Prorogation in the United Kingdom

Last updated

In United Kingdom constitutional law, prorogation is an act usually used to mark the end of a parliamentary session. Part of the royal prerogative, it is the name given to the period between the end of a session of the UK Parliament and the State Opening of Parliament that begins the next session. The average length of prorogation since 2000 (i.e. calendar days between the date of a new session and prorogation of the previous Session) is approximately 18 days. [1] The parliamentary session may also be prorogued before Parliament is dissolved. The power to prorogue Parliament belongs to the monarch, on the advice of the Privy Council. [2] Like all prerogative powers, it is not left to the personal discretion of the monarch but is to be exercised, on the advice of the prime minister, according to law. [3]

Contents

Procedure and recall

Prorogation is the period between the end of a parliamentary session of Parliament and the beginning of a new session (which begins with the State Opening of Parliament). [4] By current practice, Parliament is prorogued by commissioners acting in the sovereign's name. Parliament is always prorogued to a definite day. Parliament, while prorogued, can be recalled by proclamation in accordance with the Meeting of Parliament Act 1797 and the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. [5] The parliamentary procedure for prorogation begins in the House of Lords, and is followed by a procedure in the House of Commons. [6]

Effect on pending legislation

Bills that have not been enacted (i.e., have not yet received royal assent) before prorogation are lost, unless agreed to be carried over. [7] [8] A "carry-over motion" may be tabled (i.e., introduced) by a government minister; the motion, if passed, allows the government bill to be carried over to the new session for a period of 12 months from its first reading in the Commons. [8] A bill may not be carried over twice. [8]

Notable prorogations

Prorogation is normally a standard procedure in the calendar of Parliament, but the prerogative has sometimes been used for controversial political objectives.

After Petition of Right (1628)

King Charles I prorogued the Parliament of England in 1628, after the Petition of Right; this development preceded the era of Charles' Personal Rule. [9]

Exclusion Crisis (1678)

King Charles II prorogued the Cavalier Parliament in December 1678 to prevent it continuing with the impeachment of the Earl of Danby. He dissolved Parliament that January and called a new Parliament, the Habeas Corpus Parliament, but prorogued it on 27 May 1679 to prevent it passing the Exclusion Bill (to exclude James II, then Duke of York from succeeding to the Crown of England). The next Parliament was summoned in July 1679, but did not meet until October 1680. Charles prorogued this on 10 January 1681 to prevent proceedings to impeach certain judges, dissolving it on 18 January and calling a new Parliament to meet at Oxford. This Oxford Parliament only met from 21 to 28 March 1681, when it too was dismissed by the king.

This and the actions of Charles I were one of the reasons for the Bill of Rights 1689, where article 1 stated that:

the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority without Consent of Parliament is illegal.

The Great Reform crisis (1831)

When the House of Commons defeated the First Reform Bill in 1831, the government urged the King to dissolve Parliament, which would lead to a new general election. William IV was initially reluctant, but he was irritated by the Opposition, which announced it would move the passage of an Address or resolution against dissolution. Regarding the Opposition's motion as an attack on his prerogative, and at the urgent request of the government, the King prepared to go in person to the House of Lords and prorogue Parliament. [10] Lord Wharncliffe had given notice of a resolution which was an Address to the monarch against a dissolution. [11]

The next day, 22 April 1831, the Prime Minister went to see the King in order to prevent these stratagems to frustrate the Reform being successful. They decided that, in order to prevent Wharncliffe's motion being carried, the monarch should prorogue the Houses in person, because were Commissioners sent to prorogue the Houses, it was the privilege of Parliament to keep them waiting until they had voted on any motion. However, if the monarch came in person, he could interrupt the debate and prorogue Parliament, so that Lord Wharncliffe's motion could not be passed. [12] When initially told that his horses could not be ready at such short notice, the King is supposed to have said, "Then I will go in a hackney cab!". [10]

At 2 p.m. that day the House of Lords assembled. Soon, over the uproar, cannons could be heard indicating the imminent arrival of the King. Crowds cheered the King's coach all the way from St. James's Palace. Hansard records there was a shout of "God save the King". At that moment, large doors were thrown open and the King, wearing his crown, entered the House of Lords. The members of the House of Commons, no less angry than the Lords, came into the chamber at the behest of Black Rod. The King then announced "My lords and gentlemen, I have come to meet you for the purpose of proroguing this Parliament". [12] Wharncliffe's motion was actually under discussion in the House of Lords when the King arrived to prorogue Parliament. Probably, both houses would have joined advancing Wharncliffe's motion had time been allowed them, and thus placed obstacles in the way. But by appealing to the people, ministers at once deprived their opponents of the vantage ground of parliamentary opposition. [11]

