Third World approaches to international law

Last updated

Third World approaches to international law (TWAIL) is a critical school of international legal scholarship [1] and an intellectual and political movement. [2] It is a "broad dialectic opposition to international law", [3] which perceives international law as facilitating the continuing exploitation of the Third World through subordination to the West. TWAIL scholars (known as TWAIL-ers [4] ) seek to change what they identify as international law's oppressive aspects, [2] through the re-examination of the colonial foundations of international law. [2]

Contents

History

Early origins (Generation I)

TWAIL was inspired by the decolonization movements that occurred after World War II [3] in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. [1] Symbolically, the conference held in Bandung, Indonesia, in 1955 [3] is seen as the birthplace of TWAIL, as it was the first attempt by African and Asian states to create a coalition to address the issues specific to the Third World. TWAIL came about to address the material and ethical concerns as well as hardships of the Third World. [5]

New age movement (Generation II)

The study of TWAIL and its organization originated from a group of Harvard Law School graduate students in 1996. [6] Subsequent to a conference regarding post-colonialism, critical race theory and law and development studies held at Harvard Law School in December 1995, graduate students held a meeting to analyze the viability of creating third world approaches to international law. TWAIL scholars have subsequently held conferences at various universities:

Objectives

TWAIL's main objectives include:

Concepts

Third World

The Third World according to TWAIL-ers, is a group of states, which are politically, economically, and culturally diverse, but are simultaneously united in their common history of colonialism. [18] [19] TWAIL emphasizes that even after the end of the Cold War, the Third World is still a political reality. [18] Some TWAIL-ers believe this distinction to be even more alive today, due to the aggregation of diversification of states based on economic development. [19] They underline that the maintenance of the unity of the Third World is crucial in combating the continuing domination of the First World and that the term has no pejorative connotation. [20] The First World is considered to be the group of states engaged in imperial practices and which continue to dominate global politics and economics.

Approaches

TWAIL reconsiders the history and development of international law and highlights the colonial legacy inherent in it. [21] [22] [23] TWAIL reevaluates the power relationships of the current world order to eradicate the racial hierarchy and oppression present in international law. [24] [25] [26] Although the goal is common, the methods employed to effect those changes vary. Hence, TWAIL is a diverse and ‘coalitionary movement’ [2] [27] - its scholars use different methodologies like Marxism, feminism and critical race theory. Therefore, there is no elaborate common TWAIL doctrine, [28] [29] but all TWAIL-ers are nevertheless united in their struggle for the greater involvement of Third World peoples in international law.

International Law

TWAIL-ers underline that international law was created during the colonial era and that it was used to legitimize the global processes of marginalization and domination of the colonized people by Western powers. [30] They refuse to accept the universal character of the international legal system, as it emerged solely from the European and Christian tradition. [31] [32] [33] [34] In contrast, Third World countries were assimilated by force into the international legal system, which does not reflect their diverse heritage. TWAIL-ers reject the idea that after the end of World War II international law has moved on from its imperialistic origins. Although the system appears to be legitimized by recognizing human rights and the right to self-determination, TWAIL-ers believe that international law is still a tool of oppression and that decolonization processes were merely illusory. [35] [36] Amongst the modern forms of domination, TWAIL-ers include:

TWAIL-ers also emphasizes the inability of Third World leaders to secure the interests of their people and their failed opposition to the First World hegemony, which further hinders the struggle for the liberation of Third World peoples. However, TWAIL highlights that some concepts in international law simultaneously serve as both an instrument of oppression and emancipation – like the international human rights regime, which not only justifies the internationalization of property rights but also the protection of peoples’ freedoms. Hence TWAIL-ers recognize that some elements of the system need to be preserved.

Scholars

TWAIL is not a uniform school of thought and TWAIL-ers do not take a unanimous stance. Some of them are more reconstructionist while others are more oppositional [37] in their approach. Nevertheless, the scholars, in a decentralized network, share a common concern for the Third World. [29] Some of them teach TWAIL courses at various universities around the world.

