Targeted Killing in International Law

Last updated

Targeted Killing in International Law
Targeted Killing in International Law.jpg
Book cover
AuthorNils Melzer
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
SeriesOxford Monographs in International Law
Subject Targeted killing
Genre Warfare
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date
29 May 2008
Media typeHardback
Pages524
ISBN 978-0-19-953316-9
OCLC 489257770

Targeted Killing in International Law is a book about the legality of targeted killing, written by Nils Melzer. It was first published by Oxford University Press in May 2008. The book explores the history of targeted killing as a government strategy by multiple countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Switzerland and Germany; for both military and law enforcement purposes. Melzer argues that directly after the September 11 attacks in the United States, perceptions of the tactic became more positive.

Contents

Melzer holds a PhD degree in law from the University of Zürich. His dissertation dealt with targeted killing and the book updates and revises that work. He had earlier written on the subject for Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law in 2006. Melzer serves as a legal advisor for the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). He has lectured at the Master-level at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights.

The book received a favorable reception and was a joint winner of the 2009 Paul Guggenheim Prize in International Law given by the Geneva Graduate Institute. It garnered positive reviews in publications including the International Criminal Justice Review , the European Journal of International Law, the Leiden Journal of International Law, the Australian Year Book of International Law, the American Journal of International Law , and in the book Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform.

Background

Nils Melzer graduated summa cum laude from the University of Zürich with a PhD degree in law. [1] [2] Melzer worked for the District Court of Meilen, Zürich, first as a Judicial Clerk and then as Judicial Secretary. [1] [2] Melzer serves as a legal advisor for the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). [3] [4] He lectured at the Master-level at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. [1] [2]

Prior to the book, Melzer published "Targeted Killing or Less Harmful Means? – Israel's High Court Judgment on Targeted Killing and the Restrictive Function of Military Necessity" in the Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law in 2006, [5] and a dissertation in 2007. [6] [7] Melzer also authored "Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law", published in 2009 by ICRC. [1] [2] Melzer's research was utilized in Section IX of the ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. [8] [9]

Targeted Killing in International Law is part of the series, Oxford Monographs in International Law. [10] The hardback was first published by Oxford University Press on 29 May 2008, [4] [11] and subsequently in the United States by Oxford University Press, USA in July 2008. [12] [13] In January 2009, the work was published online at Oxford Scholarship Online. [14] On 10 September 2009, Oxford University Press released a paperback in the UK. [15] Oxford University Press, USA released a paperback on 9 November 2009. [16]

Content summary

A Predator drone; used in targeted killings MQ-1 Predator unmanned aircraft.jpg
A Predator drone; used in targeted killings

Nils Melzer presents an historical, legal and moral examination of targeted killing. [17] The author observes that after September 11, the Western world grew more supportive of targeted killing than ever before. [17] The book recounts in depth how state-sanctioned targeted killing is perceived in other countries. [17] He defines targeted killing as the premeditated selection of an individual person not yet in custody for elimination by force. [18] Melzer analyzes all areas of the topic. [3]

The book discusses related legal practices of countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Switzerland and Germany. Israel was the first country to publicly acknowledge the practice—in November 2000. The author connects this policy initiative with Israel's ongoing conflict with Palestinian militants. Melzer argues that this policy was controversial—the issue came before the Israeli Supreme Court, where the matter was not decided for almost five years. The court's judgment was issued on 14 December 2006, but neither forbade nor endorsed the practice. Melzer asserts that it left multiple important legal conundra unresolved. Its significance was that it dealt not with a single incident, but rather with the nature of the policy itself and set forth conditions for examining the legality of future episodes. [17]

Melzer claims that during the Vietnam War the Central Intelligence Agency used targeted killings as part of the Phoenix Program, attempting to eliminate Vietcong sympathizers. Melzer cites a source who contends that some 40,000 individuals may have been killed under this program. The author sees the air raids on Muammar Gaddafi in the 1986 bombing of Libya in response to the Lockerbie bombing as another instance. He argues that after September 11, 2001, the policy became more acceptable in the U.S. to adopt targeted killings as a tactic. [17]

