Minitram

Last updated

Minitram was an automated guideway transit system studied by the Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL), part of the UK Department of the Environment's Ministry of Transport. The system was based on small, completely automated tram-like vehicles of about 25 passengers that could be connected together into three-car trains to increase capacity. Proposed designs were submitted by Hawker Siddeley Dynamics (HSD) and EASAMS (part of GEC). HSD's system used rubber wheels and EASAMS' steerable steel ones, but the projects were otherwise similar and notably shared a linear motor for propulsion and most braking. A series of failed sales efforts in the UK and to the GO-Urban system in Toronto, combined with decreased government spending in the 1970s, led to the concept being abandoned.

Contents

Background

During the 1960s a number of influential studies were published on the nature and future of mass transit systems. Primary among these were a series of reports from the US known collectively as the HUD reports. The HUD reports concluded that existing forms of transit could not compete with the convenience of car driving. If such systems were to be successful, they would need to offer tighter schedules to reduce waiting, smaller cars with fewer passengers, and more direct routing to eliminate intermediate stops. The result was the personal rapid transit concept, or PRT. [1]

The reports suggested the only way to offer all of these features would be to use extensive automation. Systems were imagined with driverless vehicles with sizes anywhere from three to 20 passengers, normally travelling at fixed speeds to reduce timing complexity, with stations built "offline" on sidings to allow traffic to bypass intermediate stops. Even with relatively slow cruise speeds, end-to-end trip times would be better than existing mass transit systems, and especially cars. [2]

The publication of the HUD reports, along with considerable development funding by the US Congress, led to major development efforts in most of the industrialized countries around the world. Four major developments were underway in the US, two in France, two in Germany, and two in Japan. The UK initially entered the fray with early studies on the Cabtrack system, but a political firestorm followed the publication of proposed station designs and the concept was abandoned. [3]

Minitram

Out of the ashes of the Cabtrack debacle came Minitram, designed to be technically simpler than Cabtrack, using on-line stations and scheduling and routing much more similar to conventional metro systems. The concept was no longer along the lines of the PRT systems, and was essentially a small metro system, with small 20 to 25-passenger cars that could automatically link together to reduce headway and thereby increase route capacity. This "automatic platooning" concept also allowed multiple routes in low-volume areas on the outskirts of the network to all feed into a small number of high-volume routes in the downtown cores. This was a topic of some research at the time, notably the French Aramis project. [4]

Initial studies by the TRRL demonstrated route capacities greater than Cabtrack, less construction for the same capacity, and better fare box returns. [5] The studies examined vehicles with 14 to 20 passengers running on elevated tracks with 30 second minimum headways, maximum speeds of 55 km/h and average speeds including stops of 40 km/h. [6] Several potential development sites were considered, including London's Docklands area [6] and between Croydon and New Addington. [7]

The most serious study was for a line in Sheffield which connected the city's spread-out shopping areas. A complete report on the route was published in 1974 by Robert Matthew Johnson-Marshall, calling for a total of 2.5 km of double-track forming roughly a U shape with nine stations. Peak capacity with three-car trains was 5,400 passengers per hour, reducing to as little as 180 per hour when running single cars at off-peak times with 5 minute headways. [8] The government also provided some money to British Rail to study a maglev solution along the same routes. [9]

On 22 May 1975 the Minister for Transport cancelled the system. He argued that the system was not ready for deployment, and the cancellation was final. His argument for final cancellation was to allow the city to consider other transportation options. [10] This eventually took the form of the existing Sheffield Supertram system, whose downtown route from City Hall to Park Grange follows the original Minitram route. [11]

The only other interest expressed in the Minitram system was by the GO-Urban development for Toronto. Hawker Siddeley Canada was already a major provider of equipment for Ontario, including both the H-series cars for the Toronto Transit Commission's subway system and the newly developed BiLevel Coach for GO Transit's regional rail networks. [12] After the initial downselect from 18 different proposals, the project selected the Ford ACT, Hawker's version of Minitram, and the Krauss-Maffei Transurban. Ford withdrew their system from the contest, leaving the two platooning systems (Transurban could operate in three-car trains) in the running. Given the high-tech goals of the project, it was considered a foregone conclusion that the Transurban would win the contest, as announced on 1 May 1973. [13]

Related Research Articles

Personal rapid transit Public transport mode

Personal rapid transit (PRT), also referred to as podcars or guided/railed taxis, is a public transport mode featuring small automated vehicles operating on a network of specially built guideways. PRT is a type of automated guideway transit (AGT), a class of system which also includes larger vehicles all the way to small subway systems. In terms of routing, it tends towards personal public transport systems.