First Generation

[38]

Second Generation

[ citation needed ]

Criticism

TWAIL-ers are sometimes accused of having a nihilistic approach. David P. Fidler, [39] Jose Alvarez and Naz K. Modirzadeh [40] criticize TWAIL for offering no positive agenda for action or reform in international law and relations. Alvarez uses the example of the genocide in Sudan and TWAIL-ers’ refusal to subscribe to the lobbying of the Security Council to take the desired action in the case. [41] Alvarez's own work contains many TWAIL-like themes and he has often been just as critical of certain liberal approaches to international law as TWAIL scholarship has been. Post-structuralist critiques of TWAIL assert that the argumentative logic of TWAIL ultimately operates according to the very conservative analytical framework it sets out to transcend. [42]

It has also be pointed out that the TWAIL movement, itself, was shaped by Europeans and North Americans, while purporting to speak on behalf of the "Third World". [43] Naz K. Modirzadeh has observed that "[t]he vast majority of TWAIL scholarship is produced and published in the Global North. Virtually all TWAIL gatherings have been organized and funded by Global North institutions, even in the rare event that they have physically taken place in the Global South." [44]

In a recent 2020 study, the TWAIL movement was criticised in relation to it justifying Civilizational Colonialism in the sensitive areas of High Asia (a metaphoric categorisation) in which many areas were included like Kashmir, Hazara, Nuristan, Laghman, Azad Kashmir, Jammu, Himachal Pradesh, Ladakh, Gilgit Baltistan, Chitral, Western Tibet, Western Xinjiang, Badakhshan, Gorno Badakhshan, Fergana, Osh and Turkistan Region. These rich resource areas are surrounded by the five major mountainous systems of Tien Shan, Pamirs, Karakoram, Hindu Kush and Western Himalayas and the three main river systems of Amu Darya, Syr Darya and Indus. The work highlights the role of United States, China, Russia, UK, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Iran and other players involved in The New Great Game over who will dominate High Asia. The work criticises TWAILers for ignoring sensitive areas like these and further tries to explore Pan-High Asianism and High Asian Approaches to International Law (HAAIL) as the potential way forward for the region which can be sub-categorised into the Western Pahari, Greater Dardic, Trans-Himalayan, Badakhshan and Sogdiana Belts. [45]

See also

Related Research Articles

Decentralization or decentralisation is the process by which the activities of an organization, particularly those regarding planning and decision-making, are distributed or delegated away from a central, authoritative location or group and given to smaller factions within it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Osgoode Hall Law School</span> Law school in Toronto, Ontario

Osgoode Hall Law School, commonly shortened to Osgoode, is the law school of York University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is home to the Law Commission of Ontario, the Journal of Law and Social Policy, and the Osgoode Hall Law Journal. A variety of LL.M. and Ph.D. degrees in law are available.

Subsidiarity is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate or local level that is consistent with their resolution. The Oxford English Dictionary defines subsidiarity as "the principle that a central authority should have a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed at a more local level". The concept is applicable in the fields of government, political science, neuropsychology, cybernetics, management and in military command. The OED adds that the term "subsidiarity" in English follows the early German usage of "Subsidiarität". More distantly, it is derived from the Latin verb subsidio, and the related noun subsidium.

The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) is an international body representing the interests of people who rely on libraries and information professionals. A non-governmental, not-for-profit organization, IFLA was founded in Scotland in 1927 with headquarters at the National Library of the Netherlands in The Hague. IFLA sponsors the annual IFLA World Library and Information Congress, promoting access to information, ideas, and works of imagination for social, educational, cultural, democratic, and economic empowerment. IFLA also produces several publications, including IFLA Journal.

The New International Economic Order (NIEO) is a set of proposals advocated by developing countries to end economic colonialism and dependency through a new interdependent economy. The main NIEO document recognized that the current international economic order "was established at a time when most of the developing countries did not even exist as independent states and which perpetuates inequality." In the spirit of "trade not aid," the NIEO called for changes in trade, industrialization, agricultural production, finance, and transfer of technology. The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and its accompanying program of action on 1 May 1974.

Functionalism is a theory of international relations that arose during the interwar period principally from the strong concern about the obsolescence of the state as a form of social organization. Rather than the self-interest of nation states that realists see as a motivating factor, functionalists focus on common interests and needs shared by states in a process of global integration triggered by the erosion of state sovereignty and the increasing weight of knowledge and hence of scientists and experts in the process of policy-making. Its roots can be traced back to the liberal and idealist traditions that started with Immanuel Kant and goes as far as Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points" speech.

The history of international law examines the evolution and development of public international law in both state practice and conceptual understanding. Modern international law developed out of Renaissance Europe and is strongly entwined with the development of western political organisation at that time. The development of European notions of sovereignty and nation states would necessitate the development of methods for interstate relations and standards of behaviour, and these would lay the foundations of what would become international law. However, while the origins of the modern system of international law can be traced back 400 years, the development of the concepts and practises that would underpin that system can be traced back to ancient historical politics and relationships thousands of years old. Important concepts are derived from the practice between Greek city-states and the Roman law concept of ius gentium. These principles were not universal however. In East Asia, political theory was based not on the equality of states, but rather the cosmological supremacy of the Emperor of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable forest management</span> Management of forests according to the principles of sustainable development

Sustainable forest management (SFM) is the management of forests according to the principles of sustainable development. Sustainable forest management must keep a balance between the three main pillars: ecological, economic and socio-cultural. The goal of sustainable forestry is to allow for a balance to be found between making use of trees while maintaining natural patterns of disturbance and regeneration. The forestry industry mitigates climate change by boosting carbon storage in growing trees and soils and improving the sustainable supply of renewable raw materials via sustainable forest management.

