Zeeman slower

Last updated August 18, 2024

In atomic physics, a Zeeman slower is a scientific instrument that is commonly used in atomic physics to slow and cool a beam of hot atoms to speeds of several meters per second and temperatures below a kelvin. The gas-phase atoms used in atomic physics are often generated in an oven by heating a solid or liquid atomic sample to temperatures where the vapor pressure is high enough that a substantial number of atoms are in the gas phase. These atoms effuse out of a hole in the oven with average speeds on the order of hundreds of m/s and large velocity distributions (due to their high temperature). The Zeeman slower is attached close to where the hot atoms exit the oven and are used to slow them to less than 10 m/s (slowing) with a very small velocity spread (cooling).

A Zeeman slower consists of a cylinder, through which an atomic beam travels, a pump laser that counterpropagates with respect to the beam's direction, and a magnetic field (commonly produced by a solenoid-like coil) that points along the cylinder's axis with a spatially varying magnitude. The pump laser, which is required to be near-resonant with atomic transition, Doppler slows a certain velocity class within the velocity distribution of the beam. The spatially-varying magnetic field is designed to Zeeman shift the resonant frequency to match the decreasing Doppler shift as the atoms are slowed to lower velocities while they propagate through the Zeeman slower allowing the pump laser to be continuously resonant and provide a slowing force.

History

The Zeeman slower was first developed by Harold J. Metcalf and William D. Phillips (who was awarded 1/3 of the 1997 Nobel Prize in Physics in part work for his work on the Zeeman slower ^[1]).^[2] The achievement of these low temperatures led the way for the experimental realization of Bose–Einstein condensation, and a Zeeman slower can be part of such an apparatus.

Principle

According to the principles of Doppler cooling, an atom modelled as a two-level atom can be cooled using a laser. If it moves in a specific direction and encounters a counter-propagating laser beam resonant with its transition, it is very likely to absorb a photon. The absorption of this photon gives the atom a "kick" in the direction that is consistent with momentum conservation and brings the atom to its excited state. However, this state is unstable and some time later the atom decays back to its ground state via spontaneous emission (after a time on the order of nanoseconds, for example in Rubidium 87 the excited state of the D2 transition has a lifetime of 26.2 ns^[3]). The photon will be reemitted (and the atom will again increase its speed), but its direction will be random. When averaging over a large number of these processes applied to one atom, one sees that the absorption process decreases the speed always in the same direction (as the absorbed photon comes from a monodirectional source), whereas the emission process does not lead to any change in the speed of the atom because the emission direction is random. Thus the atom is being effectively slowed down by the laser beam.

There is nevertheless a problem in this basic scheme because of the Doppler effect. The resonance of the atom is rather narrow (on the order of a few megaHertz), and after having decreased its momentum by a few recoil momenta, it is no longer in resonance with the pump beam because in its frame, the frequency of the laser has shifted. The Zeeman slower^[4] uses the fact that a magnetic field can change the resonance frequency of an atom using the Zeeman effect to tackle this problem.

The average acceleration (due to many photon absorption events over time) of an atom with mass, $M$ , a cycling transition with frequency, $\omega =ck+\delta$ , and linewidth, $\gamma$ , that is in the presence of a laser beam that has wavenumber, $k$ , and intensity $I=s_{0}I_{s}$ (where $I_{s}=\hbar c\gamma k^{3}/12\pi$ is the saturation intensity of the laser) is

{\vec {a}}={\frac {\hbar {\vec {k}}\gamma }{2M}}{\frac {s_{0}}{1+s_{0}+\left(2\delta '/\gamma \right)^{2}}}

In the rest frame of the atoms with velocity, $v$ , in the atomic beam, the frequency of the laser beam is shifted by $k_{L}v$ . In the presence of a magnetic field $B$ , the atomic transition is Zeeman shifted by an amount $\mu 'B/\hbar$ (where $\mu '$ is the magnetic moment of the transition). Thus, the effective detuning of the laser from the zero-field resonant frequency of the atoms is

\delta '=\delta +kv-{\frac {\mu 'B}{\hbar }}

The atoms for which $\delta '=0$ will experience the largest acceleration, namely

a=\eta a_{\text{max}}

where $\eta =s_{0}/(1+s_{0})$ and $a_{\text{max}}={\frac {\hbar k\gamma }{2M}}$ .

