Child Labor Amendment

Last updated

The Child Labor Amendment (CLA) is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution that would specifically authorize Congress to regulate "labor of persons under eighteen years of age". The amendment was proposed on June 2, 1924, [1] following Supreme Court rulings in 1918 and 1922 that federal laws regulating and taxing goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 and 16 were unconstitutional.

Contents

The majority of the state legislatures ratified the amendment by the mid-1930s; however, it has not been ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states according to Article V of the Constitution and none has ratified it since 1937. Interest in the amendment waned following the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which implemented federal regulation of child labor with the Supreme Court's approval in 1941.

The amendment was itself the subject of a 1939 Supreme Court decision, Coleman v. Miller (307 U.S. 433), regarding its putative expiration. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the amendment is still pending before the states. Ratification by an additional 10 states would be necessary for this amendment to come into force. In recent years, lawmakers in a handful of states have introduced resolutions to ratify the amendment.

Text

Section 1. The Congress shall have the power to limit, regulate, and prohibit the labor of persons under eighteen years of age.

Section 2. The power of the several States is unimpaired by this article except that the operation of State laws shall be suspended to the extent necessary to give effect to legislation enacted by the Congress. [2]

Background

With the Keating–Owen Act of 1916, the United States Congress had attempted to regulate interstate commerce involving goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 or 16, depending on the type of work. The Supreme Court found this law unconstitutional in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918). Later that year, Congress attempted to levy a tax on businesses with employees under the ages of 14 or 16 (again depending on the type of work), which was struck down by the Supreme Court in Bailey v. Drexel Furniture (1922). It became apparent that a constitutional amendment would be necessary for such legislation to overcome the Court's objections. [3]

Legislative history

The amendment was offered by Ohio Republican Congressman Israel Moore Foster on April 26, 1924, during the 68th Congress, in the form of House Joint Resolution No. 184.

House Joint Resolution No. 184 was adopted by the United States House of Representatives on April 26, 1924, with a vote of 297 yeas, 69 nays, 2 absent and 64 not voting. [4] It was then adopted by the United States Senate on June 2, 1924, with a vote of 61 yeas, 23 nays and 12 not voting. [1] And with that, the proposed constitutional amendment was submitted to the state legislatures for ratification pursuant to Article V of the Constitution.

Ratification history

Ratification status of the Child Labor Amendment .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Ratified the amendment Rejected the amendment Child Labor Amendment ratification.svg
Ratification status of the Child Labor Amendment
  Ratified the amendment
  Rejected the amendment
The Child Labor Amendment as passed by Congress Child Labor Amendment.jpg
The Child Labor Amendment as passed by Congress

Having been approved by Congress, the proposed amendment was sent to the state legislatures for ratification and was ratified by the following 28 states: [5]

  1. Arkansas – June 28, 1924
  2. California – January 8, 1925
  3. Arizona – January 29, 1925
  4. Wisconsin – February 25, 1925
  5. Montana – February 11, 1927
  6. Colorado – April 28, 1931
  7. Oregon – January 31, 1933
  8. Washington – February 3, 1933
  9. North Dakota – March 4, 1933 (After State Senate rejection – January 28, 1925)
  10. Ohio – March 22, 1933
  11. Michigan – May 10, 1933
  12. New Hampshire – May 17, 1933 (After rejection – March 18, 1925)
  13. New Jersey – June 12, 1933
  14. Illinois – June 30, 1933
  15. Oklahoma – July 5, 1933
  16. Iowa – December 5, 1933 (After State House rejection – March 11, 1925)
  17. West Virginia – December 12, 1933
  18. Minnesota – December 14, 1933 (After rejection – April 14, 1925)
  19. Maine – December 16, 1933 (After rejection – April 10, 1925)
  20. Pennsylvania – December 21, 1933 (After rejection – April 16, 1925)
  21. Wyoming – January 31, 1935
  22. Utah – February 5, 1935 (After rejection – February 4, 1925)
  23. Idaho – February 7, 1935 (After State House rejection – February 7, 1925)
  24. Indiana – February 8, 1935 (After State Senate rejection – February 5, 1925 and State House rejection – March 5, 1925)
  25. Kentucky – January 13, 1937 (After rejection – March 24, 1926)
  26. Nevada – January 29, 1937
  27. New Mexico – February 12, 1937 (After rejection – 1935)
  28. Kansas – February 25, 1937 (After rejection – January 30, 1925)

During the 1920s and 1930s, the following fifteen state legislatures rejected the Child Labor Amendment and did not subsequently ratify it:

