Democracy in classical Iran

Last updated

Early Iranians had their own regional elected councils. By the time of the Medians, the city-states were administered in a democratic fashion.

Contents

During the Achaemenids, in a debate over the constitution of Iran, Otanes argued in favor of democracy, however he did not succeed. He enumerated five characteristic marks of the democracy: 1, an equality of rights for all; 2, the rejection of arbitrary power as ordinarily exercised by eastern princes; 3, appointment to offices by lot; 4, responsibility in office; 5, deliberation in common, and the framing of laws in popular assemblies.

By the time of Parthians, the appointment of kings was through election in the Parthian parliament, Megisthanes. In this way the king could be the representative of the whole nation.

Early Iranians

Regional elected councils are well documented particularly in the Indo-Iranian societies. [1]

Zoroaster's Gathas states that in order to bring peace, prosperity, stability, progress and happiness to the living world, people are to select only competent persons. [1] Song 16 is particularly dedicated to "Vohû Khshathra Vairya," literally "Good Domain Worthy-of-Choice." It shows that an ideal government must be an elected one. [1]

In its most sacred prayer the Ahunavar (Choice of the Lord), Zoroastrians are taught that their Lord and leader are to be chosen, through a Good Mind and only on account of their individual righteousness. This sets the basis for a spiritual and political democracy as far back as nearly four millennia ago. [2]

Zoroaster, the Iranian prophet advised people to listen to all parties and to choose the best of them. He said (Yasna 30, paragraph 2) "O people, listen to others and accept the best of them, and consider them with a bright and deep thinking. Every man and woman should chose the path of good and bad by his/her own." [3] [4] [5] He did not discriminate between man and woman in this regard and counted them equally. [5] In Yasna 30, he said "hearken with your ears to these best counsels, Reflect upon them with illumined judgment. Let each one choose his creed with that freedom of choice each must have at great events. O ye, be awake to these, my announcements." [6]

Medes

Diodorus mentions that after the Assyrians had ruled Asia for five hundred years "they were conquered by the Medes, and thereafter no king arose for many generations to lay claim to supreme power, but the city-states, enjoying a regimen of their own, were administered in a democratic fashion". [7] [8]

Herodotus writes "After Assyrians had ruled upper Asia for five hundred and twenty years, the Medes were the first who began to revolt from them. These, it would seem, proved their bravery in fighting for freedom against the Assyrians; they cast off their slavery and won freedom. Afterwards, the other subject nations, too, did the same as the Medes. All of those on the mainland were now free men; but they came to be ruled by monarchs again, as I will now relate. There was among the Medes a clever man called Deioces: he was the son of Phraortes. Deioces was infatuated with sovereignty, and so he set about gaining it. Already a notable man in his own town (one of the many towns into which Media was divided), he began to profess and practice justice more constantly and zealously than ever, and he did this even though he knew that injustice is always the enemy of justice. Then the Medes of the same town, seeing his behavior, chose him to be their judge, and he (for he coveted sovereign power) was honest and just. By acting so, he won no small praise from his fellow townsmen, to such an extent that when the men of the other towns learned that Deioces alone gave fair judgments (having before suffered from unjust decisions), they came often and gladly to plead before Deioces; and at last they would submit to no arbitration but his. The number of those who came grew ever greater, for they heard that each case turned out in accord with the truth. Then Deioces seeing that everything now depend on him, would not sit in his former sear of judgment, and said he would give no more decisions; for it was of no advantage to him (he said) to leave his own business and spend all day judging the cases of his neighbors. This caused robbery and lawlessness to increase greatly in the towns; and, gathering together, the Medes conferred about their present affairs, and said (here, as IP suppose, the main speakers were Deioces' friends), 'since we cannot go on living in the present way in the land, come, let us set up a king over us; in this way the land will be well governed, and we ourselves shall attend to our business and not be routed by lawlessness.' With such words they persuaded themselves to be ruled by a king." [9] [10] [11] So in this way people were electing their kings. [11]

