Local Government Boundary Commission (1945–1949)

Last updated

The Local Government Boundary Commission was established in 1945 to review the boundaries of local authority areas in England and Wales outside the Counties of London and Middlesex. The Commission produced its report in 1948 which proposed large changes to county-level areas of local government and changes in the structure and division of powers between tiers of administration. The Commission's proposals were not acted on, and it was disbanded in 1949.

Contents

Background

Alterations to local government boundaries had been suspended with the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939. Previously they had been carried out by a number of processes: county boroughs could be constituted or extended by private act of parliament, while county councils were to carry out reviews of county districts (non-county boroughs, urban and rural districts) on a ten yearly cycle. There was no general procedure for adjusting boundaries between administrative counties, or for amalgamating them. The different procedures were not coordinated.

The wartime coalition government published a white paper in January 1945, entitled Local government in England and Wales during the period of reconstruction. [1] The document proposed the establishment of a Local Government Boundary Commission with executive powers to alter council areas, taking over the powers of the county councils and Minister of Health to change areas. In future all proposed changes by local authorities were to be submitted to the Commission. The Commission was to consider administration in each geographical county (the administrative county plus associated county boroughs) and see if there was a prima facie case for a review. If it felt a review was warranted the commission was to notify the Minister and the relevant county council, who could then require the holding of an inquiry into local government in the county.

The problem of local government in the County of London and Middlesex were deemed to be a special case, with the extension of the County of London, the probable disappearance of Middlesex and annexing of parts of the surrounding counties envisaged. The Commission was not to be allowed to consider these issues, which were to be considered by an "authoritative body" at a later stage. It was recognised that Middlesex contained a number of towns "large enough on any standard for county borough status" but the commissioners were not given the power to "entertain applications for county borough status in the county".

The Commission was to have the power to:

The decisions of the commission were to be subject to parliamentary review. The proposals in the white paper were enacted as the Local Government (Boundary Commission) Act 1945 (1945 c.38). It received the royal assent on the last day in office of the caretaker government that had taken over from the coalition in May. [2] Outside observers considered that the establishment of the Commission meant that the Government did not intend to make any changes in the basic structure of local government, and noted that the Commission lacked the power to recommend radical changes such as the establishment of regional councils. [3]

Appointment of commissioners

Following the 1945 general election, Aneurin Bevan was appointed the Secretary of State for Health in the new Labour government, and took over responsibility for the appointment of the Commission. The five commissioners were appointed by Royal Warrant on 25 October 1945. [4] The chairman was Sir Malcolm Trustram Eve and the deputy chairman Sir John Evelyn Maude. The three other members were Sir George Hammond Etherton, Sir Frederick Rees and Bill Holmes.

The Minister of Health made regulations governing the work of the commission. Any alterations in the status or boundaries of local government areas were to create "individually and collectively effective and convenient units of local government administration." The commission was given nine main factors which were to govern their decisions:

Work of the Commission

In April 1946 the Commission wrote to county and county borough councils, asking for information on any boundary proposals they were considering. By August they had received replies from 80 of 83 county boroughs and 42 of 61 county councils, stating they were seeking boundary reviews.

Acting on the information they had received, the Commission prioritised the review of areas into two categories, "A" and "B". Reviews of areas in category A were to proceed as soon as possible, while the review of category B areas would be held back until July, 1947 (except where they would affect the boundaries of areas in category A).

The first reviews concerned the claims of Dagenham, Ilford, Leyton, Luton, Rochester-Chatham-Gillingham, and Walthamstow for county borough status. Among the category A reviews were the boundaries of Bedfordshire, the areas of Surrey within the Greater London area, and a request by the municipal boroughs of Beckenham and Bromley to form a joint county borough. [6]

First report

On 22 April 1947, the Commission presented its first report to parliament, covering its work in 1946. The following investigations had been begun: [7]

In addition, the report recommended the ending of the distinction between (non-county) boroughs, rural districts, and urban districts, with all to become known as "county districts". The privileges granted to boroughs under municipal charters were to be preserved, however.

