Gender digital divide

Last updated

Gender digital divide is defined as gender biases coded into technology products, technology sector, and digital skills education. [1] [2] It can refer to women's lack of access to, use of, and professional development in computing work. The gender digital divide has changed throughout history due to social roles, economics, and educational opportunities.

Contents

Background

Education systems are increasingly trying to ensure equitable, inclusive, and high-quality digital skills, education, and training. Though digital skills open pathways to further learning and skills development, women and girls are still being left behind in digital skills education. Globally, digital skills gender gaps are growing, despite at least a decade of national and international efforts to close them. [1] The economic and political interests of its indicators have also been questioned. [3]

Digital skills gap

Women are less likely to know how to operate a smartphone, navigate the internet, use social media and understand how to safeguard information in digital mediums (abilities that underlie life and work tasks and are relevant to people of all ages) worldwide. There is a gap from the lowest skill proficiency levels, such as using apps on a mobile phone, to the most advanced skills like coding computer software to support the analysis of large data sets. [1]

Women in numerous countries are 25% less likely than men to know how to leverage ICT for basic purposes, such as using simple arithmetic formulas in a spreadsheet. [4] UNESCO estimates that men are around four times more likely than women to have advanced ICT skills such as the ability to programme computers. [1] Across G20 countries 7% of ICT patents are generated by women, [5] and the global average is at 2%. [6] Recruiters for technology companies in Silicon Valley estimate that the applicant pool for technical jobs in artificial intelligence (AI) and data science is often less than 1% female. [7] To highlight this difference, in 2009 there were 2.5 million college-educated women working in STEM compared to 6.7 million men. The total workforce at the time was 49% women and 51% men which highlights the evident gap. [8]

While the gender gap in digital skills is evident across regional boundaries and income levels, it is more severe for women who are older, less educated, poor, or living in rural areas and developing countries. Making women much less likely to graduate in any field of STEM compared to their male counterpart. [9] Digital skills gap intersects with issues of poverty and educational access. [1]

Root causes

Women and girls may struggle to access public ICT facilities due to unsafe roads, limits on their freedom of movement, or because the facilities themselves are considered unsuitable for women. [1]

Women may not have the financial independence needed to purchase digital technology or pay for internet connectivity. Digital access, even when available, may be controlled and monitored by men or limited to 'walled gardens' containing a limited selection of content, known as 'pink content' focused on women's appearances, dating, or their roles as wives or mothers. [10] Fears concerning safety and harassment (both online and offline) also inhibit many women and girls from benefiting from or even wanting to use ICTs. [11]

In many contexts, women and girls face concerns of physical violence if they own or borrow digital devices, which in some cases leads to their using the devices in secret, making them more vulnerable to online threats and making it difficult to gain digital skills. [12]

The stereotype of technology as a male domain is common in many contexts and affect girls' confidence in their digital skills from a young age. In OECD countries, 0.5% of girls aspire towards ICT-related careers at age 15, versus 5% of boys. [13] This was not always the case. Early decades of computing saw a much larger presence of women. Acting as programmers during World War II, they held highly valued positions. [14] Women's contributions, however, have been largely obscured due to how the history is told. Focusing on the infrastructure and hardware of digital technologies development has placed men at the forefront of its history. [15] Post war computer manufacturers sought to commercialize the machines and opened up a new form of labor market. This post war market utilized discriminatory criteria measures that women were no longer able to meet due to societal, educational, and labor expectations. [14] Managers of early technology firms allowed women well-suited for programming because of stereotypes characterizing them as meticulous and good at following step-by-step directions. Women, including many women of color, flocked to jobs in the computer industry because it was seen as more meritocratic than other fields. [16] As computers became integrated into people's daily life, it was noticed that programmers had influence. Consequently, women were pushed out and the field became more male-dominated. [1]

