United States Servicemen's Fund

Last updated
The New Army Pamphlet by the United States Servicemen's Fund 1971 USSF The New Army Cover.jpg
The New Army Pamphlet by the United States Servicemen's Fund 1971

The United States Servicemen's Fund (USSF) was a support organization for soldier and sailor resistance to the Vietnam War and the U.S. military that was founded in late 1968 and continued through 1973. It was an "umbrella agency" that funded GI underground newspapers and GI Coffeehouses, as well as providing logistical support for the GI antiwar movement ranging from antiwar films and speakers to legal assistance and staff. [1] :p.61 [2] :p.24 USSF described itself as supporting a GI defined movement "to work for an end to the Viet Nam war" and "to eradicate the indoctrination and oppression that they see so clearly every day." [3]

Contents

Founding

USSF was started by several prominent anti-Vietnam War activists, including Army Captain and medical Doctor Howard Levy, initially working clandestinely from Leavenworth military prison where he had been sentenced for refusing to train Green Beret medics on their way to Vietnam; Fred Gardner, ex-Army reservist and founder of the first GI antiwar coffeehouse; Dr. Benjamin Spock and Professors Noam Chomsky; and Robert Zevin. [4] :p.25 In 1967, Gardner moved to Columbia, South Carolina, near Fort Jackson, the U.S. Army's largest training base and site of Dr. Levy's resistance and court-martial. [5] He was determined to prove that GIs would, as he put it, "rather be making love to the music of Jimi Hendrix than war to the lies of Lyndon Johnson." [6] With Donna Mickelson he opened the UFO counterculture coffeehouse, which was almost instantly popular among local young people and soldiers from the Fort. By early 1968, with encouragement from the UFO, 35 soldiers from the Fort organized an antiwar pray-in in front of the base chapel. [4] :p.23 [7]

As the word of GIs resisting the war began to spread in the broader peace movement, previously skeptical antiwar leaders began to support and help raise funds for additional GI support work. [8] This led in mid-1968 to the formation of the Summer of Support (SOS) headed by soon to be Chicago Seven defendant Rennie Davis, which channeled money and people power towards more GI coffeehouses. Its purpose was "to bring to public attention the extent of rank and file opposition to the war and military." By the fall of 1968 four coffeehouse had been established and the GI movement was gaining national recognition. [9] Gardner and Dr. Levy joined forces and helped to lead these efforts into the formation of USSF, with the West Coast branches calling themselves Support Our Soldiers, a tip of the hat to the SOS legacy from the Summer of Support. According to the historian Derek Seidman, "Continuity between the UFO, SOS and USSF was key to the latter’s success." Gardner and Dr. Levy helped raise money and promote the organization, with Levy often being the "source of original ideas about what the organization should undertake", while Mickelson and Judy Olasov did much of the day-to-day work helping individual coffeehouses start up. Robert Zevin became the organization's treasurer and office manager while Josh Gould, one of the founders of the Oleo Strut coffeehouse, worked in the Cambridge and New York City offices starting in 1970. [10] :pp.86&91 [11] :p.171 [12] [13] :pp.40–42 Gardner and Dr. Levy emphasized the importance of GIs "organizing themselves, with the civilian antiwar movement offering material and ideological support." [4] :p.27

Activity and growth

June 1972 cover of About Face, newsletter of the United States Servicemen's Fund About Face Cover June 1972.jpg
June 1972 cover of About Face, newsletter of the United States Servicemen's Fund

The next two to three years were the height of the GI antiwar movement and USSF played a key role by supporting it financially and helping to tie it together through bulletins, newspapers, staff training and traveling activists who facilitated communication between projects. [10] :p.92 In the summer of 1971 they organized a training course for potential project staffers which was attended by almost 50 people. The manual for this course so worried the House Committee on Internal Security that they entered it into the Congressional Record. [14] :p.7433 With support from USSF, the GI antiwar and coffeehouse movement grew from a few projects into an international GI dissent network. A list of USSF sponsors and contributors shows that it was supported by many of the most prominent people in the antiwar movement, including (in addition to those mentioned above) Bella Abzug, Shirley Chisholm, William Sloane Coffin, Ossie Davis, David Dellinger, James Forman, Betty Friedan, I.F. Stone, and Jane Fonda. Its publications also received support from several labor unions. In 1971, USSF published a pamphlet called The New Army (see cover image above) which listed a total of 76 "organizing projects, coffeehouses, and newspapers" they were supporting, as well as six USSF offices. [15] :p.92 USSF was probably the main way most antiwar civilians could interact with and support the growing GI movement.

