![]() | This article duplicates the scope of other articles, specifically Prime number theorem.(December 2024) |
In mathematics, the prime-counting function is the function counting the number of prime numbers less than or equal to some real number x. [1] [2] It is denoted by π(x) (unrelated to the number π).
A symmetric variant seen sometimes is π0(x), which is equal to π(x) − 1⁄2 if x is exactly a prime number, and equal to π(x) otherwise. That is, the number of prime numbers less than x, plus half if x equals a prime.
Of great interest in number theory is the growth rate of the prime-counting function. [3] [4] It was conjectured in the end of the 18th century by Gauss and by Legendre to be approximately where log is the natural logarithm, in the sense that This statement is the prime number theorem. An equivalent statement is where li is the logarithmic integral function. The prime number theorem was first proved in 1896 by Jacques Hadamard and by Charles de la Vallée Poussin independently, using properties of the Riemann zeta function introduced by Riemann in 1859. Proofs of the prime number theorem not using the zeta function or complex analysis were found around 1948 by Atle Selberg and by Paul Erdős (for the most part independently). [5]
In 1899, de la Vallée Poussin proved that [6] for some positive constant a. Here, O(...) is the big O notation.
More precise estimates of π(x) are now known. For example, in 2002, Kevin Ford proved that [7]
Mossinghoff and Trudgian proved [8] an explicit upper bound for the difference between π(x) and li(x):
For values of x that are not unreasonably large, li(x) is greater than π(x). However, π(x) − li(x) is known to change sign infinitely many times. For a discussion of this, see Skewes' number.
For x > 1 let π0(x) = π(x) − 1/2 when x is a prime number, and π0(x) = π(x) otherwise. Bernhard Riemann, in his work On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude , proved that π0(x) is equal to [9]
where μ(n) is the Möbius function, li(x) is the logarithmic integral function, ρ indexes every zero of the Riemann zeta function, and li(xρ/n) is not evaluated with a branch cut but instead considered as Ei(ρ/n log x) where Ei(x) is the exponential integral. If the trivial zeros are collected and the sum is taken only over the non-trivial zeros ρ of the Riemann zeta function, then π0(x) may be approximated by [10]
The Riemann hypothesis suggests that every such non-trivial zero lies along Re(s) = 1/2.
The table shows how the three functions π(x), x/log x, and li(x) compared at powers of 10. See also, [3] [11] and [12]
x | π(x) | π(x) − x/log x | li(x) − π(x) | x/π(x) | x/log x % error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2.500 | −8.57% |
102 | 25 | 3 | 5 | 4.000 | +13.14% |
103 | 168 | 23 | 10 | 5.952 | +13.83% |
104 | 1,229 | 143 | 17 | 8.137 | +11.66% |
105 | 9,592 | 906 | 38 | 10.425 | +9.45% |
106 | 78,498 | 6,116 | 130 | 12.739 | +7.79% |
107 | 664,579 | 44,158 | 339 | 15.047 | +6.64% |
108 | 5,761,455 | 332,774 | 754 | 17.357 | +5.78% |
109 | 50,847,534 | 2,592,592 | 1,701 | 19.667 | +5.10% |
1010 | 455,052,511 | 20,758,029 | 3,104 | 21.975 | +4.56% |
1011 | 4,118,054,813 | 169,923,159 | 11,588 | 24.283 | +4.13% |
1012 | 37,607,912,018 | 1,416,705,193 | 38,263 | 26.590 | +3.77% |
1013 | 346,065,536,839 | 11,992,858,452 | 108,971 | 28.896 | +3.47% |
1014 | 3,204,941,750,802 | 102,838,308,636 | 314,890 | 31.202 | +3.21% |
1015 | 29,844,570,422,669 | 891,604,962,452 | 1,052,619 | 33.507 | +2.99% |
1016 | 279,238,341,033,925 | 7,804,289,844,393 | 3,214,632 | 35.812 | +2.79% |
1017 | 2,623,557,157,654,233 | 68,883,734,693,928 | 7,956,589 | 38.116 | +2.63% |
1018 | 24,739,954,287,740,860 | 612,483,070,893,536 | 21,949,555 | 40.420 | +2.48% |
1019 | 234,057,667,276,344,607 | 5,481,624,169,369,961 | 99,877,775 | 42.725 | +2.34% |
1020 | 2,220,819,602,560,918,840 | 49,347,193,044,659,702 | 222,744,644 | 45.028 | +2.22% |
1021 | 21,127,269,486,018,731,928 | 446,579,871,578,168,707 | 597,394,254 | 47.332 | +2.11% |
1022 | 201,467,286,689,315,906,290 | 4,060,704,006,019,620,994 | 1,932,355,208 | 49.636 | +2.02% |
