Greenpeace v. Eni

Last updated

Greenpeace v. Eni
Emblem of Italy.svg
CourtCivil Court of Rome
Full case nameGreenpeace Italy v. ENI S.p.A., the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A.

Greenpeace v. Eni is a 2024 human rights law and tort law suit heard by the Civil Court of Rome, Italy related to efforts by several NGOs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. [1] [2] The lawsuit was brought by the Italian branch of Greenpeace, the advocacy group ReCommon, and twelve civil plaintiffs. The suit was filed against energy company Eni and two of its co-owners, the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance and the investment bank Cassa Depositi e Prestiti. [3] [4]

Contents

The case, which is based on the 2021 Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell court case, is the first climate change lawsuit filed against a privately owned company in Italy. [3] [5]

Background and previous cases

In April 2019, Milieudefensie (the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth), Greenpeace, ActionAid and four other NGOs, together with 17,379 Dutch individual claimants, filed Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell , a class-action lawsuit against Shell plc, arguing that the oil corporation should change its business model to reduce their carbon emissions by 45% by 2030, in line with the goals set by Paris Agreement. [6] [7] According to the plaintiffs, by failing to adjust to a more sustainable model, Shell had failed to uphold the unwritten duty of care laid down in Book 6 Section 162 of the Burgerlijk Wetboek (Dutch Civil Code), as well as articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [7] [8] Hearings at the district court of The Hague were held in December 2020; [7] in May 2021, judges ordered Shell to reduce its global emissions by 45% by 2030, compared to 2019 levels, with the reduction targets including emissions both from its operations and products. [9] [10] Although Shell appealed the ruling, the case was considered the first major lawsuit to hold a corporation accountable for insufficient measures taken to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. [10] [11]

On 5 June 2021, a group of 24 associations and 179 civil plaintiffs (17 of whom were minors), led by non-profit association A Sud (To South in Italian), filed a lawsuit against the Italian government in the Civil Court of Rome, with the main goals of holding national institutions "accountable for the state of danger caused by [their] inertia in tackling the climate change emergency", and securing a ruling that Italy must cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 92% by 2030, as compared to 1990 levels. [12] [13] While the co-plaintiffs included members of the Italian branch of Fridays For Future, [12] as well as meteorologist Luca Mercalli  [ it ], [12] [13] other notable environmentalist organizations, including Legambiente and the Italian branch of Greenpeace, opted not to support the lawsuit. The president of Greenpeace Italy, Giuseppe Onufrio, justified the decision by stating that court cases should focus on influential companies, rather than institutions, to be more effective. [12] [13] On 26 February 2023, the Court of Rome ruled that the case was inadmissible, explaining that the court had not the power to decide on climate matters related to the political sphere; the legal team of the plaintiffs and associations involved in the case announced that they would appeal the judgement. [14]

On 9 May 2023, the Italian branch of Greenpeace, the advocacy group ReCommon, and twelve Italian civil plaintiffs announced that they would file a lawsuit against energy company Eni, as well as the Ministry of Economy and Finance and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (both involved as co-owners), in the Civil Court of Rome, [3] [4] requesting that hearings begin in November of the same year. [4] [15] Having been modeled around the Milieudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell court case, [15] [16] the lawsuit became the first climate litigation against a privately owned company in Italy. [3] [4] [17] Greenpeace and ReCommon also launched a campaign in support of their lawsuit, named La Giusta Causa (The Right Cause in Italian). [16] [18]

