Hypernucleus

Last updated

A hypernucleus is similar to a conventional atomic nucleus, but contains at least one hyperon in addition to the normal protons and neutrons. Hyperons are a category of baryon particles that carry non-zero strangeness quantum number, which is conserved by the strong and electromagnetic interactions.

Contents

A variety of reactions give access to depositing one or more units of strangeness in a nucleus. Hypernuclei containing the lightest hyperon, the lambda (Λ), tend to be more tightly bound than normal nuclei, though they can decay via the weak force with a mean lifetime of around 200  ps . Sigma (Σ) hypernuclei have been sought, as have doubly-strange nuclei containing xi baryons (Ξ) or two Λ's.

Nomenclature

Baryon-octet-small.svg
Baryon-decuplet-small.svg
The combinations of three up, down, and strange quarks with total spin 1⁄2 (left) and with total spin 3⁄2 (right).

Hypernuclei are named in terms of their atomic number and baryon number, as in normal nuclei, plus the hyperon(s) which are listed in a left subscript of the symbol, with the caveat that atomic number is interpreted as the total charge of the hypernucleus, including charged hyperons such as the xi minus (Ξ−) as well as protons. For example, the hypernucleus 16
Λ O
contains 8 protons, 7 neutrons, and one Λ (which carries no charge). [1]

History

The first was discovered by Marian Danysz and Jerzy Pniewski in 1952 using a nuclear emulsion plate exposed to cosmic rays, based on their energetic but delayed decay. This event was inferred to be due to a nuclear fragment containing a Λ baryon. [2] Experiments until the 1970s would continue to study hypernuclei produced in emulsions using cosmic rays, and later using pion (π) and kaon (K) beams from particle accelerators. [1]

Since the 1980s, more efficient production methods using pion and kaon beams have allowed further investigation at various accelerator facilities, including CERN, Brookhaven National Laboratory, KEK, DAφNE, and JPARC. [3] [4] In the 2010s, heavy ion experiments such as ALICE and STAR first allowed the production and measurement of light hypernuclei formed through hadronization from quark–gluon plasma. [5]

Properties

Hypernuclear physics differs from that of normal nuclei because a hyperon is distinguishable from the four nucleon spin and isospin. That is, a single hyperon is not restricted by the Pauli exclusion principle, and can sink to the lowest energy level. [6] As such, hypernuclei are often smaller and more tightly bound than normal nuclei; [7] for example, the lithium hypernucleus 7
ΛLi
 is 19% smaller than the normal nucleus 6Li. [8] [9] However, the hyperons can decay via the weak force; the mean lifetime of a free Λ is 263±2  ps , and that of a Λ hypernucleus is usually slightly shorter. [10]

A generalized mass formula has been developed for both the non-strange normal nuclei and strange hypernuclei can estimate masses of hypernuclei containing Λ, ΛΛ, Σ, and Ξ hyperon(s). [11] [12] The neutron and proton driplines for hypernuclei are predicted and existence of some exotic hypernuclei beyond the normal neutron and proton driplines are suggested. [7] This generalized mass formula was named the "Samanta formula" by Botvina and Pochodzalla and used to predict relative yields of hypernuclei in heavy-ion collisions. [13]

Types

Λ hypernuclei

The simplest, and most well understood, type of hypernucleus includes only the lightest hyperon, the Λ. [6]

While two nucleons can interact through the nuclear force mediated by a virtual pion, the Λ becomes a Σ baryon upon emitting a pion, [lower-alpha 1] so the Λ–nucleon interaction is mediated solely by more massive mesons such as the η and ω mesons, or through the simultaneous exchange of two or more mesons. [15] This means that the Λ–nucleon interaction is weaker and has a shorter range than the standard nuclear force, and the potential well of a Λ in the nucleus is shallower than that of a nucleon; [16] in hypernuclei, the depth of the Λ potential is approximately 30  MeV. [17] However, one-pion exchange in the Λ–nucleon interaction does cause quantum-mechanical mixing of the Λ and Σ baryons in hypernuclei (which does not happen in free space), especially in neutron-rich hypernuclei. [18] [19] [20] Additionally, the three-body force between a Λ and two nucleons is expected to be more important than the three-body interaction in nuclei, since the Λ can exchange two pions with a virtual Σ intermediate, while the equivalent process in nucleons requires a relatively heavy delta baryon (Δ) intermediate. [15]

