Telephone number pooling

Last updated

Telephone number pooling, thousands-block number pooling, or just number pooling, is a method of allocating telephony numbering space of the North American Numbering Plan in the United States. The method allocates telephone numbers in blocks of one thousand consecutive numbers of a given central office code to telephony service providers. In the United States it replaced the practice of allocating all 10,000 numbers of a central office prefix at a time. Under number pooling, the entire prefix is assigned to a rate center, to be shared among all providers delivering services in that rate center. Number pooling reduced the quantity of unused telephone numbers in markets which have been fragmented between multiple service providers, avoided central office prefix exhaustion in high growth areas, and extended the lifetime of the North American telephone numbering plan without structure changes of telephone numbers. Telephone number pooling was first tested for area code 847 in Illinois in June 1998, and became national policy in a series of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) orders from 2000 to 2003. [1]

Contents

History

The North American Numbering Plan is a closed numbering plan, meaning that it assigns telephone numbers to individual endpoints based on a fixed-length telephone number. The national telephone number consists of a three-digit area code, a three-digit central office code, and a four-digit line number. Thus, each central office provides a resource of 10,000 telephone lines with a unique number each. While often enough for small communities, most cities require multiple central offices to service the community.

In the North American Numbering Plan, mobile telephones do not use distinct area codes from wireline services, but many central offices provide only wireless services, or just wireline services.

After the breakup of the Bell System on January 1, 1984, most telephone service areas in the United States were dominated by one carrier which held a monopoly on local service. The landline telephone systems evolved over a period of over one hundred years before diversification, so that it was technically difficult to share infrastructure between multiple providers. Central offices were established based on local demand and convention, and dialing prefixes were assigned to single providers who managed the plant in each location. This allocated all ten thousand line numbers of the central office code to one provider, even when demand could not exhaust the numbering pool. A new, competitive provider for the same area would be assigned the entire number space of a new central office prefix, reducing the overall efficiency of number utilization in the area.

Widespread introduction of the Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS) mobile phone service in 1983 created two competing carriers in each service area. Additional mobile carriers entered the market to provide digital service (such as GSM, introduced in 1991). In 1985, competitive access providers (CAPs) began to offer private line and special access services; originally based on private branch exchange (PBX) standards such as direct inward dial, these evolved into competitive local exchange carriers (CLEC). The Telecommunications Act of 1996 required incumbent telephone companies (ILECs) to interconnect with the new entrants.

Deployment of cable modems and voice over IP in the 1990s further blurred the boundaries between telcos and cable television providers. Every broadband Internet provider could become a telephone company, with telephony merely being one more application running over the packet-switched network. There was no requirement that the Internet to telephony gateway be operated by a facilities-based telco or cable company; anyone could buy a large block of telephone numbers from a CLEC, deploy a server to feed the calls to broadband Internet and offer telephone service.

With the advent of competition, each individual carrier required its own prefixes in each rate center, depleting available prefixes within high-growth and high-competition areas. Many of these new prefixes were sparsely used. This led to a rapid increase in the introduction of new area codes. [2]

Testing and deployment

Public resistance to the introduction of new area codes, whether as overlay complexes (which allowed customers to keep their existing numbers, but broke seven-digit local calling) or by area code splits (where the area code of existing numbers was changed), prompted the FCC and state commissions to introduce thousands-block number pooling, i.e. the allocation of number space in blocks of only 1,000 numbers (area code and one digit of line number), rather than of an entire central office prefix with 10,000 lines.

These developments largely coincided with the deployment of local number portability (LNP), a technology that allowed subscribers to keep their existing telephone numbers when switching to a different provider in the same community. The original LNP database contract was granted in 1996. [3]

Telephone number pooling relies on LNP as it relies on carriers to return blocks of mostly unused numbers. The thousand-number blocks being returned to the pool may be "contaminated" with up to a hundred working numbers which must be ported to a block which the carrier intends to keep. [4]

In 1998, the North American Numbering Plan Administration estimated that the NANP would have run out of area codes for 10-digit telephone numbers by 2025 at then-current rates of depletion. [5]

An initial number pooling trial was conducted in area code 847 in Illinois in April 1998. [6] Nortel had implemented support for thousands-level routing of calls in its equipment by 1999. [7] Pooling trials were conducted in 34 area codes across a dozen US states between 1997 and 2000. [8]

Area code 847, located northwest of Chicago, had already been subjected to multiple area code splits and a proposed overlay area code 224 with 10-digit local calling was drawing public backlash; inefficient allocation meant that some providers had been holding 10,000 number blocks in rate centers where they had few or no clients. [9] A carrier with a few thousand clients scattered across multiple rate centers often had 50,000 allocated numbers. [10] The state's telecommunications regulator, the Illinois Commerce Commission, at the urging of consumer advocates, [11] pushed back against industry and FCC demands for a distributed overlay for 847 from 1999 to 2001 [12] as half of the existing 847-numbers were not in use. [13] The Citizens Utility Board, a Chicago-based consumer group, attempted to litigate against an FCC requirement that calls within the same area code be dialed with the area code when 224 was introduced in 2002. [14] A similar fight by New York state's Public Service Commission to maintain seven-digit dialing within the same area code (including calls within 212) was also unsuccessful. [15] [16]

