Motions of such are usually tabled when the government performed bad in opinion polls, and therefore are regarded as showing discontent of Hongkongers with the governance.[1]
If a motion initiated jointly by one-fourth of all the members of the Legislative Council charges the Chief Executive with serious breach of law or dereliction of duty and if he or she refuses to resign, the Council may, after passing a motion for investigation, give a mandate to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to form and chair an independent investigation committee. The committee shall be responsible for carrying out the investigation and reporting its findings to the Council. If the committee considers the evidence sufficient to substantiate such charges, the Council may pass a motion of impeachment by a two-thirds majority of all its members and report it to the Central People's Government for decision; [...]
The five stages of impeachment, therefore, are:[3][4]
Initiate a motion by one-fourth of MPs charging the Chief Executive with serious breach of law or dereliction of duty;
Carry out investigation by an independent investigation committee;
Pass a motion of impeachment by a two-thirds majority;
Report to the Chinese Government for decision
As of now, only motions for investigation had been tabled, but were all defeated, and thus no impeachment proceedings had been triggered.
No-confidence motions
Legislative Council in meeting
No-confidence motion is non-binding and tabled as members' bill, which requires simple majority from both groups in the Council to pass. As the appointment or removal of Chief Executives and officials are decided by the Chinese Government, such motions would not force any resignation.[5] Nevertheless, no-confidence motions can create political pressure if adopted as the official has lost the support from most of the political parties.[6]
Beijing-backed Hong Kong media had slammed the no-confidence motions as breaching the Basic Law and "contaminating the rule of law", claiming the parliament was not empowered to declare no confidence in anyone.[7]
In 1987, a member of the Hong Kong Basic Law Consultative Committee argued that a further sub-provision reading "a vote of non-confidence against the Chief Executive endorsed by a two-thirds majority of the members of the legislature" should be added to Article 52, and that the Chief Executive could dissolve the legislature if the legislature case a vote of the non-confidence against him, but the Chief Executive would have to resign if the newly-elected legislature again cast a vote of non-confidence against him.[8] The suggestion, however, was not accepted.
List of motions
Only motions against the leader of Hong Kong or the government are listed. Other similar motions are detailed below. denotes impeachment motions.
All no-confidence and impeachment motions were proposed by the pro-democracy camp, and were all defeated in the Legislative Council due to the objection from pro-government and pro-business groups. Cheung Man-kwong is the first legislator to table a motion of no-confidence in 1995, while the first attempt to trigger the impeachment proceedings is by Leung Kwok-hung in 2013.
Colonial Legislative Council
Early in June 1994, the Legislative Council debated the historic motion of censure against Chris Patten, the last Governor of Hong Kong, over his rejection by prerogative to move an amendment over freezing rates. The motion by Szeto Wah of the Democratic Party was adopted with 21 in favour and 11 against.[9]
In July 1995, Patten faced the first no-confidence vote in Hong Kong's history. The motion,[lower-alpha 1] moved by Cheung Man-kwong (Democratic), was in response to the Sino-British Joint Declaration, reached behind closed doors, for a post-handover Court of Final Appeal. The Party argued the British kowtowed to Chinese demands and jeopardised the rule of law by agreeing to a court with powers too watered down to guarantee judicial freedom in Hong Kong.[10]
Patten branded the motion as "empty gesture politics" and as part of the election campaign.[11] Before voting, Anson Chan, the Chief Secretary, denounced the motion, saying passing the motion would mean the Council has lost confidence in Hong Kong's future.[12]
The business lobby, pro-Beijing legislators and most independents voted against the motion or abstained. Allen Lee, leader of the Liberal Party called the motion a waste of time.[10] The motion, along with the amendment proposed by Emily Lau which effectively made it a vote of no-confidence in Beijing and London,[lower-alpha 2] were both defeated.[12]
Prior to the vote and as pressure has mounted on Patten, the Hong Kong Government announced plans to repeal parts of Emergency Regulations Ordinance and enact new regulations to safeguard media freedom. While the passage of the "humiliating" no-confidence measure would not force Patten to resign, it would damage his prestige.[13][10]
Under mounting pressure, Antony Leung resigned in July 2003,[20] while Tung followed in 2005.[21]
4th Legislative Council
In February 2012, Chief Executive Donald Tsang was hit by corruption scandal for allegedly receiving hospitality from business tycoons. Paul Tse from the pro-Beijing bloc floated the idea of impeachment in the same month, but did not gather support from the largest pro-Beijing party DAB, or from democrats who opted for invoking Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance for investigation first.[22]
With the investigation attempt voted down by the pro-Beijing camp, Tanya Chan from Civic Party in April tabled the first no-confidence motion since the handover.[lower-alpha 5][23][24] The pro-Beijing camp continued supporting Tsang and therefore was defeated again, with a margin reduced to 7 in FCs.[25] Chan said the motion was intended as signal to Tsang's successor, Leung Chun-ying, that Hongkongers, civil servants, and lawmakers will be watching him.[23]
On 20 April, more than 20 pro-democracy MPs initiated a motion charging Tsang, but was not debated the legislature as the term of the Legislative Council ended in July.[26] Tsang was charged with corruption in 2015 after he left office, found guilty and jailed in 2017, with the verdict quashed in 2019.