Like all hyperons, Λ hypernuclei can decay through the weak interaction, which changes it to a lighter baryon and emits a meson or a lepton–antilepton pair. In free space, the Λ usually decays via the weak force to a proton and a π– meson, or a neutron and a π0, with a total half-life of 263±2  ps . [21] A nucleon in the hypernucleus can cause the Λ to decay via the weak force without emitting a pion; this process becomes dominant in heavy hypernuclei, due to suppression of the pion-emitting decay mode. [22] The half-life of the Λ in a hypernucleus is considerably shorter, plateauing to about 215±14 ps near 56
Λ Fe
, [23] but some empirical measurements substantially disagree with each other or with theoretical predictions. [24]

Hypertriton

The simplest hypernucleus is the hypertriton (3
Λ H
), which consists of one proton, one neutron, and one Λ hyperon. The Λ in this system is very loosely bound, having a separation energy of 130 keV and a large radius of 10.6  fm, [25] compared to about 2.13 fm for the deuteron. [26]

This loose binding would imply a lifetime similar to a free Λ. However, the measured hypertriton lifetime averaged across all experiments (about 206+15
−13 ps) is substantially shorter than predicted by theory, as the non-mesonic decay mode is expected to be relatively minor; some experimental results are substantially shorter or longer than this average. [27] [28]

Σ hypernuclei

The existence of hypernuclei containing a Σ baryon is less clear. Several experiments in the early 1980s reported bound hypernuclear states above the Λ separation energy and presumed to contain one of the slightly heavier Σ baryons, but experiments later in the decade ruled out the existence of such states. [6] Results from exotic atoms containing a Σ− bound to a nucleus by the electromagnetic force have found a net repulsive Σ–nucleon interaction in medium-sized and large hypernuclei, which means that no Σ hypernuclei exist in such mass range. [6] However, an experiment in 1998 definitively observed the light Σ hypernucleus 4
Σ He
. [6]

ΛΛ and Ξ hypernuclei

Hypernuclei containing two Λ baryons have been made. However, such hypernuclei are much harder to produce due to containing two strange quarks, and As of 2016, only seven candidate ΛΛ hypernuclei have been observed. [29] Like the Λ–nucleon interaction, empirical and theoretical models predict that the Λ–Λ interaction is mildly attractive. [30] [31]

Hypernuclei containing a Ξ baryon are known. Empirical studies and theoretical models indicate that the Ξ––proton interaction is attractive, but weaker than the Λ–nucleon interaction. [30] Like the Σ– and other negatively charged particles, the Ξ– can also form an exotic atom. When a Ξ– is bound in an exotic atom or a hypernucleus, it quickly decays to a ΛΛ hypernucleus or to two Λ hypernuclei by exchanging a strange quark with a proton, which releases about 29 MeV of energy in free space: [lower-alpha 2]

Ξ− + p → Λ + Λ [33] [34] [25]

Ω hypernuclei

Hypernuclei containing the omega baryon (Ω) were predicted using lattice QCD in 2018; in particular, the proton–Ω and Ω–Ω dibaryons (bound systems containing two baryons) are expected to be stable. [35] [36] As of 2022, no such hypernuclei have been observed under any conditions, but the lightest such species could be produced in heavy-ion collisions, [37] and measurements by the STAR experiment are consistent with the existence of the proton–Ω dibaryon. [38]

Hypernuclei with higher strangeness

Since the Λ is electrically neutral and its nuclear force interactions are attractive, there are predicted to be arbitrarily large hypernuclei with high strangeness and small net charge, including species with no nucleons. Binding energy per baryon in multi-strange hypernuclei can reach up to 21 MeV/A under certain conditions, [7] compared to 8.80 MeV/A for the ordinary nucleus 62Ni. [39] Additionally, formation of Ξ baryons should quickly become energetically favorable, unlike when there are no Λ's, because the exchange of strangeness with a nucleon would be impossible due to the Pauli exclusion principle. [40]

Production

Several modes of production have been devised to make hypernuclei through bombardment of normal nuclei.