An attempt by the United States Telecom Association, a trade group of local telephone companies, to propose mandatory ten-digit dialing nationwide was rejected by the FCC in 2000. The FCC instead adopted many aspects of the Illinois Commerce Commission number pooling trial, including a requirement that telcos actually use 60% percent of their allocations (increased to 75% after three years) before requesting more phone numbers, allocation of new numbers to phone companies in blocks of 1,000 and a requirement that phone companies return unused numbers to a pool. [17]

Number pooling was implemented in various areas (including Spokane in January 2002 [18] ) with national rollout in the 100 largest metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) on March 15, 2002. [19]

While mandatory number pooling requirements originally existed only in the top 100 MSA's, the National Association of Regulatory Commissioners (NARUC) petitioned the FCC in 2006 to extend them to rural states to cope with demand for numbers for VoIP. [20] All US states have implemented their own regulations requiring that carriers implement number pooling. [21] By 2013, even sparsely populated Montana was using number pooling in order to extend the useful life of area code 406, the one area code in the state. [19]

In some areas, decreased code demand and conservation efforts have allowed the introduction of proposed new area codes to be delayed. [22] Area code 564, proposed to overlay the portion of western Washington State currently in area codes 206, 253, 360, and 425 was delayed in 2001 [23] as codes were reclaimed and numbers pooled; it was later reinstated, initially affecting area code 360 and expanding to the other mentioned area codes as needed, with 10-digit dialing mandatory as of September 30, 2017. [24] A proposed area code 445 overlaying Philadelphia was scrapped in 2003; [25] it was later reinstated, and went into effect on March 3, 2018. [26] An area code 582 intended to split Pennsylvania's existing area code 814 was abandoned in 2012. [27] A plan which would have implemented a concentrated overlay in 2002 in the greater Hampton Roads area, Virginia area code 757, was scrapped after number pooling was implemented, and it was not until 2022 that area code 948 was introduced as an all-services overlay area code.

Number pooling remains available to carriers on an optional basis in many US markets in which it is not yet mandatory.

Thousands-block number pooling is just one of several approaches for conserving numbering resources. Other options include consolidating multiple rate centers into one–as much of the problem is caused by carriers needlessly requesting a prefix in each rate center–allowing carriers to use a single prefix in each LATA or local interconnect region to port existing numbers from all rate centers in that area, [28] or even placing all the unused numbers in one rate center into a single available pool from which carriers port only what they–as already exists for toll-free telephone numbers with the SMS/800 database and RespOrg structure. [29] A block of 1,000 numbers per carrier, like the earlier allocation of 10,000 numbers per carrier in each rate center, is arbitrary. Local number portability permits telephone numbers to be assigned to carriers one at a time.

Implementation

In areas which were running short of numbers, blocks of 10,000 numbers would be assigned to an individual rate center; from there, it would be split into smaller blocks of 1,000 numbers each, for assignment to individual providers by a number pooling administrator.

According to 47 CFR 52.20, a US federal regulation administered by the Federal Communications Commission: [30]

The default National Number Pool Administration in the United States is Somos, [31] the North American Numbering Plan Administrator. [32] Canada has no number pooling. [33]

Local exchange routing databases now include a "block ID" to indicate the ownership of the specific sub-blocks within a prefix.

An example of a small hamlet with number pooling is La Fargeville, New York (population 600), in the 315/680 area codes. Once a small incorporated village built around a saw mill, its town hall closed in 1922. The La Fargeville rate center's local calling area is the same as neighboring Clayton, New York, yet there is a separate Verizon landline exchange for each village — likely as a historical artifact of an earlier era when telcos built many small, local stations. While both villages are served by separate, unattended remote switching centers controlled from Watertown, Verizon nominally has a half-dozen competitors offering local numbers in tiny La Fargeville: [34]

315-658-0Voxbeam Telecommunications
315-658-1
315-658-6		 Level 3 Communications
315-658-2
315-658-4		 Verizon Communications
315-658-3 Inteliquent (formerly Onvoy)
315-658-5 Broadview Networks
315-658-7 Bandwidth.com
315-658-8
315-658-9		 Spectrum

Ten thousand telephone numbers for a hamlet of 600 people is inefficient, but the actual result, were number pooling not available, would be seven times worse; each telephone company would be assigned an entire 10,000-number telephone exchange code for a total of 70,000 numbers. Repeating this method in the entire numbering plan area for each municipality would quickly exhaust the number of central office codes of the NPA.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North American Numbering Plan</span> Integrated telephone numbering plan of twenty North American countries

The North American Numbering Plan (NANP) is a telephone numbering plan for twenty-five regions in twenty countries, primarily in North America and the Caribbean. This group is historically known as World Zone 1 and has the telephone country code 1. Some North American countries, most notably Mexico, do not participate in the NANP.

