Remain in Mexico

Last updated

Remain in Mexico (officially Migrant Protection Protocols) is a United States immigration policy originally implemented in January 2019 under the administration of President Donald Trump, affecting immigration across the border with Mexico. Administered by the Department of Homeland Security, it requires migrants seeking asylum to remain in Mexico until their US immigration court date.

Contents

The policy was initially ended by the Biden administration, and after some legal battles, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on June 30, 2022, in Biden v. Texas , that the administration had the authority to end the policy. In December 2022, however, a federal judge blocked the Biden administration from ending the program. Remain in Mexico has been widely criticized by human rights organizations for exposing migrants to attacks while they awaited processing. [1] [2] [3]

Background

Migrants at the Kino Border Initiative in Nogales, Sonora in 2020. Kino Border Initiative - Jan 2020 02.jpg
Migrants at the Kino Border Initiative in Nogales, Sonora in 2020.

In June 2018, the Department of Justice implemented a policy to deny that lack of protection from gender-based violence or gang violence were lawful bases for claiming asylum, overturning a 2016 Board of Immigration Appeals precedent. [4] In his opinion, Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote, "Generally, claims by aliens pertaining to domestic violence or gang violence perpetrated by nongovernmental actors will not qualify for asylum." [4] In December 2018, federal judge Emmet G. Sullivan overturned the limitation on asylum as inconsistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act. [5] Human Rights Watch reported that the program "is expelling asylum seekers to ill-prepared, dangerous Mexican border cities where they face high if not insurmountable barriers to receiving due process on their asylum claims." [6] The policy is under review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court has permitted it to continue during the review. [7]

On November 9, 2018, then-U.S. president Donald Trump issued a proclamation suspending the right of asylum to any migrant crossing the US–Mexico border outside of a lawful port of entry. [8] U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar of the Northern California District Court issued a November 19 injunction against implementing the policy, which was upheld by the US Supreme Court on December 21, 2018. [9] In a separate case, Judge Randolph Moss of the DC District Court ruled in August 2019 to vacate the Interim Final Rule establishing the asylum ban for violating the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that a migrant may apply for asylum "whether or not at a designated port of arrival", as previously argued by the Supreme Court. [10] [11]

Announcement and implementation (2019–2021)

On December 20, 2018, the Department of Homeland Security announced the Migrant Protection Protocols, colloquially known as the "Remain in Mexico" program, a policy allowing the government to release migrants with asylum claims to Mexico to await their asylum hearings in the United States. It implemented the program with a policy memo released on January 25, 2019. The program was first rolled out at the San Ysidro, California, port of entry bordering Tijuana, Baja California. It was subsequently implemented in Calexico-Mexicali, El Paso-Ciudad Juarez, Brownsville-Matamoros, Laredo-Nuevo Laredo, Eagle Pass-Piedras Negras, and Nogales-Nogales. [12] According to DHS, "Aliens whose claims are found meritorious by an immigration judge will be allowed to remain in the U.S. Those determined to be without valid claims will be removed from the U.S. to their country of nationality or citizenship." [13] By June 2019, over 12,000 migrants had been returned to Mexico under the policy. [7] By September 2019, 47,000 people had been returned; [14] and 57,000 by December 2019. [15] Human Rights First found that at least 636 of those returned suffered violent crimes in Mexico, including kidnapping, rape, torture, and assault. [15] As of September 2019, fewer than ten thousand migrants in the program had their cases reviewed: 11 had been granted asylum; 5,085 cases were denied; and 4,471 cases were dismissed without being evaluated, often on procedural grounds. The asylum admission rate for the program, 0.1%, is dramatically lower than the 20% among other arriving immigrants. [14]

On July 15, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice announced an interim final rule to take effect on July 16 that would rule foreigners who cross the US–Mexico border ineligible for asylum if they had not previously applied for asylum in countries they had traveled through, effectively barring asylum claims on the border from nationals of Central America and Cuba. [16] [17]

