Delusions of Gender

Last updated
Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference
Delusions of gender cover.jpg
Cover of the first edition
Author Cordelia Fine
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Sex and intelligence
Publisher W. W. Norton & Company
Publication date
2010
Media typePrint (hardcover and paperback)
Pages338
ISBN 0-393-06838-2

Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference is a 2010 book by Cordelia Fine, written to debunk the idea that men and women are hardwired with different interests. The author criticizes claimed evidence of the existence of innate biological differences between men and women's minds as being faulty and exaggerated, and while taking a position of agnosticism with respect to inherent differences relating to interest/skill in "understanding the world" versus "understanding people", reviews literature demonstrating how cultural and societal beliefs contribute to sex differences.

Contents

Contents

In the first part of the book, "'Half Changed World', Half Changed Minds", Fine argues that social and environmental factors strongly influence the mind, challenging a 'biology as fallback' view that, since society is equal now for the sexes, persistent inequalities must be due to biology. She also discusses the history and impact of gender stereotypes and the ways that science has been used to justify sexism.

In the second part of the book, "Neurosexism", Fine criticizes the current available arguments and studies supporting sex differences in the mind, focusing on methodological weaknesses and implicit assumptions. Within neuroscientific investigations, these include small samples that give rise to unreliable, spurious results, and poorly justified 'reverse inferences' (claims of stereotype-consistent psychological differences between the sexes on the basis of brain differences). Fine also demonstrates how already weak neuroscientific conclusions are then grossly overblown by popular writers. Fine also discusses non-neuroimaging evidence cited as support for innate differences between the sexes. For example, she explains weaknesses in the work done by a student of Simon Baron-Cohen that has been widely cited (by the Gurian Institute, by Leonard Sax, by Peter Lawrence, and by Baron-Cohen himself): one-and-a-half-day-old babies were tested for preference in sequence rather than being given a choice; were tested in different viewing positions, some horizontal on their backs and some held in a parent's lap, which could affect their perception; inadequate efforts were made to ensure the sex of the subject was unknown to the tester at the time of the test; the authors assume, without justification, that newborn looking preferences are a reliable 'flag' for later social skills that are the product of a long and complex developmental process. [1]

In the third part of the book, "Recycling Gender", Fine discusses the highly gendered society in which children develop, and the contribution of that to the group identity processes that motivate children to 'self-socialize'. This challenges the common belief of parents that they tried gender-neutral parenting, but it didn't work. An overall thesis of the work is the negative impact for sex equality of neurosexism (popular or academic neuroscientific claims that reinforce or justify gender stereotypes in ways that are not scientifically justified).

Reception

In the UK, the book received positive reviews in Nature , [2] The Independent , The Times Literary Supplement , New Scientist , Metro and The Belfast Telegraph . [3] The Guardian [4] and the Evening Standard [5] each chose it as a Book of the Year. It was Book of the Week in Times Higher Education . [6]

In Australia, the book received positive reviews in The Age , The Australian and The West Australian . [3]

Delusions of Gender received positive reviews in the United States in The New York Times , [7] The Washington Post , [8] USA Today , [9] Newsweek , [10] Jezebel [11] and Kirkus Reviews . [12] Publishers Weekly chose it for a starred review and as a Pick of the Week. [3]

More positive reviews came from Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , The Globe and Mail , Socialist Worker , Out in Perth, The Fat Quarter, Erotic Review, The F Word, Counterfire, Neuroskeptic (at Discover magazine). [3] Ms. magazine and Elle singled the book out for their readers. [3]

Academic reception

Developmental psychopathologist Simon Baron-Cohen, whose research is criticized in Delusions of Gender, [13] reviewed the book in The Psychologist , saying Fine was "fusing science with politics", and that "Where I – and I suspect many other contemporary scientists – would part ways with Fine is in her strident, extreme denial of the role that biology might play in giving rise to any sex differences in the mind and brain. ...(she) ignores that you can be a scientist interested in the nature of sex differences while being a clear supporter of equal opportunities and a firm opponent of all forms of discrimination in society." [14] Fine responded in a published letter, stating "The thesis of my book [...] is that while social effects on sex differences are well-established, spurious results, poor methodologies and untested assumptions mean we don't yet know whether, on average, males and females are born differently predisposed to systemizing versus empathising." [15]