According to Melzer, after the September 11 attacks, U.S. strategists began to support targeted killings and accepted advice from Israel on how to use such tactics to deal with suicide bombers. Melzer describes an abrupt change where military members were ordered to "shoot to kill", replacing prior orders to incapacitate. The author asserts that in at least one case in 2005, a person was killed because they were thought to be a terrorist holding a bomb. It was later revealed that this person suffered from mental illness and may have had a medical history of bipolar disorder. The shooting was determined to be justifiable under the law and criminal charges were not filed. [17]

Melzer discusses the shift in perceptions towards acceptance by United Kingdom law enforcement after September 11. The Metropolitan Police officially endorsed a "shoot to kill" strategy directly after the attack. Melzer finds this policy shift incongruous, due to the fact that targeted killing had never before been acceptable as police strategy. Prior to the attack, targeted killing was a criminal offense. [17]

Reception

Targeted Killing in International Law was a joint-winner of the 2009 Paul Guggenheim Prize in International Law given by the Geneva Graduate Institute. [4] [19] In the chapter "Targeted Killing in U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy and Law" authored by Kenneth Anderson as a contributor to the book Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform, he characterizes Melzer's book as an admirable opus on the subject. [3] Anderson describes the book in more depth in a footnote, calling it a complete and thorough academic reference book. [3] He goes on to criticize the perspective of the book for describing and then rejecting objections by the United States to arguments addressed in the work. [3] Anderson writes that the book is both one scholars must have to educate themselves on the subject, while simultaneously lamenting its advocacy for U.S. legal positions. [3] Anderson observes the author covers all facets of targeted killing in the book. [3]

In a review of the book for the journal International Criminal Justice Review, Robert M. Worley of Penn State Altoona comments favorably on the comprehensive nature of Melzer's research and his descriptions of the differences of the practice of targeted killing in varying countries. [17] Worley comments on the relevance of the book to scholars in various fields, including history, law, law enforcement, and terrorism analysis. [17] Worley concludes his review by recommending the book for those with a fascination in researching criminal justice or the law. [17] William Abresch comments favorably on Targeted Killing in International Law, in a review for the European Journal of International Law. [20] He writes that the book is an important addition to the field of scholarship regarding how international law governs the practice of targeted killing. [20] Abresch calls the author's writing style logical, and praises the book's organizational structure including its separate sections on use of targeted in war contrasted with use by police. [20]

A review of the book in the Leiden Journal of International Law by Tamás Hoffmann recommends the work to multiple potential readers, including those who engage in targeting killing, academics, and students. [21] Hoffmann calls it a well-researched monograph and helpful reference work on the subject. [21] The review places the book within the context of addressing legal issues inherent in debating the murky concept of targeted killing. [21] Hoffmann states the book furthers prior attempts to come to a resolution on the question of the practice's legality. [21] Helen Durhan praises the writing quality of Melzer's work, in a review for the Australian Year Book of International Law. [22] Durhan writes the work is organized in an easily readable format and covers the topic with neutrality. [22] She goes on to call the book a work representing the need for concerned discussion prior to implementing any policy involved in eliminating people. [22] Of the author's focus throughout the work, Durhan observes that the author handles discussion of the legality of targeted killing in a clear and precise manner. [22] The review concludes Melzer's thorough analysis goes a long way towards furthering scholars' impressions of legal issues surrounding when it is permitted for sovereign governments to kill people. [22]

Writing in a review for the American Journal of International Law , Michael N. Schmitt observes that the arguments put forth in the book by Melzer are indeed accurate. [23] Schmitt writes that Melzer correctly argues that in the police model sequential events within the legal system lead to precedent for engaging in targeted killing. [23] Schmitt describes the book as an excellent overview of many aspects of law regarding targeted killing. [23] Schmitt concludes, "Targeted Killing in International Law is not just a major contribution to the legal literature, it has justifiably emerged as the premier work on the subject." [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of war</span> International regulations of warfare