A toll-free telephone number or freephone number is a telephone number that is billed for all arriving calls. For the calling party, a call to a toll-free number from a landline is free of charge. A toll-free number is identified by a dialing prefix similar to an area code. The specific service access varies by country.

A telephone numbering plan is a type of numbering scheme used in telecommunication to assign telephone numbers to subscriber telephones or other telephony endpoints. Telephone numbers are the addresses of participants in a telephone network, reachable by a system of destination code routing. Telephone numbering plans are defined in each of the administrative regions of the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and in private telephone networks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 416, 647, and 437</span> Telephone area codes for Toronto, Ontario

Area codes 416, 647, and 437 are telephone area codes in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the city of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Area code 416 is one of the original North American area codes created by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) in 1947. Area codes 647 and 437 are additional area codes for the same numbering plan area (NPA), forming an overlay numbering plan.

In telecommunications, an area code overlay complex is a telephone numbering plan that assigns multiple area codes to a geographic numbering plan area (NPA). Area code overlays are implemented in territories of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) to mitigate exhaustion of central office codes in growth areas. The method has been in use since 1992, and has been the exclusive method of area code relief since 2007.

Ten-digit dialing is a telephone dialing procedure in the countries and territories that are members of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP). It is the practice of including the area code of a telephone number when dialing to initiate a telephone call. When necessary, the ten-digit number may be prefixed with the trunk code 1, which is referred to as 1+10-digit dialing or national format.

Seven-digit dialing is a telephone dialing procedure customary in some territories of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for dialing telephone numbers in the same numbering plan area (NPA). NANP telephone numbers consist of ten digits, of which the leading three are the area code. In seven-digit dialing it is not necessary to dial the area code. The procedure is also sometimes known as local format or network format.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area code 564</span> Telephone area code for western Washington, United States

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 514, 438, and 263</span> Telephone area codes for Montreal

Area codes 514, 438, and 263 are telephone area codes of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for Montreal and most of its on-island suburbs, specifically the Island of Montreal and Île Perrot in the Canadian province of Quebec.

Area code 250 is a telephone area code in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the Canadian province of British Columbia outside the Lower Mainland, including Vancouver Island–home to the provincial capital, Victoria–and the province's Interior region. In addition, the numbering plan area extends into the United States community of Hyder, Alaska, located along the Canada–United States border near the town of Stewart. The incumbent local exchange carriers that service the area code are Telus, Northwestel, and CityWest in the city of Prince Rupert.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 678, 470, and 943</span> Telephone area codes for the Atlanta metropolitan area

Area codes 678, 470, and 943 are telephone area codes in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the U.S. State of Georgia in the Atlanta metropolitan area. The area codes are assigned in an overlay plan to a combined numbering plan area (NPA) consisting of 404 and 770.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 304 and 681</span> Area codes of West Virginia

Area codes 304 and 681 are telephone area codes in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the entirety of the U.S. state of West Virginia. The numbering plan area was established in October 1947 with area code 304, as one of the eighty-six original North American area codes. Area code 681 was added to the same area in an overlay plan that took effect on March 28, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 410, 443, and 667</span> Telephone area codes for east Maryland

Area codes 410, 443, and 667 are telephone area codes in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the eastern half of the U.S. state of Maryland. The numbering plan area (NPA) includes the Baltimore metropolitan area and the Eastern Shore. The three area codes are overlay codes for one numbering plan area, among which 410 was the initial area code for the NPA, when it was split from area code 301 in 1991. 443 and 667 found assignment primarily in cellular service and for competitive local exchange carriers, such as Comcast and Cavalier Telephone, when introduced, but have since become universal in carrier availability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area codes 513 and 283</span> Area code in southwest Ohio, US

Area codes 513 and 283 are telephone area codes in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) for the southwest of the U.S. state of Ohio, including Cincinnati and surrounding cities, such as Forest Park, Hamilton, Lebanon, West Chester, Mason, Maineville, Middletown, Milford, Norwood, Oxford, Harrison, Cleves, Miamitown and Trenton.

The expansion of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) is the anticipated requirement for providing more telephone numbers to accommodate future needs beyond the pool of ten-digit telephone numbers. Ten-digit telephone numbers have been in use in the United States and Canada in long-distance telephone service since the 1950s. An October 2020 analysis estimated that the numbering plan would not be exhausted until after the year 2050.

