T-72 tanks in Iraqi service

Last updated
T-72
Vehicles at 1st Cavalry Division Museum 24.jpg
A captured Iraqi T-72 on display at the 1st Cavalry Division Museum, 2018
Type Main battle tank
Place of origin Ba'athist Iraq
Service history
Wars
Production history
Designer Kartsev–Venediktov
Produced1989–1990
No. built500-750
Specifications
Mass41.5 tonnes (45.7 short tons)
Length9.53 m (31 ft 3 in) gun forward
6.95 m (22 ft 10 in) hull
Width3.59 m (11 ft 9 in)
Height2.23 m (7 ft 4 in)
Crew3
Armor Mild steel,[ citation needed ] 45-300mm[ citation needed ]
Main
armament
125 mm 2A46M
Secondary
armament
  • 7.62 mm PKT coax machine gun
  • 12.7 mm NSVT antiaircraft machine gun or
    12.7 mm DShK AA machine gun
EngineV-12 diesel
780 hp (582 kw)
Power/weight18.8 hp/t
Suspension Torsion bar
Some dampers removed to suit desert conditions [1]
Operational
range
425 km
600 km with fuel barrels
Maximum speed 60 km/h (road)
45 km/h (off-road)

During the early stages of the Iran-Iraq War, Iraq under the rule of Saddam Hussein imported a number of T-72 tanks from the Soviet Union and Poland. The tanks saw service in both the Gulf War and the Iraq War. In the 1980s, Iraq also established a factory to retrofit and repair T-72s, and started the Lion of Babylon project (named after the Babylonian historical symbol of the same name) with the intent to assemble T-72s locally.

Contents

History

In the 1970s and 80s, Iraq purchased a hundred T-72 from the Soviet Union. Iraq utilized these tanks during the Iran-Iraq War, which temporarily put T-72 exports to Iraq to a halt. However, Poland started delivering T-72s in January of 1982, and in September of the same year, Soviet exports resumed as well. Overall, Iraq received about 1,038 T-72 tanks, primarily produced in Poland. Some of these were destroyed during the Iran–Iraq War, or captured by the Iranians. [2] As of 1996, Iraq had 776 T-72 tanks in service. [3]

Two years after the fall of Saddam Hussein, the new Iraqi Government acquired dozens of refitted T-72M1s from Hungary, in order to equip an armored brigade. The headquarters of this new Iraqi Army unit is located in Taji, where Iraq had attempted to assemble T-72s locally in the late 1980s. Some surviving T-72s are used for training, and the experience of Iraqi Army officers and crews with the T-72 was one of the reasons behind the choice of Hungarian T-72M1s. [4] [5]

Combat history and performance

T-72 tanks saw service in the 1991 Persian Gulf War as well as the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Like other tanks in the Iraqi inventory, T-72s were mainly employed as armored self-propelled artillery, rather than in maneuver warfare roles. In operations, it fared poorly against American main battle tanks and armored fighting vehicles. For example, a 120 mm depleted uranium (DU) APFSDS round from an M1 Abrams could knock out a T-72 tank well beyond 3,000 m, [6] while the effective range of the APFSDS 125 mm shell used by Iraq was 1,800 m. [7] The Iraqi T-72s used 3BM9 APFSDS shells (removed from Soviet service in 1973), [8] with a penetration only 245 mm at a distance of up to 2,500 meters (8,200 ft). [9]

The Iraqi T-72s, like most T-72 export versions, lacked then-modern night vision systems, though they did have some night fighting tanks with older active infrared systems or floodlights - just not the latest starlight scopes and passive infrared scopes as on the Abrams. [10]

Within closer ranges, the T-72 was more effective, especially while within prepared positions. [11] However, even in such conditions, the T-72 did not fare well against M1s—as proven in the Battle of Norfolk during Desert Storm, [12] although the tank also participated in the Battle of Phase Line Bullet, where Bradley IFVs from the 4th squadron of the 7th Cavalry Regiment were driven back by dug-in Iraqi armoured vehicles at heavy cost. [13]

