Ducking stool

Last updated
Illustration from a Pearson Scott Foresman text book Ducking-Stool 1 (PSF).png
Illustration from a Pearson Scott Foresman text book
Punishing a woman accused of excessive arguing in the ducking stool Old woman draught at Ratcliffe Highway.png
Punishing a woman accused of excessive arguing in the ducking stool

Ducking stools or cucking stools were chairs formerly used for punishment of disorderly women, scolds, and dishonest tradesmen in medieval Europe [1] and elsewhere at later times. [2] The cucking-stool was a form of wymen pine, or "women's punishment", as referred to in Langland's Piers Plowman (1378). They were instruments of public humiliation and censure both primarily for the offense of scolding or backbiting and less often for sexual offences like bearing an illegitimate child or prostitution.

Contents

The stools were technical devices which formed part of the wider method of law enforcement through social humiliation. A common alternative was a court order to recite one’s crimes or sins after Mass or in the market place on market day or informal action such as a Skimmington ride. They were usually of local manufacture with no standard design. Most were simply chairs into which the offender could be tied and exposed at her door or the site of her offence. Some were on wheels like a tumbrel that could be dragged around the parish. Some were put on poles so that they could be plunged into water, hence "ducking" stool. Stocks or pillories were similarly used for the punishment of men or women by humiliation.

The term "cucking-stool" is older, with written records dating back to the 13th and 14th centuries. Written records for the name "ducking stool" appear from 1597, and a statement in 1769 relates that "ducking-stool" is a corruption of the term "cucking-stool". [3] Whereas a cucking-stool could be and was used for humiliation with or without dunking the person in water, the name "ducking-stool" came to be used more specifically for those cucking-stools on an oscillating plank which were used to duck the person into water. [4]

Cucking-stools

A ballad, dating from about 1615, called "The Cucking of a Scold", illustrates the punishment inflicted to women whose behaviour made them be identified as "a Scold":

Then was the Scold herself,
In a wheelbarrow brought,
Stripped naked to the smock,
As in that case she ought:
Neats tongues about her neck
Were hung in open show;
And thus unto the cucking stool
This famous scold did go. [5]

The cucking-stool, or Stool of Repentance , has a long history, and was used by the Saxons, who called it the scealding or scolding stool. It is mentioned in Domesday Book as being in use at Chester, being called cathedra stercoris, a name which seems to confirm the first of the derivations suggested in the footnote below. Tied to this stool the woman—her head and feet bare—was publicly exposed at her door or paraded through the streets amidst the jeers of the crowd. [6]

The term cucking-stool is known to have been in use from about 1215. It means literally "defecation chair", as its name is derived from the old verb cukken and has not quite been rid of in many parts of the English speaking world as "to cack" (defecate) (akin to Dutch kakken and Latin cacāre [same meaning]; cf. Greek κακός/κακή ["bad/evil, vile, ugly, worthless"]), rather than, as popularly believed, from the word cuckold .[ citation needed ]

Both seem to have become more common in the second half of the sixteenth century. It has been suggested this reflected developing strains in gender relations, but it may simply be a result of the differential survival of records. The cucking-stool appears to have still been in use as late as the mid-18th century, with Poor Robin's Almanack of 1746 observing:

Now, if one cucking-stool was for each scold,
Some towns, I fear, would not their numbers hold.

Ducking-stools

Ducking or cucking stool, a historical punishment for the common scold, 1896 The Ducking-Stool from Curious Punishments of Bygone Days (1896).jpg
Ducking or cucking stool, a historical punishment for the common scold, 1896

The ducking-stool was a strongly-made wooden armchair (the surviving specimens are of oak) in which the offender was seated, an iron band being placed around them so that they should not fall out during their immersion. The earliest record of the use of such is towards the beginning of the 17th century, [6] with the term being first attested in English in 1597. It was used both in Europe and in the English colonies of North America. [7]

