Priya Satia

Last updated

Priya Satia is an American historian of the British Empire, with a particular focus in the Middle East and South Asia. [1] Satia is the Raymond A. Spruance Professor of International History at Stanford University. [2] She was educated at Stanford (attaining both a B.A. in international relations and a B.S. in chemistry) and the London School of Economics (receiving a master's degree in Development Economics) and received her PhD from the University of California, Berkeley in 2004. [1] [3] Satia grew up in Los Gatos, California. [3]

Contents

In addition to her academic publications, Satia has written for Time Magazine, [4] The Nation, [5] Slate, [6] The New Republic [7] and Foreign Policy Magazine. [8] She has also contributed opinion pieces for CNN online [9] as well as for the Washington Post [10] and Al Jazeera. [11]

She is on the international advisory board of Modern British History, an academic journal. [12]

Themes

Satia's research focuses on how the material and intellectual foundations of the modern world were shaped by the era of British imperialism. She investigates the development of government bodies, military advancements, ideas about progress, and the resulting anti-colonial movements to understand how British imperialism continues to influence the present day and how the moral challenges it raised were addressed historically. More recently, Satia has also explored whether concepts of selfhood and individual agency, inherited from 'Western' ideals of classical liberalism and the Age of Enlightenment, are helpful or hurtful in understanding the impact of colonization on former colonized societies.

Time's Monster: How History Makes History

Her book "Time's Monster" examines how the discipline of history itself enabled and justified British colonialism by promoting a linear vision of historical progress, derived from the ideas of the Enlightenment in Europe. She further examines how the idea of inevitable progress, enabled British imperialists to justify what she deems morally reprehensible colonial actions by suspending ethical judgment and prioritizing future outcomes above all else. This sensibility was not limited to the British liberalism of the time but permeated British thought in general, serving as a flexible tool to rationalize contradictory actions across different imperial contexts. This work bridges the gap between public debates on the legacy of the British Empire and academic discussions on Liberalism's complicity in imperialism. The book raises questions about the limitations and alternatives to this historical sensibility, prompting further inquiry into the complex relationship between historical thought and imperial actions. [13] [14]

Empire of Guns: The Violent Making of the Industrial Revolution

Empire of Guns argues that war, specifically the government's demand for military equipment, drove the Industrial Revolution in Britain. This is contrary to other theories that attribute the revolution to factors like coal supplies, inventiveness, or consumerism. Satia supports her argument by examining the Birmingham gun-making industry, showing how war benefited businesses and how guns played a crucial role in British cultural and colonial expansion. Guns were not only weapons, but also status symbols, gifts, currency, and signifiers of power.

However, the book also highlights the moral complexities of the gun trade, particularly for Samuel Galton, a Quaker gunmaker who faced criticism from his pacifist community. Satia uses this conflict to illustrate the clash between militarism and emerging ideas about guns in civic life. [15]

Essay on Significance of Kamala Harris as Vice Presidential candidate (2020)

In a 2020 Washington Post article, Satia analyzes the impact of representation in politics, focusing on Kamala Harris as a case study. She argues that, while representation alone doesn't guarantee radical change, it can embolden marginalized communities and create a context in which change becomes possible. Satia further highlights the disappointment of some on the left with Harris's moderate stance, drawing parallels to similar criticisms of Obama's presidency. The article counters the pessimistic view that these figures are mere tokens, arguing that representation, especially within a Democratic party reliant on minority support, matters significantly. The article then cites the Black Lives Matter movement as an example of how representation can catalyze activism, even if it arises from disillusionment. It further explores the historical context of anti-colonial struggles, emphasizing that radical change is often driven by ordinary people, but that representation can inspire and legitimize such movements. [10]

Essay on the American Natural History Museum (2024)

In a June 2024 essay published in Indian online paper ThePrint, Satia argues that the "Hall of Asian Peoples" in the American Museum of Natural History in New York is problematic because it portrays Asian cultures as static and frozen in time, often relying on outdated, harmful and racist stereotypes. One of the examples Satia mentions is the specific way Indian society is presented in an exhibit titled 'Indian Cycle of Life' because it "...suggests India is an exclusively Hindu society, with a single, heteronormative vision of life". Another example of a statement made in another exhibit about Arab culture that Satia deems problematic is that “Islamic civilization arose primarily out of Arab respect for Greek and Roman accomplishments.” [16] Satia believes the various misrepresentations can lead to misunderstandings and perpetuate harmful biases against Asian people and suggests that the museum needs to update its exhibits to reflect the dynamism and diversity of Asian and Middle Eastern cultures, and to do so in a way that is accurate. [16]