Access divide versus skills divide

Due to the declining price of connectivity and hardware, skills deficits have exceeded barriers of access as the primary contributor to the gender digital divide. For years, the divide was assumed to be symptomatic of technical challenges. It was thought that women would catch up with men when the world had cheaper devices and lower connectivity prices, due to the limited purchasing power and financial independence of women compared with men. [1] The cost of ICT access remains an issue and is surpassed by educational gaps. For example, the gender gap in internet penetration is around 17% in the Arab States and the Asia and Pacific region, [17] whereas the gender gap in ICT skills is as high as 25% in some Asian and Middle Eastern countries. [18] In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the Internet penetration rate in 2019 was 33.8 percent for men and 22.6 percent for women. The Internet user gender gap was 20.7 percent in 2013 and up to 37 percent in 2019. [19] [20] The Internet penetration rate in 2019 was 33.8 percent for men and 22.6 percent for women. [21] [20]

SSA has one of the widest mobile gender gaps in the world where over 74 million women are not connected. [20] The gender gap in mobile ownership was 13 percent, a reduction from 14 percent in 2018; however, in low- and middle-income countries it remains substantial with fewer women than men accessing the Internet on a mobile device. [20] Furthermore, women are less likely to use digital services or mobile Internet and tend to use different mobile services than men. [22] [20]

Many people have access to affordable devices and broadband networks, but do not have the requisite skills to take advantage of this technology to improve their lives. [1] In Brazil, lack of skills (rather than cost of access) was found to be the primary reason low-income groups are not using the internet. [23] In India, where lack of skills and lack of need for the internet were the primary limiting factors across all income groups.

Lack of understanding, interest or time is a bigger issue than affordability or availability as the reason for not using the internet. [1] Even though skills deficits prevent both men and women from using digital technologies, they tend to be more severe for women. In a study conducted across 10 low- and middle-income countries, women were 1.6 times more likely than men to report lack of skills as a barrier to internet use. [24] Women are also more likely to report that they do not see a reason to access and use ICT. [25] Interest and perception of need are related to skills, as people who have little experience with or understanding of ICTs tend to underestimate their benefits and utility. [1]

Relationship between digital skills and gender equality

In many societies, gender equality does not translate into digital realms and professions. The persistence of growing digital skills gender gaps, even in countries that rank at the top of the World Economic Forum's global gender gap index (reflecting strong gender equality), demonstrates a need for interventions that cultivate the digital skills of women and girls. [1]

For most countries, the primary barriers for women regarding access to digital technology are cost/unaffordability followed by illiteracy and lack of digital skills. For instance, in Africa 65.4 percent of people aged 15 and older are illiterate, compared to the global average rate of 86.4 percent. [26] [20]

Gender digital divide and COVID-19

Africa

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken by governments on social distancing and mobility restrictions have contributed to boosting the use of digital technology to bridge some of the physical access gaps. [20] However, the rapid proliferation of digital tools and services stands in stark contrast to the many systemic and structural barriers to technology access and adoption that many people in rural Africa still face. [20] Gender inequalities, intersecting with and compounded by other social differences such as class, race, age, (dis)ability, etc., shape the extent to which different rural women and men are able not only to access but also use and benefit from these new technologies and ways of delivering information and services. [20]

Beside the potential of digital tools and applications, the COVID-19 crisis has evidenced the existing digital divide and especially the gender gap. [20] It is estimated that 3.6 billion individuals are not connected to the Internet across the globe, including 900 million in Africa. [20] Only 27 percent of women in Africa have access to the Internet and only 15 percent of them can afford to use it. [27] [20]

Gender-responsive digitalization in COVID-19 response

According to a study by FAO, gender-responsive digitalization in COVID-19 response and beyond could include: [20]

  • Improve the availability of sex-disaggregated data and gender-related statistics that capture digital gender gaps in rural areas to better inform policy and business decisions
  • Promote an enabling environment that includes gender-responsive policies, strategies and initiatives
  • Leverage digital solutions to deliver COVID-19 relief measures targeted to rural women and girls and facilitate their access to social protection services and alternative income-generation opportunities.
  • Dedicate funds for digital acceleration to support women-led enterprises.
  • Improve the national broadband coverage to ensure affordable, accessible and reliable infrastructure for inclusive digital transformation
  • Invest in the protection of Internet users, especially illiterate and vulnerable ones, against frauds and abuses as cybercrime, including sexual harassment. According to UN Women, these crimes have reportedly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially toward women and girls. [28] [20]