The most common approach is to require that we have a magnetic field profile that varies in the $z$ direction such that the atoms experience a constant acceleration $a=\eta a_{\text{max}}$ as they fly along the axis of the slower. It has been recently shown however, that a different approach yields better results.^[5]

In the constant deceleration approach we get:

v\left(z\right)={\sqrt {v_{i}^{2}-2az}}

B\left(z\right)={\frac {\hbar k}{\mu '}}v+{\frac {\hbar \delta }{\mu '}}={\frac {\hbar kv_{i}}{\mu '}}{\sqrt {1-{\frac {2a}{v_{i}^{2}}}z}}+{\frac {\hbar \delta }{\mu '}}

where $v_{i}$ is the maximum velocity class that will be slowed; all the atoms in the velocity distribution that have velocities $v<v_{i}$ will be slowed, and those with velocities $v>v_{i}$ will not be slowed at all. The parameter $\eta$ (which determines the required laser intensity) is normally chosen to be around .5. If a Zeeman slower were to be operated with $\eta \approx 1$ , then after absorbing a photon and moving to the excited state, the atom would then preferentially re-emit a photon in the direction of the laser beam (due to stimulated emission) which would counteract the slowing process.

Realization

The required form of the spatially inhomogeneous magnetic field as we showed above has the form

B(z)=B_{0}+B_{a}{\sqrt {1-z/z_{0}}}

This field can be realized a few different ways. The most popular design requires wrapping a current carrying wire with many layered windings where the field is strongest (around 20-50 windings) and few windings where the field is weak. Alternative designs include: a single layer coil that varies in the pitch of the winding,^[6] an array of permanent magnets in various configurations.^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]

Outgoing atoms

The Zeeman slower is usually used as a preliminary step to cool the atoms in order to trap them in a magneto-optical trap. Thus it aims at a final velocity of about 10 m/s (depending on the atom used), starting with a beam of atoms with a velocity of a few hundred meters per second. The final speed to be reached is a compromise between the technical difficulty of having a long Zeeman slower and the maximal speed allowed for an efficient loading into the trap.

A limitation of setup can be the transverse heating of the beam.^[11] It is linked to the fluctuations of the speed along the three axis around its mean values, since the final speed was said to be an average over a large number of processes. These fluctuations are linked to the atom having a Brownian motion due to the random reemission of the absorbed photon. They may cause difficulties when loading the atoms in the next trap.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeeman effect</span> Spectral line splitting in magnetic field

The Zeeman effect is the effect of splitting of a spectral line into several components in the presence of a static magnetic field. It is named after the Dutch physicist Pieter Zeeman, who discovered it in 1896 and received a Nobel prize for this discovery. It is analogous to the Stark effect, the splitting of a spectral line into several components in the presence of an electric field. Also similar to the Stark effect, transitions between different components have, in general, different intensities, with some being entirely forbidden, as governed by the selection rules.

In atomic physics, hyperfine structure is defined by small shifts in otherwise degenerate electronic energy levels and the resulting splittings in those electronic energy levels of atoms, molecules, and ions, due to electromagnetic multipole interaction between the nucleus and electron clouds.

In physics, the Rabi cycle is the cyclic behaviour of a two-level quantum system in the presence of an oscillatory driving field. A great variety of physical processes belonging to the areas of quantum computing, condensed matter, atomic and molecular physics, and nuclear and particle physics can be conveniently studied in terms of two-level quantum mechanical systems, and exhibit Rabi flopping when coupled to an optical driving field. The effect is important in quantum optics, magnetic resonance and quantum computing, and is named after Isidor Isaac Rabi.

In physics and chemistry, the spin quantum number is a quantum number that describes the intrinsic angular momentum of an electron or other particle. It has the same value for all particles of the same type, such as $s$ = ⁠1/2⁠ for all electrons. It is an integer for all bosons, such as photons, and a half-odd-integer for all fermions, such as electrons and protons.

In magnetism, the Curie–Weiss law describes the magnetic susceptibility $χ$ of a ferromagnet in the paramagnetic region above the Curie temperature:

In atomic physics, the electron magnetic moment, or more specifically the electron magnetic dipole moment, is the magnetic moment of an electron resulting from its intrinsic properties of spin and electric charge. The value of the electron magnetic moment is −9.2847646917(29)×10⁻²⁴ J⋅T⁻¹.‍ In units of the Bohr magneton (μ_B), it is −1.00115965218059(13) μ_B, a value that was measured with a relative accuracy of 1.3×10⁻¹³.