The Commission also sought an amendment of its powers, to extend its power to divide districts to municipal boroughs as well.

It was announced that decisions in the "urgent" category A areas would be given the following month. [8]

First recommendations

Decisions on the category A areas were announced 1 May 1947:

Two weeks later the Commission issued a statement on further proposed changes:

Second report

The Commission's second report was issued in April 1948. [11] It contained a notably strong section outlining the deficiencies with the existing system of local government, [12] and therefore the report made comprehensive proposals for local government areas throughout England, and suggestions for Wales. [13] It was later to be argued that in producing this report, the Commission had significantly exceeded its brief. [14]

The commission recommended the creation of:

One-tier counties

The proposed one-tier counties were based on twenty large county boroughs, which were to continue to manage all local government services in the area. Two of these counties were to be formed from the amalgamation of a number of existing councils.

  1. Birmingham
  2. Bradford
  3. Bristol
  4. Central Sussex (Brighton county borough, Hove municipal borough, and Portslade, Shoreham and Southwick urban districts)
  5. Coventry
  6. Croydon
  7. Derby
  8. East Ham
  9. Kingston-upon-Hull
  10. Leeds
  11. Leicester
  12. Newcastle upon Tyne
  13. North Staffordshire (Stoke-on-Trent county borough, Newcastle-under-Lyme municipal borough, and Kidsgrove urban district)
  14. Nottingham
  15. Plymouth
  16. Portsmouth
  17. Sheffield
  18. Southampton
  19. Sunderland
  20. West Ham

Two-tier counties

The two-tier counties were based on the existing administrative counties. The commission felt that in order to provide effective local government a county must have a population of more than 200,000 and less than a million. From this it followed that a number of small counties would need to be merged, and large ones divided.

The small counties requiring union were: Cambridgeshire, Herefordshire, Huntingdonshire, Isle of Ely, Lincolnshire (Parts of Holland), Lincolnshire (Parts of Kesteven), Rutland, East Suffolk, West Suffolk, Soke of Peterborough, Westmorland and Worcestershire. Although the Isle of Wight was below the population limit it was to be preserved because it was an island and cannot conveniently be united with the mainland." [5]

The large counties needing division were Cheshire, Lancashire, Staffordshire and the West Riding of Yorkshire.

The proposed two-tier counties were as follows:

