Child Labor Amendment

Last updated

The Child Labor Amendment is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution that would specifically authorize Congress to regulate "labor of persons under eighteen years of age". The amendment was proposed on June 2, 1924, [1] following Supreme Court rulings in 1918 and 1922 that federal laws regulating and taxing goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 and 16 were unconstitutional.

Contents

The majority of the state legislatures ratified the amendment by the mid-1930s; however, it has not been ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states according to Article V of the Constitution and none has ratified it since 1937. Interest in the amendment waned following the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which implemented federal regulation of child labor with the Supreme Court's approval in 1941.

The amendment was itself the subject of a 1939 Supreme Court decision, Coleman v. Miller (307 U.S. 433), regarding its putative expiration. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the amendment is still pending before the states. Ratification by an additional ten states would be necessary for this amendment to come into force. In recent years, lawmakers in several states have introduced bills to ratify the amendment.

Text

Section 1. The Congress shall have the power to limit, regulate, and prohibit the labor of persons under eighteen years of age.

Section 2. The power of the several States is unimpaired by this article except that the operation of State laws shall be suspended to the extent necessary to give effect to legislation enacted by the Congress. [2]

Background

With the Keating–Owen Act of 1916, the United States Congress had attempted to regulate interstate commerce involving goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 or 16, depending on the type of work. The Supreme Court found this law unconstitutional in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918). Later that year, Congress attempted to levy a tax on businesses with employees under the ages of 14 or 16 (again depending on the type of work), which was struck down by the Supreme Court in Bailey v. Drexel Furniture (1922). It became apparent that a constitutional amendment would be necessary for such legislation to overcome the Court's objections. [3]

Legislative history

The amendment was offered by Ohio Republican Congressman Israel Moore Foster on April 26, 1924, during the 68th Congress, in the form of House Joint Resolution No. 184.

House Joint Resolution No. 184 was adopted by the United States House of Representatives on April 26, 1924, with a vote of 297 yeas, 69 nays, 2 absent and 64 not voting. [4] It was then adopted by the Senate on June 2, 1924, with a vote of 61 yeas, 23 nays and 12 not voting. [1] And with that, the proposed constitutional amendment was submitted to the state legislatures for ratification pursuant to Article V of the Constitution.

Ratification history

Ratification status of the Child Labor Amendment .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Ratified the amendment Rejected the amendment Child Labor Amendment ratification.svg
Ratification status of the Child Labor Amendment
  Ratified the amendment
  Rejected the amendment
The Child Labor Amendment as passed by Congress Child Labor Amendment.jpg
The Child Labor Amendment as passed by Congress

Having been approved by Congress, the proposed amendment was sent to the state legislatures for ratification and was ratified by the following states: [5]

  1. Arkansas – June 28, 1924
  2. California – January 8, 1925
  3. Arizona – January 29, 1925
  4. Wisconsin – February 25, 1925
  5. Montana – February 11, 1927
  6. Colorado – April 28, 1931
  7. Oregon – January 31, 1933
  8. Washington – February 3, 1933
  9. North Dakota – March 4, 1933 (After State Senate rejection – January 28, 1925)
  10. Ohio – March 22, 1933
  11. Michigan – May 10, 1933
  12. New Hampshire – May 17, 1933 (After rejection – March 18, 1925)
  13. New Jersey – June 12, 1933
  14. Illinois – June 30, 1933
  15. Oklahoma – July 5, 1933
  16. Iowa – December 5, 1933 (After State House rejection – March 11, 1925)
  17. West Virginia – December 12, 1933
  18. Minnesota – December 14, 1933 (After rejection – April 14, 1925)
  19. Maine – December 16, 1933 (After rejection – April 10, 1925)
  20. Pennsylvania – December 21, 1933 (After rejection – April 16, 1925)
  21. Wyoming – January 31, 1935
  22. Utah – February 5, 1935 (After rejection – February 4, 1925)
  23. Idaho – February 7, 1935 (After State House rejection – February 7, 1925)
  24. Indiana – February 8, 1935 (After State Senate rejection – February 5, 1925 and State House rejection - March 5, 1925)
  25. Kentucky – January 13, 1937 (After rejection – March 24, 1926)
  26. Nevada – January 29, 1937
  27. New Mexico – February 12, 1937 (After rejection – 1935)
  28. Kansas – February 25, 1937 (After rejection – January 30, 1925)

The following fifteen state legislatures rejected the Child Labor Amendment and did not subsequently ratify it:

