Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Last updated

The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution addresses issues related to presidential succession and disability.

Contents

It clarifies that the vice president becomes president if the president dies, resigns, or is removed from office by impeachment. It also establishes the procedure for filling a vacancy in the office of the vice president. Additionally, the amendment provides for the temporary transfer of the president's powers and duties to the vice president, either on the president's initiative alone or on the initiative of the vice president together with a majority of the president's cabinet. In either case, the vice president becomes the acting president until the president's powers and duties are restored.

The amendment was submitted to the states on July 6, 1965, by the 89th Congress, and was adopted on February 10, 1967, the day the requisite number of states (38) ratified it. [1]

Text and effect

Section 1: Presidential succession

Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Section 1 clarifies that in the enumerated situations the vice president becomes president, instead of merely assuming the powers and duties of the presidency as acting president. [2] It operates automatically, without needing to be explicitly invoked. [3] : 108 

Section 2: Vice presidential vacancy

Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Section 2 provides a mechanism for filling a vacancy in the vice presidency. Before the Twenty-fifth Amendment, a vice-presidential vacancy continued until a new vice president took office at the start of the next presidential term; the vice presidency had become vacant several times due to death, resignation, or succession to the presidency, and these vacancies had often lasted several years. [2]

Section 3: President's declaration of inability

Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 3 allows the president to voluntarily transfer presidential authority to the vice president (for example, in anticipation of a medical procedure) by declaring in writing his inability to discharge the presidency's powers and duties. The vice president then assumes those powers and duties as acting president. [note 1] The vice president does not become president; the president remains in office without authority. The president regains those powers and duties upon declaring in writing his ability to discharge them. [3] : 112-3 

Section 4: Declaration by vice president and cabinet members of president's inability

Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department[ sic ] [note 2] [7] or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

Section 4 addresses the case of a president who cannot discharge the powers and duties of the presidency but also cannot, or does not, execute the voluntary declaration contemplated by Section 3. [3] : 117  It allows the vice president, together with a "majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide", [note 3] to issue a written declaration that the president is unable to discharge his duties. When such a declaration is sent to Congress, the vice president immediately becomes acting president, [note 4] while (as with Section 3) the president remains in office, temporarily divested of authority. [9]

John Feerick, the principal draftsman of the amendment, [3] : xii,xx  [4] : 5  [10] writes that Congress deliberately left the terms unable and inability undefined "since cases of inability could take various forms not neatly fitting into [a rigid] definition ... The debates surrounding the Twenty-fifth Amendment indicate that [those terms] are intended to cover all cases in which some condition or circumstance prevents the President from discharging his powers and duties".  [3] : 112  A survey of scholarship on the amendment found

no specific threshold—medical or otherwise—for the "inability" contemplated in Section 4. The framers specifically rejected any definition of the term, prioritizing flexibility. Those implementing Section 4 should focus on whether—in an objective sense taking all of the circumstances into account—the President is "unable to discharge the powers and duties" of the office. The amendment does not require that any particular type or amount of evidence be submitted to determine that the President is unable to perform his duties. While the framers did imagine that medical evidence would be helpful to the determination of whether the President is unable, neither medical expertise nor diagnosis is required for a determination of inability ... To be sure, foremost in [the minds of the framers] was a physical or mental impairment. But the text of Section 4 sets forth a flexible standard intentionally designed to apply to a wide variety of unforeseen emergencies. [4] : 7,20 

Among potential examples of such unforeseen emergencies, legal scholars have listed kidnapping of the president and "political emergencies" such as impeachment. Traits such as unpopularity, incompetence, impeachable conduct, poor judgment, or laziness might not in themselves constitute inability, but should such traits "rise to a level where they prevented the President from carrying out his or her constitutional duties, they still might constitute an inability, even in the absence of a formal medical diagnosis." In addition, a president who already manifested disabling traits at the time he was elected is not thereby immunized from a declaration of inability. [4] : 21n63,22n67 

The "principal officers of the executive department[s]" are the 15 Cabinet members enumerated in the United States Code at 5 U.S.C.   § 101: [11] [12]

Acting secretaries can participate in issuing the declaration. [3] : 117-8  [4] : 13 

If the president subsequently issues a declaration claiming to be able, then a four-day period begins during which the vice president remains acting president. [3] : 118-9  [4] : 38n137  If, by the end of this period, the vice president and a majority of the "principal officers" have not issued a second declaration of the president's inability, the president resumes his powers and duties; but if they do issue a second declaration within the four days, then the vice president remains acting president while Congress considers the matter. Then, if within 21 days the Senate and the House determine, each by a two-thirds vote, that the president is unable, the vice president continues as acting president; otherwise the president resumes his powers and duties. [note 5]

Section 4's requirement of a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate is stricter than the Constitution's requirement for impeachment and removal of the president for "high crimes and misdemeanors"—a majority of the House followed by two-thirds of the Senate. [3] : 120n  [14] [15] [16] In addition, an impeached president retains his authority unless and until the Senate votes to remove him or her at the end of an impeachment trial; in contrast, should Congress be called upon to decide the question of the president's ability or inability under Section 4, presidential authority remains in the hands of the vice president (as acting president) unless and until the question is resolved in the president's favor. [3] : 118–20 

Historical background

Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution reads:

In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President ...