Her essay was criticized by Samuel Abrams, who serves as a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute, Faculty Fellow at NYU's Center for Advanced Social Science Research and as a professor of Politics at Sarah Lawrence College. [17] Abrams states that "Critiquing an outdated museum is fine, but nothing about Satia’s thread was constructive or helpful. Satia is a powerful voice as a tenured Stanford professor; she has expertise that would be of value to the museum. Rather than put her expertise to good use, Satia only presented the self-righteous rage that is common among so many professors." [18]

Reception of work

Time's Monster

In an article titled "The book that changed me: how Priya Satia’s Time’s Monster landed like a bomb in my historian’s brain," historian Mark LeVine discusses the impact of Priya Satia's book on his understanding of history's role in justifying and normalizing violence. LeVine highlights Satia's exploration of how 18th- and 19th-century British historians used their craft to rationalize imperial expansion, creating a historical narrative that obscured what he sees as the violence and exploitation inherent in colonialism. The article emphasizes and reiterates Satia's call for historians to confront their discipline's complicity in perpetuating injustice, urging a reckoning with the ethical implications of historical narratives. [19]

Writing in the Financial Times, Tony Barber states that "Satia’s book raises an important question about whether historians are prosecutors and history is a court in which judgments should be passed on accused individuals." [20]

Maya Jasanoff of the New Yorker praised Satia for the book's probing analysis of how British historians have shaped, and often distorted, the nation's view of its imperial past. Jasanoff finds Satia's arguments compelling, particularly her focus on the role of historians like James Mill in perpetuating the idea that imperialism brought progress to colonized lands. The book is also commended for highlighting the erasure of historical records by British officials, further obscuring the true nature of imperial rule. [21]

A more critical review came from author Zareer Masani. He criticizes Satia for conflating history, historiography, and historicism stating that "Most of Satia’s charge-sheet uses these terms as though they are interchangeable", and for relying on selective evidence, and making generalizations. The review finds fault with Satia's alleged moral equivalence between British imperialism and Nazism, as well as her misrepresentation of Indian history by overlooking positive contributions of British colonialism and internal conflicts within Indian society. Masani believes one example of this is when "..[Satia] castigates British Orientalists for perpetuating notions of Oriental despotism, but ignores the work of Orientalists like Sir William Jones and James Prinsep in rediscovering and celebrating India’s classical heritage." [22] Additionally, Satia's own argument is seen as potentially teleological, presenting a predetermined narrative of evil empire as the inevitable outcome of liberal imperialism. Overall, while the book raises important questions about the role of historians in shaping narratives, the review finds its approach to be flawed and misleading due to its selective evidence, generalizations, and biases. [22]

Empire of Guns

Writing in The New York Times, Jonathan Knee commends Satia for effectively challenging the traditional view of war as an economic hindrance. By presenting extensive evidence of the deep connections between war, government intervention, and industrial development, Satia offers a fresh perspective on the Industrial Revolution. The review also underscores Satia's emphasis on the crucial role of collaboration between the government and the private sector in fostering innovation and economic growth during the Industrial Revolution. Knee believes Satia's argument convincingly shows how public-private sector collaboration was a contradiction of "simple free-market narratives". [23] This partnership, particularly in the arms industry, led to significant advancements in various British economic sectors, from finance to mining. Knee also praises Satia's examination of the evolving social and moral implications of guns. Through the case of Samuel Galton Jr., a Quaker gunmaker, Satia reveals the changing attitudes towards guns as their technology and societal impact shifted over time.

While this book provides valuable insights into the role of guns, violence, and empire in British history, its argument that war caused the Industrial Revolution is considered problematic by a reviewer in The Guardian, historian Emma Griffin. Griffin states that industrialization is a complex phenomenon with diverse causes, and other countries, like Switzerland, industrialized without war. Therefore, while war may have played a significant role, Griffin takes issue with Satia's overall thesis that it is the main cause of the Industrial Revolution. [15]

Awards

Publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperialism</span> Extension of rule over foreign nations

Imperialism is maintaining or extending power over foreign nations, particularly through expansionism, employing both hard power and soft power. Imperialism focuses on establishing or maintaining hegemony and a more or less formal empire. While related to the concepts of colonialism, imperialism is a distinct concept that can apply to other forms of expansion and many forms of government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Imperialism</span> Colonial expansion in late 19th and early 20th centuries

