brundage, Anthony Leon (6 October 2015). British Historians and National Identity: From Hume to Churchill. Routledge. p. 207. ISBN   978-1-317-31711-1.
  3. ↑ Blaas, P. B. M. (1978). Continuity and Anachronism: Parliamentary and Constitutional Development in Whig Historiography and in the Anti-Whig Reaction Between 1890 and 1930. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 36. ISBN   978-94-009-9712-7.
  4. ↑ Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14–17. ISBN   978-0-521-31643-9.
  5. ↑ Bogdanor, Vernon (1997). The Monarchy and the Constitution. Clarendon Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN   978-0-19-829334-7.
  6. ↑ Mazower, Mark (1999). Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century. Penguin. p. 6. ISBN   978-0-14-028387-7.
  7. ↑ Menard, Edward J. (1971). "Constitutional History: Past and Present". The History Teacher. 5 (1): 5–6. doi:10.2307/491895. ISSN   0018-2745. JSTOR   491895.
  8. ↑ Scheiber, Harry N. (September 1981). "American Constitutional History and the New Legal History: Complementary Themes in Two Modes". The Journal of American History. 68 (2): 337–350. doi:10.2307/1889976. ISSN   0021-8723. JSTOR   1889976.
  9. ↑ Nelson, William E.; Reid, John Phillip (1985). The Literature of American Legal History. Beard Books. p. 287. ISBN   978-1-58798-280-4.
  10. ↑ LaRue, Lewis Henry (1987). "Constitutional Law and Constitutional History". Buffalo Law Review. 36.
  11. ↑ Law, European Commission for Democracy through (1994-01-01). The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Consolidation of the Rule of Law: Proceedings of the UniDem Seminar Organised in Bucharest on 8-10 June 1994 in Co-operation with the Romanian Constitutional Court with the Support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania. Council of Europe. p. 76. ISBN   978-92-871-2649-8.
  12. ↑ Hall, Kermit L. (1992). The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Oxford University Press. p. 373. ISBN   978-0-19-505835-2.
  13. ↑ Lewis, Sian (2006). Ancient Tyranny. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 6–7. ISBN   978-0-7486-2643-4.
  14. ↑ Seeley, John Robert, ed. (1881). Livy, Book I. Clarendon Press. p. 70.
  15. ↑ Forsythe, Gary (2005). A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. University of California Press. p. 74. ISBN   978-0-520-94029-1.
  16. ↑ Wood, Neal (1991). Cicero's Social and Political Thought. University of California Press. p. 163. ISBN   978-0-520-07427-9.
  17. ↑ Rogers, Clifford J.; DeVries, Kelly; France, John (2012). Journal of Medieval Military History: Volume X. Vol. X. Boydell Press. p. 18 note 3. ISBN   978-1-84383-747-3.
  18. ↑ Steinberg, Oded Y. (2019). Race, Nation, History: Anglo-German Thought in the Victorian Era. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 83. ISBN   978-0-8122-5137-1.
  19. ↑ Cannon, John; Crowcroft, Robert (2015-10-15). The Oxford Companion to British History. Oxford University Press. p. 33. ISBN   978-0-19-104481-6.
  20. ↑ Reuter, Timothy (2006-11-02). Medieval Polities and Modern Mentalities. Cambridge University Press. p. 194. ISBN   978-1-139-45954-9.
  21. ↑ Reuter, Timothy (2006-11-02). Medieval Polities and Modern Mentalities. Cambridge University Press. pp. 284–5. ISBN   978-1-139-45954-9.
  22. ↑ Reuter, Timothy (2006-11-02). Medieval Polities and Modern Mentalities. Cambridge University Press. p. 436. ISBN   978-1-139-45954-9.
  23. ↑ Ward, Stanley Leathes, G. W. (George Walter) Prothero, Sir Adolphus William (1910). The Cambridge Modern History. Vol. 10. CUP Archive. p. 837.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ↑ Marsden, Richard A. "Innes, Cosmo Nelson". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/14428.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  25. ↑ Adams, Herbert Baxter (1887). The Study of History in American Colleges and Universities. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 66.
  26. ↑ Lieber, Francis (1881). The Miscellaneous Writings of Francis Lieber. Vol. II. J.B. Lippincott. p. 80. ISBN   978-0-608-41381-5.
  27. 1 2 Cannon, John; Crowcroft, Robert (2015-10-15). The Oxford Companion to British History. Oxford University Press. pp. 234–235. ISBN   978-0-19-104481-6.
  28. 1 2 Armitage, David; David, Armitage (2001). The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN   978-0-521-78978-3.
  29. ↑ Winks, Robin, ed. (2001). The Oxford History of the British Empire: Volume V: Historiography. Vol. V. OUP Oxford. p. ii. ISBN   978-0-19-164769-7.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution</span> Fundamental principles that govern a state

A constitution is the aggregate of fundamental principles or established precedents that constitute the legal basis of a polity, organization or other type of entity, and commonly determines how that entity is to be governed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional monarchy</span> Form of government

Constitutional monarchy, also known as limited monarchy, parliamentary monarchy or democratic monarchy, is a form of monarchy in which the monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and is not alone in making decisions. Constitutional monarchies differ from absolute monarchies in that they are bound to exercise powers and authorities within limits prescribed by an established legal framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Canada</span>

The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law in Canada. It outlines Canada's system of government and the civil and human rights of those who are citizens of Canada and non-citizens in Canada. Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples, uncodified traditions and conventions. Canada is one of the oldest constitutional monarchies in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historiography</span> Study of the methods of historians

Historiography is the study of the methods of historians in developing history as an academic discipline, and by extension is any body of historical work on a particular subject. The historiography of a specific topic covers how historians have studied that topic by using particular sources, techniques, and theoretical approaches. Scholars discuss historiography by topic—such as the historiography of the United Kingdom, that of WWII, the pre-Columbian Americas, early Islam, and China—and different approaches and genres, such as political history and social history. Beginning in the nineteenth century, with the development of academic history, there developed a body of historiographic literature. The extent to which historians are influenced by their own groups and loyalties—such as to their nation state—remains a debated question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ottoman Empire</span> Turkish empire (1299–1922)

The Ottoman Empire, historically and colloquially known as the Turkish Empire, was an empire that controlled much of Southeast Europe, West Asia, and North Africa between the 14th and early 20th centuries. The empire also controlled parts of southeastern Central Europe from the early 16th to the early 18th century.

