Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships

Last updated March 10, 2024

The Initial IMO Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships, or Initial IMO GHG Strategy, is the framework through which the International Maritime Organization (IMO) aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from international maritime shipping. GHG emissions from shipping are about 3% of total GHG emissions, and under this strategy the IMO envisions their elimination within this century. However many companies and organizations say shipping should be decarbonized by 2050.

International shipping was not covered by the 2015 Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit climate change. With emissions from shipping expected to increase both in absolute and relative terms, there was pressure on the IMO to take action. In 2016, an agreement was reached to develop a strategy, which culminated in the adoption of the initial strategy in 2018. This is seen as a first step, with a revised strategy expected in 2023.

While the policy of the IMO, the strategy is not legally binding upon members. It suggests a variety of measures which can be adopted along different time frames for member states to adopt. The strategy also envisions cooperation through which more developed countries can support those less able to adapt.

Background and development

While the topic was discussed at the Paris Conference, international maritime shipping, along with international civil aviation, was not covered by the 2015 Paris Agreement.^[1]^: 134 These emissions are difficult to attribute, as the "flag state" (where a ship is registered), owner, crew, and ports of call can all be different countries.^[2] In addition to carbon dioxide, ships emit short-lived climate forcers such as black carbon and sulfur dioxide, as well as NOx. Understanding of how these interact is poor, making it difficult to fully assess the impact of shipping on climate change.^[3]^: 14–15 Nonetheless, shipping is already the most efficient way to transport goods.^[1]^: 134

Under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, responsibility for the regulation of shipping emissions was assigned to the International Maritime Organization (IMO).^[2] (This was not replicated in the Paris Agreement, which did not allocate responsibility for international transport emissions.^[4] In July 2007, the IMO began discussing potential market-based mechanisms. In 2009, the EU said shipping should aim to cut emissions by 20% compared to 2005 levels by 2020. In January 2010, Norway proposed potential targets intended to put shipping in line with expectations for other economic sectors. While no targets of^{[ clarification needed ]} market-based mechanisms were adopted following these proposals, in 2011 the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) was adopted. This implemented a set of energy efficiency standards for ships built after 2013. The same year, the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan was adopted, which required ship energy efficiency to be monitored.^[3]^: 17 These were included in Annex VI of MARPOL 73/78. That the new regulations would apply equally to all countries regardless of economic development was a source of dispute relating to the principles of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and No More Favourable Treatment. This meant they were passed by majority, rather than the usual consensus process. The EEDI has been expanded and clarified since its first implementation.^[1]^{: 136–137} While there were some efficiency improvements due to the EEDI and general economic incentives to improve efficiency,^[3]^: 17 little significant action was taken by the IMO, in part due to disputes between companies from developing and developed nations.^[5] In 2012, international maritime transport made up 2.2% of global emissions.^[3]^: 9

In 2014, the IMO calculated that the shipping industry produced 3.1% of all CO₂ emissions,^[4] and that shipping emissions would rise as much as 250% by 2050,^[3]^: 17 at which point they could make up 17% of all emissions.^[5] In May 2015 a proposal by the Marshall Islands to create an emissions target was discussed by the IMO, but no agreement was reached.^[3]^: 18 In September 2015, the IMO Secretary-General argued against an emissions cap, stating that it would harm economic growth. By 2016, regulations were in place that would apply carbon efficiency standards to newly built ships beginning in 2019, but these would not be retroactive to existing ships.^[5] In November 2015, the European Union published an analysis suggesting that although complete decarbonisation by 2050 was unrealistic, annual emissions would have to end up lower than the expected 2020 emissions by that time to meet the Paris Agreement goal of temperatures rising no more than 2 °C.^[3]^: 9

In April 2016, the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) agreed only that ships weighing 5,000 tons or more should submit fuel use data. Stronger measures had been supported by the European Union, Liberia, and the Marshall Islands, (the latter being two of the three largest flag states): opposition was led by Brazil, China, India, Russia, and the third of the three largest flag states, Panama. At this time, pressure on the IMO was increasing, especially as the aviation industry was moving towards establishing an emissions cap. Some large shipping companies supported IMO action, fearing external action bypassing the IMO if none was taken (the aviation agreement followed an agreement that the European Union would withdraw a plan to add a carbon price to incoming flights).^[5] Previously a 2013 EU proposal for the monitoring the emissions of ships entering EU ports that was adopted in late 2014^[3]^: 17 stimulated an IMO agreement to develop a data collection system. Fuel consumption reporting was added to MARPOL in October 2016, coming into force in March 2018.^[1]^{: 140–141} A number of countries submitted Nationally Determined Contributions which pledged whole economy reductions, including a reduction of emissions per unit of GDP. Shipping contributes to GDP, and so is indirectly covered by these pledges.^[4]