1023 | 1,925,320,391,606,803,968,923 | 37,083,513,766,578,631,309 | 7,250,186,216 | 51.939 | +1.93% |
1024 | 18,435,599,767,349,200,867,866 | 339,996,354,713,708,049,069 | 17,146,907,278 | 54.243 | +1.84% |
1025 | 176,846,309,399,143,769,411,680 | 3,128,516,637,843,038,351,228 | 55,160,980,939 | 56.546 | +1.77% |
1026 | 1,699,246,750,872,437,141,327,603 | 28,883,358,936,853,188,823,261 | 155,891,678,121 | 58.850 | +1.70% |
1027 | 16,352,460,426,841,680,446,427,399 | 267,479,615,610,131,274,163,365 | 508,666,658,006 | 61.153 | +1.64% |
1028 | 157,589,269,275,973,410,412,739,598 | 2,484,097,167,669,186,251,622,127 | 1,427,745,660,374 | 63.456 | +1.58% |
1029 | 1,520,698,109,714,272,166,094,258,063 | 23,130,930,737,541,725,917,951,446 | 4,551,193,622,464 | 65.759 | +1.52% |
In the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, the π(x) column is sequence OEIS: A006880 , π(x) − x/log x is sequence OEIS: A057835 , and li(x) − π(x) is sequence OEIS: A057752 .
The value for π(1024) was originally computed by J. Buethe, J. Franke, A. Jost, and T. Kleinjung assuming the Riemann hypothesis. [13] It was later verified unconditionally in a computation by D. J. Platt. [14] The value for π(1025) is by the same four authors. [15] The value for π(1026) was computed by D. B. Staple. [16] All other prior entries in this table were also verified as part of that work.
The values for 1027, 1028, and 1029 were announced by David Baugh and Kim Walisch in 2015, [17] 2020, [18] and 2022, [19] respectively.
A simple way to find π(x), if x is not too large, is to use the sieve of Eratosthenes to produce the primes less than or equal to x and then to count them.
A more elaborate way of finding π(x) is due to Legendre (using the inclusion–exclusion principle): given x, if p1, p2,…, pn are distinct prime numbers, then the number of integers less than or equal to x which are divisible by no pi is
(where ⌊x⌋ denotes the floor function). This number is therefore equal to
when the numbers p1, p2,…, pn are the prime numbers less than or equal to the square root of x.
In a series of articles published between 1870 and 1885, Ernst Meissel described (and used) a practical combinatorial way of evaluating π(x): Let p1, p2,…, pn be the first n primes and denote by Φ(m,n) the number of natural numbers not greater than m which are divisible by none of the pi for any i ≤ n. Then
Given a natural number m, if n = π(3√m) and if μ = π(√m) − n, then
Using this approach, Meissel computed π(x), for x equal to 5×105, 106, 107, and 108.
In 1959, Derrick Henry Lehmer extended and simplified Meissel's method. Define, for real m and for natural numbers n and k, Pk(m,n) as the number of numbers not greater than m with exactly k prime factors, all greater than pn. Furthermore, set P0(m,n) = 1. Then
where the sum actually has only finitely many nonzero terms. Let y denote an integer such that 3√m ≤ y ≤ √m, and set n = π(y). Then P1(m,n) = π(m) − n and Pk(m,n) = 0 when k ≥ 3. Therefore,
The computation of P2(m,n) can be obtained this way:
where the sum is over prime numbers.
On the other hand, the computation of Φ(m,n) can be done using the following rules:
Using his method and an IBM 701, Lehmer was able to compute the correct value of π(109) and missed the correct value of π(1010) by 1. [20]
Further improvements to this method were made by Lagarias, Miller, Odlyzko, Deléglise, and Rivat. [21]
Other prime-counting functions are also used because they are more convenient to work with.
Riemann's prime-power counting function is usually denoted as Π0(x) or J0(x). It has jumps of 1/n at prime powers pn and it takes a value halfway between the two sides at the discontinuities of π(x). That added detail is used because the function may then be defined by an inverse Mellin transform.
Formally, we may define Π0(x) by
where the variable p in each sum ranges over all primes within the specified limits.
We may also write
where Λ is the von Mangoldt function and
The Möbius inversion formula then gives
where μ(n) is the Möbius function.