This provision is ambiguous as to whether, in the enumerated circumstances, the vice president becomes the president or merely assumes the "powers and duties" of the presidency. It also fails to define what constitutes inability or how questions concerning inability are to be resolved. [17] The Twenty-fifth Amendment addresses these deficiencies. [2] The ambiguities in Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution regarding death, resignation, removal, or disability of the president created difficulties several times:

On the death of William Henry Harrison, John Tyler (pictured) became the first vice president to succeed to the presidency. Tyler Daguerreotype (restoration).jpg
On the death of William Henry Harrison, John Tyler (pictured) became the first vice president to succeed to the presidency.

The 1951 novel The Caine Mutiny and its 1954 film version influenced the amendment's drafters. John D. Feerick told The Washington Post in 2018 that the film was a "live depiction" of the type of crisis that could arise "if a president ever faced questions about physical or mental inabilities but disagreed completely with the judgment", a situation the Constitution did not address. Lawmakers and lawyers drafting the amendment wanted no such "Article 184 situation" in which the vice president or others could depose the president merely by saying that he was "disabled". [25]

Proposal, enactment, and ratification

Keating–Kefauver proposal

In 1963, Senator Kenneth Keating of New York proposed a Constitutional amendment that would have enabled Congress to enact legislation providing for how to determine when a president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the presidency, rather than, as the Twenty-fifth Amendment does, having the Constitution so provide. [26] : 345  This proposal was based upon a recommendation of the American Bar Association in 1960. [26] : 27 

The text of the proposal read: [26] : 350 

In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the said office shall devolve on the Vice President. In case of the inability of the President to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the said powers and duties shall devolve on the Vice President, until the inability be removed. The Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then be President, or, in case of inability, act as President, and such officer shall be or act as President accordingly, until a President shall be elected or, in case of inability, until the inability shall be earlier removed. The commencement and termination of any inability shall be determined by such method as Congress shall by law provide.

Senators raised concerns that the Congress could either abuse such authority [26] : 30  or neglect to enact any such legislation after the adoption of this proposal. [26] : 34–35  Tennessee senator Estes Kefauver, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, a longtime advocate for addressing the disability question, spearheaded the effort until he died in August 1963. [26] : 28  Keating was defeated in the 1964 election, but Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska took up Keating's cause as a new member of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments. [24]

Kennedy assassination

By the 1960s, medical advances had made it increasingly plausible that an injured or ill president might live a long time while incapacitated. The assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963 underscored the need for a clear procedure for determining presidential disability, [27] particularly since the new president, Lyndon B. Johnson, had once suffered a heart attack [28] and—with the office of vice president to remain vacant until the next term began on January 20, 1965—the next two people in the line of succession were the 71-year-old speaker of the House, John McCormack, [27] and the 86-year-old Senate president pro tempore, Carl Hayden. [27] [29] Senator Birch Bayh succeeded Kefauver as chairman of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments and set about advocating a detailed amendment dealing with presidential disability. [27]

Bayh–Celler proposal

The Twenty-fifth Amendment in the National Archives
25th Amendment Pg1of2 AC.jpg
25th Amendment Pg2of2 AC.jpg

On January 6, 1965, Senator Birch Bayh proposed S.J. Res. 1 in the Senate and Representative Emanuel Celler (Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee) proposed H.J. Res. 1 in the House of Representatives. Their proposal specified the process by which a president could be declared "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", thereby making the vice president an acting president, and how the president could regain the powers of his office. Their proposal also provided a way to fill a vacancy in the office of vice president before the next presidential election. This was as opposed to the Keating–Kefauver proposal, which provided neither for filling a vacancy in the office of vice president before the next presidential election nor a process for determining presidential disability. In 1964, the American Bar Association endorsed the type of proposal Bayh and Celler advocated. [26] : 348–350  On January 28, 1965, President Johnson endorsed S.J. Res. 1 in a statement to Congress. [24] The proposal received bipartisan support. [5] : 6 

