Worldwide influence of the Constitution of the United States

Last updated

The United States Constitution has had influence internationally on later constitutions and legal thinking. Its influence appears in similarities of phrasing and borrowed passages in other constitutions, as well as in the principles of the rule of law, separation of powers and recognition of individual rights. The American experience of constitutional amendment and judicial review motivated constitutionalists at times when they were considering the possibilities for their nation's future. Examples include Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War, his contemporary and ally Benito Juárez of Mexico, the second generation of 19th-century constitutional nationalists José Rizal of the Philippines, and Sun Yat-sen of China, and the framers of the Australian constitution. However, democratizing countries often chose more centralized British or French models of government, particularly the British Westminster system. Since the 1980's, the influence of the United States Constitution has been waning as other countries have created new constitutions or updated older constitutions, a process which Sanford Levinson believes to be more difficult in the United States than in any other country. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

National constitutions

The historian William H. McNeill argued that the United States saw itself as "one of a family of peoples and nations" making a history apart from the European civilization of their colonization. [4] The United States Constitution is an expression of Americans diverging from colonial rule, according to this viewpoint. Its effect is reflected in the ideals of limiting the rulers of a state apart and above sitting law-givers in a parliament. The concepts of governance influencing others internationally are not only found among similarities in phrasing and entire passages from the U.S. Constitution. They are in the principles of the rule of law and recognition of individual rights.

The American experience of fundamental law with amendments and judicial review has motivated foreign constitutionalists to reconsider possibilities for their own future. [4] This view informed Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War, [lower-alpha 1] his contemporary and ally Benito Juarez of Mexico, [lower-alpha 2] and the second generation of 19th century constitutional nationalists, José Rizal of the Philippines [lower-alpha 3] and Sun Yat-sen of China. [lower-alpha 4]

Generally the influence of the Constitution appears in trans-national history of ideas, foreign translations, and exchanges between Americans and their counterparts from the beginning with smuggled translations into Hispanic America until today with conferences among national legislators. Innovations include constitutional conventions, written constitutions, ratification and amendment procedures. There are common provisions for presidential executives, federalism and judicial review. [4]

American historian George Athan Billias wrote "the influence of American constitutionalism abroad was profound in the past and remains a remarkable contribution to humankind's search for freedom under a system of laws." [4] Billias describes six waves of influence:

  1. From 1776 to 1811, after the American Revolution began, it influenced northwestern Europe and its colonial connections.
  2. 1811–1848, after the decline of Napoleon's reputation, it was referenced by Latin American, Caribbean, and European nationalists.
  3. 1898–1918, after the Spanish–American War, nationalist movements borrowed from the U.S. Constitution in Asia and Latin America.
  4. 1918–1945, after World War I, its influence spread with movements for decolonization of Africa, Mid-east and Asia.
  5. 1945–1974, after World War II, independence movements consulted it.
  6. 1974–1989, after United Nations expansion, once nondemocratic regimes, including European ones, transitioned towards constitutional democracies incorporating elements of the U.S. Constitution. [4]

Over its history, the influence of American constitutionalism has waxed and waned. Internationally it appears that those of Confucian and Islamic cultures do not readily adopt some of its premises.

Democratizing countries often chose the more centralized, consolidated British or French models. [10] [11] [12] Many countries that were once part of the British Empire adopted the British Westminster system (see, for example, Representation of the People Act). [13] [14]

Australian constitutional law was influenced by the US Constitution as well as the Canadian and Swiss constitutions, while at the same time preserving Westminster parliamentary traditions and the British monarchy (see Westminster system § "Washminster system"). It adopted a federal system similar to the US, with a senate that represented the states (direct election to both Houses was a new concept). It also adopted the concepts of a formal separation of power and judicial review but did not adopt guarantees of personal rights into the constitution. [15] [16]

