Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution

Last updated

The Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution is a proposed change to the United States Constitution. The amendment's advocates say that it will allow parents' rights to direct the upbringing of their children, protected from federal interference, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Amendment was first proposed during the 110th Congress as House Joint Resolution 97 in July 2008, but no action was taken during that Congress. The Amendment has been described as a "wedge issue" and part of the culture wars. [1]

Contents

Text

The current language (as proposed in H.J.Res.36) is as follows:

SECTION 1

The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.

SECTION 2
The parental right to direct education includes the right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices within public schools for one's child.

SECTION 3
Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.

SECTION 4
The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall not be denied or abridged on account of disability.

SECTION 5

This article shall not be construed to apply to a parental action or decision that would end life.

Legislative history

110th Congress (2007–2008)

The Parental Rights Amendment was proposed by Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) as H.J. Res. 97 on June 26, 2008, but had no additional sponsors. On July 28, 2008, it was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. [2]

111th Congress (2009–2010)

The Parental Rights Amendment was proposed by Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) on March 31, 2009, and numbered H.J.Res.42. On April 27, 2009, it was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. It garnered 141 cosponsors. [3]

In the Senate, an identical bill (which was numbered S.J.Res.13) was introduced by Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) on March 3, 2009, but had no additional sponsors. It was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. [4]

On May 14, 2009, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) proposed the Parental Rights Amendment with an additional section clarifying that "This article shall take effect after the date of ratification." It was numbered S.J.Res.16; it was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It received 6 cosponsors. [5]

112th Congress (2011–2012)

The Parental Rights Amendment was proposed multiple times in the 112th Congress.

On January 5, 2011, Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) proposed the Parental Rights Amendment without the additional section added in S.J.Res.16; it was numbered H.J.Res.3. It was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution on January 24, 2011. It received 17 cosponsors. [6]

On March 29, 2012, Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, proposed the Parental Rights Amendment with a slightly modified first section; it was numbered H.J.Res.107. It was also referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution on April 9, 2012. It received 21 cosponsors. [7]

On June 5, 2012, Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) again proposed the Parental Rights Amendment with a slightly modified first section and an additional section clarifying that "This article shall not be construed to apply to a parental action or decision that would end life"; it was numbered H.J.Res.110. On June 18, it was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, and on July 18, subcommittee hearings were held. It received 85 cosponsors. [8]

In the Senate, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) proposed a resolution identical to H.J.Res.110 on June 5, 2012; it was numbered S.J.Res.42. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It received 12 cosponsors. [9]

113th Congress (2013–2014)

The Parental Rights Amendment was proposed, with the first section expanded into two sections, by Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) on June 18, 2013, and numbered H.J.Res.50. It was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice. It received 80 cosponsors. [10]

In the Senate, the Parental Rights Amendment was proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on June 4, 2014, with identical wording as in the House. It was numbered S.J.Res.37. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It received 5 cosponsors. [11]

114th Congress (2015–2016)

The Parental Rights Amendment was again proposed by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), with modified wording; it was numbered H.J.Res.91. It was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice on May 17, 2016. It currently has 10 cosponsors. [12]

In the Senate, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) proposed the Parental Rights Amendment with its current wording on June 29, 2016. It was numbered S.J.Res.36. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It had 5 cosponsors as of July 25, 2016. [13]

115th Congress (2017–2018)

The Parental Rights Amendment was again proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) with its current wording on August 1, 2017. It was numbered S.J.Res.48. It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It had 5 cosponsors as of August 1, 2017. [14]

In the House, Rep. Randy Hultgren (R-IL) proposed the Parental Rights Amendment with its current wording on November 16, 2017. It was numbered H.J.Res.121. It was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice. It had 20 cosponsors as of July 19, 2018. [15]

116th Congress (2019–2020)

The Parental Rights Amendment was again proposed by Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN) with its current wording on January 1, 2019. It was numbered H.J.Res.36 It was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties on January 30, 2019. It had 19 cosponsors as of December 3, 2019. [16]

118th Congress (2023–2024)

The amendment was re-introduced in the House as H.J.Res.38. [17] It was sponsored by Rep. Debbie Lesko, a Republican from Arizona, and cosponsored by seven other Republicans. [18]

State legislatures (2010 to present)

In 2010 the legislatures of Louisiana [19] and South Dakota [20] adopted resolutions calling on the U.S. Congress to propose the Parental Rights Amendment to the States for ratification. In 2011, the legislatures in Idaho, [21] Montana, [22] and Florida [23] passed similar resolutions. In 2012, Wyoming passed a similar resolution. [24] In 2019, Oklahoma became the seventh state to pass a resolution calling on Congress to pass the Parental Rights Amendment to the states for ratification. [25]

