David Gratzer

Last updated

David George Gratzer (born September 5, 1974) is a physician, columnist, author, Congressional expert witness; he was a senior fellow at both the Manhattan Institute and the Montreal Economic Institute. Though he has written essays on topics as diverse as obesity and political campaigns, he is best known for his first book, published by ECW Press, when he was just 24: Code Blue: Reviving Canada's Health Care System. That book won the Donner Prize established by the Donner Canadian Foundation and was a national bestseller in his native Canada.[ citation needed ] Gratzer is a critic of the Canadian health care system, and of U.S. President Barack Obama's health care reform proposals. Gratzer was health care policy advisor to Rudy Giuliani's 2008 presidential campaign.

Contents

Early life

Gratzer born September 5, 1974, in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Gratzer's father, George, is a professor of mathematics at the University of Manitoba who emigrated from Hungary to the United States in 1963 and to Canada in 1966. Gratzer's mother, Catherine, is a retired dentist. [1] Gratzer's older brother earned his medical degree and now practices in the United States as a psychiatrist. [1]

Gratzer earned a B.Sc. at the University of Manitoba in 1996, was president of the University of Manitoba Students' Union (UMSU) during his final undergraduate year 1995–1996, and was appointed by the Lieutenant Governor of Manitoba to the University of Manitoba Board of Governors for four successive years from 1994 to 1998. [1]

In his early years, Gratzer was not particularly interested in health policy issues. As he noted later: [2]

When I grew up in Canada, I was interested in getting into medical school. If you had stopped me on the street when I was 16 or 17 and asked me about the Medical College Admission Test, I could have given you a variety of very satisfying, unique statistics on admission rates and so on. I didn't give a lot of thought to health policy. When HillaryCare was debated in the United States, I remember vaguely thinking there was something good about the idea: After all, government should be involved in health care. I had never even been to Washington, D.C.

Medical school and Code Blue (1999)

Gratzer attended medical school at the University of Manitoba from 1996 to 2000 and earned an M.D. in 2000. [1] On November 15, 1996, during his first year of medical school, the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) published a letter to the editor [3] [4] from Gratzer criticizing a June 15, 1996 CMAJ report comparing reserve funds held by the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) to those held by medical malpractice insurers in the United States. [5]

While in medical school, Gratzer was a regular contributor of opinion columns to National Post , wrote a weekly opinion column for the London Free Press and the Halifax Sunday Herald , and wrote columns on health care that appeared in several major newspapers and magazines, including the Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen and Calgary Herald . A 1997 Gratzer column "Being a young conservative is nothing to apologize for" said "I am a conservative. This is somewhat unfortunate, as people don't seem to understand how anyone under 40 can be right-wing." [6] A 1999 Gratzer column "Raising the minimum wage hurts the poor it hopes to help" lamented that even "two of Canada's three right-leaning governments have chosen to hike their minimum wages" and that "minimum wage earners are not underpaid but underproductive" [7] Gratzer won $250 as fourth place runner-up in 1998–1999 and won $2,500 as first prize in the 1999–2000 Felix Morley Journalism Competition of the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University for his newspaper columns. [1]

During his second year of medical school, Gratzer began writing a book about problems with the Canadian health care system but could not get anyone interested. Rejection letters piled up after he completed the book and he had doubts about his ability to get taken seriously until his third year of medical school, when Robert Lecker, professor of English at McGill University and co-founder of ECW Press agreed to publish his book. [8] In August 1999, during his fourth year of medical school, ECW Press published the 24-year-old Gratzer's first book, Code Blue: Reviving Canada's Health Care System

Gratzer wrote about deficiencies in Canadian health care and argued that they were the direct result of the system's design, and thus not amendable to simple reforms.