As the GI movement grew, USSF was able to use its connections among GIs and with mainstream reporters to help spread stories the U.S. military was attempting to keep hidden. Paul Lauter, who led USSF from mid-1971 to mid-1972, described this in his memoir observing that among GIs, "nothing the military started up remained secret for very long." He recalled passing GI stories on to the news media about secret B-52 bombing runs from Guam which, once revealed, generated increased antiwar sentiment. The Nixon administration, Lauter said, viewed this "process as a form of espionage", but "it was simply GI democracy at work." [11] :p.178

The FTA Show

Rita Martenson, Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland Rita Martenson, Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland.jpg
Rita Martenson, Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland

Perhaps USSF's most well known project was the FTA Show, an anti-Vietnam War road show for GIs designed as a response to Bob Hope's patriotic and pro-war USO tour. It was the brainchild of Dr. Levy, who met with Jane Fonda on the set of Klute, convincing her to participate and help pull it together. [16] Fonda went on to recruit a number of actors, entertainers, musicians and others, including actors Donald Sutherland, Peter Boyle, Garry Goodrow, comedian and civil rights activist Dick Gregory, and singers Country Joe McDonald, Nina Simone, Len Chandler, Swamp Dogg, Holly Near and Rita Martinson. [4] :pp.104–6 USSF became the official sponsor of the show during its U.S. phase, with Gardner as the Tour's "stage manager and liaison to the coffeehouse staffs." [17]

In the spring of 1971, the show, referred to as "political vaudeville" by Fonda and The New York Times, began to visit military towns throughout the U.S. and then Asia. [18] At a press conference in New York City, Fonda and Dr. Levy announced their plans to kick off the Tour in Fayetteville, North Carolina, near the Fort Bragg Army base. The initial plans were for "an ambitious twenty-stop tour" of U.S. military bases, and the final results were even more expansive. According to Fonda in her autobiography, they performed "for some fifteen thousand GIs near major U.S. military bases" before heading overseas where they "did twenty-one performances". [19] :p.275 All told, "between March and December of 1971, the show toured to over 64,000 troops, playing near, but never on, bases in North Carolina, California, Washington, Texas, Idaho, New Jersey, Okinawa, Japan, the Philippines, and Hawaii." And this, even when GIs "might risk official or unofficial discipline for attending an antiwar show". [20] :pp.75,2 & 53 The historian Sarah King, quoting a The Washington Post reporter, described the show's popularity as "notable, considering the fact that 'it wasn't easy' for active-duty military personnel to attend FTA. Military authorities routinely 'put out misinformation about the time and place,' and GIs had to travel at their own expense (though the show itself was free). They also risked being photographed and harassed; Fonda recalls that the CID, 'the military equivalent of the CIA, was always around taking snapshots.'" [21]

GI coffeehouses

The Oleo Strut antiwar GI coffeehouse in 1971 was supported by USSF. Photo by Alan Pogue Oleo Strut by Alan Pogue 1971.jpg
The Oleo Strut antiwar GI coffeehouse in 1971 was supported by USSF. Photo by Alan Pogue

One of USSF's founding and ongoing objectives was to support GI coffeehouses near U.S. military bases. Although several of these were established before USSF's creation, the organization saw itself as responsible for supporting and strengthening this aspect of the overall GI movement. Their 1971 pamphlet The New Army listed almost thirty coffeehouses, movement centers, and local projects that had been created and were receiving USSF financial support. [10] :p.94 Over time, the coffeehouse model gave way to a broader conception which included a wider variety of other forms like bookstores, gathering centers, counseling offices, peace houses, and more, including coffeehouses. The February 1972 issue of the USSF newsletter About Face discussed the importance of these off-base gathering centers: "there is usually no place on base where more than four or five people can gather at one time without running the risk of being harassed by the military authorities." Moreover, there was no place on military bases and ships where GIs could see films, read books and newspapers, or hear speakers and entertainers that had not been pre-approved by the military. This same article described the growth of USSF's support from six projects in 1969 to over thirty in early 1972. [22] USSF established a "loose blueprint for the overall direction and purpose" of these projects. This included "educating GIs about the war" and "bringing together GIs who are opposed or become opposed to the war and the brass and helping them form more cohesive political organizations". It also "stressed the importance of maintaining a youth-oriented, alternative culture", a counterculture atmosphere. However, as the network of projects expanded, the USSF's "role in day-to-day operations was minimal"; it mainly provided financial and material support. Material support included entertainers, movies, projectors, typewriters, mimeograph machines, as well as radical books, magazines, and newspapers. The historian David Parsons argues that "USSF's support was vital" to the coffeehouse network, especially in its early years. [4] :p.27–8

GI underground newspapers

The Screwed GI, a favorite cartoon in GI underground newspapers Screwed GI.jpg
The Screwed GI, a favorite cartoon in GI underground newspapers

Another activity USSF considered vitally important and worthy of support was the creation of underground newspapers by and for GIs. Given the restrictions inherent in military life, the creation of an underground press was seen as essential for GIs to speak their minds and spread the word. The first issue of About Face, published in May 1971, observed that when USSF was first founded there were less than ten GI newspapers; this number had multiplied more than ten times to "well over a hundred." And USSF was proud to say they were giving financial support to about "half of these papers." [23] These newspapers, along with the GI coffeehouses and other projects supported by USSF, "helped sustain a broad community of troop dissent and a civilian-GI antiwar alliance" during the peak years of the GI movement. The newspapers spread the word among GIs, "facilitated communication between individual projects", and gave activists and troops the sense that they were part of a broader GI movement". [10] :p.92 By the time the Vietnam War had ended there had been over 400 GI underground newspapers and newsletters produced by and for GIs at U.S. militaries bases throughout the world. While USSF did not finance or support most of these, there is no doubt it had a significant influence on their initiation and creation, especially in the earlier days of the GI movement.