B. S. Chimni is a legal scholar and academic who is presently distinguished professor of international law member at Jindal Global Law School. His areas of expertise include international law, international trade law and international refugee law. He has been chairperson of the Centre for International Legal Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He had a 2+1⁄2-year stint as vice chancellor of the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences. He has been a visiting professor at the International Center for Comparative Law and Politics, Tokyo University, a Fulbright Visiting Scholar at Harvard Law School, visiting fellow at Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, and a visiting scholar at the Refugee Studies Center, York University, Canada.

International law is the set of rules, norms, and standards generally recognized as binding between states. It establishes norms for states across a broad range of domains, including war and diplomacy, economic relations, and human rights. International law differs from state-based domestic legal systems in that it is primarily, though not exclusively, applicable to states, rather than to individuals, and operates largely through consent, since there is no universally accepted authority to enforce it upon sovereign states. States may choose to not abide by international law, and even to breach a treaty but such violations, particularly of peremptory norms, can be met with disapproval by others and in some cases coercive action ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural development</span> Improving quality of life in rural areas

Rural development is the process of improving the quality of life and economic well-being of people living in rural areas, often relatively isolated and sparsely populated areas. Often, rural regions have experience rural poverty, poverty greater than urban or suburban economic regions regions due to lack of access to economic activities, and lack of investments in key infrastructure such as education.

Civil service reform is a deliberate action to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, professionalism, representativity and democratic character of a civil service, with a view to promoting better delivery of public goods and services, with increased accountability. Such actions can include data gathering and analysis, organizational restructuring, improving human resource management and training, enhancing pay and benefits while assuring sustainability under overall fiscal constraints, and strengthening measures for performance management, public participation, transparency, and combating corruption.

Makau W. Mutua is a Kenyan-American professor at the SUNY Buffalo School of Law and was its dean from 2008 to 2014. He teaches international human rights, international business transactions and international law. He is vice president of the American Society of International Law and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

<i>Asian Journal of International Law</i> Academic journal

The Asian Journal of International Law is a peer-reviewed law review focusing on public and private international law. It is an official publication of the Asian Society of International Law and is published by Cambridge University Press. It is produced by the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law and succeeds the Singapore Year Book of International Law. The editors-in-chief are Antony Anghie, Simon Chesterman, and Tan Hsien-Li.

This is a list of philosophical literature articles.

Internationalism is a political principle that advocates greater political or economic cooperation among states and nations. It is associated with other political movements and ideologies, but can also reflect a doctrine, belief system, or movement in itself.

International legal theory, or theories of international law, comprise a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches used to explain and analyse the content, formation and effectiveness of international law and institutions and to suggest improvements. Some approaches center on the question of compliance: why states follow international norms in the absence of a coercive power that ensures compliance. Other approaches focus on the problem of the formation of international rules: why states voluntarily adopt international legal norms, that limit their freedom of action, in the absence of a world legislature. Other perspectives are policy oriented; they elaborate theoretical frameworks and instruments to criticize the existing rules and make suggestions on how to improve them. Some of these approaches are based on domestic legal theory, others are interdisciplinary, while others have been developed expressly to analyse international law.

Antony T. Anghie is a law professor at the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law and Secretary-General of the Asian Society of International Law. He was previously the Samuel D. Thurman Professor at S. J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah and continues to serve as Professor at the College of Law. He has been visiting professor at numerous schools including the American University Cairo, Cornell Law School, the London School of Economics, Harvard Law School and the University of Brasilia.

Decentralized finance offers financial instruments without relying on intermediaries such as brokerages, exchanges, or banks by using smart contracts on a blockchain, mainly Ethereum. DeFi platforms allow people to lend or borrow funds from others, speculate on price movements on assets using derivatives, trade cryptocurrencies, insure against risks, and earn interest in savings-like accounts. DeFi uses a layered architecture and highly composable building blocks. Some applications promote high-interest rates but are subject to high risk. Coding errors and hacks have been common in DeFi.

Ram Prakash Anand (1933–2011) was an international legal scholar and a pioneer of Third World approaches to international law.