Benefits of digital empowerment

Helping women and girls develop digital skills means stronger women, stronger families, stronger communities, stronger economies and better technology. [1] Digital skills are recognized to be essential life skills required for full participation in society. The main benefits for acquiring digital skills are they: [1]

Digitalization can potentially pave the way for improving the efficiency and functioning of food systems, which in turn can have positive impacts on the livelihoods of women and men farmers and agripreneurs, for example, through the creation of digital job opportunities for young women and men in rural areas. [20]

Closing the digital skills gender gap

Guidelines for Digital Inclusion Guidelines for Digital Inclusion.svg
Guidelines for Digital Inclusion

[29] The digital divide has begun at earlier ages as young adults have lived out their childhoods with personal computers. This has made intervention to prevent further gender divides in the digital realm needed in more early education. Increasing girls' and women's digital skills involves early, varied and sustained exposure to digital technologies. [30] Interventions should not be limited to formal education settings, they should reflect a multifaceted approach, enabling women and girls to acquire skills in a variety of formal and informal contexts (at home, in school, in their communities and in the workplace). [1] The digital divide cuts across age groups, therefore solutions need to assume a lifelong learning orientation. The technological changes adds impetus to the 'across life' perspective, as skills learned today will not necessarily be relevant in 5 or 10 years. Digital skills require regular updating, to prevent women and girls fall further behind. [1]

Women and girls digital skills development are strengthened by: [1]

  1. Adopting sustained, varied and life-wide approaches;
  1. Establishing incentives, targets and quotas;
  2. Embedding ICT in formal education;
  3. Supporting engaging experiences;
  4. Emphasising meaningful use and tangible benefits;
  5. Encouraging collaborative and peer learning;
  6. Creating safe spaces and meet women where they are;
  7. Examining exclusionary practices and language;
  8. Recruiting and training gender-sensitive teachers;
  9. Promoting role models and mentors;
  10. Bringing parents on board;
  11. Leveraging community connections and recruiting allies;
  12. Supporting technology autonomy and women's digital rights. [1]

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), there are seven success factors to empowering rural women through ICTs: [20]

The regulatory role of governments (at local, national, regional, and international levels) is crucial in addressing infrastructural barriers, harmonizing and making the regulatory environment inclusive and gender-responsive, and in protecting all stakeholders from fraud and crime. [20]

Initiatives targeted at boosting women's representation in the technology industry are essential to closing the digital skills gender divide. Mentorship programs, networking chances, and scholarships for women seeking jobs in technology are examples of such initiatives. These efforts can help create more inclusive workplaces that respect diversity and promote creativity by boosting the presence of women in the technology industry. [31]

Overall, initiatives targeted at boosting women's representation in the technology industry are essential to closing the digital skills gender divide. We can build more inclusive and innovative environments that help everyone if we assist women in technology.

Female gendering of AI technologies

Men continue to dominate the technology space, and the disparity serves to perpetuate gender inequalities, as unrecognized bias is replicated and built into algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI). [1]

Limited participation of women and girls in the technology sector can stem outward replicating existing gender biases and creating new ones. Women's participation in the technology sector is constrained by unequal digital skills education and training. Learning and confidence gaps that arise as early as primary school amplify as girls move through education, therefore by the time they reach higher education only a fraction pursue advanced-level studies in computer science and related information and communication technology (ICT) fields. [30] Divides grow greater in the transition from education to work. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that only 6% of professional software developers are women. [35]

Technologies generated by male-dominated teams and companies often reflect gender biases. Establishing balance between men and women in the technology sector will help lay foundations for the creation of technology products that better reflect and ultimately accommodate the rich diversity of human societies. [1] For instance AI, which is a branch of the technology sector that wields influence over people's lives. [1] Today, AI curates information shown by internet search engines, determines medical treatments, makes loan decisions, ranks job applications, translates languages, places ads, recommends prison sentences, influences parole decisions, calibrates lobbying and campaigning efforts, intuits tastes and preferences, and decides who qualifies for insurance, among other tasks. Despite the growing influence of this technology, women make up just 12% of AI researchers. [35] Closing the gender divide begins with establishing more inclusive and gender-equal digital skills education and training. [1]