Organizing GI wives & WACs

During 1971 USSF began encouraging local projects to begin organizing GI wives and members of the Women's Army Corps or WACs. Perhaps the largest of these efforts was at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, one of the largest military installations in the world. In the August 1971 issue of the USSF G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin, the Fort Bragg Women's Project reported having a staff of eight women who were living "in one of the typical ghettos that military families are forced into." They described how they were trying to work within the community rather than through the local antiwar coffeehouse and that their focus was "to build a strong movement of GI wives against the military and against military aggression throughout the world." They condemned the Army's "blatant sexism" and "overt objectification" towards women and dependents and expressed their opinion that most of the women in Army towns could become a "force against the Army." [24] Another effort was at Fort McClellan in Anniston, Alabama, which at that time was the headquarters of the WAC. This was a smaller group but they put out one issue of a WAC directed newsletter called Whack!. They also made some unsuccessful efforts to reach out to lesbian WACs who would have faced severe repercussions if their sexuality was discovered by the Army. By early 1972, with the overall GI movement beginning to wind down, these efforts seem to have been abandoned. [25]

Publications

G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin first issue cover January 1971 GI News & Discussion Bulletin - Jan 1971.jpg
G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin first issue cover January 1971

In addition to supporting the publication of numerous GI underground publications, USSF put our several of its own newsletters. Its main external publication was About face! - The U.S. Servicemen's Fund Newsletter which came out for thirteen issues from May 1971 to June 1973 (see cover image above). Directed at the overall antiwar and GI movement and beyond, it was intended to spread the word about the GI movement and encourage civilians and GIs to get more involved and support its growth. USSF also produced the G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin, which was intended mainly for internal use. It was sent to all USSF and SOS projects to keep them informed about GI movement activity. Each project was encouraged to send in reports and articles. On the West Coast there were three additional publications, SOS News (LA) from Los Angeles that put out thirteen issues between January 1972 and February 1973, SOS News (SF) from Oakland and San Francisco that put out six issues in 1971, and the Coffeehouse News, also from the San Francisco Bay Area, which put out one issue in February 1969.

Tax exempt status revoked and reinstated

Shortly after its founding, USSF filed the necessary legal and tax papers to become incorporated as a nonprofit, nonstock corporation on January 6, 1969, and as a tax exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code on March 25, 1969. It stated its purposes were charitable, educational and scientific, "to provide recreational and educational services" for military personnel. It also described the "isolation, deprivation, and extraordinary sacrifice" of those in the military, while explaining USSF's plans to provide GIs with the educational and recreational opportunities already generally available to the broader population in the U.S. Service men and women would be provided with entertainment, books, newspapers and magazines. Despite the fact that USSF stuck to these principles, within a year of incorporation the IRS began to look into USSF's tax exempt status, likely one of several "organizations with a liberal or left orientation" recommended to the IRS for scrutiny by the Nixon administration. [26] [27] By June 1970, the IRS had started official revocation procedures. In January 1973, the District Director of the Manhattan IRS office wrote that after "careful review" they did not think USSF met the definition of "educational" as set for by income tax regulations and rulings. Further, he argued, its expenditures "for the purpose of providing recreation and entertainment to servicemen" were not adequately monitored. He recommended their tax exempt status be revoked retroactively from inception, which officially occurred in February. [28]

USSF funded newspaper Up Against the Bulkhead Up Against the Bulkhead Cover Dec1970.jpg
USSF funded newspaper Up Against the Bulkhead

The Center for Constitutional Rights, a non-profit legal advocacy organization focused on civil liberties, mounted a fierce defense of USSF. It argued among other things that the IRS was attempting to "silence expressions of dissent within the military" and "punish and destroy an organization" which supports "vigorous and colorful expression[s] of First Amendment rights", as well as "[c]hill and deter other tax exempt organizations from engaging in First Amendment activities at odds with government policies". [29] The USSF responded publicly in About Face saying it provided GIs "only a forum; it is the men and women of the military who control and determine the point of view. If they voice dissent and disaffection, we ask that the administration look to itself for the causes." [30]