In quantum physics, the spin–orbit interaction is a relativistic interaction of a particle's spin with its motion inside a potential. A key example of this phenomenon is the spin–orbit interaction leading to shifts in an electron's atomic energy levels, due to electromagnetic interaction between the electron's magnetic dipole, its orbital motion, and the electrostatic field of the positively charged nucleus. This phenomenon is detectable as a splitting of spectral lines, which can be thought of as a Zeeman effect product of two relativistic effects: the apparent magnetic field seen from the electron perspective and the magnetic moment of the electron associated with its intrinsic spin. A similar effect, due to the relationship between angular momentum and the strong nuclear force, occurs for protons and neutrons moving inside the nucleus, leading to a shift in their energy levels in the nucleus shell model. In the field of spintronics, spin–orbit effects for electrons in semiconductors and other materials are explored for technological applications. The spin–orbit interaction is at the origin of magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the spin Hall effect.

In atomic, molecular, and optical physics, a magneto-optical trap (MOT) is an apparatus which uses laser cooling and a spatially-varying magnetic field to create a trap which can produce samples of cold, neutral atoms. Temperatures achieved in a MOT can be as low as several microkelvin, depending on the atomic species, which is two or three times below the photon recoil limit. However, for atoms with an unresolved hyperfine structure, such as ⁷Li, the temperature achieved in a MOT will be higher than the Doppler cooling limit.

The Gross–Pitaevskii equation describes the ground state of a quantum system of identical bosons using the Hartree–Fock approximation and the pseudopotential interaction model.

Resonance fluorescence is the process in which a two-level atom system interacts with the quantum electromagnetic field if the field is driven at a frequency near to the natural frequency of the atom.

The Kapitza–Dirac effect is a quantum mechanical effect consisting of the diffraction of matter by a standing wave of light. The effect was first predicted as the diffraction of electrons from a standing wave of light by Paul Dirac and Pyotr Kapitsa in 1933. The effect relies on the wave–particle duality of matter as stated by the de Broglie hypothesis in 1924.

Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, and thus by composite particles such as hadrons, atomic nuclei, and atoms. Spin is quantized, and accurate models for the interaction with spin require relativistic quantum mechanics or quantum field theory.

Surface-extended X-ray absorption fine structure (SEXAFS) is the surface-sensitive equivalent of the EXAFS technique. This technique involves the illumination of the sample by high-intensity X-ray beams from a synchrotron and monitoring their photoabsorption by detecting in the intensity of Auger electrons as a function of the incident photon energy. Surface sensitivity is achieved by the interpretation of data depending on the intensity of the Auger electrons instead of looking at the relative absorption of the X-rays as in the parent method, EXAFS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sisyphus cooling</span> Type of laser cooling

In ultra-low-temperature physics, Sisyphus cooling, the Sisyphus effect, or polarization gradient cooling involves the use of specially selected laser light, hitting atoms from various angles to both cool and trap them in a potential well, effectively rolling the atom down a hill of potential energy until it has lost its kinetic energy. It is a type of laser cooling of atoms used to reach temperatures below the Doppler cooling limit. This cooling method was first proposed by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji in 1989, motivated by earlier experiments which observed sodium atoms cooled below the Doppler limit in an optical molasses. Cohen-Tannoudji received part of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997 for his work. The technique is named after Sisyphus, a figure in the Greek mythology who was doomed, for all eternity, to roll a stone up a mountain only to have it roll down again whenever he got it near the summit.

The quantization of the electromagnetic field is a procedure in physics turning Maxwell's classical electromagnetic waves into particles called photons. Photons are massless particles of definite energy, definite momentum, and definite spin.

Ramsey interferometry, also known as the separated oscillating fields method, is a form of particle interferometry that uses the phenomenon of magnetic resonance to measure transition frequencies of particles. It was developed in 1949 by Norman Ramsey, who built upon the ideas of his mentor, Isidor Isaac Rabi, who initially developed a technique for measuring particle transition frequencies. Ramsey's method is used today in atomic clocks and in the SI definition of the second. Most precision atomic measurements, such as modern atom interferometers and quantum logic gates, have a Ramsey-type configuration. A more modern method, known as Ramsey–Bordé interferometry uses a Ramsey configuration and was developed by French physicist Christian Bordé and is known as the Ramsey–Bordé interferometer. Bordé's main idea was to use atomic recoil to create a beam splitter of different geometries for an atom-wave. The Ramsey–Bordé interferometer specifically uses two pairs of counter-propagating interaction waves, and another method named the "photon-echo" uses two co-propagating pairs of interaction waves.