Automated guideway transit Fully automated transit system

An automated guideway transit (AGT) or automated fixed-guideway transit or automatic quideway transit system is a type of fixed guideway transit infrastructure with a riding or suspesion track that supports and physically guides one or more driverless vehicles along its length. The vehicles are often rubber tired or steel wheeled, but other traction systems including air cushion, suspended monorail and maglev have been implemented. The guideway provides both physical support, like a road, as well as the guidance.

Bombardier Innovia Metro Automated rapid transit system

Innovia Metro is an automated rapid transit system manufactured by Bombardier Transportation. Innovia Metro systems run on conventional metal rails and pull power from a third rail, but are powered by a linear induction motor that provides traction by pulling on a "fourth rail" placed between the running rails. A new version of the technology being marketed by Bombardier is compatible with standard electric rotary propulsion.

Cabinentaxi, sometimes Cabintaxi in English, was a German people mover development project undertaken by Demag and Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm with funding and support from the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie. Cabinentaxi was designed to offer low-cost mass transit services where conventional systems, like a metro, would be too expensive to deploy due to low ridership or high capital costs.

Morgantown Personal Rapid Transit

Morgantown Personal Rapid Transit is a personal rapid transit (PRT) system in Morgantown, West Virginia, United States. The system connects the three Morgantown campuses of West Virginia University (WVU) and the city's downtown area.

Urban Transportation Development Corporation Canadian rolling stock and rail transport manufacturer

The Urban Transportation Development Corporation Ltd. (UTDC) was a Crown corporation owned by the Government of Ontario, Canada. It was established in the 1970s as a way to enter what was then expected to be a burgeoning market in advanced light rail mass transit systems. UTDC built a respected team of engineers and project managers. It developed significant expertise in linear propulsion, steerable trucks and driverless system controls which were integrated into a transit system known as the Intermediate Capacity Transit System (ICTS). It was designed to provide service at rider levels between a traditional subway on the upper end and buses and streetcars on the lower, filling a niche aimed at suburbs that were otherwise expensive to service.

ULTra (rapid transit) Personal rapid transit PODCAR system

Ultra is a personal rapid transit podcar system developed by the British engineering company Ultra Global PRT.

Headway is the distance or duration between vehicles in a transit system measured in space or time. The minimum headway is the shortest such distance or time achievable by a system without a reduction in the speed of vehicles. The precise definition varies depending on the application, but it is most commonly measured as the distance from the tip of one vehicle to the tip of the next one behind it. It can be expressed as the distance between vehicles, or as time it will take for the trailing vehicle to cover that distance. A "shorter" headway signifies closer spacing between the vehicles. Airplanes operate with headways measured in hours or days, freight trains and commuter rail systems might have headways measured in parts of an hour, metro and light rail systems operate with headways on the order of 90 seconds to 5 minutes, and vehicles on a freeway can have as little as 2 seconds headway between them.

SEA Underground Underground people mover system at Seattle–Tacoma International Airport

The SEA Underground, formerly called the Satellite Transit System (STS), is an automated people mover (APM) system operating in the Seattle–Tacoma International Airport in SeaTac, Washington, United States. Originally opening in 1973, the SEA Underground is the second oldest airport people mover system in the United States. The APM was designed to quickly transport passengers between the airport's Main Terminal and the North and South Satellites.

Cable Liner Cable-propelled automated people mover system

The Cable Liner is a range of automated people mover products designed by Doppelmayr Cable Car for use at airports, in city centers, intermodal passenger transport connections, park and ride facilities, campuses, resorts and amusement parks.

Vought Airtrans Former automated people mover at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport

LTV's (Vought) Airtrans was an automated people mover system that operated at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport between 1974 and 2005. The adaptable people mover was utilized for several separate systems: the Airport Train, Employee Train, American Airlines TrAAin and utility service. All systems utilized the same guideways and vehicle base but served different stations to create various routes.

The ACT, acronym for Automatically Controlled Transportation or Activity Center Transit, was a people mover system developed during the 1970s. One feature of the ACT is that it allowed bi-directional travel on a single rail—cars passed each other by switching onto short bypass lanes on the track, distributed where space allowed. ACT was a contender in the Urban Mass Transportation Administration's plan to deploy three or four systems in cities in the United States, as well as the GO-Urban project in Toronto, Canada. One ACT system was installed as a part of a Ford-funded real estate development near their headquarters in Dearborn, MI, and although they proposed to install ACT in several other locations, no additional systems were ever installed and the project was put on indefinite hold.