  1. Connecticut - February 11, 1925 (State Senate Rejection — February 5, 1925 and State House rejection - February 11, 1925) [6] [7]
  2. Delaware - 1925 (State Senate and State House Rejection — January 28 1925) [8] [9]
  3. Florida - 1925 (State Senate Rejection — April 15, 1925 and State House Rejection April 29, 1925) [10] [11]
  4. Georgia - August 6, 1924 [12]
  5. Louisiana - 1924
  6. Maryland - March 18, 1927 [13]
  7. Massachusetts - Rejected by Voters in a referendum on November 4, 1924 [14]
  8. Missouri - 1925 (State Senate Rejection — March 20, 1925 and State House Rejection — March 3, 1925) [15] [16]
  9. North Carolina - August 23rd, 1924 [17]
  10. South Carolina - 1925 (State Senate Rejection — January 27, 1925 and State House Rejection — January 21, 1925) [18] [19]
  11. South Dakota - 1925, 1933 and 1937
  12. Tennessee - 1925
  13. Texas - 1925 (State Senate Rejection — January 26, 1925 and State House Rejection — January 27, 1925) [20] [21]
  14. Vermont - 1925
  15. Virginia - 1926 [5]

Although the act, on the part of state legislatures, of "rejecting" a proposed constitutional amendment has no legal recognition, such action does have political ramifications.

Of the 48 states in the Union in 1924, five have taken no action of record on the amendment: Alabama, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York and Rhode Island; neither have Alaska nor Hawaii, both of which became states in 1959. [5]

Renewed ratification attempts

On March 15, 2018, a concurrent resolution to belatedly ratify the Child Labor Amendment was introduced in the New York State Assembly, but received no further consideration after being referred to that chamber's Committee on Judiciary. [22] In 2021 and 2022, a concurrent resolution to ratify the Child Labor Amendment passed in the Hawaii Senate with bipartisan support but stalled in the Hawaii House of Representatives. [23] [24] Resolutions to ratify the amendment have also been introduced in the Rhode Island Senate (2021), [25] Nebraska Legislature (2023), [26] Connecticut General Assembly (2024) [27] and Maryland House of Delegates (2024). [28] A resolution reaffirming Minnesota's ratification from 1933 was introduced in 2024. [29]

Supporters of ratification, such as University of San Diego School of Law professor Jessica Heldman and Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik, have argued that the amendment could strengthen existing federal child labor protections, especially with some states loosening their child labor laws in recent years. [30] [31] Nebraska State Senator Carol Blood, who introduced a bill to ratify the amendment, stated that it would only be "ratifying what is already in law", and making a statement that Nebraska "missed an opportunity to do better". [32] In Connecticut, a ratification bill was supported by the state's AFL-CIO chapter and other union leaders. [33] [34]

Presently, there being 50 states in the Union, the amendment will remain inoperative unless it is ratified by an additional 10 states to reach the necessary threshold of 38 states.

Judicial history

Only five states adopted the amendment in the 1920s. Ten of the states initially balked, then re-examined their position during the 1930s and decided to ratify. These delayed decisions resulted in many controversies and resulted in the 1939 Supreme Court case Coleman v. Miller (307 U.S. 433) in which it was determined that the Child Labor Amendment remained pending before the state legislatures because the 68th Congress did not specify any deadline. The ruling also formed the basis of the unusual and belated ratification of the 27th Amendment which was proposed by Congress in 1789 and ratified more than two centuries later in 1992 by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the 50 states.

The common legal opinion on federal child labor regulation reversed in the 1930s. Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938 regulating the employment of those under 16 or 18 years of age. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of that law in United States v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941), which overturned Hammer v. Dagenhart – one of the key decisions that had motivated the proponents of the Child Labor Amendment. After this shift, the amendment has been described as "moot" [35] and lost the momentum that had once propelled it; [36] hence, the movement for it has advanced no further. [37]

If ever ratified by the required number of U.S. state legislatures, the Child Labor Amendment would repose in the Congress of the United States shared jurisdiction with the states to legislate on the subject of child labor.

