Crown-Ikarus 286

Last updated

Crown-Ikarus 286
Crown-Ikarus bus of Tri-Met, Portland.jpg
TriMet #744, a 1982 Crown-Ikarus 286 in Portland, Oregon, in 1993
Overview
Type transit bus
Manufacturer Ikarus
Crown Coach Corporation
Production1980–1986
Assembly Budapest, Hungary (initial assembly)
Final Assembly: Los Angeles, California (final completion)
Body and chassis
Body style Articulated bus
Layout Mid-mounted engine/"puller" (6x2)
Doors2 or 3
Floor typeHigh floor
Chassissemi self-supporting with subframe
Related Orion-Ikarus 286/Orion III
Powertrain
Engine Cummins 855 cu in (14 L) NHHTC inline-6
Transmission 4-speed Allison HT740 automatic
Voith D864.2 automatic
Dimensions
Length55 ft (17 m; 660 in)
60 ft (18 m; 720 in)
Chronology
Successor NABI (Ikarus) 436

The Crown-Ikarus 286 is a type of transit bus that was manufactured for the U.S. market from 1980 until 1986, under a joint venture between the Ikarus Body and Coach Works (Ikarus), of Budapest, Hungary, and Crown Coach Corporation from Los Angeles, California in the United States. Loosely based on the Ikarus 280, the Crown-Ikarus 286 is a high-floor articulated bus.

Contents

Due to their use in the United States, the Crown-Ikarus buses became the first buses produced by Ikarus equipped with an onboard wheelchair lift. [1]

After a number of production problems arose, [2] the Crown-Ikarus 286 ended production in 1986, following the collapse of the joint venture. [3] [4] A total of 243 buses were produced for nine different operators. [3]

Ikarus would again jointly produce the Ikarus 280 in North America with Ontario Bus Industries, in Canada, as the Orion III.

Background

In the late 1970s, the era of the "New Look" mass-transit buses in the United States and Canada, which had begun in the late 1950s, was coming to a close. The two largest U.S. bus manufacturers, General Motors and Flxible, ended U.S. production of their New Look buses in 1977 and 1978, respectively. By the end of the decade, production would shift from a GM/Flxible near-monopoly to a contested segment, with a number of manufacturers competing for transit operators with new-generation bus designs.

To diversify its business beyond the fragile school bus industry of the late 1970s, California-based Crown Coach sought to enter transit bus production. While its chief competitor Gillig Corporation began design work on what would become the Gillig Phantom in 1982, Crown did not have the resources on its own to develop its own design from the ground up.[ citation needed ] In 1979, Crown entered into a partnership with Hungarian bus manufacturer Ikarus Body and Coach Works.

With an annual production of 13,000 transit vehicles (triple the combined output of all U.S. transit manufacturers), Ikarus was one of the largest bus manufacturers in the world, [1] [2] but had never previously built any vehicles for the U.S. market. [2] In addition to Crown Coach gaining entry into the mass-transit segment, the partnership allowed Hungary to obtain hard currency and eased a trade imbalance between Eastern Europe and the West. [2]

Under the terms of the joint venture, final assembly of the buses would be done in Crown Coach facilities in Los Angeles. In addition to finishing the vehicles to American standards, the final assembly in California involved most of the interior work, allowing customization of the buses to the needs of each end-user. Alongside various specifications for seating design, this allowed for the inclusion of features such as wheelchair lifts for passengers with disabilities. [2]

Sales contracts of the vehicles were managed by Crown Coach, which helped ensure that the work satisfied U.S. federal "Buy America" requirements [2] ( 49 U.S.C.   § 5323j ). All buses manufactured under the Crown-Ikarus name were considered model 286, although different orders carried a seldom-noted numerical suffix (such as 286.02 for Portland TriMet).

