How to Blow Up a Pipeline

Last updated

How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire
How to Blow Up a Pipeline (Cover).jpg
Author Andreas Malm
Publisher Verso Books
Publication date
January 5, 2021
Pages208
ISBN 1-839-76025-7
363
LC Class TD170 .M34 2021

How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire is a nonfiction book written by Andreas Malm and published in 2021 by Verso Books. In the book, Malm argues that sabotage is a logical form of climate activism, and criticizes both pacifism within the climate movement and "climate fatalism" outside it. The book inspired a film of the same name.

Contents

Andreas Malm, a lecturer in human ecology at Lund University, wrote several other books on related subjects before his release of How to Blow Up a Pipeline. Prior to events in 2018 and 2019 including Fridays For Future and climate protest camps in Europe, the book was planned to be an argument that there was a lack of climate activism. These events caused the argument to become a critique of nonviolence and pacifism in the climate activist movement, and an argument for sabotage as a logical form of climate activism.

The book received both positive and negative reviews in various publications.

Background

Andreas Malm giving a lecture at Code Rood Action Camp 2018 in Groningen Andreas Malm at Code Rood 2018.jpg
Andreas Malm giving a lecture at Code Rood Action Camp 2018 in Groningen

Before the release of How to Blow Up a Pipeline, author Andreas Malm had written several other books related to political economy, climate change, and fossil fuels; all were published by Verso Books. As of the book's publication, he was a lecturer in the human ecology department of Lund University. [1]

Malm told Bookforum that he had been studying Ancient Egypt in the first half of 2018, but stopped spending time on that research later that year because he felt a need to focus on climate change, stating that he "was in total despair mode". When he began work on How to Blow Up a Pipeline, he expected to argue that there was a lack of climate activism. However, after the start of Fridays For Future in 2018 and the spread of climate protest camps in Germany and throughout Europe in 2019, Malm described feeling "elated and encouraged by the wave of activism" but frustrated by the climate movement's "strict commitment to absolute nonviolence". The book instead became a critique of nonviolence and pacifism within the movement, [1] and an argument that sabotage is a logical form of climate activism. [2] [3] [4]

How to Blow Up a Pipeline was published on January 5, 2021, by Verso Books. [5]

Synopsis

The book is divided into three chapters, titled Learning from Past Struggles, Breaking the Spell, and Fighting Despair. It also includes a preface. [5] : Contents 

Learning from Past Struggles

Extinction Rebellion protesters block Ebertstrasse in October 2019 with a banner that reads "Non Violent - For Life On Earth" Extinction Rebellion swarming Ebertstrasse 2019-10-07 05.jpg
Extinction Rebellion protesters block Ebertstraße in October 2019 with a banner that reads "Non Violent - For Life On Earth"

In the first chapter, Malm describes a protest he participated outside the COP1 United Nations climate conference in 1995. [2] He asks "At what point do we escalate?", [5] : 8  stating that the modern climate movement has remained committed to "absolute non-violence" and avoided property destruction. [5] : 22–23  He criticizes what he defines as "moral pacifism" for failing to account for defensive violence [5] : 30–32  and argues that "strategic pacifism" as advocated by Bill McKibben and Extinction Rebellion is ahistorical, discussing the radical flank effect in the context of the civil rights movement and questioning whether there are "convincing reasons" to believe that "the struggle against fossil fuels  ... will succeed only on condition of utter peacefulness". [5] : 34–54 

Breaking the Spell

In the second chapter, Malm states that the ruling class will not implement sufficient change to address climate change, and that the climate movement should sabotage devices that produce CO2 emissions in order to discourage new investment in them. [5] : 67–69  He references a 2005 report by the Pipeline and Gas Journal which described pipelines as "very easily sabotaged", and he describes a "long and venerable tradition of sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure", referencing instances of sabotage in apartheid South Africa, by Palestinians, and in Nigeria among other examples. Malm questions why actions like this are not taken for the purposes of the climate, attributing that fact to the "general demise of revolutionary politics" and the "insufficient politicisation of the climate crisis". [5] : 70–76  He characterizes property destruction as a type of violence but states that "we must insist on it being different in kind from the violence that hits a human (or an animal) in the face", subsequently arguing that violence "which hits material conditions necessary for subsistence" should be considered violence against people. [5] : 102–103 

