Federalist No. 8

Last updated

Federalist No. 8
Alexander Hamilton A17950.jpg
Alexander Hamilton, author of Federalist No. 8
Author Alexander Hamilton
Original titleConsequences of Hostilities Between the States
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Series The Federalist
PublisherNew York Packet
Publication date
November 20, 1787
Media typeNewspaper
Preceded by Federalist No. 7  
Followed by Federalist No. 9  

Federalist No. 8 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the eighth of The Federalist Papers . It was first published in The New York Packet on November 20, 1787 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. In it, Hamilton argues for the utility of the Union to the well-being of Americans, specifically addressing the negative consequences if the Union were to collapse and conflict arise between the states. It is titled "Consequences of Hostilities Between the States".

Contents

Essay Synopsis

If the states do not unify into a single nation there will be a perpetual cycle of conflict between neighboring states. Their alliances or disunions create circumstances similar to European nations, where the cycle of aggression between neighboring nations creates the need for domestic armies and fortifications. Additionally, if not unified, populous states motivated by greed might plunder weaker states for their resources.

The motivation for a union is safety, being aware that no matter how great the nation's commitment to liberty, some freedoms are compromised in order to achieve protection. The physical damage of armed conflict compels nations to implement a military deterrent and in doing so an overly militaristic culture diminishes the civil and political rights of the people. "To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free."

The new Constitution does not prohibit standing armies and it is inferred that a perpetual army will exist. The frequency of conflict and the need for defense will necessitate a ready armed force for defense. By its nature, a militaristic state strengthens the executive arm (from which a monarchy could emerge). War increases executive authority at the expense of the other branches of government.

Extreme defense would likely give rise to oppressive government practices.

Observing history; the livelihood of citizens cause the population to be ill suited for war. A varied workforce necessitates the development of a profession of soldiers who would be distinct from the body of the citizens.

"The military state becomes elevated above the civil." Nations without a full-time army are less likely to oppress citizens. The leaders of nations prone to invasion must maintain defensive forces, however frequently this militarism infringes upon the citizen's rights or weakens their sense of entitlement of those rights. The continental nations of Western Europe were examples of this.

Also, a Union of states would act as a deterrent from aggression by nearby foreign colonies.

Background

The creation of the 8th federalist paper was to argue to establish a proper Union and the importance of protecting it. Without a Union, or unity between states, the United States would've had little to no defensive protocols against foreign invaders. Given the United States was underdeveloped, at the time, in comparison to Great Britain, America would find it difficult to defend itself against attackers of some foreign parties. Hence the creation of a standing army was underway. However, the thought of having a professional army created doubts among the people, that they can not be completely trusted. Meaning, that if an army were to be established, it would have a great deal of power. The issue here is that the militants may misuse their power for their own advantage. Under false pretenses of protection, militants may deceive the same people they swore to protect by stealing from them; promising the people protection for something in return. Regardless of the negativities, an army was required nonetheless.

Apart from an army, the government was another form of power. Capabilities within its grasp only proved the strength it contained. If the central powers were to be distributed among the states, there is the possibility that it would not spread equally resulting in one state having more power than the other(s). Misusing the newfound authority may create conflicts between the states leading to rivalries. If these international affairs are not managed properly, the probability of the States working in unison is negligible. In other words, if the states are too busy with fighting each other, they may not protect each other.

Analysis

In terms of protection against invaders, Federalist 8 shares a strong bond with Federalist 29, Concerning the Militia. Federalist 8 states why a union should exist and why it should be protected, while Federalist 29 mentions the existence of a militia. The connection is that a union should be guarded, and the creation of a militia will ensure the preservation of a union. Since a militia is composed of civilians, it would be prepared to battle anything and anyone that dared to harm the people or their homes. Federalist 29 states that having a militia is better than having a standing army. This may contradict earlier statements, but the positive side of not having a standing army is that there is no possible threat to the people's freedom, meaning the government has the ability to control an army and the power may be misused to silence the people and in the worst case, create a dictatorship. [1] Hence, a militia was preferable and if the United States were to be attacked, a militia would be available immediately.

Four years after Federalist 8 was published, the bill to pass the Second Amendment succeeded. This only improved the benefits mentioned in Federalist 8, as it mentions to secure and protect a Union. The Second Amendment states that the people's right to bear arms will not be "infringed." Meaning that, a citizen will not be punished if he or she raises a weapon against an individual who meant harm. [2] This relates to Federalist 8, in the sense that if a group of individuals from foreign interests decided to harm the U.S., the people have the right to raise weapons against them without facing prosecution. [3]

As mentioned before, Great Britain possessed great power given that it was greatly developed in terms of government, democracy, and overall structure. Their defenses were near impenetrable. If the United States had not created a Union, Great Britain could have taken over the States. [4] The existence of an army was crucial at the time since it was the United States' secondary form of security against intruders. [5] Since Great Britain's army was ahead of its time, they also established the Royal Navy sometime afterwards. That army controlled the seas, so if the United States were to attack Britain, their army would be destroyed before they reach the shores to plan their next attack. So America's best course of action was to remain where they were and focus on the defensive, because if they Great Britain were to attack, the U.S. would instantly face a major loss.