On February 19, the Senate passed the amendment, but the House passed a different version of the amendment on April 13. On April 22 it was returned to the Senate with revisions. [24] There were four areas of disagreement between the House and Senate versions:

On July 6, after a conference committee ironed out differences between the versions, [30] the amendment's final version passed both houses of Congress and was presented to the states for ratification. [note 6] [26] : 354–358 

Ratification

Nebraska was the first state to ratify the amendment, on July 12, 1965, and ratification became complete when Nevada became the 38th state to ratify it, on February 10, 1967. [note 7]

When President Lyndon B. Johnson underwent planned surgery in 1965, he was unable to temporarily transfer power to Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey because the amendment's ratification remained incomplete. On February 23, 1967, at the White House ceremony certifying the ratification, Johnson said:

It was 180 years ago, in the closing days of the Constitutional Convention, that the Founding Fathers debated the question of Presidential disability. John Dickinson of Delaware asked this question: "What is the extent of the term 'disability' and who is to be the judge of it?" No one replied. It is hard to believe that until last week our Constitution provided no clear answer. Now, at last, the 25th amendment clarifies the crucial clause that provides for succession to the Presidency and for filling a Vice Presidential vacancy. [34]

Invocations

Sections 1 and 2: Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Nelson Rockefeller

On October 10, 1973, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned, following a controversy over his personal taxes; two days later, President Richard Nixon nominated Representative Gerald Ford to replace Agnew as vice president pursuant to Section 2. Ford was confirmed by the Senate and the House on November 27 and December 6, respectively, and sworn in on December 6. [35]

On August 9, 1974, Nixon resigned due to the Watergate scandal and Ford became president under Section 1, the only president never to have been elected to either the presidency or the vice presidency. [36] The office of vice president was thus again vacant, and on August 20 Ford nominated former New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. [3] : 167–169  Rockefeller was confirmed by the Senate and the House on December 10 and 19, respectively, and sworn in on December 19. [3] : 186–187 

Feerick writes that the Twenty-fifth Amendment helped pave the way for Nixon's resignation during the Watergate scandal. Nixon and Agnew were Republicans, and in the months immediately following Agnew's resignation, with the vice presidency empty, Nixon's removal or resignation would have transferred the presidential powers to House Speaker Carl Albert, a Democrat. But once Ford, a Republican, became vice president under Section 2, Nixon's removal became more palatable because it would not change the party holding the presidency, and therefore "the momentum for exposing the truth about Nixon's involvement in Watergate increased".  [3] : 158 

Section 3

On December 22, 1978, President Jimmy Carter considered invoking Section 3 in advance of hemorrhoid surgery. [37] Since then, presidents Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump also contemplated invoking Section 3 at various times without doing so. [38] According to Stephanie Grisham, Trump underwent a colonoscopy without anesthesia in November 2019, likely to avoid having to invoke Section 3. [39]

1985: Ronald Reagan - George H. W. Bush as acting president

On July 12, 1985, President Ronald Reagan underwent a colonoscopy and was diagnosed with bowel cancer. He elected to have the lesion removed immediately, [40] and consulted with White House counsel Fred Fielding about whether to invoke Section 3, and in particular about whether doing so would set an undesirable precedent. Fielding and White House Chief of Staff Donald Regan recommended that Reagan transfer power, and two letters were drafted: one specifically invoking Section 3, the other mentioning only that Reagan was mindful of its provisions. On July 13, Reagan signed the letter mentioning that he was mindful of Section 3 [41] before being placed under general anesthesia for a colectomy, [42] and Vice President George H. W. Bush was acting president from 11:28 a.m. until 7:22 pm, when Reagan transmitted a letter declaring himself able to resume his duties. [43]

In the Fordham Law Review , commentator John Feerick asserted that although Reagan disclaimed any use of the Twenty-fifth Amendment in his letter (likely out of "fear of the reaction of the country and the world to a 'President' who admitted to being disabled, and concern ... [over] set[ting] a harmful precedent"), he followed the process set forth in Section 3. Furthermore, Feerick noted that "no constitutional provision except the Twenty-Fifth Amendment would have allowed" him to designate the vice president as acting president. Reagan later wrote in a memoir that he had, in fact, invoked the Twenty-fifth Amendment. [44]

2002 and 2007: George W. Bush - Dick Cheney as acting president

On June 29, 2002, President George W. Bush explicitly invoked Section 3 in temporarily transferring his powers to Vice President Dick Cheney before undergoing a colonoscopy, which began at 7:09 am. Bush awoke about forty minutes later, but refrained from resuming his presidential powers until 9:24 a.m. to ensure that no aftereffects remained. [41] [45] According to his staff, Cheney (as acting president) held his regular national security and homeland security meetings with aides at the White House, but made no appearances and took no recorded actions while acting president. [45]

