K-152 Nerpa accident

Last updated

K-152 Nerpa accident
Akula class submarine.JPG
An Akula-class submarine similar to K-152 Nerpa
Date8 November 2008
Time08:30 pm local time
Location Peter the Great Gulf, Sea of Japan, off the coast of Primorski Krai
Casualties
20 killed
41 injured
Accident occurred on board the Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa

The K-152 Nerpa accident occurred aboard the Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa on 8 November 2008, which resulted in the deaths of 20 people and injuries to 41 more. The accident was blamed on a crew member who was allegedly playing with a fire suppressant system that he thought was not operative.

Contents

Halon gas was released inside two compartments of the submerged submarine during the vessel's sea trials in the Sea of Japan, asphyxiating the victims or causing frostbite in their lungs. The high casualty count was attributed in part to the large number of civilians on board who were assisting with the testing before commissioning. Three of the dead were Russian naval personnel and the rest were civilian employees of the Vostok, Zvezda, Era, and Amur shipbuilding yards. [1] The incident was the worst Russian submarine disaster since the sinking of Kursk in 2000. [2]

Sequence of events

At the time of the accident, Nerpa was undergoing sea trials at the Russian Pacific Fleet's test range in Peter the Great Gulf, an inlet of the Sea of Japan adjoining the coast of Russia's Primorski Krai province. The vessel had not yet been commissioned by the Russian Navy and was undergoing plant tests under the supervision of a team from the Amur shipyard. [3] For this reason, it had a much larger than usual complement aboard, totaling 208 people, 81 military personnel and 127 civilian engineers from the shipyards responsible for building and outfitting the submarine. [4]

The accident occurred at 8:30 pm local time on 8 November 2008, [5] during the submarine's first underwater test run. [3] The submarine's fire extinguishing system was triggered, sealing two forward compartments and filling them with R-114B2 gas (dibromotetrafluoroethane, known as khladon in Russian). [6] The gas, a haloalkane refrigerant, is used in the Russian Navy's LOKh (lodochnaya obyemnaya khimischeskaya – "submarine volumetric chemical") fire-suppressant system. Each compartment of a Russian submarine contains a LOKh station from which the gas can be delivered into that or adjacent compartments. [7] The gas displaces oxygen and chemically interferes with combustion, enabling it to extinguish fires rapidly in enclosed spaces. In high concentrations, it can cause narcosis, which progresses by stages into excitation, mental confusion, lethargy, and ultimately asphyxiation. [4]

Twenty people died of asphyxiation in the accident. The number of injured was initially put at 21 [8] but was later revised to 41 by the Amurskiy Shipbuilding Company, some of whose employees were among the injured. Many of the injured were reported to have suffered from frostbite caused by the chilling effect of the gas. [9]

Following the incident, the Udaloy-class destroyer Admiral Tributs and the rescue vessel Sayany were dispatched from Vladivostok to provide assistance to the stricken submarine. The injured survivors were transferred to the destroyer and sent to military hospitals for treatment, while the submarine returned under its own power to Primorsky Krai. [4] According to naval spokesman Igor Digaylo, the vessel was not damaged in the incident and radiation levels remained normal. [10]

Causes

Two principal explanations of the disaster have been advanced by naval experts and the media—an equipment failure or human error.

Equipment failure

The LOKh fire suppression system aboard Nerpa was reportedly of a new type that had not previously been used aboard any Russian submarine. Earlier versions of the LOKh system only operate under manual control from the duty shift console. The new system installed on Nerpa could also operate in automatic mode, responding to smoke and rises in compartment temperature and activating individually in each compartment. According to the testimony of an engineer from the Zvezda shipyard, this had malfunctioned before while the submarine was being readied for its sea trials. Some commentators speculated that the system could have been accidentally activated. [11]

Human error

On 10 November 2008, a Russian Navy statement blamed the disaster on an "unsanctioned operation" of the fire suppression system aboard Nerpa. [4] Three days later, naval investigators announced that a crewman, named unofficially as Dmitry Grobov, had turned on the system "without permission or any particular grounds". According to reports in the Russian media, Grobov believed that a local control unit was not connected. Out of boredom, he started playing with it. The submarine local control units are protected by five-digit access numbers, but during sea trials, the access codes were penciled on the units. The seaman increased readings up from the original value of 30°C to 78°C, causing the control system to believe that a fire was on board. The control unit requested permission to start the fire-suppression system. Grobov granted permission, possibly without realizing what he was doing. [12] [13] He was charged and would face up to seven years in prison if convicted.