Support

Support for the amendment is found at organizations such as the American Family Association, Concerned Women for America, Focus on the Family, Liberty Counsel, and the Traditional Values Coalition. [26] Proponents of the amendment at ParentalRights.org contend that it will preserve the rights of children, arguing that the question is not one of the child rights versus parents' rights, but whether parents or the government can best decide what is in a child's best interest. [27] They contend that Section Three of their proposal will preserve the authority of the State to intercede for children who are abused or neglected, just as it exists today. [28] Proponents of the amendment at FamilyPreservationFoundation.org (FPF) contend that Parental Rights and Children's Rights are intertwined. FPF founder Dwight Mitchell states, "Parents have the duty to protect their children's rights until they are old enough to make their own way in the world. Children have the right to be safe, to be treated with affection, to be educated, to have medical care and to be protected against cruelty and abuse which loving parents provide." Section three provides "Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served." [29] They also contend children need to be raised by loving nurturing parents, not the government and advocate for state and federal policy legislation which respects parental rights, children rights and the universal rights of the extended families like Grandparents, Aunts and Uncles. [30]

On September 22, 2020, Family Preservation Foundation created a petition on the "We the People" website at petitions.whitehouse.gov to gather signatures to urge Congress to act on H.J.Res.36 which was before congress during the current session. [31]

Rep. Hoekstra has cited Antonin Scalia's dissenting opinion in Troxel v. Granville , where he argued that the Constitution did not confer upon judges the power to recognize parental rights not explicitly enumerated, as a motivation for the Amendment. [32] The plurality in Troxel v. Granville stated that parental rights to direct the upbringing of their children is a fundamental right, with Justice Thomas saying any infringement of that right should be examined under strict scrutiny. [33]

Convention on the Rights of the Child

Proponents of the amendment [34] [35] often cite concern over possible U.S. ratification of the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article Six, Section Two of the Constitution incorporates treaties ratified by the Senate into U.S. law, requiring state and federal judges to uphold treaty obligations. Constitutional lawyer Michael Farris, author and chief proponent of the Amendment, [36] expresses concern that ratifying the convention would disrupt state-level family law and shift power from the State to the federal government, leading to interference in the parent-child relationship. [37] [38] [39]

Farris and allied organizations also cite the theory of customary international law as a threat, claiming that elements of the Convention might become binding on the United States even without ratification. [40]

Opposition

Tom Head of About.com contends that the proposal contains "numerous 'poison pills' that would prevent it from being supported by mainstream civil libertarians," saying that its language is overbroad and would enable abuse and neglect by parents. He describes the amendment as unserious, meant more as a "rallying point" for "ultra-conservative legislators" than as a genuine amendment to the Constitution. [41]

Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD) says that the amendment was crafted in response to the U.N.'s Convention on the Rights of the Child, but that the Convention is not a real threat to parental rights; therefore, an amendment is not necessary. [42] [ full citation needed ] Mary Landrieu (D-LA) points out that the Convention has not been ratified, and asserts that even if it is ratified, it will not infringe upon existing laws. [43] [ full citation needed ]

On September 9, 2017, former Rep. Rick Jore stated, "My opposition to such an amendment certainly is not that I do not believe parental rights to be of utmost importance, or that I do not think they are under attack,” Jore said. “They certainly are. Too often, though, in our strategy to challenge illegitimate government action, we unwittingly accept the assumed authority behind the usurpation that is the cause of the action. It seems to me that we have gone from ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident’ to ‘There is no absolute truth,’ let alone ‘self-evident truth."" [44]

On April 25, 2019, First Focus Campaign for Children (FFCC) express opposition to the amendment stating amongst other things, that it "would create greater threats to the safety, health, and well-being of children because the “parental rights” language preempts any protections for children absent a government interest of the “highest order” or “a parental action or decision that would end life." and "undermines the fundamental rights, protections, and voice of children and would do harm." [45]

Opposition from homeschooling advocates

Larry Kaseman of Home Education magazine argues that the Amendment's focus on rights rather than responsibilities will empower parents to treat their children as property and shelter unfit parents from punishment for neglect and abuse. Kaseman also holds that parental rights exist separately from federal law, and expresses concern that a constitutional amendment would federalize family law, granting the government the power to give, define, limit, regulate, and take away parental rights. He argues that the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution already protects parental rights. [46]

Deborah Stevenson of National Home Education Legal Defense (NHELD) argues, citing the Tenth Amendment, that parental rights fall within state jurisdiction and that the issue should be resolved at the state level. [47]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Rights Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would, if added, explicitly prohibit sex discrimination. It was written by Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman and introduced in Congress in December 1923 as a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose of the ERA is to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. Proponents assert it would end legal distinctions between men and women in matters of divorce, property, employment, and other matters. Opponents originally argued it would remove protections that women needed. In the 21st century, opponents argue it is no longer needed and some disapprove of its potential effects on abortion and transgender rights.