Clement Attlee's Lords reform (1948)

After the Second World War, the Labour government of Clement Attlee decided to amend the Parliament Act 1911 to reduce further the power of the Lords, as a result of their fears that their radical programme of nationalisation would be delayed by the Lords and hence would not be completed within the life of the parliament. [13] The House of Lords did not interfere with nationalisations in 1945 or 1946, but it was feared that the proposed nationalisation of the iron and steel industry would be a bridge too far, [14] so a bill was introduced in 1947 to reduce the time that the Lords could delay bills, from three sessions over two years to two sessions over one year. [15] The Lords attempted to block this change. The Bill was reintroduced in 1948 and again in 1949, before the 1911 Act was finally used to force it through. [16] Since the 1911 Act required a delay over three "sessions", a special short "session" of parliament was introduced in 1948, with a King's Speech on 14 September 1948, and prorogation on 25 October 1948. [15]

Cash-for-questions affair (1997)

In 1997, John Major, the then prime minister, and leader of the Conservative and Unionist Party, controversially prorogued parliament at a time that avoided parliamentary debate of the Parliamentary Commissioner's report on the cash-for-questions affair. [17] [18] On that occasion, the prorogation was on Friday, 21 March, [19] and was followed by a general election on 1 May, resulting in a change of government to Labour led by Tony Blair.

Annulled prorogation attempt (2019)

On 28 August 2019, Boris Johnson declared he had asked Queen Elizabeth II to prorogue parliament from between 9–12 September until the opening of a new session on 14 October. [20] Parliament was due to have a three-week recess for party conference season, [21] and if that were to take place as usual then Johnson's prorogation would add around four days to the parliamentary break. The 2017–19 parliamentary session was already the longest since the English Civil War, [22] [23] while the prorogation in 2019 at Johnson's request would have been the longest prorogation since 1930. [24]

The government stated that the prorogation was to allow for the government to set out a new legislative agenda. [20] Others questioned this justification, and said that the prorogation was an improper attempt to evade parliamentary scrutiny of Johnson's Brexit plans in advance of the UK's departure from the European Union on 31 October 2019; individuals and groups who opposed the prorogation included opposition MPs, [21] UK constitutional law scholars, [25] and Sir John Major, the former Conservative prime minister. [26] [27] The Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, called the decision a "constitutional outrage". [28]

Three separate cases were lodged before the courts alleging its illegality. The High Court of Justice in London found the issue to be non-justiciable, but the highest civil court in Scotland, the Court of Session sitting in Edinburgh, ruled prorogation was unlawful as it had the "improper purpose of stymieing Parliament". [29] [30] The issue was brought before the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 17 September 2019 in the cases R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland, heard jointly. [31] On 24 September, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the prorogation was both justiciable and unlawful, and therefore null and of no effect. [32] [33] [34] Parliament resumed sitting the following day, continuing the parliamentary session. [35] [36] Bercow said he would ensure that the attempted prorogation would be expunged from the House of Commons Journal, the corrected formal record of parliamentary business, and replaced with a statement that Parliament was adjourned for the period of the absence. [37] [38]