Knowing the relationship between the logarithm of the Riemann zeta function and the von Mangoldt function Λ, and using the Perron formula we have
The Chebyshev function weights primes or prime powers pn by log p:
For x ≥ 2, [22]
and
Formulas for prime-counting functions come in two kinds: arithmetic formulas and analytic formulas. Analytic formulas for prime-counting were the first used to prove the prime number theorem. They stem from the work of Riemann and von Mangoldt, and are generally known as explicit formulae. [23]
We have the following expression for the second Chebyshev function ψ:
where
Here ρ are the zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip, where the real part of ρ is between zero and one. The formula is valid for values of x greater than one, which is the region of interest. The sum over the roots is conditionally convergent, and should be taken in order of increasing absolute value of the imaginary part. Note that the same sum over the trivial roots gives the last subtrahend in the formula.
For Π0(x) we have a more complicated formula
Again, the formula is valid for x > 1, while ρ are the nontrivial zeros of the zeta function ordered according to their absolute value. The first term li(x) is the usual logarithmic integral function; the expression li(xρ) in the second term should be considered as Ei(ρ log x), where Ei is the analytic continuation of the exponential integral function from negative reals to the complex plane with branch cut along the positive reals. The final integral is equal to the series over the trivial zeros:
Thus, Möbius inversion formula gives us [10]
valid for x > 1, where
is Riemann's R-function [24] and μ(n) is the Möbius function. The latter series for it is known as Gram series. [25] [26] Because log x < x for all x > 0, this series converges for all positive x by comparison with the series for ex. The logarithm in the Gram series of the sum over the non-trivial zero contribution should be evaluated as ρ log x and not log xρ.
Folkmar Bornemann proved, [27] when assuming the conjecture that all zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple, [note 1] that
where ρ runs over the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function and t > 0.
The sum over non-trivial zeta zeros in the formula for π0(x) describes the fluctuations of π0(x) while the remaining terms give the "smooth" part of prime-counting function, [28] so one can use
as a good estimator of π(x) for x > 1. In fact, since the second term approaches 0 as x → ∞, while the amplitude of the "noisy" part is heuristically about √x/log x, estimating π(x) by R(x) alone is just as good, and fluctuations of the distribution of primes may be clearly represented with the function
Ramanujan [29] proved that the inequality
holds for all sufficiently large values of x.
Here are some useful inequalities for π(x).
The left inequality holds for x ≥ 17 and the right inequality holds for x > 1. The constant 1.25506 is 30log 113/113 to 5 decimal places, as π(x) log x/x has its maximum value at x = p30 = 113. [30]
Pierre Dusart proved in 2010: [31]
More recently, Dusart has proved [32] (Theorem 5.1) that
for x ≥ 88789 and x > 1, respectively.
Going in the other direction, an approximation for the nth prime, pn, is
Here are some inequalities for the nth prime. The lower bound is due to Dusart (1999) [33] and the upper bound to Rosser (1941). [34]
The left inequality holds for n ≥ 2 and the right inequality holds for n ≥ 6. A variant form sometimes seen substitutes An even simpler lower bound is [35]
which holds for all n ≥ 1, but the lower bound above is tighter for n > ee≈15.154.
In 2010 Dusart proved [31] (Propositions 6.7 and 6.6) that
for n ≥ 3 and n ≥ 688383, respectively.
In 2024, Axler [36] further tightened this (equations 1.12 and 1.13) using bounds of the form
proving that
for n ≥ 2 and n ≥ 3468, respectively. The lower bound may also be simplified to f(n, w2) without altering its validity. The upper bound may be tightened to f(n, w2 − 6w + 10.667) if n ≥ 46254381.
There are additional bounds of varying complexity. [37] [38] [39]
The Riemann hypothesis implies a much tighter bound on the error in the estimate for π(x), and hence to a more regular distribution of prime numbers,
Specifically, [40]
Dudek (2015) proved that the Riemann hypothesis implies that for all x ≥ 2 there is a prime p satisfying
In mathematics, the prime number theorem (PNT) describes the asymptotic distribution of the prime numbers among the positive integers. It formalizes the intuitive idea that primes become less common as they become larger by precisely quantifying the rate at which this occurs. The theorem was proved independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin in 1896 using ideas introduced by Bernhard Riemann.
The Riemann zeta function or Euler–Riemann zeta function, denoted by the Greek letter ζ (zeta), is a mathematical function of a complex variable defined as for , and its analytic continuation elsewhere.