Strangeness exchange and production

One method of producing a K− meson exchanges a strange quark with a nucleon and changes it to a Λ: [41]

p + K− → Λ + π0
n + K− → Λ + π−

The cross section for the formation of a hypernucleus is maximized when the momentum of the kaon beam is approximately 500 MeV/c. [42] Several variants of this setup exist, including ones where the incident kaons are either brought to rest before colliding with a nucleus. [41]

In rare cases, the incoming K− can instead produce a Ξ hypernucleus via the reaction:

p + K− → Ξ− + K+ [43]

The equivalent strangeness production reaction involves a π+ meson reacts with a neutron to change it to a Λ: [44]

n + π+ → Λ + K+

This reaction has a maximum cross section at a beam momentum of 1.05 GeV/c, and is the most efficient production route for Λ hypernuclei, but requires larger targets than strangeness exchange methods. [44]

Elastic scattering

Electron scattering off of a proton can change it to a Λ and produce a K+: [45]

p + e− → Λ + e−′ + K+

where the prime symbol denotes a scattered electron. The energy of an electron beam can be more easily tuned than pion or kaon beams, making it easier to measure and calibrate hypernuclear energy levels. [45] Initially theoretically predicted in the 1980s, this method was first used experimentally in the early 2000s. [46]

Hyperon capture

The capture of a Ξ− baryon by a nucleus can make a Ξ− exotic atom or hypernucleus. [33] Upon capture, it changes to a ΛΛ hypernucleus or two Λ hypernuclei. [47] The disadvantage is that the Ξ− baryon is harder to make into a beam than singly strange hadrons. [48] However, an experiment at J-PARC begun in 2020 will compile data on Ξ and ΛΛ hypernuclei using a similar, non-beam setup where scattered Ξ− baryons rain onto an emulsion target. [33]

Heavy-ion collisions

Similar species

Kaonic nuclei

The K– meson can orbit a nucleus in an exotic atom, such as in kaonic hydrogen. [49] Although the K–-proton strong interaction in kaonic hydrogen is repulsive, [50] the K––nucleus interaction is attractive for larger systems, so this meson can enter a strongly bound state closely related to a hypernucleus; [6] in particular, the K––proton–proton system is experimentally known and more tightly bound than a normal nucleus. [51]

Charmed hypernuclei

Nuclei containing a charm quark have been predicted theoretically since 1977, [52] and are described as charmed hypernuclei despite the possible absence of strange quarks. [53] In particular, the lightest charmed baryons, the Λc and Σc baryons, [lower-alpha 3] are predicted to exist in bound states in charmed hypernuclei, and could be created in processes analogous to those used to make hypernuclei. [53] The depth of the Λc potential in nuclear matter is predicted to be 58 MeV, [53] but unlike Λ hypernuclei, larger hypernuclei containing the positively charged Λc would be less stable than the corresponding Λ hypernuclei due to Coulomb repulsion. [54] The mass difference between the Λc and the
Σ+
c is too large for appreciable mixing of these baryons to occur in hypernuclei. [55] Weak decays of charmed hypernuclei have strong relativistic corrections compared to those in ordinary hypernuclei, as the energy released in the decay process is comparable to the mass of the Λ baryon. [56]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Isospin (I), a number describing the up and down quark content of the system, is preserved in the strong interaction. Since the isospin of a pion is 1, the Λ baryon (I = 0) must become a Σ (I = 1) upon emitting a pion. [14]
  2. ↑ The initial proton and Ξ– have respective masses of approximately 938.3 and 1321.7 MeV, while the outgoing Λ's are each about 1115.7 MeV; [32] the energy that is released is equal to the amount of mass that is lost (times c2).
  3. ↑ The subscript c in the symbols for charmed baryons indicate that a strange quark in a hyperon is replaced with a charm quark; the superscript, if present, still represents the total charge of the baryon.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baryon</span> Hadron (subatomic particle) that is composed of three quarks

In particle physics, a baryon is a type of composite subatomic particle that contains an odd number of valence quarks, conventionally three. Baryons belong to the hadron family of particles; hadrons are composed of quarks. Baryons are also classified as fermions because they have half-integer spin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proton decay</span> Hypothetical particle decay process of a proton

In particle physics, proton decay is a hypothetical form of particle decay in which the proton decays into lighter subatomic particles, such as a neutral pion and a positron. The proton decay hypothesis was first formulated by Andrei Sakharov in 1967. Despite significant experimental effort, proton decay has never been observed. If it does decay via a positron, the proton's half-life is constrained to be at least 1.67×1034 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omega baryon</span> Subatomic hadron particle