In October 2016, the MEPC agreed on a roadmap to develop a strategy for emissions reduction. Following its development, it was approved by the MEPC in April 2018. During this approval, the IMO also agreed to revise this strategy by Spring of 2023.^[1]^: 135 The initial strategy was adopted by majority rather than consensus. There were disputes about whether decarbonisation should occur in the first or second half of the 21st century.^[1]^: 142 There was also debate on whether the treaty should have quantifiable targets. The agreement on quantifiable targets happened in part due to the idea that a target provided better certainty, an argument advanced by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands.^[1]^: 143

The IMO strategy as passed is explicitly constructed with reference to the Paris Agreement. It sets an overall framework for future development, but is not legally binding.^[1]^: 142 Within the overall aim of decarbonisation there are smaller targets for different time periods, which use 2008 as a baseline year. Emissions intensity (the emissions produced to transport unit goods per unit distance) is targeted to drop 40% by 2030, with the aim of "pursuing efforts towards 70% by 2050". At the same time, the overall emissions are expected to peak "as soon as possible", alongside a specific target of "at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008".^[1]^{: 143–144}

Along with setting an overall vision and general principles, the IMO strategy also includes different suggested measures that can be taken to reduce emissions.^[1]^: 135 These are classified as short-term (applying from 2018-2023), medium-term (2023-2030), and long-term (2030 onwards). To meet the short term goals, it is thought there will need to be rapid adoption of technical (e.g. new ship standards under the EEDI) and operational (e.g. ship speed reduction) changes, as well as the creation of implementation and enforcement mechanisms for the strategy.^[1]^: 148 To achieve the stated long-term targets, it is expected that the industry will have to power ships with hydrogen, ammonia ^[7] or biofuels (but shipping may be outbid by aviation biofuels),^[8] and develop new more efficient propulsion technology.^[1]^: 144

The strategy envisions significant capacity building and technical cooperation between IMO states, in order to support Least Developed Countries and Small Island Developing States.^[1]^: 139 While the measures and targets apply to all ships, the Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and No More Favourable Treatment principles were referenced in regards to the implementation of these measures. While there is no detail on how exactly these sometimes conflicting principles would apply in practice, eight criteria were identified that should be taken into consideration when identifying responsibilities: remoteness and connectivity, the type of cargo, the country’s dependence on transport, the costs of transport, food security, disaster response, cost-effectiveness, and level of development. To assess these for each situation, the MEPC has developed a process which cites the principles of simplicity, inclusiveness, transparency, flexibility, an evidenced-based approach, and measure-specific consideration. To facilitate implementation in less developed countries, in July 2019 the IMO established a fund supplied through voluntary donations to support capacity building and technical cooperation.^[1]^{: 145–147} Changes in the shipping sector are envisioned as occurring alongside changes in the port sector, which for example would need to adapt to provide onshore power and alternative fuels.^[1]^: 149

Implementation

Following approval of the strategy, the MEPC adopted eight follow-up programs to be implemented before 2023. Three of these focused on potential short-term actions, including those already regulated by the IMO. One program was to develop a fourth IMO GHG study, focused on the period from 2012-2018, to help inform the 2023 revision of the strategy.^[6]^: 2

While market-based mechanisms have been repeatedly discussed in MEPC meetings, strong opposition to their use has meant there has been no agreement on their use. Reasons raised in opposition include providing an advantage to developed economies, and potential incompatibility with World Trade Organization rules.^[1]^{: 149–150} One possible market-based mechanism would be a carbon tax charged on ships weighing over 5000 tonnes,^[9] to help fund bunkering for cleaner fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia.^[10] The European Union designed a Regional Emissions Trading System, to be put into effect if it was felt the IMO did not move far enough.^[6]^: 4 In September 2020, it was decided that maritime transport would be included in the European Union Emissions Trading System from 2022.^[11] Many companies and organizations say shipping should be decarbonized by 2050.^[12]

Related Research Articles

The International Maritime Organization is a specialised agency of the United Nations responsible for regulating shipping. The IMO was established following agreement at a UN conference held in Geneva in 1948 and the IMO came into existence ten years later, meeting for the first time on 17 March 1958. Headquartered in London, United Kingdom, IMO currently has 176 Member States and three Associate Members.