References

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 O. Okafor, (2005). "Newness, Imperialism, and International Legal Reform in Our Time: A TWAIL Perspective", Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43(1 & 2), p. 177
  2. 1 2 3 4 M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p. 38
  3. 1 2 3 4 M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p. 31
  4. ↑ L. Eslava, and S. Pahuja, (2011). "Between Resistance and Reform: TWAIL and the Universality of International Law", Trade, Law and Development 3(1), p. 26
  5. ↑ B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 4
  6. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48, p. 28
  7. ↑ "TWAIL III: The Third World and International Law". Opinio Juris (blog). 18 April 2007. Retrieved 27 November 2021.
  8. 1 2 3 K. Mickelson, (2008) "Taking Stock of TWAIL Histories", 10 INT. COMMUNITY L. REV. 355 p. 357
  9. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ↑ "Third World Approaches to International Law Conference (TWAIL) | WAYNE MORSE CENTER FOR LAW AND POLITICS". Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
  11. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  12. ↑ "Workshop on Third World Approaches to International Law - Faculty of Law, University of Colombo". Archived from the original on 9 April 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  13. ↑ "NUS - Faculty of Law : Asia's Global Law School | TWAIL". Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
  14. ↑ "Critical Perspectives on Race and Human Rights: Transnational Re-Imaginings". law.ucla.edu. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  15. 1 2 J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48, p. 8-9
  16. ↑ B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 22
  17. ↑ M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p.31
  18. 1 2 M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p. 35
  19. 1 2 B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 4-5
  20. ↑ M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p. 35 & 36
  21. ↑ A. Anghie; B.S. Chimni (2003) "Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts", Chinese Journal of International Law 2(1): pp. 77-103, p.78 and p. 84
  22. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 31
  23. ↑ B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 3 & 7
  24. ↑ A. Anghie; B.S. Chimni (2003) "Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts", Chinese Journal of International Law 2(1): pp. 77-103, p. 78 & 79
  25. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 35
  26. ↑ B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 26
  27. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 37
  28. ↑ M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p.36
  29. 1 2 J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 27
  30. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 26, 34, 38
  31. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 42
  32. ↑ M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40
  33. ↑ B.S. Chimni (2006) "Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto", International Community Law Review 8: pp. 3-27, p. 15
  34. ↑ A. Anghie; B.S. Chimni (2003) "Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts", Chinese Journal of International Law 2(1): pp. 77-103, p. 84
  35. ↑ M. Mutua, (2000) "What is TWAIL?", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: pp.31-40, p. 34
  36. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48, p. 39
  37. ↑ O. Okafor, (2005). "Newness, Imperialism, and International Legal Reform in Our Time: A TWAIL Perspective", Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43(1 & 2). p. 176
  38. ↑ O. Okafor, (2005). "Newness, Imperialism, and International Legal Reform in Our Time: A TWAIL Perspective", Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43(1 & 2). p. 177
  39. ↑ J. T. Gathii (2011) "TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network and a Tentative Bibliography", Trade, Law and Development, 3 (1): pp. 26-48. p. 43 and D.P. Fidler, (2003) "Revolt Against or From Within the West? TWAIL, the Developing World, and the Future Direction of International Law", 2(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 29.
  40. ↑ Modirzadeh, Naz K. (31 March 2023). "'[L]et Us All Agree to Die a Little': TWAIL's Unfulfilled Promise". SSRN   4406477.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  41. ↑ Alvarez, José E. (28 September 2010). "My Summer Vacation (Part III): Revisiting TWAIL in Paris".
  42. ↑ Haskell, John D. (4 March 2014). "TRAIL-ing TWAIL: Arguments and Blind Spots in Third World Approaches to International Law". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2481693 – via CrossRef.
  43. ↑ @VidigalGeraldo (7 September 2020). "Incidentally, if we talked about the origins of deconstruction and TWAIL,..." (Tweet). Archived from the original on 7 September 2020 – via Twitter.
  44. ↑ Modirzadeh, Naz K. (31 March 2023). "'[L]et Us All Agree to Die a Little': TWAIL's Unfulfilled Promise": 30. SSRN   4406477.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  45. ↑ Sharma, Vishal (2020). Civilizational Colonialism and the Ongoing New Great Game in the Sensitive Areas of High Asia: Exploring Pan-High Asianism as the potential way forward for the Western Pahari, Greater Dardic, Trans-Himalayan, Badakhshan and Sogdiana Belts possibly leading to High Asian Approaches to International Law (HAAIL). Academia (Thesis). Cardiff: Cardiff University. Retrieved 27 September 2021.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.