Usually, the chair was fastened to a long wooden beam fixed as a seesaw on the edge of a pond or river. Sometimes, however, the ducking-stool was not a fixture but was mounted on a pair of wooden wheels so that it could be wheeled through the streets, and at the river-edge was hung by a chain from the end of a beam. In sentencing a woman the magistrates ordered the number of duckings she should have. Yet another type of ducking-stool was called a tumbrel. It was a chair on two wheels with two long shafts fixed to the axles. This was pushed into the pond and then the shafts released, thus tipping the chair up backwards. Sometimes the punishment proved fatal and the subject died. [6]

Use in identifying witches

In medieval times until the early 18th century, ducking was a way used to establish whether a suspect was a witch. [8] The ducking stools were first used for this purpose but ducking was later inflicted without the chair. In this instance the subject's right thumb was bound to her left big toe. A rope was tied around the waist of the accused and she was thrown into a river or deep pond. If she floated, it was deemed that she was in league with the devil, rejecting the baptismal water. If she sank, she was "cleared. And dead". [9] [ better source needed ]

Notable examples

Surviving examples

The tumbrel of a ducking stool is in the crypt of the Collegiate Church of St Mary, Warwick. There is also a ducking chair in Canterbury, where the High Street meets the River Stour. [10]

A surviving ducking stool is on public display outside the Criminal Museum (Kriminalmuseum) [11] in Rothenburg ob der Tauber, a well-preserved medieval town in Bavaria, Germany.

Replicas

Replica ducking stool at Leominster, England; last used in 1809 The Ducking Stool at Leominster - geograph.org.uk - 15898.jpg
Replica ducking stool at Leominster, England; last used in 1809

A complete ducking stool is on public display in Leominster Priory, Herefordshire. The town clock, commissioned for the Millennium, features a moving ducking stool depiction.[ citation needed ]

Christchurch, Dorset, continues to house a replica ducking stool, at the site where punishments were once carried out. [12]

Early mentions

There is a reference from about 1378 to a ducking stool as wymen pine ("women's punishment"), [13]

In film

A type of ducking stool can be seen briefly in the film Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975).

In the Laurel and Hardy feature film Babes in Toyland , Laurel and Hardy are sentenced to the ducking stool, followed by banishment to Boogeyland, for burgling Barnaby's house.[ citation needed ]

Demise

The last recorded cases are those of a Mrs Ganble at Plymouth (1808); Jenny Pipes, a "notorious scold" (1809), and Sarah Leeke (1817), both of Leominster. In the last case, the water in the pond was so low that the offender was merely wheeled around the town in the chair. [6] The common law offence of common scold was extant in New Jersey until struck down in 1972 by Circuit Judge McCann who found it had been subsumed in the provisions of the Disorderly Conduct Act of 1898, was bad for vagueness and offended the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution for sex discrimination. Long before this decision, the punishment of ducking, together with all other forms of corporal punishment, had become unlawful under the provisions of the New Jersey Constitution of 1844 or even as early as 1776. [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flagellation</span> Whipping as a punishment

Flagellation, flogging or whipping is the act of beating the human body with special implements such as whips, rods, switches, the cat o' nine tails, the sjambok, the knout, etc. Typically, flogging has been imposed on an unwilling subject as a punishment; however, it can also be submitted to willingly and even done by oneself in sadomasochistic or religious contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punishment</span> Imposition of an undesirable or unpleasant outcome

Punishment, commonly, is the imposition of an undesirable or unpleasant outcome upon a group or individual, meted out by an authority—in contexts ranging from child discipline to criminal law—as a response and deterrent to a particular action or behavior that is deemed undesirable or unacceptable. It is, however, possible to distinguish between various different understandings of what punishment is.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keelhauling</span> Form of punishment for sailors

Keelhauling is a form of punishment and potential execution once meted out to sailors at sea. The sailor was tied to a line looped beneath the vessel, thrown overboard on one side of the ship, and dragged under the ship's keel, either from one side of the ship to the other, or the length of the ship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penal transportation</span> Relocation of convicted criminals to a distant place

Penal transportation was the relocation of convicted criminals, or other persons regarded as undesirable, to a distant place, often a colony, for a specified term; later, specifically established penal colonies became their destination. While the prisoners may have been released once the sentences were served, they generally did not have the resources to return home.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pillory</span> Whipping-post