Achaemenids

Herodotus puts great emphasis on the fact that the proposals put forward included the idea of establishing "democracy" in Persia. [12] Herodotus in Histories gives an account on a debate over the constitution of Iran (Persia) in 522 BC, where Otanes argued in favor of democracy, [13] [14] the principle of equality before the law, [15] and the accountable government. [16] [17] He advocates a complete democracy, [18] on the grounds that under a democratic system "offices of state are exercised by lot". [19]

In that session, Otanes also talked about the disadvantages of monarchy. [20] He notes that democratic rule does not share any of the malice of a tyranny. [21] Otanes was one of the seven members who overthrew Gaumata. [22] [23]

He recommended that the management of public affairs should be entrusted to the whole nation. He said, "it seems advisable, that we should no longer have a single man to rule over us. the rule of one is neither good nor pleasant... How indeed is it possible that monarchy should be a well-adjusted thing, when it allows a man to do as he likes without being answerable?... I vote, therefore, that we do away with monarchy, and raise the people to power. For the people are all in all." [24] [25] [26]

Otanes seems to find democracy inherently more equitable: "the rule of many has first a name attaching to it which is the fairest of all names, that is to say 'Equality.'" [19] [27] [28] [29] [30] Popular government ensures moderate rule, he suggests. [31]

The book "The Archaic Smile of Herodotus" notes that "in arguing that democracy will be good for Persia, Otanes contradicts himself, for he proposes to change the traditional form of government. This violation of ancient custom is just the practice of which he accuses tyrants." [32] However Otanes was advocating a return to the equality and democracy that was customary in ancient Persia. So violation of these customs was what he was accusing tyrants about. [33] Perhaps Otanes considered democracy reflecting Persia's tribal roots. [34]

Even though Otanes has not used the term demokratia in his speech, but his emphasis on equality under the law, elections by lot, and collective decisions makes it clear that he represents the democratic viewpoint. [35] Some scholars have gone further by considering that not only Otanes was in fact advocating the democracy, but also "a pretty radical form of it". [36]

Some scholars have tended to equate Otanes' arguments with those of the author himself (Herodotus). [37] Others have titled Otanes as "the champion of democracy". [38]

According to Aristotle the three parts of a politeia are the deliberative, the magistracies, and the judiciary. This tripartite structure of the politeia was a traditional idea; Aristotle only elaborated upon it. The threefold division is already evident in Otanes' defence of democracy, where he defends democracy for its virtues in all three areas. [39]

From the viewpoint of the methodological approach, Otanes provided a "practical example" of Cambyses, that how he acted as a monarch in power.[ citation needed ] The moral force of Otanes' argument derives from his conviction that monarchy and oligarchy have proven untrustworthy, insofar as natural vanity is bound to corrupt even good individuals if left unchecked. [31] [38]

In addition to book 3, later in book 6 Herodotus once again insists that the account of the debate is historical, and he vents his spleen at those who deny that Otanes advised the Persians to demokrateesthai. [40] [41]

Arsacids

At the time of Parthians, kings held absolute power over succession but were still greatly influenced by the Parthian parliament, Magistan (in Greek: Megisthanes). The parliament was of two parts: one of the wise men and magi from across the country, and the second the relatives of the royal family. [42] [43]

The two parts separately and together, formed three different councils. A third could be assembled, as the result of emergencies, comprising the members of two other councils. This council (comprising the two) was called the Megisthanes. [44] Strabo writes that "the Council of the Parthians, according to Poseidonius, consists of two groups, one that of kinsmen, and the other that of wise men and Magi, from both of which groups the kings were appointed." [45] [46] [47] The "wise men" in the parliament typically exceeded the magi. [48]

Megisthanes was the first parliament of Iran. [49] [50] The first session of the Megisthanes parliament, was held in Nowruz of the year 137 BC, where Mithridates I personally attended the council. [51] It can be concluded that the Parthian parliament was the result of the achievements of past civilizations specially the Achaemenids (whose royal courts were similar to the Parthian councils) and Greeks. [52] Justin (41.2.2) proclaims this parliament a senate in Parthia. [53] [54] [55] Tacitus states that the parliament was composed of 300 of the rich and wise men. The people had somewhat of a voice in the parliament. As long as the parliament and people had consensus, they the Parthian kings would have to respect their advice. However, with fracturing disagreements, council political parties could often form. Artabanus III's removal and reinstallation are an example of the council's power and show the role of the parliament in reinstating the king's power, or taking it away. Much of the aristocratic group in the council comprised the Seven Great Houses of Iran, continuing the Achaemenid tradition. This tradition would continue from the Achaemenid dynasty to the Sassanids as a key aspect of the court. [56] [57] Over the same provoke, in wake of eras there had appeared conflicting views towards its constituent structure and naming conventions. Some abstractive attempts have compared the bicameral congress of both ensembles with Majlis, while considering the ensemble of wise experienced men to be Mahestan, and the ensemble of royals and religious influentials as Moghestan. [58]