Fighting Despair

Activists at the Schwarze Pumpe power station during Ende Gelande 2016 Im Kraftwerk schwarze Pumpe.jpg
Activists at the Schwarze Pumpe power station during Ende Gelände 2016

In the third and final chapter, Malm argues against critics of collective climate activism like Jonathan Franzen and Roy Scranton, [3] who Malm says are united by "a reification of despair", which he states is "an eminently understandable emotional response to the crisis, but unserviceable as a response for a politics in it". He describes this "climate fatalism" as a contradiction and a self-fulfilling prophecy, writing that "[the] more people who tell us that a radical reorientation is 'scarcely imaginable', the less imaginable it will be". [5] : 141–142  He says that there is no scientific basis for the idea that action now will not have an effect on climate change, stating that people who "think that mitigation is meaningful only at a time when damage is yet to be done ... have misunderstood the basics of both climate science and movement". [5] : 144–146  Malm describes Ende Gelände 2016, during which he and other activists blockaded the Schwarze Pumpe power station, writing that politicians and the media described the action as violent because the activists broke fences. He quotes The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon, stating that Fanon wrote violence "frees the native 'from his despair and inaction; it makes him fearless and restores his self-respect'". He concludes that "There has been a time for a Gandhian climate movement; perhaps there might come a time for a Fanonian one. The breaking of fences may one day be seen as a very minor misdemeanour indeed." [5] : 158–161 

Cover

The cover of How to Blow Up a Pipeline, designed by Chantal Jahchan, appeared as one of 12 on a list of "The Best Book Covers of 2021" assembled by Matt Dorfman, art director of The New York Times Book Review . [6] It was additionally chosen by The Bookseller as one of the best covers of January 2021. [7]

Reception

Reviews

Journalist Wen Stephenson praised How to Blow Up a Pipeline in the Los Angeles Review of Books , describing Malm's approach as "erudite and, above all, morally serious" and stating that the book "methodically dismantles the social movement doctrine of 'strategic nonviolence'". He wrote that he expected the book to be dismissed by many as fringe or dangerous, but described that potential dismissal as "a very serious mistake". [8] Also in the Los Angeles Review of Books, Scott W. Stern wrote that Malm "makes a stirring moral case for the necessity of escalation" and described the book as "passionate, powerful, deeply flawed, and profoundly necessary", stating that it "may excite some readers, anger others, convince still others, and alienate many, but it is unlikely to be forgotten by a single one". [9]

Writing in The New York Times Book Review , Tatiana Schlossberg reviewed How to Blow Up a Pipeline as "compelling but frustrating", writing that violence is problematic because "ultimately it's impossible to control" and noting that the book did not actually include instructions for creating explosions. [10]

In a negative review in Canadian Dimension , a left-wing magazine, James Wilt criticized the book for not discussing the potential repercussions of sabotage, describing that omission as "an astonishing abdication of responsibility". Wilt wrote that "to advocate for [property destruction] without any mention or planning for the inevitable backlash, particularly outside of situations of armed conflict, is to do the work of the carceral state for it". [11]

In another negative review in Jacobin , an American socialist magazine, Chris Maisano criticized the book for assuming that political violence could be controlled, saying that it "has a fundamentally interactive quality that Malm largely fails to account for, and under conditions of intense political contestation, it is all too easy to move from advocating violence against property to violence against people." [12]

By notable figures

A review by Tim DeChristopher in YES! Magazine said that How to Blow Up a Pipeline "offers a humble and nuanced case for how sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure and machinery might be 'synergetic and complementary' to a movement largely centered around nonviolent mass mobilization". [3] DeChristopher criticized the book for not explaining "how to avoid association with a rogue act of violence against humans if a sizable portion of the movement were to abandon the commitment to nonviolence", and praised Malm's "six-point analysis of why luxury emissions are the most strategic and symbolically important target", describing it as "so compelling that it’s hard to read this book without daydreaming about sabotaging the private jets of the ultra-rich". He wrote that "[one] of Malm's most important contributions in the book" is the final chapter in which Malm argues against the belief that it is too late for climate activism. [3]

