Saint Francis's satyr

Last updated

Saint Francis's satyr
Neonympha mitchellii francisci individual cropped.png
Status TNC T1.svg
Critically Imperiled  (NatureServe) [1]
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Neonympha
Species:
N. mitchellii
Subspecies:
N. m. francisci
Trinomial name
Neonympha mitchellii francisci
Parshall & Kral, 1989 [5]
St francis satyr nc dist.png
NC range by county in red [6]

The Saint Francis's satyr (Neonympha mitchellii francisci) is an endangered butterfly subspecies found only in the US state of North Carolina. First discovered in 1983, it was first described by David K. Parshall and Thomas W. Kral in 1989 and listed as federally endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 1994. It is a subspecies of N. mitchellii and is restricted to a single metapopulation on Fort Liberty military base in Hoke and Cumberland counties. [7] The other subspecies, Mitchell's satyr ( Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii ), is also federally endangered. [8]

Contents

Physical characteristics

Wing patterns Neonympha mitchelli francisci, side, reared2 2019-08-07-17.21.31 ZS PMax UDR (48504193932).jpg
Wing patterns

The Saint Francis's satyr is a small butterfly with an average wingspan of 34–44 mm. It is dark brown, with distinguishing eyespots along the lower surfaces of both the upper and lower wings. The eyespots on its wings are primarily dark brown or maroon, rimmed with yellow and with flecks of white that reflect silver in the middle. They are usually round or slightly oval and found on the forewing and hindwing. There are two bright orange bands running along the lower wing edges and two darker orange bands across the middle of each wing. Females appear slightly larger and lighter brown than males, which is an example of sexual dimorphism. [7]

Life history and reproduction

Mating Neonympha mitchellii francisci pair.jpg
Mating
Empty chrysalis Neonympha mitchelli francisci, empty chrysalis, reared 2019-08-07-17.55.50 ZS PMax UDR (48504192372).jpg
Empty chrysalis

Adults live an average of three to four days. The subspecies is bivoltine, having two mating events per year. The first flight period occurs from late May to early June, and the second from late July to mid-August. Females deposit eggs individually or in small clusters that emerge as larvae in seven to ten days. [4] Caterpillars that emerge in early summer period form a chrysalis after two months, while those that emerge in late summer period hibernate over winter and pupate the following spring. Pupation may take up to two weeks. There is little historical information on the life history of the butterfly. Because of this, current research is being done at Michigan State University [9] and North Carolina State University [7] to better understand the butterfly's role in its ecosystem.

Diet

One known larval host plant of the Saint Francis's satyr is Mitchell's sedge ( Carex mitchelliana ), although it is likely that other sedges in the genus Carex also act as host plants. [10]

The diet of the Saint Francis's satyr as an adult consists primarily of nectar and tree sap. It also has been known to consume dung, pollen, and rotten fruit. In many cases, it is attracted to sodium, resulting in attraction to human sweat. [7]

Historic and present range

The Saint Francis's satyr was discovered in south-central North Carolina in 1980. Due to poaching and the lack of monitoring programs, many experts believed the species went extinct. Despite this, the species was rediscovered in 1992. Currently, the butterfly's range is completely isolated to the training fields of Fort Liberty, a military base in Cumberland and Hoke counties in North Carolina. [7] Though Fort Liberty is one of the largest military installations in the world, the butterflies only occupy a 10 square kilometer (3.38 square mile) area on the base. [7] Historically, several smaller subpopulations fell within the total range; currently, just a single metapopulation exists. The butterfly continues to be highly restricted in its distribution and has never been found outside of Fort Liberty. [11]

Habitat

The Saint Francis's satyr's habitat is composed of wide, open grasslands; wetlands; and sedge-dominant ecosystems that experience regular natural disturbance. [11] This disturbance is a result of beaver dam construction, natural fires, rainfall, or flooding. As a generally sedentary butterfly with delicate needs, it is imperative that these natural disturbances are maintained to create the habitat the butterfly needs to thrive. In addition to natural disturbances, the military operations at Fort Liberty create regular disturbances that help form wet meadows on the base. This habitat creation allows the Saint Francis' satyr population to be maintained at Fort Liberty. [11]

