Worker representation on corporate boards of directors

Last updated

Worker representation on corporate boards of directors, also known as board-level employee representation (BLER), [1] refers to the right of workers to vote for representatives on a board of directors in corporate law. In 2018, a majority of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and a majority of countries in the European Union, had some form of law guaranteeing the right of workers to vote for board representation. Together with a right to elect work councils, this is often called codetermination.

Contents

The first laws requiring worker voting rights include the Oxford University Act 1854 and the Port of London Act 1908 in the United Kingdom, the Act on Manufacturing Companies of 1919 in Massachusetts in the United States (although the act's provisions were completely voluntary), and the Supervisory Board Act 1922 (Aufsichtsratgesetz 1922) in Germany, which codified collective agreement from 1918 and expanded it in the 1976 Mitbestimmungsgesetz. [2]

Overview

There are three main views as to why codetermination exists: to reduce management-labour conflict by improving and systematizing communication channels; [3] to increase bargaining power of workers at the expense of owners by means of legislation; [4] and to correct market failures by means of public policy. [5] The evidence on "efficiency" is mixed, with codetermination having either no effect or a positive but generally small effect on enterprise performance. [6]

The following is a list of 35 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and their practices of worker representation on corporate boards of directors. [7]

CountryLawMinimum worker representationMinimum number of employees at which law appliesNotes
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria (private companies)Labour Constitution Act 1975 [8] 33.3%300One-third of the supervisory board from 300 employees in private companies; no employee threshold for public limited companies.
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria (public limited companies)33.3%0
Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium N/ANo general law, but some public companies have employee representatives. [9]
Flag of Bulgaria.svg  Bulgaria 0%N/ANo general law, but employees have rights to speak at shareholder general meetings.
Flag of Croatia.svg  Croatia (limited companies)LL 2009 art 166"One"300Employee representative on the supervisory board if the company has over 300 employees (limited companies); no employee threshold for public limited companies
Flag of Croatia.svg  Croatia (public limited companies)"One"0
Flag of Cyprus.svg  Cyprus 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic (private companies)0%N/ANo general law. Before 2014, private companies over 50 employees had one-third employee representation.
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic (state-owned companies)33.3% (may be increased up to 50% voluntarily)1
Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark Companies Act 2010 s 140≤33.3% (two members minimum)35At least two members of the board, up to one-third of the board's membership.
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Finland.svg  Finland Co-operation Act 2021 s 31 [10] 20%150From 150 employees, there must be an agreement on employee representation. If there is none, employee representation automatically defaults to one-fifth of board members.
Flag of France.svg France (private companies)Commercial Code Art. L. 225-79"One" or "Two"1000
(or 5000 worldwide)
Private companies over 1000 employees in France or 5000 worldwide must have at least one or two board members.
Flag of France.svg France (state-owned companies)33.3%1
Flag of Germany.svg Germany Drittelbeteiligungsgesetz 2003 (One-third Participation Act 2004), [11] Mitbestimmungsgesetz 1976 (Codetermination Act 1976), [12] Montanmitbestimmungsgesetz 1951 (Coal and Steel Codetermination Act 1951) [13] 33.3%500Enterprises with over 500 employees must have one-third representation on a supervisory board.
50%2000Enterprises with over 2000 employees must have one-half representation on a supervisory board, but the chair of the supervisory board is a shareholder representative and has a casting vote. In coal and steel companies shareholder representatives do not have a deciding vote.
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece (private companies)0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece (state-owned companies)"One"1
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 33.3%200From 200 employees, one-third of supervisory board members are employees.
Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland (state-owned companies)Workers Participation (State Enterprises) Act, 1977 [14] 33.3%1
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg (private companies)≤33.3%≤1000A third of the board in companies with 1,000 or more employees, up to a third in others
33.3%1000
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg (state-owned companies)33.3%1
Flag of Malta.svg  Malta 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Malta.svg  Malta  ?1For companies owned by unions or the Labour Party.
Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands Works Constitution Act 1971, amended in 2004≤33.3%100
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway Limited Liability Companies Act 1973"One"30-50One director in companies with 30 to 50 employees; one-third of the seats in companies with more than 50, with the possibility of an extra seat in companies with more than 200
33.3%51-200
33.3%+1201
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland (private companies)Law on Workers’ Self Management of 19810%No general law
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland (state-owned companies)33.3%1In state-owned companies employees have one-third of supervisory board seats, and a seat on the management board.
Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal 1976 Constitution, Arts. 30 and 33 and Law 46/79No co-determination, but, in state owned companies, workers have a right to be consulted. In private companies work councils may elect representatives, but the number is determined by the employer.
Flag of Romania.svg  Romania 0%N/ANo general law, but unions can be heard at meetings.
Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia (private companies)Labour Code (Law 311/2001), Art. 233-23633.3% (may be increased up to 50% voluntarily)50
Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia (state-owned companies)50%1Half the supervisory board in state-owned companies.
Flag of Slovenia.svg  Slovenia 1991 Constitution art 75, and 1993 law.50% - 33.3%50Between a third and a half of seats in companies with supervisory board plus management board member if more than 500 employees; around a third in companies with single tier board
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain Law 41/1962, repealed 19800%N/ASome state-owned companies retain two board members though it has not been compulsory since 1980 to have employee representation in private companies.
Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden Board Representation (Private Sector Employees) Act (1987:1245) [15] 33.3%25Over 25 employees, around one-third representation on boards.
Flag of Switzerland (Pantone).svg   Switzerland 0%N/ARepresentation in postal services. No general law, but there was employee representation in railways.
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom Cambridge University Act 1856, [16] National Health Service Act 2006 etc.0%N/ANo general law, except in universities, and in NHS foundation trusts. The Financial Reporting Council has a comply or explain rules for employee representation in the UK Corporate Governance Code
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of the United States.svg  United States 0%N/ANo general law, although in Massachusetts manufacturing firms may voluntarily have employees on boards. Any collective agreement can achieve the same result.
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Israel.svg  Israel (private companies)0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Israel.svg  Israel (state-owned companies)1977 Law and a 1985 High Court decision, Dapey Shituf (Tel-Aviv 1985) ?1Worker representation in government companies
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea 0%N/ANo general law
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 0%N/ANo general law