Production history

View of left side and rear of a 60-foot Crown-Ikarus bus Tri-Met Crown-Ikarus articulated bus, side-rear view, in Sep. 1982.jpg
View of left side and rear of a 60-foot Crown-Ikarus bus

The first order for the Crown-Ikarus was placed in November 1979. [5] In its Budapest factory, Ikarus produced the body shells of its Ikarus 280 articulated transit bus modified for the North American market. The largest change was the overall width of the bodyshell, from a metric-based 98.4 inches (2,500 mm) to the 102 inches (2,591 mm) body width that was becoming common in transit buses in North America. After shipment to Crown Coach in Los Angeles, the fabricated body shells were fitted with engines, transmissions and brakes. Other major assemblies included the destination signs and interior. [1] For the first vehicles, the engines and transmissions were shipped to Hungary for installation, but subsequent examples saw the entire powertrain fitted at the Crown Coach factory. [5]

Two different configurations of the Crown-Ikarus 286 were sold: 55-foot (16.8 m) and 60-foot (18.3 m) lengths, with either two or three entry doors. Aside from five Houston Metro examples fitted in a 61-seat suburban configuration, all versions were fitted with transit-style seats. In its 60-foot configuration, the passenger capacity was 73. [3]

To save on development costs, the Crown-Ikarus was fitted with the engines of the Crown Supercoach school bus, which was designed for a 20-year service life. The first examples of the Crown-Ikarus 286 used a 290 hp Cummins NHHTC underfloor diesel engine, changed to a 300 hp Cummins NHHTC in later versions. [5] An optional 350 hp Cummins was chosen by the Milwaukee County Transit System. [5] Most vehicles were fitted with an Allison automatic transmission (models HT-747D or 748s). [5] However, a Voith D864.2 automatic transmission was fitted for vehicles operated in Houston, and for five of 40 purchased by Milwaukee. [5] The axles were also U.S.-made. [6]

In the mid- to late 1980s, TriMet replaced the Cummins engines in its Crown-Ikarus buses with Detroit Diesel DDA 6-71 engines in an effort to improve reliability and reduce maintenance costs by standardizing with the rest of the agency's fleet. [7] [8]

Ikarus also hoped to sell a trolleybus version of the 286 in North America through Crown Coach. [9] With this in mind, an Ikarus 280T3 articulated trolleybus was transported to North America, and in 1981–1982 was demonstrated on the Mexico City, [10] San Francisco, [11] and Seattle trolleybus systems. [12] Ultimately, no orders were received, and Crown Coach did not build any trolleybuses.

Post-production issues

Various problems were experienced with the completed buses during their use, including doors malfunctioning and windows coming out. [2] In Portland, Oregon, which had more Crown-Ikarus buses than any other transit system, owner Tri-Met found that its 87 buses needed numerous repairs and modifications, to fix what it considered to be significant defects. [13] [14] The agency worked with the manufacturer to correct many of them, but carried out some of the repairs and modifications itself, sometimes at its own expense. [15] In 1985, when the buses involved were three to four years old, Tri-Met filed a lawsuit against the manufacturers, alleging breach of contract. [13] The suit identified 45 separate defects, including frame cracks, and charged that Crown Coach and Ikarus had been unable or unwilling to correct all of them. [13] [14] Tri-Met officials said the problems and frequent breakdowns of the buses led to there being days when only about 50 of the 87 buses were operational. [14] According to Tri-Met, the issue was compounded by maintenance diagrams that were "written mostly in Hungarian". [14] The lawsuit was later postponed, as the parties hoped to settle their differences out of court, [16] and 17 months after the suit was filed, Tri-Met announced that a settlement had been reached. [15] The warranties on Tri-Met's buses, which had originally been for one to two years but been extended, [13] were now extended through 1992, but most other details of the 1987 settlement were not released publicly. [15]

By 1986, Crown Coach had already ceased taking orders for the Crown-Ikarus 286, and production under the joint venture ended. [3] Ikarus re-entered the U.S. market on its own in 1989 as Ikarus USA, which after a series of reorganizations became North American Bus Industries (NABI) in 1996.

Operators

Crown-Ikarus buses were sold new to a total of only nine transit systems, all located in the United States. One additional operator obtained its Crown-Ikarus buses secondhand, though a lease.

