Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University

Last updated
Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.svg
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Full case nameGay Student Services, J.M. Minton, Keith Stewart and Patricia Wooldridge, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Texas A&M University, et al., Defendants-Appellees
DecidedAugust 3, 1984
Docket nos.82-2366
Citation(s)737 F.2d 1317
Case history
Prior history612 F.2d 160 (5th. Cir. Feb. 20, 1980)
Subsequent historyPetition for certiorari denied, 471 U.S. 1001 (1985)
635 F. Supp. 776 (N.D. Tex. 1986)
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting John Robert Brown, Thomas Morrow Reavley, Jerre Stockton Williams
Case opinions
MajorityBrown, joined by Reavley, Williams
Laws applied
First Amendment

Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University, 737 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir. 1984) [1] is a court case in which the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the First Amendment required public universities to recognize student organizations aimed at gay students. In 1976, Texas A&M University denied official recognition to the Gay Student Services Organization on the grounds that homosexuality was illegal in Texas, and the group's stated goals—offering referral services and providing educational information to students—were actually the responsibility of university staff. The students sued the university for violation of their First Amendment right to freedom of speech in February 1977. For six years, the case wound its way through the courts; although the trial court ruled in favor of Texas A&M several times, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly overturned the verdict. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take the case, letting stand the circuit court ruling that the students' free speech rights had been compromised.

Contents

Background

When Texas A&M University opened in 1876, only male students were admitted. All students were required to join the Corps of Cadets and receive military training. [2] Although the school was located in a sparsely populated area, student social clubs and fraternities were discouraged. [3] After World War II ended, enrollment at A&M skyrocketed as many former soldiers used the G.I. Bill to further their education. [4]

When in the 1950s editorials in the school newspaper, The Battalion , encouraged coeducation, the Student Senate demanded that the editor of the paper resign. Later in the year students defeated 2–1 a campus resolution on coeducation. [5] Texas A&M finally became coeducational in 1963; female students were forbidden from joining the Corps of Cadets. [6] The following year, the college was officially integrated, and in 1965 membership in the Corps of Cadets became voluntary. [7] By 1970, enrollment had grown to more than 14,000 students from all 50 states and 75 nations. [6]

Precursor

In the spring semester of 1976, a group of Texas A&M students organized a gay support group. In an effort to advertise their new organization, they began posting flyers around the Texas A&M campus during the evenings. During one of these evenings, two of them were confronted at knifepoint by two other students, and forced to take all their flyers down. After that incident, they decided to get formal permission to post flyers.

In April of that year, three students identified in the court papers as M. Minton, M. Garrett, and S. Skinner (later determined to be Michael Minton, Michael Garrett, and Sherri Skinner) approached John Koldus, the Texas A&M Vice President for Student Affairs, and requested limited recognition for an organization to support gay issues. The students did not want full university recognition, which included partial funding from student fees as well as official office space in the Student Programs Office, because several of their members wished to be discreet about their sexual orientation. Instead, the group requested only meeting space on campus and the right to post notices on school bulletin boards and in the student newspaper. [8] Koldus informed the students that the university did not offer limited recognition, and that to gain the access they had asked for the students must apply for fully official status. [9]

The Director of Student Affairs, Carolyn Adair, advised the students to describe themselves as a service group rather than a political or social organization. Therefore, their application listed the group's goals as: creating a referral service for students advising professional counseling in several fields, providing information and education on life as a homosexual student, and sponsoring external speakers to discuss gay issues. [9]

For the next six months, the application lingered unresolved, although as early as May a university memo – unseen by the students – emphatically stated that the university would not recognize the organization unless ordered to do so. [9] On November 29, the application was officially denied on two grounds. The initial reason was that homosexual conduct was illegal in Texas. [9] Furthermore, the university maintained that university staff held sole responsibility for offering referral services, educational information, and speakers. As a result, the university ruled that the student organization's mission was not "consistent with the philosophy and goals" of the university. [10]

Court proceedings

Partial view of GSS flyer detailing case and explaining purpose GSS Flyer Sections.jpg
Partial view of GSS flyer detailing case and explaining purpose

District Court

The students sued the university in February 1977 for infringing their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The case was initially dismissed by a trial court with no comment. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case for trial. [11] A bench trial, held in November 1981, was decided in favor of Texas A&M.