The allegations against Eni focused on the company's central role in increasing fossil fuel usage during the latest decades, despite being aware of the risks related to carbon emissions. [3] [15] A DeSmog inquiry shared some of the documents used by the plaintiffs as evidence supporting their lawsuit: [19] firstly, a study commissioned by Eni itself to an affiliate research centre between 1969 and 1970, which had underlined the risk of a "catastrophic" climate crisis by 2000, posed by an unchecked rise in fossil fuel usage; [15] [19] secondly, a 1978 report produced by Tecneco, another sub-division of Eni, which had accurately estimated that the CO2 concentration would have reached 375-400 ppm by 2000, [5] [15] while noting that such changes to the thermal balance of the atmosphere of Earth could have had "serious consequences for the biosphere." [3] [15] DeSmog's investigation also found that Eni's magazine, Ecos  [ it ], had repeatedly included references to climate change in articles written throughout the late 1980s and 1990s, while hosting advertising campaigns wrongly claiming that natural gas was a "clean fuel". [5] [15] [19]

The twelve citizens who joint-filed the lawsuit lived in several different Italian areas that had been affected directly by the consequences of climate change: [3] [4] [18] for instance, four of them were from Polesine, [18] an area within the Veneto region at high risk of hydrogeological damage due to sea level rise and consequent saltwater intrusion within the delta of the Po River, [3] [4] whereas two other plaintiffs lived in heavily-polluted areas of Piedmont, a region hit by persistent droughts in previous years; [18] finally, two citizens hailed from areas that suffered the worst outcomes of the 2018 Vaia Storm. [18]

As a result of these allegations, the plaintiffs asked the court to "acknowledge the damage and the violation of [their] human rights to life, health and an undisturbed personal life" and rule that Eni must cut their emissions from 2020 levels by 45% by 2030, in order to reach the goals set by the Paris Agreement. [4] [17] In an official response, Eni's board said they would prove the lawsuit was "groundless", claiming that their decarbonisation plans satisfied "the essential objectives of sustainability, energy security and competitiveness of Italy", while labeling ReCommon's accusations as "repeated defamatory actions". [4] [15]

Protests at Eni's headquarters

In the night between 4 and 5 December 2023, a group of Greenpeace activists gathered in front of Eni's headquarters in the EUR district in Rome; [20] some of them scaled the building from both sides, before unfurling two banners with the phrase, "Today's emissions = tomorrow's deaths", while others projected anti-fossil fuel and pro-climate justice slogans onto the building. [21] [22] The activists also installed an eight-metre block with the phrase, "Eni's legacy = climate deaths" in proximity of the company's headquarters. [21] [22] The same day as the demonstration, at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Dubai, the Dutch branch of Greenpeace presented two reports on the estimated impact of carbon emissions from nine major European energy companies, including Eni itself, on premature deaths across the continent by 2100. [20] [21]

Court hearings

The first hearing of the court case took place on 16 February 2024. [1] [2] [18] Eni appointed liberist economist and Bruno Leoni Institute co-founder Carlo Stagnaro, as well as Polytechnic University of Milan professor Stefano Consonni, [1] [2] as their consultants. [1] [2] The decision received some criticism for the perceived lack of independence and competence of both consultants: [1] [2] Stagnaro and the IBL had openly supported climate change denial theories and groups throughout the 2000s and the 2010s, while the academic résumé of Consonni stated that, since 1993, he had been directly involved in research financed by multiple oil and gas companies, including Eni itself, ExxonMobil and BP Alternative Energy, as well as the U.S. Department of Energy. [2]

On the other hand, Greenpeace, ReCommon and the civil plaintiffs received consulting, among others, from CNR research director Nicola Armaroli, psychotherapist and eco-anxiety expert Rita Fioravanzo, and climate change experts Richard Heede and Marco Grasso. [1]

The judge of the Court of Rome eventually agreed to set a second hearing, [14] [23] scheduled for 13 September, [23] on preliminary objections raised by Eni, the MEF and CDP, including a so-called "defect of jurisdiction"; the defendants argued that Italian judges would not have the competence to review the greenhouse gas emissions of companies affiliated to the group and located abroad, nor to rule on matters related to the political or business spheres. [14] [23] Greenpeace and ReCommon criticized the decision in a statement, stating that dismissing the lawsuit could potentially prevent future climate litigation in Italy, while standing in contrast to the outcome of the KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz case. [14] [23]