  1. Bedfordshire (unchanged)
  2. Berkshire (unchanged)
  3. Buckinghamshire (unchanged)
  4. Cambridgeshire from the merger of Cambridgeshire, Isle of Ely, Huntingdonshire, Soke of Peterborough and the Newmarket Urban District from West Suffolk
  5. Cheshire (reduced in size due to losses of territory to (a) Lancaster South East and Cheshire North East and (b) Lancaster South West and Cheshire North West)
  6. Cornwall (unchanged)
  7. Cumberland (with Carlisle county borough)
  8. Derbyshire
  9. Devon (with Exeter county borough)
  10. Dorset (with Bournemouth county borough)
  11. Durham (with Darlington, Gateshead, South Shields, West Hartlepool county boroughs, but losing territory to North Yorkshire)
  12. East Sussex (with Eastbourne and Hastings county boroughs, but losing territory to Central Sussex)
  13. Essex (with Southend county borough)
  14. Gloucestershire (with Gloucester county borough)
  15. Hampshire (renaming of county of Southampton)
  16. Hereford and Worcester from the merger of Herefordshire, Worcestershire (less Oldbury to Stafford South), Worcester county borough plus Amblecote Urban District, Staffordshire.
  17. Hertfordshire (unchanged)
  18. Isle of Wight (unchanged)
  19. Kent (with Canterbury county borough)
  20. Lancaster Central (including Blackpool, Blackburn, Burnley, Preston and Southport)
  21. Lancaster North and Westmorlandfrom Westmorland and north Lancashire (the Furness area)
  22. Lancaster South (including St Helens, Wigan, Warrington, Bolton, Bury and Rochdale)
  23. Lancaster South East and Cheshire North East (including Manchester, Salford, Stretford, Oldham and Stockport)
  24. Lancaster South West and Cheshire North West (Including Liverpool, Bootle, Wallasey and Birkenhead)
  25. Leicester from the merger of Leicestershire and Rutland
  26. Lincoln South from the merger of Lincolnshire (Parts of Holland) and Lincolnshire (Parts of Kesteven)
  27. Lincoln North from the merger of Lincolnshire (Parts of Lindsey) and Grimsby county borough
  28. Middlesex (unchanged)
  29. Monmouthshire (with Newport county borough)
  30. Norfolk (with Great Yarmouth, Norwich county boroughs)
  31. Northamptonshire (with Northampton county borough)
  32. Northumberland (with Tynemouth county borough)
  33. Nottinghamshire (unchanged)
  34. Oxfordshire (with Oxford county borough)
  35. Salop (unchanged)
  36. Somerset (with Bath county borough)
  37. Stafford Central
  38. Stafford South (including Dudley, Oldbury, Smethwick, Walsall, West Bromwich and Wolverhampton)
  39. Suffolk formed from the merger of East Suffolk and West Suffolk less Newmarket, and Ipswich county borough
  40. Surrey (unchanged)
  41. Warwickshire (unchanged)
  42. West Sussex (less areas lost to Central Sussex)
  43. Wiltshire (unchanged)
  44. York East (Yorkshire East Riding and York county borough)
  45. York Northformed from Yorkshire North Riding, Middlesbrough county borough, and Stockton-on-Tees and Billingham from County Durham
  46. York Southfrom part of West Riding of Yorkshire (including Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham)
  47. York Westfrom most of West Riding of Yorkshire (including Dewsbury, Halifax, Huddersfield and Wakefield)

Most-purpose county boroughs

The county boroughs proposed by the Commission were to be responsible for most local government in their area, only looking to the county councils for large area services. They were a mixture of existing county boroughs and larger non-county boroughs.

  1. Barnsley
  2. Barrow-in-Furness
  3. Bath
  4. Birkenhead
  5. Blackburn
  6. Blackpool
  7. Bolton
  8. Bootle
  9. Bournemouth
  10. Burnley
  11. Cambridge
  12. Carlisle
  13. Chatham-Gillingham-Rochester
  14. Cheltenham
  15. Chesterfield
  16. Darlington
  17. Doncaster
  18. Dudley
  19. Exeter
  20. Gateshead
  21. Gloucester
  22. Grimsby
  23. Halifax
  24. Hastings
  25. Huddersfield
  26. Ipswich
  27. Lincoln
  28. Liverpool †
  29. Luton
  30. Manchester ‡
  31. Middlesbrough
  32. Newport
  33. Northampton
  34. Norwich
  35. Oldham
  36. Oxford
  37. Poole
  38. Preston
  39. Reading
  40. Rochdale
  41. Rotherham
  42. St Helens
  43. Salford
  44. Smethwick
  45. Slough
  46. Southend
  47. Southport
  48. South Shields
  49. Stockport
  50. Stockton-on-Tees (in North Yorkshire)
  51. Stretford
  52. Swindon
  53. Tynemouth
  54. Wallasey
  55. Walsall
  56. Warrington
  57. West Bromwich
  58. West Hartlepool
  59. Wigan
  60. Wolverhampton
  61. Worcester
  62. Worthing
  63. York

†large enough to be a one-tier county, but to be centre of gravity for new county of South West Lancashire and North West Cheshire

‡large enough to be a one-tier county, but to be centre of gravity for new county of South East Lancashire and North East Cheshire

Wales

The Commission did not have detailed proposals for Wales. Glamorgan was to remain two-tier, with Merthyr Tydfil as a county borough within it, while Cardiff was to be a one-tier county. No decision had been made on Swansea. The remaining eleven administrative counties were to be grouped as either two, three, four, or five new counties.