The Kyoto Protocol (Japanese: 京都議定書, Hepburn: Kyōto Giteisho) was an international treaty which extended the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits state parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and that human-made CO₂ emissions are driving it. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997 and entered into force on 16 February 2005. There were 192 parties (Canada withdrew from the protocol, effective December 2012) to the Protocol in 2020.

Environmental finance is a field within finance that employs market-based environmental policy instruments to improve the ecological impact of investment strategies. The primary objective of environmental finance is to regress the negative impacts of climate change through pricing and trading schemes. The field of environmental finance was established in response to the poor management of economic crises by government bodies globally. Environmental finance aims to reallocate a businesses resources to improve the sustainability of investments whilst also retaining profit margins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon footprint</span> Concept to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from activities or products

A carbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) is a calculated value or index that makes it possible to compare the total amount of greenhouse gases that an activity, product, company or country adds to the atmosphere. Carbon footprints are usually reported in tonnes of emissions (CO₂-equivalent) per unit of comparison. Such units can be for example tonnes CO₂-eq per year, per kilogram of protein for consumption, per kilometer travelled, per piece of clothing and so forth. A product's carbon footprint includes the emissions for the entire life cycle. These run from the production along the supply chain to its final consumption and disposal.

Carbon offsetting is a trading mechanism that allows entities such as governments, individuals, or businesses to compensate for (i.e. “offset”) their greenhouse gas emissions by supporting projects that reduce, avoid, or remove emissions elsewhere. In other words, carbon offsets focus on offsetting emissions through investments in emission reduction projects. When an entity invests in a carbon offsetting program, it receives carbon credits, i.e "tokens" used to account for net climate benefits from one entity to another. A carbon credit or offset credit can be bought or sold after certification by a government or independent certification body. One carbon offset or credit represents a reduction, avoidance or removal of one tonne of carbon dioxide or its carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO₂e).

Carbon accounting is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas (GHG) an organization emits. It can also be used to track projects or actions to reduce emissions in sectors such as forestry or renewable energy. Corporations, cities and other groups use these techniques to help limit climate change. Organizations will often set an emissions baseline, create targets for reducing emissions, and track progress towards them. The accounting methods enable them to do this in a more consistent and transparent manner.

Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, raising environmental concerns over their global effects and their effects on local air quality. Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide, the best understood greenhouse gas, and, with less scientific understanding, nitrogen oxides, contrails and particulates. Their radiative forcing is estimated at 1.3–1.4 that of CO₂ alone, excluding induced cirrus cloud with a very low level of scientific understanding. In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO₂ emissions.

The Climate Change Committee (CCC), originally named the Committee on Climate Change, is an independent non-departmental public body, formed under the Climate Change Act (2008) to advise the United Kingdom and devolved Governments and Parliaments on tackling and preparing for climate change. The Committee provides advice on setting carbon budgets, and reports regularly to the Parliaments and Assemblies on the progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Notably, in 2019 the CCC recommended the adoption of a target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by the United Kingdom by 2050. On 27 June 2019 the British Parliament amended the Climate Change Act (2008) to include a commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. The CCC also advises and comments on the UK's progress on climate change adaptation through updates to Parliament.

The environmental effects of shipping include air pollution, water pollution, acoustic, and oil pollution. Ships are responsible for more than 18% of nitrogen oxides pollution, and 3% of greenhouse gas emissions.

The environmental effects of transport are significant because transport is a major user of energy, and burns most of the world's petroleum. This creates air pollution, including nitrous oxides and particulates, and is a significant contributor to global warming through emission of carbon dioxide. Within the transport sector, road transport is the largest contributor to global warming.