Despite the relative thinness, a retrofitted reinforced armor plate present both at the turret and the front upper hull seems to have been relatively effective against some shaped-charge ordnance, like the TOWs and Hellfire missiles. There are reports of Iraqi T-72s surviving near-misses from these weapons, although the reinforced armor generally did not prevent a mobility kill. However, it is also possible that the unexpected survival rate was due to the electro-optical countermeasures mounted on most of the tanks rather than the added armor. [14] [15] [16] [17] There is evidence of at least one T-72 surviving a direct hit from an Abrams main gun in Mahmoudiyah in 2003. A 120 mm HEAT round from an Abrams impacted on the front of an Asad Babil turret at point blank range without producing a catastrophic kill. [18] Some T-72 tanks may have featured explosive reactive armor, possibly obtained from Polish T-72M1 spare parts. [19]

Another improvised armor upgrade may have also been added at the Taji complex. [2] An additional 30 mm armor plate was welded on the front areas of the hull and turret, leaving an air gap matching the size of the armor, so that the power of a HEAT jet could be dissipated in the hollow space. This technique follows the principle of spaced armor. The Iraqi engineers tested this reinforcement against captured Iranian 120 mm Chieftain tank guns in 1989, apparently with some success. [20]

Iran-Iraq War

Iraq deployed T-72s against Iranian forces during the Iran-Iraq War. The T-72s had success against Iranian 105mm M68 tank guns and TOW missiles, both of which were ineffective against the tank's front armor. [21] Overall, Iraq lost 60 T-72s during the war. [22] [23] Ra'ad Al-Hamdani, a general in the Iraqi Republican Guard, noted that the 10th Iraqi Armoured Brigade, which was equipped with T-72s, was able to destroy the 16th Iranian Armoured Division within twelve hours, despite Iran's numerical superiority. [24] The division included Chieftain tanks against which the T-72 proved effective; Iran started the war with 894 Chieftains, of which only about 200 were left by the end of it. [25] The 3BM9 APFSDS round was more than enough to deal with any NATO tank of the time, including the most heavily armoured such as the M60A1 and the Chieftain. According to a Soviet analysis of an Iranian Chieftain captured by the Iraqi army during the early part of the Iran-Iraq war, the Chieftain Mk.5 was considered to have totally insufficient protection even at its strongest points. The frontal part of the entire turret, hull upper front plate and lower front plate could all be defeated at 3 km or more. This essentially means that the T-72 Ural could defeat one of NATO's toughest tanks at any reasonable combat distance. [26] [ unreliable source? ] According to both sides, the T-72 was the most feared tank of the war. [27]

Invasion of Kuwait

Iraq deployed T-72s during the invasion of Kuwait alongside T-55s, T-62, and other models. [28] Kuwaiti tanks, which also included T-72s, [29] engaged Iraqi tanks at the Mutla Pass on August 2, 1990. Kuwaiti tanks knocked out one Iraqi T-72 during the fighting, but lost the overall battle. [30]

Gulf War

The bulk of Iraqi armoured units were mostly equipped with the Type 69 and only Republican Guard divisions were equipped with Iraqi-modified T-72s, with exception of the regular army's armored Saladin division. [31] Thus, engagements between T-72s and Coalition tanks were limited to conflicts involving such Iraqi units.

During Desert Storm, Iraqi T-72s were technologically 20 years out of date. Only one M1 Abrams was officially documented during the Persian Gulf War as having received enough damage to be towed and receive maintenance after being struck three times on the turret by a T-72. [32] Another six M1A1s were allegedly hit by Iraqi T-72 tank fire in the Gulf War official report, but the impacts were largely ineffectual. [33] According to Atkinson and Scales, T-72s accounted for at least two M2 Bradley kills during Desert Storm and left several damaged, all on February 26, 1991. [13] [34] Overall, the T-72 offered little challenge to Abrams and Challenger tanks, both of which could hit a T-72 from outside the range of T-72's main gun. [35] In addition to lack of range, exploding munitions facilitated by the design of the tanks' ammunition loading system were also an issue for Iraqi T-72s. [36]

2003 Iraq War

A T-72 abandoned after the U.S. attack into Baghdad. DerelictAsadBabil.JPEG
A T-72 abandoned after the U.S. attack into Baghdad.