ROMAG was a personal rapid transit (PRT) system produced by the American company Rohr, Inc. It featured a linear induction motor that was arranged to provide both traction and suspension in a magnetic levitation system.

The HUD Reports were a series of studies in mass transit systems, funded by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) department of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HUD reports were extremely influential in the development of the personal rapid transit (PRT) concept, small pod-like vehicles that automatically travel from point-to-point in extended networks. Their publication in early 1968 sparked off PRT development projects at dozens of companies around the world. In spite of intense interest in the early 1970s, political winds shifted and today there is only one HUD-inspired PRT system in commercial operation, the Morgantown PRT in West Virginia.

The Computer-controlled Vehicle System, almost universally referred to as CVS, was a personal rapid transit (PRT) system developed by a Japanese industrial consortium during the 1970s. Like most PRT systems under design at the same time, CVS was based around a small four-person electric vehicle similar to a small minivan that could be requested on demand and drive directly to the user's destination. Unlike other PRT systems, however, CVS also offered cargo vehicles, included "dual-use" designs that could be manually driven off the PRT network, and included the ability to stop at intersections in a conventional road-like network.

Krauss-Maffei's Transurban was a 12-passenger automated guideway transit (AGT) mass transit system based on a maglev guideway. Development started in 1970 as one of the many AGT and PRT projects that followed in the wake of the HUD reports of 1968. Its selection as the basis of the GO-Urban system in Toronto in 1973 made it well known in the industry; it would have been the basis of the first large-area AGT mass transit network in the world. Technical problems cropped up during the construction of the test track, and the sudden removal of funding by the West German government led to the project's cancellation in late 1974. The Ontario government completed development and installation of a non-maglev version, today known as the Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit.

GO-Urban was a planned mass transit project for Greater Toronto to be operated by GO Transit. The system envisioned the use of automated guideway transit vehicles set up in hydro corridors and other unused parcels of land to provide rapid transit services without the expense of constructing tunnels. GO-Urban would serve high-density areas in the downtown core, but also be able to accelerate to high speed between distant stations in the outskirts of the city. Similar deployments were planned for Hamilton and Ottawa.

Dashaveyor Automated guideway transit (AGT) system developed during the 1960s and 70s

The Dashaveyor was an automated guideway transit (AGT) system developed during the 1960s and '70s.

UP Diliman Automated Guideway Transit System

The University of the Philippines Diliman AGT was an automated guideway transit (AGT) system constructed for technology demonstration within the campus of the University of the Philippines (UP) in Diliman, Quezon City in the Philippines. It served as a test track for the first mass transit system to be built and developed in the country by local engineers.

The Philippine government has commenced a project to develop a locally-designed and manufactured Automated Guideway Transit System (AGTS) through its Department of Science and Technology (DOST). Two prototype lines has been set up by the DOST, one within the University of the Philippines Diliman campus and another in Bicutan in Taguig.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ J. Edward Anderson, "Some Lessons from the History of Personal Rapid Transit", 4 August 1996
  2. ↑ J. Edward Anderson, "An Intelligent Transportation Network System", April 2011
  3. ↑ AGT 1975, p. 236.
  4. ↑ AGT 1975, p. 238.
  5. ↑ TRRL 1976, p. 22.
  6. 1 2 New Scientist 1973, p. 606.
  7. ↑ New Scientist 1976, p. 447.
  8. ↑ AGT 1975, p. 219.
  9. ↑ AGT 1975, p. 218.
  10. ↑ AGT 1975, p. 220.
  11. ↑ David Banister, "Transport and Urban Development", Taylor & Francis, 1995, p. 179
  12. ↑ Daniel Garcia and James Bow, "The Bi-Level Coaches", Transit Toronto, 10 November 2006
  13. ↑ Mike Filey, "Toronto Sketches 5: The Way We Were", Dundurn Press, 1997, p. 39

Bibliography

Further reading

  • "Minitram in Sheffield: A Report of Civil Engineering, Planning and Operational Studies to Examine the Feasibility of Minitram System in the Centre of Sheffield", Robert Matthew, Johnson-Marshall and Partners, 1974
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.