Present and historic population size

Currently, not much is known about the butterfly's historic population size. From 2002 to 2005, the population size of the Saint Francis's satyr was estimated to be between 500 and 1400 butterflies. [11] Usually small, their fragmented sites range from 0.2 to 2.0 hectares in size. Current numbers are estimated to be no more than 1000 individuals with no single population producing greater than 100 butterflies a year. [7] The decrease in population size throughout the years could be a result of fire suppression and beaver extermination. [11]

Endangered Species Act listing history

The butterfly was first listed under the Endangered Species Act in 1994 under an emergency rule, after threats of poaching and loss of habitat increased. [3] Since its listing, there have been notable efforts towards preventing the collection of these butterflies. However, poaching is still a threat due to the butterfly's rarity. To combat this, any known listings of colony location sites are kept from the public record. Between 1998 and 2016, more than $3 million was spent on additional conservation efforts for the Saint Francis' satyr. The main focus for conservation of these butterflies is continuing to preserve and grow the existing subpopulations, as well as enforcing the strict regulations on poaching and collecting. The five-year review for this species suggests the preservation of existing suitable habitats and for continued searching for the establishment of new populations. [12] The IUCN has yet to evaluate the Saint Francis' satyr.

Major threats

The Endangered Species Act (1973) outlines five criteria for committees to evaluate a species' status, seen below. At the time of its emergency listing in 1994, the Saint Francis' satyr faced threats in multiple of these categories.

Destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or range: The Saint Francis's satyr has experienced extensive habitat destruction and modification due to environmental change in the past 100 years. These changes resulted in the loss of the creation of wet meadow habitat due to beaver hunting and control measures, as well as human fire suppression. Experts believe the butterfly used to occupy a larger range but it has been reduced to two counties in North Carolina. [4]

Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes: Overcollection for recreational and aesthetic purposes was a serious threat at the time of the butterfly's listing, largely due to the butterfly's rarity. [4]

Disease or predation: There was no conclusive evidence of disease or predation as a threat to the Saint Francis's satyr. [4]

Inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms: There were no regulatory mechanisms on the local or federal level in place at the times of its listing. [4]

Other natural or man-made factors affecting continued existence: Natural factors affecting the Saint Francis' satyr's continued existence include limited dispersal ability and the resulting difficulty in establishing new colonies. The natural metapopulation structure of butterfly populations also presents challenges because it increases the likelihood of population destruction in extreme events such as natural disasters. The butterfly also has a higher likelihood of extinction due to disease because of reduced genetic variation in the population. [4]

Anthropogenic factors affecting the Saint Francis's satyr's continued existence include close proximity to roads increasing the likelihood of butterfly death via toxic chemical spills, pest control programs that help to mitigate the effects of mosquitoes and gypsy moths that harm butterfly populations, and human fire exclusion limiting the formation of habitat land for the Saint Francis's satyr. [4] However, its location on the Fort Liberty military base increases its survival because the frequent ecological disturbances created by troop movements allow meadow creation.

Current conservation efforts

Experts recommend downlisting the Saint Francis's satyr once two criteria are met: the metapopulation has stabilized or increased in number for at least 10 to 15 years and once there is a long-term plan to manage the species' survival. [13] To do so, there are regulations and a recovery plan in place.

Regulations

The ESA prohibits the sale, import, export, and removal of the Saint Francis's satyr to limit collection pressures. [13] There are also laws preventing federal agencies from taking part in activities that will harm the species in areas where they are vulnerable, including road construction, pesticide application, and beaver control. [4] However at the time of its listing, there were no laws in place in North Carolina protecting these butterflies. [12] Currently, laws have been passed to protect butterfly populations and their habitat, including regulations for federal agencies, prohibitions of certain practices, and recovery plans. [13]

Recovery plan

The following recovery plan strives to improve conditions for Saint Francis's satyr survival so that it can be downlisted to threatened before being delisted completely. Experts view a stable metapopulation as 200 adult individuals per brood. [12]

Protect and manage existing populations and their habitat: [13] This stage of the plan focuses on three key aspects.