During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Republican Guard's T-72s, most from the Medina Division, were deployed around Baghdad to attempt a last-ditch defense of the Baath regime. [37] In April 2003, U.S. tanks engaged their counterparts from just 50 yards, killing seven Iraqi T-72s without any losses. [38] Such encounters exposed the poor marksmanship of Iraqi gunners, in part due to the shortage of modern night-vision and range-finder assets. [39] The T-72s were even more technologically lacking at this time, and it is not known if any improvements to the tanks were made between the Persian Gulf War and this conflict. Nonetheless, one Bradley was largely disabled by a 125 mm round from an Asad Babil tank when Iraqi armoured troops attempted to attack their American opponents near Baghdad airport. [40]

The last operational T-72s acquired from the USSR and Poland were destroyed by the successive waves of American armored incursions on the Iraqi capital [41] or abandoned by their crews after the fall of Baghdad, several of them without firing a single shot. The derelict tanks were later scrapped by U.S. Army disposal teams or shipped to the United States for target practice.

War against the Islamic State

In April of 2017, the pro-government Hashed al-Shaabi militia used Iraqi-modified T-72Ms against forces of the Islamic State in clashes around the ancient city of Hatra. [42] [43] In the same year, the Iraqi army also used T-72s during the Battle of Mossul. [44]

Lion of Babylon project

In the late 1980s, Iraq attempted to locally produce the T-72, a Soviet-made main battle tank. The tanks were to be assembled at a factory near Taji in the Baghdad Governorate. [45] [46] The project was named "Lion of Babylon" (Arabic : أسد بابل, romanized: Asad Bābil), drawing its name from an ancient Babylonian symbol that was based on the Asiatic lion and represented the king of Babylon as well as the goddess Ishtar. It was triggered in part by the American embargo against the sale of military vehicles to Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War. However, it is disputed how many tanks outlined in the project were finished, and likewise whether the Iraqi tanks reported to be "Lions of Babylon" during the Gulf War and Iraq War were merely imported T-72s.

In 1986 a West German company built a factory in Taji to manufacture steel for several military uses. It was enlisted to retrofit and rebuild tanks already on duty in the Iraqi Army, such as T-54/55s, T-62s, and several hundred of Soviet and Polish T-72s, [47] imported during early stages of the war with Iran. [2] In the late 1980s, plans were made to produce new T-72M1 tanks at that facility. These tanks were to be assembled from knockdown kits delivered by the Polish state-owned company Bumar-Łabędy. [48] The local assembly of the T-72 was to start early 1989, as suggested by Iraqi officials. [47] A number of Iraqi officials such as Lt. General Amer Rashid, however, did not like the idea of being dependent on knockdown kits supplied by another country and pushed for the complete production of the T-72M1 tank instead. [47] [48] In 1991, the Taji plant was destroyed by an airstrike while being upgraded by Bumar-Łabędy. [48]

The United Nations imposed an arms embargo following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, which reduced the complete assembly of tanks to simple spare parts for T-72s and other tanks in the Iraqi arsenal. [47] According to Polish officials, not a single T-72M1 had been assembled at the facility, even though in 1988, a supposedly locally produced T-72M was on display during an Iraqi arms show. [48]

Specifications

Image showing the plate of laminated armor welded on the glacis of a T-72. Note the edges around the rectangular section of the towing eyes and driver's hatch. DerelictAsadBabil-2010-28-01.JPEG
Image showing the plate of laminated armor welded on the glacis of a T-72. Note the edges around the rectangular section of the towing eyes and driver's hatch.

In most aspects, the Lion of Babylon as proposed was physically identical to the T-72M1 it is based on. [49] Lion of Babylon T-72s were to be upgraded with the addition of laminated armor on the front slope and rear panels as protection against HEAT projectiles. [46]

American military intelligence believed some were equipped with Belgian-made thermal sights. [50] These same sources claim the tank was also supposed to be provided with a better track protection against sand and mud than the Soviet T-72, by reducing the original number of shock absorbers. [51] [1] [ self-published source? ] Some tanks also were fitted with a type of electro-optical interference pod of Chinese origin. [52] [53] As secondary armament, the tank was to feature either the NSV or the DShK 12.7 mm machine gun and the coaxial 7.62 mm PKT common to all T-72 models. The Lion's primary armor was intended to be identical to that of T-72M1, without any improvements. The Lion's side armor was supposed to have 60 mm protection, the turret side armor 300 mm, and the flat rear 45 mm thick. [54] [ verification needed ][ better source needed ]

