Renard series

Renard series are a system of preferred numbers dividing an interval from 1 to 10 into 5, 10, 20, or 40 steps. ^[1] This set of preferred numbers was proposed in 1877 by French army engineer Colonel Charles Renard. ^{[2] [3] [4]} His system was adopted by the ISO in 1949 ^[5] to form the ISO Recommendation R3, first published in 1953 ^[6] or 1954, which evolved into the international standard ISO 3. ^[1] The factor between two consecutive numbers in a Renard series is approximately constant (before rounding), namely the 5th, 10th, 20th, or 40th root of 10 (approximately 1.58, 1.26, 1.12, and 1.06, respectively), which leads to a geometric sequence. This way, the maximum relative error is minimized if an arbitrary number is replaced by the nearest Renard number multiplied by the appropriate power of 10. One application of the Renard series of numbers is the current rating of electric fuses. Another common use is the voltage rating of capacitors (e.g. 100 V, 160 V, 250 V, 400 V, 630 V).

Base series

The most basic R5 series consists of these five rounded numbers, which are powers of the fifth root of 10, rounded to two digits. The Renard numbers are not always rounded to the closest three-digit number to the theoretical geometric sequence:

R5: 1.00 1.60 2.50 4.00 6.30

Examples

• If some design constraints were assumed so that two screws in a gadget should be placed between 32 mm and 55 mm apart, the resulting length would be 40 mm, because 4 is in the R5 series of preferred numbers.
• If a set of nails with lengths between roughly 15 and 300 mm should be produced, then the application of the R5 series would lead to a product repertoire of 16 mm, 25 mm, 40 mm, 63 mm, 100 mm, 160 mm, and 250 mm long nails.
• If traditional English wine cask sizes had been metricated, the rundlet (18 gallons, ca 68 liters), barrel (31.5 gal., ca 119 liters), tierce (42 gal., ca 159 liters), hogshead (63 gal., ca 239 liters), puncheon (84 gal., ca 318 liters), butt (126 gal., ca 477 liters) and tun (252 gal., ca 954 liters) could have become 63 (or 60 by R″5), 100, 160 (or 150), 250, 400, 630 (or 600) and 1000 liters, respectively.

Alternative series

If a finer resolution is needed, another five numbers are added to the series, one after each of the original R5 numbers, and one ends up with the R10 series. These are rounded to a multiple of 0.05. Where an even finer grading is needed, the R20, R40, and R80 series can be applied. The R20 series is usually rounded to a multiple of 0.05, and the R40 and R80 values interpolate between the R20 values, rather than being powers of the 80th root of 10 rounded correctly. In the table below, the additional R80 values are written to the right of the R40 values in the column named "R80 add'l". The R40 numbers 3.00 and 6.00 are higher than they "should" be by interpolation, in order to give rounder numbers.

In some applications more rounded values are desirable, either because the numbers from the normal series would imply an unrealistically high accuracy, or because an integer value is needed (e.g., the number of teeth in a gear). For these needs, more rounded versions of the Renard series have been defined in ISO 3. In the table below, rounded values that differ from their less rounded counterparts are shown in bold.

least rounded R5 R10 R20 R40 R80 add'l 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.06 1.09 1.12 1.12 1.15 1.18 1.22 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.28 1.32 1.36 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.06 2.12 2.18 2.24 2.24 2.30 2.36 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.58 2.65 2.72 2.80 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.07 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.25 3.35 3.45 3.55 3.55 3.65 3.75 3.87 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.12 4.25 4.37 4.50 4.50 4.62 4.75 4.87 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.15 5.30 5.45 5.60 5.60 5.75 6.00 6.15 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.50 6.70 6.90 7.10 7.10 7.30 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.75 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 —

medium rounded R′10 R′20 R′40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.20 2.40 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.60 2.80 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.20 4.50 4.50 4.80 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.30 5.60 5.60 6.00 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.70 7.10 7.10 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.50 10.0 10.0 10.0

most rounded R″5 R″10 R″20 — 1.0 1.0 1.0 — — 1.1 — — 1.2 1.2 — — 1.4 — — 1.5 1.5 1.6 — — 1.8 — — 2.0 2.0 — — 2.2 — — 2.5 2.5 2.5 — — 2.8 — — 3.0 3.0 — — 3.5 — — 4.0 4.0 4.0 — — 4.5 — — 5.0 5.0 — — 5.5 — — 6.0 6.0 6.0 — — 7.0 — — 8.0 8.0 — — 9.0 — — 10 10 10 —