The magicians believe that, with just the right combination of government regulations, medicare will magically work. The spendthrifts argue that more government spending would solve every problem—from the attitude of the grumpiest hospital orderly to the lengthiest waiting list for radiation therapy… On the surface, they seem to have little in common. Both magicians and spendthrifts, however, believe in a government-run health care system. And while they don’t agree on the best way to reform medicare, they basically agree that government action will provide the solution. [9] :14–15

Gratzer called for market-based reforms. He won praise from a former Member of Parliament, Stephen Harper, who wrote: "Gratzer proposes a workable solution for the biggest public policy problem of the coming generation—government-controlled health care monopoly… Canada needs Gratzer’s solution." [9] :back cover Harper later became the Prime Minister of Canada.

On May 4, 2000, Gratzer was awarded $25,000 by the Donner Canadian Foundation as winner of its second annual Donner Prize for best public policy book of 1999 for Code Blue. [10] [11]

Residency and Better Medicine (2002)

In June 2000, Gratzer graduated from medical school and in July 2000 began a five-year psychiatry residency program at the University of Toronto. During his psychiatry residency, Gratzer continued to write newspaper opinion columns. A 2001 Gratzer column "Make room for prescription drug ads on television" advocated allowing direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs on television in Canada [12] (the United States and New Zealand are the only countries that allow direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs). [13]

In April 2002, ECW Press published Better Medicine: Reforming Canadian Health Care a book of essays edited by Gratzer. The collection of essays had 17 contributors from 3 countries and 2 continents. Essayists included historian Michael Bliss and columnist Margaret Wente. Dr. Victor Dirnfeld, a physician and former president of the Canadian Medical Association, wrote the introduction. Gratzer co-wrote an essay on market reforms seen in various European countries, and also wrote the concluding essay on medical savings accounts.

In September 2002, Gratzer was one of 25 Canadians under age 30 featured in a Maclean's "Leaders of Tomorrow" cover story. [8] In 2002, while still a psychiatry resident, Gratzer joined the Manhattan Institute as a senior fellow. [14]

In 2004, Gratzer was first author of a peer-reviewed brief report "Lifetime rates of alcoholism in adults with anxiety, depression, or co-morbid depression/anxiety: a community survey of Ontario" published in the Journal of Affective Disorders. [15]

On June 28, 2005, Gratzer testified in support of H.R. 2355, the Health Care Choice Act of 2005, at a hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Independent practice and The Cure (2006)

On June 30, 2005, Gratzer completed his University of Toronto psychiatry residency and became registered for independent practice of medicine in Ontario. [16] In April 2006, Gratzer became licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. [17] In May 2006, Gratzer became board-certified in psychiatry. [18]

In October 2006, Encounter Books published Gratzer's book, The Cure: How Capitalism Can Save American Health Care, about problems with the United States health care system.

The problem and the predicament of American health care can be stated in a single, paradoxical sentence: Everyone agrees that it’s the best in the world, but nobody really likes it. On the one hand, we are so blessed with medical breakthroughs that we take them virtually for granted. Cardiac care has been revolutionized in only a few short years; death due to cardiac disease has fallen by nearly two-thirds in the past five decades. Polio is confined to the history books. Childhood leukemia, once a death sentence, is almost always curable… Yet while the quality of American medicine has never been better, angst over American health care has never been greater. The state of Medicare, the cost of prescription drugs, and the numbers of uninsured are all considered crises. [19] :4

The book advocated moving health-care decisions closer to individuals and their families. Gratzer cited health savings accounts as a success story and bemoaned the state of health care in countries with government-run systems. He advocated various reforms: Gratzer proposed turning over all current federal funding for Medicaid to state governments in the form of block grants to experiment with, using welfare reform as a model; tightening Medicaid eligibility for long-term care; expanding health savings accounts; and encouraging the purchase of private long term care insurance.

In the last chapter, he proposed more far-reaching reforms while acknowledging that neither political party would currently advocate them:

  1. "Making Health Insurance Portable": ending the tax exemption of employer-provided health insurance and scrapping government regulations mandating what conditions and whom and at what rates private health insurance companies must provide coverage, thereby making it easier for families to purchase health insurance through their employer, their union, or their church;
  2. "Shoring up Medicare": pre-funding the program (either through individual accounts or a trust fund), and raising the Medicare eligibility age to 70;
  3. "Creating a Market for Medical Progress": ending the FDA's requirement that drugs demonstrate "efficacy", and return to only requiring pre-marketing demonstration of safety.