According to a 2012 study by David Law of Washington University in St. Louis published in the New York University Law Review , the influence of the U.S. Constitution may be waning. The study examined more than 700 federal constitutions from nearly 200 countries. "Rather than leading the way for global constitutionalism, the U.S. Constitution appears instead to be losing its appeal as a model for constitutional drafters elsewhere," the researchers write. "The idea of adopting a constitution may still trace its inspiration to the United States, but the manner in which constitutions are written increasingly does not." [17] [18] In particular, the study found that the U.S. Constitution guarantees relatively few rights compared to the constitutions of other countries and contains less than half (26 of 60) of the provisions listed in the average bill of rights. It is also one of the few in the world today that still features the right to keep and bear arms; the only others are the constitutions of Guatemala and Mexico. Overall, the research suggests that the Constitution of Canada, revised in 1982, is now a leading international model rather than that of the United States. [17] [18]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg viewed the United States Constitution as more of a relic of the 18th century rather than as a model for new constitutions. She suggested in 2012 that a nation seeking a new constitution might find a better model by examining the Constitution of South Africa (1997), the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) and the European Convention on Human Rights (1950): [19]

I would not look to the United States Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.

—  Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 2012 [19]

Translations

The Federal Judicial Center links to translations of the U.S. Constitution in nine languages. [20] The site offers other materials in eighteen languages besides English, such as Dari, Indonesian, Malay, Serb, and Turkish. [21] The center's statutory mission [22] includes working with judges and court officials of the U.S. and other nations to improve the administration of justice. [23]

The Constitution Finder of the University of Richmond has links to translations into ten different languages. [24] The Historical Society of Pennsylvania lists a translation into Armenian. [25]

Professor James Chen has annotated the Spanish translation prepared by the U.S. State Department. His notes focus on the problems and nuances of this translation. [26] Elizabeth Claire has rewritten the Constitution into simplified English. Some of the many translations of the Constitution are listed below.

The Bill of Rights

The U.S. State Department lists translations of the Bill of Rights into fifty-one languages: [50]

Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azeri, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Burmese, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Dutch, French, Georgian, German, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Kazakh, Khmer, Korean, Kurdish, Malay, Nepali, Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese-Brazilian, Portuguese-Continental, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Somali, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish, Tagalog, Thai, Turkish, Uighur, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Yoruba

A second site [51] links to the following translations: Arabic, Armenian, Chinese (simplified), French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Spanish. The Bill of Rights has been translated into Hawaiian. [52]

Commemorative stamps

In 1937 the U.S. Post Office released a commemorative stamp to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution. The engraving shown on this issue is after an 1856 painting by Junius Brutus Stearns of Washington and shows delegates signing the Constitution at the 1787 Convention. George Washington is on dais with an open document in hand; James Madison sits at the table, taking his famous notes on the convention.

One commemorative of the 19th Amendment (permitting women the right to vote) was celebrated in a commemorative in 1950 and again in 1970. The woman is voting in a curtained mechanical voting booth. She chooses levers to punch or mark her votes on a paper roll. The Model T has a male driver with a banner "Votes for women" on the car, women riders and marchers as though in a parade.

The Second Polish Republic issued a commemorative of the U.S. and Polish Constitutions in 1938 under the government of Prime Minister, Major General Składkowski The stamp features George Washington in military regalia, holding a 48-star American flag and a drawn sword. Thomas Paine holds a book on a rod, and Kosciuszko poses with a cross and saber. The next scene shows a line of infantry flying a Polish flag. The right panel shows the Statue of Liberty imposed in front of the New York 1930s skyline.

In 1937 the Second Spanish Republic commemorated the 150th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution, under the government of Prime Minister Juan Negrín of the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE). The Statue of Liberty is the central focus, flanked by flags of Spain and the United States. The Spanish Republic Flag of red, yellow and purple, as battle flag or civil ensign, lacks the coat of arms.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "Secession was indeed unconstitutional...military resistance to secession was not only constitutional but also morally justified. [5] "the primary purpose of the Constitution was … to create a more perfect union’... the Constitution was an exercise in nation-building. [6]
  2. ↑ Juarez regarded the United States as a model of republican democracy and consistently supported Abraham Lincoln. [7]
  3. ↑ The institutions of the two countries which have most influenced constitutional development are Spain and the United States." One of the reforms, "sine quibus non", to use the words of Rizal and Mabini, always insisted upon by the Filipinos, was Philippine representation in the Spanish Cortez, the promulgation in the Islands of the Spanish Constitution, and the complete assimilation equal to that of any in the Spanish provinces on the continent. [8]
  4. ↑ In the modern history of China, there were many revolutionaries who tried to seek the truth from the West in order to overthrow the feudal system of the Qing dynasty. Sun Yat-sen for example was much influenced by American democracy, especially the U.S. Constitution. [9]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution</span> Fundamental principles that govern a state