Opposition

In 1933, J. Gresham Machen, who was a major voice at the time for Evangelical Fundamentalism and conservative politics, delivered a paper called Mountains and Why We Love Them, which was read before a group of ministers in Philadelphia on November 27, 1933. In passing he mentions the Child Labor Amendment and says "Will the so-called 'Child Labor Amendment' and other similar measures be adopted, to the destruction of all the decencies and privacies of the home?" [38]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the United States</span> Supreme law of the United States since 1789

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States. It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, on March 4, 1789. Originally including seven articles, the Constitution delineates the national frame and constrains the powers of the federal government. The Constitution's first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, in which the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress ; the executive, consisting of the president and subordinate officers ; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Article IV, Article V, and Article VI embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. Article VII establishes the procedure subsequently used by the 13 states to ratify it. The Constitution of the United States is the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution in force in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Five of the United States Constitution</span> Description of amendment procedure

Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the procedure for altering the Constitution. Under Article Five, the process to alter the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments, and subsequent ratification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1913 amendment establishing the direct election of senators

The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state. The amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1919 amendment establishing prohibition of alcohol

The Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the prohibition of alcohol in the United States. The amendment was proposed by Congress on December 18, 1917, and ratified by the requisite number of states on January 16, 1919. The Eighteenth Amendment was repealed by the Twenty-first Amendment on December 5, 1933—the only constitutional amendment in American history to be repealed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Rights Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would, if added, explicitly prohibit sex discrimination. It was written by Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman and introduced in Congress in December 1923 as a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose of the ERA is to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. Proponents assert it would end legal distinctions between men and women in matters of divorce, property, employment, and other matters. Opponents originally argued it would remove protections that women needed. In the 21st century, opponents argue it is no longer needed and some fear it would protect abortion and transgender rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1992 amendment delaying congressional salary changes

The Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress may take effect only after the next election of the House of Representatives has occurred. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions, thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

Ratification is a principal's legal confirmation of an act of its agent. In international law, ratification is the process by which a state declares its consent to be bound to a treaty. In the case of bilateral treaties, ratification is usually accomplished by exchanging the requisite instruments, and in the case of multilateral treaties, the usual procedure is for the depositary to collect the ratifications of all states, keeping all parties informed of the situation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corwin Amendment</span> Proposed US constitutional amendment to protect slavery from federal power

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could still be adopted by the state legislatures. It would shield slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress. Although the Corwin Amendment does not explicitly use the word slavery, it was designed specifically to protect slavery from federal power. The outgoing 36th United States Congress proposed the Corwin Amendment on March 2, 1861, shortly before the outbreak of the American Civil War, with the intent of preventing that war and preserving the Union. It passed Congress but was not ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures.

Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which clarified that if the Congress of the United States—when proposing for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Article V thereof—chooses not to set a deadline by which the state legislatures of three-fourths of the states or, if prescribed by Congress state ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states, must act upon the proposed amendment, then the proposed amendment remains pending business before the state legislatures. The case centered on the Child Labor Amendment, which was proposed for ratification by Congress in 1924.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lyman Trumbull</span> American politician (1813–1896)

Lyman Trumbull was an American lawyer, judge, and politician who represented the state of Illinois in the United States Senate from 1855 to 1873. Trumbull was a leading abolitionist attorney and key political ally to Abraham Lincoln and authored several landmark pieces of reform as chair of the Judiciary Committee during the American Civil War and Reconstruction era, including the Confiscation Acts, which created the legal basis for the Emancipation Proclamation; the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished chattel slavery; and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which led to the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

A convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also referred to as an Article V Convention, state convention, or amendatory convention is one of two methods authorized by Article Five of the United States Constitution whereby amendments to the United States Constitution may be proposed: on the Application of two thirds of the State legislatures the Congress shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which become law only after ratification by three-fourths of the states. The Article V convention method has never been used; but 33 amendments have been proposed by the other method, a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress; and 27 of these have been ratified by three-fourths of the States. Although there has never been a federal constitutional convention since the original one, at the state level more than 230 constitutional conventions have assembled in the United States.

In the United States, term limits restrict the number of terms of office an officeholder may serve. At the federal level, the president of the United States can serve a maximum of two four-year terms, limited by the 22nd Amendment to the United States Constitution. Some State government offices are also term-limited, including executive, legislative, and judicial offices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Congressional Apportionment Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the US Constitution pertaining to the number of Representatives in the House

The Congressional Apportionment Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that addresses the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It was proposed by Congress on September 25, 1789, but was never ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment is still pending before the states. As of 2024, it is one of six unratified amendments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">57th Wisconsin Legislature</span> Wisconsin legislative term for 1925–1926

The Fifty-Seventh Wisconsin Legislature convened from January 14, 1925, to June 29, 1925, in regular session, and reconvened in a special session in April 1926.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">61st Wisconsin Legislature</span> Wisconsin legislative term for 1933–1934

The Sixty-First Wisconsin Legislature convened from January 11, 1933, to July 25, 1933, in regular session, and reconvened in a special session from December 11, 1933, to February 3, 1934.