Canada

During the 2021 federal election, Conservative Party leader Erin O'Toole pledged to require that federally regulated employers with over 1,000 employees or $100 million in annual revenue include worker representation on their boards of directors should he be elected Prime Minister. [17] [18]

China

In China, during the late twentieth century, worker representation on corporate boards of directors was mandated by law for state-owned enterprises and permitted in non-state-owned collectives and companies via "Staff and Worker Representative Congresses" (SWRCs), composed of workers directly elected by all workers in the workplace to represent them. As of the 1980s and 1990s, SWRCs were, in principle, broadly similar to continental European and Japanese workers' workplace councils in terms of rights and powers and consensus building. Research based on interviews in 1997 suggested that in practice, SWRCs did have some real power, including some cases of dismissing managers. [19]

Germany

The first codetermination plans began at companies and through collective agreements. [20] Prior to 1976, German coal and steel producers employing more than 1,000 workers already commonly maintained a board of directors composed of 11 members: five directors came from management, five were workers' representatives, with the eleventh member being neutral. (Note: Boards could be larger as long as the proportion of representation was maintained.) In 1976, the law's scope was expanded to cover all firms employing more than 2,000 workers; with some changes concerning to the board structure, which has an equal number of management and worker representatives, with no neutral members (except in the Mining-and-steel industries where the old law remained in force). The new board's head would represent the firm's owners and had the right to cast the deciding vote in instances of stalemate. (The original law comprising coal-and-steel industries thus remained unchanged in force) [21]

New Zealand

The Companies Empowering Act 1924 [22] allowed companies to issue shares for labour and have them represented by directors, but it was little used, [23] even its chief promoter, Henry Valder, being unable to get his company board to agree to it. [24] It was consolidated into the Companies Act in 1933. [25] The Law Commission recommended its abolition in 1988 for lack of use. [26] The Companies Act 1993 did not allow for labour shares. [27]

United Kingdom

In the UK, the earliest examples of codetermination in management were codified into the Oxford University Act 1854 and the Cambridge University Act 1856. In private enterprise, the Port of London Act 1908 was introduced under Winston Churchill's Board of Trade. [28]

While most enterprises in the UK do not have worker representation, universities there have done so since the 19th century. Generally the more successful the university, the more staff representation on governing bodies:[ citation needed ] Cambridge, [29] Oxford, [30] Edinburgh, Glasgow and other Scottish universities. [31]