The law of war is the component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war and the conduct of hostilities. Laws of war define sovereignty and nationhood, states and territories, occupation, and other critical terms of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Combatant</span> Person who takes a direct part in the hostilities of an armed conflict

Combatant is the legal status of a person entitled to directly participate in hostilities during an armed conflict, and may be intentionally targeted by an adverse party for their participation in the armed conflict. Combatants are not afforded immunity from being directly targeted in situations of armed conflict and can be attacked regardless of the specific circumstances simply due to their status, so as to deprive their side of their support.

International humanitarian law (IHL), also referred to as the laws of armed conflict, is the law that regulates the conduct of war. It is a branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting persons who are not participating in hostilities and by restricting and regulating the means and methods of warfare available to combatants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protocol I</span> 1977 amendment protocol to the Geneva Convention

Protocol I is a 1977 amendment protocol to the Geneva Conventions concerning the protection of civilian victims of international war, such as "armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation or racist regimes". In practice, Additional Protocol I updated and reaffirmed the international laws of war stipulated in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 to accommodate developments of warfare since the Second World War (1937–1945).

The code of purity of arms is one of the values stated in the Israel Defense Forces' official doctrine of ethics, The Spirit of the IDF. It states that:

The soldier shall make use of his weaponry and power only for the fulfillment of the mission and solely to the extent required; he will maintain his humanity even in combat. The soldier shall not employ his weaponry and power in order to harm non-combatants or prisoners of war, and shall do all he can to avoid harming their lives, body, honor and property.

Brigadier General Kenneth "Ken" Watkin, is a Canadian lawyer, soldier and jurist. Watkin was Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Canadian Forces from 2006 to 2010. He is an expert on military law.

Targeted killing, or assassination is a tactic that the government of Israel has used during the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the Iran–Israel proxy conflict, and other conflicts.

The Hague Initiative for Law and Armed Conflict is an initiative of the Netherlands Red Cross and the T.M.C. Asser Instituut. Its goal is to bring all actors in the field of International Humanitarian Law in the Netherlands together, and to disseminate International Humanitarian Law through different activities. Recently, HILAC has joined forces with the Amsterdam Center for International Law of the University of Amsterdam. The Hague Initiative for Law and Armed Conflict organizes a monthly lecture series, speakers in 2008 include:

The International Institute of Humanitarian Law (IIHL) is an independent, “non-profit, humanitarian association having social values as its objectives”, founded in 1970 in Sanremo, Italy. Its headquarters are situated in Villa Ormond, while a liaison office of the Institute is established in Geneva, Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geneva Conventions</span> International treaties of war

The Geneva Conventions are international humanitarian laws consisting of four treaties and three additional protocols that establish international legal standards for humanitarian treatment in war. The singular term Geneva Convention usually denotes the agreements of 1949, negotiated in the aftermath of the Second World War (1939–1945), which updated the terms of the two 1929 treaties and added two new conventions. The Geneva Conventions extensively define the basic rights of wartime prisoners, civilians and military personnel; establish protections for the wounded and sick; and provide protections for the civilians in and around a war-zone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simon Chesterman</span> Australian legal academic

Simon Chesterman is an Australian legal academic and writer who is currently a vice provost at the National University of Singapore and dean of the NUS College. He was the dean of NUS Faculty of Law from 2012 to 2022. He is also senior director of AI governance at AI Singapore, editor of the Asian Journal of International Law and co-president of the Law Schools Global League.

Nils Melzer is a Swiss academic, author, and practitioner in the field of international law. From 2016 until 2022, Melzer was the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He is a professor of international law at the University of Glasgow. From 2011-2013, he was Swiss Chair of International Humanitarian Law at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Melzer has criticised the governments of the U.S., the U.K., Ecuador and Sweden over their treatment of Julian Assange.

