Francesca Gino

Last updated
Shu; Mazar; Gino; Ariely; Bazerman (2012). "Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient…". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 109 (38): 15197–15300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209746109 . PMC   3458378 . PMID   22927408. (Retracted, see doi:10.1073/pnas.2115397118, PMID   34518237,  Retraction Watch)
  • Gino; Kouchaki; Galinsky (2015). "The Moral Virtue of Authenticity: How Inauthenticity Produces Feelings of Immorality and Impurity". Psychological Science . 26 (7): 983–996. doi:10.1177/0956797615575277. PMID   25963614. (Retracted, see doi:10.1177/09567976231187596, PMID   37409891)
  • Gino; Wiltermuth (2014). "Evil Genius? How Dishonesty Can Lead to Greater Creativity". Psychological Science . 25 (4): 973–981. doi:10.1177/0956797614520714. PMID   24549296. (Retracted, see doi:10.1177/09567976231187595, PMID   37409890)
  • Gino; Kouchaki; Casciaro (2020). "Why Connect? Moral Consequences of Networking with a Promotion or Prevention Focus". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 119 (6): 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/pspa0000226. PMID   32551743. (Retracted, see doi:10.1037/pspa0000351, PMID   37589685)
  • The first of these papers had already been retracted due to an unrelated data issue, also uncovered by Data Colada. The other three papers were retracted in response to Harvard's investigation.

    Defamation lawsuit

    Gino subsequently filed a defamation suit against Harvard, Harvard Business School Dean Srikant Datar, and the three data investigators of Data Colada for $25 million, alleging that they had conspired to damage her reputation with false accusations and that the penalties against her amounted to gender-based discrimination under Title IX. [4] Gino denied having falsified data, and accused Harvard and the Data Colada team of having "worked together to destroy my career and reputation despite admitting they have no evidence proving their allegations." [16]

    The lawsuit raised concerns about chilling effects. Open science proponent Simine Vazire raised over $370,000 to help cover the legal fees of Data Colada. [22] [23]

    On October 10, 2023, Harvard University and Dean Datar filed a motion to partially dismiss the lawsuit, "citing the need for the University to have autonomy in its academic decision-making" (according to The Harvard Crimson ). [24] On November 8, 2023, the Data Colada defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them, contending that Gino's lawsuit does not meet the pleading standards for a viable defamation action. [25]

    As part of its motion to partially dismiss, Harvard submitted its internal 1200-page report as evidence. [20] Initially it was kept under seal, but the university as well as The New Yorker and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed motions to make it public, which were opposed by Francesca Gino's lawyers, who filed a motion to keep the report from the public. [26] In March 2024, judge Myong J. Joun ruled to unseal it (with some redactions) as a judicial record "to which there exists a presumptive right of public access." [20] In the view of Vox journalist Kelsey Piper, the unsealed document "makes the allegations of Gino’s misconduct look more warranted than ever." [27]

    On September 11, 2024, the judge dismissed all of Gino's claims against the Data Colada defendants (defamation and other claims), and dismissed Gino's defamation and certain other claims (such as violation of privacy) against the Harvard University defendants, while allowing some breach of contract claims against Harvard to continue. [28] [29] Gino has also claimed that Harvard discriminated against her on the basis of her gender. Harvard did not move for dismissal of that claim, so the litigation continues on that claim as well. [30]

    Many Co-Authors Project

    Following the revelations by Harvard and Data Colada, the Many Co-Authors Project was launched by a group of Gino's co-authors, a "mass self-auditing effort" ( The Chronicle of Higher Education ) where over 140 collaborators of Francesca Gino are trying "to collect and share information on the provenance and availability of the data for all articles co-authored by Francesca Gino." [31] [32] [19] It began publishing findings on November 6, 2023, listing 56 papers that had named Gino as having been involved in data collection, and reporting that for around 60% of these, all the co-authors who had responded reported not having access to the raw data. [31] Behavioral scientist Juliana Schroeder of UC Berkeley stated that she and other collaborators had initiated the retraction of another paper they had coauthored with Gino, citing a failure to track down data for four experiments in the paper and "unexplained issues" with two of its other datasets. [31] Gino reacted by decrying the Many Co-Authors Project for unfairly singling her out for scrutiny, and by accusing one of the involved researchers of falsely claiming that she (Gino) had collected data for one of the papers. [31]