The pillory is a device made of a wooden or metal framework erected on a post, with holes for securing the head and hands, formerly used for punishment by public humiliation and often further physical abuse. The pillory is related to the stocks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scold's bridle</span> 16th-century instrument of punishment or torture

A scold's bridle, sometimes called a witch's bridle, a gossip's bridle, a brank's bridle, or simply branks, was an instrument of punishment, as a form of public humiliation. It was an iron muzzle in an iron framework that enclosed the head. A bridle-bit, about 5 cm × 2.5 cm in size, was slid into the mouth and pressed down on top of the tongue, often with a spike on the tongue, as a compress. It functioned to silence the wearer from speaking entirely, and caused extreme pain and physiological trauma to scare and intimidate the wearer into submission. The scold's bridle was used primarily on women. This prevented speaking and resulted in many unpleasant side effects for the wearer, including excessive salivation and fatigue in the mouth. For extra humiliation, a bell could also be attached to draw in crowds. The wearer was then led around town by a leash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Ohio</span> Legal penalty in Ohio

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Ohio, although all executions have been suspended indefinitely by Governor Mike DeWine until a replacement for lethal injection is chosen by the Ohio General Assembly. The last execution in the state was in July 2018, when Robert J. Van Hook was executed via lethal injection for murder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birching</span> Type of corporal punishment

Birching is a form of corporal punishment with a birch rod, typically applied to the recipient's bare buttocks, although occasionally to the back and/or shoulders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public humiliation</span> Form of punishment whose main feature is dishonoring or disgracing a person

Public humiliation or public shaming is a form of punishment whose main feature is dishonoring or disgracing a person, usually an offender or a prisoner, especially in a public place. It was regularly used as a form of judicially sanctioned punishment in previous centuries, and is still practiced by different means in the modern era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common scold</span> Troublesome person in English law

In the common law of crime in England and Wales, a common scold was a type of public nuisance—a troublesome and angry person who broke the public peace by habitually chastising, arguing, and quarrelling with their neighbours. Most punished for scolding were women, though men could be found to be scolds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jougs</span> Metal collar formerly used as an instrument of punishment

The jougs, juggs, or joggs is a metal collar formerly used as an instrument of punishment in Scotland, the Netherlands and other countries. When the soldiers of Cromwell's army occupied Scotland they were horrified at the church using such a punishment and many were removed from church walls and destroyed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dunk tank</span> Attraction with the goal of dropping a target into a tank of water

A dunk tank, also known as a dunking booth or dunking machine, is a common feature at Canadian and American fairs, fundraisers, and celebrations. It consists of a human-sized water tank with a person sitting on a collapsible bench above, along with a target. When the ball hits the target, the seat collapses and "dunks" the person into the water. People often volunteer to be dunked while fully dressed for comedic effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Malaysia</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is used as a form of corporal punishment in Malaysia. It can be divided into at least four contexts: judicial/prison, school, domestic, and sharia/syariah. Of these, the first is largely a legacy of British colonial rule in the territories that are now part of Malaysia, particularly Malaya.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shrew (stock character)</span> Stock character; woman given to violent, scolding, particularly nagging treatment

The shrew – an unpleasant, ill-tempered woman characterised by scolding, nagging, and aggression – is a comedic, stock character in literature and folklore, both Western and Eastern. The theme is illustrated in Shakespeare's play The Taming of the Shrew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cowan Bridge School</span> School in Lancashire, England

Cowan Bridge School refers to the Clergy Daughters' School, founded in the 1820s, located in Cowan Bridge in the English county of Lancashire. It was a school mainly for the daughters of middle class clergy and attended by the Brontë sisters. In the 1830s it moved to Casterton, a few miles away.

Daṇḍa is the Hindu term for punishment. In ancient India, the ruler generally sanctioned punishments but other legal officials could also play a part. Punishments were handed out in response to criminal activity. In the Hindu law tradition, the counterpart to daṇḍa is prāyaścitta. Whereas daṇḍa was primarily sanctioned by the king, prāyaścitta is taken up by a person at his or her own volition. Daṇḍa provides a way for an offender to correct any violations of dharma he or she may have committed. Daṇḍa functions as the ruler's tool to protect the system of life stages and castes. Daṇḍa is part of vyavahāra, which was also a responsibility afforded to the king.