In April 2013, Grobov was acquitted by a jury. This trial followed an earlier not guilty verdict on September 14, 2011. The 2011 verdict was overruled by the Supreme Court's military board in May 2012, leading to the April retrial. [14]

Colleagues expressed skepticism at this accusation, describing the accused crewman as an experienced and skilled specialist. [15] A number of retired naval officers told the business daily Kommersant that they doubted that Grobov was solely to blame, as one person could not activate the system due to it requiring multiple levels of confirmation before it can be activated.[ citation needed ]

Exacerbating factors

According to survivors, those affected by the gas release were caught off guard and may not have been alerted in time due to warning sirens sounding only after the gas had already begun pouring in. Some of the victims were reported to have been unable to don breathing kits before they suffocated. [16]

Igor Kurdin, a former Typhoon-class submarine commander and the current head of the St. Petersburg Submariners Club, attributed the high casualty count to the presence of a large number of civilian specialists on the submarine at the time of the accident. Seventeen of 20 people who perished in the accident were civilians. He noted that civilian observers would be untrained in the proper response to the release of the boat's firefighting gas, which would be preceded by a specific light and sound signal, after which all on board are supposed to put on oxygen masks to allow them to survive during the 30-minute period required to ventilate the compartments before they can be reopened. In addition, because the accident occurred at 8:30 pm, many of the civilian specialists and crewmen would likely have been asleep, and unable to don their oxygen masks in time. [17] The accident is the country's worst since the controversial 12 August 2000, sinking of the Russian nuclear submarine Kursk .

Mikhail Barabanov, editor-in-chief of Moscow Defense Brief, said the potential for accidental discharge of the fire-suppression system on Russian submarines is not unheard of, but this type of incident does not normally result in fatalities. However, Nerpa was carrying what he described as a "crowd of civilians" on board. The presence of the civilian shipbuilding contractors in addition to the military crewmen resulted in the vessel becoming "overcrowded". His estimation of the events that compounded the loss of life were: "the fire alarm failed to work, so passengers did not realize that the gas started to displace oxygen in the affected compartments." [18] Some suggested that not enough breathing kits had been available for the larger than usual number of people aboard, or that the civilians had not been properly trained in their use. [1] Survivors stated that some breathing apparatuses had not worked or had failed after only a few minutes; some of the dead were reportedly found still wearing their breathing kits. [15]

Official reactions

Russia

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev ordered Defence Minister Anatoliy Serdyukov to undertake an immediate investigation into the causes of the accident. [4] Colonel General Aleksandr Kolmakov, the First Deputy Minister of Defence, and Admiral Vladimir Vysotsky, the Navy Commander-in-Chief, were sent to the Far East region to oversee the investigation. The President also ordered Prosecutor General Yuriy Chayka to undertake a criminal investigation of the incident and a team of officers from the Main Military Procuracy were sent to investigate the case. [3] The Russian Navy and the governments of the Primorsky Krai and Khabarovsk Krai regions announced compensation packages to assist the families of those who lost their lives in the accident. [19]

India

Initially, there were reports in Russian and Indian media of a crew from the Indian Navy heading to Vladivostok later in November 2008, where they will start "trainings and preparations" aboard Nerpa. [20] [21] [22] These reports came amid speculations that Russia might lease a newly built nuclear submarine to India. [23] Reports later confirmed that the submarine which suffered the accident was indeed the one which was planned to be leased to India. [24] [25]

Indian naval officials said, "Our officials are already in Russia monitoring the submarine project; both during its construction phase and now during the sea trial phase. We are keeping a close watch on the developments."

Opinions were divided among analysts about the effect that the accident would have on military relations with India. A Russian defense analyst remarked that it was unlikely that the incident "would scare India away." [26] On the other hand, Golts stated, "I think this is going to be another serious blow to cooperation with India. India will be even more concerned about the quality of Russian weapons." He also stated that India had desired secrecy, lest the United States apply pressure to scuttle the deal, but that with no other suppliers of such submarines, India would probably still accept the deal. [27] The planned lease of the submarine to India was in 2008 reported to be cancelled following the incident. [28] However, the submarine was officially inducted into the Indian Navy on 4 April 2012 as INS Chakra. [29] [30]

Related Research Articles

Russian submarine <i>Kursk</i> (K-141) Oscar-II class cruise missile submarine

K-141 Kursk was an Oscar II-class nuclear-powered cruise missile submarine of the Russian Navy. On 12 August 2000, K-141 Kursk was lost when it sank in the Barents Sea, killing all 118 personnel on board.