The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA), also referred to by proponents as the Marriage Protection Amendment, was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would legally define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. The FMA would also prevent judicial extension of marriage rights to same-sex couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002</span> Joint resolution of the US Congress

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, informally known as the Iraq Resolution, is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No. 107-243, authorizing the use of the United States Armed Forces against Saddam Hussein's Iraq government in what would be known as Operation Iraqi Freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blaine Act</span> 1933 U.S. Congress joint resolution to repeal the 18th Amendment and end Prohibition

The Blaine Act, formally titled Joint Resolution Proposing the Twenty-First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is a joint resolution adopted by the United States Congress on February 20, 1933, initiating repeal of the 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which established Prohibition in the United States. Repeal was finalized when the 21st Amendment to the Constitution was ratified by the required minimum number of states on December 5, 1933.

The Flag Desecration Amendment is a proposed addition to the Constitution of the United States that would allow the U.S. Congress to prohibit by statute and provide punishment for the physical "desecration" of the flag of the United States. The concept of flag desecration continues to provoke a heated debate over protecting a national symbol, preserving free speech, and upholding the liberty said to be represented by that national symbol. While the proposal passed by the two-thirds majority required in the House of Representatives several times, in each instance it failed to attain the same required super-majority in the Senate, or was never voted upon in the Senate at all.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child Labor Amendment</span> Proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendment allowing Congress to regulate child labor

The Child Labor Amendment is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution that would specifically authorize Congress to regulate "labor of persons under eighteen years of age". The amendment was proposed on June 2, 1924, following Supreme Court rulings in 1918 and 1922 that federal laws regulating and taxing goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 and 16 were unconstitutional.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs</span> Standing committee of the United States Senate

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs is a committee of the United States Senate charged with oversight in matters related to the American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native peoples. A Committee on Indian Affairs existed from 1820 to 1947, after which it was folded into the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. A new Native Affairs Committee was created in 1977, initially as a select committee, as a result of the detachment of indigenous affairs from the new Committee on Energy and National Resources, which had succeeded the old Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. The committee was initially intended to be temporary, but was made permanent in 1984. The committee tends to include senators from Western and Plains states, who have more Native American constituents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">José E. Serrano</span> American politician (born 1943)

José Enrique Serrano is an American politician who was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1990 until his retirement in 2021. Serrano, a Democrat from New York, represented a district that is one of the smallest in the country geographically, consisting of a few square miles of the heavily populated South Bronx in New York City. His district was also one of the most densely populated and one of the few majority Hispanic districts in the country. The district was numbered the 18th from 1990 to 1993 and the 16th from 1993 to 2013, and the 15th district from 2013 to 2021. He was the longest-serving Hispanic-American in the House. He did not run for re-election in 2020 due to a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, and Ritchie Torres was elected to succeed him.

In the United States, the Victims' Rights Amendment is a provision which has been included in some states' constitutions, proposed for other states, and additionally has been proposed for inclusion in the United States Constitution. Its provisions vary from state to state but are usually somewhat similar. There are likewise competing versions of the proposed federal amendment.

The Human Life Amendment is the name of multiple proposals to amend the United States Constitution that would have the effect of overturning the Supreme Court 1973 decision Roe v. Wade, which ruled that prohibitions against abortion were unconstitutional. All of these amendment proposals seek to overturn Roe v. Wade, but most of them go further by forbidding both Congress and the states from legalizing abortion. Some of the proposals define human life as beginning with conception or fertilization.

Bills have been introduced in the US Congress on several occasions to amend the US Constitution to abolish or to reduce the power of the Electoral College and to provide for the direct popular election of the US president and vice president.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Broun</span> American physician & politician (born 1946)

Paul Collins Broun Jr. is an American physician and politician who served as the U.S. representative for Georgia's 10th congressional district from 2007 to 2015. He is a member of the Republican Party and was a member of the Tea Party Caucus.

The parents' rights movement is a civil rights movement primarily interested in human rights affecting parents related to family law, including child custody. Parents' rights are connected to parental responsibility and Right to family life.

The School Prayer Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution intended by its proponents to protect the right of the students if they wish, to voluntarily pray in schools, although opponents argue it allows for government-sponsored prayer.

The Pornography Victims Compensation Act of 1991 was a bill, S. 983, in the U.S. Congress. The sponsor in the Senate was Senator Mitch McConnell with eight cosponsors. A Senate committee held hearings on the bill. The bill was not voted on, did not pass, and did not become law.