    Allegations of plagiarism

    In April 2024, it was reported that Gino was suspected of numerous instances of plagiarism in several of her works, including her books Rebel Talent and Sidetracked, which were from a variety of sources, including several undergraduate theses (none of which were supervised by Gino), research papers and chapters by other researchers, and newspaper and magazine articles, including those by Forbes and Reactor (at the time Tor.com). Gino's lawyer denied the allegations. [5] [33]

    Books

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific misconduct</span> Violation of codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in scientific research

    Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research. It is violation of scientific integrity: violation of the scientific method and of research ethics in science, including in the design, conduct, and reporting of research.

    Sexual misconduct is misconduct of a sexual nature which exists on a spectrum that may include a broad range of sexual behaviors considered unwelcome. This includes conduct considered inappropriate on an individual or societal basis of morality, sexual harassment and/or criminal sexual assault.

    In academic publishing, a retraction is a mechanism by which a published paper in an academic journal is flagged for being seriously flawed to the extent that their results and conclusions can no longer be relied upon. Retracted articles are not removed from the published literature but marked as retracted. In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the article is clearly defamatory, violates personal privacy, is the subject of a court order, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic dishonesty</span> Any type of cheating that occurs in relation to a formal academic exercise

    Academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic fraud and academic integrity are related concepts that refer to various actions on the part of students that go against the expected norms of a school, university or other learning institution. Definitions of academic misconduct are usually outlined in institutional policies. Therefore, academic dishonesty consists of many different categories of behaviour, as opposed to being a singular concept.

    John Roland Darsee is an American physician and former medical researcher. After compiling an impressive list of publications in reputable scientific journals, he was found to have fabricated data for his publications.

    Dana–Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) is a comprehensive cancer treatment and research center in Boston, Massachusetts. Dana-Farber is the founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Harvard's Comprehensive Cancer Center designated by the National Cancer Institute, and one of the 15 clinical affiliates and research institutes of Harvard Medical School.

    Thereza Imanishi-Kari is an associate professor of pathology at Tufts University. Her research focuses on the origins of autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus, studied using mice as model organisms. Previously she had been a faculty member at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is notable for her role in what became known as the "Baltimore affair", in which a 1986 paper she co-authored with David Baltimore was the subject of research misconduct allegations. Following a series of investigations, she was fully exonerated of the charges in 1996.

    In scientific inquiry and academic research, data fabrication is the intentional misrepresentation of research results. As with other forms of scientific misconduct, it is the intent to deceive that marks fabrication as unethical, and thus different from scientists deceiving themselves. There are many ways data can be fabricated. Experimental data can be fabricated by reporting experiments that were never conducted, and accurate data can be manipulated or misrepresented to suit a desired outcome. One of the biggest problems with this form of scientific fraud is that "university investigations into research misconduct are often inadequate, opaque and poorly conducted. They challenge the idea that institutions can police themselves on research integrity."

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Marc Hauser</span> American biologist

    Marc D. Hauser is an American evolutionary biologist and a researcher in primate behavior, animal cognition and human behavior and neuroscience. Hauser was a professor of psychology at Harvard University from 1998 to 2011. In 2010 Harvard found him guilty of research misconduct, specifically fabricating and falsifying data, after which he resigned. Because Hauser's research was financed by government grants, the Office of Research Integrity of the Health and Human Services Department also investigated, finding in 2012 that Hauser had fabricated data, manipulated experimental results, and published falsified findings.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Brian Wansink</span> American consumer behavior researcher

    Brian Wansink is an American former professor and researcher who worked in consumer behavior and marketing research. He was the executive director of the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP) from 2007 to 2009 and held the John S. Dyson Endowed Chair in the Applied Economics and Management Department at Cornell University, where he directed the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Ariely</span> Israeli-American professor of psychology and behavioral economics (born 1967)