By mid-1973 the IRS had backed down, dropping its revocation procedure, although according to Lauter it continued to audit the tax returns of USSF staff members, including his own. [13] :p.184 Overall USSF was careful to avoid violating the parameters of their tax exempt status. For example, this was one reason the West Coast offices of USSF kept using the SOS name. As the Oakland office explained it in a 1971 issue of SOS News, "USSF can only contribute to educational activities (i.e. newspapers, films, etc.). They cannot finance 'political' activities, such as demonstrations or staff expenses." SOS, then, would cover the expenses for more political events like Armed Forces Day demonstrations around the country, which they often called "Armed Farces Day" demonstrations. [31]

Other Harassment

USSF and many of the projects and newspapers it supported were often the object of other, sometimes severe, forms of harassment. Lauter, in a letter written to the New York Times , revealed that in March 1971 USSF files had been stolen containing confidential information about the organization's contributors and expenses. He said these "stolen records were then printed in a report of the House Internal Security Committee" while donors and grant recipients were also visited and harassed by the FBI. No official explanation was ever given about how U.S. government agencies obtained this stolen information. [27] [13] :p.184 The UFO antiwar coffeehouse in Columbia, South Carolina, which was the first of its kind and helped USSF get established, had its doors chained shut and its staff arrested by the local police after only a year of operation. At trial, it was fined $10,000 (more than $70,000 today) for "operating and maintaining a public nuisance" and three UFO staff members were sentenced to six years in prison each. City leaders weren't just angry at the antiwar activities, prior to the arrests they made it clear that they were not comfortable with the counterculture atmosphere and interracial gatherings at the UFO. [32] [8] Violence was often directed at coffeehouses and other USSF projects. Seidman states that most coffeehouses had their windows smashed, many repeatedly. He chronicles "Gun shots, fire-bombs and grenades directed toward coffeehouses and their staffers." [10] :p.98 On April 29, 1970, the Green Machine coffeehouse near the Camp Pendleton Marine Corps base was shot up with 45 caliber machine gun fire, wounding one of the marines inside in the shoulder. [1] :p.54 Dr. Levy told the Los Angeles Free Press there was "an enormous amount of repression coming down on the GI movement and the civilians who support that movement." By way of comparison, he went on to say it was "exceeded only by the repression that's coming down on the Black Panthers. [33]

Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund

As mentioned above, the USSF was investigated by the House Committee on Internal Security (now abolished) for possible subversion of the U.S. military. While no subversion was uncovered, one long lasting result of that investigation developed around the subpoena by the Committee of USSF's banking records. The USSF challenged the subpoena and the resulting case, Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund, which made its way to the United States Supreme Court, resulted in a 1975 decision by that court that Congress was within its constitutional powers to issue a subpoena for these records. [34] :p.17 This case was in the news during the presidency of Donald Trump as it was cited as a precedent in the court cases involving the Tax returns of Donald Trump.

Legacy

By the time USSF began to close its doors in late 1973, it had given significant support to the GI antiwar and resistance movements of the late 1960s and early 1970 within the U.S. military. The historian Derek Seidman has called USSF "the broadest and most enduring effort to sustain and expand soldier dissent." In addition to providing logistical and financial support, it helped offer "a coherent narrative and sense of unity for troop dissent and embedded the existence of 'the GI movement' into the public consciousness." It also helped create an alliance between the broad civilian antiwar efforts and the troops who were questioning and resisting the war and the military. [10] :pp.92–93 Historian Richard Moser has argued that USSF "enabled an international network of soldiers and veterans to pursue antiwar work among GIs." [15] :pp.91–92 David L. Parsons, the author of Dangerous Grounds, the only existing non-fiction book to date about the GI coffeehouse movement, says USSF "spent millions of dollars over a period of six years" supporting various GI antiwar and anti-military projects (one million dollars in 1970 would be worth close to eight million today). [4] :p.25 Lauter spoke to how USSF projects helped GIs get "a taste of their own political power", and "perhaps most importantly [learn] a different kind of solidarity from the battlefield". He felt that "new kind of solidarity gave meaning to the phrase 'GI antiwar movement.'" [11] :p.174 Much of this history has been obscured with time, and even covered over with myths like that of Vietnam GIs being spit on by antiwar activists as they returned to the U.S. (for more on this see Myth of the spat-on Vietnam veteran and The Spitting Image ). [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fred Gardner (activist)</span> American political organizer and author

Fred Gardner is an American political organizer and author best known for his opposition to the Vietnam War and his writings about the medical marijuana movement in the United States.