The Foreword was written by Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman. He wrote: "David Gratzer is a practicing psychiatrist who combines firsthand knowledge of medical practice in both his native Canada and the U.S. with an independent point of view and a rare capacity for lucid exposition of complex technical material... If you want a well-written, interesting yet authoritative and thorough account of what is wrong with medicine today and how to cure American health care, this is the book for you." [19] :foreword

The Cure was named a "Top Ten Reading Selection for 2007" by the National Chamber Foundation. [20]

2008 campaign and beyond

On July 30, 2007, Rudy Giuliani's 2008 presidential campaign named Gratzer as one of his five key health care policy advisors, along with Hoover Institution senior fellow Dan Kessler, Hoover Institution senior fellow Scott Atlas, Pacific Research Institute president and CEO Sally Pipes, and The Moran Company founder and president Donald Moran. [21] During the campaign, Giuliani championed interstate health-insurance markets and tax parity for non-employer purchases of health insurance, both positions favored by Gratzer.

Giuliani said that his chance of surviving prostate cancer was 82% in the US, but only 44% under socialized medicine in England. Giuliani got his facts from the Manhattan Institute, in an article by Gratzer. [22] Many cancer experts said that Gratzer was wrong, because he incorrectly compared survival statistics. [23] [24] [25] Gratzer responded [26] by citing economist John Goodman, co-founder and president of the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA), by economist June O'Neill, and by U.S. Constitutional historian and health policy expert Betsy McCaughey, a former John M. Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Gratzer also cited [26] a September 2007 Lancet Oncology article which he said found superior cancer outcomes in the United States for 16 cancers when compared to European countries. [27]

After Giuliani withdrew, Gratzer endorsed the McCain health-care proposal.

Gratzer testified several times during the recent health-care reform debates, including before the House Budget and Ways and Means Committees. In a June 2009 U.S. Congressional hearing on the issue of single-payer health care, Gratzer and U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) clashed over Canadian healthcare statistics.

According to a June 29, 2009, front-page article in Canada's National Post , "armed with a stack of statistics about patient wait lists in Canada, and a fusillade of dire warnings about the life-threatening consequences of government-managed care," Gratzer "has emerged as the go-to expert witness for GOP lawmakers hoping to sow doubt in Congress about the wisdom of embracing Mr. Obama's call for a public health insurance option to compete with private insurers." [28]

In July 2009, he appeared on 20/20 to discuss health care. [29]

In November 2009, Encounter Books published a short book of his criticism of the White House plans, How Obama’s Government Takeover of Health Care Will Be a Disaster.

Gratzer continues to comment and debate on health-care issues. He is founding contributor to both FrumForum (formerly NewMajority) and the Canadian version of the Huffington Post. With former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, he debated at the Munk Debates.

More recent work has focused on obesity. In a widely reprinted Los Angeles Times piece, he argued that society was suffering from a McVictim Syndrome with "[t]oo many pundits, public health experts and politicians are working overtime to find scapegoats for America's obesity epidemic." He rejects this: "governments can't micromanage your waistline for you. Even if governments could magically walk you to work, ban food advertising, regulate sugar out of food and suck those fat particles out of the air, in a free society you would still have the power to drive to the nearest restaurant, shake your salt shaker and order a second piece of pie. That's why understanding—and rejecting—the McVictim culture is crucial to obesity reduction policy."