The Parthian kingdom was not solely based on absolutism, but there was a parliament of sorts where important issues were being resolved discussed. [52] [59] While there is no concrete evidence for either an election of the king or a true separation of powers between the monarchy and the council, the dynamics of the royal court and the kings' necessity to please the Seven Great Houses of Iran guarantee that for the king to interfere with the council would have been a disastrous political move. [60] Justin considers one of the reasons for the collapse of Parthian empire to be the power of this council and the extreme actions of its members. [56]

Related Research Articles

The Persians are an Iranian ethnic group who comprise over half of the population of Iran. They share a common cultural system and are native speakers of the Persian language as well as of the languages that are closely related to Persian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Darius the Great</span> Persian ruler from 522 to 486 BCE

Darius I, commonly known as Darius the Great, was a Persian ruler who served as the third King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire, reigning from 522 BCE until his death in 486 BCE. He ruled the empire at its territorial peak, when it included much of Western Asia, parts of the Balkans and the Caucasus, most of the Black Sea's coastal regions, Central Asia, the Indus Valley in the far east, and portions of North Africa and Northeast Africa including Egypt (Mudrâya), eastern Libya, and coastal Sudan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medes</span> Ancient Iranian people

The Medes were an ancient Iranian people who spoke the Median language and who inhabited an area known as Media between western and northern Iran. Around the 11th century BC, they occupied the mountainous region of northwestern Iran and the northeastern and eastern region of Mesopotamia in the vicinity of Ecbatana. Their consolidation in Iran is believed to have occurred during the 8th century BC. In the 7th century BC, all of western Iran and some other territories were under Median rule, but their precise geographic extent remains unknown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecbatana</span> Ancient city that served as the capital of the Median Empire

Ecbatana was an ancient city, the capital of the Median kingdom, and the first capital in Iranian history. It later became the summer capital of the Achaemenid and Parthian empires. It was also an important city during the Seleucid and Sasanian empires. It is believed that Ecbatana is located in the Zagros Mountains, the east of central Mesopotamia, on Hagmatana Hill. Ecbatana's strategic location and resources probably made it a popular site even before the 1st millennium BC. Along with Athens in Greece, Rome in Italy and Susa in Khuzestan, Ecbatana is one of the few ancient cities in the world that is still alive and important, representing the current-day Hamadan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deioces</span> King of the Medes from 700 to 678 BCE

Deioces was the founder and the first King of the Median kingdom, an ancient polity in western Asia. His name has been mentioned in different forms in various sources, including the Ancient Greek historian Herodotus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyrus the Great</span> Founder of the Achaemenid Empire (c. 600–530 BC)

Cyrus II of Persia, commonly known as Cyrus the Great, was the founder of the Achaemenid Empire. Hailing from Persis, he brought the Achaemenid dynasty to power by defeating the Median Empire and embracing all of the previous civilized states of the ancient Near East, expanding vastly and eventually conquering most of West Asia and much of Central Asia to create what would soon become the largest polity in human history at the time. The Achaemenid Empire's largest territorial extent was achieved under Darius the Great, whose rule stretched from the Balkans and the rest of Southeast Europe in the west to the Indus Valley in the east.