In 2021, net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United Kingdom (UK) were 427 million tonnes (Mt) carbon dioxide equivalent, 80% of which was carbon dioxide itself. Emissions increased by 5% in 2021 with the easing of COVID-19 restrictions, primarily due to the extra road transport. The UK has over time emitted about 3% of the world total human caused CO₂, with a current rate under 1%, although the population is less than 1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris Agreement</span> 2015 international treaty on climate change

The Paris Agreement, often referred to as the Paris Accords or the Paris Climate Accords, is an international treaty on climate change. Adopted in 2015, the agreement covers climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. The Paris Agreement was negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference near Paris, France. As of February 2023, 195 members of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are parties to the agreement. Of the three UNFCCC member states which have not ratified the agreement, the only major emitter is Iran. The United States withdrew from the agreement in 2020, but rejoined in 2021.

Climate change has resulted in an increase in temperature of 2.3 °C (2022) in Europe compared to pre-industrial levels. Europe is the fastest warming continent in the world. Europe's climate is getting warmer due to anthropogenic activity. According to international climate experts, global temperature rise should not exceed 2 °C to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change; without reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, this could happen before 2050. Climate change has implications for all regions of Europe, with the extent and nature of impacts varying across the continent.

Emission control areas (ECAs), or sulfur emission control areas (SECAs), are sea areas in which stricter controls were established to minimize airborne emissions from ships as defined by Annex VI of the 1997 MARPOL Protocol.

The German Climate Action Plan 2050 is a climate protection policy document approved by the German government on 14 November 2016. The plan outlines measures by which Germany can meet its various national greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals through to 2050 and service its international commitments under the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB), under minister Barbara Hendricks, led the development of the plan. The plan was progressively watered down since a draft was first leaked in early May 2016. Projections from the environment ministry in September 2016 indicate that Germany will likely miss its 2020 climate target.

Climate change is leading to long-term impacts on agriculture in Germany, more intense heatwaves and coldwaves, flash and coastal flooding, and reduced water availability. Debates over how to address these long-term challenges caused by climate change have also sparked changes in the energy sector and in mitigation strategies. Germany's energiewende has been a significant political issue in German politics that has made coalition talks difficult for Angela Merkel's CDU.

The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) is a carbon offset and carbon reduction scheme to lower CO₂ emissions for international flights, to curb the aviation impact on climate change.

Coal, cars and lorries vent more than a third of Turkey's six hundred million tonnes of annual greenhouse gas emissions, which are mostly carbon dioxide and part of the cause of climate change in Turkey. The nation's coal-fired power stations emit the most carbon dioxide, and other significant sources are road vehicles running on petrol or diesel. After coal and oil the third most polluting fuel is fossil gas; which is burnt in Turkey's gas-fired power stations, homes and workplaces. Much methane is belched by livestock; cows alone produce half of the greenhouse gas from agriculture in Turkey.

Heavy fuel oil (HFO) is a category of fuel oils of a tar-like consistency. Also known as bunker fuel, or residual fuel oil, HFO is the result or remnant from the distillation and cracking process of petroleum. For this reason, HFO is contaminated with several different compounds including aromatics, sulfur, and nitrogen, making emissions upon combustion more polluting compared to other fuel oils. HFO is predominantly used as a fuel source for marine vessel propulsion using marine diesel engines due to its relatively low cost compared to cleaner fuel sources such as distillates. The use and carriage of HFO on-board vessels presents several environmental concerns, namely the risk of oil spill and the emission of toxic compounds and particulates including black carbon. The use of HFOs is banned as a fuel source for ships travelling in the Antarctic as part of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code). For similar reasons, an HFO ban in Arctic waters is currently being considered.

