Iron cage

Last updated

In sociology, the iron cage is a concept introduced by Max Weber to describe the increased rationalization inherent in social life, particularly in Western capitalist societies. The "iron cage" thus traps individuals in systems based purely on teleological efficiency, rational calculation and control. Weber also described the bureaucratization of social order as "the polar night of icy darkness". [1]

Contents

The original German term is stahlhartes Gehäuse (steel-hard casing); this was translated into "iron cage", an expression made familiar to English-speakers by Talcott Parsons in his 1930 translation of Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . [2] This choice has been questioned recently by scholars who prefer the more direct translation: "shell as hard as steel". [2] [3]

Weber (in Parsons' translation) wrote:

In Baxter's view the care for external goods should only lie on the shoulders of the 'saint like a light cloak, which can be thrown aside at any moment.' But fate decreed that the cloak should become an iron cage. [4]

Iron cage of capitalism

In his 1904 book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism , Weber introduces the metaphor of an "iron cage":

The Puritan wanted to work in a calling; we are forced to do so. For when asceticism was carried out of monastic cells into everyday life, and began to dominate worldly morality, it did its part in building the tremendous cosmos of the modern economic order. This order is now bound to the technical and economic conditions of machine production which to-day determine the lives of all the individuals who are born into this mechanism, not only those directly concerned with economic acquisition, with irresistible force. Perhaps it will so determine them until the last ton of fossilized coal is burnt. In Baxter's view the care for external goods should only lie on the shoulders of the "saint like a light cloak, which can be thrown aside at any moment". But fate decreed that the cloak should become an iron cage.

According to Weber, the market-dominated economic order was created by innovative, religiously motivated economic forces. But the individual today can no longer engage in such creative action. Instead, the worker must operate in a narrowly-defined specialization, and economic enterprises must continually strive to maximize profits and rationalize their production for the sake of efficiency. This is the present-day iron cage of institutionalized capitalism.

Weber presents his argument in an ironic form. Religion of a particular sort was necessary to revolutionize the economy and the world. A Protestant ethic drove the reorganization of traditional economic life to become a calculating efficient system. But now such religious views are no longer needed to sustain capitalism. Moreover, the systematic efficient calculations of capitalism help propel the secularization of the world and the decline in religious belief. "The course of development," Weber argues, "involves... the bringing in of calculation into the traditional brotherhood, displacing the old religious relationship." [5]

Effects of bureaucracies

Positive contributions

Bureaucracies were distinct from the feudal system and patrimonialism where people were promoted on the basis of personal relationships. [6] In bureaucracies, there was a set of rules that are clearly defined and promotion through technical qualifications, seniority [7] and disciplinary control. Weber believes that this influenced modern society [8] and how we operate today, especially politically. [9]

Bureaucratic formalism is often connected to Weber's metaphor of the iron cage because the bureaucracy is the greatest expression of rationality.

Weber wrote that bureaucracies are goal-oriented organizations that are based on rational principles that are used to efficiently reach their goals. [10] However, Weber also recognizes that there are constraints within the "iron cage" of such a bureaucratic system. [11]

Negative effects of bureaucracies

Bureaucracies concentrate large amounts of power in a small number of people and are generally unregulated. [12] Weber believed that those who control these organizations control the quality of our lives as well. Bureaucracies tend to generate oligarchy; which is where a few officials are the political and economic power. According to Weber, because bureaucracy is a form of organization superior to all others, [13] further bureaucratization and rationalization may be an inescapable fate. [14]

Iron cage of bureaucracy

Because of these aforementioned reasons, there will be an evolution of an iron cage, which will be a technically ordered, rigid, dehumanized society. [15] The iron cage is the one set of rules and laws that we are all subjected and must adhere to. [16] Bureaucracy puts us in an iron cage, which limits individual human freedom and potential instead of a "technological eutopia" that should set us free. [15] [17] It is the way of the institution, where we do not have a choice anymore. [18] Once capitalism came about, it was like a machine that you were being pulled into without an alternative option. [19] Laws of bureaucracies include the following: [20]

  1. The official is subject to authority only with respect to their official obligation
  2. Organized in a clearly defined hierarchy of offices
  3. Each office has a clearly defined sphere of competence
  4. The official has a free contractual relationship; free selection
  5. Officials are selected through technical qualification
  6. The official is paid by fixed salaries
  7. The office is the primary occupation of the official
  8. Promotion is based on an achievement which is granted by the judgment of superiors
  9. The official works entirely separated from ownership of the means of administration
  10. The official is subject to strict and systematic discipline within the office