Digital assistants

Digital assistants encompass a range of internet-connected technologies that support users in various ways. When interacting with digital assistants, users are not restricted to a narrow range of input commands, but are encouraged to make queries using whichever inputs seem most appropriate or natural, whether they are typed or spoken. Digital assistants seek to enable and sustain more human-like interactions with technology. Digital assistants can include: voice assistants, chatbots, and virtual agents. [1]

Feminization of voice assistants

Voice assistants have become central to technology platforms and, in many countries, to day-to-day life. Between 2008 and 2018, the frequency of voice-based internet search queries increased 35 times and account for close to one fifth of mobile internet searches (a figure that is projected to increase to 50% by 2020). [36] Voice assistants now manage upwards of 1 billion tasks per month, from the mundane (changing a song) to the essential (contacting emergency services). [37]

Today, most leading voice assistants are exclusively female or female by default, both in name and in sound of voice. Amazon has Alexa (named for the ancient library in Alexandria), [38] Microsoft has Cortana (named for a synthetic intelligence in the video game Halo that projects itself as a sensuous unclothed woman), [39] and Apple has Siri (coined by the Norwegian co-creator of the iPhone 4S and meaning 'beautiful woman who leads you to victory' in Norse). [40] While Google's voice assistant is simply Google Assistant and sometimes referred to as Google Home, its voice is female.

The trend to feminize assistants occurs in a context in which there is a growing gender imbalance in technology companies, such that men commonly represent two thirds to three quarters of a firm's total workforce. [17] Companies like Amazon and Apple have cited academic work demonstrating that people prefer a female voice to a male voice, justifying the decision to make voice assistants female. Further research shows that consumers strongly dislike voice assistants without clear gender markers. [41] Gender bias is thus "hard-coded" into technology. Companies often cite research showing that customers want their digital assistants to sound like women, justifying the choice with the profit motive. [1] However, research on the topic is mixed, with studies showing that in some contexts male choices may be preferred. [1] For example, BMW was forced to recall a female-voiced navigation system on its 5 Series cars in the late 1990s after being flooded with calls from German men who reportedly "refused to take directions from a woman". [42]

Researchers who specialize in human–computer interaction have recognized that both men and women tend to characterize female voices as more helpful. The perception may have roots in traditional social norms around women as nurturers (mothers often take on – willingly or not – significantly more care than fathers) and other socially constructed gender biases that predate the digital era. [1]

See also

Sources

Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0( license statement/permission ). Text taken from Gender-responsive digitalization: A critical component of the COVID-19 response in Africa​ , FAO, FAO.

Related Research Articles

The digital divide is the unequal access to digital technology, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and the internet. The digital divide creates a division and inequality around access to information and resources. In the Information Age in which information and communication technologies (ICTs) have eclipsed manufacturing technologies as the basis for world economies and social connectivity, people without access to the Internet and other ICTs are at a socio-economic disadvantage, for they are unable or less able to find and apply for jobs, shop and learn.

The global digital divide describes global disparities, primarily between developed and developing countries, in regards to access to computing and information resources such as the Internet and the opportunities derived from such access.

Information and communications technology (ICT) is an extensional term for information technology (IT) that stresses the role of unified communications and the integration of telecommunications and computers, as well as necessary enterprise software, middleware, storage and audiovisual, that enable users to access, store, transmit, understand and manipulate information.

The knowledge divide is the gap between those who can find, create, manage, process, and disseminate information or knowledge, and those who are impaired in this process. According to a 2005 UNESCO World Report, the rise in the 21st century of a global information society has resulted in the emergence of knowledge as a valuable resource, increasingly determining who has access to power and profit. The rapid dissemination of information on a potentially global scale as a result of new information media and the globally uneven ability to assimilate knowledge and information has resulted in potentially expanding gaps in knowledge between individuals and nations. The digital divide is an extension of the knowledge divide, dividing people who have access to the internet and those who do not. The knowledge divide also represents the inequalities of knowledge among different identities, including but not limited to race, economic status, and gender.

Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the use of information and communications technologies (ICTs) in China. As the largest developing country in the world, China faces a severe digital divide, which exists not only between mainland China and the developed countries, but also among its own regions and social groups.

The digital divide in the United States refers to inequalities between individuals, households, and other groups of different demographic and socioeconomic levels in access to information and communication technologies ("ICTs") and in the knowledge and skills needed to effectively use the information gained from connecting.