The decarbonization of shipping is an ongoing goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from shipping to net-zero by or around 2050, which is the goal of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The IMO has an initial strategy. This includes the practice of lowering or limiting the combustion of fossil fuels for power and propulsion to limit emission of carbon dioxide.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Kopela, Sophia (25 December 2020). "Climate Change and the International Maritime Organization". In McDonald, Jan; McGee, Jeffrey; Barnes, Richard (eds.). Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781788112239.
1 2 Hulac, Benjamin (14 December 2015). "Pollution from Planes and Ships Left Out of Paris Agreement". Scientific American. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping" (PDF). European Parliament. November 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
1 2 3 Murphy, Andrew (19 May 2020). "Inclusion of international aviation emissions under the Paris Agreement's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)". In Fichert, Frank; Forsyth, Peter; Niemeier, Hans-Martin (eds.). Aviation and Climate Change: Economic Perspectives on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policies. Routledge. ISBN 9781317165125.
1 2 3 4 Pearce, Fred (19 May 2016). "After Paris, A Move to Rein In Emissions by Ships and Planes". Yale School of the Environment. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
1 2 3 Tae-Hwan Joung; Seong-Gil Kang; Jong-Kap Lee; Junkeon Ahn (11 January 2020). "The IMO initial strategy for reducing Greenhouse Gas(GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050". Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping. 4 (1): 1–7. Bibcode:2020JIMSE...4....1J. doi: 10.1080/25725084.2019.1707938 .
↑ Manager, Decarbonisation Programme. "Decarbonising shipping – could ammonia be the fuel of the future?". Lloyd's Register. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
↑ "Biofuels for the marine shipping sector | Bioenergy". December 2017. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
↑ "The Shipping Industry Wants to Be Taxed for Its Carbon Emissions". Bloomberg.com. 2021-04-20. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
↑ "Shipping industry proposes levy to speed up zero carbon future". www.cnbctv18.com. 2021-09-06. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
↑ Carioua, Pierre; Lindstad, Elizabeth; Jia, Haiying (October 2021). "The impact of an EU maritime emissions trading system on oil trades". Transportation Research. 99: 102992. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102992 .
↑ "Top global companies call for zero emissions shipping by 2050". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

External links

"Initial IMO GHG Strategy". International Maritime Organization.
"ROADMAP FOR DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE IMO STRATEGY ON REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS, MEPC 70/18/Add.1" (PDF). International Maritime Organization. October 2016.
"UN body adopts climate change strategy for shipping". International Maritime Organization. 13 April 2018.
"ADOPTION OF THE INITIAL IMO STRATEGY ON REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS AND EXISTING IMO ACTIVITY RELATED TO REDUCING GHG EMISSIONS IN THE SHIPPING SECTOR, RESOLUTION MEPC.304(72)" (PDF). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 13 April 2018.
"Third IMO GHG Study 2014". International Maritime Organization. 2015.
"Fourth Greenhouse Gas Study 2020". International Maritime Organization. 2020.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Kopela2020-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Kopela, Sophia (25 December 2020). "Climate Change and the International Maritime Organization". In McDonald, Jan; McGee, Jeffrey; Barnes, Richard (eds.). Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781788112239.

[Hulac2015-2] 1 2 Hulac, Benjamin (14 December 2015). "Pollution from Planes and Ships Left Out of Paris Agreement". Scientific American. Retrieved 12 September 2021.

[EU2015-3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping" (PDF). European Parliament. November 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2021.

[Murphy2020-4] 1 2 3 Murphy, Andrew (19 May 2020). "Inclusion of international aviation emissions under the Paris Agreement's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)". In Fichert, Frank; Forsyth, Peter; Niemeier, Hans-Martin (eds.). Aviation and Climate Change: Economic Perspectives on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policies. Routledge. ISBN 9781317165125.

[Pearce2016-5] 1 2 3 4 Pearce, Fred (19 May 2016). "After Paris, A Move to Rein In Emissions by Ships and Planes". Yale School of the Environment. Retrieved 12 September 2021.

[Joung2020-6] 1 2 3 Tae-Hwan Joung; Seong-Gil Kang; Jong-Kap Lee; Junkeon Ahn (11 January 2020). "The IMO initial strategy for reducing Greenhouse Gas(GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050". Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping. 4 (1): 1–7. Bibcode:2020JIMSE...4....1J. doi: 10.1080/25725084.2019.1707938 .

[7] Manager, Decarbonisation Programme. "Decarbonising shipping – could ammonia be the fuel of the future?". Lloyd's Register. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

[8] "Biofuels for the marine shipping sector | Bioenergy". December 2017. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

[9] "The Shipping Industry Wants to Be Taxed for Its Carbon Emissions". Bloomberg.com. 2021-04-20. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

[10] "Shipping industry proposes levy to speed up zero carbon future". www.cnbctv18.com. 2021-09-06. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

[11] Carioua, Pierre; Lindstad, Elizabeth; Jia, Haiying (October 2021). "The impact of an EU maritime emissions trading system on oil trades". Transportation Research. 99: 102992. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102992 .

[12] "Top global companies call for zero emissions shipping by 2050". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 2021-09-30.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]