On 21 June, Eni published a press release stating that Greenpeace and ReCommon had requested to suspend the lawsuit in response to their filing of a jurisdictional review, deeming it as a delay strategy allowing them to "continue their ongoing disinformation campaign, prioritizing media attention over rigorous research, analysis, and evaluation"; [14] the following day, the two associations confirmed that they had appealed to the Supreme Court of Cassation, in order to expedite the trial and underline "the need to protect at the highest judicial level our human rights endangered by the human-made climate emergency". [14] [23] One of the plaintiffs' lawyers, Matteo Ceruti, also clarified that the suspension of the lawsuit was required by the Code of Civil Procedure  [ it ] in order to file an appeal for a regulation of jurisdiction before the Italian Supreme Court. [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenpeace</span> Non-governmental environmental organization

Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning network, founded in Canada in 1971 by a group of environmental activists. Greenpeace states its goal is to "ensure the ability of the Earth to nurture life in all its diversity" and focuses its campaigning on worldwide issues such as climate change, deforestation, overfishing, commercial whaling, genetic engineering, anti-war and anti-nuclear issues. It uses direct action, advocacy, research, and ecotage to achieve its goals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eni</span> Italian multinational energy company

Eni S.p.A., acronym for Ente nazionale idrocarburi, is an Italian multinational energy company headquartered in Rome. It is considered one of the "supermajor" oil companies in the world, with a market capitalization of €50 billion, as of 31 December 2023. The Italian government owns a 30.5% golden share in the company, 1.99% held through the Ministry of Economy and Finance and 28.5% through the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti. The company is a component of the Euro Stoxx 50 stock market index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shell Nigeria</span> Nigerian regional subsidiary of Shell plc

Shell Nigeria is the common name for Shell plc's Nigerian operations carried out through four subsidiaries—primarily Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC). Royal Dutch Shell's joint ventures account for more than 21% of Nigeria's total petroleum production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald M. Gould</span> American judge (born 1946)

Ronald Murray Gould is an American lawyer and jurist serving as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit since 1999.

<i>Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.</i>

Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., No. 4:08-cv-01138, is a lawsuit filed on February 26, 2008, in a United States district court. The suit, based on the common law theory of nuisance, claims monetary damages from the energy industry for the destruction of Kivalina, Alaska by flooding caused by climate change. The damage estimates made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Government Accountability Office are placed between $95 million and $400 million. This lawsuit is an example of greenhouse gas emission liability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shell plc</span> British multinational oil and gas company

Shell plc is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London, England. Shell is a public limited company with a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and secondary listings on Euronext Amsterdam and the New York Stock Exchange. A core component of Big Oil, Shell is the second largest investor-owned oil and gas company in the world by revenue, and among the world's largest companies out of any industry. Measured by both its own emissions, and the emissions of all the fossil fuels it sells, Shell was the ninth-largest corporate producer of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 1988–2015.

Greenpeace USA is the United States affiliate of Greenpeace International, an environmental nonprofit organization that spawned a social movement inspired by direct actions on the high seas to stop whaling and nuclear testing. Headquartered in Washington D.C., Greenpeace U.S.A. operates with an annual budget of approximately $40 million, employing over 500 people in 2020. The organization relies on donations from members, refuses corporate contributions and refrains from endorsing political candidates, though in 2020 Greenpeace USA issued climate scorecards for presidential candidates and ranked them from best to worst on climate

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal in Europe</span>

Coal in Europe is a term describing the use of coal as an energy source in Europe, including both thermal coal used for power generation and coking coal used for steel production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate movement</span> Nongovernmental organizations engaged in climate activism

The climate movement is a global social movement focused on pressuring governments and industry to take action addressing the causes and impacts of climate change. Environmental non-profit organizations have engaged in significant climate activism since the late 1980s and early 1990s, as they sought to influence the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Climate activism has become increasingly prominent over time, gaining significant momentum during the 2009 Copenhagen Summit and particularly following the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claudio Descalzi</span> Italian businessman (born 1955)

Claudio Descalzi is an Italian businessman, and the CEO of Italian oil company Eni since May 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles</span>

Vehicles that are powered by fossil fuels, such as gasoline (petrol), diesel, kerosene, and fuel oil are set to be phased out by a number of countries. It is one of the three most important parts of the general fossil fuel phase-out process, the others being the phase-out of fossil fuel power plants for electricity generation and decarbonisation of industry.