Less than a month later, the first ever impeachment motion was moved by Leung Kwok-hung from League of Social Democrats amid the scandal of illegal structures.[34] Leung Kwok-hung accused the Chief Executive of lying and misleading the public.[35] The motion includes charges laid down against Leung Chun-ying for:[lower-alpha 7][36]
Intentionally giving false statements and answers in this Council in dereliction of the constitutional duty under Articles 60(1) and 64 of the Basic Law to be accountable to this Council as the head of the Government of the HKSAR.
Engaging in a course of conduct in serious breach of Article 47(1) of the Basic Law.
Serious breach of law by culpable misconduct in public office in directing, causing, authorizing or permitting the Office of the Chief Executive-elect to make false and/or misleading statements in response to public inquiry.
The motion was once again defeated in the indirectly elected functional constituencies despite securing a simple majority in directly elected seats.[37]
In October 2013, another no-confidence vote,[lower-alpha 8] by Kwok Ka-ki (Civic) accusing Leung Chun-ying for "tearing apart the society", was defeated.[38] The government by then was hit by multiple scandals and under public pressure amid the rejection of HKTV's TV licence application and the aftermath of Manila hostage crisis and of Lamma Island ferry collision.[39]
6th Legislative Council
In the last months of Leung's tenure, Alvin Yeung (Civic) tabled impeachment motion[lower-alpha 9] for "contempt of the Legislative Council by improperly interfering with the affairs of the Select Committee of this Council in dereliction of his constitutional duty as the head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region under Articles 47, 60 and 64 of the Basic Law", in response to alleged meddling in the Council's probe on Leung–UGL agreement. The investigation motion did not pass the required threshold.[40][41]
On 12 July 2018, the Council voted down a motion of no-confidence against President of the Council, Andrew Leung,[42][43] whom Joseph Lee (Ind.), the proposer, accused of cloture on important matters.[44]
In early 2019, the popularity of Carrie Lam's government had dropped to an all-time low due to controversies of the extradition bill. Andrew Wan (Democratic) proposed a no-confidence motion for manifesto breach, disqualifying MPs, co-location arrangement of West Kowloon station, "politically-motivated cases", and other issues. Claudia Mo from HK First tabled an amendment that explicitly states the extradition bill as the main reason.[45] For the first time, the no-confidence motion, along with the amendment, were defeated in both GCs and FCs.[46][47]Luk Chung-hung became the first pro-Beijing MP voting for no-confidence motion after "accidentally" casting the vote, who apologised for the mistake.[48]
Dennis Kwok (Civic) further proposed a no-confidence motion on the whole government,[lower-alpha 10][49] which Claudia Mo moved an amendment,[lower-alpha 11][50] but was not debated as parliament term expired.
Following violent scenes in protest later the year, the Council in December 2019 debated another impeachment motion against Carrie Lam,[lower-alpha 12] with charges of:[51][52]
Disregard of mainstream opposing views and unrelentingly pushing through a highly controversial bill
Use of excessive force to crack down on peaceful assembly
Intimidating protestors with disproportionate criminal charges
Causing a rift in society
The motion, proposed in June but delayed due to storming by protestors, was defeated as expected,[53] but with a smaller margin than in May.
↑ The motion reads: That as the British Administration in Hong Kong has seriously damaged the future rule of law in Hong Kong, this Council expresses no confidence in Mr Christopher PATTEN, the Governor of Hong Kong.
↑ The motion as amended reads: The motion reads: That as the British and Chinese Governments have seriously damaged the future rule of law in Hong Kong, this Council expresses no confidence in them.
↑ The motion reads: That this Council calls for the resignation of the Chief Executive, Mr TUNG Chee-hwa.