Median was the language of the Medes. It is an extinct ancient Iranian language and classified as a distinct language belonging to the Northwestern Iranian subfamily, which includes many other more recently attested languages such as Kurdish, Old Azeri, Talysh, Gilaki, Mazandarani, Zaza–Gorani and Baluchi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Name of Iran</span>

Historically, Iran was commonly referred to as "Persia" in the Western world. Likewise, the modern-day ethnonym "Persian" was typically used as a demonym for all Iranian nationals, regardless of whether or not they were ethnic Persians. This terminology prevailed until 1935, when, during an international gathering for Nowruz, the Iranian king Reza Shah Pahlavi officially requested that foreign delegates begin using the endonym "Iran" in formal correspondence. Subsequently, "Iran" and "Iranian" were standardized as the terms referring to the country and its citizens, respectively. Later, in 1959, Pahlavi's son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi announced that it was appropriate to use both "Persia" and "Iran" in formal correspondence. However, the issue is still debated among Iranians. A variety of scholars from the Middle Ages, such as the Persian polymath Al-Biruni, also used terms like "Xuniras" to refer to Iran: "which is the center of the world, [...] and it is the one wherein we are, and the kings called it the Iranian realm."

The Median dynasty was, according to the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, a dynasty composed of four kings who ruled for 150 years under the Median Empire. If Herodotus' story is true, the Medes were unified by a man named Deioces, the first of the four kings who would rule the Median Empire, a mighty empire that included large parts of Iran and eastern Anatolia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Media (region)</span> Ancient region located in north-western Iran

Media is a region of north-western Iran, best known for having been the political and cultural base of the Medes. During the Achaemenid period, it comprised present-day Iranian Azerbaijan, Iranian Kurdistan and western Tabaristan. As a satrapy under Achaemenid rule, it would eventually encompass a wider region, stretching to southern Dagestan in the north. However, after the wars of Alexander the Great, the northern parts were separated due to the Partition of Babylon and became known as Atropatene, while the remaining region became known as Lesser Media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megabazus</span> 6th century BC Persian general

Megabazus, son of Megabates, was a highly regarded Persian general under Darius, to whom he was a first-degree cousin. Most of the information about Megabazus comes from The Histories by Herodotus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greater Iran</span> Sociocultural region in Central Asia

Greater Iran or Greater Persia, also called the Iranosphere or the Persosphere, is an expression that denotes a wide socio-cultural region comprising parts of West Asia, the Caucasus, Central Asia, South Asia, and East Asia —all of which have been affected, to some degree, by the Iranian peoples and the Iranian languages. It is defined by having been long ruled by the dynasties of various Iranian empires, under whom the local populaces gradually incorporated some degree of Iranian influence into their cultural and/or linguistic traditions; or alternatively as where a considerable number of Iranians settled to still maintain communities who patronize their respective cultures, geographically corresponding to the areas surrounding the Iranian plateau. It is referred to as the "Iranian Cultural Continent" by Encyclopædia Iranica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaveh Farrokh</span> Greek historian of Iran

Kaveh Farrokh is a Greek author of several academic books and peer-reviewed publications specializing in Iranian history, and has been a frequent lecturer on Iran-related topics at the University of British Columbia as part of the UBC Continuing Education program. Currently, he is a counselor and learning specialist at Langara College in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Maka was a satrapy (province) of the Achaemenid Empire and later a satrapy of the Parthian and Sassanian empires, corresponding to Greek Gedrosia, in the barren coastal areas of modern Pakistan and Iranian Baluchistan. Alternatively, it may have corresponded to modern day Bahrain, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates, plus the northern half of Oman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medo-Persian conflict</span> Military conflict between the Median kingdom and Persis

The Medo-Persian conflict was a military campaign led by the Median king Astyages against Persis in the mid 6th-century BCE. Classical sources claim that Persis had been a vassal of the Median kingdom that revolted against Median rule, but this is not confirmed by contemporary evidence. After some battles the Persians led by Cyrus the Great emerged victorious, subsequently conquering Median territories and establishing the Achaemenid Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syloson</span> Late 6th century BC Persian vassal ruler of Samos

Syloson governed Samos as a vassal ruler on behalf of the Achaemenid Persian Empire. He was appointed by king Darius I and was the brother of Polycrates of Samos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skudra</span> Achaemenid province

Skudra was a province (satrapy) of the Persian Achaemenid Empire in Europe between 510s BC and 479 BC. Its name is attested in Persian and Egyptian inscriptions (an Egyptian record of c. 498–497 BC, and a list on the tomb of Darius the Great at Naqsh-e Rustam, c. 486 BC. It is believed to have comprised the lands now known as Thrace and Macedon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achaemenid Empire</span> Ancient Iranian empire (550–330 BC)