Works

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (United States)</span> US government health insurance program

Medicare is a federal health insurance program in the United States for people age 65 or older and younger people with disabilities, including those with end stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. It was begun in 1965 under the Social Security Administration and is now administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (Canada)</span> Canadas publicly funded, single-payer health care system

Medicare is an unofficial designation used to refer to the publicly funded single-payer healthcare system of Canada. Canada's health care system consists of 13 provincial and territorial health insurance plans, which provide universal healthcare coverage to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and depending on the province or territory, certain temporary residents. The systems are individually administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government. The formal terminology for the insurance system is provided by the Canada Health Act and the health insurance legislation of the individual provinces and territories.

Socialized medicine is a term used in the United States to describe and discuss systems of universal health care—medical and hospital care for all by means of government regulation of health care and subsidies derived from taxation. Because of historically negative associations with socialism in American culture, the term is usually used pejoratively in American political discourse. The term was first widely used in the United States by advocates of the American Medical Association in opposition to President Harry S. Truman's 1947 health care initiative. It was later used in opposition to Medicare. The Affordable Care Act has been described in terms of socialized medicine, but the act's objective is rather socialized insurance, not government ownership of hospitals and other facilities as is common in other nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Publicly funded health care</span> Form of health care financing

Publicly funded healthcare is a form of health care financing designed to meet the cost of all or most healthcare needs from a publicly managed fund. Usually this is under some form of democratic accountability, the right of access to which are set down in rules applying to the whole population contributing to the fund or receiving benefits from it.

Prescription drug list prices in the United States continually are among the highest in the world. The high cost of prescription drugs became a major topic of discussion in the 21st century, leading up to the American health care reform debate of 2009, and received renewed attention in 2015. One major reason for high prescription drug prices in the United States relative to other countries is the inability of government-granted monopolies in the American health care sector to use their bargaining power to negotiate lower prices, and the American payer ends up subsidizing the world's R&D spending on drugs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act</span>

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act, also called the Medicare Modernization Act or MMA, is a federal law of the United States, enacted in 2003. It produced the largest overhaul of Medicare in the public health program's 38-year history.

Health insurance or medical insurance is a type of insurance that covers the whole or a part of the risk of a person incurring medical expenses. As with other types of insurance, risk is shared among many individuals. By estimating the overall risk of health risk and health system expenses over the risk pool, an insurer can develop a routine finance structure, such as a monthly premium or payroll tax, to provide the money to pay for the health care benefits specified in the insurance agreement. The benefit is administered by a central organization, such as a government agency, private business, or not-for-profit entity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States</span> Healthcare system comparison

A comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States is often made by government, public health and public policy analysts. The two countries had similar healthcare systems before Canada changed its system in the 1960s and 1970s. The United States spends much more money on healthcare than Canada, on both a per-capita basis and as a percentage of GDP. In 2006, per-capita spending for health care in Canada was US$3,678; in the U.S., US$6,714. The U.S. spent 15.3% of GDP on healthcare in that year; Canada spent 10.0%. In 2006, 70% of healthcare spending in Canada was financed by government, versus 46% in the United States. Total government spending per capita in the U.S. on healthcare was 23% higher than Canadian government spending. U.S. government expenditure on healthcare was just under 83% of total Canadian spending.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Canada</span>

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through the provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984, and is universal. The 2002 Royal Commission, known as the Romanow Report, revealed that Canadians consider universal access to publicly funded health services as a "fundamental value that ensures national health care insurance for everyone wherever they live in the country."

<i>Sicko</i> 2007 film by Michael Moore

Sicko is a 2007 American political documentary film by filmmaker Michael Moore. Investigating health care in the United States, the film focuses on the country's health insurance and the pharmaceutical industry. Moore compares the for-profit non-universal U.S. system with the non-profit universal health care systems of Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Cuba.