OperatorLocationQuantityNotes
TARC Louisville, Kentucky 15Delivered in 1980, the first Crown-Ikarus 286 buses sold. [3] [5]
TriMet Portland, Oregon 87 [5] Delivered from 1981 to mid-1982; the largest purchase of the 286.
All had three doors; the rear door was fitted with a wheelchair lift.
Houston Metro Houston, Texas 50 [5] Delivered in 1985. [3] Five of 50 were fitted with 61 reclining seats (known as suburban-style seats, all forward-facing). [3]
MCTS Milwaukee, Wisconsin 40 [3] Ordered in November 1982; production was due to start in November 1983, but was delayed by problems at Crown Coach. [17] First unit was delivered mid-1984, but was returned to manufacturer for modifications; deliveries resumed in November 1984. [17] Series was retired in 2000.
SamTrans San Mateo County, California 10Delivered in 1981. [3]
Capital District Transportation Authority Albany, New York 8Delivered in 1984. [3]
Santa Clara County Transportation Agency San Jose, California 15 [5] Leased to AC Transit in 1988. [18]
TheBus Honolulu, Hawaii 8 [3] [5]
Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) Jacksonville, Florida 10 [3] [5]
AC Transit Oakland, California N/ALeased 15 buses from Santa Clara County from 1988. [18]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bus</span> Large road vehicle for transporting people

A bus is a road vehicle that carries significantly more passengers than an average car or van. It is most commonly used in public transport, but is also in use for charter purposes, or through private ownership. Although the average bus carries between 30 and 100 passengers, some buses have a capacity of up to 300 passengers. The most common type is the single-deck rigid bus, with double-decker and articulated buses carrying larger loads, and midibuses and minibuses carrying smaller loads. Coaches are used for longer-distance services. Many types of buses, such as city transit buses and inter-city coaches, charge a fare. Other types, such as elementary or secondary school buses or shuttle buses within a post-secondary education campus, are free. In many jurisdictions, bus drivers require a special large vehicle licence above and beyond a regular driving licence.

TriMet, formally known as the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, is a public agency that operates mass transit in a region that spans most of the Portland metropolitan area in the U.S. state of Oregon. Created in 1969 by the Oregon legislature, the district replaced five private bus companies that operated in the three counties: Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas. TriMet started operating a light rail system, MAX, in 1986, which has since been expanded to five lines that now cover 59.7 miles (96.1 km), as well as the WES Commuter Rail line in 2009. It also provides the operators and maintenance personnel for the city of Portland-owned Portland Streetcar system. In 2021, the system had a ridership of 44,508,200, or about 167,400 per weekday as of the second quarter of 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Articulated bus</span> Articulated vehicle used in public transportation

An articulated bus, also referred to as a banana bus, bendy bus, tandem bus, vestibule bus, wiggle wagon, stretch bus, or an accordion bus, is an articulated vehicle used in public transportation. It is usually a single-decker, and comprises two or more rigid sections linked by a pivoting joint (articulation) enclosed by protective bellows inside and outside and a cover plate on the floor. This allows a longer legal length than rigid-bodied buses, and hence a higher passenger capacity (94–120), while still allowing the bus to maneuver adequately.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Van Hool</span> Belgian bus, coach and trailer manufacturer

Van Hool NV is a Belgian family-owned coachbuilder and manufacturer of buses, coaches, trolleybuses, and trailers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ikarus (Hungarian company)</span> Bus manufacturer based in Hungary (1895-2003)

Ikarus was a bus manufacturer based in Budapest and Székesfehérvár, Hungary. It was established in 1895 as Imre Uhry's Blacksmith Workshop and Coach Factory(hun.: Uhry Imre Kovács- és Kocsigyártó Üzeme) and during the Communist era in Hungary it dominated bus markets of the entire Eastern Bloc and its allies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twin Coach</span> American vehicle manufacturing company

Twin Coach was an American vehicle manufacturing company from 1927 to 1955, located in Kent, Ohio, and a maker of marine engines and airplane parts until the 1960s. It was formed by brothers Frank and William Fageol when they left the Fageol Motor Company in 1927. They established the company in Kent to manufacture and sell buses with a new concept design. The body structure of this new bus was unique in that the body also became the frame and two engines – "twin" engines – were used to allow for larger passenger loads. This concept was patented by William B. Fageol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crown Coach Corporation</span> American bus manufacturer (1904-1991)