<i>FTA Show</i> 1971 political vaudeville antiwar show

The FTA Show, a play on the common troop expression "Fuck The Army", was a 1971 anti-Vietnam War road show for GIs designed as a response to Bob Hope's patriotic and pro-war USO tour. The idea was first conceived by Howard Levy, an ex-US Army doctor who had just been released from 26 months in Fort Leavenworth military prison for refusing orders to train Green Beret medics on their way to the Vietnam War. Levy convinced actress Jane Fonda who recruited a number of actors, entertainers, musicians and others, including the actors Donald Sutherland, Peter Boyle, Garry Goodrow and Michael Alaimo, comedian and civil rights activist Dick Gregory and soul and R&B singer Swamp Dogg. Alan Myerson, of San Francisco improv comedy group The Committee, agreed to direct, while cartoonist and author Jules Feiffer and playwrights Barbara Garson and Herb Gardner wrote songs and skits for the show. Fred Gardner, the originator of the antiwar GI Coffeehouse movement, became the Tour's "stage manager and liaison to the coffeehouse staffs." At various times other actors, writers, musicians, comedians and entertainers were involved. The United States Servicemen's Fund (USSF), with Dr. Levy as one of its principal organizers, became the official sponsor of the tour. The anti-Vietnam War USSF promoted free speech within the US military, funded and supported independent GI newspapers and coffeehouses, and worked to defend the legal rights of GIs. Sponsorship was later taken over by a group called the Entertainment Industry for Peace & Justice (EIPJ).

<i>Sir! No Sir!</i> 2005 film about anti-Vietnam War soldiers and sailors

Sir! No Sir! is a 2005 documentary by Displaced Films about the anti-war movement within the ranks of the United States Armed Forces during the Vietnam War. The film was produced, directed, and written by David Zeiger. The film had a theatrical run in 80 cities throughout the U.S. and Canada in 2006, and was broadcast worldwide on Sundance Channel, Discovery Channel, BBC, ARTE France, ABC Australia, SBC Spain, ZDF Germany, YLE Finland, RT, and several others.

<i>F.T.A.</i> Documentary about the 1971 anti-Vietnam War FTA Show

F.T.A. is a 1972 American documentary film starring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland and directed by Francine Parker, which follows a 1971 anti-Vietnam War road show for G.I.s, the FTA Show, as it stops in Hawaii, The Philippines, Okinawa, and Japan. It includes highlights from the show, behind the scenes footage, local performers from the countries visited, and interviews and conversations with GIs "as they discuss what they saw in battle, their anger with the military bureaucracy, and their opposition to America's presence in Indochina." Called by Fonda "a spit and a prayer production" it was far from a big budget Hollywood movie, or even a well-funded documentary. While the movie "is raw," it "underscores how infectious the movement of the 60s and 70s was", and chronicles both the Tour itself as well as the soldiers who came to see it and "the local talent of organizers, labor unions and artist/activists" in the countries visited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donald W. Duncan</span> Early U.S. Army opponent of the Vietnam War

Master Sergeant Donald Walter Duncan was a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier who served during the Vietnam War, helping to establish the guerrilla infiltration force Project DELTA there. Following his return to the United States, Duncan became one of the earliest military opponents of the war and one of the antiwar movement's leading public figures. Duncan is best remembered as the cover image on the February 1966 issue of Ramparts where he announced "I quit", as well as for his 1967 book The New Legions and his testimony to the 1967 Russell Tribunal, both of which detailed American war crimes in Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Hood Three</span> Three U.S. Army soldiers who refused to deploy to Vietnam in 1966

The Fort Hood Three were three United States Army soldiers – Private First Class James Johnson, Private David A. Samas, and Private Dennis Mora – who refused to be deployed to fight in the Vietnam War on June 30, 1966. This was the first public refusal of orders to Vietnam, and one of the earliest acts of resistance to the war from within the U.S. military. Their refusal was widely publicized and became a cause célèbre within the growing antiwar movement. They filed a federal suit against Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara and Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor to prevent their shipment to Southeast Asia and were court-martialed by the Army for insubordination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concerned Officers Movement</span> Organization of U.S. military officers opposed to the Vietnam War

The Concerned Officers Movement (COM) was an organization of mainly junior officers formed within the U.S. military in the early 1970s. Though its principal purpose was opposition to the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, it also fought for First Amendment rights within the military. It was initiated in the Washington, D.C. area by commissioned officers who were also Vietnam Veterans, but rapidly expanded throughout all branches and many bases of the U.S. military, ultimately playing an influential role in the opposition to the Vietnam War. At least two of its chapters expanded their ranks to include enlisted personnel (non-officers), in San Diego changing the group's name to Concerned Military, and in Kodiak, Alaska, to Concerned Servicemen's Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI's Against Fascism</span> First antiwar and resistance group within the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam War

GI's Against Fascism was a small but formative organization formed within the United States Navy during the years of conscription and the Vietnam War. The group developed in mid-1969 out of a number of sailors requesting adequate quarters, but coalesced into a formal organization with a wider agenda: a more generalized opposition to the war and to perceived institutional racism within the U.S. Navy. Although there had been earlier antiwar and GI resistance groups within the U.S. Army during the Vietnam era, GI's Against Fascism was the first such group in the U.S. Navy. The group published an underground newspaper called Duck Power as a means of spreading its views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Movement for a Democratic Military</span> Anti-war and GI rights organization during the Vietnam War