  1. Monitoring existing populations: [13] A monitoring system has been in place since 2002 and has estimated population sizes at sites found outside artillery impact areas. [12]
  2. Protecting existing populations: [13] Researchers keep colony locations confidential and restrict military traffic around colony sites. [12]
  3. Managing for long-term species survival: [13] Researchers develop continual disturbance plans to create meadow habitat. Plans will outline goals, strategies, timelines, and funding sources. However, long-term management plans are incomplete because there needs to be a better understanding of disturbance factors. [12]

Continued research: [13] There is still much to learn about the life history of this butterfly, so research collaborations have been formed with North Carolina State University [12] and other organizations such as the Department of Defense. [4] These collaborations have yielded valuable information regarding population trends, species-habitat interactions, and dependence on disturbance. [12]

Search for additional populations: [13] Researchers have found three new subpopulations, but they are all restricted to Fort Liberty. In addition, the locations of these sites are highly restricted, so it has been difficult to monitor the population's health. [12]

A Saint Francis's satyr chrysalis in a captive rearing program at Fort Liberty Neonympha mitchellii francisci chrysalis.jpg
A Saint Francis's satyr chrysalis in a captive rearing program at Fort Liberty

Establish more wild populations in historic range: [13] This involves rearing butterflies in captivity for release and protecting habitat suitable for new colony sites. As of the five-year recovery plan in 2013, no new populations had been established. However, restoration efforts in four sites created meadows in 2011 so that they could potentially house future butterfly populations. [12] Once new populations are established, experts hope to increase connectivity between populations by implementing movement corridors. [4]

Implement information and education programs: [13] Since the public plays a large role in conservation, education programs are necessary for the success of this plan. Education plans focus on eliminating illegal collection and creating collaborations with landowners to restore commercial land to habitat suitable for these butterflies. Most outreach has been in the form of publication. [12]

Since the Saint Francis's satyr has not yet been downlisted, the five-year review recommends continuance with the goals outlined in the recovery plan in addition to preservation of existing suitable habitat and restoration of new suitable land for colonization. [12]

Taxonomy

Following its discovery, the Saint Francis's satyr was listed as a subspecies of the Mitchell's satyr ( Neonympha mitchellii ). The nominate subspecies, N. m. mitchellii, is distributed sparsely in the mid- and eastern US, including in Michigan, Alabama, Mississippi, and Virginia, and formerly New Jersey. Although the Alabama, Mississippi, and Virginia populations are morphometrically similar to Saint Francis's satyr, current molecular evidence supports that they are distinct from Saint Francis's satyr and that Saint Francis' satyr should remain as a separate subspecies from all other populations in the genus Neonympha with potential elevation to full species status pending further analysis. [14] [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Endangered Species Act of 1973</span> United States law

The Endangered Species Act of 1973 is the primary law in the United States for protecting and conserving imperiled species. Designed to protect critically imperiled species from extinction as a "consequence of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation", the ESA was signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 28, 1973. The Supreme Court of the United States described it as "the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of endangered species enacted by any nation". The purposes of the ESA are two-fold: to prevent extinction and to recover species to the point where the law's protections are not needed. It therefore "protect[s] species and the ecosystems upon which they depend" through different mechanisms. For example, section 4 requires the agencies overseeing the Act to designate imperiled species as threatened or endangered. Section 9 prohibits unlawful ‘take,’ of such species, which means to "harass, harm, hunt..." Section 7 directs federal agencies to use their authorities to help conserve listed species. The Act also serves as the enacting legislation to carry out the provisions outlined in The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The Supreme Court found that "the plain intent of Congress in enacting" the ESA "was to halt and reverse the trend toward species extinction, whatever the cost." The Act is administered by two federal agencies, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). FWS and NMFS have been delegated by the Act with the authority to promulgate any rules and guidelines within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to implement its provisions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Key deer</span> Subspecies of deer endemic to the Florida Keys

The Key deer is an endangered subspecies of the white-tailed deer that lives only in the Florida Keys. It is the smallest extant North American deer species.