The Crown Coach Corporation is a defunct American bus manufacturer. Founded in 1904, the company was best known for its Supercoach range of yellow school buses and motorcoaches; the former vehicles were marketed throughout the West Coast of the United States. Competing alongside Gillig Corporation and similar its Gillig Transit Coach, the two companies supplied California with school buses nearly exclusively into the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gillig</span> American bus manufacturer

Gillig is an American designer and manufacturer of buses. The company headquarters, along with its manufacturing operations, is located in Livermore, California. By volume, Gillig is the second-largest transit bus manufacturer in North America. As of 2013, Gillig had an approximate 31 percent market share of the combined United States and Canadian heavy-duty transit bus manufacturing industry, based on the number of equivalent unit deliveries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GM New Look bus</span> American public transit bus

The GM New Look bus is a municipal transit bus that was introduced in 1959 by the Truck and Coach Division of General Motors to replace the company's previous coach, retroactively known as the GM "old-look" transit bus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gillig Phantom</span> Series of buses produced by Gillig Corporation, United States from 1980 to 2008

The Gillig Phantom is a series of buses that was produced by an American manufacturer Gillig Corporation in Hayward, California. The successor to the long-running Gillig Transit Coach model line, the Phantom marked the transition of Gillig from a producer of yellow school buses to that of transit buses. The first transit bus assembled entirely by Gillig, the Phantom was produced exclusively as a high-floor bus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bi-articulated bus</span> Bus formed of three sections

A bi-articulated bus or double-articulated bus and sometimes train-bus or tram-bus is a type of high-capacity articulated bus with an extra axle and a second articulation joint, as well as extended length. Bi-articulated buses tend to be employed in high-frequency core routes or bus rapid transit schemes rather than in conventional bus routes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rocar DAC</span> Motor vehicle

Rocar DAC was a series of buses and trolleybuses produced by the Autobuzul company of Bucharest, Romania, between 1979 and 2000. They were available in both standard 12-meter models and articulated, 17-meter models. The first examples to enter service were DAC 117UDs that were made towards the end of 1978 and entered service with the ITB in Bucharest in April 1979.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rose City Transit</span>

The Rose City Transit Company was a private company that operated most mass transit service in the city of Portland, Oregon, from 1956 to 1969. It operated only within the city proper. Transit services connecting downtown Portland with suburbs outside the city but within the Portland metropolitan area were run by other private companies, mainly a consortium of four companies known collectively as the "Blue Bus" lines.

Rocar was a van, light truck, bus and trolleybus manufacturer based in Bucharest, Romania. The firm also produced light offroad vehicles and later heavy road vehicles. During its existence, the company produced over 350,000 vehicles.

Mexicana de Autobuses, S.A., or MASA, was a major bus and coach manufacturer located in Mexico. Formed in 1959, it was owned by the Mexican government until being privatized in 1988. It was the country's second-largest bus manufacturer when it was acquired by Volvo, in 1998, and renamed Volvo Buses de México, S.A.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blue Bus lines</span>

The "Blue Bus" lines were a group of four affiliated privately owned public transportation companies that provided bus transit service in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area in the 1950s and 1960s. The name was unofficial but was in common use in the 1960s, and variations included "Blue Bus lines", "Blue Lines", "blue bus" lines and "blue buses". The Blue Bus companies provided service only between Portland and suburbs outside the city, or within such suburbs, as transit service within the city of Portland was the exclusive franchise of the Portland Traction Company or, after 1956, the Rose City Transit Company (RCT). The "blue buses" were prohibited from making stops inside the city except to pick up passengers destined for points outside RCT's service area. The "blue" name was a reference to the paint scheme worn by most buses of the consortium. By contrast, city transit operator Rose City's buses wore a primarily red paint scheme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trolleybuses in Seattle</span> Electric transit system serving Seattle, Washington

