Ontario Municipal Board

Last updated

The Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) was an independent administrative board, operated as an adjudicative tribunal, [1] in the province of Ontario, Canada. It heard applications and appeals on municipal and planning disputes, [2] as well as other matters specified in provincial legislation. The tribunal reported to the Ministry of the Attorney General from 2012 until it was replaced in 2018. [3] The Board had been criticized for its broad powers and authority to override the Planning Act decisions of municipal councils. [4]

Contents

The Ontario Municipal Board was replaced by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal on April 3, 2018, [5] which was intended to have more limited powers and a reduced scope. [6] The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal was in turn replaced by the Ontario Land Tribunal on June 1, 2021. [7] [8]

History

The OMB was established in 1906 as the Ontario Railway and Municipal Board [9] "to oversee municipalities' accounts and to supervise the then rapidly growing rail transportation system between and within municipalities." [10] In so doing, it took over responsibility of these functions from the former Railway Committee of the Executive Council [11] and Office of the Provincial Municipal Auditor. [10] [12] It was amalgamated with the Bureau of Municipal Affairs [13] and given its current name in 1932. [14]

In 2010, under the Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, 2009, [15] the OMB was designated as part of a cluster known as "Environment and Land Tribunals Ontario", [16] which also includes the Assessment Review Board, boards of negotiation under the Expropriations Act, the Conservation Review Board and the Environmental Review Tribunal. [17]

Scope of jurisdiction

The OMB was constituted under the Ontario Municipal Board Act, [18] (OMB Act) which conferred "exclusive jurisdiction in all cases and in respect of all matters in which jurisdiction is conferred on it by this Act or by any other general or special Act". [19] Until 2009, its decisions could be appealed by petition to the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, [20] but such petitions were abolished by the Good Government Act, 2009, [21] after which decisions of the OMB were final, subject only to appeals to the Divisional Court on a question of law with that Court's leave. [22]

While the Act declared that the Board "has all the powers of a court of record", [23] in 1938 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that it is not a superior court, but in pith and substance an administrative body. [24] Appeals to the OMB were described as "a process requiring the OMB to exercise its public interest mandate", and "on an appeal the Board had the obligation to exercise its independent judgment". [25]

The Board had general jurisdiction in municipal matters, [26] as well as over provincially-regulated railways and public utilities [27] (other than matters that are within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Energy Board). [28] It had been conferred further powers under the Railways Act, [29] the Municipal Act [30] the City of Toronto Act , [31] the Planning Act [32] and the Ontario Heritage Act . [33]

Procedure

Hearings

Before reaching a decision, the OMB conducted hearings, which were in oral, electronic or written form. [34] Where a matter to be heard was expected to be long or complex, involving many issues, parties and types of evidence, the Board normally held a prehearing to help organize proceedings for subsequent hearings, which included identification of issues to be considered at such hearings. [35] The Board expected parties who placed an issue on the Issue List to call a case in support of that issue. [36]

The Board could award costs against parties who opposed successful applicants, but only when it was requested to do so. [37]

Decisions

The Archives of Ontario holds some past OMB decisions, but the collection is limited to the years 1906–1991 (but certain records in that period have been previously destroyed). [38]

The OMB makes the following jurisprudence available online: [39]

  • Decisions from 2001 to the present.
  • Orders from January 21, 2013, to the present.

Carswell publishes Ontario Municipal Board Reports, [40] which is available in law libraries, as well as online at Westlaw. [41] Decisions are also available online at LexisNexis. [42]

Criticism

The jurisdiction the Board could exercise was extremely broad in scope, and a Royal Commission inquiry headed by James McRuer reported in 1971 that it was impossible to catalogue all the powers that the Board possessed at that time, [43] although thirty principal Acts were identified. [44] However, an extraordinary provision of the OMB Act allowed for investigation and determination of any matter, where provision was made for it under the letters patent of any corporation formed under Ontario law. [45] [46]

Another provision of the OMB Act, allowing the Board to require or prohibit the performance of any matter under any Act or agreement, was considered to be "an absurdly broad power and in its breadth it is unconstitutional". [47] [48]

The Board tended to subordinate both provincial and local policies to those of its own making, [49] which successive governments effectively transformed into a policy "of overseeing municipal activities without direct provincial involvement". [49] There was discussion as to whether it had outlived its usefulness as a planning review tribunal, [50] as "it does little that could not be done by local decision makers". [51]

On October 7, 2008, City of Toronto councillors representing the former city of North York voted to name a lane "OMB Folly" in the area where the OMB, against the city's wishes, approved development of a condominium and townhouse complex near a low-density residential area immediately west of North York Centre. [52] [53] However, Council reversed this decision on 26 August 2010.

