1789 English cricket season

Last updated

1789 English cricket season
1788
1790

The 1789 English cricket season was played against the backdrop of the French Revolution, which escalated after the Storming of the Bastille on 14 July when cricket patron John Frederick Sackville, 3rd Duke of Dorset, was the British ambassador in Paris. Dorset was reportedly planning a goodwill visit to France, but the crisis forced him to return home, and the venture was cancelled before his team could leave England. Details of 25 matches are known, but few were important. [note 1]

Contents

Proposed visit to Paris

The British ambassador to France, the Duke of Dorset, a leading patron of cricket, planned the formation of England to visit Paris on a goodwill tour and play matches there in August. [5] The team, captained by William Yalden, reportedly assembled in London and travelled to Dover on 10 August where, unexpectedly, they met the Duke himself coming the other way. He was returning to England following the escalation of the French Revolution and the venture was cancelled. [5] [6] [7] According to John Major in More Than A Game, "the whole story is nonsense". [8] On 16 July, two days after the Storming of the Bastille, Dorset had written to Foreign Secretary Francis Osborne, 5th Duke of Leeds, about the crisis and had warned other British residents to leave Paris so, Major contends, he would hardly have invited a cricket team to come to France at such a time. [9]

Dorset is known to have left Paris on 8 August. [10] He did not return and was temporarily replaced by his Embassy Secretary, Lord Robert Stephen FitzGerald, as Minister Plenipotentiary. New credentials were delivered by his official successor, Earl Gower, on 20 June 1790. Dorset's credentials were terminated on 29 June 1790. [10] If the venture had gone ahead, it would have been the first-ever international cricket tour but, instead, it became the first to be cancelled for political reasons. [6]

Kent v Surrey

Kent hosted Surrey between 10 and 12 June on Moulsey Hurst, with a return played 11 to 14 August at Bishopsbourne Paddock. In both matches, the visitors won: Kent by 3 wickets in June, and Surrey by 9 wickets in August. [11]

Hampshire v Kent

Kent also played two matches against Hampshire. The first of these was on Windmill Down through 13 and 14 July. Kent won by 56 runs. While this match was in progress on Tuesday, 14 July, the Storming of the Bastille occurred in Paris, as a pivotal event in the French Revolution. Robert Clifford and William Bullen played key roles in Kent's victory. They made the top scores of 27 and 20 in Kent's first innings of 98, and then took seven wickets each (bowled only) to dismiss Hampshire for 49 and 27. [12]

The return was played at Bishopsbourne Paddock from 18 to 21 August, and Hampshire won by 29 runs. [13]

England matches

There were two matches involving England, who played Kent in July and Hampshire in September. The match against Kent took place on the New Ground, Uxbridge Moor between 23 and 25 July. England's team included the young Billy Beldham, who made the game's top score of 48, which helped them to win by an innings and 10 runs. [14]

The return match was on Sevenoaks Vine from 2 to 5 September. This was the final match in the career of the great Lumpy Stevens. Hampshire won by 15 runs. [15]

Single wicket

Six of Hambledon played against Six of Kent between 9 and 10 July on Itchin Stoke Down. The match was drawn because of bad weather. [16]

Other events

On 25 May, a "gentlemen only" England team played Middlesex at Lord's Old Ground (Lord's). Middlesex, including ten professionals, won by an innings and 64 runs. [17]

By this time, George Finch, 9th Earl of Winchilsea had become one of the sport's most influential patrons. In June, he formed his own team for a match at Lord's against Sir Horatio Mann's XI. Winchilsea's XI won by 140 runs. [18]

At the end of the season, Leicester and Nottingham played two matches in Loughborough. Nottingham won the first by an innings and 16 runs; Leicester won the second by a single run. [19]

Notes

  1. Some eleven-a-side matches played from 1772 to 1863 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources. [1] However, the term only came into common use around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised. It was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. [2] Matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status. [3] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as important or, at least, historically significant. [4] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

  1. "FC Matches in England in 1772" . CricketArchive. Retrieved 29 November 2025.
  2. Wisden (1948). Preston, Hubert (ed.). Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (85th ed.). London: Sporting Handbooks Ltd. p. 813. OCLC   851705816.
  3. ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  4. ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  5. 1 2 Goulstone, John; Swanton, Michael (8 August 1989). "Carry on Cricket – The Duke of Dorset's 1789 Tour" . History Today. Vol. 39, no. 8. London: History Today Ltd. Retrieved 26 July 2020.
  6. 1 2 Keating, Frank (3 December 2001). "A pre-tour wrangle with India is par for the course". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  7. "Lot 491: The first printing of the 1788 MCC Laws of Cricket in an English newspaper". London: Bonhams. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  8. Major 2007, p. 86.
  9. Major 2007, p. 87.
  10. 1 2 Bindoff, S. T.; Smith, E. F. Malcolm; Webster, C. K. (1934). "British Diplomatic Representatives (1789–1852)". Camden Third Series, Volume 50. London: Royal Historical Society. pp. 47–48.
  11. Haygarth 1996, pp. 92, 96.
  12. Haygarth 1996, pp. 94–95.
  13. Haygarth 1996, p. 97.
  14. Haygarth 1996, p. 95.
  15. Haygarth 1996, pp. 98–99.
  16. Haygarth 1996, p. 94.
  17. Waghorn 2005, p. 99.
  18. Haygarth 1996, p. 91.
  19. Haygarth 1996, pp. 99–100.

Bibliography

Further reading