Notes

  1. 1 2 JED website Archived 2008-09-19 at the Wayback Machine (available by free subscription)[ self-published source ]
  2. 1 2 3 ТАНКИ ИРАКСКОЙ АРМИИ [Iraqi Army Tanks]. otvaga2004.narod.ru (in Russian). December 29, 2009.
  3. ↑ "Сборник статей "ВВС и ПВО Ирака": "Оценка потенциала средств ПВО Ирака"". Archived from the original on 2019-09-11. Retrieved 2020-01-07.
  4. ↑ Jewell, Sgt. Lorie (November 2005). "Iraqi Army Takes Delivery of Tanks, Vehicles". defendamerica.mil. Multinational Security Transition Command-Iraq. Archived from the original on 2006-08-02. Retrieved 2006-08-03. Many of the division's soldiers drove T-72 tanks in the old Iraqi Army, so they are familiar with operating and maintaining them, leaders said. A handful of the tanks remain at Taji and are used for training purposes.
  5. ↑ "Iraq receives ex-Bulgarian T-72s and BMP-1s". Shephard. 2022-02-14. Retrieved 2023-07-17.
  6. ↑ Scales, page 298: "The Iraqi plan was to kill the American tanks on the ridge with dug-in T-72s and then drive the survivors back into the wadi and finish them off with artillery. The Iraqis, however, had no idea they could be detected and destroyed at a range of nearly 2 miles."
  7. ↑ Scales, page 261
  8. ↑ "Танки и БМП в бою: опыт современных" [Tanks and IFVs in combat: the experience of modern wars]. Modernarmy.ru. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2015.
  9. ↑ "2. БОЕПРИПАСЫ ТАНКОВЫХ ОРУДИЙ" [Ammunition of tank guns]. Militaryparitet.com. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  10. ↑ Early performance assessment of Bradleys and Abrams, p. 24.
  11. ↑ Scales, page 269: "As TF 1-37th Armor crossed over the ridge into the heart of the Iraqi defensive zone, the Iraqi commander's carefully disposed rear-slope defense stripped Dyer's tanks of their range advantage. Within 1,000 meters, a row of dug-in T-72s and BMPs suddenly appeared below the crest. All were hull-down in prepared positions behind thick dirt walls. Now the Americans were well within Iraqi killing range, and although the Soviet-made night sights were markedly inferior, things could still get very dicey."
  12. ↑ Scales, page 270: "After the war they (TF 1-37th) returned to count the burned-out hulks of 76 T-72s, 84 BMPs, 3 air defense artillery pieces, 8 howitzers, 6 command vehicles, 2 engineer vehicles, and myriad of trucks."
  13. 1 2 Atkinson, pp. 428-433
  14. ↑ Gollaher, Capt. Michael (May–June 1991), "Two Scouts Under Fire Helped Injured Buddies During Night Battle" (PDF), Armor magazine , p. 21[ permanent dead link ]
  15. ↑ Atkinson, p. 444, cites another case of a TOW bouncing off a T-72 and hitting the turret of another tank
  16. ↑ Brig. Gen. Scales hints that some Iraqi T-72s survived Hellfire strikes before the 1-37TF assault (p.268).
  17. ↑ Dispatches From Iraq; "To ensure complete catastrophic destruction of the second tank, Private First Class Davis fired a second Javelin, causing even more explosions on the second tank. At this point the third T-72 began frantically trying to determine the source and direction of incoming fire. Private First Class Jiminez engaged the now moving third tank. His round missed but impacted close enough to damage the tank."
  18. ↑ Conroy & Martz, p. 9
  19. ↑ Baumgardner, Neil. "Infantry magazine, September 1, 2004". Highbeam.com. Archived from the original on 2013-01-25. Retrieved 2013-02-03.
  20. ↑ "ТАНКИ ИРАКСКОЙ АРМИИ" [Iraqi Army Tanks]. otvaga2004.narod.ru (in Russian). December 29, 2009. В 1988-89 гг. эти танки прошли модернизацию по усилению защищенности верхних лобовых деталей корпуса танка. Это достигалось путем приварки дополнительного броневого листа толщиной 30 мм с воздушной прослойкой, такого же размера. Эта мера была предпринята иракцами после изучения возможностей защиты танков от поражения различными боеприпасами 120-мм английской нарезной танковой пушки L 11А5, установленной на иранских танках "Чифтен", захваченных Ираком в ходе войны.
    "In 1988-89. These tanks had been upgraded to enhance the protection of the upper front of the tank hull. This was achieved by welding additional 30 mm armored plating with stand-offs producing an air gap of the same size. This measure was taken by the Iraqis after experimenting with protecting tanks from defeat by various 120 mm ammunition from the British L11A5 rifled tank gun installed on Iran's Chieftain tanks, seized by Iraq during the war.
