Russell Brown | |
---|---|
Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada | |
In office August 31, 2015 –June 12, 2023 | |
Nominated by | Stephen Harper |
Appointed by | David Johnston |
Preceded by | Marshall Rothstein |
Succeeded by | Mary Moreau |
Personal details | |
Born | Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada | September 15,1965
Alma mater | University of British Columbia (BA) University of Victoria (LLB) University of Toronto (LLM,SJD) |
Russell S. Brown (born September 15,1965) [1] [2] is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace outgoing justice Marshall Rothstein and served in the role starting on August 31,2015. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court,he was a justice at the Alberta Court of Appeal,and before that a law professor at the University of Alberta. He resigned on June 12,2023,prior to the completion of an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council into alleged harassment.
Brown was born in Vancouver,British Columbia,and raised in Burns Lake,British Columbia. [3]
Brown has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of British Columbia in 1987 and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Victoria in 1994. He also received a Master of Laws degree in 2003 and a Doctor of Juridical Science degree in 2006,both from the University of Toronto.
Brown was admitted to the Bar of British Columbia in 1995 and to the Bar of Alberta in 2008. Before being appointed a judge he was associate counsel to Miller Thomson LLP and an Associate Professor and Associate Dean at the University of Alberta Faculty of Law. [4] His main areas of practice were commercial law,medical negligence,public authority liability,insurance law and trusts and estates.
In 2013,he was appointed to the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta. A year later in March 2014,he was appointed to the Court of Appeal of Alberta. [4]
He has expressed his views on a number of topics in a University of Alberta law faculty blog,prior to his appointment to the bench. He called the Canada Health Act “an inappropriate [federal] intrusion into sacrosanct provincial swimming pools,”referred to third party election spending limits as "odious" and "restriction on private expenditure during elections" as "objectionable",described human rights commissions as "puritanical functionaries", [5] and described himself as a "conservative libertarian". [1]
Brown was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace retiring justice Marshall Rothstein on the Supreme Court of Canada. Brown was his eighth and final appointment to the Court,as the Conservatives would lose the 2015 election. At the time of the nomination it was expected that Harper would name someone from Saskatchewan,but Harper opted for Brown instead,who was from Alberta. This meant that there would be two appointees from Alberta (Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin was also from Alberta),however this still satisfied the constitutional convention requiring two justices from Western Canada on the Court. [4] [6]
His appointment proved controversial due to the surfacing of his blog posts. The Toronto Star published an article from John Whyte,a professor emeritus at the Queen’s University Faculty of Law,criticizing the appointment. Whyte called Brown unfit for the Court because of his political writings and activism,and also attacked Harper for even naming a justice so close to an election campaign. [7] Brown would nonetheless be sworn in on August 31,2015,and without a Parliamentary hearing as Harper had discontinued the voluntary practice with the appointment of Suzanne Côté a year prior. [8] [4]
The appointment of Brown has been recognized in retrospect as one of three major appointments—alongside the appointment of Côtéa year earlier and the subsequent appointment of Malcolm Rowe by Justin Trudeau—which shifted the balance of the Court and ended an era of broad liberal consensus that dominated the McLachlin Court. [9]
Within his first year,Brown co-wrote the majority opinion for the blockbuster speedy trial case R v Jordan. A sharply divided Court established ceilings on how long the state has to bring an individual to trial. The decision attacked a "culture of complacency" that had developed towards the speedy trial rights of the accused and radically altered the application of section 11(b) of the Charter,leading to numerous cases being thrown out on account of unreasonable delay. [10] [11] [12]
After Jordan,Brown continued to show an inclination towards the rights of accused in cases that pitted law enforcement objectives against the fair trial rights of defendants. In R v Le he co-wrote a majority opinion throwing out the conviction of a young Asian-Canadian man,holding that he had been detained during an interaction with the police and should've consequently been advised of his right to counsel. The ruling emphasized how personal characteristics like race and youth can impact how individuals perceive police interactions,noting that certain forms of questioning that might seem voluntary to individuals from some communities might be perceived as compulsory and a detention to others. [10] [13]