In quantum mechanics, magnetic resonance is a resonant effect that can appear when a magnetic dipole is exposed to a static magnetic field and perturbed with another, oscillating electromagnetic field. Due to the static field, the dipole can assume a number of discrete energy eigenstates, depending on the value of its angular momentum (azimuthal) quantum number. The oscillating field can then make the dipole transit between its energy states with a certain probability and at a certain rate. The overall transition probability will depend on the field's frequency and the rate will depend on its amplitude. When the frequency of that field leads to the maximum possible transition probability between two states, a magnetic resonance has been achieved. In that case, the energy of the photons composing the oscillating field matches the energy difference between said states. If the dipole is tickled with a field oscillating far from resonance, it is unlikely to transition. That is analogous to other resonant effects, such as with the forced harmonic oscillator. The periodic transition between the different states is called Rabi cycle and the rate at which that happens is called Rabi frequency. The Rabi frequency should not be confused with the field's own frequency. Since many atomic nuclei species can behave as a magnetic dipole, this resonance technique is the basis of nuclear magnetic resonance, including nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Electric dipole spin resonance (EDSR) is a method to control the magnetic moments inside a material using quantum mechanical effects like the spin–orbit interaction. Mainly, EDSR allows to flip the orientation of the magnetic moments through the use of electromagnetic radiation at resonant frequencies. EDSR was first proposed by Emmanuel Rashba.

In condensed matter and atomic physics, Van Vleck paramagnetism refers to a positive and temperature-independent contribution to the magnetic susceptibility of a material, derived from second order corrections to the Zeeman interaction. The quantum mechanical theory was developed by John Hasbrouck Van Vleck between the 1920s and the 1930s to explain the magnetic response of gaseous nitric oxide and of rare-earth salts. Alongside other magnetic effects like Paul Langevin's formulas for paramagnetism and diamagnetism, Van Vleck discovered an additional paramagnetic contribution of the same order as Langevin's diamagnetism. Van Vleck contribution is usually important for systems with one electron short of being half filled and this contribution vanishes for elements with closed shells.

Polarization gradient cooling is a technique in laser cooling of atoms. It was proposed to explain the experimental observation of cooling below the doppler limit. Shortly after the theory was introduced experiments were performed that verified the theoretical predictions. While Doppler cooling allows atoms to be cooled to hundreds of microkelvin, PG cooling allows atoms to be cooled to a few microkelvin or less.

References

↑ Nobel prize in physics press release, 1997
↑ Phillips, William D.; Metcalf, Harold (1982-03-01). "Laser Deceleration of an Atomic Beam". Physical Review Letters. 48 (9). American Physical Society (APS): 596–599. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48..596P. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.48.596 . ISSN 0031-9007.
↑ Alkali D line Data, D. A. Steck
↑ Bill Phillips' Nobel lecture
↑ B Ohayon., G Ron. (2013). "New approaches in designing a Zeeman Slower". Journal of Instrumentation. 8 (2): 02016. arXiv: 1212.2109 . Bibcode:2013JInst...8P2016O. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/02/P02016. S2CID 250665222.
↑ Bell, S. C.; Junker, M.; Jasperse, M.; Turner, L. D.; Lin, Y.-J.; Spielman, I. B.; Scholten, R. E. (2010). "A slow atom source using a collimated effusive oven and a single-layer variable pitch coil Zeeman slower". Review of Scientific Instruments. 81 (1). AIP Publishing: 013105–013105–7. Bibcode:2010RScI...81a3105B. doi:10.1063/1.3276712. ISSN 0034-6748. PMID 20113079.
↑ Cheiney, P; Carraz, O; Bartoszek-Bober, D; Faure, S; Vermersch, F; Fabre, C. M; Gattobigio, G. L; Lahaye, T; Guéry-Odelin, D; Mathevet, R (2011). "A Zeeman slower design with permanent magnets in a Halbach configuration". Review of Scientific Instruments. 82 (6): 063115–063115–7. arXiv: 1101.3243 . Bibcode:2011RScI...82f3115C. doi:10.1063/1.3600897. PMID 21721682. S2CID 29345065.
↑ Reinaudi, G.; Osborn, C. B.; Bega, K.; Zelevinsky, T. (2012-03-20). "Dynamically configurable and optimizable Zeeman slower using permanent magnets and servomotors". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 29 (4): 729. arXiv: 1110.5351 . Bibcode:2012JOSAB..29..729R. doi:10.1364/josab.29.000729. ISSN 0740-3224. S2CID 118444756.
↑ Lebedev, V; Weld, D M (2014-07-28). "Self-assembled Zeeman slower based on spherical permanent magnets". Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 47 (15): 155003. arXiv: 1407.5372 . Bibcode:2014JPhB...47o5003L. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/15/155003. ISSN 0953-4075. S2CID 119234963.
↑ Krzyzewski, S. P.; Akin, T. G.; Dahal, Parshuram; Abraham, E. R. I. (October 2014). "A clip-on Zeeman slower using toroidal permanent magnets". Review of Scientific Instruments. 85 (10): 103104. Bibcode:2014RScI...85j3104K. doi:10.1063/1.4897151. ISSN 0034-6748. PMID 25362368. S2CID 30494084.
↑ K. Günter Design and implementation of a Zeeman slower for Rb 87