A constitution is the aggregate of fundamental principles or established precedents that constitute the legal basis of a polity, organization or other type of entity, and commonly determines how that entity is to be governed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the United States</span> Supreme law of the United States

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States. It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, on March 4, 1789. Originally including seven articles, the Constitution delineates the national frame and constrains the powers of the federal government. The Constitution's first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, in which the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress ; the executive, consisting of the president and subordinate officers ; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Article IV, Article V, and Article VI embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. Article VII establishes the procedure subsequently used by the 13 states to ratify it. The Constitution of the United States is the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution in force in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of Rights 1689</span> English civil rights legislation

The Bill of Rights 1689 is an Act of the Parliament of England that set out certain basic civil rights and clarified who would be next to inherit the Crown. It remains a crucial statute in English constitutional law.

Judicial independence is the concept that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests. Judicial independence is important for the idea of separation of powers.

The Lochner era was a period in American legal history from 1897 to 1937 in which the Supreme Court of the United States is said to have made it a common practice "to strike down economic regulations adopted by a State based on the Court's own notions of the most appropriate means for the State to implement its considered policies". The court did this by using its interpretation of substantive due process to strike down laws held to be infringing on economic liberty or private contract rights. The era takes its name from a 1905 case, Lochner v. New York. The beginning of the era is usually marked earlier, with the Court's decision in Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897), and its end marked forty years later in the case of West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937), which overturned an earlier Lochner-era decision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Living Constitution</span> U.S. Constitutional interpretation

The Living Constitution, or judicial pragmatism, is the viewpoint that the U.S. constitution holds a dynamic meaning even if the document is not formally amended. The Constitution is said to develop alongside society's needs and provide a more malleable tool for governments. The idea is associated with views that contemporary society should be considered in the constitutional interpretation of phrases. The Constitution is referred to as the living law of the land as it is transformed according to necessities of the time and the situation. Some supporters of the living method of interpretation, such as professors Michael Kammen and Bruce Ackerman, refer to themselves as organists.

A constitutional right can be a prerogative or a duty, a power or a restraint of power, recognized and established by a sovereign state or union of states. Constitutional rights may be expressly stipulated in a national constitution, or they may be inferred from the language of a national constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, meaning that laws that contradict it are considered unconstitutional and invalid. Usually any constitution defines the structure, functions, powers, and limits of the national government and the individual freedoms, rights, and obligations which will be protected and enforced when needed by the national authorities. Nowadays, most countries have a written constitution comprising similar or distinct constitutional rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jack Balkin</span> American legal scholar

Jack M. Balkin is an American legal scholar. He is the Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School. Balkin is the founder and director of the Yale Information Society Project (ISP), a research center whose mission is "to study the implications of the Internet, telecommunications, and the new information technologies for law and society." He also directs the Knight Law and Media Program and the Abrams Institute for Free Expression at Yale Law School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christian Magnus Falsen</span> Norwegian politician

Christian Magnus Falsen was a Norwegian constitutional father, statesman, jurist, and historian. He was an important member of the Norwegian Constituent Assembly and was one of the writers of the Constitution of Norway.

Constitutional theory is an area of constitutional law that focuses on the underpinnings of constitutional government. It overlaps with legal theory, constitutionalism, philosophy of law and democratic theory. It is not limited by country or jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Dominican Republic</span>

The Dominican Republic has gone through 39 constitutions, more than any other country, since its independence in 1844. This statistic is a somewhat deceiving indicator of political stability, however, because of the Dominican practice of promulgating a new constitution whenever an amendment is ratified. Although technically different from each other in some particular provisions, most new constitutions contained only minor modifications of those previously in effect. Sweeping constitutional innovations were relatively rare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rule of law</span> Political situation in which every citizen is subject to the law

The rule of law is a political ideal that all citizens and institutions within a country, state, or community are accountable to the same laws, including lawmakers and leaders. It is sometimes stated simply as "no one is above the law". The term rule of law is closely related to constitutionalism as well as Rechtsstaat. It refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule. The rule of law is defined in the Encyclopædia Britannica as "the mechanism, process, institution, practice, or norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of rights</span> Proclamation of fundamental rights to citizens of a polity

A bill of rights, sometimes called a declaration of rights or a charter of rights, is a list of the most important rights to the citizens of a country. The purpose is to protect those rights against infringement from public officials and private citizens.