On July 21, 2007, Bush invoked Section 3 before another colonoscopy. Cheney was acting president from 7:16 a.m. until 9:21 am. [41] During that time, Cheney remained at home. [46] Neither invocation received much attention in the press. [46]

In the view of commentator Adam Gustafson, George W. Bush's unambiguous application of Section 3 "rectified" President Reagan's "ambivalent invocation" and provided an example of a "smooth and temporary transition" under Section 3 that paved the way for future applications. The two invocations established the reasonableness of invocation for relatively minor inabilities, promoting continuity in the Executive Branch. [46]

2021: Joe Biden - Kamala Harris as acting president

On November 19, 2021, President Joe Biden temporarily transferred his powers and duties to Vice President Kamala Harris before undergoing a colonoscopy, making her acting president from 10:10 a.m. until 11:35 a.m. This is the first time a woman held the powers and duties of the president of the United States. [47] [48]

Section 4

Section 4 has never been invoked.[ citation needed ]

Considered invocations of Section 4

1981: Reagan assassination attempt

Draft Section 3 letter prepared (though never signed) after Ronald Reagan was shot on March 30, 1981 25th Amendment draft letters for Reagan or Cabinet after March 1981 assassination attempt.pdf
Draft Section 3 letter prepared (though never signed) after Ronald Reagan was shot on March 30, 1981
Draft Section 4 letter prepared (though never signed) after Ronald Reagan was shot on March 30, 1981 25th Amendment draft letters for Reagan or Cabinet after March 1981 assassination attempt.pdf
Draft Section 4 letter prepared (though never signed) after Ronald Reagan was shot on March 30, 1981

Following the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981, Vice President George H. W. Bush did not assume the presidential powers and duties as acting president. Reagan had been rushed into surgery with no opportunity to invoke Section 3; Bush did not invoke Section 4 because he was on a plane at the time of the shooting, and Reagan was out of surgery by the time Bush landed in Washington. [49] In 1995, Birch Bayh, the primary sponsor of the amendment in the Senate, wrote that Section 4 should have been invoked. [50] Physician to the President Daniel Ruge, who supervised Reagan's treatment immediately after the shooting, said he had erred by not having Reagan invoke Section 3 because Reagan needed general anesthesia and was in an intensive care unit. [51]