The iron bit, also referred to as a gag, was used by enslavers and overseers as a form of punishment on slaves in the Southern United States. The bit, sometimes depicted as the scold's bridle, uses similar mechanics to that of the common horse bit. The scolds bridle however, is almost always associated with its use on women in the early 17th century and there are very few accounts of the device as a method of torture against black slaves under that particular name. As opposed to the whip, the iron bit lacks the historic, social, and literary symbolic fame that would make information on the use of the iron bit as accessible. Its use throughout history has warranted some attention though, mostly from literary texts. Even earlier, slave narratives and publications of newspapers and magazines from the 18th century on give evidence of this device being used to torture and punish slaves.

Grace White Sherwood (1660–1740), called the Witch of Pungo, is the last person known to have been convicted of witchcraft in Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clattern Bridge</span> Bridge in Kingston upon Thames

The Clattern Bridge is a bridge over the Hogsmill River in Kingston upon Thames. It was built around 1175 and is thus one of the oldest intact bridges in England. It replaced an older Saxon bridge which was known as the Clatrung Bridge. Its various names, such as the Clateryngbrugge, are thought to derive from the clattering of horses' hooves as they crossed the bridge. The bridge still carries a full load of modern vehicle traffic.

References

  1. Underdown, David (1985). "The Taming of the Scold: Enforcement of Patriarchal Authority in Early Modern England". In Fletcher, A.; Stephenson, J. (eds.). Order and Disorder in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 116–136. ISBN   0-521-25294-6. OCLC   17289313. Archived from the original on 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2018-05-31.
  2. Oxford English Dictionary includes dishonest tradesmen as well as disorderly women and scolds as people for whom the cucking-stool was used and cites its use in Vienna and that "The punishment of the ducking stool cannot be inflicted in Pennsylvania." which by implication suggests that it could be used in some other parts of the USA. http://oed.com/view/Entry/58195?redirectedFrom=ducking+stool Archived 2023-06-08 at the Wayback Machine accessed 27 Nov 2012.
  3. Oxford English Dictionary. "Cucking-stool" has references in 1215-70 and c.1308, including the use of the cucking-stool for immersion in water (c1308, 1534, 1633). http://oed.com/view/Entry/45498?redirectedFrom=cucking-stool#eid Archived 2018-10-27 at the Wayback Machine and ...ducking-stool accessed 27 Nov 2012.
  4. Oxford English Dictionary. http://oed.com/view/Entry/58195?redirectedFrom=ducking+stool Archived 2023-06-08 at the Wayback Machine accessed 27 Nov 2012.
  5. Rollins, Hyder E. (1971). A Pepysian Garland. Harvard University Press. pp.  72–77. ISBN   0-674-66185-0.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Wikisource-logo.svg One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain:  Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ducking and Cucking Stools". Encyclopædia Britannica . Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 631. Citations:
  7. Cox, James A. "Bilboes, Brands, and Branks Archived 2019-08-10 at the Wayback Machine : Colonial Crimes and Punishments." Colonial Williamsburg Journal, Spring, 2003. Accessed 30 Sept. 2012.
  8. Behringer, Wolfgang (2004). Witches and witch-hunts: a global history. Themes in history. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 164. ISBN   0-7456-2718-8.
  9. Shapira, Ian (July 12, 2006). "After Toil and Trouble, 'Witch' Is Cleared". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2022-02-28. Retrieved 2010-10-22.
  10. Wright, Joe (12 June 2020). "Canterbury's ducking stool at centre of debate after opponents suggest its removal". KentOnline.co.uk. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  11. "Home - Mittelalterliches Kriminalmuseum". 2021-07-05. Archived from the original on 2023-06-24. Retrieved 2023-06-19.
  12. "A ghoulish tour of medieval punishments". BBC News. 2 July 2016. Archived from the original on 2017-09-15. Retrieved 2017-07-10.
  13. Langland's Piers Plowman , B.V.29.
  14. State of New Jersey v. Marion Palendrano, 120 N.J. Super. 336 (1972)McCann JCC (Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal)13 July 1972).