United States

Massachusetts has the world's oldest codetermination law that has been continually in force since 1919, although it is voluntary and only for manufacturing companies. [32] [33]

Impact

A 2020 study in the Quarterly Journal of Economics found that codetermination in Germany had no impact on wages, the wage structure, the labor share, revenue, employment or profitability of the firm, but it increased capital investment. [34]

A 2021 study by the Bureau of Economic Research found that "the European model of codetermination is neither a panacea for all of the problems faced by 21st-century workers, nor a destructive institution that is dramatically inferior to shareholder primacy. Rather, as currently implemented, it is a moderate institution with, on net, nonexistent or small positive effects. Board-level and shop-floor worker representation cause at most small increases in wages, possibly lead to slight increases in job security and satisfaction, and have largely zero or small positive effects on firm performance." [35]

History

Some of the first codetermination laws emerged in universities in the UK during the 19th century, such as the Oxford University Act 1854 and the Cambridge University Act 1856. Further acts included the South Metropolitan Gas Act 1896 (59 & 60 Vict. c. ccxxvi) and the Port of London Act 1908. [36] In Germany, there were experiments with worker representation through work councils over the late 19th century, after the first attempts to introduce worker voice by an ex-member of the Frankfurt Parliament named Carl Degenkolb. [37] At the end of World War I, the German trade unions made an historic collective agreement with representatives of German business for full partnership in economic management throughout the country. This was put into the Weimar Constitution article 165, and resulted in a work council law in 1920, [38] and a board representation law in 1922. [39] The fascist government abolished codetermination in 1934, but after World War II, German unions again made collective agreements to resurrect work councils and board representation. These agreements were codified in law in 1951 and 1952. [40]

In most countries around Europe, different forms board representation law spread slowly, especially from the 1970s. In the UK there were repeated experiments from iron and steel [41] to the post office, [42] with worker directors. [43] However, after the Bullock Report of 1977 failed to pass and Margaret Thatcher won the 1979 election, almost all worker participation was ended. [44] Germany recast and extended its laws in 1972 and 1976. [45] The European Commission did propose a Draft Fifth Company Law Directive, but it did not complete passage. In the United States, growing interest in worker "involvement" through Scanlon plans led to unions such as the United Steelworkers at Chrysler, or at United Airlines to negotiate board representation, although usually this was forcibly linked to employee share schemes. Notably, the share scheme at Enron failed in 2003. Almost all modern worker representation laws enable votes without any requirement to invest money. In 2013, France became the largest country to create a modern board representation law to mandate workers with equal rights to all other directors to be on boards.