Soviet submarine <i>K-219</i> A Project 667A Navaga-class ballistic missile submarine

K-219 was a Project 667A Navaga-class ballistic missile submarine of the Soviet Navy. It carried 16 R-27U liquid-fuel missiles powered by UDMH with nitrogen tetroxide (NTO). K-219 was involved in what has become one of the most controversial submarine incidents during the Cold War on Friday 3 October 1986. The 15-year-old vessel, which was on an otherwise routine Cold War nuclear deterrence patrol in the North Atlantic 1,090 kilometres (680 mi) northeast of Bermuda, suffered an explosion and fire in a missile tube. While underway a submerged seal in a missile hatch cover failed, allowing high-pressure seawater to enter the missile tube and owing to the pressure differential ruptured the missile fuel tanks, allowing the missile's liquid fuel to mix and ultimately combust. Though there was no official announcement, the Soviet Union claimed the leak was caused by a collision with the submarine USS Augusta. Although Augusta was operating within the area, both the United States Navy and the commander of K-219, Captain Second Rank Igor Britanov, deny that a collision took place.

Soviet submarine <i>K-19</i> Ballistic missile submarine

K-19 was the first submarine of the Project 658 class, the first generation of Soviet nuclear submarines equipped with nuclear ballistic missiles, specifically the R-13 SLBM. The boat was hastily built by the Soviets in response to United States' developments in nuclear submarines as part of the arms race. Before she was launched, 10 civilian workers and a sailor died due to accidents and fires. After K-19 was commissioned, the boat had multiple breakdowns and accidents, several of which threatened to sink the submarine.

Soviet submarine K-278 <i>Komsomolets</i> Nuclear-powered attack submarine

The K-278 Komsomolets was the Project-685 Plavnik, nuclear-powered attack submarine of the Soviet Navy; the only submarine of her design class.

USS <i>Scorpion</i> (SSN-589) Skipjack-class nuclear-powered submarine

USS Scorpion (SSN-589) was a Skipjack-class nuclear-powered submarine that served in the United States Navy, the sixth vessel and second submarine to carry that name.

Victor-class submarine Soviet nuclear-powered attack submarine

The Victor class, Soviet designations Project 671 Yorsh, Project 671RT Syomga and Project 671RTM/RTMK Shchuka,, are series of nuclear-powered attack submarines built in the Soviet Union and operated by the Soviet Navy. Since the 1960s, 48 units were built in total, of which the last remaining are currently in service with the Russian Navy. The Victor-class submarines featured a teardrop shape, allowing them to travel at high speed. These vessels were primarily designed to protect Soviet surface fleets and to attack American ballistic missile submarines. Project 671 began in 1959 with the design task assigned to SKB-143.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear submarine</span> Submarine powered by a nuclear reactor

A nuclear submarine is a submarine powered by a nuclear reactor, but not necessarily nuclear-armed. Nuclear submarines have considerable performance advantages over "conventional" submarines. Nuclear propulsion, being completely independent of air, frees the submarine from the need to surface frequently, as is necessary for conventional submarines. The large amount of power generated by a nuclear reactor allows nuclear submarines to operate at high speed for long periods, and the long interval between refuelings grants a virtually unlimited range, making the only limits on voyage times being factors such as the need to restock food or other consumables. The limited energy stored in electric batteries means that even the most advanced conventional submarine can remain submerged for only a few days at slow speed, and only a few hours at top speed, though recent advances in air-independent propulsion have somewhat ameliorated this disadvantage. The high cost of nuclear technology means that relatively few of the world's military powers have fielded nuclear submarines. Radiation incidents have occurred within the Soviet submarines, including serious nuclear and radiation accidents, but American naval reactors starting with the S1W and iterations of designs have operated without incident since USS Nautilus (SSN-571) launched in 1954.

<i>Akula</i>-class submarine Class of nuclear attack submarines

The Akula class, Soviet designation Project 971 Shchuka-B is a series of fourth generation nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs) first deployed by the Soviet Navy in 1986. There are four sub-classes or flights of Shchuka-B, consisting of the original seven Project 971 boats, commissioned between 1984 and 1990; six Project 971Is, commissioned between 1991 and 2009; one Project 971U, commissioned in 1995; and one Project 971M, commissioned in 2001. The Russians call all of the submarines Shchuka-B, regardless of modifications.