A campaign finance reform amendment refers to any proposed amendment to the United States Constitution to authorize greater restrictions on spending related to political speech, and to overturn Supreme Court rulings which have narrowed such laws under the First Amendment. Several amendments have been filed since Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and the Occupy movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">48th Wisconsin Legislature</span> Wisconsin legislative term for 1907–1908

The Forty-Eighth Wisconsin Legislature convened from January 9, 1907, to July 16, 1907, in regular session. During this term, legislative business was largely held in the north wing of the Wisconsin State Capitol, which was the only part of the capitol to remain intact after the 1904 fire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">54th Wisconsin Legislature</span> Wisconsin legislative term for 1919–1920

The Fifty-Fourth Wisconsin Legislature convened from January 8, 1919, to July 30, 1919, in regular session, and re-convened in two special sessions in September 1919 and May 1920.

References

  1. ↑ Coller, Andie (April 8, 2009). "Parental Rights: The New Wedge Issue". CBS News. Archived from the original on 21 November 2010.
  2. ↑ "H.J.Res.97 - 110th Congress (2007-2008): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 28 July 2008.
  3. ↑ "H.J.Res.42 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 27 April 2009.
  4. ↑ "S.J.Res.13 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to parental rights". 3 March 2009.
  5. ↑ "S.J.Res.16 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to parental rights". 14 May 2009.
  6. ↑ "H.J.Res.3 - 112th Congress (2011-2012): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 24 January 2011.
  7. ↑ "H.J.Res.107 - 112th Congress (2011-2012): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 9 April 2012.
  8. ↑ "H.J.Res.110 - 112th Congress (2011-2012): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 18 July 2012.
  9. ↑ "S.J.Res.42 - 112th Congress (2011-2012): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to parental rights". 5 June 2012.
  10. ↑ "H.J.Res.50 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 15 July 2013.
  11. ↑ "S.J.Res.37 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 4 June 2014.
  12. ↑ "H.J.Res.91 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 17 May 2016.
  13. ↑ "S.J.Res.36 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". 29 June 2016.
  14. ↑ "S.J.Res.48 - A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". www.congress.gov. August 2017.
  15. ↑ "H.J.Res.121 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". www.congress.gov. 13 December 2017.
  16. ↑ "H.J.Res.36 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". www.congress.gov. 30 January 2019.
  17. ↑ "H.J.Res.38 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights". Congress.gov. Library of Congress. Retrieved 9 March 2023.
  18. ↑ "Debbie Lesko". Congress.gov. Library of Congress.
  19. ↑ "Louisiana State Legislature" . Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  20. ↑ "South Dakota Legislature" . Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  21. ↑ "USA Today, Feb. 3, 2011". February 3, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  22. ↑ "Montana State Legislature". Archived from the original on October 7, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  23. ↑ "Florida State Legislature" . Retrieved May 26, 2011.
  24. ↑ "Wyoming HJ0003 | 2012 | Budget Session".
  25. ↑ "Oklahoma State Legislature Bill Information". www.oklegislature.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  26. ↑ "Drive for Parental Rights Amendment Picks Up Over 110 Co-Signers, Christian News". Christianpost.com. 2009-07-29. Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  27. ↑ "ParentalRights.org" Accessed September 2010.
  28. ↑ "Parentsrights.us" Accessed October, 2010.
  29. ↑ "Family Preservation Foundation" . Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  30. ↑ "Family Preservation Foundation About" . Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  31. ↑ "White House Petition". We the People. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  32. ↑ "Parents' Rights". Archived from the original on 2010-12-05. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
  33. ↑ Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 80
  34. ↑ ParentalRights.Org Allied Organizations .
  35. ↑ "FamilyPreservationFoundation.org". Allied Organization.
  36. ↑ "Parental Rights: The New Wedge Issue". CBS News. April 8, 2009.
  37. ↑ David Crary, Associated Press (2009-04-30). "Kids'-rights pact finds critics in Congress". Sfgate.com. Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  38. ↑ ParentsRights.us. FAQs.
  39. ↑ Kunzman, Robert (2009). Write these laws on your children : inside the world of conservative Christian homeschooling. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press. p. 229. ISBN   978-0-8070-3291-6 . Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  40. ↑ ParentalRights.org. "The Threat of Customary International Law." Accessed October 2009.
  41. ↑ "Parental Rights Amendment – Does the Parental Rights Amendment Make Sense?". Civilliberty.about.com. 2010-06-11. Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  42. ↑ Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD) wrote to a constituent on July 22, 2009, "Frankly the (amendment) seems unnecessary, as the Convention does not threaten these rights."
  43. ↑ Sen. Mary Landrieu wrote to a constituent on March 12, 2009, "The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child does not infringe upon any laws in the United States."
  44. ↑ "Parental Rights Amendment Proposal Introduced in Senate". The Heartland Institute. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  45. ↑ "Letter: Proposed "Parental Rights" Constitutional Amendment Undermines Protections for Children | Campaign For Children". 29 April 2019. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  46. ↑ Kaseman, Larry and Susan. "Taking Charge.", July, 2009.
  47. ↑ Stevenson, Deborah. "The Parental Rights Amendment.", April 2009.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.