The Movement for a Democratic Military (MDM) was an American anti-war, anti-establishment, and military rights organization formed by United States Navy and Marine Corps personnel during the Vietnam War. Formed in California in late 1969 by sailors from Naval Station San Diego in San Diego and Marines from Camp Pendleton Marine Base in Oceanside, it rapidly spread to a number of other cities and bases in California and the Midwest, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Long Beach Naval Station, El Toro Marine Air Station, Fort Ord, Fort Carson, and the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G.I. coffeehouses</span> Antiwar coffeehouses near U.S. military bases during and after the Vietnam War

GI coffeehouses were coffeehouses set up as part of the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War era as a method of fostering antiwar and anti-military sentiment within the U.S. military. They were mainly organized by civilian antiwar activists, though many GIs participated in establishing them as well. They were created in numerous cities and towns near U.S. military bases throughout the U.S as well as Germany and Japan. Due to the normal high turnover rate of GIs at military bases plus the military's response which often involved transfer, discharge and demotion, not to mention the hostility of the pro-military towns where many coffeehouses were located, most of them were short-lived, but a few survived for several years and "contributed to some of the GI movement's most significant actions". The first GI coffeehouse of the Vietnam era was set up in January 1968 and the last closed in 1974. There have been a few additional coffeehouses created during the U.S. led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop Our Ship</span> Campaign of U.S. sailors and civilians against the Vietnam War

The Stop Our Ship (SOS) movement, a component of the overall civilian and GI movements against the Vietnam War, was directed towards and developed on board U.S. Navy ships, particularly aircraft carriers heading to Southeast Asia. It was concentrated on and around major U.S. Naval stations and ships on the West Coast from mid-1970 to the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, and at its height involved tens of thousands of antiwar civilians, military personnel and veterans. It was sparked by the tactical shift of U.S. combat operations in Southeast Asia from the ground to the air. As the ground war stalemated and Army grunts increasingly refused to fight or resisted the war in various other ways, the U.S. “turned increasingly to air bombardment”. By 1972 there were twice as many Seventh Fleet aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Tonkin as previously and the antiwar movement, which was at its height in the U.S. and worldwide, became a significant factor in the Navy. While no ships were actually prevented from returning to war, the campaigns, combined with the broad antiwar and rebellious sentiment of the times, stirred up substantial difficulties for the Navy, including active duty sailors refusing to sail with their ships, circulating petitions and antiwar propaganda on board, disobeying orders, and committing sabotage, as well as persistent civilian antiwar activity in support of dissident sailors. Several ship combat missions were postponed or altered and one ship was delayed by a combination of a civilian blockade and crewmen jumping overboard.

<i>Waging Peace in Vietnam</i> 2019 book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright and Barbara Doherty

Waging Peace in Vietnam: U.S. Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War is a non-fiction book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright, and Barbara Doherty. It was published in September 2019 by New Village Press and is distributed by New York University Press. In March 2023 a Vietnamese language edition of the book was launched at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G.I. movement</span> Movement within the United States military during the Vietnam War

The G.I. movement was the resistance to military involvement in the Vietnam War from active duty soldiers in the United States military. Within the military popular forms of resistance included combat refusals, fragging, and desertion. By the end of the war at least 450 officers were killed in fraggings, or about 250 from 1969–1971, over 300 refused to engage in combat and approximately 50,000 American servicemen deserted. Along with resistance inside the U.S. military, civilians opened up various G.I. coffeehouses near military bases where civilians could meet with soldiers and could discuss and cooperate in the anti-war movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Howard Levy</span> U.S. Army Captain court-martialed for refusing to train soldiers for the Vietnam War

The court-martial of Howard Levy occurred in 1967. Howard Levy was a United States Army doctor who became an early resister to the Vietnam War. In 1967, he was court-martialed at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for refusing an order to train Green Beret medics on their way to Vietnam. He said it "became clear to me that the Army [was using medics] to 'win hearts and minds' in Vietnamese villages - while still burning them to the ground in search-and-destroy missions." He considered the Special Forces "killers of peasants and murderers of women and children".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Susan Schnall</span> U.S. Navy nurse court-martialed for anti-Vietnam War activity

The court-martial of Susan Schnall, a lieutenant U.S. Navy nurse stationed at the Oakland Naval Hospital in Oakland, California, took place in early 1969 during the Vietnam War. Her political activities, which led to the military trial, may have garnered some of the most provocative news coverage during the early days of the U.S. antiwar movement against that war. In October 1968, the San Francisco Chronicle called her the “Peace Leaflet Bomber” for raining tens of thousands of antiwar leaflets from a small airplane over several San Francisco Bay Area military installations and the deck of an aircraft carrier. The day after this “bombing” run, she marched in her officer’s uniform at the front of a large antiwar demonstration, knowing it was against military regulations. While the Navy was court-martialing her for "conduct unbecoming an officer", she was publicly telling the press, "As far as I'm concerned, it's conduct unbecoming to officers to send men to die in Vietnam."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intrepid Four</span> U.S. Sailors who deserted to oppose the Vietnam War