2021: Trump and the Capitol attack

After the January 6 United States Capitol attack, President Donald Trump was accused of having incited the incident, [52] [53] [54] and by evening some of his Cabinet members were reportedly considering trying to get Vice President Pence to agree to invoke Section 4. [55]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ As acting president, the vice president may employ "all the powers and tools of the office of the president", taking actions such as moving troops, reporting on the state of the Union, proposing budgets, nominating judges, and removing cabinet secretaries. [4] : 44  But it is unclear whether the vice president, while acting president, retains all the powers and duties of the vice presidency; for example, authorities express reservation as to whether the vice president would continue to preside over the Senate, especially since doing so could put him or her in the position of overseeing the Senate's deliberations on the validity of his or her determination, under Section 4, that the president is unable to discharge his or her duties. [3] : 44n155  Article I, Section 3, clause 5 of the Constitution provides that, "The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States."  [5] : 3 
  2. ↑ Here the word department should read departments. Feerick has written that on the very day the Senate was to vote on the amendment, "I noticed a scrivener's error in the draft of the conference report. When I reached Senator Bayh's staff by telephone, possibly on July 6, with my observation, I was told that the amendment had just been approved that day by the Senate, 68 to 5, and was on its way to the states for ratification. In other words, the amendment was beyond rescue for correction."  [6] : 1101 
  3. ↑ No such "other body" has ever been designated, [3] : 120  though there have been proposals. [8] Congress's discretion in designating such a body and how it would deliberate is "vast" –it could even designate itself [4] : 16  –but any designating act would be subject to presidential veto (which in turn can be overridden by two-thirds of both the House and Senate) just like any other statute. [4] : 14  Should such a body be created, it would become the only body capable of acting in concert with the vice president under Section 4; the fifteen cabinet officers would no longer have a role. [4] : 14-15  However, the vice president's participation is essential, and vacancy in the vice presidency rules out invocation of Section 4. [3] : 121 
  4. ↑ The transfer of power to the vice president occurs at the moment the declaration is sent to the Speaker and President pro tempore, not at the moment of receipt, [4] : 39  [3] : 118  whether or not Congress is in session at the time of transmittal is immaterial. [3] : 118 
  5. ↑ If Congress is in session when it receives the second declaration of incapacity, the 21 days begins at that point; otherwise they begin at the end of the 48 hours given for Congress to assemble. The president resumes his powers and duties when either the Senate or the House holds a vote on the question which falls short of the two-thirds requirement, or the 21 days pass without both votes having been taken. [4] : 52  [13]
  6. ↑ On February 19, the Senate passed its version unanimously (72–0 with 28 absent on business or illness, but all 28 announced they would have voted "yea").
    On April 13, the House passed its version 368–29 with 36 not voting (30 of the 36 coming from 15 pairs, unofficially 383–44).
    On June 30, the House agreed to the conference committee's report by unanimous consent.
    On July 6, the Senate agreed to the report 68–5 with 27 absent on business (7 announced they would have voted "yea", 8 made no announcement, and 12 formed four 2–1 pairs with two "yea" votes paired to one "nay" vote, unofficially 83–9). [31]
  7. ↑ The states ratified as follows: [32]
    1. Nebraska (July 12, 1965)
    2. Wisconsin (July 13, 1965)
    3. Oklahoma (July 16, 1965)
    4. Massachusetts (August 9, 1965)
    5. Pennsylvania (August 18, 1965)
    6. Kentucky (September 15, 1965)
    7. Arizona (September 22, 1965)
    8. Michigan (October 5, 1965)
    9. Indiana (October 20, 1965)
    10. California (October 21, 1965)
    11. Arkansas (November 4, 1965)
    12. New Jersey (November 29, 1965)
    13. Delaware (December 7, 1965)
    14. Utah (January 17, 1966)
    15. West Virginia (January 20, 1966)
    16. Maine (January 24, 1966)
    17. Rhode Island (January 28, 1966)
    18. Colorado (February 3, 1966)
    19. New Mexico (February 3, 1966)
    20. Kansas (February 8, 1966)
    21. Vermont (February 10, 1966)
    22. Alaska (February 18, 1966)
    23. Idaho (March 2, 1966)
    24. Hawaii (March 3, 1966)
    25. Virginia (March 8, 1966)
    26. Mississippi (March 10, 1966)
    27. New York (March 14, 1966)
    28. Maryland (March 23, 1966)
    29. Missouri (March 30, 1966)
    30. New Hampshire (June 13, 1966)
    31. Louisiana (July 5, 1966)
    32. Tennessee (January 12, 1967)
    33. Wyoming (January 25, 1967)
    34. Washington (January 26, 1967)
    35. Iowa (January 26, 1967)
    36. Oregon (February 2, 1967)
    37. Minnesota (February 10, 1967)
    38. Nevada (February 10, 1967, at which point ratification was complete) [33]
    39. Connecticut (February 14, 1967)
    40. Montana (February 15, 1967)
    41. South Dakota (March 6, 1967)
    42. Ohio (March 7, 1967)
    43. Alabama (March 14, 1967)
    44. North Carolina (March 22, 1967)
    45. Illinois (March 22, 1967)
    46. Texas (April 25, 1967)
    47. Florida (May 25, 1967)
    The following states have not ratified:
    1. Georgia
    2. North Dakota
    3. South Carolina

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">President of the United States</span> Head of state and government of the United States

The president of the United States (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States. The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Two of the United States Constitution</span> Portion of the US Constitution regarding the executive branch

Article Two of the United States Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government, which carries out and enforces federal laws. Article Two vests the power of the executive branch in the office of the President of the United States, lays out the procedures for electing and removing the President, and establishes the President's powers and responsibilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1804 amendment regulating presidential elections

The Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the procedure for electing the president and vice president. It replaced the procedure in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3, under which the Electoral College originally functioned. The amendment was proposed by Congress on December 9, 1803, and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15, 1804. The new rules took effect for the 1804 presidential election and have governed all subsequent presidential elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1933 amendment changing term dates for elected federal officials

The Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution moved the beginning and ending of the terms of the president and vice president from March 4 to January 20, and of members of Congress from March 4 to January 3. It also has provisions that determine what is to be done when there is no president-elect. The Twentieth Amendment was adopted on January 23, 1933.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vice President of the United States</span> Second-highest constitutional office in the United States

The vice president of the United States (VPOTUS) is the second-highest ranking office in the executive branch of the U.S. federal government, after the president of the United States, and ranks first in the presidential line of succession. The vice president is also an officer in the legislative branch, as the president of the Senate. In this capacity, the vice president is empowered to preside over the United States Senate, but may not vote except to cast a tie-breaking vote. The vice president is indirectly elected at the same time as the president to a four-year term of office by the people of the United States through the Electoral College, but the electoral votes are cast separately for these two offices. Following the passage in 1967 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the US Constitution, a vacancy in the office of vice president may be filled by presidential nomination and confirmation by a majority vote in both houses of Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">President pro tempore of the United States Senate</span> Second-highest-ranking official of the US Senate

The president pro tempore of the United States Senate is the second-highest-ranking official of the United States Senate, after the vice president. According to Article One, Section Three of the United States Constitution, the vice president of the United States is the president of the Senate, and the Senate must choose a president pro tempore to act in the vice president's absence.