The digital divide is described as the characterisation of the gap between individuals or countries that have access to information and communications technologies, primarily telecommunications and the Internet, and individuals or countries that do not. This also includes, but is not limited to: access to computers, broadband, information literacy and digital skills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in STEM fields</span> Female participants in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Many scholars and policymakers have noted that the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have remained predominantly male with historically low participation among women since the origins of these fields in the 18th century during the Age of Enlightenment.

A knowledge society generates, shares, and makes available to all members of the society knowledge that may be used to improve the human condition. A knowledge society differs from an information society in that the former serves to transform information into resources that allow society to take effective action, while the latter only creates and disseminates the raw data. The capacity to gather and analyze information has existed throughout human history. However, the idea of the present-day knowledge society is based on the vast increase in data creation and information dissemination that results from the innovation of information technologies. The UNESCO World Report addresses the definition, content and future of knowledge societies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's empowerment</span> Giving rights, freedom to make decisions and strengthening women to stand on their own

Women's empowerment may be defined in several ways, including accepting women's viewpoints, making an effort to seek them and raising the status of women through education, awareness, literacy, and training. Women's empowerment equips and allows women to make life-determining decisions through the different societal problems. They may have the opportunity to re-define gender roles or other such roles, which allow them more freedom to pursue desired goals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender disparity in computing</span> Imbalance

Gender disparity in computing concerns the disparity between the number of men in the field of computing in relation to the lack of women in the field. Originally, computing was seen as a female occupation. As the field evolved, so too did the demographics, and the gender gap shifted from female dominated to male dominated. The believed need for more diversity and an equal gender gap has led to public policy debates regarding gender equality. Many organizations have sought to create initiatives to bring more women into the field of computing.

Educational technology in sub-Saharan Africa refers to the promotion, development and use of information and communication technologies (ICT), m-learning, media, and other technological tools to improve aspects of education in sub-Saharan Africa. Since the 1960s, various information and communication technologies have aroused strong interest in sub-Saharan Africa as a way of increasing access to education, and enhancing its quality and fairness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital divide in Nigeria</span> Internet divide for communication technology

The digital divide is a term used to describe the disadvantage in access to information which people without access to ICT suffer. Nigeria's digital divide refers to the inequality of Nigerian individuals, groups, or organizations with regard to access to Information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure or to the internet for daily activities. The digital divide has been attributed to many factors among which is the high cost of computer equipment, lack of ICT skill and poor knowledge of available search engines. Lack of access to ICT makes it difficult for people to access information. The benefits of having access to ICT are numerous. ICT has the potential to promote other sectors of the economy such as agriculture, education, health, bank, defence etc. In times of emergency, ICT becomes an indispensable tool for overcoming the barriers of time and distance. Education, lack of electrical infrastructure, income, urban drift, and a variety of other social and political factors contribute to Nigeria's growing digital divide.

The digital divide in Ethiopia refers to inequalities between individuals, households, and other groups of different demographic and socioeconomic levels in Ethiopia in access to information and communication technologies ("ICTs") and in the knowledge and skills needed to effectively use the information gained from connecting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Female education in STEM</span>

Female education in STEM refers to child and adult female representation in the educational fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In 2017, 33% of students in STEM fields were women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital divide by continent, area and country</span>

The digital divide is an economic and social inequality with regard to access to, use of, or impact of information and communication technologies (ICT). Factors causing the divide can vary depending on the country and culture, as can the potential solutions for minimizing or closing the divide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital divide in Thailand</span> Overview of the role of the digital divide in Thailand

The digital divide in Thailand refers to the economic, educational, and social inequalities between the Thai people who have access to information and communications technology (ICT) and those who do not. Thailand is a developing country within Southeast Asia, and is currently confronted with this problem. There are a number of factors that determine the digital divide within a country, including income, choice of technologies and socioeconomic factors. ICT development and mobile penetration are strongly correlated with economic growth and social benefits.