<i>Juliana v. United States</i> 2015 lawsuit

Juliana, et al. v. United States of America, et al. was a climate-related lawsuit filed in 2015 by 21 youth plaintiffs against the United States and several executive branch officials. Filing their case in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, the plaintiffs, represented by the non-profit organization Our Children's Trust, include Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, the members of Martinez's organization Earth Guardians, and climatologist James Hansen as a "guardian for future generations". Some fossil fuel and industry groups initially intervened as defendants but later requested to be dropped following the 2016 presidential election, stating that the case would be well defended under the new administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change litigation</span> Use of legal practice to further climate change mitigation

Climate change litigation, also known as climate litigation, is an emerging body of environmental law using legal practice to set case law precedent to further climate change mitigation efforts from public institutions, such as governments and companies. In the face of slow climate change politics delaying climate change mitigation, activists and lawyers have increased efforts to use national and international judiciary systems to advance the effort. Climate litigation typically engages in one of five types of legal claims: Constitutional law, administrative law, private law (challenging corporations or other organizations for negligence, nuisance, etc., fraud or consumer protection, or human rights.

Our Children's Trust is an American nonprofit public interest law firm based in Oregon that has filed several lawsuits on behalf of youth plaintiffs against state and federal governments, arguing that they are infringing on the youths' rights to a safe climate system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Italy</span> Impact of climate change in Italy

In Italy, widespread impacts of climate change are currently being felt. With an increase in extreme events such as heatwaves, droughts and more frequent flooding, Italy faces many challenges adapting to climate change.

<i>State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation</i> Dutch court case about carbon dioxide emissions

State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation (2019) is climate change litigation heard by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands related to government efforts to curtail carbon dioxide emissions. The case was brought against the Dutch government in 2013, arguing the government, by not meeting a minimum carbon dioxide emission-reduction goal established by scientists to avert harmful climate change, was endangering the human rights of Dutch citizens as set by national and European Union laws.

This is an environmental history of the 2020s. Environmental history refers to events and trends related to the natural environment and human interactions with it. Examples of human-induced events include biodiversity loss, climate change and holocene extinction.

<i>Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell</i> Dutch legal case (2021)

Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell (2021) is a human rights law and tort law case heard by the district court of The Hague in the Netherlands in 2021 related to efforts by several NGO's to curtail carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. It was brought by the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth and a group of other NGO's against the oil corporation, Shell plc. In May 2021, the court ordered Shell to reduce its global carbon emissions from its 2019 levels by 45% by 2030, relating not only to the emissions from its operations, but also those from the products it sells. It is considered to be the first major climate change litigation ruling against a corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniëlle Hirsch</span> Dutch politician (born 1968)

Daniëlle Hirsch is a Dutch economist and politician of GroenLinks, who has been serving in the Dutch House of Representatives since 2023.