Hamilton's finishing statement in Federalist 8 stated that in protecting the Union, it would face years of enjoyment and be stress free as long as States work in harmony to guard each other. Taking the World Wars into perspective demonstrates the extent to which Federalist 8 reaches beyond the World Wars and into the current generation. The global war on terrorism is an example of how states or countries must work together to rid themselves of a common threat. Once they understand the problem, the best solution will be determined in the form of teamwork. If the nations work together, a solution will be formed, and the more "teammates" there are, the faster the answer will be found. The two nations do not have to be the U.S. and Europe working to fight against terrorism. Nations of the world can work together to eliminate the problem. If this is accomplished, Federalist 8 remains relevant.

Federalist 8 speaks of why and how a union exists, and how it is used to protect territory against outside forces. [6] However, it does not explicitly state that a Union should be only between states. Relationships kept between two or more countries will result in a more secure future. Protection by allies from around the world, aids prosperity. A war should not be fought alone, and safeguarding a Union between two or more countries should remain a priority.

When the World War I began, no nation fought alone since the countries at war had allies. America did not enter the war, that is until the Germans sank the Lusitania ; an ocean liner that had American civilians on board. Once it declared war on Germany, America and her allies worked in unison to defeat those who meant harm.

During World War II, a similar course of actions took place. America did not to "participate" in the war until the attack on Pearl Harbor. Once it entered the game, it "partnered" with allies to defeat a common enemy and to protect its people and homes. All parties aided each other in completing a similar objective.

The United States in the past is another example, especially when it came to the thirteen colonies protecting each other against Great Britain.

A proper Union should needed to be established and a group of individuals gathered to uphold it. If one did not exist of the two, the other would be defunct. In the modern world, Federalist 8 remains applicable given that there are those who seek to cause harm. Forming a relationship with the other countries around the world improves the ability to fend off those who mean harm. The meaning behind the Federalist 8 remains the same since it applies to conflicts that have been fought in the past, present, and conflicts of the future.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Militia</span> Force of non-professional soldiers

A militia is generally an army or some other fighting organization of non-professional and/or part-time soldiers; citizens of a country, or subjects of a state, who may perform military service during a time of need, as opposed to a professional force of regular, full-time military personnel; or, historically, to members of a warrior-nobility class. When acting independently militias are generally unable to hold ground against regular forces; militias commonly support regular troops by skirmishing, holding fortifications, or conducting irregular warfare, instead of undertaking offensive campaigns by themselves. Local civilian laws often limit militias to serve only in their home region, and to serve only for a limited time; this further reduces their use in long military campaigns. Militias may also, however, serve as a pool of available manpower for regular forces to draw from, particularly in emergencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the United States</span> Supreme law of the United States of America

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, in 1789. Originally comprising seven articles, it delineates the national frame and constraints of government. The Constitution's first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress ; the executive, consisting of the president and subordinate officers ; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Article IV, Article V, and Article VI embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. Article VII establishes the procedure subsequently used by the 13 states to ratify it. The Constitution of the United States is the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution in force in the world today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1791 amendment protecting the right to keep and bear arms

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right to keep and bear arms. It was ratified on December 15, 1791, along with nine other articles of the Bill of Rights. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home, while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons". In McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) the Supreme Court ruled that state and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) assured the right to carry weapons in public spaces with reasonable exceptions.

In American political discourse, states' rights are political powers held for the state governments rather than the federal government according to the United States Constitution, reflecting especially the enumerated powers of Congress and the Tenth Amendment. The enumerated powers that are listed in the Constitution include exclusive federal powers, as well as concurrent powers that are shared with the states, and all of those powers are contrasted with the reserved powers—also called states' rights—that only the states possess.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Washington's Farewell Address</span> 1796 letter by George Washington to the American people

Washington's Farewell Address is a letter written by President George Washington as a valedictory to "friends and fellow-citizens" after 20 years of public service to the United States. He wrote it near the end of the second term of his presidency before retiring to his home at Mount Vernon in Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict</span> International treaty that protects cultural property during armed conflict

The Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict is the first international treaty that focuses exclusively on the protection of cultural property in armed conflict. It was signed at The Hague, Netherlands, on 14 May 1954 and entered into force on 7 August 1956. As of July 2021, it has been ratified by 133 states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civilian control of the military</span> Doctrine concerning authority over military decisions

Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in military and political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 4</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 4, titled "The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay by John Jay and the fourth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 7, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published. It is the third of four essays by Jay discussing the protection of the United States from dangerous foreign influence and military conflict. It directly continued the argument made in Federalist No. 3, and it was further continued in Federalist No. 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 5</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 5, titled "The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay by John Jay, the fifth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 10, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published. It is the last of four essays by Jay advocating political union as a means of protection from foreign nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 3</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 3, titled "The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay by John Jay, the third of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 3, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is the second of four essays by Jay on the benefits of political union in protecting Americans against foreign adversaries, preceded by Federalist No. 2 and followed by Federalist No. 4 and Federalist No. 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 16</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 16, titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union", is an essay by Alexander Hamilton. It is one of the eighty-five articles collected in the document The Federalist Papers. The entire collection of papers was written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Federalist Paper No. 16 was first published on December 4, 1787 by The New York Packet under the pseudonym Publius. According to James Madison, "the immediate object of them was to vindicate and recommend the new Constitution to the State of [New York] whose ratification of the instrument, was doubtful, as well as important". In addition, the articles were written and addressed "To the People of New York".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 29</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton "Concerning the Militia"

Federalist Paper No. 29 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twenty-ninth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on January 9, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "Concerning the Militia". Unlike the rest of the Federalist Papers, which were published more or less in order, No. 29 did not appear until after Federalist No. 36.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 41</span> Federalist Paper by James Madison

Federalist No. 41, titled "General View of the Powers Conferred by the Constitution", is an essay written by James Madison as the forty-first of The Federalist Papers. These essays were published by Alexander Hamilton, with John Jay and James Madison serving as co-authors, under the pseudonym "Publius." No. 41 was first published by The New York Packet on January 19, 1788 and argues about the necessity of the powers the Constitution vested upon the general government as well as the meaning of the phrase "general welfare".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 46</span> Federalist Paper by James Madison

Federalist No. 46 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-sixth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on January 29, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. This essay examines the relative strength of the state and federal governments under the proposed United States Constitution. It is titled "The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Militia (United States)</span> US paramilitary force

The militia of the United States, as defined by the U.S. Congress, has changed over time. During colonial America, all able-bodied men of a certain age range were members of the militia, depending on each colony's rule. Individual towns formed local independent militias for their own defense. The year before the US Constitution was ratified, The Federalist Papers detailed the founders' paramount vision of the militia in 1787. The new Constitution empowered Congress to "organize, arm, and discipline" this national military force, leaving significant control in the hands of each state government.

The results of the War of 1812, which was fought between the United Kingdom and the United States from 1812 to 1814, included no immediate boundary changes. The main result of the War of 1812 has been over two centuries of peace between the two countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist Era</span> Period in American history (1788–1800)

The Federalist Era in American history ran from 1788 to 1800, a time when the Federalist Party and its predecessors were dominant in American politics. During this period, Federalists generally controlled Congress and enjoyed the support of President George Washington and President John Adams. The era saw the creation of a new, stronger federal government under the United States Constitution, a deepening of support for nationalism, and diminished fears of tyranny by a central government. The era began with the ratification of the United States Constitution and ended with the Democratic-Republican Party's victory in the 1800 elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address</span> 1861 speech by Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address was delivered on Monday, March 4, 1861, as part of his taking of the oath of office for his first term as the sixteenth president of the United States. The speech, delivered at the United States Capitol, was primarily addressed to the people of the South and was intended to succinctly state Lincoln's intended policies and desires toward that section, where seven states had seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America.

National service in the United States has a long tradition, extending to the founding of the country. National service takes multiple forms in the U.S., including community service, military service, and other forms.

State v. Buzzard is an 1842 case determined by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in which the defendant Buzzard was charged with violating an Arkansas State law that prohibited the carrying of concealed weapons. He claimed that this law infringed upon his Constitutional right to keep and bear arms enumerated in the Second Amendment. Arkansas Trial Court struck down the state law so the state appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court. A majority held that the sole intent of the Second Amendment was for the States to have a militia to protect themselves against a national army that could infiltrate and overthrow them. In its view because of this original intent it was never meant to apply as a right granted to individuals.

References

  1. Barber, Sotirios A. "Judicial Review and" The Federalist"." The University of Chicago Law Review (1988): 836-887.
  2. Bellesiles, Michael A. "Suicide Path: New Readings of the Second Amendment." Const. Comment. 16 (1999): 247.
  3. Massaro, John. "What the Second Amendment Meant to the Founders."Soapbox Weekly, February 11 (2013).
  4. Amar, Akhil Reed. "Some New World Lessons for the Old World." The University of Chicago Law Review 58.2 (1991): 483-510.
  5. Hamilton, Alexander, et al. The federalist papers. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  6. Ketchum, Gerald W. Securing the Homeland-how should the Army fulfill its role?. ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA, 2005.