The United States Presidential Succession Act is a federal statute establishing the presidential line of succession. Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the United States Constitution authorizes Congress to enact such a statute:

Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1951 amendment limiting presidents to two terms

The Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution limits the number of times a person can be elected to the office of President of the United States to two terms, and sets additional eligibility conditions for presidents who succeed to the unexpired terms of their predecessors. Congress approved the Twenty-second Amendment on March 21, 1947, and submitted it to the state legislatures for ratification. That process was completed on February 27, 1951, when the requisite 36 of the 48 states had ratified the amendment, and its provisions came into force on that date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States presidential line of succession</span> Order of assuming powers of US presidency

The United States presidential line of succession is the order in which the vice president of the United States and other officers of the United States federal government assume the powers and duties of the U.S. presidency upon an elected president's death, resignation, removal from office, or incapacity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal government of the United States</span> National government of the United States

The federal government of the United States is the common government of the United States, a federal republic located primarily in North America, comprising 50 states, five major self-governing territories, several island possessions, and the federal district of Washington, D.C., where the majority of the federal government is based.

A presidency is an administration or the executive, the collective administrative and governmental entity that exists around an office of president of a state or nation. Although often the executive branch of government, and often personified by a single elected person who holds the office of "president", in practice, the presidency includes a much larger collective of people, such as chiefs of staff, advisers and other bureaucrats. Although often led by a single person, presidencies can also be of a collective nature, such as the presidency of the European Union is held on a rotating basis by the various national governments of the member states. Alternatively, the term presidency can also be applied to the governing authority of some churches, and may even refer to the holder of a non-governmental office of president in a corporation, business, charity, university, etc. or the institutional arrangement around them. For example, "the presidency of the Red Cross refused to support his idea." Rules and support to discourage vicarious liability leading to unnecessary pressure and the early termination of term have not been clarified. These may not be as yet supported by state let initiatives. Contributory liability and fraud may be the two most common ways to become removed from term of office and/or to prevent re-election.

An acting president of the United States is a person who lawfully exercises the powers and duties of the president of the United States despite not holding the office in their own right. There is an established presidential line of succession in which officials of the United States federal government may be called upon to be acting president if the incumbent president becomes incapacitated, dies, resigns, is removed from office during their four-year term of office; or if a president-elect has not been chosen before Inauguration Day or has failed to qualify by that date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brazilian presidential line of succession</span> Line of succession of the post of president of Brazil

The presidential line of succession defines who may become or act as President of the Federative Republic of Brazil upon the death, resignation, incapacity or removal from office of the elected president, and also when the president is out of the country or is suspended due to impeachment proceedings.

The presiding officer of the United States Senate is the person who presides over the United States Senate and is charged with maintaining order and decorum, recognizing members to speak, and interpreting the Senate's rules, practices, and precedents. Senate presiding officer is a role, not an actual office. The actual role is usually performed by one of three officials: the vice president of the United States; an elected United States senator; or, under certain circumstances, the chief justice of the United States. Outside the constitutionally mandated roles, the actual appointment of a person to do the job of presiding over the Senate as a body is governed by Rule I of the Standing Rules.

Bills have been introduced in the US Congress on several occasions to amend the US Constitution to abolish or to reduce the power of the Electoral College and to provide for the direct popular election of the US president and vice president.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">President-elect of the United States</span> Winner of the U.S. presidential election before inauguration

The president-elect of the United States is the candidate who has presumptively won the United States presidential election and is awaiting inauguration to become the president. There is no explicit indication in the U.S. Constitution as to when that person actually becomes president-elect, although the Twentieth Amendment uses the term "president-elect", thereby giving the term constitutional basis. It is assumed the Congressional certification of votes cast by the Electoral College of the United States – occurring after the third day of January following the swearing-in of the new Congress, per provisions of the Twelfth Amendment – unambiguously confirms the successful candidate as the official "president-elect" under the U.S. Constitution. As an unofficial term, president-elect has been used by the media since at least the latter half of the 19th century and was in use by politicians since at least the 1790s. Politicians and the media have applied the term to the projected winner, even on election night, and very few who turned out to lose have been referred to as such.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Powers of the United States Congress</span>

Powers of the United States Congress are implemented by the United States Constitution, defined by rulings of the Supreme Court, and by its own efforts and by other factors such as history and custom. It is the chief legislative body of the United States. Some powers are explicitly defined by the Constitution and are called enumerated powers; others have been assumed to exist and are called implied powers.