The Intrepid Four were a group of United States Navy deserters who grew to oppose what they called "the American aggression in Vietnam" and publicly deserted from the USS Intrepid in October 1967 as it docked in Japan during the Vietnam War. They were among the first American troops whose desertion was publicly announced during the war and the first within the U.S. Navy. The fact that it was a group, and not just an individual, made it more newsworthy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific Counseling Service</span> Antiwar GI counseling service organization during the Vietnam War

The Pacific Counseling Service (PCS) was a G.I. counseling service organization created by antiwar activists during the Vietnam War. PCS saw itself as trying to make the U.S. Armed Forces "adhere more closely to regulations concerning conscientious objector discharges and G.I. rights." The Armed Forces Journal, on the other hand, said PCS was involved in "antimilitary activities", including "legal help and incitement to dissident GIs." PCS evolved out of a small GI Help office started by a freshly discharged Air Force Sergeant in San Francisco, California in January 1969. The idea rapidly caught on among antiwar forces and within a year PCS had offices in Monterey, Oakland, and San Diego in California, plus Tacoma, Washington. By 1971 it had spread around the Pacific with additional offices in Los Angeles, Hong Kong, Okinawa, the Philippines, as well as Tokyo and Iwakuni in Japan. Each location was established near a major U.S. military base. At its peak, PCS was counseling hundreds of disgruntled soldiers a week, helping many with legal advice, conscientious objector discharges and more. As the war wound down, ending in 1975, the offices closed with the remaining office in San Francisco printing its last underground newspaper in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Lewis Six</span> Six U.S. Army enlisted men courts-martialed for refusing orders to Vietnam in June 1970

The Fort Lewis Six were six U.S. Army enlisted men at the Fort Lewis Army base in the Seattle and Tacoma, Washington area who in June 1970 refused orders to the Vietnam War and were then courts-martialed. They had all applied for conscientious objector status and been turned down by the Pentagon. The Army then ordered them to report for assignment to Vietnam, which they all refused. The Army responded by charging them with "willful disobedience" which carried a maximum penalty of five years at hard labor. The six soldiers were Private First Class Manuel Perez, a Cuban refugee; Private First Class Paul A. Forest, a British citizen from Liverpool; Specialist 4 Carl M. Dix Jr. from Baltimore; Private James B. Allen from Goldsboro, North Carolina; Private First Class Lawrence Galgano from Brooklyn, New York; and Private First Class Jeffrey C. Griffith from Vaughn, Washington. According to the local GI underground newspaper at Fort Lewis, this was the largest mass refusal of direct orders to Vietnam at the base up to that point in the war. Their refusal and subsequent treatment by the Army received national press coverage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI Underground Press</span> Military press produced without official approval or acceptance during the Vietnam War

The GI Underground Press was an underground press movement that emerged among the United States military during the Vietnam War. These were newspapers and newsletters produced without official military approval or acceptance; often furtively distributed under the eyes of "the brass". They were overwhelmingly antiwar and most were anti-military, which tended to infuriate the military command and often resulted in swift retaliation and punishment. Mainly written by rank-and-file active duty or recently discharged GIs, AWOLs and deserters, these publications were intended for their peers and spoke the language and aired the complaints of their audience. They became an integral and powerful element of the larger antiwar, radical and revolutionary movements during those years. This is a history largely ignored and even hidden in the retelling of the U.S. military's role in the Vietnam War.

<i>Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War</i> Non-fiction book about soldier & sailor resistance during the Vietnam War

Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War was the first comprehensive exploration of the disaffection, resistance, rebellion and organized opposition to the Vietnam War within the ranks of the U.S. Armed Forces. It was the first book written by David Cortright, a Vietnam veteran who is currently Professor Emeritus and special adviser for policy studies at the Keough School of Global Affairs and Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame, and the author, co-author, editor or co-editor of 22 books. Originally published as the war was ending in 1975, it was republished in 2005 with an introduction by the well known progressive historian Howard Zinn. Despite being first published 49 years ago, it remains the definitive history of this often ignored subject. The book argues persuasively, with encyclopedic rigor, the still under appreciated fact that by the early 1970s the U.S. armed forces, particularly its ground forces, were essentially breaking down; experiencing a deep crises of moral, discipline and combat effectiveness. Cortright reveals, for example, that in fiscal year 1972, there were more conscientious objectors than draftees, and precipitous declines in both officer enrollments and non-officer enlistments. He also documents "staggering level[s]" of desertions, increasing nearly 400% in the Army from 1966 to 1971. Perhaps more importantly, Cortright makes a convincing case for this unraveling being both a product and an integral part of the anti-Vietnam War sentiment and movement widespread within U.S. society and worldwide at the time. He documents hundreds of GI antiwar and antimilitary organizations, thousands of individual and group acts of resistance, hundreds of GI underground newspapers, and highlights the role of Black GIs militantly fighting racism and the war. This is where the book stands alone as the first and most systematic study of the antiwar and dissident movements impact and growth within the U.S. armed forces during the Vietnam War. While other books, articles and studies have examined this subject, none have done it as thoroughly and systematically.