See also

Notes

  1. Gold, Michael; Waddington, Jeremy (2019-09-01). "Introduction: Board-level employee representation in Europe: State of play". European Journal of Industrial Relations. 25 (3): 205–218. doi:10.1177/0959680119830556. ISSN   0959-6801. S2CID   159358979.
  2. E McGaughey, 'The Codetermination Bargains: The History of German Corporate and Labour Law' (2016) 23(1) Columbia Journal of European Law 135
  3. Prominent views of codetermination have thus been "social" in nature, concerned with expanding democratic participation in new spheres as a good in itself, reducing "alienation", and smoothing management-labour relations to prevent strong conflicts. A collection of views of this nature are found in Magazin Mitbestimmun Archived 2009-08-03 at the Wayback Machine
  4. A conservative economic approach views codetermination as not benign: a political means for transfer of wealth from shareholders to employees and to increase power of political and perhaps union actors; as evidence it is noted firms rarely adopt codetermination voluntarily: see Pejovich, Svetozar. The economics of property rights: towards a theory of comparative systems. Chapter 8. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic, 1990.
  5. Another economist argues that codetermination in effect corrects several market failures so lack of voluntary adoption cannot be viewed as evidence that codetermination is inefficient: see Stephen C. Smith, "On the economic rationale for codetermination law", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, Vol. 16 (December 1991), pp. 261-281.
  6. For example see Felix R. Fitzroy and Kornelius Kraft, "Co-determination, efficiency and productivity", British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 2 (June 2005), pp. 233-247.
  7. See worker-participation.eu and Z Adams, L Bishop and S Deakin, CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries) (Cambridge: Centre for Business Research 2016))
  8. "Federal Act on the Labour Constitution and freedom of association (BGBl. 1974/22). Text 9" (PDF). Rechtsinformationssystem (RIS). Retrieved 2021-03-10.
  9. See I Ferreras, Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy through Economic Bicameralism (2017)
  10. "Co-operation Act (1333/2021)" (PDF). Government of Finland. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
  11. "DrittelbG - Gesetz über die Drittelbeteiligung der Arbeitnehmer im Aufsichtsrat". www.gesetze-im-internet.de. Retrieved 2021-03-25.
  12. "MitbestG - Gesetz über die Mitbestimmung der Arbeitnehmer". www.gesetze-im-internet.de. Retrieved 2021-03-25.
  13. "MontanMitbestG - nichtamtliches Inhaltsverzeichnis". www.gesetze-im-internet.de. Retrieved 2021-03-25.
  14. "Worker Participation (State Enterprises) Act, 1977". electronic Irish Statute Book (eISB). Retrieved 2021-03-10.
  15. "Board Representation (Private Sector Employees) Act". Government of Sweden. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
  16. "Cambridge University Act 1856". Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 2021-03-30.
  17. "Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole to ensure Canadian workers have their voices heard". 23 August 2021.
  18. Rendell, Mark (23 August 2021). "Conservatives pledge worker representation on boards, but union leaders remain skeptical about shift in approach". The Globe and Mail.
  19. Xiaoyang, Zhu; Chan, Anita (2005). "Staff and Workers' Representative Congress" (PDF). Chinese Sociology and Anthropology . 37: 6–33. doi:10.1080/21620555.2005.11038349. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-13.
  20. E McGaughey, 'The Codetermination Bargains: The History of German Corporate and Labour Law' (2016) 23(1) Columbia Journal of European Law 135, page 22
  21. "MontanMitbestG - Gesetz über die Mitbestimmung der Arbeitnehmer in den Aufsichtsräten und Vorständen der Unternehmen des Bergbaus und der Eisen und Stahl erzeugenden Industrie" . Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  22. "Companies Empowering Act 1924 (15 GEO V 1924 No 52)". www.nzlii.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  23. Parliament, New Zealand (1986). Parliamentary Debates. House of Representatives.
  24. Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu. "Valder, Henry". teara.govt.nz. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  25. "Companies Act 1933" (PDF).
  26. "Preliminary Paper No. 5 COMPANY LAW A discussion paper" (PDF). 1988.
  27. "Companies Act 1993 (1993 No 105)". www.nzlii.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  28. E McGaughey, 'Votes at work in Britain: shareholder monopolisation and the ‘single channel’ (2018) 47(1) Industrial Law Journal 76, page 9.
  29. Cambridge University Act 1856
  30. Oxford University Act 1854
  31. Higher Education Governance (Scotland) Act 2016 ss 10-11
  32. "An Act To Enable Manufacturing Corporations To Provide For The Representation Of Their Employees On The Board Of Directors", General Acts of 1919, chapter 70, page 45, approved 3 April 1919.
  33. E McGaughey, 'Democracy in America at Work: The History of Labor's Vote in Corporate Governance' (2019) 42 Seattle University Law Review 697
  34. Jäger, Simon; Schoefer, Benjamin; Heining, Jörg (2020). "Labor in the Boardroom". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 136 (2): 669–725. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjaa038 .
  35. Jäger, Simon; Noy, shakked; Schoefer, Benjamin (2021). "What Does Codetermination do?". NBER Working Paper Series. doi: 10.3386/w28921 . S2CID   235706486. working paper 28921.
  36. E McGaughey, 'Votes at Work in Britain: Shareholder Monopolisation and the ‘Single Channel’' (2017) 46(4) Industrial Law Journal 444. See also JS Mill, Principles of Political Economy (1870) discussing, albeit very different, Henry Briggs & Son Co, incorporated 1865, which had an employee share plan and a worker director. South Metropolitan Gas Act 1896 extract in the London Gazette, abolished by the Gas Act 1948.
  37. HJ Teuteberg, ‘Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der ersten betrieblichen Arbeitervertretungen in Deutschland’ (1960) 11 Soziale Welt 69. See the Arbeitsverordnung 1890, the first law enabling worker councils, but only on a voluntary basis. The Hilfsdienstgesetz 1916 was a war time requirement for worker councils in some industries.
  38. Betriebsrätegesetz 1920
  39. Aufsichtsratsgesetz 1922. E McGaughey, 'The Codetermination Bargains: The History of German Corporate and Labour Law' (2016) 23(1) Columbia Journal of European Law 135
  40. E McGaughey, 'The Codetermination Bargains: The History of German Corporate and Labour Law' (2016) 23(1) Columbia Journal of European Law 135. See the Montan-mitbestimmungsgesetz 1951, the Betriesbrätegesetz 1952 and the Mitbestimmungsergänzungsgesetz 1956.
  41. Iron and Steel Act 1967 Sch 4, Part V, created a negotiation process with trade unions in British Steel Corporation to introduce workers, put into effect from 1968. For its implementation, see: Bank, John, and Jones, Ken, Worker Directors Speak: The British Steel Corporation Employee Directors (Gower Press, Farnborough, 1977)
  42. Post Office Act 1977 s 1(2) created worker directors for the Post Office by amending the Post Office Act 1969.
  43. The Transport Act 1968 allowed the secretary of state to appoint members of the British Railways Board. In 1997, John Prescott appointed a worker director overseeing some aspects of the now privatised industry.
  44. Transport Act 1985, privatised the bus networks. Employee share ownership plans were created by Labour councils as this happened, as a way to protect workers, though shares were quickly bought up by ordinary business owners.
  45. The Betriebsverfassungsgesetz 1972, standardised law for one third employees on company boards with over 500 staff. The Codetermination Act 1976 required one half in large companies, but with the upper hand for shareholders. Now, the Drittelbeteiligungsgesetz 2004, BGBl. I S. 974, in German codified again, one third worker directors in companies with over 500 staff.