Litigation

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) promised to immediately challenge the rule in court. [16] [17] On July 24, 2019, Judge Timothy Kelly of the DC District Court upheld the new rule, but that same day Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern California District Court issued a preliminary injunction against the rule in Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf, halting its implementation until the legal matters could be resolved. [18] In September 2019, the Supreme Court stayed an injunction against the rule in Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, [19] allowing the rule to take effect while legal challenges were pending. [20]

On March 4, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the "Remain in Mexico" program halted in the states under its jurisdiction, on the presumption that it violates statutory law; a lawsuit by various advocacy groups against the Department of Homeland Security is still awaiting final decision. [21] On March 11, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the injunction, [22] allowing the Trump administration to continue the program while litigation continues. [23]

Termination, reinstatement, and Supreme Court ruling (2021–present)

In February 2021, the administration of President Joe Biden ended the "Remain in Mexico" policy, resuming admission of new asylum seekers and the approximately 25,000 with pending cases to the United States, and asking the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal as moot. [24] [25] On August 14, 2021, a federal judge in Texas ordered a resumption of the Trump-era border policy that required migrants to remain in Mexico until their US immigration court date. [26] [27] The court ruled the reversal may have violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which prevents arbitrary regulations, because it did not consider various facts. [26] A stay to block reenforcement of the "Remain in Mexico" policy was denied by both the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court, [28] [29] compelling the administration to reinstitute the policy. [30] In December, the administration announced they had agreed to requirements by Mexico for the resumption of returns, including COVID-19 vaccination, completion of cases within 180 days, and inquiries into fears of return to Mexico. [31]

After the completion of negotiations with the government of Mexico, the Biden administration announced the resumption of the practice on December 2, 2021, with some alterations. [31] [32] On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Biden v. Texas that the Biden administration had the authority to end the policy. [33] [34]

The wind-down allowed migrants into the United States only after their next court hearing, and only if they were not deported. [35] This resulted in thousands of people staying in Mexico for weeks or months after the program was officially ended, and many missed their court dates due to travel difficulties. One advocate called this delay "a little cruel", and the government was criticized for accepting over 21,000 refugees from the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine at the Mexican border during the same timeframe without this restriction. [35] On December 15, 2022, U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk prevented the Biden administration from ending the program, ruling that it should stay in place while legal challenges play out, following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to return the case to the lower courts. [36] However, the judge did not order the policy reinstated. [37] In February 2023, Mexico's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced it rejects any efforts to reinstate the policy for asylum-seekers. [38]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexico–United States border wall</span> Series of border barriers

The Mexico–United States border wall is a series of vertical barriers along the Mexico–United States border intended to reduce illegal immigration to the United States from Mexico. The barrier is not a continuous structure but a series of obstructions variously classified as "fences" or "walls".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexico–United States border</span> International border

The Mexico–United States border is an international border separating Mexico and the United States, extending from the Pacific Ocean in the west to the Gulf of Mexico in the east. The border traverses a variety of terrains, ranging from urban areas to deserts. The Mexico–U.S. border is the most frequently crossed border in the world with approximately 350 million documented crossings annually. It is the tenth-longest border between two countries in the world.

William Alan Fletcher is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Appointed by President Bill Clinton, Fletcher was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 1998. Fletcher taught at the UC Berkeley School of Law from 1977 to 1998.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asylum in the United States</span> Overview of the situation of the right for asylum in the United States of America

The United States recognizes the right of asylum for individuals seeking protections from persecution, as specified by international and federal law. People who seek protection while outside the U.S. are termed refugees, while people who seek protection from inside the U.S. are termed asylum seekers. Those who are granted asylum are termed asylees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guatemala–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

There is a U.S. Embassy in Guatemala located in Guatemala City. According to the United States Department of State, relations between the United States and Guatemala have traditionally been close, although sometimes they are tense regarding human, civil, and military rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jon S. Tigar</span> American judge (born 1962)

Jon Steven Tigar is an American lawyer serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. He was previously a California state court judge on the Alameda County Superior Court from 2002 to 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals</span> Obama administration immigration policy