<i>Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Chaoulli v Quebec (AG) [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35, was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada of which the Court ruled that the Quebec Health Insurance Act and the Hospital Insurance Act prohibiting private medical insurance in the face of long wait times, up to 9 months, violated the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. In a 4 to 3 decision, the Court found the Acts violated Quebecers' right to life and security of person under the Quebec Charter. The ruling is binding only in Quebec. Three of the seven judges also found that the laws violated section seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. One judge did not rule on the Canadian Charter. The result was a 3–3 tie on the question of the Canadian Charter, so Chaoulli decision does not apply to any other province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare Part D</span> United States prescription drug benefit for the elderly and disabled

Medicare Part D, also called the Medicare prescription drug benefit, is an optional United States federal-government program to help Medicare beneficiaries pay for self-administered prescription drugs. Part D was enacted as part of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and went into effect on January 1, 2006. Under the program, drug benefits are provided by private insurance plans that receive premiums from both enrollees and the government. Part D plans typically pay most of the cost for prescriptions filled by their enrollees. However, plans are later reimbursed for much of this cost through rebates paid by manufacturers and pharmacies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of medicine in Canada</span>

Hospitals in Canada were initially places which cared for the poor as those with higher socioeconomic status were cared for at home. In Quebec during the 18th century, a series of charitable institutions, many set up by Catholic religious orders, provided such care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Australia</span> Availability, funding, and provision of health services in Australia

Health care in Australia operates under a shared public-private model underpinned by the Medicare system, the national single-payer funding model. State and territory governments operate public health facilities where eligible patients receive care free of charge. Primary health services, such as GP clinics, are privately owned in most situations, but attract Medicare rebates. Australian citizens, permanent residents, and some visitors and visa holders are eligible for health services under the Medicare system. Individuals are encouraged through tax surcharges to purchase health insurance to cover services offered in the private sector, and further fund health care.

Healthcare reform in the United States has a long history. Reforms have often been proposed but have rarely been accomplished. In 2010, landmark reform was passed through two federal statutes: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed March 23, 2010, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amended the PPACA and became law on March 30, 2010.

In the United States, a medical savings account (MSA) refers to a medical savings account program, generally associated with self-employed individuals, in which tax-deferred deposits can be made for medical expenses. Withdrawals from the MSA are tax-free if used to pay for qualified medical expenses. The MSA must be coupled with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP). Withdrawals from MSA go toward paying the deductible expenses in a given year. MSA account funds can cover expenses related to most forms of health care, disability, dental care, vision care, and long-term care, whether the expenses were billed through the qualifying insurance or otherwise.

The healthcare reform debate in the United States has been a political issue focusing upon increasing medical coverage, decreasing costs, insurance reform, and the philosophy of its provision, funding, and government involvement.

Healthcare rationing in the United States exists in various forms. Access to private health insurance is rationed on price and ability to pay. Those unable to afford a health insurance policy are unable to acquire a private plan except by employer-provided and other job-attached coverage, and insurance companies sometimes pre-screen applicants for pre-existing medical conditions. Applicants with such conditions may be declined cover or pay higher premiums and/or have extra conditions imposed such as a waiting period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in the United States</span>

Healthcare in the United States is largely provided by private sector healthcare facilities, and paid for by a combination of public programs, private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. The U.S. is the only developed country without a system of universal healthcare, and a significant proportion of its population lacks health insurance. The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP; however, this expenditure does not necessarily translate into better overall health outcomes compared to other developed nations. Coverage varies widely across the population, with certain groups, such as the elderly and low-income individuals, receiving more comprehensive care through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Snowbird Association</span>