Related Research Articles

A works council is a shop-floor organization representing workers that functions as a local/firm-level complement to trade unions but is independent of these at least in some countries. Works councils exist with different names in a variety of related forms in a number of European countries, including Great Britain ; Germany and Austria (Betriebsrat); Luxembourg ; the Netherlands and Flanders in Belgium (ondernemingsraad); Italy ; France ; Wallonia in Belgium, Spain and Denmark.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States labor law</span> US laws on fair pay and conditions, unions, democracy, equality and security at work

United States labor law sets the rights and duties for employees, labor unions, and employers in the US. Labor law's basic aim is to remedy the "inequality of bargaining power" between employees and employers, especially employers "organized in the corporate or other forms of ownership association". Over the 20th century, federal law created minimum social and economic rights, and encouraged state laws to go beyond the minimum to favor employees. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 requires a federal minimum wage, currently $7.25 but higher in 29 states and D.C., and discourages working weeks over 40 hours through time-and-a-half overtime pay. There are no federal laws, and few state laws, requiring paid holidays or paid family leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 creates a limited right to 12 weeks of unpaid leave in larger employers. There is no automatic right to an occupational pension beyond federally guaranteed Social Security, but the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 requires standards of prudent management and good governance if employers agree to provide pensions, health plans or other benefits. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employees have a safe system of work.

The National Labor Board (NLB) was an independent agency of the United States Government established on August 5, 1933, to handle labor disputes arising under the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA).

Trade unions in Germany have a history reaching back to the German revolution in 1848, and still play an important role in the German economy and society.

The UK Corporate Governance code, formerly known as the Combined Code is a part of UK company law with a set of principles of good corporate governance aimed at companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is overseen by the Financial Reporting Council and its importance derives from the Financial Conduct Authority's Listing Rules. The Listing Rules themselves are given statutory authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and require that public listed companies disclose how they have complied with the code, and explain where they have not applied the code – in what the code refers to as 'comply or explain'. Private companies are also encouraged to conform; however there is no requirement for disclosure of compliance in private company accounts. The Code adopts a principles-based approach in the sense that it provides general guidelines of best practice. This contrasts with a rules-based approach which rigidly defines exact provisions that must be adhered to. In 2017, it was announced that the Financial Reporting Council would amend the Code to require companies to "comply or explain" with a requirement to have elected employee representatives on company boards.