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, colloquially referred to as DACA, is a United States immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for an employment authorization document in the U.S. To be eligible for the program, recipients cannot have felonies or serious misdemeanors on their records. Unlike the proposed DREAM Act, DACA does not provide a path to citizenship for recipients. The policy, an executive branch memorandum, was announced by President Barack Obama on June 15, 2012. This followed a campaign by immigrants, advocates and supporters which employed a range of tactics. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications for the program on August 15, 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trump wall</span> Expansion of the Mexico–US barrier under President Trump

The Trump wall, commonly referred to as "The Wall", is an expansion of the Mexico–United States barrier that started during the U.S. presidency of Donald Trump and was a critical part of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign platform leading up to the year's election. Throughout his campaign, Trump called for the construction of a border wall. He said that, if elected, he would "build the wall and make Mexico pay for it". Then–Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto rejected Trump's claim that Mexico would pay for the wall; all construction in fact relied exclusively on U.S. funding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration policy of Donald Trump</span> Policies regarding immigration of the Trump administration

Immigration policy, including illegal immigration to the United States, was a signature issue of former U.S. president Donald Trump's presidential campaign, and his proposed reforms and remarks about this issue generated much publicity. Trump has repeatedly said that illegal immigrants are criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trump administration family separation policy</span> Policy intended to deter illegal immigration and to encourage tougher legislation

The United States family separation policy under the Trump administration was presented to the public as a "zero tolerance" approach intended to deter illegal immigration and to encourage tougher legislation. In some cases, families following the legal procedure to apply for asylum at official border crossings were also separated. It was officially adopted across the entire US–Mexico border from April 2018 until June 2018. Under the policy, federal authorities separated children and infants from parents or guardians with whom they had entered the US. The adults were prosecuted and held in federal jails or deported, and the children were placed under the supervision of the US Department of Health and Human Services. More than 5,500 children, including infants, were removed and hundreds have still not been reunited as of August 2022.

Family detention is the detention of multiple family members together in an immigration detention context. In the U.S. they are referred to as family detention camps,family detention centers, or family detention facilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexico–United States border crisis</span>

The Mexico–United States border crisis is an ongoing migrant crisis in North America concerning the migration of undocumented immigrants from Latin America, through Mexico, and into the United States.

Hope Border Institute is an independent grassroots community organization which addresses issues concerning migration and the Mexico–US border. It works from a perspective founded in Catholic social teaching.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drew B. Tipton</span> American judge (born 1967)

Drew Barnett Tipton is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Federal policy oversees and regulates immigration to the United States and citizenship of the United States. The United States Congress has authority over immigration policy in the United States, and it delegates enforcement to the Department of Homeland Security. Historically, the United States went through a period of loose immigration policy in the early-19th century followed by a period of strict immigration policy in the late-19th and early-20th centuries. Policy areas related to the immigration process include visa policy, asylum policy, and naturalization policy. Policy areas related to illegal immigration include deferral policy and removal policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration policy in Texas</span>

The state of Texas has a long history of immigration and immigration policy. The region that is now Texas was originally home to several Native American tribes. The first European immigrants arrived in the 1600s when the land was colonized by the French and the Spanish. Financial incentives created by the Mexican government brought many immigrants to Mexican Texas in the 1820s, mostly from slaveholding areas in the southern United States. This continued as significant illegal immigration to Mexico after 1830, when American migrants were banned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration policy of the Joe Biden administration</span>

Joe Biden's immigration policy is primarily based on reversing many of the immigration policies of the previous Trump administration. During his first day in office, Biden reversed many of Trump's policies on immigration, such as halting the construction of the Mexican border wall, ending Trump's travel ban restricting travel from 14 countries, and an executive order to reaffirm protections for DACA recipients. The Biden administration and Department of Homeland Security, under leadership of Alejandro Mayorkas, dramatically reined in deportation practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), prioritizing national security and violent crime concerns over petty and nonviolent offenses. However, Biden has also faced criticism for extending Title 42, a Trump administration border restriction that arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as restarting the use of expediting families in Central America, which can cause families to be sent back in weeks, compared to years for an average immigration case. In the fiscal year 2021, the US Border Patrol confirmed more than 1.6 million encounters with migrants along the US-Mexico border, more than quadruple the number in the previous fiscal year and the largest annual total on record. In January 2023, Biden announced a program to strengthen the admission of immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, while at the same time his administration will crack down on those who fail to use the plan's legal pathway and strengthen border security. In May 2023, the Biden Administration approved sending 1,500 more troops to the U.S.-Mexico border following Title 42's expiration.