After a controversial 2009 decision approved a community of up to 1,400 homes in the Manotick neighbourhood of Ottawa, Minister of Municipal Affairs Jim Watson was quoted in the local press as stating: "Has the OMB been perfect? No. Can it improve? Yes, I think it can and I am quite prepared to work with the attorney general to try and ensure that the OMB is more reflective of community values [...] I've had a couple of discussions with the attorney general going back a month and we both agree we are going to take a thorough look at the OMB and see how we can further improve it based on changes we made a couple of years ago. We want to see if they've done what we hoped they'd do to bring greater balance to OMB decision-making." [54]

On February 6, 2012, Toronto City Council asked the province to free the city from the Ontario Municipal Board's jurisdiction. Council endorsed the proposal in a 34–5 vote. Spearheaded by councillor Josh Matlow, along with councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam. Matlow is quoted in the Toronto Star : "We've heard time and time again from our residents that there's an inequitable playing field...Developers simply have a better chance at the OMB because they have the financial resources, the ability to get planners and lawyers, anything they need to be able to argue their case". This proposal should open the door for discussion of the efficiency and justice of the unelected board that controls the majority of Ontario developments. [55]

Related Research Articles

In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal legal cases. A superior court is "superior" in relation to a court with limited jurisdiction, which is restricted to civil cases involving monetary amounts with a specific limit, or criminal cases involving offenses of a less serious nature. A superior court may hear appeals from lower courts. For courts of general jurisdiction in civil law system, see ordinary court.

Small-claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants. Courts authorized to try small claims may also have other judicial functions, and go by different names in different jurisdictions. For example, it may be known as a county or magistrate's court. These courts can be found in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Greece, New Zealand, Philippines, Scotland, Singapore, South Africa, Nigeria and the United States.

<i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Primary constitutional document of Canada

The Constitution Act, 1867, originally enacted as the British North America Act, 1867, is a major part of the Constitution of Canada. The act created a federal dominion and defines much of the operation of the Government of Canada, including its federal structure, the House of Commons, the Senate, the justice system, and the taxation system. In 1982, with the patriation of the Constitution, the British North America Acts which were originally enacted by the British Parliament, including this Act, were renamed. However, the acts are still known by their original names in records of the United Kingdom. Amendments were also made at this time: section 92A was added, giving provinces greater control over non-renewable natural resources.

The Federal Court of Canada, which succeeded the Exchequer Court of Canada in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the federal government's legislative jurisdiction. Originally composed of two divisions, the Appellate Division and the Trial Division, in 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. The jurisdiction and powers of the two courts remained largely unchanged from the predecessor divisions.

The court system of Canada forms the country's judiciary, formally known as "The King on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ontario Court of Justice</span> Canadian provincial court

The Ontario Court of Justice is the provincial court of record for the Canadian province of Ontario. The court sits at more than 200 locations across the province and oversees matters relating to family law, criminal law, and provincial offences.

<i>Ontario Heritage Act</i> Canadian act

The Ontario Heritage Act, first enacted on March 5, 1975, allows municipalities and the provincial government to designate individual properties and districts in the Canadian Province of Ontario, as being of cultural heritage value or interest.

A quasi-judicial body is a non-judicial body which can interpret law. It is an entity such as an arbitration panel or tribunal board, which can be a public administrative agency but also a contract- or private law entity, which has been given powers and procedures resembling those of a court of law or judge and which is obliged to objectively determine facts and draw conclusions from them so as to provide the basis of an official action. Such actions are able to remedy a situation or impose legal penalties, and they may affect the legal rights, duties or privileges of specific parties.