Soviet submarine <i>K-3 Leninsky Komsomol</i> First soviet nuclear submarine

К-3 was a project 627 "Кит" submarine of the Soviet Navy's Northern Fleet, the first nuclear submarine of the Soviet Union. The vessel was prototyped in wood, with each of five segments scattered between five different locations about Leningrad, including the Astoria Hotel. She was built in Molotovsk, launched on 9 August 1957, commissioned in July 1958, and homeported at Zapadnaya Litsa on the Kola Peninsula. K-3 was designed by Vladimir Peregoudov. Her initial captain was Leonid Osipenko, and the executive officer was Lev Zhiltsov, who had the important task of assembling the first crew.

INS <i>Sindhurakshak</i> (S63) Indian naval vessel

INS Sindhurakshak was a Russian-made Kilo-class 877EKM (Sindhughosh-class) diesel-electric submarine of the Indian Navy. Commissioned on 24 December 1997, it was the ninth of the ten Kilo-class submarines in the Indian Navy. On 4 June 2010, the Indian Defence Ministry and Zvezdochka shipyard signed a contract worth US$80 million to upgrade and overhaul the submarine. After the overhaul, it returned to India from Russia between May and June 2013.

Type 091 submarine Nuclear-powered attack submarine class

The Type 091 is a first-generation nuclear-powered attack submarine produced by China. It was the People Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) first nuclear submarine, and the first indigenously produced nuclear attack submarine in Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SSN (hull classification symbol)</span> Symbol for nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarine

An SSN is a nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarine. SSN is the US Navy hull classification symbol for such vessels; the SS denotes a submarine and the N denotes nuclear power. The designation SSN is used for interoperability throughout NATO under STANAG 1166, though navies use other terms.

<i>Kursk</i> submarine disaster 2000 submarine accident

The Russian nuclear submarine K-141 Kursk sank in an accident on 12 August 2000 in the Barents Sea, with the loss of all 118 personnel on board. The submarine, which was of the Project 949A-class, was taking part in the first major Russian naval exercise in more than 10 years. The crews of nearby ships felt an initial explosion and a second, much larger explosion, but the Russian Navy did not realise that an accident had occurred and did not initiate a search for the vessel for over six hours. The submarine's emergency rescue buoy had been intentionally disabled during an earlier mission and it took more than 16 hours to locate the submarine, which rested on the ocean floor at a depth of 108 metres (354 ft).

Project 210, Project 10831 or AS-31, nicknamed Losharik, is a Russian deep-diving nuclear powered submarine. On 1 July 2019, a fire broke out on the vessel while it was taking underwater measurements of the sea floor in Russian territorial waters.

Russian submarine <i>Nerpa</i> (K-152) Russian Akula-class submarine

Nerpa is a 8,140-tonne (8,010-long-ton) Project 971 nuclear-powered attack submarine. The construction of the submarine was started in Russia in 1993, but was suspended due to lack of funding. India then sponsored further construction and sea trials of the submarine provided it was leased to the Indian Navy for 10 years. It was launched as K-152 Nerpa in October 2008 and entered service with the Russian Navy in late 2009. The submarine was leased to the Indian Navy in 2011 after extensive trials, and was formally commissioned into service as INS Chakra with the Eastern Naval Command at a ceremony in Visakhapatnam on 4 April 2012. In June 2021 Chakra was spotted on the surface escorted by Indian and Russian warships in the Singapore Strait while presumably heading towards the Russian naval base in Vladivostok; some media speculated that she was returning to Russia before the expiry of the lease term.

INS <i>Arihant</i> Indian nuclear powered submarine

INS Arihant, designated S2 Strategic Strike Nuclear Submarine, is the lead ship of India's Arihant class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. The 6,000 tonne vessel was built under the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) project at the Ship Building Centre in the port city of Visakhapatnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific Fleet (Russia)</span> Russian Navy fleet

The Pacific Fleet is the Russian Navy fleet in the Pacific Ocean. Established in 1731 as part of the Imperial Russian Navy, the fleet was known as the Okhotsk Military Flotilla (1731–1856) and Siberian Military Flotilla (1856–1918), formed to defend Russian interests in the Russian Far East region along the Pacific coast. In 1918 the fleet was inherited by the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, then the Soviet Union in 1922 as part of the Soviet Navy, being reformed several times before being disbanded in 1926. In 1932 it was re-established as the Pacific Fleet, and was known as the Red Banner Pacific Fleet after World War II as it had earned the Order of the Red Banner. In the Soviet years, the fleet was also responsible for the Soviet Navy's operations in the Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Red Banner Pacific Fleet was inherited by the Russian Federation as part of the Russian Navy and its current name was adopted.