↑ The motion reads: That, as there has been retrogression in human rights, the rule of law and economic development in Hong Kong and democratization of the political system has remained stagnant under the administration of the Chief Executive Mr TUNG Chee-hwa, prompting the public to make repeated demands for him to step down, this Council calls on Mr TUNG to take the responsibility and resign in accordance with the wishes of the people.
↑ The motion reads: That this Council has no confidence in the Chief Executive, Mr Donald TSANG.
↑ The motion reads: That this Council has no confidence in the Chief Executive, Mr LEUNG Chun-ying.
↑ Excerpt of the motion reads: Whereas not less than one-fourth of all the Members of this Council have jointly initiated this motion charging the Chief Executive Mr LEUNG Chun Ying with serious breaches of law and/or dereliction of duty (as particularized in the Schedule and Annexes appended to this motion); and whereas the said Mr LEUNG Chun Ying has refused to resign within a reasonable time, this Council, in accordance with Article 73(9) of the Basic Law, hereby gives a mandate to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to form and chair an independent investigation committee to investigate the alleged serious breaches of law and/or dereliction of duty and report its findings to this Council.
↑ The motion reads: That this Council has no confidence in the Chief Executive, Mr LEUNG Chun-ying.
↑ Excerpt of the motion reads: Wheresa not less than one-fourth of all the Members of this Council have jointly initiated this motion charging the Chief Executive Mr LEUNG Chun-ying with serious breach of law and/or dereliction of duty (as particularized in the Schedule and Annex appended to this motion), and whereas the said Mr LEUNG Chun-ying has refused to resign within a reasonable time, this Council, in accordance with Article 73(9) of the Basic Law, hereby gives a mandate to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to form and chair an independent investigation committee to investigate the alleged serious breaches of law and/or dereliction of duty and report its findings to this Council.
↑ The motion reads: That this Council has no confidence in the Fifth Term Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
↑ The motion as amended reads: That the Fifth Term Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (‘the Fifth Term SAR Government’) has failed to command public support for a number of policies and in particular, it has acted ineptly and indecisively in handling the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 (‘the Bill’), and even bypassed the normal procedures of scrutinizing the Bill by the Bills Committee and demanded that the Second Reading debate on the Bill be resumed at a Legislative Council meeting; the Fifth Term SAR Government has administered Hong Kong with executive hegemony and incessantly damaged the rule of law and the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature of Hong Kong, resulting in its failure to govern Hong Kong effectively and uphold the civil rights and well-being of Hong Kong people; in this connection, this Council has no confidence in the Fifth Term SAR Government.
↑ Excerpt of the motion reads: Whereas not less than one-fourth of all Members of this Council have jointly initiated this motion charging the Chief Executive Mrs Carrie LAM CHENG Yuet-ngor with serious breach of law and/or dereliction of duty (as particularized in the Schedule to this motion), and whereas the said Mrs Carrie LAM CHENG Yuet-ngor has refused to resign within a reasonable time, this Council, in accordance with Article 73(9) of the Basic Law, hereby gives a mandate to the Chief Justice of the Court to form and chair an independent investigation committee to investigate the alleged serious breaches of law and/or dereliction of duty and report its findings to this Council.
Related Research Articles
The Liberal Party (LP) is a pro-Beijing, pro-business, and conservative political party in Hong Kong. Led by Tommy Cheung and chaired by Peter Shiu, it holds four seats in the Legislative Council, and holds five seats in the District Councils.
The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is the representative of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and head of the Government of Hong Kong. The position was created to replace the office of governor of Hong Kong, the representative of the monarch of the United Kingdom during British rule. The office, stipulated by the Hong Kong Basic Law, formally came into being on 1 July 1997 with the handover of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China.
Sir Donald Tsang Yam-kuen is a former Hong Kong civil servant who served as the second Chief Executive of Hong Kong from 2005 to 2012.
Jasper Tsang Yok-sing is a Hong Kong politician. He is the founding member of the largest pro-Beijing party the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) from 1992 to 2003 and the 2nd President of the Legislative Council from 2008 to 2016.
The Democratic Party (DP) is a centre-left liberal political party in Hong Kong. Chaired by Lo Kin-hei, it is the flagship party in the pro-democracy camp and currently has 7 elected representatives in the District Councils.
James Tien Pei-chun, GBS, OBE, JP is the former chairman and Leader of the Liberal Party (LP) and former member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (Legco). Coming from the background of an entrepreneur, he was also a non-official member of the Executive Council of Hong Kong (Exco), member of Central and Western and Kwai Tsing District Council and Hong Kong member to the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).