Court of Appeals

On August 3, 1984, the district decision was overturned by the appellate court. [1] The appellate court ruled that, despite the mission listed in their application, the Gay Student Services group was primarily a social organization. The appellate court found that Texas A&M "did not and has not to the time of trial in this case, recognized fraternal organizations, i.e. student groups whose principal if not sole purpose is to hold social gatherings to encourage friendships and personal affinity", and that this was the primary reason for the refusal to grant official status. [12] Although trial testimony had centered on other issues, the appellate court ruling hinted that the outcome might have been different if Texas A&M had argued that the denial was a result of public health concerns. This decision was rendered before there was much public awareness of AIDS. [13]

Subsequent Actions

Following this ruling, the state of Texas refused to further represent the university. Texas A&M officials instead hired a private lawyer, and appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court. [14] In their brief, Texas A&M officials changed tactics. They now argued that recognizing the Gay Student Services organization would encourage more homosexual conduct, thus leading to increased psychological and physical problems. [15] The brief further alleged that the appellate court ruling had "created for homosexuals a right not specifically enumerated in the Constitution." [16] In response, the students argued that the university's appeal was "predicated largely on the mistaken belief that mere official recognition of a student service organization that has been meeting unofficially since 1976 will cause a significant increase in homosexual activity. This belief is completely unfounded." [17]

Appeal to the Supreme Court

By this time, several other federal courts had also ruled that LGBT student organizations had a right to form under the First Amendment. [18] The Supreme Court denied certiorari, letting stand the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that ordered the school to recognize the student organization. [19]

Campus activism

GSS president Marco Roberts and David Kerr at the MDA Kissathon staged in Kyle Field in 1985. Converse photo in Aggie 1985 Yearbook. Kyle Field Kissathon 1985.jpg
GSS president Marco Roberts and David Kerr at the MDA Kissathon staged in Kyle Field in 1985. Converse photo in Aggie 1985 Yearbook.

During the period that began with the Fifth Circuit Court decision of August 3, 1984, ruling that Texas A&M acted improperly when it refused to recognize Gay Student Services, and then ended with the Supreme Court decision on April 1, 1985, not to hear Texas A&M's appeal, campus daily life and political activism was highly and tensely focused on the question of whether GSS (often mistakenly referred to as GSSO) should be allowed on campus. During those eight months, the university's student council voted on a resolution in favor of GSS recognition, after an address to the council by the GSS President Marco Roberts, creating a furor among the student population; [20] hundreds of articles, columns, and letters to the editor appeared in the school's paper and the city newspaper regarding the controversial issue; dozens of news reports appeared on local and national news programs.; [21] multiple formal debate forums on the issue were held on campus, with GSS leaders invited to participate; two major on-campus protest rallies were led by the leaders of GSS (at the invitation of a recognized student group called Students Working Against Many Problems, or SWAMP) which were attended and counter-protested by hundreds of students; [22] and lastly, Marco Roberts and David Kerr (president of the gay student group at Trinity University) joined 1,400 couples at the MDA Kissathon held at Kyle field during the spring semester of 1985, surrounded by a curtain of SWAMP couples. [23]

In a matter of coincidence, the last on-campus rally hosted by SWAMP to provide GSS leaders the opportunity to speak and distribute literature occurred on April 1, 1985, the same day the Supreme Court rendered its decision that let the Fifth Circuit Court ruling stand, effectively ending the legal battle in GSS's favor. [24]

Legacy

The case set a national precedent by removing all legal restrictions against gay rights groups on campuses. [18] The subsequent recognition of the group provided a university precedent for allowing social organizations. [25] In 1977, the university had also denied recognition to Sigma Phi Epsilon, a national social fraternity, because its presence on campus might result in "a social caste system". [12] On March 31 and April 1, 2010, through the efforts of the GLBT Resource Center, the GLBT Professional Network and the Queer Studies Working Group at Texas A&M, and with funding from many campus bodies including the President's Office, the university celebrated the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court's inaction with a well-attended two-day symposium, "25 Years After," that featured an exploration of "Queer of Color" the first day and "GLBT in Higher Education" on the second, featuring a keynote speech by the openly gay president of Roosevelt University, Charles R. Middleton. [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that most sanctions of criminal punishment for consensual, adult non-procreative sexual activity are unconstitutional. The Court reaffirmed the concept of a "right to privacy" that earlier cases had found the U.S. Constitution provides, even though it is not explicitly enumerated. It based its ruling on the notions of personal autonomy to define one's own relationships and of American traditions of non-interference with private sexual decisions between consenting adults.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1985.