Third report and abolition

On 25 March 1949, the Minister of Health Aneurin Bevan replied to a written question in the House of Commons stating that "it will not be practicable to introduce comprehensive legislation on local government reconstruction in the near future". [15] This meant that the proposals in their previous report would not be carried out, and the Commission's annual report for 1948 which followed in April 1949 was therefore reduced to recommending orders under existing legislation. The report also noted that the four proposals for combinations of Welsh counties had been unanimously rejected by the county councils.

On 27 June 1949 a decision to abolish the commission was announced in parliament. The Minister praised the work done by the Commission, but noted that it did not have the power under the 1945 Act to alter the structure or vary the functions of local government. The Government recognised that it was difficult for the Commission to continue with its work without considering these factors. It was therefore repealing the Act creating the body, restoring the situation for local boundary reviews to that pertaining in 1945. The Government was to carry out a review of the structures and functions of local administration, including London, although the Minister was unable to give a date for its commencement. [16] [17] Local government academic Bruce Wood, reviewing the history of the Commission nearly 30 years later, remarked that its refusal to be constrained in its 1947 report meant the Commission had "committed suicide". [14]

The winding-up of the Commission was enacted by the Local Government Boundary Commission (Dissolution) Act 1949 (12, 13 & 14 Geo. 6 c.83). The planned review never took place. Following the 1950 general election, the Labour government was returned with a small majority. In a debate on local government in the Commons on 17 July 1951, George Lindgren, Parliamentary Secretary for Local Government and Planning stated that the Government was waiting for the results of negotiations between the local authority associations. In the absence of such agreement, no legislation could be introduced due to the state of the parties in the House. The Minister of Local Government and Planning Hugh Dalton, added that "the reform of local government was the type of question regarding which, in a parliament like the present, with the Government having a narrow majority, comprehensive legislation was not realistic." [18]

The statement effectively delayed reform until the next parliament, a fact not lost on the commission's former chairman who wrote to The Times bemoaning the fact that "The Government's review of local government structure, which was stated in 1949 to be already in being, appears to have led nowhere. This lack of decision is bad enough for local government, but surely the reconstitution of district authorities, without previous consideration of any of the functions or boundaries of the existing counties and county boroughs, or even any power to consider them simultaneously, would be a farce." [19]

The Labour party lost power to the Conservatives in the general election of 25 October 1951, and no further review of local government was put forward until the publication of the white papers leading to the Local Government Act 1958.

Related Research Articles

Metropolitan county Type of county-level administrative division of England

The metropolitan counties are a type of county-level administrative division of England. There are six metropolitan counties, which each cover large urban areas, with populations between 1 and 3 million. They were created in 1974 and are each divided into several metropolitan districts or boroughs.

Avon (county)

Avon was a non-metropolitan and ceremonial county in the west of England that existed between 1974 and 1996. The county was named after the River Avon, which flows through the area. It was formed from the county boroughs of Bristol and Bath, together with parts of the administrative counties of Gloucestershire and Somerset.

Merseyside County of England

Merseyside is a metropolitan and ceremonial county in North West England, with a population of 1.38 million. It encompasses the metropolitan area centred on both banks of the lower reaches of the Mersey Estuary and comprises five metropolitan boroughs: Knowsley, St Helens, Sefton, Wirral and the city of Liverpool. Merseyside, which was created on 1 April 1974 as a result of the Local Government Act 1972, takes its name from the River Mersey.

Cumberland Historic county of England

Cumberland is a historic county of North West England that had an administrative function from the 12th century until 1974. It was bordered by Northumberland to the northeast, County Durham to the east, Westmorland to the southeast, Lancashire to the south, and the Scottish counties of Dumfriesshire and Roxburghshire to the north. It formed an administrative county from 1889 to 1974 and now forms part of Cumbria.