In an opinion article in The New York Times , columnist Ezra Klein wrote that "[a] truer title would be 'Why to Blow Up a Pipeline'", characterizing Malm's answer as "[because] nothing else has worked". Stating that Malm was "less convincing" about "whether blowing up pipelines would work here, and now", Klein argued that there would likely be political consequences to sabotage, including imprisonment of climate activists as well as political repression. [13] In The New Republic , Benjamin Kunkel wrote that the book "does not explain how to blow up a pipeline so much as argue for why to do so", stating that Malm's argument "provokes a few natural objections" and concluding by agreeing with the author's position that individual political tactics should not be fetishized. [14]

After being asked about the ethics of the eco-terrorism depicted in his novel The Ministry for the Future , author Kim Stanley Robinson told The World Today that he personally believed in nonviolence. He additionally suggested that How to Blow Up a Pipeline would be a better book for thinking about the issue, because it "makes a distinction that [The Ministry for the Future] is not good at, which is the distinction between sabotage and violence against property or destruction of property as against physical attacks on people". [15]

Opposition

In response to Ezra Klein's mention of How to Blow Up a Pipeline in The New York Times, a Fox News article by Lindsay Kornick claimed that Klein "appeared to condone eco-terrorism", writing that "Klein appeared to understand and even sympathize with the author". [16] After Malm was a guest on The New Yorker Radio Hour in September 2021 and spoke about central ideas from the book, another article in Fox News by the same author described him as a "climate change extremist who advocates for 'intelligent sabotage'". [17] [18] In The Spectator World , Grayson Quay argued the fact that the interview took place was hypocritical because an anti-abortion activist who had written a book titled "How to Blow Up an Abortion Clinic" would not have gotten the same opportunity, describing Malm as a "scofflaw". [19]

In October 2021, the Fort Worth Intelligence Exchange (a fusion center in Texas) circulated a document about How to Blow Up a Pipeline nationwide. The document, which was later obtained by Property of the People, detailed concerns about the book and its content while stating that it was not connected to any known threat. [20]

Other reactions

The environmental direct action group, Tyre Extinguishers, who began deflating tyres on SUVs in March 2022 as an act of climate protest, and are now active in 17 countries, say they were inspired to start their group by How to Blow Up a Pipeline. [21] [22] Malm called the group's actions a form of "extremely peaceful and gentle sabotage...anyone can deflate an SUV: it is virtually child's play. It requires no formal organization, no leadership, no funds, no implements other than bits of gravel or beans or green lentils. Given the infinitely replicable nature of the action—sabotage as meme—its potential for making SUV ownership less convenient and attractive could not be discounted." [23]

Film adaptation

The book was adapted into a thriller film, also titled How to Blow Up a Pipeline. The film was directed by Daniel Goldhaber, and written by Ariela Barer, Jordan Sjol, and Goldhaber. It revolves around a group of eight young people who decide to blow up an oil pipeline. [24] It premiered in the Platform Prize program at the 2022 Toronto International Film Festival on September 10, 2022. [25] [26] After its premiere, Neon acquired the North American distribution rights and released it theatrically in the United States on April 7, 2023. [27] [28]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacifism</span> Philosophy opposing war or violence

Pacifism is the opposition or resistance to war, militarism or violence. The word pacifism was coined by the French peace campaigner Émile Arnaud and adopted by other peace activists at the tenth Universal Peace Congress in Glasgow in 1901. A related term is ahimsa, which is a core philosophy in Indian religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. While modern connotations are recent, having been explicated since the 19th century, ancient references abound.