Digital inclusion involves the activities necessary to ensure equitable access to and use of information and communication technologies for participation in social and economic life including for education, social services, health, social and community participation. Digital inclusion includes access to affordable broadband Internet services, Internet-enabled devices, access to digital literacy training, quality technical support, and applications and online content designed to enable and encourage self-sufficiency, participation, and collaboration. Related concepts include digital divide, digital exclusion and digital inequality however digital inclusion focuses more on the strategies, policies and programs required to address the digital divide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable Development Goal 4</span> 4th of 17 Sustainable Development Goals to achieve quality education for all

Sustainable Development Goal 4 is about quality education and is among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations in September 2015. The full title of SDG 4 is "Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital divide in Colombia</span> Overview of the role of the digital divide in Colombia

The digital divide in Colombia refers to inequalities between individuals, households, and other groups of different demographic and socioeconomic levels. More specifically, differences in access to information and communication technologies ("ICTs") and in the knowledge and skills needed to effectively use the information gained from connecting.

References

Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO. Text taken from I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education​, UNESCO, EQUALS Skills Coalition, UNESCO. UNESCO.

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 UNESCO, EQUALS Skills Coalition (2019). "I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education" (PDF).
  2. ↑ Egodawatte, Gunawardena; McDougall, Douglas; Stoilescu, Dorian (2011-05-04). "The effects of teacher collaboration in Grade 9 Applied Mathematics". Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 10 (3): 189–209. doi:10.1007/s10671-011-9104-y. ISSN   1570-2081. S2CID   144810635.
  3. ↑ De Andrés del Campo, Susana; Collado Alonso, Rocío; García-Lomas Taboada, José Ignacio (2020-06-19). "Brechas digitales de género. Una revisión del concepto". Etic@net. Revista científica electrónica de Educación y Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. 20 (1): 34–58. doi: 10.30827/eticanet.v20i1.15521 . ISSN   1695-324X. S2CID   234763682.
  4. ↑ UNESCO (2017). Global Education Monitoring Report 2017/8. Accountability in Education: Meeting Our Commitments. Paris, UNESCO: UNESCO.
  5. ↑ OECD (2018). "Bridging the Digital Gender Divide: Include, Upskill, Innovate". OECD.
  6. ↑ Mariscal, J., Mayne, G., Aneja, U. and Sorgner, A (2018). "Bridging the Gender Digital Gap". Buenos Aires, CARI/CIPPEC.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ↑ Shah, Huma; Warwick, Kevin (2016). "Imitating Gender as a Measure for Artificial Intelligence: - is It Necessary?" (PDF). Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications. pp. 126–131. doi:10.5220/0005673901260131. ISBN   978-989-758-172-4.
  8. ↑ Beede, David N.; Julian, Tiffany A.; Langdon, David; McKittrick, George; Khan, Beethika; Doms, Mark E. (2011-08-01). "Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation". Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1964782. S2CID   151118426. SSRN   1964782.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. ↑ Card, David; Payne, A. Abigail (2021). "High School Choices and the Gender Gap in Stem". Economic Inquiry. 59 (1): 9–28. doi:10.1111/ecin.12934. hdl: 11343/253940 . ISSN   1465-7295. S2CID   230538125.
  10. ↑ Brunner, J. (2014-04-21). "Bridging the gap between wild and laboratory animals". Lab Animal. 43 (5): 175. doi: 10.1038/laban.505 . ISSN   0093-7355. PMID   24751854. S2CID   19511454.
  11. ↑ EQUALS Research Group (2018). "Taking Stock: Data and Evidence on Gender Equality in Digital Access, Skills and Leadership: Preliminary Findings of a Review". EQUALS Research Group. Geneva, EQUALS Global Partnership.
  12. ↑ Girl Effect & Vodafone Foundation (2018). "Real girls, real lives, connected".
  13. ↑ "Bridging the rural digital divide". OECD Digital Economy Papers. 2018-02-23. doi:10.1787/852bd3b9-en. ISSN   2071-6826.