Metropolitan Borough of Sefton Metropolitan borough in England

The Metropolitan Borough of Sefton in Merseyside, England, was formed on 1 April 1974 by the amalgamation of the county boroughs of Bootle and Southport, the municipal borough of Crosby, the urban districts of Formby and Litherland, and part of West Lancashire Rural District within the new county of Merseyside. The borough consists of a coastal strip of land on the Irish Sea which extends from Southport in the north to Bootle in the south, and an inland part to Maghull in the south-east. The district is bounded by the city of Liverpool to the south, the Metropolitan Borough of Knowsley to the south-east, and West Lancashire to the east.

Humberside Former county of England

Humberside was a non-metropolitan and ceremonial county in Northern England from 1 April 1974 until 1 April 1996. It was composed of land from either side of the Humber Estuary, created from portions of the East Riding of Yorkshire, West Riding of Yorkshire, and the northern part of Lindsey, Lincolnshire. The county council's headquarters was County Hall at Beverley, inherited from East Riding County Council. Its largest settlement and only city was Kingston upon Hull. The county stretched from Wold Newton in its northern tip to a different Wold Newton at its most southern point.

Counties of England Englands administrative, geographical and political demarcation

The counties of England are areas used for different purposes, which include administrative, geographical, cultural and political demarcation. The term 'county' is defined in several ways and can apply to similar or the same areas used by each of these demarcation structures. These different types of county each have a more formal name but are commonly referred to just as 'counties'. The current arrangement is the result of incremental reform.

Redcliffe-Maud Report

The Redcliffe-Maud Report was published by the Royal Commission on Local Government in England 1966–1969 under the chairmanship of Lord Redcliffe-Maud. Although the commission's proposals were broadly accepted by the Labour government, they were set aside by the Conservative government elected in 1970.

Local Government Act 1972 United Kingdom legislation

The Local Government Act 1972 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that reformed local government in England and Wales on 1 April 1974. It was one of the most significant Acts of Parliament to be passed by the Heath Government of 1970–74.

Metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties of England Subdivisions of England

Metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties are one of the four levels of subdivisions of England used for the purposes of local government outside Greater London and the Isles of Scilly. As originally constituted, the metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties each consisted of multiple districts, had a county council and were also the counties for the purposes of Lieutenancies. Later changes in legislation during the 1980s and 1990s have allowed counties without county councils and 'unitary authority' counties of a single district. Counties for the purposes of Lieutenancies are now defined separately, based on the metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties.

Local Government Act 1958 United Kingdom legislation

The Local Government Act 1958 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom affecting local government in England and Wales outside London these into action.

County Borough of Leeds Administrative division of Yorkshire, England until 1974

The County Borough of Leeds, and its predecessor, the Municipal Borough of Leeds, was a local government district in the West Riding of Yorkshire, England, from 1835 to 1974. Its origin was the ancient borough of Leeds, which was reformed by the Municipal Corporations Act 1835. In 1889, when West Riding County Council was formed, Leeds became a county borough outside the administrative county of the West Riding; and in 1893 the borough gained city status. The borough was extended a number of times, expanding from 21,593 acres (8,738 ha) in 1911 to 40,612 acres (16,435 ha) in 1961; adding in stages the former area of Roundhay, Seacroft, Shadwell and Middleton parishes and gaining other parts of adjacent districts. In 1971 Leeds was the fifth largest county borough by population in England. The county borough was abolished in 1974 and replaced with the larger City of Leeds, a metropolitan district of West Yorkshire.

The Local Government Commission for England was established by the Local Government Act 1958 to review the organisation of local government, and make "such proposals as are hereinafter authorised for effecting changes appearing to the Commissions desirable in the interests of effective and convenient local government". Most of the commission's proposals failed to reach consensus and were not implemented, and the body was dissolved in 1967.

The Local Government Commission for Wales was established by the Local Government Act 1958 to review the organisation of local government in Wales and to make recommendations for its reform. It delivered its report in 1963 and was dissolved in 1967. Its recommendations were not carried out.