  1. Connecticut – February 11, 1925 (State Senate Rejection — February 5, 1925 and State House rejection – February 11, 1925) [6] [7]
  2. Delaware – 1925 (State Senate and State House Rejection — January 28 1925) [8] [9]
  3. Florida – 1925 (State Senate Rejection — April 15, 1925 and State House Rejection April 29, 1925) [10] [11]
  4. Georgia – August 6, 1924 [12]
  5. Louisiana – 1924, 1934 and 1936
  6. Maryland – March 18, 1927 [13]
  7. Massachusetts – Rejected by Voters in a referendum on November 4, 1924 [14]
  8. Missouri – 1925 (State Senate Rejection — March 20, 1925 and State House Rejection — March 3, 1925) [15] [16]
  9. North Carolina – August 23, 1924 [17]
  10. South Carolina – 1925 (State Senate Rejection — January 27, 1925 and State House Rejection — January 21, 1925) [18] [19]
  11. South Dakota – 1925, 1933 and 1937
  12. Tennessee – 1925
  13. Texas – 1925 (State Senate Rejection — January 26, 1925 and State House Rejection — January 27, 1925) [20] [21]
  14. Vermont – 1925
  15. Virginia – 1926 [5]

Although the act, on the part of state legislatures, of "rejecting" a proposed constitutional amendment has no legal recognition, such action does have political ramifications.

Of the 48 states in the Union during the 1920s and 1930s, two have taken no action of record on the amendment: Alabama and Rhode Island. Meanwhile in Nebraska, that state's Senate voted to ratify the CLA in 1929 (Nebraska's Legislature did not become unicameral until 1937). In Mississippi, that state's Senate voted to ratify the CLA in 1934. In New York, that state's Senate voted to ratify the CLA in 1937. And in 2024, the Connecticut House of Representatives voted to ratify the CLA. As to Alaska and Hawaii —both of which became states in 1959—the Hawaii Senate voted to ratify the CLA in 2021 and again in 2022. [5]

Renewed ratification attempts and expressions of support

In 2021 and 2022, a concurrent resolution to ratify the Child Labor Amendment passed in the Hawaii Senate with bipartisan support but stalled in the Hawaii House of Representatives. [22] [23] In 2024, a resolution to ratify the amendment passed in the Connecticut House of Representatives but was not brought up for a vote in the Connecticut Senate. [24] [25] Since 2018, ratification resolutions have also been introduced in New York, [26] Rhode Island, [27] Nebraska, [28] and Maryland, [29] as was a resolution in Minnesota reaffirming that state's ratification from 1933. [30]

In 2024, the New Hampshire House of Representatives adopted—without action of the New Hampshire Senate —a unicameral House Resolution reaffirming support for the 1933 ratification of the Child Labor Amendment by the full New Hampshire General Court which, despite its judicial sound, is the official name of New Hampshire's legislature. That unicameral House Resolution was formally received on November 14, 2024, by the United States Senate—as noted in the Congressional Record of that date—and was duly referred to the Senate's Committee on the Judiciary as reflected in the Record.

Supporters of ratification, such as University of San Diego School of Law professor Jessica Heldman and Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik, have argued that the amendment could strengthen existing federal child labor protections, especially with some states loosening their child labor laws in recent years. [31] [32] [33] Nebraska State Senator Carol Blood, who introduced a resolution to ratify the amendment, stated that it would only be "ratifying what is already in law", and making a statement that Nebraska "missed an opportunity to do better". [34] In Connecticut, a ratification resolution was supported by the state's AFL-CIO chapter and other union leaders. [35] [36] The amendment is supported by the Child Labor Coalition. [37]

Presently, there being 50 states in the Union, the amendment will remain inoperative unless it is ratified by the legislatures of an additional 10 states to reach the necessary threshold of approval by 38 state legislatures.

Judicial history

Only five states adopted the amendment in the 1920s. Ten of the states initially balked, then re-examined their position during the 1930s and decided to ratify. These delayed decisions resulted in many controversies and resulted in the 1939 Supreme Court case Coleman v. Miller (307 U.S. 433) in which it was determined that the Child Labor Amendment remained pending before the state legislatures because the 68th Congress did not specify any deadline. The ruling also formed the basis of the unusual and belated ratification of the 27th Amendment which was proposed by Congress in 1789 and ratified more than two centuries later in 1992 by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the 50 states.

The common legal opinion on federal child labor regulation reversed in the 1930s. Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938 regulating the employment of those under 16 or 18 years of age. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of that law in United States v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941), which overturned Hammer v. Dagenhart – one of the key decisions that had motivated the proponents of the Child Labor Amendment. After this shift, the amendment has been described as "moot" [38] and lost the momentum that had once propelled it; [39] hence, the movement for it has advanced no further. [40]

If ever ratified by the required number of U.S. state legislatures, the Child Labor Amendment would repose in the Congress of the United States shared jurisdiction with the states to legislate on the subject of child labor.