Costs of bureaucracies

"Rational calculation ... reduces every worker to a cog in this bureaucratic machine and, seeing himself in this light, he will merely ask how to transform himself... to a bigger cog... The passion for bureaucratization at this meeting drives us to despair." [21]

Bureaucratic hierarchies can control resources in pursuit of their own personal interests, [31] which impacts society's lives greatly and society has no control over this. It also affects society's political order and governments because bureaucracies were built to regulate these organizations, but corruption remains an issue. [32] The goal of the bureaucracy has a single-minded pursuit [33] that can ruin social order; what might be good for the organization might not be good for the society as a whole, which can later harm the bureaucracy's future. [34] Formal rationalization [35] in bureaucracy has its problems as well. There are issues of control, depersonalization and increasing domination. Once the bureaucracy is created, the control is indestructible. [36] There is only one set of rules and procedures, which reduces everyone to the same level. Depersonalization occurs because individual situations are not accounted for. [37] Most importantly, the bureaucracies will become more dominating over time unless they are stopped. In an advanced industrial-bureaucratic society, everything becomes part of the expanding machine, even people. [38]

While bureaucracies are supposed to be based on rationalization, they act in the exact opposite manner. Political bureaucracies are established so that they protect our civil liberties, but they violate them with their imposing rules. Development and agricultural bureaucracies are set so that they help farmers, but put them out of business due to market competition that the bureaucracies contribute to. Service bureaucracies like health care are set to help the sick and elderly, but then they deny care based on specific criteria. [15]

Debates regarding bureaucracies

Weber argues that bureaucracies have dominated modern society's social structure; [39] but we need these bureaucracies to help regulate our complex society.[ citation needed ] Bureaucracies may have desirable intentions to some, but they tend to undermine human freedom and democracy in the long run. [40]

Rationalization destroyed the authority of magical powers, but it also brought into being the machine-like regulation of bureaucracy, which ultimately challenges all systems of belief. [41]

According to Weber, society sets up these bureaucratic systems, and it is up to society to change them. Weber argues that it is very difficult to change or break these bureaucracies, but if they are indeed socially constructed, then society should be able to intervene and shift the system.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Weber</span> German sociologist, jurist, and political economist (1864–1920)

Maximilian Carl Emil Weber was a German sociologist, historian, jurist, and political economist who was one of the central figures in the development of sociology and the social sciences more generally. His ideas continue to influence social theory and research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of religion</span>

Sociology of religion is the study of the beliefs, practices and organizational forms of religion using the tools and methods of the discipline of sociology. This objective investigation may include the use both of quantitative methods and of qualitative approaches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Political sociology is an interdisciplinary field of study concerned with exploring how governance and society interact and influence one another at the micro to macro levels of analysis. Interested in the social causes and consequences of how power is distributed and changes throughout and amongst societies, political sociology's focus ranges across individual families to the state as sites of social and political conflict and power contestation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organizational theory</span> Sociological study of social organizations

Organizational theory refers to a series of interrelated concepts that involve the sociological study of the structures and operations of formal social organizations. Organizational theory also seeks to explain how interrelated units of organization either connect or do not connect with each other. Organizational theory also concerns understanding how groups of individuals behave, which may differ from the behavior of an individual. The behavior organizational theory often focuses on is goal-directed. Organizational theory covers both intra-organizational and inter-organizational fields of study.

<i>The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism</i> 1905 sociology book by Max Weber

The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a book written by Max Weber, a German sociologist, economist, and politician. It began as a series of essays, the original German text was composed in 1904 and '05, and was translated into English for the first time by American sociologist Talcott Parsons in 1930. It is considered a founding text in economic sociology and a milestone contribution to sociological thought in general.

The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism is a book written by Max Weber, a German economist and sociologist. It was first published in German under the title Konfuzianismus und Taoismus in 1915 and an adapted version appeared in 1920. An English translation was published in 1951 and several editions have been released since.

The Protestant work ethic, also known as the Calvinist work ethic or the Puritan work ethic, is a work ethic concept in sociology, economics, and history. It emphasizes that a person's subscription to the values espoused by the Protestant faith, particularly Calvinism, result in diligence, discipline, and frugality.