Title 42 expulsions were removals by the U.S. government of people who had recently been in a country where a communicable disease was present. The extent of authority for contagion-related expulsions is set out by law in 42 U.S.C. § 265. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration used this provision to generally block land entry for many migrants. This practice was initially continued by the Biden administration before the program was ended with the end of the COVID-19 national emergency in the United States. Title 42 of the United States Code includes numerous sections dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights, but, in the context of immigration, the phrase "Title 42" came to be used to refer specifically to expulsions under section 265.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Lone Star</span> 2021 to present Texas border operation

Operation Lone Star (OLS) is a joint operation between the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Military Department along the southern border between Texas and Mexico, which started in 2021 and is currently ongoing. According to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, the operation is intended to counter a rise in illegal immigration, the illegal drug trade, and human smuggling. Between fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021, migrant apprehensions had risen 278% along the US-Mexico border. As of April 2022, OLS was spending approximately $2.5 million per week and was expected to cost approximately $2 billion per year. Approximately 10,000 National Guard members were deployed in support of OLS at the height of the operation, with around 6,000 deployed as of November 2022. According to the governor's office, OLS has resulted in 494,400 migrant apprehensions, 34,600 criminal arrests (including 34,600 felony charges), and 453 million doses of fentanyl seized. One year after the start of Operation Lone Star, Texas saw a 9% increase in migrant encounters along its border with Mexico, compared to a 62% increase in Arizona, California, and New Mexico along their respective borders with Mexico.

Biden v. Texas, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to administrative law and immigration.