The omega baryons are a family of subatomic hadron particles that are represented by the symbol
Ω
 and are either neutral or have a +2, +1 or −1 elementary charge. They are baryons containing no up or down quarks. Omega baryons containing top quarks are not expected to be observed. This is because the Standard Model predicts the mean lifetime of top quarks to be roughly 5×10−25 s, which is about a twentieth of the timescale for strong interactions, and therefore that they do not form hadrons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charm quark</span> Type of quark

The charm quark, charmed quark, or c quark is an elementary particle found in composite subatomic particles called hadrons such as the J/psi meson and the charmed baryons created in particle accelerator collisions. Several bosons, including the W and Z bosons and the Higgs boson, can decay into charm quarks. All charm quarks carry charm, a quantum number. This second generation is the third-most-massive quark with a mass of 1.27±0.02 GeV/c2 as measured in 2022 and a charge of +2/3e.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pentaquark</span> Human-made subatomic particle

A pentaquark is a human-made subatomic particle, consisting of four quarks and one antiquark bound together; they are not known to occur naturally, or exist outside of experiments specifically carried out to create them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaon</span> Quantum particle

In particle physics, a kaon, also called a K meson and denoted
K
, is any of a group of four mesons distinguished by a quantum number called strangeness. In the quark model they are understood to be bound states of a strange quark and an up or down antiquark.

In particle physics, strangeness is a property of particles, expressed as a quantum number, for describing decay of particles in strong and electromagnetic interactions which occur in a short period of time. The strangeness of a particle is defined as:

In particle physics, the hyperchargeY of a particle is a quantum number conserved under the strong interaction. The concept of hypercharge provides a single charge operator that accounts for properties of isospin, electric charge, and flavour. The hypercharge is useful to classify hadrons; the similarly named weak hypercharge has an analogous role in the electroweak interaction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hyperon</span> Type of strange baryon

In particle physics, a hyperon is any baryon containing one or more strange quarks, but no charm, bottom, or top quark. This form of matter may exist in a stable form within the core of some neutron stars. Hyperons are sometimes generically represented by the symbol Y.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eightfold way (physics)</span> Classification scheme for hadrons

In physics, the eightfold way is an organizational scheme for a class of subatomic particles known as hadrons that led to the development of the quark model. Working alone, both the American physicist Murray Gell-Mann and the Israeli physicist Yuval Ne'eman proposed the idea in 1961. The name comes from Gell-Mann's (1961) paper and is an allusion to the Noble Eightfold Path of Buddhism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exotic hadron</span> Subatomic particles consisting of quarks and gluons

Exotic hadrons are subatomic particles composed of quarks and gluons, but which – unlike "well-known" hadrons such as protons, neutrons and mesons – consist of more than three valence quarks. By contrast, "ordinary" hadrons contain just two or three quarks. Hadrons with explicit valence gluon content would also be considered exotic. In theory, there is no limit on the number of quarks in a hadron, as long as the hadron's color charge is white, or color-neutral.

Charmed baryons are a category of composite particles comprising all baryons made of at least one charm quark. Since their first observation in the 1970s, a large number of distinct charmed baryon states have been identified. Observed charmed baryons have masses ranging between 2300 and 2700 MeV/c2. In 2002, the SELEX collaboration, based at Fermilab published evidence of a doubly charmed baryon, containing two charm quarks) with a mass of ~3520 MeV/c2, but has yet to be confirmed by other experiments. One triply charmed baryon has been predicted but not yet observed.

The Xi baryons or cascade particles are a family of subatomic hadron particles which have the symbol Ξ and may have an electric charge of +2 e, +1 e, 0, or −1 e, where e is the elementary charge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lambda baryon</span> Baryon made of specific quark combinations

The lambda baryons (Λ) are a family of subatomic hadron particles containing one up quark, one down quark, and a third quark from a higher flavour generation, in a combination where the quantum wave function changes sign upon the flavour of any two quarks being swapped. They are thus baryons, with total isospin of 0, and have either neutral electric charge or the elementary charge +1.

The sigma baryons are a family of subatomic hadron particles which have two quarks from the first flavour generation, and a third quark from a higher flavour generation, in a combination where the wavefunction sign remains constant when any two quark flavours are swapped. They are thus baryons, with total isospin of 1, and can either be neutral or have an elementary charge of +2, +1, 0, or −1. They are closely related to the Lambda baryons, which differ only in the wavefunction's behaviour upon flavour exchange.