Codetermination in Germany is a concept that involves the right of workers to participate in management of the companies they work for. Known as Mitbestimmung, the modern law on codetermination is found principally in the Mitbestimmungsgesetz of 1976. The law allows workers to elect representatives for almost half of the supervisory board of directors. The legislation is separate from the main German company law Act for public companies, the Aktiengesetz. It applies to public and private companies, so long as there are over 2,000 employees. For companies with 500–2,000 employees, one third of the supervisory board must be elected.

Mitbestimmungsgesetz 1976 or the Codetermination Act 1976 is a German law that requires companies of over 2000 employees to have half the supervisory board of directors as representatives of workers, and just under half the votes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States corporate law</span> Overview of United States corporate law

United States corporate law regulates the governance, finance and power of corporations in US law. Every state and territory has its own basic corporate code, while federal law creates minimum standards for trade in company shares and governance rights, found mostly in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by laws like the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The US Constitution was interpreted by the US Supreme Court to allow corporations to incorporate in the state of their choice, regardless of where their headquarters are. Over the 20th century, most major corporations incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law, which offered lower corporate taxes, fewer shareholder rights against directors, and developed a specialized court and legal profession. Nevada has attempted to do the same. Twenty-four states follow the Model Business Corporation Act, while New York and California are important due to their size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">German company law</span>

German company law (Gesellschaftsrecht) is an influential legal regime for companies in Germany. The primary form of company is the public company or Aktiengesellschaft (AG). A private company with limited liability is known as a Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH). A partnership is called a Kommanditgesellschaft (KG).

German labour law refers to the regulation of employment relationships and industrial partnerships in Germany.

The Report of the committee of inquiry on industrial democracy (1977) Cmnd 6706, also the Bullock Report for short, was a report proposing for a form of worker participation or workers' control, chaired by Alan Bullock. The idea was seen by some as a way to solve the chronic industrial disputes and to enhance participation of employees in their workplace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workplace participation in the United Kingdom</span>

Workplace participation in the United Kingdom refers to the structures that people at work have to participate in the way their organisation is managed. UK labour and company law generally leaves this up to the management of the company, appointed by shareholders and banks, to determine, and in contrast to most European jurisdictions requires only a minimum participation practices. Workers have the right to,

Industrial democracy is an arrangement which involves workers making decisions, sharing responsibility and authority in the workplace. While in participative management organizational designs workers are listened to and take part in the decision-making process, in organizations employing industrial democracy they also have the final decisive power.

Hans Jürgen Teuteberg was a German historian, who worked as a professor of social and economic history at the University of Münster from 1974 to 1995.

Control Council Law No 22, Works Councils was a German labour law drafted by the Allied Control Council to enable the formation of work councils in rebuilding the economy and society after World War II. Work councils, which employees of a firm organised and elected democratically to determine workplace issues, had existed in Germany in various forms since 1889. They had been abolished by Adolf Hitler's Nazi party. The new Control Council Law No 22 provided a template for democratic German trade unions to re-organise through collective agreements with employers.

Erzberger v TUI AG (2017) C-566/15 is an EU law and European labour law case, concerning the scope of free movement of workers, in relation to codetermination.

The Reward Work Act of 2018 is a proposed United States Act of Congress to ban unjustified stock buy-backs, and to require that every listed company enable employees to elect one-third of the board of directors. The Bill was sponsored initially by Senators Tammy Baldwin, Elizabeth Warren and Brian Schatz in March 2018, joined in April 2018 by Kirsten Gillibrand, and in November 2018 by Bernie Sanders. It was sponsored in the House of Representatives in June 2018 by Keith Ellison and Ro Khanna.

The Accountable Capitalism Act, 115th Congress (2017–18) S. 3348 is a proposed federal bill introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren in August 2018. It would require any company with revenue over $1 billion to obtain a federal corporate charter. For these companies, employees would elect 40% of the board of directors and a 75% vote of shareholders and directors would be required to approve any political spending. The Act contains a "constituency statute" that would give directors a duty of "creating a general public benefit" with regard to a corporation's stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, and the environment, and the interests of the enterprise in the long-term.

The Works Constitution Act, abbreviated BetrVG, is a German federal law governing the right of employees to form a works council.

The cloud software company SAP employs 22,000 people globally. Employees in Germany have been represented by a works council since 2006, as well as employee/trade union representatives in the Supervisory Board. Employees in Israel are unionised with Histadrut.

References

Articles
Books
Reports
EU Draft Fifth Company Law Directive