The rule according to a higher law is a statement which expresses that no law may be enforced by the government unless it conforms with certain universal principles of fairness, morality, and justice. Thus, the rule according to a higher law may serve as a practical legal criterion to qualify the instances of political or economical decision-making, when a government, even though acting in conformity with clearly defined and properly enacted law, still produces results which many observers find unfair or unjust.

Constitutionalism is "a compound of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Separation of powers in Singapore</span>

The Separation of powers in Singapore is governed by Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, which splits the power to govern the country between three branches of government – the parliament, which makes laws; the executive, which executes them; and the judiciary, which enforces them. Each branch, while wielding legitimate power and being protected from external influences, is subject to a system of checks and balances by the other branches to prevent abuse of power. This Westminster constitutional model was inherited from the British during Singapore's colonial years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zhang Qianfan</span>

Zhang Qianfan is a constitutional law professor at Peking University Law School, and an activist who advocates constitutionalism in China and has called for China's general political and judicial reform.

Judicial populism or juridical populism is a phenomenon where the judgments and actions of the courts are driven by the perception of the masses or certain groups. The term, which some refer to as popular constitutionalism, has been described as a reaction to the perceived elitist bias in the legal system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common good constitutionalism</span> Conservative legal philosophy created by Adrian Vermeule

Common good constitutionalism is a legal theory formulated by Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule that asserts that "the central aim of the constitutional order is to promote good rule, not to 'protect liberty' as an end in itself". Vermeule describes it as an attempt to revive and develop the classical legal tradition by understanding enacted law as a positive application of background natural law principles. Within this tradition, he claims law is defined as "an ordinance of reason promulgated by political authorities for the common good." Vermeule states that law in this sense is "not tethered to particular written instruments of civil law or the will of the legislators who created them" but instead embody rational determinations of the common good, and it is those determinations, as well as the natural law background against which they are made, which constitute the law. Vermeule says that these principles include "a candid willingness to "legislate morality."