In high-energy nuclear physics, strangeness production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions is a signature and diagnostic tool of quark–gluon plasma (QGP) formation and properties. Unlike up and down quarks, from which everyday matter is made, heavier quark flavors such as strange and charm typically approach chemical equilibrium in a dynamic evolution process. QGP is an interacting localized assembly of quarks and gluons at thermal (kinetic) and not necessarily chemical (abundance) equilibrium. The word plasma signals that color charged particles are able to move in the volume occupied by the plasma. The abundance of strange quarks is formed in pair-production processes in collisions between constituents of the plasma, creating the chemical abundance equilibrium. The dominant mechanism of production involves gluons only present when matter has become a quark–gluon plasma. When quark–gluon plasma disassembles into hadrons in a breakup process, the high availability of strange antiquarks helps to produce antimatter containing multiple strange quarks, which is otherwise rarely made. Similar considerations are at present made for the heavier charm flavor, which is made at the beginning of the collision process in the first interactions and is only abundant in the high-energy environments of CERN's Large Hadron Collider.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volker Burkert</span> German-American physicist

Volker D. Burkert is a German physicist, academic and researcher. He is a Principal Staff Scientist at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility at Jefferson Lab (JLab) in Newport News, Virginia (USA). He has made major contributions to the design of the CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS) that made it suitable for high luminosity operation in experiments studying spin-polarized electron scattering.