In December 2020 the Johnson Government published the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (Repeal) Bill which would stop courts from ruling on the power to dissolve parliament. [39] This was formally introduced as the "Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill" in 2021 and passed as the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "Lengths of Prorogation 1900–2017". UK Parliament.
  2. ↑ "Prorogation". UK Parliament.
  3. ↑ R Blackburn, 'Monarchy and the personal prerogatives' [2004] Public Law 546, explaining that the "personal prerogative" of the monarch is a set of powers that must be exercised according to law, and must follow the advice of the prime minister, or in accordance with Parliament and the courts.
  4. ↑ "Parliament prorogued ahead of State Opening". UK Parliament. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
  5. ↑ Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords.
  6. ↑ Prorogation at end of the 2016–17 parliamentary session, 27 April 2017
  7. ↑ "Prorogation". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 "Carrying bills over to another session". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  9. ↑ Kevin Sharpe, The Personal Rule of Charles I (Yale University Press: 1992: 1995 paperback ed.), p. 43.
  10. 1 2 Ziegler, Philip (1971). King William IV. London: Collins. ISBN   978-0-00-211934-4; pp. 182–190. [Read on Archive.org]
  11. 1 2 May, Thomas Erskine (1862) The constitutional history of England since the accession of George the Third, 1760–1860, Boston, MA: Crosby & Nichols; Vol 1, pp. 121–122
  12. 1 2 Trevelyan, George Macaulay (1920) Lord Grey of the Reform Bill, London: Longmans, Green & Co.; pp. 294–296
  13. ↑ "House of Lords Hansard for 19 January 2001 (pt 1)". The Stationery Office. 19 January 2001. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 9 October 2006.
  14. ↑ "The Parliament Act 1949" (PDF). (103 KB), House of Lords Library Note LLN 2005/007, 16 November 2005.
  15. 1 2 "Parliamentary Standard Note on the Parliament Acts" (PDF). (235 KB) (SN/PC/00675) (last updated 24 February 2014, in PDF format, 29 pages)
  16. ↑ R. v. H.M. Attorney General, ex parte Jackson [2005] EWHC 94 (Admin), 28 January 2005
  17. ↑ Kate Devlin (10 July 2019). "No-deal Brexit: Sir John Major will fight Boris Johnson in court if he tries to suspend parliament". The Times.
  18. ↑ David Hencke (19 March 1997). "Fury as sleaze report buried". The Guardian.
  19. ↑ Lord Mackay of Clashfern, The Lord Chancellor (21 March 1997). "Prorogation: Her Majesty's Speech". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Lords. col. 1182–1185.
  20. 1 2 Jennifer Hassan. "Read Boris Johnson's letter to British lawmakers about his plans to shut down Parliament". The Washington Post . Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  21. 1 2 "What is prorogation and why is Boris Johnson using it?". The Guardian , 28 August 2019.
  22. ↑ "Is this the longest parliamentary session ever?". House of Commons Library. 10 May 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  23. ↑ McDonald, Karl (13 May 2019). "Brexit struggles lead to longest parliamentary session since the Civil War". i News . Retrieved 28 August 2019.
  24. ↑ Meg Russell (1 September 2019). "Westminster shutdown:is Britain facing a coup?". The Guardian .
  25. ↑ "Letters: The 'improper' nature of this prorogation". Times of London. 3 September 2019.
  26. ↑ Owen Bowcott (19 September 2019). "John Major's lawyer attacks No 10 prorogation claims as 'misleading'". The Guardian.
  27. ↑ Tony Diver (24 September 2019). "Boris Johnson should apologise to Parliament for prorogation, says Sir John Major". The Telegraph.
  28. ↑ Lee, Georgina (28 August 2019). "Parliament 'prorogation' explained". Channel 4. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
  29. ↑ Young, A. (13 September 2019). "Prorogation, Politics and the Principle of Legality". U.K. Constitutional Law Blog.
  30. ↑ McGaughey, E. (14 September 2019). "Is There a 'Legal Measure' to Judge Parliament's Prorogration?". U.K. Constitutional Law Blog.
  31. ↑ "Scottish judges rule Parliament suspension is unlawful". BBC News. 11 September 2019.
  32. ↑ Bowcott, Owen (24 September 2019). "Boris Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
  33. ↑ "Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges rule". BBC News . London. 24 September 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
  34. ↑ R (Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) and Cherry & Ors (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland), [2019] UKSC 41 (24 September 2019).
  35. ↑ "Parliament: MPs and peers return after court rules suspension unlawful". BBC News . 25 September 2019.
  36. ↑ "Prorogation ceremony 9 September 2019". UK Parliament. 24 September 2019.
  37. ↑ Britton, Bianca (25 September 2019). "Lawmakers return to Parliament after court rules against Boris Johnson's prorogation". CNN.
  38. ↑ Smyth, Chris; Swinford, Steven (26 September 2019). "Supreme Court ruling: This parliament is dead, says law chief Geoffrey Cox". The Times.
  39. ↑ "Johnson publishes plans to regain power from courts and MPs". The Guardian. 1 December 2020.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of the United Kingdom</span> Legislative body in the United Kingdom