References

  1. ↑ "Biden administration suspends Remain-in-Mexico border policy following court order". www.cbsnews.com. 8 August 2022. Retrieved 2023-01-29.
  2. ↑ "Half of Migrants Awaiting US Asylum in Mexico Faced State Abuse". Bloomberg.com. 2022-09-15. Retrieved 2023-01-29.
  3. ↑ Ables, Kelsey (December 16, 2022). "U.S. judge halts Biden attempt to end 'Remain in Mexico' policy". Washington Post. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  4. 1 2 Benner, Katie; Dickerson, Caitlin (2018-06-11). "Sessions Says Domestic and Gang Violence Are Not Grounds for Asylum". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  5. ↑ Aguilar, Julián (2018-12-19). "Federal judge overturns White House policy on asylum seekers fleeing domestic or gang violence". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  6. ↑ Human Rights Watch (2019-07-02). ""We Can't Help You Here" | US Returns of Asylum Seekers to Mexico". Human Rights Watch. Archived from the original on July 10, 2019. Retrieved July 15, 2019.
  7. 1 2 Sacchetti, Maria; Miroff, Nick (2019-06-20). "As Trump administration pushes to return more migrants to Mexico, legal battle over policy intensifies". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  8. ↑ "Presidential Proclamation Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the United States". whitehouse.gov . Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved 2019-07-15– via National Archives.
  9. ↑ Barnes, Robert (2018-12-21). "Supreme Court denies Trump administration request to immediately enforce new asylum rules". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  10. ↑ Liptak, Adam (2018-12-21). "Supreme Court Won't Revive Trump Policy Limiting Asylum". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  11. ↑ Alvarez, Priscilla (August 2, 2019). "Trump asylum ban is illegal, federal judge rules". CNN . Archived from the original on August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  12. ↑ "2020 Situation Report: Remain in Mexico" (PDF). January 29, 2020.
  13. ↑ "Migrant Protection Protocols". Department of Homeland Security. 2019-01-24. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  14. 1 2 "Remain in Mexico has a 0.1 percent asylum grant rate". San Diego Union-Tribune. 2019-12-15. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved 2020-01-22.
  15. 1 2 Phillips, Tom (2019-12-20). "Trump's 'shameful' migrant stance condemns thousands to violent limbo in Mexico". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved 2020-01-22.
  16. 1 2 Gurman, Sadie (2019-07-15). "Trump Administration Plans Tighter Asylum Rules at Southern Border". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  17. 1 2 Miroff, Nick; Kim, Seung Min (2019-07-15). "Trump administration moves to restrict asylum access, aiming to curb Central American migration". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-15.
  18. ↑ Jordan, Miriam; Kanno-Youngs, Zolan (July 24, 2019). "Trump's Latest Attempt to Bar Asylum Seekers Is Blocked After a Day of Dueling Rulings" . The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 25, 2019. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  19. ↑ Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, 140 S. Ct. 3 (September 11, 2019)
  20. ↑ "Court allows government to enforce restrictive asylum rule nationwide (UPDATED)". SCOTUSblog. 2019-09-11. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
  21. ↑ Dwyer, Colin (5 March 2020). "Court Blocks Trump's 'Remain In Mexico' Policy Along Part Of The Border". NPR.org.
  22. ↑ Wolf v. Innovation Law Lab, 140 S. Ct. 1564 (Mar. 11, 2020)
  23. ↑ Blitzer, Ronn, "Supreme Court gives Trump win by allowing 'remain in Mexico' policy to continue", Fox News , 11 March 2020
  24. ↑ "'Remain In Mexico' Policy's End Brings Renewed Hope To Asylum Seekers". NPR . 14 Feb 2021.
  25. ↑ "DOJ asks Supreme Court to cancel arguments over Trump border wall and 'remain in Mexico' policy". NBC News . 2 Feb 2021.
  26. 1 2 Alvarez, Priscilla; Sneed, Tierney (August 14, 2021). "Federal judge orders Biden administration to revive Trump-era border policy". CNN. Archived from the original on August 15, 2021. Retrieved August 15, 2021.
  27. ↑ Beaman, Jeremy (August 14, 2021). "Judge orders Biden administration to resume 'remain in Mexico' policy". Yahoo News. Archived from the original on August 14, 2021. Retrieved August 15, 2021.
  28. ↑ Liptak, Adam (2021-08-24). "Supreme Court Allows Revival of Trump-Era 'Remain in Mexico' Asylum Policy". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2021-08-25.
  29. ↑ "Supreme Court Orders The 'Remain in Mexico' Policy Reinstated For Asylum-Seekers". NPR. 24 August 2021. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
  30. ↑ Hurley, Lawrence; Hesson, Ted (25 August 2021). "Supreme Court requires Biden to revive Trump's 'remain in Mexico' immigration policy". Reuters. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
  31. 1 2 "U.S. will resume 'Remain in Mexico' policy for asylum-seekers". Associated Press. 2 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021– via NPR.
  32. ↑ "Biden Was Forced to Bring Back Trump's "Remain in Mexico" Policy, but Now He's Expanding the Pool of Immigrants Who Can Get Caught up in It". BuzzFeed News . 4 December 2021.
  33. ↑ Blitzer, Ronn (30 June 2022). "Supreme Court hands Biden victory, allows end to 'Remain in Mexico' policy". Fox News. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  34. ↑ Montoya-Galvez, Camilo (30 June 2022). "Supreme Court says Biden can end "Remain in Mexico" rule for asylum-seekers". CBS News. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  35. 1 2 Jasmine Aguilera (August 29, 2022). "The 'Remain in Mexico' Policy Is Officially Over. But Hundreds of Migrants Are Still Stuck in Mexico".
  36. ↑ Gans, Jared (15 December 2022). "Federal judge prevents Biden from ending Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy". The Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  37. ↑ "Judge blocks Biden bid to end 'Remain in Mexico' policy". Associated Press. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  38. ↑ Garcia, Amando; Owen, Quinn (7 February 2023). "Mexico rejects any effort to reinstate 'remain in Mexico' policy for asylum-seekers". ABC News. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.