The Canadian Snowbird Association is a national, not-for-profit organization dedicated to defending and improving the rights and privileges of travelling Canadians.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Lumley, Elizabeth, ed. (2007). Canadian who's who (2007 ed., v. 42 ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 514. OCLC   2604443.
  2. Gratzer D. The Cure. Speech to the Heritage Foundation. 2006 October 18.
  3. Gratzer, David (November 15, 1996). "Drawing comparisons and conclusions between Canadian and US malpractice insurance". CMAJ . 155 (10): 1389–90. PMC   1335102 . PMID   8943923.
  4. Korcok, Milan (November 15, 1996). "Author response to: Drawing comparisons and conclusions between Canadian and US malpractice insurance". CMAJ . 155 (10): 1390. PMC   1335102 . PMID   8943923.
  5. Korcok, Milan (June 15, 1996). "CMPA not alone in pursuing huge reserves, CMAJ survey of US firms reveals". CMAJ . 154 (12): 1891–94. PMC   1487749 . PMID   8653650.
  6. Gratzer, David (July 20, 1997). "Being a young conservative is nothing to apologize for". The Gazette . p. A9.
  7. Gratzer, David (January 2, 1999). "Raising the minimum wage hurts the poor it hopes to help: Cheap compassion comes with a significant cost". National Post . p. D08.
  8. 1 2 Aubin, Benoit; et al. (September 9, 2002). "Leaders of tomorrow: 25 Canadians under age 30". Maclean's . pp. 20–30.
  9. 1 2 Gratzer, David (August 1999). Code Blue: Reviving Canada's Health Care System. Toronto: ECW Press.
  10. Tertius (May 3, 2000). "Jumping the Donner Foundation's gun". The Globe and Mail . p. R2.
  11. Square, David (June 27, 2000). "Fourth-year medical student takes Donner Prize" (PDF). CMAJ . 162 (13): 1863.
  12. Gratzer, David (May 4, 2001). "Make room for prescription drug ads on television". The Ottawa Citizen . p. A15.
  13. Mintzes, Barbara (January 2006). Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs in Canada: What are the Public Health Implications? (PDF). Toronto: Health Council of Canada. ISBN   0-9739725-6-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-11. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
  14. Gratzer, David (November 1, 2002). "Universal Health Care Revived? The electoral stakes in Oregon". National Review Online.
  15. Gratzer, David; Levitan, Robert D.; Sheldon, Tess; Toneatto, Tony; Rector, Neil A.; Goering, Paula (April 2004). "Lifetime rates of alcoholism in adults with anxiety, depression, or co-morbid depression/anxiety: a community survey of Ontario". J Affect Disord. 79 (1–3): 209–15. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00355-5. PMID   15023496.
  16. Anonymous (June 30, 2005). "David George Gratzer - registration 75146". College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
  17. Anonymous (April 26, 2006). "David George Gratzer - license MD428922". Pennsylvania Department of State. Archived from the original on May 11, 2012. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
  18. Anonymous (May 14, 2006). "ABPN Congratulations - David George Gratzer" (PDF). American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 11, 2008. Retrieved July 24, 2008.
  19. 1 2 Gratzer, David (October 2006). The Cure: How Capitalism Can Save American Health Care. New York: Encounter Books. ISBN   1-59403-153-3.
  20. "National Chamber Foundation". Archived from the original on 2011-05-23. Retrieved 2010-05-31.
  21. Rudy Giuliani Presidential Committee, Inc. (July 30, 2007). "Rudy Giuliani campaign announces health care advisors". JoinRudy2008.com.
    Tapper, Jake (July 30, 2007). "Giuliani gets healthy". ABCNews.com.
  22. Where Would You Rather Be Sick? David Gratzer. City Journal. June 15, 2006
  23. Giuliani’s Prostate Cancer Figure Is Disputed, By JULIE BOSMAN, New York Times, OCT. 31, 2007
  24. THE CLAIM: GIULIANI'S PROGNOSIS WOULD BE WORSE IN BRITAIN. Washington Post, October 31, 2007
  25. A Bogus Cancer Statistic. Giuliani falsely claims that only 44 percent of prostate cancer patients survive under "socialized medicine" in England. By Lori Robertson. October 30, 2007
  26. 1 2 Gratzer, David (October 31, 2007). "Malignant rumor". City Journal Online . Manhattan Institute.
  27. Verdecchia, Arduino and the EUROCARE-4 Working Group; et al. (September 2007). "Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data". Lancet Oncology . 8 (9): 784–96. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70246-2. PMID   17714993.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  28. Alberts, Sheldon (June 29, 2009). "Obama's foe a Canadian; Manitoba-born doctor is the Republican go-to expert on medicare". National Post . p. A1.
  29. "Video". ABC News .