In mathematics, the logarithmic integral function or integral logarithm li(x) is a special function. It is relevant in problems of physics and has number theoretic significance. In particular, according to the prime number theorem, it is a very good approximation to the prime-counting function, which is defined as the number of prime numbers less than or equal to a given value .
The Liouville lambda function, denoted by λ(n) and named after Joseph Liouville, is an important arithmetic function. Its value is +1 if n is the product of an even number of prime numbers, and −1 if it is the product of an odd number of primes.
In probability theory and statistics, the zeta distribution is a discrete probability distribution. If X is a zeta-distributed random variable with parameter s, then the probability that X takes the positive integer value k is given by the probability mass function
Euler's constant is a mathematical constant, usually denoted by the lowercase Greek letter gamma, defined as the limiting difference between the harmonic series and the natural logarithm, denoted here by log:
In mathematics, the n-th harmonic number is the sum of the reciprocals of the first n natural numbers:
In mathematics, the Clausen function, introduced by Thomas Clausen, is a transcendental, special function of a single variable. It can variously be expressed in the form of a definite integral, a trigonometric series, and various other forms. It is intimately connected with the polylogarithm, inverse tangent integral, polygamma function, Riemann zeta function, Dirichlet eta function, and Dirichlet beta function.
In mathematics, the Hurwitz zeta function is one of the many zeta functions. It is formally defined for complex variables s with Re(s) > 1 and a ≠ 0, −1, −2, … by
In number theory, the Mertens function is defined for all positive integers n as
In mathematics, the polylogarithm (also known as Jonquière's function, for Alfred Jonquière) is a special function Lis(z) of order s and argument z. Only for special values of s does the polylogarithm reduce to an elementary function such as the natural logarithm or a rational function. In quantum statistics, the polylogarithm function appears as the closed form of integrals of the Fermi–Dirac distribution and the Bose–Einstein distribution, and is also known as the Fermi–Dirac integral or the Bose–Einstein integral. In quantum electrodynamics, polylogarithms of positive integer order arise in the calculation of processes represented by higher-order Feynman diagrams.
In mathematics, the von Mangoldt function is an arithmetic function named after German mathematician Hans von Mangoldt. It is an example of an important arithmetic function that is neither multiplicative nor additive.
In mathematics, the explicit formulae for L-functions are relations between sums over the complex number zeroes of an L-function and sums over prime powers, introduced by Riemann (1859) for the Riemann zeta function. Such explicit formulae have been applied also to questions on bounding the discriminant of an algebraic number field, and the conductor of a number field.
In mathematics, the Riemann zeta function is a function in complex analysis, which is also important in number theory. It is often denoted and is named after the mathematician Bernhard Riemann. When the argument is a real number greater than one, the zeta function satisfies the equation It can therefore provide the sum of various convergent infinite series, such as Explicit or numerically efficient formulae exist for at integer arguments, all of which have real values, including this example. This article lists these formulae, together with tables of values. It also includes derivatives and some series composed of the zeta function at integer arguments.
In number theory, Li's criterion is a particular statement about the positivity of a certain sequence that is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis. The criterion is named after Xian-Jin Li, who presented it in 1997. In 1999, Enrico Bombieri and Jeffrey C. Lagarias provided a generalization, showing that Li's positivity condition applies to any collection of points that lie on the Re(s) = 1/2 axis.
In mathematics, the Riemann xi function is a variant of the Riemann zeta function, and is defined so as to have a particularly simple functional equation. The function is named in honour of Bernhard Riemann.
In mathematics, the Chebyshev function is either a scalarising function (Tchebycheff function) or one of two related functions. The first Chebyshev functionϑ (x) or θ (x) is given by
In mathematics, the Riesz mean is a certain mean of the terms in a series. They were introduced by Marcel Riesz in 1911 as an improvement over the Cesàro mean. The Riesz mean should not be confused with the Bochner–Riesz mean or the Strong–Riesz mean.
In mathematics, the multiplication theorem is a certain type of identity obeyed by many special functions related to the gamma function. For the explicit case of the gamma function, the identity is a product of values; thus the name. The various relations all stem from the same underlying principle; that is, the relation for one special function can be derived from that for the others, and is simply a manifestation of the same identity in different guises.
In mathematics, the Riemann hypothesis is the conjecture that the Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part 1/2. Many consider it to be the most important unsolved problem in pure mathematics. It is of great interest in number theory because it implies results about the distribution of prime numbers. It was proposed by Bernhard Riemann, after whom it is named.