  21. ↑ Tom Cooper; Farzad Bishop (2003-09-09). "Fire in the Hills: Iranian and Iraqi Battles of Autumn 1982". Arabian Peninsula & Persian Gulf Database. Archived from the original on 2010-03-23. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
  22. ↑ "Забытая война: ирано-иракский конфликт". Army.lv. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  23. ↑ "Танки Иракской армии". Btvt.narod.ru. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  24. ↑ "Project 1946: Phase II". Ida.org.
  25. ↑ Andrew T. H. Tan (2014). The Global Arms Trade: A Handbook. Routledge. p. 126
  26. ↑ "T-72: Part 1". thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.com. 1 May 2015. Retrieved 5 December 2024.
  27. ↑ Interview – Iranian Tank Commander, McCaul ED, Apr-2004, Military History, Vol. 21 No. 1; "Saddam's Generals: Perspectives of the Iran-Iraq War", Youssef Aboul-Enein
  28. ↑ "Al Moqatel - التحضير العسكري العراقي لغزو الكويت (التخطيط ـ إعداد مسرح العمليات ـ الفتح "الانتشار" الإستراتيجي)". 14 July 2014. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  29. ↑ "Global Arms Exports to Iraq, 1960—1990". Rand Corporation
  30. ↑ Kevin M. Woods (2008). "Iraqi Perspectives Project Phase II". Um Al-Ma'arik (The Mother of All Battles): Operational and Strategic Insights from an Iraqi Perspective, Volume 1 (revised May 2008). Institute for Defense Analyses. pp. 117–118
  31. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson, T-72... p.38
  32. ↑ AMCCT test
  33. ↑ Fahey, Dan: Collateral Damage...During the ground war, only seven M1A1's were hit by rounds fired from the Iraqi's T-72 tanks, with none being seriously damaged. See also: George F. Hofmann & Donn A. Starry, pag.9
  34. ↑ Scales, p. 273
  35. ↑ Lockwood, Dean (2022-05-02). "So Much for the Myth of Russian Main Battle Tank Superiority". Defense Security Monitor. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  36. ↑ Lendon, Brad (2022-04-27). "Russia's tanks in Ukraine have a 'jack-in-the-box' design flaw. And the West has known about it since the Gulf War". CNN. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  37. ↑ Zucchino, page 3
  38. ↑ Conroy & Mars, p. 158
  39. ↑ Scales, page 268: "The Iraqi gunners were poor marksmen and their green tracer sabots hit nothing."
  40. ↑ Fontenot, Degen and Thon, p. 306
  41. ↑ John Pike (2003-04-05). "GlobalSecurity.org". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2013-02-03.
  42. ↑ Al-Rubaye, Ahmad (2017-04-26). "Iraqi forces seize ancient site of Hatra from IS". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 2023-07-17.
  43. ↑ Taylor, Alan (2017-06-28). "The Battle for Mosul Enters Its Final Stage". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2023-07-17.
  44. ↑ "Bataille de Mossoul: la police et l'armée irakienne progressent difficilement dans la vieille ville". FranceSoir (in French). 2017-05-05. Archived from the original on 2019-12-25. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  45. ↑ Steven J. Zaloga & Peter Sarson (1993), p. 24
  46. 1 2 "Baath Ground Forces Equipment", globalsecurity.org, The Russian T-72M1 Main Battle Tank (MBT) was modified with additional armor in the front and rear to protect against HEAT projectiles. This "Lion of Babylon" tank was produced locally, and the technology was Iraqi. However, the Soviets made all the parts and it was assembled in Iraq.
  47. 1 2 3 4 Timmerman, Kenneth R (1991), "Chapter 16: The Gang's All Here", The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq, Houghton Mifflin, ISBN   978-0-395-59305-9
  48. 1 2 3 4 Zaloga, Steven J. (2009). M1 Abrams Vs T-72 Ural - Operation Desert Storm 1991. Osprey Publishing Ltd. p. 24. ISBN   978-1-84603-432-9.
  49. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson (1993) p. 38
  50. ↑ Atkinson, p.443
  51. ↑ John Pike. "GlobalSecurity.org". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2013-02-03.
  52. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson, T-72... p.22
  53. ↑ "T72 Tank". fas.org (Picture of Iraqi T-72 featuring an optical interference pod). Federation of American Scientists.
  54. ↑ Data retrieved from Isby, Weapons and tactics...