His expansive interpretation of the legal rights in the Charter was also apparent in dissents he wrote,co-wrote,and joined. He dissented in R v JJ, in when the Court upheld a new rape-shield law which required pre-screening of private records before they could be admitted in trial. His dissent attacked the law as an unprecedented affront to the right to make full answer and defence,and as a form of defence disclosure that could taint the testimony of witnesses by allowing them to see the defences' evidence ahead of time. [14] In another unreasonable delay case R v KJM,this time in dissent,he co-wrote an opinion calling for the pretrial delay ceilings to be lower for juvenile offenders because of the uniquely prejudicial effect delay has on them. [15] In R v Stairs ,he joined a dissent by justice Andromache Karakatsanis,calling for tougher standards for when police officers can search the home. [16]
In June 2018,Brown wrote a high profile dissent with Justice Côtéon the topic of religious freedom in the case of Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western University . The case concerned the constitutionality of a law society's decision to refuse accreditation to a university because it required students to sign a covenant promising to refrain from sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage as a condition for studying at the university. [17] [18] The majority upheld the law society's decision as reasonable,but he wrote in dissent that "in a liberal and pluralist society,the public interest is served,and not undermined,by the accommodation of difference. The unequal access resulting from the covenant is a function not of condonation of discrimination,but of accommodating religious freedom." [19]
In March 2021,the Supreme Court found that the federal government's carbon price regime is constitutional. Brown was one of three dissenting justices. He concluded that the federal government's carbon price law was unconstitutional because it interfered with areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction. [20] Following the decision,Sean Speer wrote in the National Post that Brown "has distinguished himself as a powerful critic of judicial overreach in general and progressive jurisprudence in particular. In so doing,he’s become an intellectual beachhead for a nascent conservative legal movement in the country." He went on to write that his dissents "lay out an alternative viewpoint about the role of courts,the division of powers between Ottawa and the provinces and the relationship between the individual and the state." [21]
In February 2023,Brown took a leave of absence from the Supreme Court following a conduct complaint being reviewed by the Canadian Judicial Council. [22] [23] The complaint stemmed from the events of January 28−29,2023 at a resort in Scottsdale,Arizona. That evening,Brown delivered a speech on behalf of former Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour,who was receiving the 2023 O'Connor Justice Prize from Arizona State University. [24] According to the complainant in an interview with Postmedia,after being invited to join a group's table at the resort bar,he observed that Brown was intoxicated,and female members of the group later became "creeped out". [3] The complainant said Brown tried to follow them to their room,leading the complainant to punch Brown in the face repeatedly. [3] The police report,obtained by the Postmedia reporter,notes that both parties to the altercation were under the influence of alcohol,and no criminal charges were laid. [3] After the details of the complaint were reported on,Brown issued a statement calling the allegations "demonstrably false". [3] On June 12,Brown resigned effective immediately,ending the Council investigation. [25]
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices,whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law,and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial,territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural,hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual,hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.
Bora Laskin was a Canadian jurist who served as the 14th chief justice of Canada from 1973 to 1984. Laskin was appointed a puisne justice of the Supreme Court in 1970,and served on the Ontario Court of Appeal from 1965 to 1970. Before he was named to the bench,Laskin worked as a lawyer and in academia.
Ronald Martland,was a Canadian lawyer and Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was the second Albertan appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada,taking the place of Justice Nolan,who died after only a short time on the Court.
Rocco Galati is an Italian-born Canadian lawyer who specializes in cases involving constitutional law. He is the founder and executive director of the Constitutional Rights Centre.
William Ian Corneil Binnie is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada,serving from January 8,1998 to October 27,2011. Of the justices appointed to the Supreme Court in recent years,he is one of the few appointed directly from private practice. On his retirement from the Court,he was described by The Globe and Mail as "arguably the country's premier judge",by La Presse as "probably the most influential judge in Canada of the last decade" and by the Toronto Star as “one of the strongest hands on the court.”