The Achaemenid Empire or Achaemenian Empire, also known as the Persian Empire or First Persian Empire, was an Iranian empire founded by Cyrus the Great of the Achaemenid dynasty in 550 BC. Based in modern-day Iran, it was the largest empire by that point in history, spanning a total of 5.5 million square kilometres. The empire spanned from the Balkans and Egypt in the west, West Asia as the base, the majority of Central Asia to the northeast, and the Indus Valley to the southeast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seifollah Kambakhshfard</span>

Seifollah Kambakhshfard was an Iranian archaeologist, who specialized in archaeology and Ancient history of Iran.

The history of the parliament in Iran refers to the history of this legislative body in Iran, which has gone through various stages. This legislative body has been changing and expanding from a 25-member House of Expediency to the present day, which operates under the name of the Islamic Consultative Assembly with 290 members.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "ZOROASTRIAN RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY". zoroastrian.org. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  2. ↑ "Zoroastrian sacred text: the holy book of avesta". persepolis.nu. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  3. ↑ Yasna 30, paragraph 2
  4. ↑ "AVESTA: YASNA: Sacred Liturgy and Gathas/Hymns of Zarathushtra". avesta.org. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  5. 1 2 "اشوزرتشت نخستین پیام آور دموکراسی و حقوق بشر در جهان". tarikhfa (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  6. ↑ "Ahunuvaiti Gatha: Yasna 30". Zarathushtra. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  7. ↑ Diodorus 9.20
  8. ↑ "Diodorus Siculus, Library, Fragments of Book 9, Chapter 20". Perseus. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  9. ↑ Herodotus, Histories, 1.96
  10. ↑ Herodotus (2013). Delphi Complete Works of Herodotus (Illustrated) Volume 5 of Delphi Ancient Classics. Delphi Classics. ISBN   9781909496453.
  11. 1 2 "دموکراسی در تاریخ کهن ایران". melimazhabi (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  12. ↑ Canfora, Luciano (2008). Democracy in Europe: A History of an Ideoloy Volume 5 of Making of Europe. John Wiley & Sons. p. 21. ISBN   9781405154598.
  13. ↑ "Otanes". Livius.org. Livius. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  14. ↑ "Otanes of Persia". rpi.edu. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  15. ↑ "Otanes". Encyclopaedia Iranica. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  16. ↑ "Democracy in Herodotus, Democracy in America". columbia.edu. Columbia College. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  17. ↑ Maloy, J. S. (2008). The Colonial American Origins of Modern Democratic Thought . Cambridge University Press. pp.  28. ISBN   9781139473477.
  18. ↑ Höffe, Otfried (2003). Aristotle SUNY series in Ancient Greek Philosophy. SUNY Press. p. 178. ISBN   9780791456347.
  19. 1 2 "Ancient Greece's Legacy for Liberty: Herodotus and the Way of Otanes". libertarianism.org. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  20. ↑ "اوتانه". تارنمای تخصصی تاریخ ایران (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  21. ↑ Martin, Brad (Fall 2011). "Herodotus, Politics and Athenian Democracy" (PDF). Xavier Journal of Politics. 2: 46–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-22. Retrieved 2016-09-02.
  22. ↑ "تاریخچه نوروز باستانی از نگاهی دیگر". BBC Persian. BBC. 22 March 2010. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  23. ↑ E. McCarthy, George (2009). Dreams in Exile: Rediscovering Science and Ethics in Nineteenth-Century Social Theory. SUNY Press. p. 59. ISBN   9781438425979.
  24. ↑ "Herodotus: 3.80-97". The Latin Library. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  25. ↑ "The History of Herodotus". Sacred Texts. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  26. ↑ "Herodotus: Book three". Reed. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  27. ↑ "Introduction: Measures of Democratization" (PDF). prio.org. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  28. ↑ Brock, Roger; Hodkinson, Stephen (2002). Alternatives to Athens: Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient Greece Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN   9780199258109.
