Intellectual property analytics (commonly IP analytics) is the systematic analysis of data from intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights, geographical indications, and trade secrets to produce actionable insights for policy makers, businesses, researchers and legal practitioners. [1] Originating in patent analytics, the field has expanded to integrate multiple IP domains and combines rigorous data preparation with techniques such as bibliometrics, text mining, machine learning, geospatial mapping and visualization to create technology landscapes, monitor brand activity, assess portfolios and inform policy. [2] Typical workflows progress from project scoping through data acquisition, cleaning and normalization to analysis, storytelling and dissemination, using both public and commercial databases and tools. Some advances in artificial intelligence have broadened analytical capabilities while raising legal and ethical questions about authorship, inventorship and liability, driving evolving methodological standards and regulatory debate.
The emergence of IP analytics as a distinct field has been driven in part by the unprecedented availability of machine-readable data from global IP offices, scholarly databases, and open source tools. [3] [4] According to WIPO’s Patent Analytics Handbook, [5] patent analytics now routinely involves scientific literature integration, text mining, machine learning, and geographic mapping for strategic insight generation. [6] The field has evolved from early spreadsheet analyses to sophisticated pipelines that leverage APIs, geocoding, and AI for technology mapping and forecasting, [2] [7] [8] including automated systems for patent document summarization using natural language processing and machine learning for enhanced knowledge management. [9]
As reported in IP Facts and Figures 2024, [10] global filings for patents, trademarks, and industrial designs reached new highs in 2023—with over 3.5 million patent applications, 1.52 million industrial designs, and roughly 15 million trademark class based filings—demonstrating the scale of IP activity now available for analytics. This vast data resource is now exploited via tools like the USPTO’s PatentsView, [11] which links and disambiguates inventors, organizations, and filings, and applies algorithms—such as gender attribution—to enrich analytical capacity.
Academic literature has chronicled the growing convergence of patent landscape analysis with data science and AI methods. [12] [2] Patent analytics is now understood to encompass not only counts and citation graphs, but also semantic clustering, named entity recognition, and predictive modeling, as described in peer-reviewed studies.
While the initial focus of IP analytics was on patents, recent developments in trademark and design analytics—arguably driven by similar data intensive techniques—underscore a broader shift toward integrated analysis across IP rights. [13] This expansion enables strategic comparisons across patent, trademark, industrial design, and other IP domains for portfolio management, commercialization strategy, and policy formulation. [14] While offering immense opportunities for advanced analytics, the rapid emergence of generative AI also presents complex challenges to traditional intellectual property notions of authorship, inventorship, and infringement liability, necessitating evolving legal and ethical frameworks. [15]
Patent analytics is a specialized domain within IP analytics that extracts insights from patent documents to inform decisions in research and development, technology management, policymaking, and competitive intelligence. [14] A patent contains structured information such as technical disclosures, legal claims, bibliographic data (inventors, applicants, jurisdictions), classifications, and citation relationships. Because patents are often filed before commercial products are launched, they serve as early indicators of innovation trajectories. [16]
Patent analytics supports:
Patent data can be accessed through open platforms such as WIPO's PATENTSCOPE, EPO's Espacenet, and the USPTO bulk data portal. For large-scale analysis, EPO’s PATSTAT offers structured data exports compatible with statistical software. Commercial platforms like Derwent Innovation, Orbit Intelligence, and Lens.org offer enhanced search, normalization, and visualization capabilities.
Analytical techniques in patent studies include:
Recent research emphasizes integrating patent analytics with scientific publication data, market data, and standards to build multi-dimensional technology intelligence systems. [21] Patent analytics also plays a critical role in sustainability assessments, pharmaceutical innovation, green technologies, and artificial intelligence trend monitoring, as evidenced by major reports on innovation in clean energy technologies, and through specific patent analyses leveraging AI to identify climate change mitigation trends. [26] [27] The field further offers critical insights into global trends in biotechnology innovation, often revealing significant growth and emerging frontiers in areas like genetic engineering and AI-integrated biotech tools. [28] [29]
Trademark analytics examines trademark registrations and applications to gain insights into branding strategies, market dynamics, and product trends. [13] WIPO's Global Brand Database and annual World Intellectual Property Indicators reports provide large-scale trademark data across Nice classifications, jurisdictions, and time periods.
Trademark analytics can be used to:
The increase in cross-border commerce and e-commerce platforms has enhanced the strategic use of trademark data for global brand monitoring.[ citation needed ]
Industrial design analytics focuses on the appearance of products, as protected under registered designs. It relies on visual and classification data derived from systems such as the Hague System and the Locarno Classification. WIPO's Global Design Database facilitates international and regional design searches.
Applications include:
Design analytics remains more specialized due to the visual nature of data and limitations in text-based querying. [31] Nonetheless, design filing trends provide valuable insight into innovation in product form and appearance. Recent methodological advances are beginning to overcome data challenges, using computer vision and AI to enable large-scale analysis of design aesthetics and trends, including deep learning techniques for image-based trademark similarity detection, and artificial intelligence is also increasingly shaping the entire industrial design process, from concept generation to optimization, presenting both significant opportunities and new challenges.[ citation needed ]
IP analytics may also extend to other forms of protection, such as geographical indications (GIs), plant variety protections, or copyright registrations where available. For instance, WIPO's Lisbon System and annual IP statistics include GI filings, while plant variety databases offer insight into agricultural innovation. However, these forms are less standardized globally, and lack the robust analytical infrastructure of patents or trademarks.
The analytical process in IP analytics typically follows a structured methodology, as described in WIPO's guidelines for patent analytics. [16]
This six-stage process is applicable across patent, trademark, and design analysis:
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2025 (link)