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Nobel prize in physics press release, 1997

[2] Phillips, William D.; Metcalf, Harold (1982-03-01). "Laser Deceleration of an Atomic Beam". Physical Review Letters. 48 (9). American Physical Society (APS): 596–599. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48..596P. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.48.596 . ISSN 0031-9007.

[3] Alkali D line Data, D. A. Steck

[4] Bill Phillips' Nobel lecture

[5] B Ohayon., G Ron. (2013). "New approaches in designing a Zeeman Slower". Journal of Instrumentation. 8 (2): 02016. arXiv: 1212.2109 . Bibcode:2013JInst...8P2016O. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/02/P02016. S2CID 250665222.

[6] Bell, S. C.; Junker, M.; Jasperse, M.; Turner, L. D.; Lin, Y.-J.; Spielman, I. B.; Scholten, R. E. (2010). "A slow atom source using a collimated effusive oven and a single-layer variable pitch coil Zeeman slower". Review of Scientific Instruments. 81 (1). AIP Publishing: 013105–013105–7. Bibcode:2010RScI...81a3105B. doi:10.1063/1.3276712. ISSN 0034-6748. PMID 20113079.

[7] Cheiney, P; Carraz, O; Bartoszek-Bober, D; Faure, S; Vermersch, F; Fabre, C. M; Gattobigio, G. L; Lahaye, T; Guéry-Odelin, D; Mathevet, R (2011). "A Zeeman slower design with permanent magnets in a Halbach configuration". Review of Scientific Instruments. 82 (6): 063115–063115–7. arXiv: 1101.3243 . Bibcode:2011RScI...82f3115C. doi:10.1063/1.3600897. PMID 21721682. S2CID 29345065.

[8] Reinaudi, G.; Osborn, C. B.; Bega, K.; Zelevinsky, T. (2012-03-20). "Dynamically configurable and optimizable Zeeman slower using permanent magnets and servomotors". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 29 (4): 729. arXiv: 1110.5351 . Bibcode:2012JOSAB..29..729R. doi:10.1364/josab.29.000729. ISSN 0740-3224. S2CID 118444756.

[9] Lebedev, V; Weld, D M (2014-07-28). "Self-assembled Zeeman slower based on spherical permanent magnets". Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 47 (15): 155003. arXiv: 1407.5372 . Bibcode:2014JPhB...47o5003L. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/15/155003. ISSN 0953-4075. S2CID 119234963.

[10] Krzyzewski, S. P.; Akin, T. G.; Dahal, Parshuram; Abraham, E. R. I. (October 2014). "A clip-on Zeeman slower using toroidal permanent magnets". Review of Scientific Instruments. 85 (10): 103104. Bibcode:2014RScI...85j3104K. doi:10.1063/1.4897151. ISSN 0034-6748. PMID 25362368. S2CID 30494084.

[11] K. Günter Design and implementation of a Zeeman slower for Rb 87

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]