Kentucky v. Wasson, 842 S.W.2d 487, was a 1992 Kentucky Supreme Court decision striking down the state's anti sodomy laws that criminalized sexual activity between two people of the same-sex, holding that this was a violation of both the equal protection of the laws and the right to privacy. The Kentucky case helped pave the way for many other states and eventually the United States Supreme Court to issue similar rulings.

Richard John Baker v. Gerald R. Nelson, 291 Minn. 310, 191 N.W.2d 185 (1971), was a case in which the Minnesota Supreme Court decided that construing a marriage statute to restrict marriage licenses to persons of the opposite sex "does not offend" the U.S. Constitution. Baker appealed the decision, and on October 10, 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the appeal "for want of a substantial federal question".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diane Wood</span> American judge

Diane Pamela Wood is an American attorney who serves as the director of the American Law Institute, a senior circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Texas A&M University</span> History of an American university

The history of Texas A&M University, the first public institution of higher education in Texas, began in 1871, when the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas was established as a land-grant college by the Reconstruction-era Texas Legislature. Classes began on October 4, 1876. Although Texas A&M was originally scheduled to be established under the Texas Constitution as a branch of the yet-to-be-created University of Texas, subsequent acts of the Texas Legislature never gave the university any authority over Texas A&M. In 1875, the Legislature separated the administrations of A&M and the University of Texas, which still existed only on paper.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael McConnell and Jack Baker</span> Pioneering advocates of marriage rights for gay couples

James Michael McConnell and Richard John "Jack" Baker are the first same-sex couple to be married legally with a license that was never revoked. Their wedding became the earliest same-sex marriage ever to be recorded in the public files of any civil government.

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that public universities may subsidize campus groups by means of a mandatory student activity fee without violating the students' First Amendment rights.

Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld, against a First Amendment challenge, the policy of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, governing official recognition of student groups, which required the groups to accept all students regardless of their status or beliefs in order to obtain recognition.

<i>Baker v. Wade</i> U.S. court case on sodomy

Baker v. Wade 563 F.Supp 1121, rev'd 769 F.2nd 289 cert denied 478 US 1022 (1986) is a federal lawsuit challenging the legality of the sodomy law of the state of Texas. Plaintiff Donald Baker contended that the law violated his rights to privacy and equal protection. After a victory at trial, an appellate court reversed the lower court's decision and in the wake of its decision in Bowers v. Hardwick the Supreme Court of the United States refused to review it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ Aggies</span> Student group at Texas A&M University

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Aggies is an officially recognized student group at Texas A&M University. Originally known as Gay Student Services (GSS) and later as Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Aggies, the organization was officially recognized by Texas A&M University in 1985 after a lengthy court battle.

The state of Texas, located in the south in the United States, contains a large community of LGBTQ+ citizens. More specifically, the city Austin, Texas has the third largest population of LGBTQ+ people based on the size of the city. Austin, Texas, and Texas in general, is home to several icons of the LGBTQ+ community such as Karamo Brown, co-founder of the LGBTQ+ group "Queer Eye" and Demi Lovato, a queer artist and activist. There is history of heavy violence against the LGBTQ+ community within Texas such as riots, as well as liberation and parades celebrating those within the community.

<i>National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education</i> United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit case

National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education of the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 729 F.2d 1270, is a decision by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that upheld in part, and struck down in part, a law allowing schools to fire teachers for public homosexual conduct. It was the first federal appellate court decision to deny that sexual orientation is a suspect classification. It was affirmed by an equally divided vote in the United States Supreme Court.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of gay men in the United States</span>

This article addresses the history of gay men in the United States. Unless otherwise noted, the members of same-sex male couples discussed here are not known to be gay, but they are mentioned as part of discussing the practice of male homosexuality—that is, same-sex male sexual and romantic behavior.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2014.