  14. 1 2 Abbate, Janet (2012). Recoding Gender: Womens Changing Participation in Computing. The MIT Press.
  15. ↑ Smith, Erika (2013). "Recognizing a Collective Inheritance Through the History of Women in Computing". Perdue University Press. 15 (1).
  16. ↑ Thompson, Clive (2019). "The Secret History of Women in Coding". The New York Times.
  17. 1 2 ITU (2017). "ICT Facts and Figures 2017" (PDF).
  18. ↑ Araba Sey and Nancy Hafkin, Editors Macau (2019). "aking Stock: Data and Evidence on Gender Equality in Digital Access, Skills and Leadership" (PDF). EQUALS Global Partnership.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  19. ↑ The Mobile Gender Gap Report 2020 . London: GSMA. 2020.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Gender-responsive digitalization: A critical component of the COVID-19 response in Africa. Accra: FAO. 2021. doi:10.4060/cb5055en. ISBN   978-92-5-134540-5. S2CID   243180955.
  21. ↑ GSMA, 2019
  22. ↑ Byte by Byte: Policy Innovation for Transforming Africa's Food System with Digital Technologies (PDF). Dakar: Malabo Montpellier Panel. 2019.
  23. ↑ World Economic Forum (2015). "Expanding Participation and Boosting Growth: The Infrastructure Needs of the Digital Economy" (PDF). World Economic Forum.
  24. ↑ World Wide Web Foundation (2015). Women's Rights Online: Translating Access into Empowerment. Geneva: Web Foundation.
  25. ↑ GSMA (2015). "Accelerating Digital Literacy: Empowering women to use the mobile internet". GSMA.
  26. ↑ "Literacy rates". World Bank. 2020.
  27. ↑ European Investment Bank, 2020
  28. ↑ UN Women, 2020
  29. ↑ Ching, Cynthia (2005). "The Legacy of the Digital Divide: Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Early Exposure as Predictors of Full-Spectrum Technology Use Among Young Adults". Urban Education. 40 (4): 395–411. doi:10.1177/0042085905276389.
  30. 1 2 Accenture (2017). Getting to Equal 2017: Closing the Gender Pay Gap. Dublin, Accenture.
  31. ↑ Eby, Lillian T.; Allen, Tammy D.; Evans, Sarah C.; Ng, Thomas; DuBois, David L. (April 2008). "Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals". Journal of Vocational Behavior. 72 (2): 254–267. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005. ISSN   0001-8791. PMC   2352144 . PMID   19343074.
  32. ↑ Szeto, Sabrina H.; Wagemann, Julia; Douglas, Aubin A. (2020-03-23). "Mentorship knows no distance: an online career mentorship programme by Women in Geospatial+". Egu General Assembly Conference Abstracts: 266. Bibcode:2020EGUGA..22..266S. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-266 . S2CID   226001236.
  33. ↑ "Closing the gender gap?". 2016-01-18. doi:10.1787/trends_edu-2016-graph15-en . Retrieved 2023-04-04.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  34. ↑ "NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM)". NSF - National Science Foundation. 2 December 2022. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  35. 1 2 Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. and Punie, Y (2017). "The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Luxembourg, European Commission" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ↑ "Measuring User-Created Content: Implications for the ICT Access and Use by Households and Individuals Surveys". OECD Digital Economy Papers. 2008-01-30. doi: 10.1787/230554851603 . ISSN   2071-6826.
  37. ↑ "Pathway Mapping Methodology – Global Alliance to Monitor Learning" . Retrieved 2020-03-20.
  38. ↑ "Assessing Digital Stories: The Opportunities and Challenges of New Media Evaluation", Digital Storytelling in the Classroom: New Media Pathways to Literacy, Learning, and Creativity, Corwin Press, pp. 83–92, 2013, doi:10.4135/9781452277479.n4, ISBN   978-1-4522-6825-5
  39. ↑ Quirós, C. T., Morales, E. G., Pastor, R. R., Carmona, A. F., Ibáñez, M. S. and Herrera, U. M. (2018). "Increase in gender gap in the digital sector - Study on Women in the Digital Age".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. ↑ Clark, P (2018). "The digital future is female — but not in a good way". Financial Times.
  41. ↑ Danielescu, Andreea (2020-07-22). "Eschewing Gender Stereotypes in Voice Assistants to Promote Inclusion". Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. CUI '20. Bilbao, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1–3. doi:10.1145/3405755.3406151. ISBN   978-1-4503-7544-3. S2CID   220497479.
  42. ↑ "Why computer voices are mostly female | CNN Business". CNN . 21 October 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.