References

  1. 1 2 Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 2.
  2. ↑ Danysz, M.; Pniewski, J. (March 1953). "Delayed disintegration of a heavy nuclear fragment: I". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 44 (350): 348–350. doi:10.1080/14786440308520318.
  3. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 4.
  4. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 29.
  5. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, pp. 53–54.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Feliciello, A; Nagae, T (1 September 2015). "Experimental review of hypernuclear physics: recent achievements and future perspectives". Reports on Progress in Physics. 78 (9): 096301. Bibcode:2015RPPh...78i6301F. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/9/096301. PMID   26317857. S2CID   25818699.
  7. 1 2 3 C. Samanta, P. Roy Chowdhury and D.N.Basu (2008). "Lambda hyperonic effect on the normal driplines". Journal of Physics G . 35 (6): 065101–065110. arXiv: 0802.3172 . Bibcode:2008JPhG...35f5101S. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/6/065101. S2CID   118482655.
  8. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (1 March 2001). "The Incredible Shrinking Nucleus". Physical Review Focus . Vol. 7, no. 11.
  9. ↑ Tanida, K.; Tamura, H.; Abe, D.; Akikawa, H.; Araki, K.; Bhang, H.; Endo, T.; Fujii, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Hashimoto, O.; Imai, K.; Hotchi, H.; Kakiguchi, Y.; Kim, J. H.; Kim, Y. D.; Miyoshi, T.; Murakami, T.; Nagae, T.; Noumi, H.; Outa, H.; Ozawa, K.; Saito, T.; Sasao, J.; Sato, Y.; Satoh, S.; Sawafta, R. I.; Sekimoto, M.; Takahashi, T.; Tang, L.; Xia, H. H.; Zhou, S. H.; Zhu, L. H. (5 March 2001). "Measurement of the B(E2) of and Shrinkage of the Hypernuclear Size". Physical Review Letters. 86 (10): 1982–1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1982. PMID   11289835.
  10. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 18.
  11. ↑ C. Samanta (2006). "Mass formula from normal to hypernuclei". In S. Stoica; L. Trache; R.E. Tribble (eds.). Proceedings of the Carpathian Summer School of Physics 2005. World Scientific. p. 29. ISBN   978-981-270-007-0.
  12. ↑ C. Samanta, P. Roy Chowdhury, D.N.Basu (2006). "Generalized mass formula for non-strange and hyper nuclei with SU(6) symmetry breaking". Journal of Physics G . 32 (3): 363–373. arXiv: nucl-th/0504085 . Bibcode:2006JPhG...32..363S. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/3/010. S2CID   118870657.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ A.S. Botvina; J. Pochodzalla (2007). "Production of hypernuclei in multifragmentation of nuclear spectator matter". Physical Review C . 76 (2): 024909–024912. arXiv: 0705.2968 . Bibcode:2007PhRvC..76b4909B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.024909. S2CID   119652113.
  14. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 20.
  15. 1 2 Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 2, 20–21.
  16. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 6.
  17. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 50.
  18. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 20–21.
  19. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 52.
  20. ↑ Umeya, A.; Harada, T. (20 February 2009). "Λ–Σ coupling effect in the neutron-rich Λ hypernucleus in a microscopic shell-model calculation". Physical Review C. 79 (2): 024315. arXiv: 0810.4591 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024315. S2CID   117921775.
  21. ↑ Amsler, C.; et al. (Particle Data Group) (2008). "
    Λ
    "     (PDF). Particle listings. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
  22. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 50–51.
  23. ↑ Sato, Y.; Ajimura, S.; Aoki, K.; Bhang, H.; Hasegawa, T.; Hashimoto, O.; Hotchi, H.; Kim, Y. D.; Kishimoto, T.; Maeda, K.; Noumi, H.; Ohta, Y.; Omata, K.; Outa, H.; Park, H.; Sekimoto, M.; Shibata, T.; Takahashi, T.; Youn, M. (9 February 2005). "Mesonic and nonmesonic weak decay widths of medium-heavy Λ hypernuclei". Physical Review C. 71 (2): 025203. arXiv: nucl-ex/0409007v2 . Bibcode:2005PhRvC..71b5203S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.025203. S2CID   119428665.
  24. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 17–18.
  25. 1 2 Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 53.
  26. ↑ Tiesinga, Eite; Mohr, Peter J.; Newell, David B.; Taylor, Barry N. (1 September 2021). "CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018". Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 50 (3): 033105. Bibcode:2021JPCRD..50c3105T. doi:10.1063/5.0064853. ISSN   0047-2689. PMC   9890581 . PMID   36733295.
  27. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, pp. 52–53.
  28. ↑ ALICE Collaboration (October 2019). " and lifetime measurement in Pb–Pb collisions at s NN = 5.02 TeV via two-body decay". Physics Letters B. 797: 134905. arXiv: 1907.06906 . doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134905 . S2CID   204776807.
  29. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 41.
  30. 1 2 Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, pp. 43–45, 59.
  31. ↑ ALICE Collaboration (10 October 2019). "Study of the Λ–Λ interaction with femtoscopy correlations in pp and p–Pb collisions at the LHC". Physics Letters B. 797: 134822. arXiv: 1905.07209 . Bibcode:2019PhLB..79734822A. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134822. ISSN   0370-2693. S2CID   161048820.