The Ontario Civilian Police Commission, previously known as the Ontario Police Commission and the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services, is an independent quasi-judicial agency. It is one of the 13 adjudicative tribunals overseen by the Ministry of the Attorney General that make up Tribunals Ontario. The OCPC hears appeals, adjudicates applications, conducts investigations and resolves disputes regarding the oversight and provision of policing services in Ontario.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal government of Toronto</span> Local government of the City of Toronto

The municipal government of Toronto is the local government responsible for administering the city of Toronto in the Canadian province of Ontario. Its structure and powers are set out in the City of Toronto Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian administrative law</span> Law governing the government agencies of Canada

Canadian administrative law is the body of law that addresses the actions and operations of governments and governmental agencies in Canada. That is, the law concerns the manner in which courts can review the decisions of administrative decision makers such as a board, tribunal, commission, agency, or Crown minister, while exercising ministerial discretion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Canada</span>

Human rights in Canada have come under increasing public attention and legal protection since World War II. Prior to that time, there were few legal protections for human rights. The protections which did exist focused on specific issues, rather than taking a general approach to human rights.

The Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario is an independent office of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in the Canadian province of Ontario.

<i>Paul v British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Paul v British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission), 2003 SCC 55, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision in administrative law and aboriginal law. The case stands for the proposition that a provincial administrative actor granted the power to determine questions of law may adjudicate matters within federal legislative competence, including s. 35 aboriginal rights matters.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario is an administrative tribunal in Ontario, Canada that hears and determines applications brought under the Ontario Human Rights Code, the provincial statute that sets out human or civil rights in Ontario prohibiting discrimination on the basis of a number of grounds in certain social areas. It is one of the 13 adjudicative tribunals overseen by the Ministry of the Attorney General that make up Tribunals Ontario. Any person who believes they have been discriminated against under the Human Rights Code may bring an application to the Tribunal.

The Landlord and Tenant Board is an adjudicative tribunal operating in the province of Ontario that provides dispute resolution of landlord and tenant matters under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. It is one of the 13 adjudicative tribunals overseen by the Ministry of the Attorney General that make up Tribunals Ontario.

<i>Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (AG)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (AG), 2014 SCC 40 is a significant case from the Supreme Court of Canada in the area of Canadian administrative law, focusing on whether the standard of review framework set out in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick applies to decisions of the Governor in Council of Canada (i.e., the Cabinet of Canada), and whether it has authority to vary or rescind an administrative tribunal decision on questions of law or jurisdiction.

Section 92(14) of the Constitution Act, 1867, also known as the administration of justice power, grants the provincial legislatures of Canada the authority to legislate on:

14. The Administration of Justice in the Province, including the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of Provincial Courts, both of Civil and of Criminal Jurisdiction, and including Procedure in Civil Matters in those Courts.

The Animal Care Review Board is an independent, quasi-judicial agency in Ontario, Canada. It is one of 13 adjudicative tribunals under the Ministry of the Attorney General that make up Tribunals Ontario.

The Ontario Parole Board is an independent inquisitorial agency in Ontario, Canada. It is one of 13 adjudicative tribunals under the Ministry of the Attorney General that make up Tribunals Ontario.