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M1 Abrams</span> American main battle tank

The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense and named for General Creighton Abrams. Conceived for modern armored ground warfare, it is one of the heaviest tanks in service at nearly 73.6 short tons. It introduced several modern technologies to the United States armored forces, including a multifuel turbine engine, sophisticated Chobham composite armor, a computer fire control system, separate ammunition storage in a blowout compartment, and NBC protection for crew safety. Initial models of the M1 were armed with a 105 mm M68 gun, while later variants feature a license-produced Rheinmetall 120 mm L/44 designated M256.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-72</span> Soviet/Russian main battle tank

The T-72 is a family of Soviet main battle tanks that entered production in 1973. The T-72 was a development based on the T-64 using thought and design of the previous Object 167M. About 25,000 T-72 tanks have been built, and refurbishment has enabled many to remain in service for decades. It has been widely exported and has seen service in 40 countries and in numerous conflicts. The Russian T-90 introduced in 1992 and the Chinese Type 99 are further developments of the T-72. Production and development of various modernized T-72 models continues today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IS tank family</span> Series of Soviet WWII heavy tanks

The IS tanks were a series of heavy tanks developed as a successor to the KV-series by the Soviet Union during World War II. The IS acronym is the anglicized initialism of Joseph Stalin. The heavy tanks were designed as a response to the capture of a German Tiger I in 1943. They were mainly designed as breakthrough tanks, firing a heavy high-explosive shell that was useful against entrenchments and bunkers. The IS-2 went into service in April 1944 and was used as a spearhead by the Red Army in the final stage of the Battle of Berlin. The IS-3 served on the Chinese-Soviet border, the Hungarian Revolution, the Prague Spring and on both sides of the Six-Day War. The series eventually culminated in the T-10 heavy tank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-62</span> 1961 Soviet medium tank

The T-62 is a Soviet main battle tank that was first introduced in 1961. As a further development of the T-55 series, the T-62 retained many similar design elements of its predecessor including low profile and thick turret armour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BMP-1</span> Soviet infantry fighting vehicle

The BMP-1 is a Soviet amphibious tracked infantry fighting vehicle that has been in service from 1966 to the present. BMP stands for Boyevaya Mashina Pyekhoty 1, meaning "infantry fighting vehicle, 1st serial model". The BMP-1 was the first mass-produced infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) of the Soviet Union. It was called the M-1967, BMP and BMP-76PB by NATO before its correct designation was known.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M47 Patton</span> American main battle tank

The M47 Patton was an American medium tank, a development of the M46 Patton mounting an updated turret, and was in turn further developed as the M48 Patton. It was the second American tank to be named after General George S. Patton, commander of the U.S. Third Army during World War II and one of the earliest American advocates of tanks in battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PT-91 Twardy</span> Polish main battle tank

The PT-91 Twardy is a Polish main battle tank. A development of the T-72M1, it entered service in 1995. The PT-91 was designed at the OBRUM and is produced by the Bumar Łabędy company, part of the Bumar Group, a Polish technical military consortium. Changes from the T-72M include a new dual-axis stabilized fire-control system, reactive armour, a more powerful engine, transmission and new automatic loader.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FV101 Scorpion</span> Reconnaissance vehicle, Light tank