References

  1. ↑ Liptak, Adam (2012-02-15). "'We the People' Loses Appeal With People Around the World - NYTimes.com". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2012-02-15. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
  2. ↑ Weigel, Margaret (April 9, 2013). "The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution". Journalist's Resource. Harvard Kennedy School of Government Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy . Retrieved April 23, 2015.
  3. ↑ Law, David S.; Versteeg, Mila (2012). "The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution". New York University Law Review . 87 (3): 762–858. SSRN   1923556.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Billias 2009, xi–xv.
  5. ↑ Farber 2003, p. 3.
  6. ↑ Farber 2003, p. 198.
  7. ↑ Stacy 2003, p. 436.
  8. ↑ Malcolm 1920, p. 109.
  9. ↑ Qing Yu 1988, p. 193.
  10. ↑ Julian Go (2007). "A Globalizing Constitutionalism?, Views from the Postcolony, 1945–2000". In Arjomand, Saïd Amir (ed.). Constitutionalism and political reconstruction. Brill. pp. 92–94. ISBN   978-9004151741.
  11. ↑ Johnston, Douglas M.; Reisman, W. Michael (2008). The Historical Foundations of World Order. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 571. ISBN   978-9047423935.
  12. ↑ Fieldhouse, David; Madden, Frederick (1990). Settler Self-Government, 1840–1900: The Development of Representative and Responsible Government (1. publ. ed.). New York: Greenwood Press. p. xxi. ISBN   978-0-313-27326-1.
  13. ↑ Seidle, F. Leslie; Docherty, David C. (2003). Reforming parliamentary democracy. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 3. ISBN   9780773525085.
  14. ↑ "How the Westminster Parliamentary System was exported around the World". University of Cambridge. December 2, 2013. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  15. ↑ Williams, George; Brennan, Sean; Lynch, Andrew (2014). Blackshield and Williams Australian Constitutional Law and Theory (6 ed.). Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press. pp. 77–88. ISBN   978-1-86287-918-8.
  16. ↑ Aroney, Nicholas; Kincaid, John. "Analysis | Comparing Australian and American federal jurisprudence". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2020-11-04.
  17. 1 2 "The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution". Journalist's Resource. Harvard Kennedy School of Government Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy. April 9, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2012.
  18. 1 2 Law, David S.; Versteeg, Mila (2012). "The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution". New York University Law Review . 87 (3): 762–858. SSRN   1923556.
  19. 1 2 Staff reporters and Steven Sweeney, March 4, 2012, Massachusetts Daily Collegian, A Second Constitutional Convention, Accessed April 7, 2014, "...As Justice Ginsburg's comments suggest, the U.S. Constitution is more a relic of the 18th century than a workable plan for government in the 21st. A recent study conducted by David Law ... concluded that our Constitution's global appeal has diminished markedly. ... "
  20. ↑ "International Judicial Relations | FJC Online". Archived from the original on 2016-01-06. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
  21. 1 2 "International Judicial Relations — Translated Material". Fjc.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-08-07. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
  22. ↑ [United States Code, Title 28, sections 620-629]
  23. ↑ The Federal Judicial Center Archived 2011-08-07 at the Wayback Machine , viewed 07/27/2011.
  24. ↑ Constitution Finder, viewed 09/16/2015.
  25. ↑ Search Results – united states constitution
  26. ↑ Chen, Jim (2013). "La Constitucion De Los Estados Unidos En Espanol: Un Servicio Para El Pueblo Americano". Constitutional Commentary. 28. SSRN   925271 – via SSRN.
  27. ↑ "Arabic Constitution" (PDF) (in Arabic). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-29. Retrieved 2023-09-23.
  28. ↑ "The Constitution of the United States" [美利坚合众国宪法](PDF) (in Chinese). 1789. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 5, 2011. Retrieved September 26, 2014.
  29. ↑ "Constitution of the United States of America" [美利堅合眾國憲法]. Judicial Yuan (in Chinese). April 30, 1789. Archived from the original on October 1, 2014. Retrieved September 26, 2014.
  30. ↑ A.U.C, Active USA Center. "Grondwet Verenigde Staten van Amerika (NL) | Bestuur en samenleving".
  31. ↑ "French Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  32. ↑ "French Constitution" (PDF). www.constitutionfacts.com. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  33. ↑ "Verfassung" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-03-17.
  34. ↑ "German Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  35. ↑ "U.S. Constitution". Israel.usembassy.gov. Archived from the original on 2014-08-26. Retrieved 2014-11-06.
  36. ↑ "Hungarian translation of the U.S. Constitution". Hungarian.hungary.usembassy.gov. Archived from the original on 2016-06-18. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
  37. ↑ "Italian Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  38. ↑ "Japanese translation of the U.S. Constitution". Aboutusa.japan.usembassy.gov. 2009-03-13. Archived from the original on 2009-04-14. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
  39. ↑ "Japan Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  40. ↑ "Korea Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  41. ↑ "Portugal Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  42. ↑ "Russia Constitution" (PDF). constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  43. ↑ "U.S. Constitution (Slovak)".
  44. ↑ "The Constitution of the United States: En Espanol - National Constitution Center". National Constitution Center – constitutioncenter.org.
  45. ↑ "Spanish translation of the U.S. Constitution". Cato.org. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
  46. ↑ "United States of America: Constitución de 1787 en español". Pdba.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
  47. ↑ "Constitución de los Estados Unidos de América — The U.S. Constitution Online". USConstitution.net. 2010-01-24. Retrieved 2010-03-17.
  48. ↑ Kyiv.usembassy.gov [ dead link ]
  49. ↑ "Vietnam Constitution" (PDF). photos.state.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  50. ↑ "GPA Publications -". GPA Publications. 2012-01-20. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
  51. ↑ "Bill of Rights in 15 Different Languages!". Archived from the original on 2017-03-17. Retrieved 2015-10-29.
  52. ↑ "Hawaiian Bill of Rights" (PDF). jpfo.org. Retrieved 2020-11-07.

Works cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.