  29. ↑ A. Raaflaub, Kurt; Ober, Josiah; Wallace, Robert (2007). Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece Joan Palevsky Imprint in Classical Literature. University of California Press. p. 158. ISBN   9780520932173.
  30. ↑ Hart, John (2014). Herodotus and Greek History (Routledge Revivals). Routledge. p. 71. ISBN   9781317678380.
  31. 1 2 Monoson, S. Sara (2000). Plato's Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy . Princeton University Press. p.  121. ISBN   9781400823741.
  32. ↑ Flory, Stewart (1987). The Archaic Smile of Herodotus. Wayne State University Press. p. 132. ISBN   9780814318270.
  33. ↑ Canfora, Luciano (2008). Democracy in Europe: A History of an Ideoloy Volume 5 of Making of Europe. John Wiley & Sons. p. 21. ISBN   9781405154598.
  34. ↑ Butler, Clark (2008). Human Rights Ethics: A Rational Approach Purdue (human rights studies series). Purdue University Press. p. 54. ISBN   9781557534804.
  35. ↑ "Freedom and Power in Classical Athens" (PDF). washington.edu. University of Washington. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  36. ↑ Cartledge, Paul (2016). Democracy: A Life. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780190494322.
  37. ↑ Krieger Balot, Ryan (2001). Greed and Injustice in Classical Athens . Princeton University Press. p.  116. ISBN   9780691048550.
  38. 1 2 Ward, L.; King, Bruce (2014). Modern Democracy and the Theological-Political Problem in Spinoza, Rousseau, and Jefferson Recovering Political Philosophy. Springer. p. 10. ISBN   9781137475053.
  39. ↑ Clausen, Wendell (1981). Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Volume 94 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology Series). Harvard University Press. pp. 159–160. ISBN   9780674379428.
  40. ↑ Herodotus, Histories, 6.43.3
  41. ↑ Tolbert Roberts, Jennifer (2011). Athens on Trial: The Antidemocratic Tradition in Western Thought. Princeton University Press. ISBN   9781400821327.
  42. ↑ "مهستان، نخستین مجلس رسمی ایرانیان". Ghatreh (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  43. ↑ "Who were the Magi?". fivedoves.com. 13 Dec 2010. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  44. ↑ "اشکانیان". roshd.ir (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  45. ↑ Strabo, Geographica, book 11, chapter 9, section 3
  46. ↑ "Strabo, Geography". Perseus. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  47. ↑ "Strabo, Geography". Perseus. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  48. ↑ Pirnia, Hassan. Tarikh-e Iran-e Bastan (Volume 3). Tehran: Majles. p. 2234.
  49. ↑ "تاریخچه مجلس در ایران؛ از مهستان تا بهارستان". TarikhIrani (in Persian). تاریخ ایرانی. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  50. ↑ "نگاهی به تاریخچه مجلس در ایران". basironline (in Persian). بصیر آنلاین. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  51. ↑ "مهستان، نخستین مجلس رسمی ایرانیان". Ilna (in Persian). ایلنا: خبرگزاری کار ایران. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  52. 1 2 "نگاهی به مجلس‌های ایران در دوران اشکانی". Kheradgan (in Persian). Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  53. ↑ Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus, Justin, book 41, section 2, part 2
  54. ↑ "واژه (مهستان) یادگاری از مجالس باستان". ParsianDej (in Persian). پارسیان دژ. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  55. ↑ کریستن‌سن, آرتور (1388). ایران در زمان ساسانیان (in Persian). تهران: راستی نو. p. 36.
  56. 1 2 "مقایسه مجلس مهستان دوره اشکانی با مجلس اول مشروطه". JameJamOnline (in Persian). Archived from the original on 22 October 2016. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  57. ↑ "اشكانيان كه بودند". IranAtlas (in Persian). Retrieved 2 September 2016.
  58. ↑ Khamseh, Mohammad. "Mahestan and Moghestan: An etymologic regrouping for better figuring out the Arsacids parliament". Medium. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  59. ↑ پیرنیا, حسن (1306). ایران باستان (جلد ۱) (in Persian). تهران: مجلس. p. 257.
  60. ↑ پیرنیا, حسن (1306). ایران باستان. جلد 3 (in Persian). تهران: مجلس. p. 2233.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.