  32. ↑ Workman, R L; et al. (Particle Data Group) (8 August 2022). "Review of Particle Physics". Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 2022 (8): 083C01. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptac097 . hdl: 11585/900713 .
  33. 1 2 3 Yoshida, J.; et al. (The J-PARC 07 Collaboration) (25 March 2021). "J-PARC E07: Systematic Study of Double Strangeness System with Hybrid Emulsion Method". Proceedings of the 3rd J-PARC Symposium (J-PARC2019). 33: 011112. Bibcode:2021jprc.confa1112Y. doi: 10.7566/jpscp.33.011112 . ISBN   978-4-89027-146-7. S2CID   233692057.
  34. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 16, 43.
  35. ↑ Iritani, Takumi; et al. (HALQCD Collaboration) (May 2019). "NΩ dibaryon from lattice QCD near the physical point". Physics Letters B. 792: 284–289. arXiv: 1810.03416 . Bibcode:2019PhLB..792..284I. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.050. S2CID   102481007.
  36. ↑ Gongyo, Shinya; et al. (HALQCD Collaboration) (23 May 2018). "Most Strange Dibaryon from Lattice QCD". Physical Review Letters. 120 (21): 212001. arXiv: 1709.00654 . Bibcode:2018PhRvL.120u2001G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.212001. PMID   29883161. S2CID   43958833.
  37. ↑ Zhang, Liang; Zhang, Song; Ma, Yu-Gang (May 2022). "Production of ΩNN and ΩΩN in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions". The European Physical Journal C. 82 (5): 416. arXiv: 2112.02766 . Bibcode:2022EPJC...82..416Z. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10336-7 . S2CID   244908731.
  38. ↑ STAR Collaboration (March 2019). "The proton–Ω correlation function in Au + Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV". Physics Letters B. 790: 490–497. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.055 . hdl: 11368/2940231 . S2CID   127339678.
  39. ↑ "The Most Tightly Bound Nuclei". hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  40. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 43.
  41. 1 2 Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 6–10.
  42. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 49.
  43. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 16.
  44. 1 2 Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, pp. 10–12.
  45. 1 2 Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 12.
  46. ↑ Nakamura, Satoshi N.; Fujii, Yuu; Tsukada, Kyo (2013). "Precision spectroscopy of lambda hypernuclei using electron beams". Nippon Butsuri Gakkai-Shi. 68 (9): 584–592. ISSN   0029-0181.
  47. ↑ Gal, Hungerford & Millener 2016, p. 16,43.
  48. ↑ Tolos & Fabbietti 2020, p. 43.
  49. ↑ Iwasaki, M.; Hayano, R. S.; Ito, T. M.; Nakamura, S. N.; Terada, T. P.; Gill, D. R.; Lee, L.; Olin, A.; Salomon, M.; Yen, S.; Bartlett, K.; Beer, G. A.; Mason, G.; Trayling, G.; Outa, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Seki, R. (21 April 1997). "Observation of Kaonic Hydrogen K α X Rays". Physical Review Letters. 78 (16): 3067–3069. Bibcode:1997PhRvL..78.3067I. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3067.
  50. ↑ Bazzi, M.; Beer, G.; Bombelli, L.; Bragadireanu, A.M.; Cargnelli, M.; Corradi, G.; Curceanu (Petrascu), C.; dʼUffizi, A.; Fiorini, C.; Frizzi, T.; Ghio, F.; Girolami, B.; Guaraldo, C.; Hayano, R.S.; Iliescu, M.; Ishiwatari, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Kienle, P.; Levi Sandri, P.; Longoni, A.; Lucherini, V.; Marton, J.; Okada, S.; Pietreanu, D.; Ponta, T.; Rizzo, A.; Romero Vidal, A.; Scordo, A.; Shi, H.; Sirghi, D.L.; Sirghi, F.; Tatsuno, H.; Tudorache, A.; Tudorache, V.; Vazquez Doce, O.; Widmann, E.; Zmeskal, J. (October 2011). "A new measurement of kaonic hydrogen X-rays". Physics Letters B. 704 (3): 113–117. arXiv: 1105.3090 . Bibcode:2011PhLB..704..113S. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.011. S2CID   118473154.
  51. ↑ Sakuma, F.; et al. (December 2021). "Recent Results and Future Prospects of Kaonic Nuclei at J-PARC". Few-Body Systems. 62 (4): 103. arXiv: 2110.03150 . Bibcode:2021FBS....62..103S. doi:10.1007/s00601-021-01692-3. S2CID   238419423.
  52. ↑ Dover, C. B.; Kahana, S. H. (12 December 1977). "Possibility of Charmed Hypernuclei". Physical Review Letters. 39 (24): 1506–1509. Bibcode:1977PhRvL..39.1506D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1506.
  53. 1 2 3 Krein, Gastão (2019). "Charmed hypernuclei and nuclear-bound charmonia". Central European Symposium on Thermophysics 2019 (Cest). Vol. 2133. p. 020022. doi:10.1063/1.5118390. S2CID   201510645.
  54. ↑ Güven, H.; Bozkurt, K.; Khan, E.; Margueron, J. (10 December 2021). "Ground state properties of charmed hypernuclei within a mean field approach". Physical Review C. 104 (6): 064306. arXiv: 2106.04491 . Bibcode:2021PhRvC.104f4306G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.064306. S2CID   235368356.
  55. ↑ Vidaña, I.; Ramos, A.; Jiménez-Tejero, C. E. (23 April 2019). "Charmed nuclei within a microscopic many-body approach". Physical Review C. 99 (4): 045208. arXiv: 1901.09644 . Bibcode:2019PhRvC..99d5208V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.045208. S2CID   119100085.
  56. ↑ Fontoura, C E; Krmpotić, F; Galeão, A P; Conti, C De; Krein, G (1 January 2018). "Nonmesonic weak decay of charmed hypernuclei". Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. 45 (1): 015101. arXiv: 1711.04579 . Bibcode:2018JPhG...45a5101F. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa982a. S2CID   119184293.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.