<i>Hesperocyparis abramsiana</i> Californian species of western cypress

The Santa Cruz cypress is a species of North American tree within the cypress family. The species is endemic to the Santa Cruz Mountains within the Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties of west-central California. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the species on the Endangered Species Act in 1987 due to increasing threats from habitat loss and disruption of natural forest fire regimes. In 2016, the conservation status of the Santa Cruz cypress changed to Threatened. The cited reasoning was a decrease in threats against their habitat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miami blue</span> Subspecies of butterfly

The Miami blue is a small butterfly that is native to coastal areas of southern Florida. It is a subspecies of Thomas's blue. Once common throughout its range, it has become critically endangered, and is considered to be near extinction. Its numbers have recently been increased by a captive breeding program at the Florida Museum of Natural History.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mission blue butterfly</span> Subspecies of butterfly

The Mission blue is a blue or lycaenid butterfly subspecies native to the San Francisco Bay Area of the United States. The butterfly has been declared as endangered by the US federal government. It is a subspecies of Boisduval's blue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation</span>

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has a number of programs aimed at Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation, which include lands traditionally inhabited by the Mission blue butterfly, an endangered species. A recovery plan, drawn up by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1984, outlined the need to protect Mission blue habitat and to repair habitat damaged by urbanization, off highway vehicle traffic, and invasion by exotic, non-native plants. An example of the type of work being done by governmental and citizen agencies can be found at the Marin Headlands in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. In addition, regular wildfires have opened new habitat conservation opportunities as well as damaging existing ones.

<i>Echinacea laevigata</i> Species of flowering plant

Echinacea laevigata, the smooth purple coneflower, is a federally listed threatened species of plant found in the Piedmont of the eastern United States. Most populations are found on roadsides and other open areas with plenty of sunlight, often on calcium- and magnesium- rich soils.

<i>Pyrgus ruralis lagunae</i> Subspecies of the two-banded checkered skipper (Pyrgus ruralis)

Pyrgus ruralis lagunae, the Laguna Mountains skipper, is a butterfly of the family Hesperiidae. It is a subspecies of Pyrgus ruralis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawaiian coot</span> Species of bird

The Hawaiian coot, also known as the ʻ'alae ke'oke'o in Hawaiian, is a bird in the rail family, Rallidae, that is endemic to Hawaiʻi. In Hawaiian, ʻalae is a noun and means mud hen. Kea or its synonym keo is an adjective for white. It is similar to the American coot at 33–40.6 cm (13–16 in) in length and weighing around 700 g. It has black plumage and a prominent white frontal shield. Its natural habitats are freshwater lakes, freshwater marshes, coastal saline lagoons, and water storage areas. The bird was federally listed in October 1970 as an endangered species and is considered both endemic and endangered by the state of Hawaii. It is threatened by habitat loss and introduced predators such as the small Asian mongoose. The Makalawena Marsh on the Big Island of Hawaiʻi has been listed as a National Natural Landmark to preserve one of its last nesting areas.

<i>Apodemia mormo langei</i> Subspecies of butterfly

Apodemia mormo langei, the Lange's metalmark butterfly, is an endangered North American butterfly. It is a subspecies of the Mormon metalmark and belongs to the family Riodinidae. The butterfly is endemic to California, where it is known from one strip of riverbank in the San Francisco Bay Area. A 2008 count estimated the total remaining population at 131 individuals. Since 2011, this number has dropped to about 25–30.

<i>Asimina tetramera</i> Species of tree

Asimina tetramera, commonly known as the four-petal pawpaw, is a rare species of small tree or perennial shrub endemic to Martin and Palm Beach Counties in the state of Florida. The species is currently listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act and as endangered by the International Union for Conservation. The four-petal pawpaw is part of the family Annonaceae alongside other Asimina species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virginia big-eared bat</span> Subspecies of bat

The Virginia big-eared bat is one of two endangered subspecies of the Townsend's big-eared bat. It is found in Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and Kentucky. In 1979, the US Fish and Wildlife Service categorized this as an endangered species. There are about 20,000 left and most of them can be found in West Virginia. The Virginia big-eared bat is the state bat of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Endangered species</span> Species of organisms facing a very high risk of extinction

An endangered species is a species that is very likely to become extinct in the near future, either worldwide or in a particular political jurisdiction. Endangered species may be at risk due to factors such as habitat loss, poaching, invasive species, and climate change. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List lists the global conservation status of many species, and various other agencies assess the status of species within particular areas. Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species which, for example, forbid hunting, restrict land development, or create protected areas. Some endangered species are the target of extensive conservation efforts such as captive breeding and habitat restoration.