The Seattle trolleybus system forms part of the public transportation network in the city of Seattle, Washington, operated by King County Metro. Originally opened on April 28, 1940, the network consists of 15 routes, with 174 trolleybuses operating on 68 miles (109 km) of two-way parallel overhead lines. As of the second quarter of 2022, the system carries riders on an average of 34,800 trips per weekday, comprising about 18 percent of King County Metro’s total daily ridership. At present in Seattle, a very common alternative term for trolleybus is trolley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orion-Ikarus 286</span> Motor vehicle

The Orion-Ikarus 286, commonly known as the Orion III, was an articulated bus marketed to Canadian transit operators by Ontario Bus Industries (OBI). It was produced as a joint venture between Ikarus Body and Coach Works and OBI from 1985 to 1989, and deployed primarily in Ottawa and Toronto. The Orion III fleets were retired prematurely due to corrosion, and all examples were withdrawn from service by 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MAN SG 220</span> German articulated bus

The MAN SG 220 was a VöV-Standard articulated bus designed and manufactured by Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg (M.A.N.) in Germany between 1978 and 1983, available with two, three, or four doors in two different lengths. The bus was also exported to different countries, built locally in France, Slovenia, Turkey, and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NABI SFW</span> American standard (high)-floor transit buses

The NABI SFW was a line of standard (high)-floor transit buses available in 40' rigid and 60' articulated nominal lengths, manufactured by the Ikarus USA joint venture, then by American Ikarus and North American Bus Industries (NABI) between 1989 and 2013. In addition to the different lengths, the buses were sold with a variety of prime movers, including conventional diesel and CNG combustion engines and hybrid diesel-electric power.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Bushell, Chris; and Stonham, Peter (eds.) (1986). Jane's Urban Transport Systems 1986, pp. 484–486. London: Jane's Publishing Company. ISBN   0-7106-0826-8.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Anders, George (March 28, 1984). "Soviet Bloc Bus Builder Hits Bumpy Road in U.S.". The Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition). p. 1.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stauss, Ed (1988). The Bus World Encyclopedia of Buses. Stauss Publications. pp. 108–109. ISBN   978-0-9619830-0-0.
  4. "MBS Timeline: The 1980s". Motor Coach Today. Motor Bus Society. January–March 1998. p. 17.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Wilkins, Van (Spring 1986). "Success with a Twist" (feature article about the development and use of articulated buses in North America). Bus World magazine, pp. 7–13. ISSN 0162-9689.
  6. Federman, Stan (November 30, 1981). "Tri-Met readies bendable buses". The Oregonian (Portland, Oregon), p. B1.
  7. Wilkins, Van (Winter 1988–89). "MAX and His Buses: Portland integrates light rail into its bus system". Bus World magazine, pp. 8–12.
  8. Bushell, Chris; Stonham, Peter, eds. (1988). Jane's Urban Transport Systems 1988. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group. ISBN   0-7106-0854-3.
  9. Trolleybus Magazine No. 117 (March 1981), p. 47. National Trolleybus Association (UK). ISSN 0266-7452.
  10. Trolleybus Magazine No. 113 (July 1980), p. 95.
  11. Trolleybus Magazine No. 126 (September/November 1982), p. 127.
  12. Trolley Coach News No. 54 (Summer/Fall 1982), pp. 102–103. North American Trackless Trolley Association (defunct)
  13. 1 2 3 4 Federman, Stan (November 5, 1985). "Tri-Met sues over articulated bus defects". The Oregonian , p. B5.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Federman, Stan (November 5, 1985). "Diagrams frustrated Tri-Met mechanics". The Oregonian, p. B5.
  15. 1 2 3 Federman, Stan (April 3, 1987). "Pact may straighten out articulated-bus problems". The Oregonian, p. D2.
  16. Federman, Stan (February 13, 1986). "Settlement due on bus defects". The Oregonian, p. A17.
  17. 1 2 Schultz, Russell E. (May–June 1986). "Milwaukee Part V [of history of transit in that city]: Milwaukee County Transit System, 1975 to 1985". Motor Coach Age, pp. 3–36 (primarily p. 33). Motor Bus Society. ISSN   0739-117X.
  18. 1 2 Hardie, Patrick R. (July–August 1988). "AC Transit to Overhaul Route Structure". Motor Coach Age , p. 45.