As the Renard numbers repeat after every 10-fold change of the scale, they are particularly well-suited for use with SI units. It makes no difference whether the Renard numbers are used with metres or millimetres. But one would need to use an appropriate number base to avoid ending up with two incompatible sets of nicely spaced dimensions, if for instance they were applied with both inches and feet. In the case of inches and feet a root of 12 would be desirable, that is, ⁿ√12 where n is the desired number of divisions within the major step size of twelve. Similarly, a base of two, eight, or sixteen would fit nicely with the binary units commonly found in computer science.

Each of the Renard sequences can be reduced to a subset by taking every nth value in a series, which is designated by adding the number n after a slash. ^[4] For example, "R10″/3 (1…1000)" designates a series consisting of every third value in the R″10 series from 1 to 1000, that is, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 60, 120, 250, 500, 1000.

Such narrowing of the general original series brings the opposite idea of deepening the series and to redefine it by a strict simple formula. As the beginning of the selected series seen higher, the {1, 2, 4, 8, ...} series can be defined as binary. That means that the R10 series can be formulated as R10 ≈ bR3 = ³√2ⁿ, generating just 9 values of R10, just because of the kind of periodicity. This way rounding is eliminated, as the 3 values of the first period are repeated multiplied by 2. The usual cons however is that the thousand product of such multiplication is shifted slightly: Instead of decadic 1000, the binary 1024 appears, as classics in IT. The pro is that the characteristics is now fully valid, that whatever value multiplied by 2 is also member of the series, any rounding effectively eliminated. The multiplication by 2 is possible in R10 too, to get another members, but the long fractioned numbers complicate the R10 accuracy.

See also

• Preferred numbers
• Preferred metric sizes
• 1-2-5 series
• E series (preferred numbers)
• Logarithm
• Decibel
• Neper
• Phon
• Nominal Pipe Size (NPS)
• Geometric progression