Orna Ben-Naftali is the rector of the College of Management Academic Studies and the Emile Zola Chair for Human Rights. She has previously served as dean of the Striks School of Law, College of Management Academic Studies.

The Tallinn Manual is an academic, non-binding study on how international law applies to cyber conflicts and cyber warfare. Between 2009 and 2012, the Tallinn Manual was written at the invitation of the Tallinn-based NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence by an international group of approximately twenty experts. In April 2013, the manual was published by Cambridge University Press.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael N. Schmitt</span> American international law scholar

Michael N. Schmitt is an American international law scholar specializing in international humanitarian law, use of force issues, and the international law applicable to cyberspace. He is Professor of Public International Law at the University of Reading, the G. Norman Lieber Distinguished Scholar at the Lieber Institute of the United States Military Academy at West Point, and the Charles H. Stockton Distinguished Scholar in Residence at the US Naval War College.

<i>Targeted Killings</i> 2012 book edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman

Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World is a non-fiction compilation book about targeted killing edited by Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, and Andrew Altman. It was published by Oxford University Press in 2012. The book grew out of contributions by the authors to a conference in April 2011 at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Targeted Killings features eighteen essays in five sections arranged by topic. The work argues that after the 11 September attacks by Al-Qaeda in 2001, the United States and other countries began to see the tactic of targeted killing differently. The practice of targeted killing had previously been accepted in situations of self-defence in military settings; after 11 September 2001 it was used to kill non-combatants and those not directly involved in a particular armed force.

Human shields are legally protected persons—either protected civilians or prisoners of war—who are either coerced or volunteer to deter attacks by occupying the space between a belligerent and a legitimate military target. The use of human shields is forbidden by Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions. It is also a specific intent war crime as codified in the Rome Statute, which was adopted in 1998. The language of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court prohibits "utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas, or military forces immune from military operations."

Hugo John Robertson Slim is a British academic and policy advisor in International Relations specialising in the ethics of war and humanitarian aid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robin Geiss</span> German international law scholar (born 1974)

Robin Geiss is a German academic specializing in public international law. In 2021, he was appointed by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres as Director of the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Prior to this, Geiss held various academic appointments including as Swiss Chair of International Humanitarian Law at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights and Director of the Glasgow Centre for International Law and Security at the University of Glasgow.