In historical contexts, New Imperialism characterizes a period of colonial expansion by European powers, the United States, and Japan during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The period featured an unprecedented pursuit of overseas territorial acquisitions. At the time, states focused on building their empires with new technological advances and developments, expanding their territory through conquest, and exploiting the resources of the subjugated countries. During the era of New Imperialism, the European powers individually conquered almost all of Africa and parts of Asia. The new wave of imperialism reflected ongoing rivalries among the great powers, the economic desire for new resources and markets, and a "civilizing mission" ethos. Many of the colonies established during this era gained independence during the era of decolonization that followed World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American imperialism</span> Expansion of American political, economic, cultural, media, and military influence

American imperialism is the expansion of American political, economic, cultural, media, and military influence beyond the boundaries of the United States of America. Depending on the commentator, it may include imperialism through outright military conquest; military protection; gunboat diplomacy; unequal treaties; subsidization of preferred factions; regime change; economic or diplomatic support; or economic penetration through private companies, potentially followed by diplomatic or forceful intervention when those interests are threatened.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrence H. Gipson</span> American historian

Lawrence Henry Gipson was an American historian, who won the 1950 Bancroft Prize and the 1962 Pulitzer Prize for History for volumes of his magnum opus, the fifteen-volume history of "The British Empire Before the American Revolution", published 1936–70. He was a leader of the "Imperial school" of historians who studied the British Empire from the perspective of London, and generally praised the administrative efficiency and political fairness of the Empire.

Caroline Elkins is Professor of History and African and African American Studies at Harvard University, the Thomas Henry Carroll/Ford Foundation Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, Affiliated Professor at Harvard Law School, and the Founding Oppenheimer Faculty Director of Harvard's Center for African Studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of colonialism</span>

The historical phenomenon of colonization is one that stretches around the globe and across time. Ancient and medieval colonialism was practiced by the Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Turks, Han Chinese, and Arabs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A. G. Hopkins</span> British historian (born 1938)

Antony Gerald Hopkins, is a British historian specialising in the economic history of Africa, European colonialism, and globalisation. He is Emeritus Smuts Professor of Commonwealth History at the University of Cambridge, an Emeritus Fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge and a fellow of the British Academy.

The Herbert Baxter Adams Prize is an annual book prize of the American Historical Association. It is awarded for "a distinguished first book by a young scholar in the field of European history", and is named in honor of Herbert Baxter Adams, who was from the faculty of Johns Hopkins University and one of the founders of the AHA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historiography of the British Empire</span> Studies and methods used by scholars to develop a history of Britains empire

The historiography of the British Empire refers to the studies, sources, critical methods and interpretations used by scholars to develop a history of the British Empire. Historians and their ideas are the main focus here; specific lands and historical dates and episodes are covered in the article on the British Empire. Scholars have long studied the Empire, looking at the causes for its formation, its relations to the French and other empires, and the kinds of people who became imperialists or anti-imperialists, together with their mindsets. The history of the breakdown of the Empire has attracted scholars of the histories of the United States, the British Raj, and the African colonies. John Darwin (2013) identifies four imperial goals: colonising, civilising, converting, and commerce.

William Roger Louis CBE FBA, commonly known as Wm. Roger Louis or, informally, Roger Louis, is an American historian and a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Louis is the editor-in-chief of The Oxford History of the British Empire, a former president of the American Historical Association (AHA), a former chairman of the U.S. Department of State's Historical Advisory Committee, and a founding director of the AHA's National History Center in Washington, D. C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerald Horne</span> American historian (born 1949)

Gerald Horne is an American historian who holds the John J. and Rebecca Moores Chair of History and African American Studies at the University of Houston.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maya Jasanoff</span> American academic

Maya R. Jasanoff is an American academic who serves as Coolidge Professor of History at Harvard University, where she focuses on the history of Britain and the British Empire.

<i>Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism</i> 1917 book by Vladimir Lenin

Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, originally published as Imperialism, the Newest Stage of Capitalism, is a book written by Vladimir Lenin in 1916 and published in 1917. It describes the formation of oligopoly, by the interlacing of bank and industrial capital, in order to create a financial oligarchy, and explains the function of financial capital in generating profits from the exploitation colonialism inherent to imperialism, as the final stage of capitalism. The essay synthesises Lenin's developments of Karl Marx's theories of political economy in Das Kapital (1867).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-imperialism</span> Political stance in opposition to interventionist or expansionist policies

Anti-imperialism in political science and international relations is opposition to imperialism or neocolonialism. Anti-imperialist sentiment typically manifests as a political principle in independence struggles against intervention or influence from a global superpower, as well as in opposition to colonial rule. Anti-imperialism can also arise from a specific economic theory, such as in the Leninist interpretation of imperialism, which is derived from Lenin's 1917 work Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. People who categorize themselves as anti-imperialists often state that they are opposed to colonialism, colonial empires, hegemony, imperialism and the territorial expansion of a country beyond its established borders.