Harper v Canada (AG),[2004] 1 S.C.R. 827,2004 SCC 33,is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the Court ruled that Canada Elections Act's spending limits on third party election advertising did violate section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but was justified under Section One of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Marshall Rothstein is a former Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta) [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313,commonly referred to as the Alberta Reference,was a leading opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that section 2(d) did not include the right to strike. In 2015,Alberta Reference was overruled,with the Court recognizing a right to strike in the Charter.
Thomas Albert Cromwell is a Canadian jurist and former Puisne Justice on the Supreme Court of Canada. After eleven years on the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal,Cromwell was nominated to succeed Michel Bastarache and occupy the seat traditionally reserved for Atlantic provinces on the Supreme Court of Canada by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and assumed office on December 22,2008. Cromwell retired in September 2016,and was succeeded by Malcolm Rowe.
Hate speech laws in Canada include provisions in the federal Criminal Code,as well as statutory provisions relating to hate publications in three provinces and one territory.
Horace Harvey was a lawyer,jurist,and a Chief Justice of Alberta,Canada.
Michael Moldaver is a former Canadian judge. He was a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada from his 2011 appointment by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper until his retirement in 2022. Before his elevation to the nation's top court,he served as a judge at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal for Ontario for over 20 years. A former criminal lawyer,Moldaver is considered an expert in both Canadian criminal law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Richard Wagner is a Canadian jurist serving as the 18th and current Chief Justice of Canada since 2017. He previously served as a puisne justice of the Quebec Court of Appeal (2011–2012) and of the Supreme Court of Canada (2012–2017). For several months in 2021,following Julie Payette's resignation as Canada's governor general,Wagner was the administrator of the government of Canada as well as chief justice.
Robert Patrick Armstrong is a Canadian lawyer and retired judge. He served on the Court of Appeal for Ontario from 2002 until his retirement in 2013. Before serving on the bench,Armstrong was a partner at Torys and was lead counsel in the Dubin Inquiry on steroid use in Canadian sports. After leaving the bench,Armstrong joined Arbitration Place,a Canadian group specializing in alternative dispute resolution.
Suzanne Côté is a puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. She was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace retiring Justice Louis LeBel. Before her appointment to the Supreme Court,she was a partner at Osler,Hoskin &Harcourt LLP and previously Stikeman Elliott LLP in Montréal. She is the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court directly from private practice.
Sheilah L. Martin is a puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada,having served in that role since December 18,2017. She was nominated to the court by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on November 29,2017. Before her appointment to Canada's highest court,Martin had served on the Court of Appeal of Alberta,the Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories,and the Court of Appeal of Nunavut since 2016,and the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta from 2005 to 2016.
In Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act 2021 SCC 11,the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on 25 March 2021 that the federal carbon pricing law is constitutional.
R v Stairs,2022 SCC 11 is a constitutional rights decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court established new standards for searches of a person's home after they have been arrested. At issue in the case was whether the traditional common law power of Search Incident to Arrest,which allows police officers to engage in warrantless searches of lawfully arrested persons,was compliant with section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it related to searches of the home.
Ontario v Fraser [2011] 2 SCR 3 is a Canadian labour law case concerning the protection of collective bargaining under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was an Ontario law that created a separate labour relations regime for agricultural workers. The Court considered the standard for establishing a breach of section 2(d) in cases where government action is alleged to interfere with collective bargaining rights. A majority of the Court upheld the law,finding no breach of sections 2(d) or 15 of the Charter.
Ritu Khullar,is a Canadian jurist who currently serves as the Chief Justice of Alberta and Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Appeal. She was appointed on November 28,2022 and sworn in on February 23,2023.
Russell Brown, the puisne justice for the Supreme Court of Canada, highlighted the qualities that contributed to Arbour's success.