Rational-legal authority is a form of leadership in which the authority of an organization or a ruling regime is largely tied to legal rationality, legal legitimacy and bureaucracy. The majority of the modern states of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are rational-legal authorities, according to those who use this form of classification.

The sociologist Max Weber formulated a three-component theory of stratification in which he defined party class as a group of people that can be differentiated on the basis of their affiliations with other engaged members in the political domain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Weber bibliography</span>

This is a chronological list of works by Max Weber. Original titles with dates of publication and translated titles are given when possible, then a list of works translated into English, with earliest-found date of translation. The list of translations is most likely incomplete.

The culture of capitalism or capitalist culture is the set of social practices, social norms, values and patterns of behavior that are attributed to the capitalist economic system in a capitalist society. Capitalist culture promotes the accumulation of capital and the sale of commodities, where individuals are primarily defined by their relationship to business and the market. The culture is composed of people who, behaving according to a set of learned rules, act as they must act in order to survive in capitalist societies.

In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German sociologist, jurist, and economist. Rationalization is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for behavior in society with concepts based on rationality and reason. The term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview or perspective (idea). For example, the implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization, as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.

In social science, disenchantment is the cultural rationalization and devaluation of religion apparent in modern society. The term was borrowed from Friedrich Schiller by Max Weber to describe the character of a modernized, bureaucratic, secularized Western society. In Western society, according to Weber, scientific understanding is more highly valued than belief, and processes are oriented toward rational goals, as opposed to traditional society, in which "the world remains a great enchanted garden".

Institutional analysis is the part of the social sciences that studies how institutions—i.e., structures and mechanisms of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of two or more individuals—behave and function according to both empirical rules and also theoretical rules. This field deals with how individuals and groups construct institutions, how institutions function in practice, and the effects of institutions on each other, on individuals, societies and the community at large.

The economics of religion concerns both the application of the techniques of economics to the study of religion and the relationship between economic and religious behaviours. Contemporary writers on the subject trace it back to Adam Smith (1776).

<i>Economy and Society</i> German-language work in economics and sociology by Max Weber

Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology is a book by political economist and sociologist Max Weber, published posthumously in Germany by his wife Marianne. Alongside The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), it is considered to be one of Weber's most important works. Extremely broad in scope, the book covers numerous themes including religion, economics, politics, public administration, and sociology. A complete translation of the work was not published in English until 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureaucracy</span> Administrative system governing any large institution

Bureaucracy is a system of organization where decisions are made by a body of non-elected officials. Historically, a bureaucracy was a government administration managed by departments staffed with non-elected officials. Today, bureaucracy is the administrative system governing any large institution, whether publicly owned or privately owned. The public administration in many jurisdictions is an example of bureaucracy, as is any centralized hierarchical structure of an institution, including corporations, societies, nonprofit organisations, and clubs.

Throughout modern history, a variety of perspectives on capitalism have evolved based on different schools of thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bibliography of sociology</span>

This bibliography of sociology is a list of works, organized by subdiscipline, on the subject of sociology. Some of the works are selected from general anthologies of sociology, while other works are selected because they are notable enough to be mentioned in a general history of sociology or one of its subdisciplines.

Inner-worldly asceticism was characterized by Max Weber in Economy and Society as the concentration of human behavior upon activities leading to salvation within the context of the everyday world.