Former APA President Diane F. Halpern [lower-alpha 1] reviewed the book in the journal Science , concluding that it was "strongest in exposing research conclusions that are closer to fiction than science...[but] weakest in failing to also point out differences that are supported by a body of carefully conducted and well-replicated research", stating that Fine largely ignores the latter body of research. [17]

Stanford neurobiologist Ben Barres stated in a review for PLOS Biology that Delusions of Gender "should be required reading for every neurobiology student, if not every human being". [18]

McCarthy and Ball (2011) reviewed the book in the journal Biology of Sex Differences , stating "Prompting laypeople to adopt a more critical view of overly simplistic views of complex data sets is a goal any scientist can support, and for that we applaud (Fine's) efforts." They suggested that Fine's book presents an oversimplified and seriously distorted characterization of neuroscience as applied to the study of sex differences. They expressed disappointment that Fine's book "...can be vexing in the ways the scientific study of sex differences in brain and behavior is portrayed and (how) the current state-of-the-art is presented". [19]

Evolutionary biologist Marlene Zuk, reviewing the book with Rebecca Jordan-Young's Brain Storm, in the Quarterly Review of Biology wrote: "It is important to emphasize that neither author advocates throwing the gender-neutral baby out with its pink or blue bathwater ... The books are good ammunition for arguments with people who think science has incontrovertibly shown biological bases for gender differences such as mathematical ability. At the same time, they are not simply claiming that “it is all culture” or that science can play no role in understanding gender. Both Fine and Jordan-Young want better science, not less of it." [20]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Halpern co-authored an article, "The Science of Sex Differences in Mathematics and Science", [16] that Fine criticizes in Delusions of Gender.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prejudice</span> Attitudes based on preconceived categories

Prejudice can be an affective feeling towards a person based on their perceived group membership. The word is often used to refer to a preconceived evaluation or classification of another person based on that person's perceived personal characteristics, such as political affiliation, sex, gender, gender identity, beliefs, values, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race, ethnicity, language, nationality, culture, complexion, beauty, height, body weight, occupation, wealth, education, criminality, sport-team affiliation, music tastes or other perceived characteristics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simon Baron-Cohen</span> British psychologist and author

Sir Simon Philip Baron-Cohen is a British clinical psychologist and professor of developmental psychopathology at the University of Cambridge. He is the director of the university's Autism Research Centre and a Fellow of Trinity College.

Sex differences in psychology are differences in the mental functions and behaviors of the sexes and are due to a complex interplay of biological, developmental, and cultural factors. Differences have been found in a variety of fields such as mental health, cognitive abilities, personality, emotion, sexuality, and tendency towards aggression. Such variation may be innate, learned, or both. Modern research attempts to distinguish between these causes and to analyze any ethical concerns raised. Since behavior is a result of interactions between nature and nurture, researchers are interested in investigating how biology and environment interact to produce such differences, although this is often not possible.

Diane F. Halpern is an American psychologist and former president of the American Psychological Association (APA). She is Dean of Social Science at the Minerva Schools at KGI and also the McElwee Family Professor of Psychology at Claremont McKenna College. She is also past-president of the Western Psychological Association, The Society for the Teaching of Psychology, and the Division of General Psychology.

The empathising–systemising (E–S) theory is a theory on the psychological basis of autism and male–female neurological differences originally put forward by English clinical psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen. It classifies individuals based on abilities in empathic thinking (E) and systematic thinking (S). It measures skills using an Empathy Quotient (EQ) and Systemising Quotient (SQ) and attempts to explain the social and communication symptoms in autism spectrum disorders as deficits and delays in empathy combined with intact or superior systemising.

<i>The Female Brain</i> (book)

The Female Brain is a book written by the American neuropsychiatrist Louann Brizendine in 2006. The main thesis of the book is that women's behavior is different from that of men due, in large measure, to hormonal differences. Brizendine says that the human female brain is affected by the following hormones: estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, oxytocin, neurotransmitters, and that there are differences in the architecture of the brain that regulate such hormones and neurotransmitters.

Susan Tufts Fiske is an American psychologist who serves as the Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs in the Department of Psychology at Princeton University. She is a social psychologist known for her work on social cognition, stereotypes, and prejudice. Fiske leads the Intergroup Relations, Social Cognition, and Social Neuroscience Lab at Princeton University. Her theoretical contributions include the development of the stereotype content model, ambivalent sexism theory, power as control theory, and the continuum model of impression formation.