References

  1. ↑ Meyfarth O’Hara 2008.
  2. ↑ Sewell 2009, pp. 18–20.
  3. ↑ "Citizens' Guide 6 - Ontario Municipal Board". Citizens' Guides to Land-use Planning. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  4. ↑ Pagliaro, Jennifer; Osorio, Carlos (February 17, 2017). "Contested Development". Toronto Star. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  5. ↑ "The Ontario Municipal Board will soon be no more. Here's what that means for you". CBC News. April 2, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2018.
  6. ↑ "Ontario Newsroom".
  7. ↑ "Come one, come all! Ontario establishes new 'super tribunal' to hear land and environmental matters: The Ontario Land Tribunal". June 2021.
  8. ↑ "About the OLT".
  9. ↑ The Ontario Railway and Municipal Board Act, 1906 , S.O. 1906, c. 31
  10. 1 2 "History of the OMB". Ontario Municipal Board. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  11. ↑ constituted under An Act respecting Electric Railways , S.O. 1902, c. 27
  12. ↑ constituted under An Act respecting Provincial Municipal Auditors , S.O. 1896, c. 54 (repealed by The Statute Law Amendment Act, 1913 , S.O. 1913, c. 18, s. 49 )
  13. ↑ constituted under The Bureau of Municipal Affairs Act , S.O. 1917, c. 14
  14. ↑ The Ontario Municipal Board Act, 1932 , S.O. 1932, c. 27
  15. ↑ Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, 2009 , S.O. 2009, c. 33, Sch. 5
  16. ↑ "About ELTO". Environment and Land Tribunals Ontario.
  17. ↑ Adjudicative tribunals and clusters , O. Reg. 126/10
  18. ↑ Ontario Municipal Board Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. O.28
  19. ↑ OMB Act, s. 36
  20. ↑ Ontario Municipal Board Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. O.28, s. 95
  21. ↑ Good Government Act, 2009 , S.O. 2009, c. 33, Sch. 2 , s. 54
  22. ↑ OMB Act, s. 96
  23. ↑ OMB Act, s. 34
  24. ↑ The Corporation of the City of Toronto v The Corporation of the Township of York [1938] JCPC 5 , [1938] AC 415(24 January 1938)(Ontario)
  25. ↑ Ottawa (City) v Minto Communities Inc, 2009 CanLII 65802 at par. 30(13 November 2009), Divisional Court (Ontario,Canada)
  26. ↑ OMB Act, Part IV
  27. ↑ OMB Act, Part V
  28. ↑ OMB Act, s. 103
  29. ↑ The Railways Act , R.S.O. 1950, c. 331
  30. ↑ Municipal Act, 2001 , S.O. 2001, c. 25
  31. ↑ City of Toronto Act, 2006 , S.O. 2006, c. 11, Sch. A
  32. ↑ Planning Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13
  33. ↑ Ontario Heritage Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18
  34. ↑ Information Sheet 4: Here's what you need to know about Hearings (PDF). OMB. 2012. ISBN   978-1-4435-3451-2.
  35. ↑ "Information Sheet 7: Here's what you need to know about Prehearings" (PDF). OMB. 2008.
  36. ↑ "IN THE MATTER of Motions regarding the proposed Issue List, brought by the City of Waterloo and by Spring Village Inc. (Case PL080463)" (PDF). OMB. July 13, 2009.
  37. ↑ "IN THE MATTER OF subsection 97(1) of the Ontario Municipal Board Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.28, as amended, with respect to applications for costs relating to a series of approvals obtained by Kimvar Enterprises Inc. (Case PL050290)" (PDF). OMB. January 30, 2009.
  38. ↑ archives.gov.on.ca: "A Guide to Researching Records of Ontario Municipal Board Hearings" Feb 2013
  39. ↑ "E-Decisions". OMB.
  40. ↑ "Ontario Municipal Board Reports". Ontario Municipal Board Reports. Second Series. Carswell. ISSN   0318-7527 . Retrieved June 17, 2014.
  41. ↑ "Westlaw Next Canada: Case Law" (PDF). Thomson Reuters.
  42. ↑ "Quicklaw Source Directory: Administrative Board and Tribunal Decisions". LexisNexis.
  43. ↑ McRuer 1971, p. 2015.
  44. ↑ McRuer 1971, pp. 2015, 2045–2067.
  45. ↑ McRuer 1971, pp. 2020–2021.
  46. ↑ still in effect under the OMB Act, s. 48
  47. ↑ McRuer 1971, pp. 2024–2025.
  48. ↑ still in effect under the OMB Act, s. 39
  49. 1 2 Chipman 2002, p. 193.
  50. ↑ Chipman 2002, p. 202.
  51. ↑ Chipman 2002, p. 203.
  52. ↑ Moloney, Paul (October 8, 2008). "It's street revenge on developer". Toronto Star. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  53. ↑ "Councillors Try To Name Street OMB Folly As Form Of Protest". CityNews.ca. October 8, 2008. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  54. ↑ Adam, Mohammed (April 15, 2009). "Watson calls for further changes at OMB". Ottawa Citizen. Canwest. Retrieved April 21, 2009.
  55. ↑ "Toronto asks to opt out of Ontario Municipal Board". Toronto Star. February 7, 2012. Retrieved June 7, 2012.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.