Unitary authorities of England Local government in some parts of England

Unitary authorities of England are local authorities that are responsible for the provision of all local government services within a district. They are constituted under the Local Government Act 1992, which amended the Local Government Act 1972 to allow the existence of counties that do not have multiple districts. They typically allow large towns to have separate local authorities from the less urbanised parts of their counties and provide a single authority for small counties where division into districts would be impractical. Unitary authorities do not cover all of England. Most were established during the 1990s, though further tranches were created in 2009 and 2019–20. Unitary authorities have the powers and functions that are elsewhere separately administered by councils of non-metropolitan counties and the non-metropolitan districts within them.

Local Government Commission for England (1992)

The Local Government Commission for England was the body responsible for reviewing the structure of local government in England from 1992 to 2002. It was established under the Local Government Act 1992, replacing the Local Government Boundary Commission for England. The Commission could be ordered by the Secretary of State to undertake "structural reviews" in specified areas and recommend the creation of unitary authorities in the two-tier shire counties of England. The Commission, chaired by John Banham, conducted a review of all the non-metropolitan counties of England from 1993 to 1994, making various recommendations on their future.

2009 structural changes to local government in England 2009 changes to the structure of state administration on a local level in England

Structural changes to local government in England were effected on 1 April 2009, whereby a number of new unitary authorities were created in parts of the country which previously operated a 'two-tier' system of counties and districts. In five shire counties the functions of the county and district councils were combined into a single authority; and in two counties the powers of the county council were absorbed into a significantly reduced number of districts.

Administrative counties of England Former subnational divisions of England

Administrative counties were a level of subnational division of England used for the purposes of local government from 1889 to 1974. They were created by the Local Government Act 1888 as the areas for which county councils were elected. Some large counties were divided into several administrative counties, each with its own county council. The administrative counties were abolished by the Local Government Act 1972 and were replaced by the metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties of England.

Barton-upon-Irwell was, from 1894 to 1933, a rural district in the administrative county of Lancashire, England.

The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) was the statutory body established under the Local Government Act 1972 to settle the boundaries, names and electoral arrangements of the non-metropolitan districts which came into existence in 1974, and for their periodic review. The stated purpose of the LGBCE was to ensure "that the whole system does not get frozen into the form which has been adopted as appropriate in the 1970s". In the event it made no major changes and was replaced in 1992 by the Local Government Commission for England.

References

  1. ↑ Cmd. 6579
  2. ↑ "Back to Planning", The Times, 6 October 1945
  3. ↑ The Councillor's Handbook by H. Townshend-Rose and H. R. Page, 2nd Edition, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, London, 1946, pp. 6–7.
  4. ↑ London Gazette, issue no.37325, 26 October 1945
  5. 1 2 E. W. Gilbert , The Boundaries of Local Government Areas, The Geographical Journal , Vol. 111, No. 4/6. (April - June, 1948), pp. 172-198
  6. ↑ Local government boundaries - Commission's order of priority, The Times, 30 August 1946
  7. ↑ Review of local boundaries - first decisions in May, The Times, 23 April 1947
  8. ↑ Local boundaries (editorial), The Times, 23 April 1947
  9. ↑ Town and county boundaries - First decisions of the Commission, The Times, 2 May 1947
  10. ↑ Local government boundaries - Commission's proposals, The Times, 16 May 1947
  11. ↑ Report of the Local Government Boundary Commission for the year 1947
  12. ↑ Bruce Wood, "The Process of Local Government Reform 1966-1974", George Allen & Unwin, 1976, p. 46.
  13. ↑ The Times, 9 April 1948
  14. 1 2 Bruce Wood, "The Process of Local Government Reform 1966-1974", George Allen & Unwin, 1976, p. 36.
  15. ↑ Hansard , House of Commons 5th series, vol 463, col 74.
  16. ↑ "Repeal of Local Boundary Act - Commission to be wound up". The Times. 28 June 1949.
  17. ↑ "Retreat from reform". The Times. 28 June 1949.
  18. ↑ Local government - Call for revision of boundaries, The Times, 18 July 1951
  19. ↑ Review of local government - difficulties facing county boroughs, Malcolm Trustram Eve, Letter to the Editor of The Times, 24 July 1951
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.