Leonard Sax is an American psychologist and a practicing family physician. He is best known as the author of three books for parents: Boys Adrift, Girls on the Edge, and Why Gender Matters. According to his web site, he is currently employed as a physician at a healthcare facility in Chester County Pennsylvania, where he also resides.

Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities (ISBN 9780805827927) is a book by Diane Halpern published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates in 2000, and now in its fourth edition. Halpern served as president of the American Psychological Association in 2004.

At the time [I started writing this book], it seemed clear to me that any between-sex differences in thinking abilities were due to socialization practices, artifacts, and mistakes in the research. After reviewing a pile of journal articles that stood several feet high and numerous books and book chapters that dwarfed the stack of journal articles, I changed my mind.

The sexual division of labour (SDL) is the delegation of different tasks between the male and female members of a species. Among human foragers, males and females targeted different types of foods and shared them with each other for a mutual or familial benefit. In some species, males and females eat slightly different foods, while in other species, males and females will routinely share food; but only in humans are these two attributes combined. The few remaining hunter-gatherer populations in the world serve as evolutionary models that can help explain the origin of the sexual division of labour. Many studies on the sexual division of labour have been conducted on hunter-gatherer populations, such as the Hadza, a hunter-gatherer population of Tanzania. In modern day society sex differences in occupation is seen across cultures, with the tendency that men do technical work and women tend to do work related to care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cordelia Fine</span> Canadian-born British psychologist and writer

Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher of science, psychologist, and writer. She is a full professor in the History and Philosophy of Science programme at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Fine has written three popular science books on the topics of social cognition, neuroscience, and the popular myths of sex differences. Her latest book, Testosterone Rex, won the Royal Society Science Book Prize, 2017. She has authored several academic book chapters and numerous academic publications. Fine is also noted for coining the term 'neurosexism'.

Rebecca M. Jordan-Young, is an American feminist scientist and gender studies scholar. Her research focuses on social medical science, sex, gender, sexuality, and epidemiology. She is an Associate Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Barnard College.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neuroscience of sex differences</span> Characteristics of the brain that differentiate the male brain and the female brain

The neuroscience of sex differences is the study of characteristics that separate the male and female brains. Psychological sex differences are thought by some to reflect the interaction of genes, hormones, and social learning on brain development throughout the lifespan.

Sex differences in humans have been studied in a variety of fields. Sex determination occurs by the presence or absence of a Y in the 23rd pair of chromosomes in the human genome. Phenotypic sex refers to an individual's sex as determined by their internal and external genitalia and expression of secondary sex characteristics.

Sex differences in human intelligence have long been a topic of debate among researchers and scholars. It is now recognized that there are no significant sex differences in general intelligence, though particular subtypes of intelligence vary somewhat between sexes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gina Rippon</span> Professor of cognitive neuroimaging

Gina Rippon is a British neurobiologist and feminist. She is a professor emeritus of cognitive neuroimaging at the Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, Birmingham. Rippon has also sat on the editorial board of the International Journal of Psychophysiology. In 2019, Rippon published her book, Gendered Brain: The New Neuroscience that Shatters the Myth of the Female Brain, which investigates the role of life experiences and biology in brain development.

Anelis Kaiser is professor of gender studies at MINT, University of Freiburg, Germany. She is also on the lecturer within the social psychology and social neuroscience department at the University of Bern, Switzerland. Along with Isabelle Dussauge, Kaiser was a guest editor of a special issue on Neuroscience and sex/gender of the journal Neuroethics, they also co-founded The NeuroGenderings Network together.

The NeuroGenderings Network is an international group of researchers in neuroscience and gender studies. Members of the network study how the complexities of social norms, varied life experiences, details of laboratory conditions and biology interact to affect the results of neuroscientific research. Working under the label of "neurofeminism", they aim to critically analyze how the field of neuroscience operates, and to build an understanding of brain and gender that goes beyond gender essentialism while still treating the brain as fundamentally material. Its founding was part of a period of increased interest and activity in interdisciplinary research connecting neuroscience and the social sciences.

Daphna Joel is an Israeli neuroscientist and advocate for "neurofeminism". She is best known for her research which claims that there is no such thing as a "male brain" or a "female brain". Joel's research has been criticized by other neuroscientists who argue that male and female brains, on average, show distinct differences and can be classified with a high level of accuracy. Joel is a member of The NeuroGenderings Network, an international group of researchers in gender studies and neuroscience. They are critical of what they call neurosexism in the scientific community. Joel has given lectures on her work in both scientific and lay conventions around the world.