In international humanitarian law and international criminal law, an indiscriminate attack is a military attack that fails to distinguish between legitimate military targets and protected persons. Indiscriminate attacks strike both legitimate military and protected objects alike, thus violating the principle of distinction between combatants and protected civilians. They differ from direct attacks against protected civilians and encompass cases in which the perpetrators are indifferent as to the nature of the target, cases in which the perpetrators use tactics or weapons that are inherently indiscriminate, and cases in which the attack is disproportionate, because it is likely to cause excessive protected civilian casualties and damages to protected objects.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Dr Nils Melzer", Speakers' Biographies, ACO – Allied Command Operations, NATO / OTAN, 2010, archived from the original on 21 July 2011, retrieved 5 April 2014
  2. 1 2 3 4 Introduction, Dr. Nils Melzer, Legal Adviser for the International Committee of the Red Cross, 'Targeted Killing in International Law', The Graduate Institute, 16 October 2008, archived from the original on 10 November 2012, retrieved 5 April 2014
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Anderson, Kenneth (2009), "Targeted Killing in U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy and Law", in Wittes, Benjamin (ed.), Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform, Brookings Institution Press, pp. 360, 366, 394–395, ISBN   978-0-8157-0310-5
  4. 1 2 3 Oxford University Press (2010), "OUP: Melzer: Targeted Killing in International Law", OUP Catalogue, Oxford Monographs in International Law, ukcatalogue.oup.com, ISBN   978-0-19-953316-9, archived from the original on 28 August 2010, retrieved 5 April 2014
  5. ↑ Melzer, Nils (2006), "Targeted Killing or Less Harmful Means? – Israel's High Court Judgment on Targeted Killing and the Restrictive Function of Military Necessity", Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 9: 87–113, doi:10.1017/S1389135906000870
  6. ↑ Melzer, Nils (2007), Targeted Killing Under the International Normative Paradigms of Law Enforcement and Hostilities, Zurich: Schulthess Juristische Medien AG
  7. ↑ Römer, Jan (2010), Killing in a Gray Area between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Springer, p. 172, ISBN   978-3-642-04661-2
  8. ↑ Parks, W. Hays (Spring 2010), "Forum: Direct Participation in Hostilities: Perspectives on the ICRC Interpretive Guidance: Part IX of the ICRC 'Direct Participation in Hostilities' Study: No Mandate, No Expertise and Legally Incorrect", New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, New York University, 42: 769
  9. ↑ Melzer, Nils (Spring 2010), "Forum: Direct Participation in Hostilities: Perspectives on the ICRC Interpretive Guidance: Keeping the Balance Between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities", New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, New York University, 42: 831
  10. ↑ "Oxford Monographs in International Law", OUP USA Home, Oxford University Press, 2010, archived from the original on 17 October 2012, retrieved 10 April 2016
  11. ↑ Melzer, Nils (29 May 2008), Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0-19-953316-9
  12. ↑ Oxford University Press, USA (2010), "OUP: Melzer: Targeted Killing in International Law", OUP USA Home, www.oup.com, archived from the original on 29 June 2011, retrieved 10 April 2016
  13. ↑ Melzer, Nils (July 2008), Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, USA, ISBN   978-0-19-953316-9
  14. ↑ Melzer, Nils (January 2009), "Targeted Killing in International Law", Oxford Scholarship Online, www.oxfordscholarship.com, 1, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533169.001.0001, ISBN   9780199533169, archived from the original on 18 January 2012, retrieved 10 April 2016
  15. ↑ Melzer, Nils (10 September 2009), Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0-19-957790-3
  16. ↑ Melzer, Nils (9 November 2009), Targeted Killing in International Law, Oxford University Press, USA, ISBN   978-0-19-957790-3
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Worley, Robert M. (Penn State Altoona) (June 2010), "Targeted Killing in International Law", International Criminal Justice Review, United States, 20 (2): 211–212, doi:10.1177/1057567709356316, ISSN   1057-5677, S2CID   143462341
  18. ↑ Solis, Gary D. (2010), The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War, Cambridge University Press, pp. 538–539, ISBN   978-0-521-87088-7
  19. ↑ Oxford University Press, USA (2010), "Winner of the 2009 Paul Guggenheim Prize (Geneva Graduate Institute)", OUP USA Home, www.oup.com, archived from the original on 29 June 2011, retrieved 10 April 2016
  20. 1 2 3 Abresch, William (2009), "Targeted Killing in International Law", European Journal of International Law, Great Britain, 20 (2): 449–453, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chp012 , ISSN   0938-5428, archived from the original on 28 May 2012, retrieved 10 April 2016
  21. 1 2 3 4 Hoffmann, Tamás (December 2009), "Targeted Killing in International Law", Leiden Journal of International Law, Great Britain, 22 (4): 867–873, doi:10.1017/s0922156509990276, ISSN   0922-1565, S2CID   145512666
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Durhan, Helen (2008), "Targeted Killing in International Law", Australian Year Book of International Law, Australia, 27: 276–277, ISSN   0084-7658
  23. 1 2 3 4 Schmitt, Michael N. (October 2009), "Targeted Killing in International Law", American Journal of International Law , United States, 103 (4): 813–818, doi:10.1017/S0002930000160087, ISSN   0002-9300, S2CID   141219869

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.