References

  1. 1 2 Ren TV, Moscow, 2030 GMT 10 November 2008
  2. ↑ Syal, Rajeev (9 November 2008). "Twenty die in nuclear submarine accident". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
  3. 1 2 3 Poroskov, Nikolai (10 November 2008). "Accidents More Terrifying Than Fire". Vremya Novostei.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "Twenty Persons Perished Aboard a Submarine Due to a Defective Fire-Extinguishing System". Komsomolskaya Pravda. 9 November 2008.
  5. ↑ Loiko, Sergei L. (8 November 2008). "False fire alarm blamed in Russian sub deaths". The Columbus Dispatch. Archived from the original on 13 April 2011. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  6. ↑ "Fire on Board the Russian Navy Akula II Nuclear Submarine kills Twenty Russian Sailors". International Online Defense Magazine. 11 November 2008. Archived from the original on 23 January 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2008.
  7. ↑ Romanov, D.A.; Moore, Kenneth J.; trans. Acus, Jonathan E. Fire at Sea: The Tragedy of the Soviet Submarine Komsomolets, p. 250. Brassey's, 2006. ISBN   1-57488-426-3
  8. ↑ "Twenty die on Russian submarine". BBC. 9 November 2008. Archived from the original on 9 November 2008. Retrieved 9 November 2008.
  9. ↑ ""Nerpa" Investigating Officers Debarred". Vostok Media. 19 November 2008. Archived from the original on 9 January 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2008.
  10. ↑ "Primorye flags at half-mast mourning over killed in sub accident [ permanent dead link ]". Information Telegraph Agency of Russia, 11 November 2008
  11. ↑ Zhurman, Olga; Gavrilov, Yuriy (11 November 2008). "Berth of Sadness: The Far East Is Saying Farewell to Deceased Sailors and Shipbuilders". Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
  12. ↑ Матрос запустил смертельный газ на глазах у своего командира? Komsomolskaya Pravda 15 November 2008 (in Russian)
  13. ↑ Матрос включил систему пожаротушения на "Нерпе" от скуки Lenta.ru 15 November 2008
  14. ↑ "Jury acquits officers in Nerpa submarine fatal accident trial". RAPSI. 26 April 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
  15. 1 2 Halpin, Tony (13 November 2008). "Crew member blamed for Russian submarine disaster". The Times . London. Retrieved 27 November 2008.[ dead link ]
  16. ↑ "Russian sub survivors: Freon killed as crew slept". Associated Press. 11 November 2008. Retrieved 27 November 2008.[ dead link ]
  17. ↑ Loiko, Sergei L. (10 November 2008). "False alarm blamed for Russian submarine deaths". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on 13 December 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  18. ↑ "Tragedy Under The Sea". Newsweek. 9 November 2008. Archived from the original on 13 November 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  19. ↑ Centre TV, Moscow. 1130 GMT, 10 November 2008
  20. ↑ "Hindoos lease our submarine – Business – Vladivostok News". Vn.vladnews.ru. Retrieved 11 November 2008.[ permanent dead link ]
  21. ↑ "The Hindu News Update Service". Chennai, India: Hindu.com. 2 November 2008. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  22. ↑ Sandeep Unnithan. "India Today – India's most widely read magazine". Indiatoday.digitaltoday.in. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  23. ↑ "domain-b.com : Speculation mounts about Indian lease of new Russian nuclear attack sub". Domain-b.com. Archived from the original on 3 November 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  24. ↑ "India was planning to lease Russian sub that suffered fatalities, reports say". Kansascity.com. Retrieved 11 November 2008.[ dead link ]
  25. ↑ Halpin, Tony (11 November 2008). "Russian nuclear death sub 'was due for delivery to India'". London: Timesonline. Archived from the original on 11 November 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  26. ↑ "Nuclear Submarine Accident Kills 20". Moscow Times . 10 November 2008. Archived from the original on 12 November 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  27. ↑ "Behind the Russian Sub Disaster". Newsweek. 9 November 2008. Archived from the original on 13 November 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  28. ↑ "Nerpa nuclear submarine to join Russian Navy". Newstrack India . Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  29. ↑ "INS Chakra: Govt inducts Russian-origin Akula II class Nerpa into Navy". Economic Times. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  30. ↑ "INS Chakra formally inducted into Indian Navy". India Today. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.