Policy Address is the annual address by the Chief Executive of Hong Kong. The practice of giving annual policy address is mandated under Article 64 of the Basic Law, requiring the government to "present regular policy addresses to the Council".
Leung Chun-ying, also known as CY Leung, is a Hong Kong politician and chartered surveyor, who has served as vice-chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference since March 2017. He was previously the third Chief Executive of Hong Kong between 2012 and 2017.
Maria Tam Wai-chu is a senior Hong Kong politician and lawyer. She is a member of the Committee for the Basic Law of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) since 1997 and the chairman of the Operations Review Committee of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) since 2015.
The League of Social Democrats (LSD) is a social democratic party in Hong Kong. Chaired by Chan Po-ying, wife of Leung Kwok-hung, it positions itself as the radical wing of the pro-democracy camp and stresses on "street actions" and "parliamentary struggles". It currently holds two seats in the District Councils.
The 2012 Hong Kong Chief Executive election was held on 25 March 2012 to select the Chief Executive of Hong Kong (CE), the highest office in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), by a 1,193-member Election Committee (EC) to replace the incumbent Chief Executive. Won by the former non-official convener of the Executive Council of Hong Kong Leung Chun-ying, the election was the most competitive as it was the first election with more than one pro-Beijing candidate since 1996 election.
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Basic Law Consultative Committee was an official body established in 1985 to canvass views in Hong Kong on the drafts of the Hong Kong Basic Law.
Yiu Si-wing BBS is a director at China Travel Service and a former member of Legislative Council of Hong Kong.
The Fifth Legislative Council of Hong Kong was the fifth meeting of the legislative branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. The membership of the LegCo is based on the 2012 election. The term of the session is from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2016, during the term in office of the Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying. Due to the new arrangements agreed in a contentious LegCo vote in 2010, the session consists of the new total of 70 seats in LegCo, ten more than previously, with 35 members elected in geographical constituencies through direct elections, and 35 members in functional constituencies, in which five District Council (Second) functional constituency seats each represent all 18 District councils of Hong Kong voted for by all resident voters in Hong Kong. The Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong remained the largest party while the pan-democrats secured the one-third crucial minority. Notable new members of the LegCo members include Gary Fan from the new established party Neo Democrats and first openly gay councillor, People Power's Ray Chan Chi-chuen.
The 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election was held on 26 March 2017 for the 5th term of the Chief Executive of Hong Kong (CE), the highest office of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Former Chief Secretary for Administration Carrie Lam beat former Financial Secretary John Tsang and retired judge Woo Kwok-hing, receiving 777 votes from the 1,194-member Election Committee.
The Second term of Tung Chee-hwa as Chief Executive of Hong Kong, or Tung administration, officially considered part of "The 2nd term Chief Executive of Hong Kong", relates to the period of governance of Hong Kong since the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong, between 1 July 2002 and 12 March 2005 until Tung Chee-hwa resigned from the office and the rest of the term was taken up by former Chief Secretary for Administration Donald Tsang.
The First term of Tung Chee-hwa as Chief Executive of Hong Kong, officially considered part of "The 1st term Chief Executive of Hong Kong", relates to the period of governance of Hong Kong since the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong, between 1 July 1997 and 30 June 2002. Tung Chee-hwa was elected in 1996 by 400-member Selection Committee as the first Chief Executive of Hong Kong.
Conservatism has deep roots in Hong Kong politics and society. As a political trend, it is often reflected in but not limited to the current pro-Beijing camp, one of the two major political forces in Hong Kong, as opposed to liberalism, a dominant feature of the pro-democracy camp. It has also become a political view taken by some localist political parties.
In October 2014, it was reported that Leung Chun-ying, Chief Executive of Hong Kong, had signed an agreement in 2011 with UGL Limited, an Australian engineering firm, in relation to its takeover of DTZ Holdings, a UK-listed real estate services company in which Leung was the director of the company. In agreement, UGL undertook to pay Leung £4 million in two instalments in 2012 and 2013 respectively, subject to specific conditions. As these payments concurred with the term of office of Leung Chun-ying as Chief Executive between 2012 and 2017, it has aroused concerns of the public in respect of the nature of payment, potential conflict of interests, relevant systems of declaration of interests and taxation implications.
An impeachment investigation is an investigation or inquiry which takes place in relation to an impeachment or potential impeachment.
References
↑ Chung, Robert. "特區二十週年系列 7：彈劾特首". Citizen News (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-08-12. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