Opposition

In 1933, J. Gresham Machen, who was a major voice at the time for Evangelical Fundamentalism and conservative politics, delivered a paper called Mountains and Why We Love Them, which was read before a group of ministers in Philadelphia on November 27, 1933. In passing, Machen mentions the CLA and rhetorically asks "Will the so-called 'Child Labor Amendment' and other similar measures be adopted, to the destruction of all the decencies and privacies of the home?" [41]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Five of the United States Constitution</span> Description of amendment procedure

Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the procedure for altering the Constitution. Under Article Five, the process to alter the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments, and subsequent ratification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1913 amendment establishing the direct election of senators

The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state. The amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1920 amendment mandating womens suffrage

The Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the United States and its states from denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States on the basis of sex, in effect recognizing the right of women to vote. The amendment was the culmination of a decades-long movement for women's suffrage in the United States, at both the state and national levels, and was part of the worldwide movement towards women's suffrage and part of the wider women's rights movement. The first women's suffrage amendment was introduced in Congress in 1878. However, a suffrage amendment did not pass the House of Representatives until May 21, 1919, which was quickly followed by the Senate, on June 4, 1919. It was then submitted to the states for ratification, achieving the requisite 36 ratifications to secure adoption, and thereby went into effect, on August 18, 1920. The Nineteenth Amendment's adoption was certified on August 26, 1920.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1919 amendment establishing prohibition of alcohol

The Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the prohibition of alcohol in the United States. The amendment was proposed by Congress on December 18, 1917, and ratified by the requisite number of states on January 16, 1919. The Eighteenth Amendment was repealed by the Twenty-first Amendment on December 5, 1933, making it the only constitutional amendment in American history to be repealed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Rights Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would, if added, explicitly prohibit sex discrimination. It was written by Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman and first introduced in Congress in December 1923. With the rise of the women's movement in the United States during the 1960s, the ERA garnered increasing support, and, after being reintroduced by Representative Martha Griffiths in 1971, it was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives that year, and by the U.S. Senate in 1972, thus submitting the ERA to the state legislatures for ratification, as provided by Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The amendment's ratification in the states remains disputed to today, and it remains unratified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1961 amendment granting presidential electors to the District of Columbia

The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution extends the right to participate in presidential elections to the District of Columbia. The amendment grants to the district electors in the Electoral College, as though it were a state, though the district can never have more electors than the least-populous state. How the electors are appointed is to be determined by Congress. The Twenty-third Amendment was proposed by the 86th Congress on June 16, 1960; it was ratified by the requisite number of states on March 29, 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1992 amendment delaying congressional salary changes

The Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress may take effect only after the next election of the House of Representatives has occurred. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions, thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

Ratification is a principal's legal confirmation of an act of its agent. In international law, ratification is the process by which a state declares its consent to be bound to a treaty. In the case of bilateral treaties, ratification is usually accomplished by exchanging the requisite instruments, and in the case of multilateral treaties, the usual procedure is for the depositary to collect the ratifications of all states, keeping all parties informed of the situation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment</span> Proposed U.S. constitutional amendment

The District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would have given the District of Columbia full representation in the United States Congress, full representation in the Electoral College system, and full participation in the process by which the Constitution is amended. It would have also repealed the Twenty-third Amendment, which granted the District of Columbia the same number of electoral votes as that of the least populous state, but gave it no role in contingent elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corwin Amendment</span> Proposed US constitutional amendment to protect slavery from federal power

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could theoretically still be adopted by the state legislatures. It would have shielded slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress.

A convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also referred to as an Article V Convention, state convention, or amendatory convention is one of two methods authorized by Article Five of the United States Constitution whereby amendments to the United States Constitution may be proposed: on the Application of two thirds of the State legislatures the Congress shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which become law only after ratification by three-fourths of the states. The Article V convention method has never been used; but 33 amendments have been proposed by the other method, a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress; and 27 of these have been ratified by three-fourths of the States. Although there has never been a federal constitutional convention since the original one, at the state level more than 230 constitutional conventions have assembled in the United States.

State ratifying conventions are one of the two methods established by Article V of the United States Constitution for ratifying proposed constitutional amendments. The only amendment that has been ratified through this method thus far is the 21st Amendment in 1933.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Congressional Apportionment Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the US Constitution pertaining to the number of Representatives in the House

The Congressional Apportionment Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that addresses the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It was proposed by Congress on September 25, 1789, but was never ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment is still pending before the states. As of 2024, it is one of six unratified amendments.

The Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution is a proposed change to the United States Constitution. The amendment's advocates say that it will allow parents' rights to direct the upbringing of their children, protected from federal interference, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Amendment was first proposed during the 110th Congress as House Joint Resolution 97 in July 2008, but no action was taken during that Congress. The Amendment has been described as a "wedge issue" and part of the culture wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">57th Wisconsin Legislature</span> Wisconsin legislative term for 1925–1926

The Fifty-Seventh Wisconsin Legislature convened from January 14, 1925, to June 29, 1925, in regular session, and reconvened in a special session in April 1926.