Anarchism and violence have been linked together by events in anarchist history such as violent revolution, terrorism, and assassination attempts. Leading late 19th century anarchists espoused propaganda by deed, or attentáts, and was associated with a number of incidents of political violence. Anarchist thought, however, is quite diverse on the question of violence. Where some anarchists have opposed coercive means on the basis of coherence, others have supported acts of violent revolution as a path toward anarchy. Anarcho-pacifism is a school of thought within anarchism which rejects all violence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonviolence</span> Principle or practice of not causing harm to others

Nonviolence is the personal practice of not causing harm to others under any condition. It may come from the belief that hurting people, animals and/or the environment is unnecessary to achieve an outcome and it may refer to a general philosophy of abstention from violence. It may be based on moral, religious or spiritual principles, or the reasons for it may be strategic or pragmatic. Failure to distinguish between the two types of nonviolent approaches can lead to distortion in the concept's meaning and effectiveness, which can subsequently result in confusion among the audience. Although both principled and pragmatic nonviolent approaches preach for nonviolence, they may have distinct motives, goals, philosophies, and techniques. However, rather than debating the best practice between the two approaches, both can indicate alternative paths for those who do not want to use violence.

Anarcho-pacifism, also referred to as anarchist pacifism and pacifist anarchism, is an anarchist school of thought that advocates for the use of peaceful, non-violent forms of resistance in the struggle for social change. Anarcho-pacifism rejects the principle of violence which is seen as a form of power and therefore as contradictory to key anarchist ideals such as the rejection of hierarchy and dominance. Many anarcho-pacifists are also Christian anarchists, who reject war and the use of violence.

Pacificism is the general term for ethical opposition to violence or war unless force is deemed necessary. Together with pacifism, it is born from the Western tradition or attitude that calls for peace. The former involves the unconditional refusal to support violence or absolute pacifism, but pacificism views the prevention of violence as its duty but recognizes the controlled use of force to achieve such objective. According to Martin Ceadel, pacifism and pacificism are driven by a certain political position or ideology such as liberalism, socialism or feminism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green Scare</span> US government action against the radical environmental movement

The Green Scare is legal action by the US government against the radical environmental movement, that occurred mostly in the 2000s. It alludes to the Red Scares, periods of fear over communist infiltration of US society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steven Best</span> American philosopher, writer and activist (born 1955)

Steven Best is an American philosopher, writer, speaker and activist. His concerns include animal rights, species extinction, human overpopulation, ecological crisis, biotechnology, liberation politics, terrorism, mass media and culture, globalization, and capitalist domination. He is Associate Professor of Humanities and Philosophy at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has published 13 books and over 200 articles and reviews.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christian pacifism</span> Theological and ethical position

Christian pacifism is the theological and ethical position according to which pacifism and non-violence have both a scriptural and rational basis for Christians, and affirms that any form of violence is incompatible with the Christian faith. Christian pacifists state that Jesus himself was a pacifist who taught and practiced pacifism and that his followers must do likewise. Notable Christian pacifists include Martin Luther King Jr., Leo Tolstoy, Adin Ballou, Dorothy Day, Ammon Hennacy, and brothers Daniel and Philip Berrigan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonviolent resistance</span> Act of protest through nonviolent means

Nonviolent resistance, or nonviolent action, sometimes called civil resistance, is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, constructive program, or other methods, while refraining from violence and the threat of violence. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deep Green Resistance</span> Radical environmental movement

Deep Green Resistance (DGR) is a radical environmental movement that perceives the existence of industrial civilization itself as the greatest threat to the natural environment, and calls for its dismantlement and a return to a pre-agricultural level of technology. Although DGR operates as an aboveground group, it calls on others to use underground and violent tactics such as attacks on infrastructure or assassination. A repeated claim in DGR literature is that acts of sabotage could cause a cascading effect and lead to the end of civilization. DGR and far-right ecofascists use similar accelerationist and anti-majoritarian tactics, seeking systemic collapse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Repertoire of contention</span> Methods of protest

Repertoire of contention refers, in social movement theory, to the set of various protest-related tools and actions available to a movement or related organization in a given time frame. The historian Charles Tilly, who brought the concept into common usage, also referred to the "repertoire of collective action."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct action</span> Method of activism