The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the supreme legislative body of the United Kingdom, and may also legislate for the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories. It meets at the Palace of Westminster in London. Parliament possesses legislative supremacy and thereby holds ultimate power over all other political bodies in the United Kingdom and the Overseas Territories. While Parliament is bicameral, it has three parts, consisting of the sovereign (King-in-Parliament), the House of Lords, and the House of Commons. In theory, power is officially vested in the King-in-Parliament. However, the Crown normally acts on the advice of the prime minister, and the powers of the House of Lords are limited to only delaying legislation; thus power is de facto vested in the House of Commons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of Rights 1689</span> English civil rights legislation

The Bill of Rights 1689 is an Act of the Parliament of England that set out certain basic civil rights and clarified who would be next to inherit the Crown. It remains a crucial statute in English constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal assent</span> Formal approval of a proposed law in monarchies

Royal assent is the method by which a monarch formally approves an act of the legislature, either directly or through an official acting on the monarch's behalf. In some jurisdictions, royal assent is equivalent to promulgation, while in others that is a separate step. Under a modern constitutional monarchy, royal assent is considered little more than a formality. Even in nations such as the United Kingdom, Norway, the Netherlands, Liechtenstein and Monaco which still, in theory, permit their monarch to withhold assent to laws, the monarch almost never does so, except in a dire political emergency or on advice of government. While the power to veto by withholding royal assent was once exercised often by European monarchs, such an occurrence has been very rare since the eighteenth century.

Prorogation in the Westminster system of government is the action of proroguing, or interrupting, a parliament, or the discontinuance of meetings for a given period of time, without a dissolution of parliament. The term is also used for the period of such a discontinuance between two legislative sessions of a legislative body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claim of Right 1689</span> Kingdom of Scotland legislation

The Claim of Right is an Act passed by the Convention of the Estates, a sister body to the Parliament of Scotland, in April 1689. It is one of the key documents of United Kingdom constitutional law and Scottish constitutional law.

A legislative session is the period of time in which a legislature, in both parliamentary and presidential systems, is convened for purpose of lawmaking, usually being one of two or more smaller divisions of the entire time between two elections. In each country the procedures for opening, ending, and in between sessions differs slightly. A session may last for the full term of the legislature or the term may consist of a number of sessions. These may be of fixed duration, such as a year, or may be used as a parliamentary procedural device. A session of the legislature is brought to an end by an official act of prorogation. In either event, the effect of prorogation is generally the clearing of all outstanding matters before the legislature.

In the UK and certain other Commonwealth countries, King's Consent is a parliamentary convention under which Crown consent is sought whenever a proposed parliamentary bill will affect the Crown's own prerogatives or interests. Prince's Consent is a similar doctrine, under which consent of the Prince of Wales must be obtained for matters relating to the Duchy of Cornwall. King's or Prince's Consent must be obtained early in the legislative process, generally before parliament may debate or vote on a bill. In modern times, following the tenets of constitutional monarchy, consent is granted or withheld as advised by government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom</span> Privileges and immunities of the British monarch

The royal prerogative is a body of customary authority, privilege, and immunity attached to the British monarch, recognised in the United Kingdom. The monarch is regarded internally as the absolute authority, or "sole prerogative", and the source of many of the executive powers of the British government.

Prorogation is the end of a parliamentary session in the Parliament of Canada and the parliaments of its provinces and territories. It differs from a recess or adjournment, which do not end a session; and differs from a complete dissolution of parliament, which ends both the session and the entire parliament, requiring an election for the House of Commons in the bicameral federal parliament and the singular legislative chamber of the unicameral provincial parliaments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (FTPA) was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which, for the first time, set in legislation a default fixed election date for general elections in the United Kingdom. It remained in force until 2022, when it was repealed. Since then, as before its passage, elections are required by law to be held at least once every five years, but can be called earlier if the prime minister advises the monarch to exercise the royal prerogative to do so. Prime ministers have often employed this mechanism to call an election before the end of their five-year term, sometimes fairly early in it. Critics have said this gives an unfair advantage to the incumbent prime minister, allowing them to call a general election at a time that suits them electorially. While it was in force, the FTPA removed this longstanding power of the prime minister.