The FV101 Scorpion is a British armoured reconnaissance vehicle and light tank. It was the lead vehicle and the fire support type in the Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked), CVR(T), family of seven armoured vehicles. Manufactured by Alvis, it was introduced into service with the British Army in 1973 and was withdrawn in 1994. More than 3,000 were produced and used as a reconnaissance vehicle or a light tank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rheinmetall Rh-120</span> Smoothbore tank gun

The Rheinmetall Rh-120 is a 120 mm smoothbore tank gun designed and produced in former West Germany by the Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH company. It was developed in response to Soviet advances in armour technology and development of new armoured threats. Production began in 1974, with the first version of the gun, known as the L/44 as it was 44 calibres long, used on the German Leopard 2 tank and soon produced under license for the American M1A1 Abrams and other tanks. The 120-millimetre (4.7 in) L/44 gun has a length of 5.28 metres (17.3 ft), and the gun system weighs approximately 3,317 kilograms (7,313 lb).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Export variants of Soviet military equipment</span>

Export variants of Soviet military equipment were versions of Soviet military equipment of significantly inferior capability to the original designs and intended only for export. Monkey model was the unofficial designation given by the Soviet Armed Forces to such variants. The monkey model was exported with the same or a similar designation as the original Soviet design but in fact it lacked many of the advanced or expensive features of the original.

Tank development both evolved considerably from World War II and played a key role during the Cold War (1947–1991). The period pitted the nations of the Eastern Bloc and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) against each other.

The P'okp'ung-ho, officially the Chonma-215 and Chonma-216 are North Korean main battle tanks (MBT) developed in the 1990s. The tank may incorporate technology found in the T-62, T-72, and Ch'onma-ho MBTs. Outside parties codename the tank M-2002 because the tank went through performance trials on February 16, 2002, although the tank may have been in existence since 1992.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-100 tank</span> Soviet heavy tank prototype of the 1930s.

The T-100 was a Soviet twin-turreted heavy tank prototype, designed in 1938–39 as a possible replacement for the T-35 heavy tank. The T-100 was designed by N. Barykov's OKMO design team at S.M. Kirov Factory No. 185 in Leningrad. The T-100 was originally conceived with three turrets and was eventually built with two. It was in competition with a similar design, the SMK, but neither was adopted and instead a single turret version of the SMK was ordered as the KV-1. All three prototypes were tested at the same time in the Battle of Summa during the Winter War with Finland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-72 operators and variants</span> Main battle tank

The T-72 is a Soviet-designed main battle tank that entered production in 1973. It replaced the T-54/55 series as the workhorse of Soviet tank forces. In front-line Russian service, T-72s are being upgraded or augmented by the T-90, itself a modernized version of the T-72B. The T-72 has been exported and produced in many countries.

The M1 Abrams main battle tank has been in service since 1980. Since then, it has gone through dozens of upgrades and been the baseline variant of several vehicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanks of the United States</span> Evolution of American Tanks

The United States has produced tanks since their inception in World War I, up until the present day. While there were several American experiments in tank design, the first American tanks to see service were copies of French light tanks and a joint heavy tank design with the United Kingdom.

This article deals with the history and development of tanks of the Soviet Union and its successor state, the Russian Federation; from their first use after World War I, into the interwar period, during World War II, the Cold War and modern era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanks of the post–Cold War era</span>

The post–Cold War era is the period in world history from the collapse of the Soviet Union on December 27, 1991 to the present. During the Cold War, the Soviet domination of the Warsaw Pact led to effective standardization on a few tank designs. In comparison, France, Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom had previously developed their own tank designs, but now tried to standardize their designs, while the smaller nations of NATO purchased or adapted these designs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanks of Iraq</span>

Tanks have been utilized in Iraq both within the military and within several conflicts with their usage and origin after World War II; the Cold War; and the modern era. This includes imported Soviet tanks as well as British designs imported after World War II, and current American ones.

Tanks have been utilized in Iran both within the military and within several conflicts with their usage and origin after World War II; the Cold War; and the modern era. This includes internal Iranian made tanks, British designs imported after World War II, and American and imported Soviet tanks and those from China as well.

References

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.