Direct action is a term for economic and political behavior in which participants use agency—for example economic or physical power—to achieve their goals. The aim of direct action is to either obstruct a certain practice or to solve perceived problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roy Scranton</span> American poet

Roy Scranton is an American writer of fiction, non-fiction, and poetry. His essays, journalism, short fiction, and reviews have appeared in The New York Times, Rolling Stone, The Nation, Dissent, LIT, Los Angeles Review of Books, and Boston Review. His first book, Learning to Die in the Anthropocene was published by City Lights. His novel War Porn was released by Soho Press in August 2016. It was called "One of the best and most disturbing war novels in years" by Sam Sacks in The Wall Street Journal. He co-edited Fire and Forget: Short Stories from the Long War. He currently teaches at the University of Notre Dame, where he is the director of the Environmental Humanities Initiative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andreas Malm</span> Swedish author and human ecologist

Andreas Malm is a Swedish author and an associate professor of human ecology at Lund University. He is on the editorial board of the academic journal Historical Materialism, and has been described as a Marxist. Naomi Klein, who quoted Malm in her book This Changes Everything, has called him "one of the most original thinkers on the subject" of climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Code Rood</span> Climate activist network in the Netherlands

Code Rood is a network of climate activists based in the Netherlands. The activists organize large-scale civil disobedience actions in opposition to the fossil fuel industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helen Steven</span> Scottish Quaker peace activist

Helen Steven was a Scottish Quaker peace activist and one of the founders of the Scottish Centre for Nonviolence. Her opposition to the nuclear submarine base in Scotland was recognised with the Gandhi International Peace Award in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyre Extinguishers</span> Direct action group against SUVs

Tyre Extinguishers is an international climate direct action group which deflates the tyres on sport utility vehicles (SUVs). The group describes driving an SUV as "among the worst single actions that one can take in terms of its climate impacts and its adverse effects on public safety", with SUVs having a disproportionately large impact on the climate crisis relative to other vehicles, worsening air pollution and being more likely to kill pedestrians than smaller sedan cars. The group has called for a ban on SUVs in cities, and has said that they "want to make it impossible to own a huge polluting 4x4 in the world’s urban areas".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Worth Intelligence Exchange</span> Fusion center in Fort Worth, Texas

The Fort Worth Intelligence Exchange is a fusion center housed within the Fort Worth Police Department.

Daniel Goldhaber is an American director, screenwriter, and producer. In 2018, he directed Cam, a psychological horror film set in the world of webcam pornography. In 2022, he co-wrote, directed, and produced the thriller film How to Blow Up a Pipeline, based on the book of the same name by Andreas Malm.

<i>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</i> (film) 2022 film directed by Daniel Goldhaber

How to Blow Up a Pipeline is a 2022 American action-thriller film directed by Daniel Goldhaber, who co-wrote the screenplay with Ariela Barer and Jordan Sjol. It relies on ideas advanced in Andreas Malm's 2021 book of the same name, published by Verso Books. Malm's nonfiction work examines the history of social justice movements and argues for property destruction as a valid tactic in the pursuit of environmental justice. The film stars Ariela Barer, Kristine Froseth, Lukas Gage, Forrest Goodluck, Sasha Lane, Jayme Lawson, Marcus Scribner, Jake Weary, and Irene Bedard.