References

1. ISO 3:1973-04 - Preferred Numbers - Series of Preferred Numbers. International Standards Organization (ISO). April 1973. Retrieved 2016-12-18. (Replaced: ISO Recommendation R3-1954 - Preferred Numbers - Series of Preferred Numbers. July 1954. (July 1953))
2. Kienzle, Otto Helmut [in German] (2013-10-04) [1950]. Written at Hannover, Germany. Normungszahlen [Preferred numbers]. Wissenschaftliche Normung (in German). Vol. 2 (reprint of 1st ed.). Berlin / Göttingen / Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag OHG. ISBN   978-3-642-99831-7 . Retrieved 2017-11-01. (340 pages)
3. Paulin, Eugen (2007-09-01). Logarithmen, Normzahlen, Dezibel, Neper, Phon - natürlich verwandt! [Logarithms, preferred numbers, decibel, neper, phon - naturally related!](PDF) (in German). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-18. Retrieved 2016-12-18.
4. "preferred numbers". Sizes, Inc. 2014-06-10 [2000]. Archived from the original on 2017-11-01. Retrieved 2017-11-01.
5. ISO 17:1973-04 - Guide to the use of preferred numbers and of series of preferred numbers. International Standards Organization (ISO). April 1973. Archived from the original on 2017-11-02. Retrieved 2017-11-02. […] Preferred numbers were first utilized in France at the end of the nineteenth century. From 1877 to 1879, Captain Charles Renard, an officer in the engineer corps, made a rational study of the elements necessary in the construction of […] aircraft. He computed the specifications […] according to a grading system […]. Recognizing the advantage to be derived from the geometrical progression, he adopted […] a grading system […] that would yield a tenth multiple of the value […] after every fifth step of the series […] Renard's theory was to substitute […] more rounded but […] practical values […] as a power of 10, positive, nil or negative. He thus obtained […] 10 16 25 40 63 100 […] continued in both directions […] by the symbol R5 […] the R10, R20, R40 series were formed, each adopted ratio being the square root of the preceding one […] The first standardization drafts were drawn up on these bases in Germany by the Normenausschuss der Deutschen Industrie on 13 April 1920, and in France by the Commission permanente de standardisation in document X of 19 December 1921. […] the commission of standardization in the Netherlands proposed their unification […] reached in 1931 […] in June 1932, the International Federation of the National Standardizing Associations organized an international meeting in Milan, where the ISA Technical Committee 32, Preferred numbers, was set up and its Secretariat assigned to France. On 19 September 1934, the ISA Technical Committee 32 held a meeting in Stockholm; sixteen nations were represented: Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, U.S.S.R. With the exception of the Spanish, Hungarian and Italian […] the other delegations accepted the draft […] Japan communicated […] its approval […] the international recommendation was laid down in ISA Bulletin 11 (December 1935). […] After the Second World War, the work was resumed by ISO. The Technical Committee ISO/TC 19, Preferred numbers, was set up and France again held the Secretariat. This Committee at its first meeting […] in Paris in July 1949 […] recommended […] preferred numbers defined by […] ISA Bulletin 11, […] R5, R10, R20, R40. This meeting was attended by […] 19 […] nations: Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, U.S.A., U.S.S.R. During […] subsequent meetings in New York in 1952 and […] the Hague in 1953, […] attended also by Germany, […] series R80 was added […] The draft thus amended became ISO Recommendation R3. […] (Replaced: ISO Recommendation R17-1956 - Preferred Numbers - Guide to the Use of Preferred Numbers and of Series of Preferred Numbers. 1956. (1955) and ISO R17/A1-1966 - Amendment 1 to ISO Recommendation R17-1955. 1966.)
6. De Simone, Daniel V. (July 1971). U.S. Metric Study Interim Report - Engineering Standards (PDF). Washington, USA: The National Bureau of Standards (NBS). NBS Special Publication 345-11 (Code: XNBSA). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-11-03. Retrieved 2017-11-03.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)

Further reading

• Hirshfeld, Clarence Floyd; Berry, C. H. (1922-12-04). "Size Standardization by Preferred Numbers". Mechanical Engineering. New York, USA: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 44 (12): 791–.
• Hazeltine, Louis Alan (January 1927) [December 1926]. "Preferred Numbers". Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers . Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE). 14 (4): 785–787. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1926.221089. ISSN   0731-5996.
• Van Dyck, Arthur F. (February 1936). "Preferred Numbers". Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers . Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE). 24 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1936.228053. ISSN   0731-5996. S2CID   140107818.
• Van Dyck, Arthur F. (March 1951) [February 1951]. "Preferred Numbers". Proceedings of the IRE . Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE). 39 (2): 115. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1951.230759. ISSN   0096-8390.
• ISO 497:1973-05 - Guide to the choice of series of preferred numbers and of series containing more rounded values of preferred numbers. International Standards Organization (ISO). May 1973. Archived from the original on 2017-11-02. Retrieved 2017-11-02. (Replaced: ISO Recommendation R497-1966 - Preferred Numbers - Guide to the Choice of Series of Preferred Numbers and of Series Containing More Rounded Values of Preferred Numbers. 1966.)
• Tuffentsammer, Karl; Schumacher, P. (1953). "Normzahlen – die einstellige Logarithmentafel des Ingenieurs" [Preferred numbers - the engineer's single-digit logarithm table]. Werkstattechnik und Maschinenbau (in German). 43 (4): 156.
• Tuffentsammer, Karl (1956). "Das Dezilog, eine Brücke zwischen Logarithmen, Dezibel, Neper und Normzahlen" [The decilog, a bridge between logarithms, decibel, neper and preferred numbers]. VDI-Zeitschrift (in German). 98: 267–274.