1795 English cricket season

Last updated

1795 English cricket season
1794
1796

The enigmatic Marylebone Thursday Club made its bow in the 1795 English cricket season. In Samuel Britcher's opinion, [1] it was the Middlesex county XI. Details of 26 matches are known, but few were important. [note 1]

Contents

MCC v Thursday Club

Ostensibly, the Marylebone Thursday Club was a group who gathered at Lord's Old Ground (Lord's) each Thursday to practice or play cricket. Samuel Britcher, however, pointed out that they were moreorless the same people who played for Middlesex. While it would be an easy option to label all these teams as Middlesex, it would not necessarily be correct. [1]

There were five MCC v Thursday Club matches in 1795, four in May and one at the end of June. The Thursday Club won three, MCC two. The teams were all-square at the end of May, so the June match may have been arranged as a "decider". MCC won the first and fourth matches by two wickets, [6] and by 94 runs, [7] respectively. The second and third matches were victories for the Thursday Club by 8 wickets, [6] and by 38 runs. [8]

The final match ended in a win for the Thursday Club by 3 wickets. [9]

England matches

England played four matches with mixed results. The first was against MCC at Lord's, and MCC won by 15 runs. [10] In August, England met Hampshire twice on Dartford Brent. They won the first by 16 runs. [11] The second match was a victory for Hampshire by 4 wickets. [11] This is believed to have been the final important match ever played on the Brent, which had been a major venue throughout the 18th century. Matches in Dartford after 1795 were played at Bowman's Lodge on Dartford Heath. England's fourth match was against Kent on Penenden Heath, near Maidstone, and they won by 5 wickets. [12]

Other events

Berkshire had two matches at Lord's. They lost to Middlesex by 233 runs in July, [13] and to MCC by 2 wickets in August. [14]

Sir Horatio Mann arranged three matches on his new Dandelion Paddock ground, near Margate, in September. The first was against Richard Leigh's XI, and Mann's XI won that game by 37 runs. [12] There was a return two weeks later, which Leigh's XI won by an innings and 98 runs. [15] Between those two matches, Mann's XI lost to the Earl of Darnley's XI by 242 runs. [16]

Leigh's XI played two matches against the Earl of Winchilsea's XI. These were both played in Hampshire: first on Windmill Down, where Winchilsea's XI won by 113 runs; then on Itchin Stoke Down, where Leigh's XI won by 3 wickets. [17]

There were three matches at Lord's between Winchilsea's XI and that of Colonel Charles Lennox. The latter won all three by margins of 48 runs, [18] 10 wickets, [18] and 129 runs. [13]

Notes

  1. Some eleven-a-side matches played from 1772 to 1863 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources. [2] However, the term only came into common use around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised. It was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. [3] Matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status. [4] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as important or, at least, historically significant. [5] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

  1. 1 2 Britcher 1795.
  2. "FC Matches in England in 1772" . CricketArchive. Retrieved 29 November 2025.
  3. Wisden (1948). Preston, Hubert (ed.). Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (85th ed.). London: Sporting Handbooks Ltd. p. 813. OCLC   851705816.
  4. ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  5. ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  6. 1 2 Haygarth 1996, p. 178.
  7. Haygarth 1996, p. 180.
  8. Haygarth 1996, p. 179.
  9. Haygarth 1996, p. 185.
  10. Haygarth 1996, p. 184.
  11. 1 2 Haygarth 1996, p. 191.
  12. 1 2 Haygarth 1996, p. 193.
  13. 1 2 Haygarth 1996, p. 187.
  14. Haygarth 1996, p. 189.
  15. Haygarth 1996, p. 195.
  16. Haygarth 1996, p. 194.
  17. Haygarth 1996, p. 188.
  18. 1 2 Haygarth 1996, p. 181.

Bibliography

Further reading