Oslo Principles

Last updated
Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations
Created2014
PresentedMarch 1, 2015
Author(s)Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations
PurposeDefine the scope of legal obligations of states and enterprises relevant to climate change
Also known as the Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations and the Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change

The Oslo Principles, formally the Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change, are a set of principles identifying the legal obligations of states (and companies) to limit climate change, as well as means of meeting these obligations. [1] Written by an international group of legal experts, the Principles’ goal is to limit the rise in average global temperature to 2 degrees Celsius. The Oslo Principles were presented on March 30 at King’s College London. [2]

Contents

The Oslo Principles draw on human rights law, international law, national environmental law and tort law to make the case that States and enterprises have an obligation to mitigate climate change under existing legal systems. [3] [4]

The rationale behind the Oslo Principles is that human rights includes the rights to life, food, water and a clean environment. As there is scientific consensus that these rights are under threat of climate change, continuing present carbon emissions trajectories will violate human rights. [5] As human rights law is internationally legally binding, states and companies have an obligation to reduce carbon emissions even in the absence of a specific treaty. [2] [3] Additionally, international law recognizes the responsibility of a state’s activity across an international border, which is applicable to greenhouse gas emissions. [6]

A major court ruling in line with the Oslo Principles is State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation , in which the court in The Hague ruled that the Dutch government has a legal obligation to reduce domestic carbon emissions to protect the human rights of its citizens. [7]

Principles

The Oslo Principles depart from the precautionary principle. [8] [4] Given the scientific consensus on the harms of anthropogenic climate change, greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced sufficiently to protect against the threat of climate change. The level of reduction to avoid these threats should be based on scientific “credible and realistic worst-case scenario”. [8]

Obligations of states and enterprises

Under the Oslo Principles, both states and enterprises have the obligation to ensure that global warming is limited to 2 degrees Celsius. [9] For this, they must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions “without relevant additional cost”. [10] Additionally, states and enterprises ought to refrain from starting new activities that cause excessive emissions, such as building coal-fired power stations. [11]

Additionally, the Principles state that developed and developing countries, and enterprises within them, must take measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when the costs of these measures will be offset by savings or financial gain. This principle applies to least developed countries, and enterprises within them, only when other entities provide the technical and financial means. [12]

Despite obligations on the amount of greenhouse gas emissions required, states and enterprises can decide themselves on which measures they use to achieve their obligations. [13]

The Oslo Principles state that all countries are subject to these obligations, no matter their contribution to total greenhouse gas emissions. [14] When national law or international agreements set out lower targets, the obligations under the Oslo Principles are not affected. [15]

Obligations of states

States are required to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to its permissible level as fast as reasonably possible within their jurisdiction. [16] The Oslo Principles state that the obligations of states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are common, but differentiated: least developed countries are not obliged to pay for greenhouse gas emissions themselves. [17] Countries that are close to their allowed level of emissions are not obligated to reduce their emissions if it would be too difficult considering its wealth, needs, fossil fuel dependence and possibilities for renewable energy. [18] Countries that emit less than they are allowed still have a duty to avoid increasing emissions as the quantum of greenhouse gas emissions will go down over time. States must refrain from providing financing to projects that will increase greenhouse gas emissions unnecessarily high. [19]

If a country fails to reduce its emissions sufficiently despite its efforts, it must finance further emissions in countries that are below their maximum allowed emissions. [20] A lack of financial means does not allow a state to forgo its obligations, and states have an obligation to research ways to reduce emissions if they will likely not meet its obligations. [21] Additionally, countries have the responsibility to enact trade consequences for countries that fail to meet their obligations. [22]

States are also procedurally obliged to accept the jurisdiction of courts and publish information on climate change risks. [23]

Obligations of enterprises

Enterprises are obliged to assess their vulnerability to climate change and ways to increase their resilience. This information must be public and accessible to stakeholders such as investors, clients and regulators. [24] Fossil fuel companies specifically, must assess how restrictions on fossil fuel extraction will affect its financial situation. [25]

Enterprises have to consider the greenhouse gas effects in projects they are considering to finance and must conduct environmental impact assessments when building major new facilities. [26]

Creation

The Oslo Principles were adopted by the Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations, which consists of experts in international law, human rights law, environmental law and tort law from universities, international courts and legal organisations. The members of this group participated in their individual capacities. The Principles are named after the city of Oslo, Norway, as this is where the authors came to consensus in 2014.