<i>Neonympha mitchellii</i> Species of butterfly

Neonympha mitchellii is an endangered species of nymphalid butterfly of the eastern United States. There are two known subspecies:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conservation-reliant species</span>

Conservation-reliant species are animal or plant species that require continuing species-specific wildlife management intervention such as predator control, habitat management and parasite control to survive, even when a self-sustainable recovery in population is achieved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quino checkerspot</span> Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) native to southern California and northwestern Mexico

The Quino checkerspot is a butterfly native to southern California and northwestern Baja California. It is a subspecies of the common Edith's checkerspot and the second such subspecies to be listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crystal skipper</span> Species of butterfly

The crystal skipper is a species of butterfly in the family Hesperiidae that is found only along a 30-mile (50 km) stretch of barrier islands in North Carolina. The skipper was first discovered in 1978 and the paper describing it as a full species was published in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bay checkerspot butterfly</span> Subspecies of butterfly

The Bay checkerspot is a butterfly endemic to the San Francisco Bay region of the U.S. state of California. It is a federally threatened species, as a subspecies of Euphydryas editha.

<i>Speyeria zerene hippolyta</i> Subspecies of butterfly

Speyeria zerene hippolyta, the Oregon silverspot, is a threatened butterfly that is found in the U.S. states of California and Oregon. It is a subspecies of Speyeria zerene.

<i>Rhadine infernalis</i> Species of beetle

Rhadine infernalis is a species of troglobitic beetle of the family Carabidae. They are endemic to the county of Bexar, Texas. Within this county, R. infernalis has been found in 39 caves. There are 2 named subspecies of R. infernalis: R. infernalis infernalis and R. infernalis ewersi. There is a third possible subspecies that has not been officially described. R. infernalis was classified in 2000 as endangered under the IUCN Endangered Species Act of 1973, along with 8 other karst invertebrates in the same region. It has the widest known range of the endangered karst invertebrates.

References

  1. ↑ NatureServe (7 April 2023). "Neonympha mitchellii francisci". NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data accessed through NatureServe Explorer. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
  2. ↑ "Saint Francis' satyr butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii francisci)". Environmental Conservation Online System. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Department. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
  3. 1 2 59 FR 18324
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Saint Francis' Satyr Determined To Be Endangered" (PDF). Federal Register. 60 (17): 5264–5267. January 26, 1995. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
  5. ↑ "ITIS Standard Report Page: Neonympha mitchellii francisci". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
  6. ↑ "Saint Francis' Satyr (Neonympha mitchellii francisci)". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original on December 20, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Saint Francis' satyr". Southeast Region of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original on 9 November 2021.
  8. ↑ "Mitchell's Satyr (Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii)". Midwest Region Endangered Species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 29 May 2019. Archived from the original on 5 April 2021.
  9. ↑ KBS News, Publications (18 June 2019). "New book chronicles researcher's quest for the world's rarest butterflies". W.K. Kellogg Biological Station. Michigan State University. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
  10. ↑ "The Saint Francis' Satyr – the Rarest Butterfly in North Carolina". Three Rivers LandTrust. August 29, 2016. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Kuefler, Daniel; Haddad, Nick M.; Hall, Stephen; Hudgens, Brian; Bartel, Becky & Hoffman, Erich (April 2008). "Distribution, Population Structure and Habitat Use of the Endangered Saint Francis Satyr Butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii francisci". The American Midland Naturalist. 159 (2): 298–320. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[298:DPSAHU]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0003-0031. S2CID   84946882.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 "5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation" (PDF). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. November 15, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Murdock, Nora (April 23, 1996). "Recovery Plan: St. Francis' Satyr" (PDF). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Retrieved April 16, 2020.
  14. ↑ Kuefler, Daniel; Haddad, Nick M.; Hall, Stephen; Hudgens, Brian; Bartel, Becky & Hoffman, Erich (2008). "Distribution, Population Structure and Habitat Use of the Endangered Saint Francis Satyr Butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii francisci" (PDF). The American Midland Naturalist. 159 (2): 298–320. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[298:DPSAHU]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0003-0031. S2CID   84946882.
  15. ↑ Hamm, C. A.; Rademacher, V.; Landis, D. A. & Williams, B. L. (2013). "Conservation Genetics and the Implication for Recovery of the Endangered Mitchell's Satyr Butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii" (PDF). Journal of Heredity. 105 (1): 19–27. doi: 10.1093/jhered/est073 . ISSN   0022-1503. PMID   24158752.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.