Faramerz Noshir Dabhoiwala is a historian and senior research scholar at Princeton University where he teaches and writes about the social history, cultural history, and intellectual history of the English-speaking world, from the Middle Ages to the present day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian imperialism</span>

Russian imperialism is the political, economic and cultural influence, as well as military power, exerted by Russia and its predecessor states, over other countries and territories. It includes the conquests of the Tsardom of Russia, the Russian Empire, the imperialism of the Soviet Union, and the neo-imperialism of the Russian Federation. Some postcolonial scholars have noted the lack of attention given to Russian and Soviet imperialism in the discipline.

<i>The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company</i> 2019 book by William Dalrymple

The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company is a 2019 history book by William Dalrymple. It recounts the rise of the East India Company in the second half of the 18th century, against the backdrop of a crumbling Mughal Empire and the rise of regional powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrekos Varnava</span> Writer and Cypriot history academic

Professor Andrekos Varnava,, is a dual national Cypriot–Australian writer and historian, who is best known for his work confronting controversial moments in modern history and their consequences.

John Parr was an English merchant and shipowner. He was bailiff and mayor of the Borough of Liverpool in 1773.

Legacy of Violence: A History of the British Empire is a 2022 nonfiction history book by American historian and professor Caroline Elkins. The book covers the history of the British Empire from the Great Bengal famine of 1770 through the post-World War II period of recurring end-of-empire insurgencies up until the present-day, including the Mau Mau High Court case and the ongoing imperial history wars. The book was short-listed for the 2022 Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction.

References

  1. 1 2 "Priya Satia". tec.fsi.stanford.edu. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  2. ↑ "Priya Satia". Stanford University. Archived from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  3. 1 2 "Priya Satia". Heyman Center. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  4. ↑ Satia, Priya (September 12, 2022). "The British Monarchy Helped Mortgage Our Collective Future". TIME. Retrieved September 18, 2024.
  5. ↑ "Priya Satia". The Nation. April 2, 2010. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  6. ↑ "Priya Satia". Slate Magazine. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  7. ↑ "Priya Satia". The New Republic. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  8. ↑ Satia, Priya (July 24, 2024). "Democracy Isn't Just About Voting". Foreign Policy. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  9. ↑ Satia, Priya (July 28, 2014). "How WWI gave us drones". CNN. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  10. 1 2 "Perspective | Kamala Harris is not a radical, but her rise may herald progressive change". Washington Post. October 9, 2020. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  11. ↑ Satia, Priya. "The myths of British imperial benevolence and Palestine". Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  12. ↑ "Editorial_Board". Oxford Academic. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  13. ↑ "Roundtable Panel—Priya Satia's Time's Monster: How History Makes History". Toynbee Prize Foundation. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  14. ↑ Malik, Kenan (October 26, 2020). "Time's Monster by Priya Satia review – living in the past". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  15. 1 2 Griffin, Emma (July 13, 2018). "Empire of Guns by Priya Satia – how war drove the industrial revolution". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved July 27, 2024.
  16. 1 2 Satia, Priya (June 29, 2024). "America, your Natural History museum has a problem. 'Hall of Asian Peoples' is a hall of shame". ThePrint. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  17. ↑ "Samuel Abrams". www.sarahlawrence.edu. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  18. ↑ Abrams, Samuel (June 11, 2024). "The Wrong Way to Help Improve a Museum". American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  19. ↑ Rees, Yves (June 21, 2022). "The book that changed me: how Priya Satia's Time's Monster landed like a bomb in my historian's brain". The Conversation. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  20. ↑ "Is it time to strike back at empire?". www.ft.com. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  21. ↑ Jasanoff, Maya (October 26, 2020). "Misremembering the British Empire". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X . Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  22. 1 2 "Priya Satia, Time's Monster: History, Conscience & Britain's Empire - History Reclaimed". August 12, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  23. ↑ Knee, Jonathan A. (April 9, 2018). "Review: 'Empire of Guns' Challenges the Role of War in Industrialization". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved July 27, 2024.
  24. 1 2 "Book Prize – Pacific Coast Conference on British Studies" . Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  25. ↑ NewStatesman (November 11, 2020). "Books of the year". New Statesman. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  26. ↑ "Jerry Bentley Prize – AHA". www.historians.org/. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  27. ↑ "Business Archives Council - Activities & Events ‹ BAC Wadsworth Prize". businessarchivescouncil.org.uk. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  28. ↑ "Herbert Baxter Adams Prize – AHA". www.historians.org/. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  29. ↑ Reviews of Spies in Arabia:
  30. ↑ Reviews of Empire of Guns:
  31. ↑ Reviews of Time's Monster:
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.