Telephone numbers in Canada follow the fixed-length format of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) of a three-digit area code, a three-digit central office code, and a four-digit station or line code. This is represented as NPA NXX XXXX.

National conventions for writing telephone numbers vary by country. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) publishes a recommendation entitled Notation for national and international telephone numbers, e-mail addresses and Web addresses. Recommendation E.123 specifies the format of telephone numbers assigned to telephones and similar communication endpoints in national telephone numbering plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telephone number</span> Sequence of digits assigned to a telephone subscription

A telephone number is a sequence of digits assigned to a landline telephone subscriber station connected to a telephone line or to a wireless electronic telephony device, such as a radio telephone or a mobile telephone, or to other devices for data transmission via the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or other public and private networks.

In the administration of the North American Numbering Plan, central office code protection is a numbering policy for maintaining local seven-digit dialing in communities that extend on both sides of the boundary line between multiple numbering plan areas (NPAs), such as in cross-border towns on state lines. Code protection prevents the use of the same telephone number on both sides by not assigning the same central office code of one NPA in the adjacent NPA.

In the North American Numbering Plan, a rate center is a geographically-specified area used for determining mileage and/or usage dependent rates in the public switched telephone network.

References

  1. ↑ "North American Numbering Plan Administration" (PDF). 2022. Retrieved 2023-06-18.
  2. ↑ "Why So Many New Area Codes?". LincMad. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  3. ↑ "Company History". Neustar. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  4. ↑ "NeuStar Number Pool Tools - FAQ, Answers". Neustar. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  5. ↑ "Your number is up!". OC Register. Archived from the original on February 22, 1999. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  6. ↑ "Expectations for a Number Pooling Trial in Illinois" . Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  7. ↑ "LNP and number pooling: a matched set?". Archived from the original on 2013-06-29.
  8. ↑ "NeuStar Initiates Mandatory Number Pooling Trial for Connecticut's 203 Area Code" . Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  9. ↑ "Area Code Mess Fuels Outrage In Land Of 847". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  10. ↑ "Group Sees Invisible Solution To Area Code Woes". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  11. ↑ "11-digit Dialing May Be Put On Hold". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  12. ↑ "Push For 2nd Code For 847 Area Crazy, Icc Chairman Says". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  13. ↑ "The Artificial Area Code Crunch". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  14. ↑ "11-digit dialing due for everyone". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  15. ↑ "The 10- or 11-Digit Local Call Fosters Anxiety and Shrugs". NY Times. 23 January 2003. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  16. ↑ "Days are numbered for 7-digit dialing". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  17. ↑ "Citing Callers' Inconvenience, Fcc Rejects Mandatory 10-digit Dialing". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  18. ↑ "WUTC: Number pooling starts January 8, 2002 in Spokane". Archived from the original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  19. 1 2 "Montana PSC Granted Authority to Implement Mandatory Number Pooling". FCC. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  20. ↑ "Resolutions Index" (PDF).
  21. ↑ CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS, Missouri Department of Economic Development, Division 240—Public Service Commission, Chapter 37—Number Pooling and Number Conservation Efforts
  22. ↑ Knauss, Tim (June 15, 2009). "No new area code for Syracuse". The Post-Standard . Syracuse, NY. Retrieved 2017-03-31– via syracuse.com.
  23. ↑ "PL-298: Suspension of 564 Overlay (Washington)" (PDF). North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA). August 29, 2001. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
  24. ↑ "PL-492: NPA 564 to Overlay NPA 360 (Washington)" (PDF). North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA). June 28, 2016. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
  25. ↑ "PL-332: PA 445 Implementation for 215/267 NPA Rescinded – 445 NPA Code Reclaimed" (PDF). North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA). September 24, 2003. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
  26. ↑ "PL-499: NPA 445 to Overlay NPA 215-267 (Pennsylvania)" (PDF). North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA). December 27, 2016. Retrieved April 1, 2017.
  27. ↑ McCracken, Denise (April 26, 2012). "PUC Dismisses Petition for 814 Area Code Relief". www.puc.state.pa.us. Retrieved 2017-04-01.
  28. ↑ "Rogers Wireless Partnership Part VII application regarding the requirement for a central office code in each served exchange". 12 April 2007.
  29. ↑ "LincMad on LNP and Number Conservation" . Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  30. ↑ "47 CFR 52.20 - Thousands-block number pooling" . Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  31. ↑ "Somos, Inc. is Awarded the North American Numbering Plan Administration and the Pooling Administration Contracts". PR Newswire. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
  32. ↑ "North American Numbering Plan Administrator - About" . Retrieved 8 September 2020.
  33. ↑ The Canadian Steering Committee on Numbering lists various proposals for discussion, ranging from number pooling to consolidation of rate centres to forcing overlay plans for all subsequent area code expansion, but as of 2014 nothing has been done.
  34. ↑ "NPA-NXX search". Local calling guide. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.