References

  1. 1 2 Cortright, David (2005). Soldiers In Revolt. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. pp. 53–54. ISBN   1931859272.
  2. Tischler, Barbara L. (1990). "Breaking Ranks: GI Antiwar Newspapers and the Culture of Protest". Vietnam Generation. 2 (1). Retrieved 2021-06-05.
  3. "Introduction to USSF". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. About Face. December 1972.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Parsons, David L. (2017). Dangerous Grounds: Antiwar Coffeehouses and Military Dissent in the Vietnam Era. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN   978-1-4696-3201-8.
  5. Sherman, Edward (1970-05-03). "A System of Law, Tried and Found Guilty: Review of 'Military Justice Is to Justice As Military Music Is to Music' by Robert Sherrill". The New York Times.
  6. Gardner, Fred (1991). "Hollywood Confidential: Part I". The Sixties Project: Viet Nam Generation Journal. Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia at Charlottesville. Retrieved 2020-04-25.
  7. Robinson, Douglas (1968-02-22). "Two at Fort Jackson Face Court-Martial Over War Doubts". The New York Times.
  8. 1 2 Janson, Donald (1968-08-12). "Antiwar Coffeehouses Delight G.I.'s but Not Army". The New York Times.
  9. Franklin, Ben (1969-04-28). "Antiwar G.I.'s and Army Head for Clash Over Vietnam". The New York Times.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Seidman, Derek W. (2005). The Unquiet Americans: GI Dissent During the Vietnam War (PhD). Brown University, Department of History.
  11. 1 2 3 Lauter, Paul (2020). Our Sixties: An Activist's History. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. ISBN   978-1580469906.
  12. "Socially Responsible Investing: Whence Did We Come? And Whither Are We Going?". greenmoney.com. GreenMoney Journal. 2012.
  13. 1 2 3 Carver, Ron; Cortright, David; Doherty, Barbara, eds. (2019). Waging Peace in Vietnam: U.S. Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War. Oakland, CA: New Village Press. ISBN   9781613321072.
  14. Investigation of Attempts to Subvert the United States Armed Services Part 3 at Google Books
  15. 1 2 Moser, Richard (1996). The New Winter Soldiers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. ISBN   9780813522425.
  16. "Jane Fonda F.T.A. February 15, 2020". February 17, 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-12-14 via YouTube. (Describes: meeting Levy on the set of Klute, basing show on G.I anti-war newspapers, 1971 America) Jane Fonda at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood introducing the audience to the anti-Vietnam War documentary "F.T.A." (1972) that she co-starred with Donald Sutherland on Saturday, February 15, 2020. Eleven minutes.
  17. Gardner, Fred (1991). "Hollywood Confidential: Part II". The Sixties Project: Viet Nam Generation Journal. Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia at Charlottesville. Retrieved 2020-04-25.
  18. Greenspun, Roger (1972-07-22). "Jane Fonda's 'F.T.A.' Show Now a Film". The New York Times.
  19. Fonda, Jane (2005). My Life So Far. New York, NY: Random House. ISBN   0375507108.
  20. Goss, Lindsay Evan (2014). Entertaining the Movement: Jane Fonda, GI Resistance, and the FTA (PhD). Brown University. Retrieved 2020-05-01.
  21. King, Sarah (2011). "IV". Jane Fonda's Antiwar Activism and The Myth of Hanoi Jane (PDF) (MA). University of Waterloo. Retrieved 2020-05-14.
  22. "Projects". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. About Face. February 1972.
  23. "About 'About Face'". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. About Face. February 1972.
  24. "Ft Bragg Women's Project". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin. August 1971.
  25. "Project Staffs". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. G.I. News & Discussion Bulletin. January 1972.
  26. Shanahan, Eileen (1974-06-14). "An Explanation: The Allegations Nixon's I.R.S. Interference". The New York Times.
  27. 1 2 Lauter, Paul (1973-07-01). "Politics Behind the I.R.S.". The New York Times - Letters to the Editor.
  28. "Letter from IRS District Director Manhattan to USSF". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Paul Lauter USSF Correspondence. 1973.
  29. "First draft of the proposed complaint for a stay". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Paul Lauter USSF Correspondence. 1973.
  30. "USSF Under Attack by IRS". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. About Face. March 1973.
  31. "SOS News (Oakland, CA)". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Support Our Soldiers. 1971.
  32. Kneeland, Douglas E (1970-06-21). "War Stirs More Dissent Among G.I.s". The New York Times.
  33. Eberle, Paul (1970-05-15). "Dr. Levy On GI Repression". Los Angeles Free Press.
  34. Joint Committee on Congressional Operations: Court Proceedings and Actions of Vital Interest to the Congress at Google Books
  35. Lembcke, Jerry (1998). The Spitting Image. New York, NY: New York University Press. ISBN   0814751466.