References

  1. 1 2 65 Congressional Record 10142
  2. ↑ "The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Centennial Edition, Interim Edition: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 26, 2013" (PDF). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. p. 50. Retrieved July 11, 2014.
  3. ↑ "Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916". Our Documents. National Archives. Retrieved October 20, 2012.
  4. ↑ 65 Congressional Record 7294–7295
  5. 1 2 3 James J. Kilpatrick, ed. (1961). The Constitution of the United States and Amendments Thereto. Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government. pp. 68–69.
  6. ↑ Hickey, Daniel, ed. (1925). Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of Connecticut. State of Connecticut. p. 418.
  7. ↑ Baker, J. Frederick, ed. (1925). Journal of the Senate of the State of Connecticut. State of Connecticut. p. 379.
  8. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives at a session of the General Assembly. Milford Chronicle Publishing Company. 1925. p. 126.
  9. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the State of Delaware, at a session of the General Assembly. Milford Chronicle Publishing Company. 1925. p. 90.
  10. ↑ Journal of the State Senate of Florida of the Session of 1925. F. J. Appleyard. 1925. p. 172.
  11. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of Florida. Appleyard. p. 984.
  12. ↑ Acts and Resolutions of the General Assembly of Georgia. Stein Printing Co., State Printers. 1924. p. 833.
  13. ↑ "Archives of Maryland, Volume 0569, Page 1643 – Session Laws, 1927". msa.maryland.gov. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  14. ↑ "Massachusetts Federal Child Labor Law, Question 7 (1924)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  15. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the State of Missouri. 1925. p. 773.
  16. ↑ Journal of the House of the State of Missouri. 1925. p. 705.
  17. ↑ Public Laws and Resolutions Enacted by the Extra Session of the General Assembly of 1924. Mitchell Printing Company. 1924. p. 219.
  18. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives of the First Session of the 77th General Assembly of the State of South Carolina. Joint Committee on Printing. 1925. p. 94.
  19. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina. Gonzales and Bryan. 1925. p. 104.
  20. ↑ Journal of the Texas State Senate. 1925. pp. 127–8.
  21. ↑ Journal of the Texas House of Representatives. 1925. p. 206.
  22. ↑ "SCR99 SD1 HD1 (2021)". Hawaii State Legislature . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  23. ↑ "SCR8 (2022)". Hawaii State Legislature . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  24. ↑ Kamphausen, Hudson (May 1, 2024). "House Votes Yes On Federal Child Labor Amendment, Waits For Senate". CT News Junkie. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  25. ↑ "RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES PERMITTING CONGRESS TO REGULATE CHILD LABOR". Connecticut General Assembly . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  26. ↑ "New York State Assembly | Bill Search and Legislative Information". www.nyassembly.gov. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  27. ↑ "2021 - S0438" (PDF). Rhode Island Senate . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  28. ↑ "LR5 – Legislative resolution to ratify an amendment to the Constitution to the United States relating to regulation of child labor". Nebraska Legislature . Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  29. ↑ "HJ0007". Maryland General Assembly. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  30. ↑ "HF 3275". Minnesota Legislature . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  31. ↑ Heldman, Jessica K. (May 10, 2023). "There is More Work to Be Done to Eliminate Oppressive Child Labor". American Constitution Society. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  32. ↑ Hiltzik, Michael (July 24, 2023). "Column: The carnage from the rollback of child labor laws is just starting". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  33. ↑ "The Forgotten History of the Child Labor Amendment". TIME. May 13, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
  34. ↑ Wendling, Zach (March 3, 2023). "Supporters of child labor resolution say it could make Nebraska 'new champion' • Nebraska Examiner". Nebraska Examiner. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  35. ↑ Melita, Rick (March 4, 2024). "Revisiting Child Labor Laws in the New Gilded Age: A Call for Action". CT News Junkie. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  36. ↑ "Testimony For Bill Number HJ-00217 In All Committees". Connecticut General Assembly. March 25, 2024. Archived from the original on March 25, 2024. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  37. ↑ Children's Advocacy Institute. "Put Maryland on the Correct Side of History: Ratify the Child Labor Amendment of 1924" (PDF). Maryland General Assembly. Retrieved May 9, 2024.
  38. ↑ Vile, John R. (2003). Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789-2002. ABC-CLIO. p. 63. ISBN   9781851094288.
  39. ↑ Strauss, David A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press. pp. 125–126. ISBN   9780195377279.
  40. ↑ Griffin, Stephen M. (1998). American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics . Princeton University Press. p.  89. ISBN   9780691002408.
  41. ↑ Gresham Machen, J. (August 1934). "Mountains and Why We Love Them". Christianity Today.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.