The Philippine presidential line of succession defines who becomes or acts as president upon the incapacity, death, resignation, or removal from office of a sitting president or a president-elect.

An officer of the United States is a functionary of the executive or judicial branches of the federal government of the United States to whom is delegated some part of the country's sovereign power. The term officer of the United States is not a title, but a term of classification for a certain type of official.

References

  1. ↑ Mount, Steve. "Ratification of Constitutional Amendments". ussconstitution.net. Archived from the original on April 23, 2018. Retrieved July 20, 2018.
  2. 1 2 3 "Interpretation: The Twenty-Fifth Amendment | The National Constitution Center". constitutioncenter.org.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Feerick, John D. (2014). The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Its Complete History and Applications. Fordham University Press. ISBN   978-0-8232-5201-5.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Yale Law School Rule of Law Clinic (2018). The Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution: A Reader's Guide (PDF).
  5. 1 2 "Presidential Disability: An Overview" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. July 12, 1999. p. 6. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
  6. ↑ Feerick, John D. (2017). "The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: A Personal Remembrance". Fordham Law Review. Vol. 86, no. 3. pp. 1075–1110.
  7. ↑ Bayh, Birch and Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee; Committee on the Judiciary. Senate. United States., "Selected Materials on the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, Senate Document No. 93-42." (1973). Congressional Materials. 17.
  8. ↑ Raskin, Jamie (October 9, 2020). "H.R.8548 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of the Office Act". www.congress.gov.
  9. ↑ Bomboy, Scott (October 12, 2017). "Can the Cabinet "remove" a President using the 25th amendment?". The Constitution Center. Archived from the original on January 8, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
  10. ↑ Saxon, Wolfgang (December 13, 1981). "John D. Feerick named dean of Fordham Law". The New York Times. p. 61.
  11. ↑ "Operation of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment Respecting Presidential Succession" (PDF). United States Department Of Justice.
  12. ↑ Prokop, Andrew (January 2, 2018). "The 25th Amendment, explained: how a president can be declared unfit to serve". Vox. Archived from the original on June 6, 2017. Retrieved August 9, 2018.
  13. ↑ Kalt, Brian C. (2012). Constitutional cliffhangers: a legal guide for presidents and their enemies. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-12351-7. OCLC   842262440.
  14. ↑ United States Constitution, Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7.
  15. ↑ "The 25th Amendment: The Difficult Process to Remove a President". The New York Times. September 6, 2018.
  16. ↑ Neale, Thomas H. (November 5, 2018). Presidential Disability Under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Constitutional Provisions and Perspectives for Congress (PDF). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved November 11, 2018.
  17. ↑ Feerick, John. "Essays on Article II: Presidential Succession". The Heritage Guide to the Constitution. The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on August 22, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2018.
  18. ↑ Chitwood, Oliver. John Tyler: Champion of the Old South. American Political Biography Press, 1990, p. 206
  19. ↑ "John Tyler". The White House. White House Historical Association. Retrieved January 22, 2018.
  20. ↑ "John Tyler, Tenth Vice President (1841)". Senate.gov. Retrieved April 29, 2009.
  21. ↑ Schlimgen, Joan (January 23, 2012). "Woodrow Wilson – Strokes and Denial". Arizona Health Sciences Library. Archived from the original on July 3, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2015.
  22. ↑ Kalt, Brian C.; Pozen, David. "The Twenty-fifth Amendment". The Interactive Constitution. Philadelphia, PA: The National Constitution Center. Archived from the original on September 4, 2019. Retrieved July 20, 2018.
  23. ↑ Amar, Akhil Reed; Amar, Vikram David (November 1995). "Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?". Stanford Law Review R. 48 (1): 113–139. doi:10.2307/1229151. ISSN   0038-9765.
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 "25th Constitutional Amendment". The Great Society Congress. Association of Centers for the Study of Congress. Archived from the original on April 20, 2016. Retrieved April 6, 2016.
  25. ↑ Flynn, Meagan (September 10, 2018). "How 'The Caine Mutiny' and the paranoid Capt. Queeg influenced the 25th Amendment's drafters, making it harder to sideline a president". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bayh, Birch (1968). One Heartbeat Away. ISBN   978-0-672-51160-8.
  27. 1 2 3 4 How JFK's assassination led to a constitutional amendment Archived January 6, 2014, at the Wayback Machine , National Constitution Center, Accessed January 6, 2013
  28. ↑ What is the 25th Amendment and When Has It Been Invoked? History News Network, Accessed January 6, 2013