In the United States, the history of same-sex marriage dates from the early 1940s, when the first lawsuits seeking legal recognition of same-sex relationships brought the question of civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples to public attention though they proved unsuccessful. However marriage wasn't a request for the LGBTQ movement until the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington (1987). The subject became increasingly prominent in U.S. politics following the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Miike that suggested the possibility that the state's prohibition might be unconstitutional. That decision was met by actions at both the federal and state level to restrict marriage to male-female couples, notably the enactment at the federal level of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Gay Alliance of Students v. Matthews, 544 F.2d 162 (1976) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit case in which a student at Virginia Commonwealth University sued Alfred T. Matthews, Dean of Student Life and Wyndham B. Blanton, Jr., member of Board of Visitors for recognition and access to university resources as a student organization. Upon application, VCU rejected a group of students' request to practice as an official student group at the university on the basis of the groups advocacy for gay rights and liberation. Two years after the rejection, the 4th District ruled for VCU to reverse their decision and grant the Gay Alliance of Students (GAS) the same rights as registered student organizations at the university are granted.

References

  1. 1 2 Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University, 737F.2d1317 (5th Cir.1984).
  2. ↑ Dethloff, Henry C. (1975). A Pictorial History of Texas A&M University, 1876–1976. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press. pp. 16–17.
  3. ↑ Dethloff (1975), pp 21–22.
  4. ↑ Gillentine, Kristy (March 11, 2007), "Aggies recall days at Annex", The Bryan-College Station Eagle, archived from the original on May 30, 2011, retrieved October 28, 2009
  5. ↑ Kavanagh, Colleen (2001), "Questioning Tradition", The Bryan-College Station Eagle, archived from the original on 2004-12-26, retrieved 2008-06-24
  6. 1 2 Ferrell, Christopher (2001), "Rudder's influence is evident on campus", The Bryan-College Station Eagle, archived from the original on 2007-10-16, retrieved 2008-06-24
  7. ↑ Charleton, Gene (1998-01-19). "First African-American Vet Grad Honored As Outstanding Alumnus". Texas A&M University Office of University Relations. Archived from the original on 2009-07-27. Retrieved 2008-06-24.
  8. ↑ Pinello (2003), p. 57.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Pinello (2003), p. 58.
  10. ↑ Pinello (2003), p. 59.
  11. ↑ Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University, 612F.2d160 (5th Cir.1980).
  12. 1 2 quoted in Pinello (2003), p. 59.
  13. ↑ O'Neil (1997), p. 106.
  14. ↑ Greenhouse, Linda (April 2, 1985), "Supreme Court Roundup; Case of Ministry Student is Accepted", The New York Times, retrieved October 28, 2009
  15. ↑ Pinello (2003), p. 62.
  16. ↑ quoted in Wiessler, Judy (April 1, 1985), "A&M loses 9-year battle in gay case", Houston Chronicle, p. Section 1, page 1, retrieved October 28, 2009
  17. ↑ quoted in Wiessler, Judy (April 2, 1985), "Texas A&M loses legal fight against gay student group", Houston Chronicle, p. Section 1, page 1, retrieved October 28, 2009
  18. 1 2 Wiessler, Judy (April 2, 1985), "Texas A&M loses legal fight against gay student group", Houston Chronicle, p. Section 1, page 1, retrieved October 28, 2009
  19. ↑ Wiessler, Judy (April 1, 1985), "A&M loses 9-year battle in gay case", Houston Chronicle, p. Section 1, page 1, retrieved October 28, 2009
  20. ↑ The Battalion, October 19, 23, & 25, 1984.
  21. ↑ "Gay Student Services at Texas A&M" . Retrieved 2010-04-26.
  22. ↑ Bryan Eagle, October 20, 1984, p. 1
  23. ↑ The Aggie Year Book, 1985, photo.
  24. ↑ The Battalion, April 2, 1985, p.1.
  25. ↑ Grosgebauer, Amanda, "GLBT Aggies recognize court-battled founding", The Battalion, College Station, TX, retrieved October 28, 2009[ permanent dead link ]
  26. ↑ "It's Time - Commemorating 25 years of GLBT Recognition at Texas A&M University". studentlife.tamu.edu. Archived from the original on 2010-03-18. Retrieved 2010-10-17.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.