The expert group consisted of:

Reception

Guardian editor Julia Powles and climate lawyer Tessa Khan described the Oslo Principles in The Guardian as a "solution to our infuriating impasse" on government inaction on climate change. [3]

Leiden University professor Ingrid Leijten called the Principles a "notable and welcome effort" in discovering an under-explored path to effectively addressing climate change. While still unsure about the legal status of the document, she described it as "further aid for reaching a sound legal conclusion" for the State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation court case. [4]

Satvindar Nagra criticised the Oslo Principles for neglecting to engage with the legal implications of climate change displacement under international human rights law and refugee law. [27]

The Oslo Principles primarily focus on the obligations of states over states over enterprises. To further specify the obligations of enterprises, the principles have been complemented by the Principles on Climate Obligations of Enterprises in 2020. Part of the authors of the Oslo Principles also worked on these new principles. [1] [2] [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kyoto Protocol</span> 1997 international treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

The Kyoto Protocol (Japanese: 京都議定書, Hepburn: Kyōto Giteisho) was an international treaty which extended the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits state parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and that human-made CO2 emissions are driving it. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997 and entered into force on 16 February 2005. There were 192 parties (Canada withdrew from the protocol, effective December 2012) to the Protocol in 2020.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is the UN process for negotiating an agreement to limit dangerous climate change. It is an international treaty among countries to combat "dangerous human interference with the climate system". The main way to do this is limiting the increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It was signed in 1992 by 154 states at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), informally known as the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro. The treaty entered into force on 21 March 1994. "UNFCCC" is also the name of the Secretariat charged with supporting the operation of the convention, with offices on the UN Campus in Bonn, Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon offsets and credits</span> Carbon dioxide reduction scheme

Carbon offsetting is a carbon trading mechanism that enables entities such as governments or businesses to compensate for (i.e. "offset") their greenhouse gas emissions by investing in projects that reduce, avoid, or remove emissions elsewhere. When an entity invests in a carbon offsetting program, it receives carbon credits. These "tokens" are then used to account for net climate benefits from one entity to another. A carbon credit or offset credit can be bought or sold after certification by a government or independent certification body. One carbon offset or credit represents a reduction, avoidance or removal of one metric Tonne of carbon dioxide or its carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon accounting</span> Processes used to measure how much carbon dioxide equivalents an organization sequesters or emits

Carbon accounting is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas (GHG) an organization emits. It can also be used to track projects or actions to reduce emissions in sectors such as forestry or renewable energy. Corporations, cities and other groups use these techniques to help limit climate change. Organizations will often set an emissions baseline, create targets for reducing emissions, and track progress towards them. The accounting methods enable them to do this in a more consistent and transparent manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions</span> Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before. Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2022 were 703 GtC, of which 484±20 GtC from fossil fuels and industry, and 219±60 GtC from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2022, coal 32%, oil 24%, and gas 10%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate justice</span> Term linking the climate crisis with environmental and social justice

Climate justice is an approach to climate action that focuses on the unequal impacts of climate change on marginalized or otherwise vulnerable populations. Climate justice wants to achieve an equitable distribution of both the burdens of climate change and the efforts to mitigate climate change. Climate justice is a type of environmental justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IPCC Fifth Assessment Report</span> Intergovernmental report on climate change

The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the fifth in a series of such reports and was completed in 2014. As had been the case in the past, the outline of the AR5 was developed through a scoping process which involved climate change experts from all relevant disciplines and users of IPCC reports, in particular representatives from governments. Governments and organizations involved in the Fourth Report were asked to submit comments and observations in writing with the submissions analysed by the panel. Projections in AR5 are based on "Representative Concentration Pathways" (RCPs). The RCPs are consistent with a wide range of possible changes in future anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Projected changes in global mean surface temperature and sea level are given in the main RCP article.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 United Nations Climate Change Conference</span>