References

  1. ↑ Lassman, Peter, ed. (1994). Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Translated by Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge University Press. p. xvi. ISBN   0-521-39719-7.
  2. 1 2 Baehr, Peter (2001). "The "Iron Cage" and the "Shell as Hard as Steel": Parsons, Weber, and the Stahlhartes Gehäuse Metaphor in the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism". History and Theory. 40 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1111/0018-2656.00160.
  3. ↑ Weber, Max (2002). Baehr, Peter R.; Wells, Gordon C. (eds.). The Protestant ethic and the "spirit" of capitalism and other writings. Penguin Classics. p. xxiv. ISBN   0-14-043921-8.
  4. ↑ Weber, Max (1905). "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism".
  5. ↑ Weber, Max. General Economic History. Dover Publications, 2003. 356.
  6. ↑ Morrison, Kenneth. Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of Modern Social Thought. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Ltd, 2006. 363.
  7. ↑ "Merton - Bureaucratic Structure and Personality". media.pfeiffer.edu. Archived from the original on 2015-05-01. Retrieved 2008-04-08.
  8. ↑ "Page not found - Macquarie University". www.mq.edu.au. Archived from the original on 2021-10-31. Retrieved 2019-03-29.{{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help)
  9. ↑ Kilcullen, John. "Max Weber: on Bureaucracy." Macquarie University, Australia. 1996. 7 Apr. 2008
  10. ↑ Hamilton, Peter. Max Weber: Critical Assessments. 1st ed. Routledge, 1991. 294.
  11. ↑ Ritzer, George. Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption. 2nd ed. Pine Forge P, 2004. 56.
  12. ↑ Kendall, Diana, Jane L. Murray, and Rick Linden. Sociology in Our Times. 3rd ed. Nelson Education Ltd., 2004. 190.
  13. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20070611123100/http://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Weber/Presentation/Weber.ppt. Archived from the original on 11 June 2007.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  14. ↑ Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press, 1978. 1403
  15. 1 2 3 "The Sociology of Max Weber". www.faculty.rsu.edu. Archived from the original on 2012-11-29. Retrieved 2019-03-29.
  16. ↑ Ashworth, Rachel, George Boyne, and Rick Delbridge. "Escape From the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2007). 7 Apr. 2008.
  17. ↑ Benhabib, Seyla, and Fred R. Dallmayr. The Communicative Ethics Controversy (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought). The MIT Press, 1990. 29-32.
  18. ↑ Weber, Max. Essays in Economic Sociology. Ed. Richard Swedberg. Princeton UP, 1999. 110.
  19. ↑ Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: and Other Writings. Ed. Peter Baehr. Trans. Gordon C. Wells. Penguin Classics, 2002. 121.
  20. ↑ Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press, 1978. 220-221.
  21. ↑ Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press, 1978. lix.
  22. ↑ Smart, Barry. Resisting McDonaldization. Sage Publications Ltd, 1999. 84.
  23. ↑ Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. 1st ed. Routledge, 1991. 412.
  24. ↑ Boucock, Cary. In the Grip of Freedom: Law and Modernity in Max Weber. University of Toronto P, 2000. 65.
  25. ↑ Weber, Marianne. Max Weber: a Biography. Transaction Publishers, 1988. 427.
  26. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20061205094352/http://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Weber/Presentation/Weber.ppt. Archived from the original on 5 December 2006.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  27. ↑ Grusky, David B., ed. Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective. 2nd ed. Westview P, 2000. 825.
  28. ↑ Thompson, Grahame, Jennifer Frances, Rosalind Levacic, and Jeremy C. Mitchell, eds. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: the Coordination of Social Life. Sage Publications Ltd, 1991. 119.
  29. ↑ Baurmann, Michael. The Market of Virtue: Morality and Commitment in a Liberal Society. Springer P, 2002. 13-15.
  30. ↑ Slipp, Samuel. Curative Factors in Dynamic Psychotherapy. McGraw-Hill Companies, 1981. 256.
  31. ↑ Andrain, Charles F. Comparative Political Systems: Policy Performance and Social Change. M.E. Sharpe, 1994. 162-164.
  32. ↑ Turner, Bryan S. "Max Weber on Individualism, Bureaucracy and Despotism: Political Authoritarianism and Contemporary Politics." Organizing Modernity: New Weberian Perspectives on Work, Organizations and Society. Ed. Larry Ray. Routledge, 1994. 122-124.
  33. ↑ Boucock, Cary. In the Grip of Freedom: Law and Modernity in Max Weber. University of Toronto P, 2000. 165.
  34. ↑ Maheshwari, Shiram. A Dictionary of Public Administration. Sangam Books Ltd, 2002. 72-75.
  35. ↑ Mommsen, Wolfgang J. The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber: Collected Essays. University of Chicago P, 1989. 155.
  36. ↑ Hamilton, Peter. Max Weber: Critical Assessments. 1st ed. Routledge, 1991. 322.
  37. ↑ Hess, Beth B., Elizabeth W. Markson, and Peter J. Stein. Sociology. Prentice Hall, 1988. 91.
  38. ↑ "Lee Clarke's Introduction to Sociology". leeclarke.com.
  39. ↑ Hyden, Goran, Julius Court, and Kenneth Mease. Making Sense of Governance: Empirical Evidence From Sixteen Developing Countries. Lynne Rienner, 2004. 21.
  40. ↑ Best, Steven, and Douglas Kellner. The Postmodern Turn. 1st ed. The Guilford P, 1997. 76.
  41. ↑ Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. 1st ed. Routledge, 1991. xxiv.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.