A recall of Parliament is a parliamentary procedure involving an extraordinary sitting of a parliament, occurring outside the time when that parliament would usually meet, such as over a weekend, or when the parliament would normally be in recess. A parliament is generally recalled as a result of events of major national importance, thus allowing members to hold an emergency debate on issues relating to those events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impeachment in the United Kingdom</span> Ancient English/UK parliamentary procedure

Impeachment is a process in which the Parliament of the United Kingdom may prosecute and try individuals, normally holders of public office, for high treason or other crimes and misdemeanours. First used to try William Latimer, 4th Baron Latimer during the English Good Parliament of 1376, it was a rare mechanism whereby Parliament was able to arrest and depose ministers of the Crown. The last impeachment was that of Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville in 1806; since then, other forms of democratic scrutiny have been favoured and the process has been considered as an obsolete—but still extant—power of Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018</span> United Kingdom legislation

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that provides both for repeal of the European Communities Act 1972, and for parliamentary approval to be required for any withdrawal agreement negotiated between the Government of the United Kingdom and the European Union. The bill's passage through both Houses of Parliament was completed on 20 June 2018 and it became law by Royal Assent on 26 June.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Northern Ireland Act 2019, colloquially known as the 2019 Northern Ireland Act, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that provided for the extension of the period for forming a Northern Ireland executive until 13 January 2020. The Act also extended the powers of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland during this time whilst imposing several conditions. The Act requires that the Secretary of State report regularly to Parliament, designed to limit the ability of the sovereign to prorogue parliament, as well as providing for the legalisation of same-sex marriage and opposite-sex civil partnership in Northern Ireland and the liberalisation of abortion laws if no executive was formed by midnight on 21 October 2019. After the deadline passed, abortion was decriminalised automatically by repeal of Sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861; in December 2019 the British Government passed regulations legalising same-sex marriage and opposite-sex civil partnerships on 13 January 2020. Further regulations governing abortion came into force on 31 March 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019</span> United Kingdom legislation

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019, informally referred to as the Benn Act, was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that required the Prime Minister of the UK to seek an extension to the Brexit withdrawal date—then scheduled for 31 October 2019—in certain circumstances. The main provisions of the Act were triggered if the House of Commons did not give its consent to either a withdrawal agreement or leaving without a deal by 19 October 2019. The Act proposed a new withdrawal date of 31 January 2020, which the Prime Minister accepted if the proposal was accepted by the European Council.

On 28 August 2019, the Parliament of the United Kingdom was ordered to be prorogued by Queen Elizabeth II on the advice of the Conservative prime minister, Boris Johnson – this advice was later ruled unlawful. The prorogation, or suspension, of Parliament was to be effective from some point between 9 and 12 September 2019 and would last until the State Opening of Parliament on 14 October 2019. As a consequence, Parliament was suspended between 10 September and 24 September 2019. Since Parliament was to be prorogued for five weeks and reconvene just 17 days before the United Kingdom's scheduled departure from the European Union on 31 October 2019, the move was seen by many opposition politicians and political commentators as a controversial and unconstitutional attempt by the prime minister to avoid parliamentary scrutiny of the Government's Brexit plans in the final weeks leading up to Brexit. Johnson and his Government defended the prorogation of Parliament as a routine political process that ordinarily follows the selection of a new prime minister and would allow the Government to refocus on a legislative agenda.

<i>R (Miller) v The Prime Minister</i> and <i>Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland</i> 2019 UK Supreme Court constitutional law cases

R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland, also known as Miller II and Miller/Cherry, were joint landmark constitutional law cases on the limits of the power of royal prerogative to prorogue the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Argued before the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in September 2019, the case concerned whether the advice given by the prime minister, Boris Johnson, to Queen Elizabeth II that Parliament should be prorogued in the prelude to the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union was lawful.

2010s political history refers to significant political and societal historical events in the United Kingdom in the 2010s, presented as a historical overview in narrative format.

The powers of the prime minister of the United Kingdom come from several sources of the UK constitution, including both statute and constitutional convention, but not one single authoritative document. They have been described as "...problematic to outline definitively."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022</span> UK constitutional legislation

The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that repealed the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 and reinstated the prior constitutional situation, by reviving the prerogative powers of the monarch to dissolve and summon parliament. As the monarch exercises this power at the request of the prime minister, this restored the power of the prime minister to have a general election called at a time of their choosing.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.