The 2008 United Nations Climate Change Conference took place at PIF Congress Centre, Poznań International Fair (PIF), in Poznań, Poland, between December 1 and December 12, 2008. Representatives from over 180 countries attended along with observers from intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by Australia</span> Release of gases from Australia which contribute to global warming

Greenhouse gas emissions by Australia totalled 533 million tonnes CO2-equivalent based on greenhouse gas national inventory report data for 2019; representing per capita CO2e emissions of 21 tons, three times the global average. Coal was responsible for 30% of emissions. The national Greenhouse Gas Inventory estimates for the year to March 2021 were 494.2 million tonnes, which is 27.8 million tonnes, or 5.3%, lower than the previous year. It is 20.8% lower than in 2005. According to the government, the result reflects the decrease in transport emissions due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, reduced fugitive emissions, and reductions in emissions from electricity; however, there were increased greenhouse gas emissions from the land and agriculture sectors.

The climate change policy of the United States has major impacts on global climate change and global climate change mitigation. This is because the United States is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gasses in the world after China, and is among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person in the world. Cumulatively, the United States has emitted over a trillion metric tons of greenhouse gases, more than any country in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United Kingdom</span> Overview of the greenhouse gas emissions by United Kingdom

In 2021, net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United Kingdom (UK) were 427 million tonnes (Mt) carbon dioxide equivalent, 80% of which was carbon dioxide itself. Emissions increased by 5% in 2021 with the easing of COVID-19 restrictions, primarily due to the extra road transport. The UK has over time emitted about 3% of the world total human caused CO2, with a current rate under 1%, although the population is less than 1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris Agreement</span> 2015 international treaty on climate change

The Paris Agreement is an international treaty on climate change that was adopted in 2015. The treaty covers climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. The Paris Agreement was negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference near Paris, France. As of February 2023, 195 members of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are parties to the agreement. Of the three UNFCCC member states which have not ratified the agreement, the only major emitter is Iran. The United States withdrew from the agreement in 2020, but rejoined in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Europe</span> Emissions, impacts and responses of Europe related to climate change

Climate change has resulted in an increase in temperature of 2.3 °C (4.14 °F) (2022) in Europe compared to pre-industrial levels. Europe is the fastest warming continent in the world. Europe's climate is getting warmer due to anthropogenic activity. According to international climate experts, global temperature rise should not exceed 2 °C to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change; without reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, this could happen before 2050. Climate change has implications for all regions of Europe, with the extent and nature of impacts varying across the continent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights and climate change</span>

Human rights and climate change is a conceptual and legal framework under which international human rights and their relationship to global warming are studied, analyzed, and addressed. The framework has been employed by governments, United Nations organizations, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, human rights and environmental advocates, and academics to guide national and international policy on climate change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the core international human rights instruments. In 2022 Working Group II of the IPCC suggested that "climate justice comprises justice that links development and human rights to achieve a rights-based approach to addressing climate change".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon budget</span> Limit on carbon dioxide emission for a given climate impact

A carbon budget is a concept used in climate policy to help set emissions reduction targets in a fair and effective way. It examines the "maximum amount of cumulative net global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions that would result in limiting global warming to a given level". It can be expressed relative to the pre-industrial period. In this case, it is the total carbon budget. Or it can be expressed from a recent specified date onwards. In that case it is the remaining carbon budget.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change litigation</span> Use of legal practice to further climate change mitigation

Climate change litigation, also known as climate litigation, is an emerging body of environmental law using legal practice to set case law precedent to further climate change mitigation efforts from public institutions, such as governments and companies. In the face of slow climate change politics delaying climate change mitigation, activists and lawyers have increased efforts to use national and international judiciary systems to advance the effort. Climate litigation typically engages in one of five types of legal claims: Constitutional law, administrative law, private law (challenging corporations or other organizations for negligence, nuisance, etc., fraud or consumer protection, or human rights.