    Dan Ariely is an Israeli-American professor and author. He serves as a James B. Duke Professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University. He is the co-founder of several companies implementing insights from behavioral science. Ariely wrote an advice column called "Ask Ariely" in The Wall Street Journal from June 2012 until September 2022. He is the author of the three New York Times best selling books Predictably Irrational, The Upside of Irrationality, and The Honest Truth about Dishonesty. He co-produced the 2015 documentary (Dis)Honesty: The Truth About Lies.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Jill Lepore</span> American historian (born 1966)

    Jill Lepore is an American historian and journalist. She is the David Woods Kemper '41 Professor of American History at Harvard University and a staff writer at The New Yorker, where she has contributed since 2005. She writes about American history, law, literature, and politics.

    Paolo Macchiarini is a thoracic surgeon and former regenerative medicine researcher who became known for research fraud and manipulative behavior. He was convicted of research-related crimes in Italy and Sweden.

    Carlo Maria Croce is an Italian-American professor of medicine at Ohio State University, specializing in oncology and the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer. Croce and his research have attracted public attention because of multiple allegations of scientific misconduct.

    Haruko Obokata is a former stem-cell biologist and research unit leader at Japan's Laboratory for Cellular Reprogramming, Riken Center for Developmental Biology. She claimed in 2014 to have developed a radical and remarkably easy way to generate stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells that could be grown into tissue for use anywhere in the body. In response to allegations of irregularities in Obokata's research publications involving STAP cells, Riken launched an investigation that discovered examples of scientific misconduct on the part of Obokata. Attempts to replicate Obokata's STAP cell results failed. The ensuing STAP cell scandal gained worldwide attention.

    Annarosa Leri is a medical doctor and former associate professor at Harvard University. Along with former professor Piero Anversa, Leri was engaged in biomedical research at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School. Since at least 2003 Anversa and Leri had investigated the ability of the heart to regenerate damaged cells using cardiac stem cells.

    Uri Simonsohn is a behavioral scientist at ESADE business school in Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain, and a Senior Fellow at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. His substantive interest is in Judgment and Decision Making, and he is also a methodologist.

    Ranga P. Dias is a researcher with a primary interest in condensed matter physics. He was an assistant professor in the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Physics and Astronomy at the University of Rochester (UR), and a scientist at the UR Laboratory for Laser Energetics. As of November 19, 2024, he was no longer employed at UR.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Data Colada</span> Blog analysing and replicating behavioral academic research

    Data Colada is a blog dedicated to investigative analysis and replication of academic research, focusing in particular on the validity of findings in the social sciences.