Absolute monarchy is a form of monarchy in which the monarch rules in their own right or power. In an absolute monarchy, the king or queen is by no means limited and has absolute power. Often such monarchies are hereditary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Canada</span>

The legal system of Canada is pluralist: its foundations lie in the English common law system, the French civil law system, and Indigenous law systems developed by the various Indigenous Nations.

Whig history is an approach to historiography that presents history as a journey from an oppressive and benighted past to a "glorious present". The present described is generally one with modern forms of liberal democracy and constitutional monarchy: it was originally a satirical term for the patriotic grand narratives praising Britain's adoption of constitutional monarchy and the historical development of the Westminster system. The term has also been applied widely in historical disciplines outside of British history to describe "any subjection of history to what is essentially a teleological view of the historical process". When the term is used in contexts other than British history, "whig history" (lowercase) is preferred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meiji Constitution</span> Constitution of the Empire of Japan, in effect from 1890 to 1947

The Constitution of the Empire of Japan, known informally as the Meiji Constitution, was the constitution of the Empire of Japan which was proclaimed on February 11, 1889, and remained in force between November 29, 1890, and May 2, 1947. Enacted after the Meiji Restoration in 1868, it provided for a form of mixed constitutional and absolute monarchy, based jointly on the German and British models. In theory, the Emperor of Japan was the supreme leader, and the Cabinet, whose Prime Minister would be elected by a Privy Council, were his followers; in practice, the Emperor was head of state but the Prime Minister was the actual head of government. Under the Meiji Constitution, the Prime Minister and his Cabinet were not necessarily chosen from the elected members of parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A. V. Dicey</span> British jurist and constitutional theorist (1835–1922)

Albert Venn Dicey, was a British Whig jurist and constitutional theorist. He is most widely known as the author of Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885). The principles it expounds are considered part of the uncodified British constitution. He became Vinerian Professor of English Law at Oxford, one of the first Professors of Law at the LSE Law School, and a leading constitutional scholar of his day. Dicey popularised the phrase "rule of law", although its use goes back to the 17th century.

The Radical Whigs were a group of British political commentators associated with the British Whig faction who were at the forefront of the Radical movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whiggism</span> Political philosophy

Whiggism is a political philosophy that grew out of the Parliamentarian faction in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651). The Whigs advocated the supremacy of Parliament, tolerance of Protestant dissenters, and opposition to a "Papist" on the throne, especially James II or his descendants. It is associated with early conservative liberalism.

Mixed government is a form of government that combines elements of democracy, aristocracy and monarchy, ostensibly making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived in Aristotle's Politics as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny. The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vernon Bogdanor</span> British political scientist

Sir Vernon Bernard Bogdanor is a British political scientist, historian, and research professor at the Institute for Contemporary British History at King's College London. He is also emeritus professor of politics and government at the University of Oxford and an emeritus fellow of Brasenose College, Oxford.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of South Africa</span> Legal system of the Republic of South Africa

South Africa has a 'hybrid' or 'mixed' legal system, formed by the interweaving of a number of distinct legal traditions: a civil law system inherited from the Dutch, a common law system inherited from the British, and a customary law system inherited from indigenous Africans. These traditions have had a complex interrelationship, with the English influence most apparent in procedural aspects of the legal system and methods of adjudication, and the Roman-Dutch influence most visible in its substantive private law. As a general rule, South Africa follows English law in both criminal and civil procedure, company law, constitutional law and the law of evidence; while Roman-Dutch common law is followed in the South African contract law, law of delict (tort), law of persons, law of things, family law, etc. With the commencement in 1994 of the interim Constitution, and in 1997 its replacement, the final Constitution, another strand has been added to this weave.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of rights</span> Proclamation of fundamental rights to citizens of a polity

A bill of rights, sometimes called a declaration of rights or a charter of rights, is a list of the most important rights to the citizens of a country. The purpose is to protect those rights against infringement from public officials and private citizens.

Constitutionalism is "a compound of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law".

The ancient constitution of England was a 17th-century political theory about the common law, and the antiquity of the House of Commons, used at the time in particular to oppose the royal prerogative. It was developed initially by Sir Edward Coke, in his law reports; and has been analysed in modern times by J. G. A. Pocock in The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. This is not to be conflated with Bancroft-Prize-winner Mary Sarah Bilder's "transatlantic constitution."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Indian law</span>

Law in India primarily evolved from customary practices and religious prescriptions in the Indian subcontinent, to the modern well-codified acts and laws based on a constitution in the Republic of India. The various stages of evolution of Indian law is classified as that during the Vedic period, the Islamic period, the British period and post independence.

An uncodified constitution is a type of constitution where the fundamental rules often take the form of customs, usage, precedent and a variety of statutes and legal instruments. An understanding of the Constitution is obtained through reading commentary by the judiciary, government committees or legal experts. In such a constitutional system, all these elements may be recognized by courts, legislators and the bureaucracy as binding upon government and limiting its powers. Such a framework is sometimes imprecisely called an "unwritten constitution"; however, all the elements of an uncodified constitution are typically written down in a variety of official documents, though not codified in a single document.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.