  29. ↑ Presidential Succession During the Johnson Administration Archived January 3, 2014, at the Wayback Machine LBJ Library, Accessed January 6, 2014
  30. ↑ "Presidential Inability and Vacancies in the Office of the Vice President" (PDF). The Association of Centers for the Study of Congress.
  31. ↑ "The Twenty-Fifth Amendment and Presidential Inability, Part 6: Final Approval and Implementation". Congressional Research Service.
  32. ↑ "Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation" (PDF). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, Library of Congress. August 26, 2017. pp. 3–44. Retrieved July 20, 2018.
  33. ↑ Chadwick, John (February 11, 1967). "With Ratification of Amendment Two Gaps In Constitution Plugged". The Florence Times. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved July 20, 2018– via Google news.
  34. ↑ Johnson, Lyndon B. (February 23, 1967). "Remarks at Ceremony Marking the Ratification of the Presidential Inability (25th) Amendment to the Constitution". Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. Santa Barbara, CA: The American Presidency Project. Retrieved June 20, 2018.
  35. ↑ Hunter, Marjorie (December 7, 1973). "Ford Sworn In As Vice President After House Approves, 387-85; He Vows Equal Justice For All". The New York Times . Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  36. ↑ Memorial Services in the Congress of the United States and Tributes in Eulogy of Gerald R. Ford, Late a President of the United States. Government Printing Office. 2007. p. 35. ISBN   978-0-16-079762-0.
  37. ↑ Lipshutz, Robert J. (December 22, 1978). "Documents from Carter's Contemplated Use of Section 3 (1978)". Fordham Law School . Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  38. ↑ Second Fordham University School of Law Clinic on Presidential Succession (December 1, 2017). "Fifty Years After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Recommendations for Improving the Presidential Succession System". Fordham Law Review. 86 (3). Fordham Law School: 927. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  39. ↑ McGraw, Meridith (October 7, 2021). "The inside scope: How ego led Trump to hide a colonoscopy". Politico.
  40. ↑ Altman, Lawrence (July 18, 1985). "Report that Early Test was Urged Stirs Debate on Reagan Treatment". The New York Times. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  41. 1 2 3 "Historical Invocations of the 25th Amendment". Archived from the original on July 7, 2011.
  42. ↑ Sorensen, Robert H. (July 2014). "President Reagan's Life Saving Colectomy and Subsequent Historical Implications". Military Medicine . 179 (7): 704–7. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00034 . PMID   25003852.
  43. ↑ "List of Vice-Presidents Who Served as "Acting" President Under the 25th Amendment". The American Presidency Project. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  44. ↑ Feerick, John D. (2010). "Presidential Succession and Inability: Before and After the Twenty-Fifth Amendment". Fordham Law Review . 79 (3): 89–90. Archived from the original on October 11, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  45. 1 2 Allen, Mike (June 30, 2002). "Bush Resumes Power After Test". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  46. 1 2 3 Gustafson, Adam R.F. (Spring 2009). "Presidential Inability and Subjective Meaning". Yale Law & Policy Review . 27 (2): 487–490. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  47. ↑ Biden, Joseph (November 19, 2021). "Letter to the Speaker of the House on the Temporary Transfer of the Powers and Duties of President of the United States" (PDF). The White House. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  48. ↑ Biden, Joseph (November 19, 2021). "Letter to Senator Leahy on Resuming the Powers and Duties of President of the United States" (PDF). The White House. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  49. ↑ Baker, James (speaker)."Remembering the Assassination Attempt on Ronald Reagan Archived July 11, 2018, at the Wayback Machine ". Larry King Live, March 30, 2001.
  50. ↑ Bayh, Birch (April 8, 1995). "The White House Safety Net". The New York Times . Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved September 17, 2017.
  51. ↑ Altman, Lawrence K. (September 6, 2005). "Daniel Ruge, 88, Dies; Cared for Reagan After Shooting". The New York Times. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  52. ↑ Ting, Eric (January 6, 2021). "After Trump supporters storm Capitol, Rep. Ted Lieu calls for Trump's immediate removal from office". SFGATE . Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  53. ↑ Kevin Stankiewicz (January 6, 2021). "Ex-Defense secretary: Trump's Cabinet should invoke 25th Amendment to remove him from office". CNBC . Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  54. ↑ Rachel Tillman (January 6, 2021). "Lawmakers, Business Execs Urge Pence to Invoke 25th Amendment". Spectrum Local News. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  55. ↑ Acosta, Jim (January 6, 2021). "Some Cabinet members holding preliminary talks about invoking 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office". CNN. Retrieved January 6, 2021.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.