Neurosexism is an alleged bias in the neuroscience of sex differences towards reinforcing harmful gender stereotypes. The term was coined by feminist scholar Cordelia Fine in a 2008 article and popularised by her 2010 book Delusions of Gender. The concept is now widely used by critics of the neuroscience of sex differences in neuroscience, neuroethics and philosophy.

References

  1. ↑ Fine, Cordelia (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference . W. W. Norton. pp. 112–115. ISBN   978-0-393-34024-2.
  2. ↑ Valian, Virginia (16 February 2011). "Psychology: More alike than different". Nature. 470 (7334): 332–333. Bibcode:2011Natur.470..332V. doi: 10.1038/470332a . Preview and rental of print article via Readcube.com.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Delusions of Gender". Cordeliafine.com. Archived from the original on September 5, 2013. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
  4. ↑ Winterson, Jeanette (November 26, 2010). "Books of the year". The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
  5. ↑ Urwin, Rosamund (November 25, 2010). "The books we loved in 2010". Evening Standard. London. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
  6. ↑ Rose, Hilary (September 30, 2010). "Book of the Week: Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences" . THE: Times Higher Education. TSL Education. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
  7. ↑ Bouton, Elizabeth (August 23, 2010). "Peeling Away Theories on Gender and the Brain" . The New York Times. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
  8. ↑ Herbert, Wray (September 12, 2010). "'Delusions of Gender' argues that faulty science is furthering sexism" . The Washington Post. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
  9. ↑ Vergano, Dan (August 8, 2010). "Neuroscience or 'Neurosexism'? Book claims brain scans sell sexes short". USA Today. Gannett. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
  10. ↑ Bennett, Jessica (September 1, 2010). "'Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference'". Newsweek. Newsweek/Daily Beast. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
  11. ↑ North, Anna (September 1, 2010). "5 Myths About The Female Brain". Jezebel.com. Gawker Media. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
  12. ↑ "Book Review: Delusions of Gender". Kirkus Reviews. Nielsen Business Media. June 15, 2010. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
  13. ↑ Sutton, Jon (November 2010). "Editorial". The Psychologist. 23 (11). ISSN   0952-8229.
  14. ↑ Baron-Cohen, Simon (November 2010). "Delusions of gender –'neurosexism', biology and politics" (PDF). The Psychologist. 23 (11): 904–905. ISSN   0952-8229.
  15. ↑ Fine, Cordelia (December 2010). "Seductive arguments?". Forum. The Psychologist. 23 (12): 948–949. ISSN   0952-8229. Archived from the original on 8 December 2018.
  16. ↑ Halpern, Diane F.; Benbow, Camilla P.; Geary, David C.; Gur, Ruben C.; Hyde, Janet Shibley; Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (August 2007). "The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics". Psychological Science in the Public Interest . 8 (1): 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x. JSTOR   40062381. PMC   4270278 . PMID   25530726.
  17. ↑ Halpern, Diane F. (2010). "How Neuromythologies Support Sex Role Stereotypes". Science. 330 (6009): 1320–1321. Bibcode:2010Sci...330.1320H. doi:10.1126/science.1198057. ISSN   0036-8075. JSTOR   40963960. S2CID   178308134. Despite the large amount of junk science on the topic that is reported in the popular media and in some academic outlets, there are also consistent findings of sex differences that hold up across studies, across species, and across cultures. Most of these are ignored by Fine.
  18. ↑ Barres, Ben A. (2010). "Neuro Nonsense". PLOS Biology. 8 (12): e1001005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001005 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   3001899 .
  19. ↑ McCarthy, Margaret M; Ball, Gregory F (2011). "Tempests and tales: challenges to the study of sex differences in the brain". Biology of Sex Differences. 2 (1): 4. doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-2-4 . ISSN   2042-6410. PMC   3108906 .
  20. ↑ Zuk, Marlene (15 August 2017). Fine, Cordelia; Jordan-Young, Rebecca M. (eds.). "Mentally Rotating Gender". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 86 (3): 198–202. doi:10.1086/661120. JSTOR   10.1086/661120. S2CID   82005442.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.