References

  1. 1 2 Lossin, R.H. (February 9, 2021). "Bookforum talks with Andreas Malm about his new book, How to Blow Up a Pipeline". Bookforum . Archived from the original on September 13, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
  2. 1 2 Hurst, Phoebe (February 4, 2021). "The Limits of Peaceful Protest in a World That Is Burning". Vice News . Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 4 DeChristopher, Tim (February 16, 2021). "In a World on Fire, Is Nonviolence Still an Option?". YES! Magazine . Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  4. ↑ Beuret, Nick (2022). "What Will It Take for the Climate Movement to Win?". Commons Social Change Library. Archived from the original on June 23, 2022. Retrieved June 23, 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Malm, Andreas (January 5, 2021). How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire. Verso Books. ISBN   978-1-83976-025-9. OCLC   1141142279. Archived from the original on September 12, 2022. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  6. ↑ Dorfman, Matt (December 17, 2021). "The Best Book Covers of 2021". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 29, 2022. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  7. ↑ "Cover design round-up: January 2021". The Bookseller . January 6, 2021. Archived from the original on December 27, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  8. ↑ Stephenson, Wen (January 5, 2021). "No Safe Options: A Conversation with Andreas Malm". Los Angeles Review of Books . Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  9. ↑ Stern, Scott W. (January 5, 2021). "Sabotage Can Be Done Softly: On Andreas Malm's "How to Blow Up a Pipeline"". Los Angeles Review of Books . Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  10. ↑ Schlossberg, Tatiana (January 22, 2021). "Three Books Offer New Ways to Think About Environmental Disaster". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  11. ↑ Wilt, James (March 3, 2021). "How to blow up a movement: Andreas Malm's new book dreams of sabotage but ignores consequences". Canadian Dimension . Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  12. ↑ Maisano, Chris (July 29, 2023). "Don't Blow Up a Pipeline". Jacobin . Retrieved August 1, 2023.
  13. ↑ Klein, Ezra (July 15, 2021). "It Seems Odd That We Would Just Let the World Burn". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 12, 2022. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
  14. ↑ Kunkel, Benjamin (May 26, 2021). "The Climate Case for Property Destruction". The New Republic . ISSN   0028-6583. Archived from the original on September 13, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
  15. ↑ Escobales, Roxanne (October 1, 2021). "Interview: Kim Stanley Robinson". The World Today . Chatham House. ISSN   0043-9134. Archived from the original on October 3, 2021. Retrieved October 22, 2021.
  16. ↑ Kornick, Lindsay (July 18, 2021). "NY Times columnist excuses eco-terrorism against oil companies". Fox News . Archived from the original on September 13, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
  17. ↑ Remnick, David (September 24, 2021). "Should the Climate Movement Embrace Sabotage?". The New Yorker . Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
  18. ↑ Kornick, Lindsay (September 26, 2021). "New Yorker hosts climate change extremist who advocates for 'intelligent sabotage'". Fox News . Archived from the original on September 26, 2021. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
  19. ↑ Quay, Grayson (September 29, 2021). "The green movement flirts with violent sabotage". The Spectator World . Archived from the original on September 12, 2022. Retrieved October 22, 2021.
  20. ↑ Swan, Betsy Woodruff; Colman, Zack (December 3, 2021). "How to blow up a podcast". Politico . Archived from the original on May 24, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2021.
  21. ↑ Carrington, Damian (February 28, 2023). "Carbon emissions from global SUV fleet outweighs that of most countries". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved April 23, 2023.
  22. ↑ Childs, Simon; selimbulut (August 11, 2022). "Tyre Extinguishers: direct action group deflating climate change". Rolling Stone UK. Retrieved April 23, 2023.
  23. ↑ "Andreas Malm introduces Verso's new free ebook, Property Will Cost Us". Verso. Retrieved April 23, 2023.
  24. ↑ Kuplowsky, Peter. "How To Blow Up A Pipeline". TIFF. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
  25. ↑ Vlessing, Etan (August 3, 2022). "Toronto Film Festival: Emily Bronte Movie 'Emily' to Open Platform Competition". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
  26. ↑ Kay, Jeremy (August 3, 2022). "Frances O'Connor's 'Emily' to open TIFF Platform alongside films from Maïmouna Doucouré, Rima Das". Archived from the original on August 5, 2022. Retrieved August 25, 2022.
  27. ↑ Ravindran, Manori (September 13, 2022). "Neon Buys TIFF Environmental Thriller How to Blow Up a Pipeline". Variety . Penske Media Corporation. Archived from the original on September 13, 2022. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  28. ↑ Lattanzio, Ryan (March 2, 2023). "'How to Blow Up a Pipeline' Trailer: Neon's Environmental Thriller Is Off the Rails". IndieWire . Retrieved April 21, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.