<i>Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz v. Switzerland</i> European Court of Human Rights case

Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz v. Switzerland (2024) was a landmark European Court of Human Rights case in which the court ruled that Switzerland violated the European Convention on Human Rights by failing to adequately address climate change. It is the first climate change litigation in which an international court has ruled that state inaction violates human rights.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cotugno, Ferdinando (15 February 2024). "Eni alla sbarra. Al via in Italia il primo processo climatico contro l'azienda". Domani (in Italian). Archived from the original on 22 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Levantesi, Stella (19 February 2024). "Climate Trial Against Oil Giant Eni Opens in Italy". DeSmog . Archived from the original on 22 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Due organizzazioni ambientaliste e 12 persone italiane hanno fatto causa a Eni e al ministero dell'Economia per i danni del cambiamento climatico". Il Post (in Italian). 9 May 2023. Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Talignani, Giacomo (9 May 2023). "Greenpeace, ReCommon e 12 cittadini fanno causa ad Eni per le sue emissioni". la Repubblica (in Italian). Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 Romano, Angelo (12 May 2023). "L'ENI citata in giudizio da Greenpeace e ReCommon: "Sapeva delle cause del cambiamento climatico ma ha continuato a bruciare combustibili fossili". La prima causa 'climatica' in Italia". Valigia Blu (in Italian). Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  6. ↑ "Milieudefensie dagvaardt Shell in rechtszaak om uitstoot". NOS Nieuws (in Dutch). 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 27 May 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  7. 1 2 3 Boffey, Daniel (30 November 2020). "Shell in court over claims it hampered fossil fuels phase-out". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  8. ↑ "Climate change actions against corporations: Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell plc". Clifford Chance . 13 January 2021. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  9. ↑ Brian, Stuart (26 May 2021). "Shell ordered to reduce CO2 emissions in watershed ruling". Deutsche Welle . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  10. 1 2 Boffey, Daniel (26 May 2021). "Court orders Royal Dutch Shell to cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  11. ↑ Zindy, Hanna (26 May 2021). "Court orders Shell to slash CO2 emissions in landmark climate ruling". CNN . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Cotugno, Ferdinando (6 June 2021). "Una causa ambientale allo stato per costringere la politica ad agire" . Domani (in Italian). Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  13. 1 2 3 "Anche in Italia c'è una causa allo stato per il clima". Il Post (in Italian). 6 June 2021. Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Levantesi, Stella (24 June 2024). "Greenpeace Turns to Italy's Highest Court in Lawsuit Against Oil Giant Eni". DeSmog . Retrieved 28 June 2024.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Levantesi, Stella (9 May 2023). "Italian oil firm Eni faces lawsuit alleging early knowledge of climate crisis". The Guardian . ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 8 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  16. 1 2 "Causa civile contro ENI presentata da Greenpeace Italia, ReCommon e 12 cittadine e cittadini italiani: "L'operato della società peggiora la crisi climatica e viola i diritti umani"". Greenpeace Italia (in Italian). 9 May 2023. Archived from the original on 23 February 2024. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  17. 1 2 Wright, Ruth (11 May 2023). "12 Italian citizens are suing one of the world's biggest oil companies". euronews . Archived from the original on 23 February 2024. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sclippa, Natalie (16 February 2024). "Processo contro Eni. Greenpeace e Recommon portano in tribunale il colosso energetico". lavialibera (in Italian). Archived from the original on 22 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  19. 1 2 3 Levantesi, Stella (9 May 2023). "Italy's Eni Faces Lawsuit Alleging Early Knowledge Of Climate Change". DeSmog . Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  20. 1 2 "Blitz di Greenpeace a Roma, attivisti scalano palazzo dell'Eni all'Eur e espongono striscione: "Oggi emissioni = domani morte"". la Repubblica (in Italian). 5 December 2023. Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  21. 1 2 3 Martellini, Laura (5 December 2023). "Attivisti di Greenpeace in azione al palazzo Eni a Roma: scalano l'edificio all'alba". Corriere della Sera (in Italian). Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  22. 1 2 "VIDEO - Blitz di Greenpeace sotto il quartier generale di Eni a Roma: stop a petrolio e gas". Rai News (in Italian). 5 December 2023. Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 Neri, Valentina (24 June 2024). "Greenpeace e ReCommon fanno ricorso in Cassazione per portare avanti 'La giusta causa' sul clima contro Eni". LifeGate (in Italian). Retrieved 28 June 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.