    References

    1. 1 2 3 Scheiber, Noam (September 30, 2023). "The Harvard Professor and the Bloggers". The New York Times . Retrieved October 1, 2023.
    2. "Francesca Gino - Faculty & Research - Harvard Business School". www.hbs.edu. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
    3. 1 2 Quinn, Ryan. "Harvard Dishonesty Researcher Now on Administrative Leave". Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved 2023-07-24.
    4. 1 2 3 4 Hamid, Rahem D.; Yuan, Claire (2023-08-03). "Embattled by Data Fraud Allegations, Business School Professor Francesca Gino Files Defamation Suit Against Harvard". The Harvard Crimson . Retrieved 2023-08-03.
    5. 1 2 O'Grady, Cathleen (2024-04-09). Embattled Harvard honesty professor accused of plagiarism (Report). Science. doi:10.1126/science.zr9vcvp.
    6. "About". Francesca Gino. Retrieved 2023-08-07.
    7. Lewis-Kraus, Gideon (September 30, 2023). "They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie?". The New Yorker . Retrieved October 1, 2023.
    8. Lee, Stephanie M. (June 16, 2023). "A Weird Research-Misconduct Scandal About Dishonesty Just Got Weirder". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved June 17, 2023.
    9. "Francesca Gino Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). Retrieved 19 April 2017.
    10. "Rose-coloured spectacles?" . The Economist . 24 June 2010. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
    11. Gino, Francesca (May 2018). Rebel Talent: Why It Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life. HarperCollins. ISBN   978-0062694638.
    12. "Francesca Gino". Faculty. Harvard Business School. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
    13. "Executive Compensation at Harvard (2020)". Paddock Post. 28 September 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
    14. Scheuber, Noam (2023-06-24). "Harvard Scholar Who Studies Honesty Is Accused of Fabricating Findings". New York Times . Retrieved 21 August 2023.
    15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lewis-Kraus, Gideon (2023-09-30). "They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie?". The New Yorker . ISSN   0028-792X. Archived from the original on 2023-10-01. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    16. 1 2 Svrluga, Susan (2023-08-03). "Professor accused of faking data in studies on dishonesty sues Harvard". The Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2023-09-30. Retrieved 2023-11-04.
    17. Isaac, Benjamin (March 15, 2024). "Harvard Business School Investigation Report Recommended Firing Francesca Gino". The Harvard Crimson .
    18. 1 2 O'Grady, Cathleen (March 15, 2024). "Honesty researcher committed research misconduct, according to newly unsealed Harvard report". Science .
    19. 1 2 Nesterak, Evan (2023-08-30). "Amid Uncertainty About Francesca Gino's Research, the Many Co-Authors Project Could Provide Clarity". Behavioral Scientist. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    20. 1 2 3 Lee, Stephanie (March 14, 2024). "Here's the Unsealed Report Showing How Harvard Concluded That a Dishonesty Expert Committed Misconduct". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved March 16, 2024.
    21. Simonsohn, Uri; Simmons, Joe; Nelson, Leif (June 17, 2023). "[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake"". Data Colada . Retrieved November 2, 2023.
    22. Piper, Kelsey (2023-08-23). "A disgraced Harvard professor sued them for millions. Their recourse: GoFundMe". Vox. Archived from the original on 2023-10-31. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    23. O'Grady, Cathleen (2023-10-13). "How the reform-minded new editor of psychology's flagship journal will shake things up". science.org . Archived from the original on 2023-10-29. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    24. Parker, Adelaide E.; Song, Jennifer Y. (October 13, 2023). "Harvard Moves to Partially Dismiss $25M Lawsuit by HBS Professor Gino, Citing Autonomy Concerns". The Harvard Crimson .
    25. "Motion To Dismiss of Uri Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, And Joseph Simmons". Court Listener. Free Law Project. Retrieved 14 November 2023.
    26. Parker, Adelaide E. (2023-11-28). "Judge to Rule on Whether Claims in $25M Lawsuit by Harvard Prof. Francesca Gino Will Proceed". www.thecrimson.com. Retrieved 2024-03-16.
    27. Piper, Kelsey (2024-03-22). "A Harvard dishonesty researcher was accused of fraud. Her defense is troubling". Vox . Retrieved 2024-03-24.
    28. Lee, Stephanie M. (2024-09-11). "She Sued the Sleuths Who Found Fraud in Her Data. A Judge Just Ruled Against Her". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2024-09-12.
    29. "Memorandum of Decision" (PDF). Court Listener. Free Law Project. September 11, 2024. Retrieved 13 September 2024. Full text of decision on defendants' motions to dismiss
    30. Baek, Kyle (September 12, 2024). "Judge Dismisses Francesca Gino's Defamation Charges Against Harvard". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
    31. 1 2 3 4 Lee, Stephanie M. (2023-11-06). "Scientists Are Scrutinizing Their Work With Francesca Gino. Here's What They've Found So Far". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Archived from the original on 2023-11-07. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    32. "Main | Many Co-Authors". manycoauthors.org. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
    33. Beschizza, Rob (11 April 2024). "Ethics expert Francesca Gino, already under fire over fabricated data, accused of plagiarism". Boing Boing .

    Further reading

    Francesca Gino
    TitleProfessor of Business Administration
    Academic background
    Education