The history of climate change policy and politics refers to the continuing history of political actions, policies, trends, controversies and activist efforts as they pertain to the issue of climate change. Climate change emerged as a political issue in the 1970s, when activist and formal efforts sought to address environmental crises on a global scale. International policy regarding climate change has focused on cooperation and the establishment of international guidelines to address global warming. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is a largely accepted international agreement that has continuously developed to meet new challenges. Domestic policy on climate change has focused on both establishing internal measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and incorporating international guidelines into domestic law.

<i>State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation</i> Dutch court case about carbon dioxide emissions

State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation (2019) is climate change litigation heard by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands related to government efforts to curtail carbon dioxide emissions. The case was brought against the Dutch government in 2013, arguing the government, by not meeting a minimum carbon dioxide emission-reduction goal established by scientists to avert harmful climate change, was endangering the human rights of Dutch citizens as set by national and European Union laws.

<i>Lliuya v RWE AG</i>

Lliuya v RWE AG (2015) Case No. 2 O 285/15 is a German tort law and climate litigation case, concerning liability for climate damage in Peru from a melting glacier, against Germany's largest coal burning power company, RWE, which has caused approximately 0.47% of all historic greenhouse gas emissions. It is currently on appeal in the Upper State Court, Oberlandesgericht Hamm.

<i>Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd</i>

Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [2024] NZSC 5 is a landmark New Zealand tort law case, concerning liability of major fossil fuel polluters for climate damage. The NZ Supreme Court held that polluting companies could be liable in tort to pay damages from global warming and rising sea levels to people whose coastal property is damaged, overturning courts below.

References

  1. 1 2 Spier, Jaap (2017-11-27). "The Oslo Principles and the Enterprises Principles: Legal Strategies to Come to Grips with Climate Change". Journal of European Tort Law. 8 (2): 218–237. doi:10.1515/jetl-2017-0007. ISSN   1868-9620. S2CID   132177467. Archived from the original on 2022-07-02. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  2. 1 2 3 "Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations | Global Justice Program". globaljustice.yale.edu. Archived from the original on 2022-05-16. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  3. 1 2 3 "Climate change: at last a breakthrough to our catastrophic political impasse? | Julia Powles and Tessa Khan". the Guardian. 2015-03-30. Archived from the original on 2022-05-25. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  4. 1 2 3 Leijten, Ingrid (April 26, 2015). "Climate Change and the Oslo Principles: Judicial Activism or the Problem with Politics?". Leiden Law Bog. Archived from the original on March 7, 2021. Retrieved July 2, 2022.
  5. ↑ "Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations". Investors' Corner. 2016-04-25. Archived from the original on 2022-07-02. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  6. ↑ Pogge, Thomas; Spier, Jaap; Gerrard, Michael (March 30, 2015). "Legal Experts Release Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations" (PDF) (Press release). Archived (PDF) from the original on January 17, 2021. Retrieved July 2, 2022.
  7. ↑ Supreme Court of the Netherlands (2019). "Dutch State to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by the end of 2020". Archived from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved July 2, 2022.
  8. 1 2 Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 1 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  9. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 6 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 7 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 8 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 9 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 10 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 11 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 12 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 13 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  17. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, 14, 15 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 16 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  19. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 17 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  20. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 18 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principles 22, 23 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  22. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 20 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  23. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principles 25, 26 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  24. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 27 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  25. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principle 28 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  26. ↑ Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations, Principles 29, 30 (PDF). Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. 2015. Archived 2021-10-31 at the Wayback Machine
  27. ↑ Nagra, Satvindar (2017). "The Oslo Principles and Climate Change Displacement: Missed Opportunity or Misplaced Expectations?". Carbon & Climate Law Review. 11 (2): 120–135. doi:10.21552/cclr/2017/2/8. ISSN   1864-9904. JSTOR   26353860. Archived from the original on 2022-07-02. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  28. ↑ "Climate Principles for Enterprises". Climate Principles for Enterprises. Archived from the original on 2022-05-16. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.