References

  1. 1 2 65 Congressional Record 10142
  2. ↑ "The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Centennial Edition, Interim Edition: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 26, 2013" (PDF). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. p. 50. Retrieved July 11, 2014.
  3. ↑ "Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916". Our Documents. National Archives. Retrieved October 20, 2012.
  4. ↑ 65 Congressional Record 7294-7295
  5. 1 2 3 James J. Kilpatrick, ed. (1961). The Constitution of the United States and Amendments Thereto. Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government. pp. 68–69.
  6. ↑ Hickey, Daniel, ed. (1925). Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of Connecticut. State of Connecticut. p. 418.
  7. ↑ Baker, J. Frederick, ed. (1925). Journal of the Senate of the State of Connecticut. State of Connecticut. p. 379.
  8. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives at a session of the General Assembly. Milford Chronicle Publishing Company. 1925. p. 126.
  9. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the State of Delaware, at a session of the General Assembly. Milford Chronicle Publishing Company. 1925. p. 90.
  10. ↑ Journal of the State Senate of Florida of the Session of 1925. F. J. Appleyard. 1925. p. 172.
  11. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of Florida. Appleyard. p. 984.
  12. ↑ Acts and Resolutions of the General Assembly of Georgia. Stein Printing Co., State Printers. 1924. p. 833.
  13. ↑ "Archives of Maryland, Volume 0569, Page 1643 - Session Laws, 1927". msa.maryland.gov. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  14. ↑ "Massachusetts Federal Child Labor Law, Question 7 (1924)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  15. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the State of Missouri. 1925. p. 773.
  16. ↑ Journal of the House of the State of Missouri. 1925. p. 705.
  17. ↑ Public Laws and Resolutions Enacted by the Extra Session of the General Assembly of 1924. Mitchell Printing Company. 1924. p. 219.
  18. ↑ Journal of the House of Representatives of the First Session of the 77th General Assembly of the State of South Carolina. Joint Committee on Printing. 1925. p. 94.
  19. ↑ Journal of the Senate of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina. Gonzales and Bryan. 1925. p. 104.
  20. ↑ Journal of the Texas State Senate. 1925. pp. 127–8.
  21. ↑ Journal of the Texas House of Representatives. 1925. p. 206.
  22. ↑ "New York State Assembly | Bill Search and Legislative Information". www.nyassembly.gov. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  23. ↑ "SCR99 SD1 HD1 (2021)". Hawaii State Legislature . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  24. ↑ "SCR8 (2022)". Hawaii State Legislature . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  25. ↑ "2021 - S0438" (PDF). Rhode Island Senate . Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  26. ↑ "LR5 - Legislative resolution to ratify an amendment to the Constitution to the United States relating to regulation of child labor". Nebraska Legislature . Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  27. ↑ "RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES PERMITTING CONGRESS TO REGULATE CHILD LABOR". Connecticut General Assembly . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  28. ↑ "HJ0007". Maryland General Assembly. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  29. ↑ "HF 3275". Minnesota Legislature . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  30. ↑ Heldman, Jessica K. (May 10, 2023). "There is More Work to Be Done to Eliminate Oppressive Child Labor". American Constitution Society. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  31. ↑ Hiltzik, Michael (July 24, 2023). "Column: The carnage from the rollback of child labor laws is just starting". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  32. ↑ Wendling, Zach (March 3, 2023). "Supporters of child labor resolution say it could make Nebraska 'new champion' • Nebraska Examiner". Nebraska Examiner. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  33. ↑ Melita, Rick (March 4, 2024). "Revisiting Child Labor Laws in the New Gilded Age: A Call for Action". CT News Junkie. Retrieved March 17, 2024.
  34. ↑ "Testimony For Bill Number HJ-00217 In All Committees". Connecticut General Assembly. March 25, 2024. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  35. ↑ Vile, John R. (2003). Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789-2002. ABC-CLIO. p. 63. ISBN   9781851094288.
  36. ↑ Strauss, David A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press. pp. 125–126. ISBN   9780195377279.
  37. ↑ Griffin, Stephen M. (1998). American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics . Princeton University Press. p.  89. ISBN   9780691002408.
  38. ↑ Gresham Machen, J. (August 1934). "Mountains and Why We Love Them". Christianity Today.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.