1739 English cricket season

Last updated

1739 English cricket season
1738
1740

Details have survived of seen eleven-a-side matches in the 1739 English cricket season. [note 1]

Contents

The growth of cricket is evident in the creation of teams representing the Rest of England and the huge public interest in them, a crowd of over 10,000 assembling for one match. The "all England" teams were formed to take on Kent which, as in previous seasons, had the game's strongest county team. Cricket joined the art world in 1739, an engraving called Youth Playing Cricket being the earliest known cricket subject on public display.

Matches

datematch titlevenueresultsource
18 June (M) Lingfield v London venue unknownLingfield won by 2 wkts [3] [4]
notes

The report does not state the venue of this match but does confirm the rematch to be played at the Artillery Ground on the 27th. This is the first reference to the Lingfield club which had a noted team in the 18th century.

27 June (W) London v Lingfield Artillery Ground result unknown [3] [4]
notes

No post-match report was found. The announcement is contained in the report of the previous match and said that "several large bets are depending".

5 July (Th) Kingston & Moulsey v London Moulsey Hurst Kingston & Moulsey won [3] [5] [4]
notes

Referenced in the report of the return match two weeks later (see below).

9 July (M) Kent v Rest of England Bromley Common Kent won [6] [4]
notes

This is the earliest known instance of a non-international England cricket team, loosely termed "all-England" or, more accurately, the Rest of England. The match report defines the all-England concept very well by saying that the match was billed as between "eleven gentlemen of that county (i.e., Kent) and eleven gentlemen from any part of England, exclusive of Kent". An all-England team is, in effect, the rest of England outside its opponents so, in this case, players resident in Kent were ineligible for selection. Kent, which had a very strong team in this period and was described as "the Unconquerable County", won by "a very few notches".

19 July (Th) London v Kingston & Moulsey Kennington Common Kingston & Moulsey won by 3 runs [5]
notes

The London & Country Journal dated Tuesday, 24 July, reported on the second of these two matches but made references to the previous one on Thursday, 5 July. It seems that Kingston & Moulsey won the first game because of "the Londoners turning out three bad men who played on Moulsey Hurst". Kingston & Moulsey won the second game by three runs despite losing "five of their best hands" from the earlier match. London replaced the "three bad men" with Lord John Sackville, Mr Dunn and Mr Boarer (sic) who were described as "three very good gamesters".

23 July (M) Rest of England v Kent Artillery Ground drawn [7] [4] [8]
notes

A report of this game includes the phrase "eleven picked out of all (sic) England". Kent led by over 50 on the first innings, and betting was then 2 to 1 in their favour. The report says: "The Kentish Men were likely to have won, but a Dispute arose whether one of the Londoners was fairly out, which put an End to the Game. There were upwards of 10,000 People to see this Match". One account stated that Kent's opponents were London, but that was an error because "all England" confirms that the match was a return to that played two weeks earlier at Bromley Common.

5 September (W) London v Chislehurst Artillery Ground result unknown [9]
notes

Pre-announced by the London Evening Post on Saturday, 1 September.

Other events

The earliest known cricket picture was first displayed this year, an engraving called Youth Playing Cricket by Hubert-François Gravelot (1699–1773). The picture showed two groups of cherubic lads gathered around a batsman and a bowler. The wicket shown is the "low stool" shape, probably 2-foot (0.61 m) wide by 1-foot (0.30 m) tall, naturally with two stumps and a single bail. Gravelot helped to establish the French Rococo style in English publishing and was one of the most celebrated illustrators of the time. He worked in England between 1732 and 1745, opening a drawing school on the Strand which had Thomas Gainsborough (1727–1788) among its pupils. [10]

Due to construction work on the site, 1739 was the last year in which cricket could be played in Lamb's Conduit Field. Thomas Coram's Foundling Hospital was established there in 1739. [11]

Monday, 20 August. A 12-a-side game was organised on Coxheath Common by the Earl of Middlesex and Lord John Sackville between teams from the Sevenoaks (aka the Hills) and Maidstone (aka the Dales) areas. [12]

According to Maun on page 96 of his book, there was an Essex v London match in Ilford on "Monday, 1 August" (sic), but this is an error as 1 August 1739 was a Wednesday. [13] The match in question is the one played on Monday, 1 August 1737 (qv). [14]

Notes

  1. Some eleven-a-side matches played before 1864 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources, but there was no such standard at the time. The term came into common use from around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised, and was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. However, matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status. [1] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as top-class or, at least, historically significant. [2] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

  1. ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  2. ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  3. 1 2 3 Waghorn, p. 22.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 ACS, Important Matches, p. 20.
  5. 1 2 Buckley, pp. 15–16.
  6. Waghorn, pp. 22–23.
  7. Maun, pp. 95–96.
  8. Waghorn, p. 23.
  9. Buckley, p. 16.
  10. Major, pp. 95 & 299.
  11. Maun, p. 97.
  12. Maun, pp. 96–97.
  13. "Historical Calendar". A. R. Collins. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
  14. Maun, p. 96.

Bibliography

Further reading