French aviso Amiral Charner

Last updated

Amiral Charner
Amiral Charner SLV Green.jpg
History
Civil and Naval Ensign of France.svgFrance
NameAmiral Charner
NamesakeAdmiral Léonard Charner
Launched7 October 1932
FateScuttled 10 March 1945
General characteristics
Type Bougainville-class aviso
Displacement
Length103.7 m (340 ft 3 in) (o/a)
Beam12.7 m (41 ft 8 in)
Draught4.15 m (13 ft 7 in)
Installed power2,191  PS (1,611  kW; 2,161  bhp)
Propulsion2 shafts; 2 diesel engines
Speed15.5 knots (28.7 km/h; 17.8 mph)
Range9,000  nmi (17,000 km; 10,000 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Complement
  • 14 officers and 121 crewmen in peacetime;
  • 166 or 183 men in wartime
Armament
Armour
  • Hull: 5–6 mm (0.20–0.24 in)
  • Deck: 5–6 mm (0.20–0.24 in)
  • Gun shields: 3 mm (0.1 in)
Aircraft carried1 × Gourdou-Leseurre GL-832 HY floatplane

Amiral Charner was one of a dozen Bougainville-class avisos built for the French Navy during the 1930s. The ships were designed to operate from French colonies in Asia and Africa. Completed in 1934, she participated in the Battle of Koh Chang in 1941 during the Franco-Thai War. The ship was scuttled in the Mỹ Tho River in French Indochina on 10 March 1945. [1]

Contents

Design and description

Model of sister ship D'Entrecasteaux at the Musee de la Marine de Paris Aviso dEntrecasteaux maquette.jpg
Model of sister ship D'Entrecasteaux at the Musée de la Marine de Paris

The Bougainville-class avisos were intended for service in the French colonial empire in austere conditions. They had an overall length of 103.7 metres (340 ft 3 in), a beam of 12.7 metres (41 ft 8 in), and a draught of 4.15 metres (13 ft 7 in). The ships displaced 1,969 tonnes (1,938 long tons ) at standard load and 2,600 tonnes (2,600 long tons) at deep load. The superstructure, decks, and the upper plating of the hull was made from armor-steel plates 5–6 millimetres (0.20–0.24 in) thick to better resist small arms and machine gun bullets. Their crew consisted of 14 officers and 121 ratings in peacetime. [2]

The Bougainville class was powered by a pair of license-built six-cylinder diesel engines, each driving one propeller shaft. Amiral Charner had Burmeister & Wain two-stroke engines rated at a total of 4,200 metric horsepower (3,089  kW ; 4,143  bhp ) for a designed speed of 15.5 knots (28.7 km/h; 17.8 mph). The ships carried enough diesel fuel to give them a range of 9,000 nautical miles (17,000 km; 10,000 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph). [3]

The Bougainville-class ships were armed with three Canon de 138.6-millimetre (5.46 in) Mle 1927 guns in single mounts, one superfiring pair forward of the superstructure and the third gun atop the aft superstructure. They were protected by 3 mm-thick (0.12 in) gun shields. The ships were fitted with a 3-metre (9 ft 10 in) Mle 1932 coincidence rangefinder on the roof of the bridge that fed data to the type aviso mechanical fire-control computer. [4] The anti-aircraft armament of the Bougainville class consisted of four 50-caliber Canon de 37 mm (1.5 in) Mle 1925 AA guns in single mounts. [5] Short-range protection against strafing aircraft was provided by eight Mitrailleuse de 8 mm (0.3 in) Mle 1914 in four twin mountings. The ships were fitted with mine rails, one set on each side of the aft superstructure to allow them to lay defensive minefields. They could carry 50 Breguet B4 mines or a smaller number of larger Harlé H4 mines. They were also fitted with four minesweeping paravanes on the quarterdeck. The minerails could also be used to drop depth charges over the stern via trolleys; a total of 16 depth charges could be loaded on the rails. [6]

Between the mainmast and the aft funnel, space was reserved for a reconnaissance seaplane, either a Gourdou-Leseurre GL-832 HY floatplane or a Potez 452 flying boat. The aircraft was lifted onto the water and recovered back on board by a derrick attached to the mainmast. [7]

References

  1. Jordan 2016, pp. 22, 24.
  2. Jordan 2016, pp. 9–10, 14.
  3. Jordan 2016, pp. 10, 15.
  4. Jordan 2016, pp. 10–11, 17.
  5. Roberts 1980, p. 276.
  6. Jordan 2016, pp. 10–11, 16–18.
  7. Jordan 2016, pp. 18–19.

Bibliography